8/13/2019 Case Assign. Consti 2 Jan. 27, 2014 Recitation-1

1/5

1

NAME CASE NO.

1.Abesamis 1-82. Abog 11-163.Anza 17-244.Arosa 25-325.Cruz 33-406.De Jesus 41-487.Dela Cruz 49-568.Fernandez 57-659.Gregorio 66-7310. Laban 74-8111. Mercurio 82-8912. Odonio 90-9813. Orias 99-10614. Razon 107-11515. Ruppac 116-12316. Resureccion 124-13117. Solitario 132-14018. Somera 141-148

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II

DUE PROCESSArt. III, Sec. IArt. III. Sec. 14 (1)

Definition, Nature and Scope

Purpose of the guaranty1. Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884)

Meaning of Life, Liberty, and Property

Substantive Due Process2. Villegas vs. Hu Chong Tsai Pao Ho, 86 SCRA 275 (1978)3. Rubi vs. Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919)

Void for Vagueness or Procedural due process uncertainty/Overbreadth4. Ople v. Torres, 292 SCRA 141. (1998)5. Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 20016. David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171390, May 3, 20067. Ong v. Sandiganbayayn, G.R. No. 126858, September 16, 20058. SPS. CARLOS S. ROMUALDEZ et al, v. COMELEC et al G.R. NO. 167011(April 30,

2008)Procedural Due Process

Publication Requirement9. Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986)10.PITC v. Angeles, 263 SCRA 421 (1996)11.Republic v. Extelcom, G.R. 147096, January 15, 2002

Impartial Court or Tribunal

12.Tanada vs. PAEC, 141 SCRA 307 (1986)13.Anzaldo vs. Clave , 119 SCRA 353 (1982)14.Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 200515.Tumey vs. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1997)16.People v. Court of Appeals, 262 SCRA 452 (1996)17.Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan, 268 SCRA 332 (1997)

Prejudicial Publicity

18.Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966)

8/13/2019 Case Assign. Consti 2 Jan. 27, 2014 Recitation-1

2/5

8/13/2019 Case Assign. Consti 2 Jan. 27, 2014 Recitation-1

3/5

3

Emergency Powers

54.Rutter vs. Esteban, 93 Phil. 68 (1953)Zoning and Regulatory Ordinances

55.Villanueva vs. Castaneda, 154 SCRA 142 (1987)56.Sangalang vs. IAC, 168 SCRA 634 (1988)57.Ortigas & Co. v. CA, G.R. No. 126102, December 4, 2000

Administrative Regulations58.Tiro vs. Hontanosas, 125 SCRA 697 (1983)

Rental Laws59.Caleon vs. Agus Development Corp., 207 SCRA 748 (1992)

Tax Exemptions

60.Meralco v. Province of Laguna, 306 SCRA 750 (1999)

ARRESTS, SEARCHES AND SEIZURESArt. III, Sec. 2 and 3

Purpose and Importance of the guaranty

61.Alvero v. Dizon, 76 Phil 637 (1946)To Whom Directed62.People vs. Andre Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)Who May Invoke the Right?

63.Bache and Co., vs. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 323 (1971)64.Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)65.Zurcher vs. Stanford Daily, 436 U. S. 547 (1978)66.Wilson v. Layne, 98-0083, May 24, 1999

Conditions for a valid warrantExistence of Probable Cause

67.Burgos vs. Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984)68.Chandler v. Miller, April 15, 1997, D-96-12669.People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432) (1999)70.People v. Molina, G.R. No. 133917, February 19, 2001

Partially Valid Warrant71.People v. Salanguit, G.R. 133254, April 18, 200172.Microsoft Corp. v. Maxicorp., G.R. 140946, September 13, 2004

Personal determination by judge73.Sta. Rosa Mining Co., vs. Fiscal Zabala, 153 SCRA 367 (1987)74.Paderanga vs. Drilon, G.R. 96080, April 19, 199175.Pita vs. CA, 178 SCRA 362 (1987)76.Abdula v. Guiani. 326 SCRA 1 (2000)77.People v. Mamaril, G.R. 147607, January 22, 2004

Examination of witnesses

78.Pasion Vda. De Garcia vs. Locsin, 65 Phil 68 (1938)79.Yee Sue Kuy vs. Almeda, 70 Phil. 141, (1940)80.

Alvarez vs. CFI, 64 Phil. 33 (1937)81.Mata vs. Bayona , 128 SCRA 388 (1984)

Particularity of description82.Olaes vs. People, 155 SCRA 486 (1987)83.Prudente vs. Judge Dayrit, 180 SCRA 69 (1989)84.Chia vs. Coll. of Customs, 177 SCRA 755 (1989)85.20thCentury Fox Film Corp. vs. CA, 164 SCRA 655 (1988)86.People v. Choi, G.R. No. 152950, August 3, 200687.Nolasco vs. Cruz Pano, 132 SCRA 152 (1985)88.PICOP v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253) (1999)89.Yousef Al Ghoul vs. C.A, GR No.126859, September 4, 200190.Del Rosario v. People G.R. No. 142295, May 31,2001).

Objects of Seizure

Rule 126, Sec. 3, Rules of Court (ROC)91.Unilab v. Isip, G.R. No. 163858, June 28, 2005

Warrantless searchesValid Waiver

92.People vs. Omaweng, 213 SCRA 462 (1992)93.People v. Correa, 285 SCRA 679 (1998)94.People vs. Ramos, G.R. 85401-02, June 4, 199095.People v. Barros, 231 SCRA 557 (1994)

8/13/2019 Case Assign. Consti 2 Jan. 27, 2014 Recitation-1

4/5

4

96.Veroy vs. Layague, 210 SCRA 97 (1992)97.People vs. Damaso, 212 SCRA 457 (1992)98.Lopez vs. Comm. Of Customs, 68 SCRA 320 (1975)99.Caballes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136292, January 5, 2002100. People vs. Asis, et. al., G.R. No. 142531, October 15, 2002101. People vs. Tudtud, et. al., G.R. No. 144037, September 26, 2003

Incident to lawful arrestRule 126, Section 13, Rules of Court

102. Chimel vs. California, 395 U. S. 752 (1964)103. People vs. de la Cruz, G.R. 83988, April 18, 1990104. People v. Kalubiran, 196 SCRA 645 (1991)105. People v. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401 (1991)106. Espano v. Court of Appeals, 288 SCRA 558 (1998)107. People vs. Tangliben, 184 SCRA 220 (1990)108. People v. Che Chun Ting, 328 SCRA 592 (2000)109. People vs. Estrella, G.R. Nos. 138539-40, January 21, 2003110. People vs. Libnao, et al., G.R. No. 136860, January 20, 2003

Plain view doctrine

111. People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993)112. Padilla v. CA, 269 SCRA 402 (1997)113. People v. Valdez, G.R. No. 129296, September 25, 2000114. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 [1987]}115. People v. Compacion, G.R. No. 124442, July 20, 2001116. People v. Huang Zhen Hua, G.R. 139301, September 29, 2004

Enforcement of fishing, customs and immigration laws117. Roldan vs. Area, 65 SCRA 320 (1975)118. People v. Gatward, 267 SCRA 785 (1997)119. People v. Johnson, G.R. No. 138881, December 18, 2000120. People vs. Suzuki, G.R. No. 120670, October 23, 2003

Stop and frisk

121. Terry vs. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)122. People v. Solayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996)123. Manalili v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 113447, October 7, 1997124. Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159 (1997)125. Florida v. J.L., 98-1993, March 28, 2000

Search of moving vehicles126. Papa vs. Mago, 22 SCRA 857 (1968)127. People vs. CFI of Rizal, 101 SCRA 86 (1980)128. Salvador v. People, G.R. No. 146706, July 15, 2005129. Whren v. United States, 95-5841, January 10, 1996

Emergency circumstances

130. People vs. De Gracia 233 SCRA 716 (1994)Checkpoints

131. Gen. De Villa vs. Valmonte G.R. No. 83988, May 24, 1990132. Aniag vs. Comelec, 237 SCRA 424 (1994)133. People v. Usana, 323 SCRA 754 (2000)134. People v. Vinecario, G.R. No. 141137, January 20, 2004

Inspection of buildings

135. Camara vs. Municipal Court, 387 U. S. 523 (1967)Warrantless arrests

Rule 113, Sec. 5

Art. 125, Revised Penal Code

Rebellion as Continuing Offense136. Umil vs. Ramos, G. R. 81567, July 9, 1990

Committed in the Presence of Police Officers

137.

People v. Sucro, 195 SCRA 388 (1991)138. People v. Luisito Go, G.R. No. 116001, March 14, 2001Personal Knowledge of the Offense

139. People vs. Gerente, 219 SCRA 756 (1993)140. People v. Sinoc, 275 SCRA 357 (1997)141. People v. Baula, G.R. No. 132671, November 15, 2000142. People v. Cubcubin, G.R. No. 136267, July 10, 2001

Time of Arrest

143. People vs. Rodrigueza, 205 SCRA 791 (1992)

8/13/2019 Case Assign. Consti 2 Jan. 27, 2014 Recitation-1

5/5

5

144. Go vs. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 586 (1992)145. People v. Calimlim, G.R. No. 123980, August 30. 2001

Marked Money146. People vs. Enrile, 222 SCRA 586 (1993)

Lack of Urgency147. People v. Pasudag, G.R. No. 128822, May 4, 2001148. People vs. Aminnudin, 163 SCRA 402 (1988)Effect of Bail

Rule 114, Section 26Effect of Entry of Plea

149. People v. Plana G.R. No. 128285, November 27, 2001Validity of Conviction

150. People v. Conde, G.R. No. 113269, April 10, 2001