Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease...

31
5/26/2017 1 Pitfalls in Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pathology Laura W. Lamps M.D. Godfrey D. Stobbe Professor of Gastrointestinal Pathology University of Michigan Department of Pathology Patient Safety Officer, Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor, MI Unforced error (LWL) A player makes an error that is not the result of an action by his/her opponent The player has full control of his/her actions, but still makes a mistake Forced error (LWL plus clinician) The opponent hits a difficult shot and causes the player to miss Succumbing to an impossible ball that can’t be returned Errors from the stands Errors that I did not actually commit, but watched happen, and had good seats Case #1 Unforced Error 50 year old woman s/p renal transplant, with diarrhea Duodenal biopsy

Transcript of Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease...

Page 1: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

1

Pitfalls in Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pathology

Laura W. Lamps M.D.Godfrey D. Stobbe Professor of Gastrointestinal Pathology

University of Michigan Department of Pathology

Patient Safety Officer, Michigan MedicineAnn Arbor, MI

• Unforced error (LWL)– A player makes an error that is not the result of an action by his/her opponent– The player has full control of his/her actions, but still makes a mistake

• Forced error (LWL plus clinician)– The opponent hits a difficult shot and causes the player to miss– Succumbing to an impossible ball that can’t be returned

• Errors from the stands– Errors that I did not actually commit, but watched happen, and had good seats

Case #1Unforced Error

50 year old woman s/p renal transplant, with diarrhea

Duodenal biopsy

Page 2: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

2

Next day………….

• Clinician called and asked for CMV immunostain because he was sure patient had CMV (of note, this was on the requisition, but it’s on 98% of his requisitions, so I ignored it)

• CMV immunostain grudgingly ordered

CMV immunostain

Page 3: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

3

Mistakes Made• Looked at cases too quickly

• Violated own rules of when to order special stains

Mistakes Made• Looked at cases too quickly

• Violated own rules of when to order special stains

• Allowed irritability to cloud judgment• Corollary: Just because the person asking drives you nuts,

doesn‘t mean what they are asking for is crazy

Page 4: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

4

Essentially Normal Bx in Immunocompromised Patient

Increased apoptotic

epithelial cells

CMVAdenovirus

Don’t overlook spirochetosis, coccidians, or

Giardia!

Are they severely immunocompromised?Is there another reason

to worry?

No

Done!

Yes

Get history, consider GMS,

CMV

Big unexplained ulcer

? Elderly Patient

Yes

CMV

No

Get history, tailor workup to that

Immunocompromised Patient

Yes

CMV?HSVGMS?AFB

Utility of Special Stains in Evaluation of Biopsies for GI Infections

• Monkemuller et al, AJCP 2000• HIV patients• 28 months• Sensitivity and specificity for CMV diagnosis on H&E were 97%

and 100%• AFB/GMS stains did not identify previously diagnoses infection in

any patient• Long-term follow-up revealed no missed infections on H&E• Stains doubled cost

Page 5: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

5

Utility of CMV Stains in Evaluation of Biopsies from UC Flares

• Kambham et al, AJSP 2004• Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease• 25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain

• 60% of these had been missed on H&E• Recommend using CMV IHC in evaluation of biopsies in these patients

CMV-poorly formed inclusions

Page 6: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

6

Lessons Learned• Slow down

• Don’t break own your own rules; you made them for a reason

• Don’t allow irritability to cloud judgment/good patient care

Whatever it was, I didn’t do

it.

Case #2Unforced Error

56 year old woman with abdominal pain, gastritis

Page 7: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

7

Page 8: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

8

Partial gastrectomy

Pseudo-Signet Ring Cells•Benign cells with signet ring morphology

• Degenerative change associated with:• Ulceration/reactive gastropathy• Ischemia• C. difficile-associated pseudomembranous colitis

Page 9: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

9

Autoimmune gastritis

Pseudo signet ring cells in C. difficile infection-courtesy Dr. Wendy Frankel

Page 10: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

10

Real signet ring cells

Mistakes Made

• Didn’t put enough weight on the fact that all the atypical cells were detached

• Didn’t put enough weight on the fact that the largest nuclei were not that much larger than normal nuclei

• Correlation with macroscopic appearance (doesn’t always help with gastric cancer, though)

Can Stains Help?• Cytokeratin

• Both benign and malignant signet ring cells will be positive• Exception: muciphages

• Mucin• Helpful if negative, not so if positive

• Reticulin• Maybe

Page 11: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

11

Muciphages

Can Stains Help?• Proliferation markers

• Maybe• Reactive processes can also be very proliferative

• E-cadherin• Maybe• E-cadherin often decreased in signet ring cell carcinomas

From Hughes, Greywoode, and Chetty: Virchows Arch 2011;459:347-9

Reticulin stain highlights basement membrane of glands

Page 12: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

12

E-cadherin

Pseudomembranous colitis Signet ring cell carcinoma

Courtesy Dr. Wendy Frankel

E-cadherin-signet ring cell carcinoma

Ki-67Pseudomembranous colitis Chemical gastropathy

Courtesy Dr. Wendy Frankel

Page 13: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

13

Lessons Learned• Location of signet ring cells of paramount importance

• Lamina propria vs. discohesive, detached

• Four fine pathologists can all be wrong

• Proliferation markers, reticulin, E-cadherin might have helped but not necessarily

Is that a real signet ring cell or a fake one?

Case #3Unforced Error

65 year old man with poorly defined gastric mass

Page 14: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

14

Diagnosis: Plasmacytoid Neoplasm• Very poorly defined (or so I’m told)

• Gross description describes tiny bits

• I worked in one of the largest myeloma centers in the world

• CD138 +++++++++++++++++++++• Kappa and Lambda have high background staining, not useful

Page 15: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

15

Two months later……..• Attend CME conference where John Goldblum speaks about new GIST variants

• Describes a strikingly plasmacytoid variant of GIST

• Uh-oh. !@#$%!!

Mistakes Made• Should have known the literature better

• Did not know all the vagaries of immunostainsemployed

• Allowed context of where I worked to influence differential

Plasmacytoid (pleomorphic) GIST•Majority of GISTs are monomorphic•Small subset are pleomorphic

• Myxoid/hyalinized stroma• Variant of epithelioid GIST• Some have very distinctive plasmacytoid features

Page 16: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

16

Immunostains will get you into trouble• CD117

• Plasma cells• GIST• Melanoma• Neuroendocrine

tumors• Thymic and other

carcinomas• Kaposi’s sarcoma• PEComa

DOG-1Molecular studies

Immunostains will get you into trouble

• DOG-1 positivity• Non-mesenchymal

• Gastric adenocarcinoma• Acinic cell carcinoma of

salivary gland• Melanoma

• Rare mesenchymal• Synovial sarcoma• MPNST

Hemminger and Iwenofu. Histopathology 2012;61;170-77.

Immunostains will get you into trouble• CD138

• Plasma cells• Plasmacytoid urothelial

carcinoma• Papillary thyroid

carcinoma• Other plasmacytoid

carcinomas and mesenchymal tumors

• Endometrium

Lessons Learned• Remove oneself from context before making final diagnosis

• Keep up with literature

• Understand your immunostains

Page 17: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

17

Zoe and Alys contemplate the pitfalls of immunohistochemistry.

Case #4Forced Error

Solitary liver mass in young woman with “renal cell carcinoma”

Page 18: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

18

Frozen Section Conversation• LWL: What kind of renal cell carcinoma did she have?

• Surgeon: The regular kind.• LWL: Clear cell?• Surgeon: Yeah.

Page 19: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

19

Mistakes Made• Should have worked harder to find out history on our own

• Should have more strongly considered all the options in the differential diagnosis of “renal cell carcinoma”

• Noncirrhotic liver……

• LWL (looking at frozens of multiple spindled nodules on serosa of bowel and stomach): This looks like a neurofibroma.

• Surgeon: No way!!

SILENCE…………

• Surgeon: Huh. Maybe that explains the bumps all over him and his family.

In my defense……..

• KC (looking at frozen of weird metastatic liver lesion): It says here that the patient had cancer in the tail of the pancreas. Do you know what kind of cancer it was?

• Surgeon: The kind that is in the tail of the pancreas.

Nodules in Cirrhotic vs. Noncirrhotic Livers

• CIRRHOTIC LIVER• Regenerative nodule• HGDN• Hepatocellular

carcinoma

• NONCIRRHOTIC LIVER• Focal nodular

hyperplasia• Adenoma• Nodular regenerative

hyperplasia• Hepatocellular

carcinoma• Mets

Page 20: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

20

HCC, well differentiated

Normal

HCC

Page 21: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

21

Quiz: RCC vs. HCC

Quiz: RCC vs. HCC Quiz: RCC vs. HCC

Page 22: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

22

Quiz: RCC vs. HCC Helpful hint: put in more sections

Helpful hint: HCC, clear cell variant, Hepatocyte Antigen

Feature HCC RCC ACC

Clear Cells Yes Yes Yes

Prominent vessels Common Common +/-

EMA - + -

Hepatocyte Antigen, Arginase-1, etc.

+ - -

Inhibin, SF1 Negative Negative Positive

PAX2 and PAX8 - + -

Differentiation Between HCC and Other Trabecular Neoplasms

Page 23: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

23

A few last minute IHC warnings• CD10 can stain HCC• PEComa can lose reticulin (but will be HMB45 positive)• Hepatocyte antigen can stain carcinoids, and neuroendocrine

markers can stain HCC• HCC can stain with CK7 and CK20 and CK19• Some adenocarcinomas can stain with HSA, but it’s still better than

AFP

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma: HSA+

Lessons Learned• Always leave yourself a little wiggle room on difficult

cases• Most people have metastases rather than a new weird

primary

• Always treat unproven verbal information relayed by surgeon with healthy degree of skepticism

• Morphologic pitfalls are even harder to deal with on frozen section

What do you mean that’s a watering

can? It’s not a renal cell carcinoma? I

am shocked!

Page 24: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

24

Case #5Errors from the Stands

60 year old man with “refractory sprue”

Duodenal biopsy

Page 25: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

25

“Refractory Sprue”•Meanwhile…..

• Patient continued to do poorly• ANA positive, TTG negative• Eventually, anti-enterocyte and anti-goblet cell

antibodies came back positive• Patient started on azathioprine, did much better

Mistakes Made• Persistent belief in diagnosis even though patient

has never responded to therapy and labs don’t match up with diagnosis

• Multiple doctors in different systems that don’t communicate

• Persistence of false history in medical record• ”Chart virus”

Autoimmune Enterocolitis• Well recognized in children; probably markedly under-recognized in

adults• Associated with many extraintestinal autoimmune illnesses

• Diabetes mellitus• Membranous glomerulonephropathy• Thyroid disease• Thymomas• Autoimmune hemolytic anemia• Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome

Autoimmune EnterocolitisClinical Presentation

• Profound diarrhea and weight loss• No response to gluten free diet

• Patients often initially diagnosed as celiac disease• Antibodies against enterocytes and/or goblet cells• May also have positive ANA, AMA, anti-SM, etc.

Page 26: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

26

Celiac Disease vs. Autoimmune Enteropathy

Celiac disease• Villous blunting• Intraepithelial lymphocytes

• Usually more than AIE• Neutrophilic inflammation• Numerous lamina propria

plasma cells• Crypt hyperplasia

Autoimmune enteropathy• Villous blunting• Intraepithelial lymphocytes• Neutrophilic inflammation

• Often more than celiac disease• Numerous lamina propria plasma

cells• Apoptotic epithelial cells• Lack of goblet cells• May affect entire gut

Autoimmune Enteritis vs. Celiac Disease

Autoimmune enteropathy Celiac disease

Celiac disease

Celiac Disease vs. Autoimmune EnteritisCeliac disease Autoimmune enteritis

Page 27: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

27

Colon with plasmacytic infiltrate, cryptitis, no goblet cells, apoptosis

Normal Villi Variable Defect Severe Defect

Immuno-deficiency* X X X

Amyloid* X

Mastocytosis* X X

Celiac Disease X X X

Infection* X X X

Drug Injury X X X

Crohn’s X X

Autoimmune enteritis X X

Peptic duodenitis X X

Chemo/radiation* X X

Eosinophilic enteritis* X X

Protein injury X X

Stasis X X

*may have more specific or diagnostic histologic features

Page 28: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

28

Common Variable Immunodeficiency• Small bowel

• Celiac disease-like lesion• GVHD-like lesion• Decreased plasma cells, goblet cells• Granulomatous enteropathy• Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia• Crohn’s like enteritis• Lymphoma• Infection

Common Variable ImmunodeficiencySprue-like Lesion

• Often associated with severe malabsorption

• May require parenteral nutrition• May be indistinguishable from celiac

disease• Most patients do not respond to gluten-

free diet

CVID: sprue-like pattern

Idiopathic Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

• Infiltration of one or more segments of GI tract by eosinophils, including pancreas and biliary tree

• Villous blunting, increased IELs overlap with celiac disease in mucosal-predominant IEG

• Excess of eosinophils favors IEG• 75% of patients have peripheral eosinophilia• Negative TTG, no response to gluten free diet

Page 29: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

29

Olmesartan Toxicity• Common angiotensin II receptor antagonist

(antihypertensive)• Severe chronic diarrhea and weight loss, often

requiring hospitalization• Morphologic changes may resemble celiac disease,

collagenous sprue, and/or microscopic colitis

Courtesy Dr. Dora Lam-Himlin

Page 30: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

30

Features on Biopsy Helpful Features

Eosinophilicenteritis

Increased eos Peripheral countH/o atopy

Autoimmune enteritis Too many polysAbsent goblet cells

Apoptotic epithelial cells

Anti-enterocyte/ anti-goblet cell labsMore than small bowel involved

CVID Decreased/absent plasma cellsApoptotic epithelial cells

Immunodeficiency w/uMore than small bowel involved

Olmesartan +/- marked villous blunting, crypt hyperplasia, IELs, eosinophils

Medication history

“Scalloping” is nonspecific Lessons Learned• Most patients with negative celiac disease serologies and

no response to gluten free diet do not have celiac disease

• There are many mimics of celiac disease,common and uncommon

• When many things don’t fit, keep looking, and encourage our colleagues to do so as well

Page 31: Case #1 Unforced Error - UCSF CME · •Case control study of UC patient with refractory disease •25% of patients with refractory UC had CMV inclusions on immunostain •60% of

5/26/2017

31

Summary• Everyone makes mistakes• Most mistakes are not because of incredibly complex

cases, but because we do (or fail to do) something simple• If someone can help you mess up, they will