Carrete Et Al (2010) Biological Conservation
2
Letter to the Editor The precautionary principle and wind-farm planning: Data scarcity does not imply absence of effects Scientific discussions such as that raised by Janss et al. (2010) in relation to our paper (Carrete et al., 2009) help to clarify issues in the field of wind energy planning, thus relegating non-technical is- sues that can potentially contaminate the debate. Janss et al. (2010) recognize the value of our work as the first large-scale assessment of wind farms on the population viability of an endan- gered species. However, these authors argue that (1) wind-farms in Andalusia (SE Spain) have been carefully planned, with wind-farm locations chosen on the basis of previous risk assessment studies (RAS), and (2) the mortality rate of Egyptian vultures used in our paper to develop the PVA analysis is a local phenomenon that can- not be extrapolated to other areas of Spain. We will try to briefly clarify these points, showing that they are based on outdated infor- mation suggesting that results and conclusions brought forth in our paper remain valid. Janss et al. (2010) directly contradict what they advocate when, after arguing that the locations of wind-farms in Andalusia have been carefully planned, they recognize that the recent installation of a ‘‘huge new wind-farm” in 2004 in the area of Tarifa has resulted in high mortality rates for raptors. This shows that either the rec- ommendations made in RAS are not met or, more reasonably, that studies conducted were not able to predict subsequent mortality. For example, the radius of 5 km used to assess risky zones for the Egyptian vulture in Andalusia is based on studies conducted two decades ago, while more recent analyses of radio-tracked birds indicate that the home range for this species can be much greater (average radii of 8 km). This value overlaps with the spatial distri- bution of fatalities affecting breeding birds (6.37–14.57 km; Carrete et al., 2009). Low predictive ability of RAS may also be mediated by: (1) the use of protocols counting birds at specific points during par- ticular periods of time instead of considering changes in the spatial distribution of the whole population of sensitive species year- round, and (2) the unknown role played by factors such as atmo- spheric dynamics or the distribution of trophic resources in enhancing mortality rates under certain conditions. Janss et al. (2010) also propose that the mortality data of Egyptian vultures used in our PVA analysis ‘‘largely correspond to one particular wind-farm and might thus not represent a widespread scenario”. Authors explain that in areas of northern Spain where densities of Egyptian vultures are very high compared to that of Cadiz (Carrete et al., 2009) ‘‘no studies have recorded collision mortality for this species”. Both statements are incorrect and based on outdated data. The mortality of Egyptian vultures reported in our paper (from 2004 to 2008) has not been produced from one, but rather from three wind-farms, namely Tahivilla (one non-territorial individual, 2004), El Gallego (two non-territorial individuals, 2007), and La Herrería (two territorial individuals, 2008). Also supporting the fact that our PVA models are not futile exercises in extrapolating a local event to the entire Spanish range of the species, we report at least eight records of death of Egyptian vultures at wind-farms from 2006 to 2009 in the northern range of the species (4 in Navarre, 1 in Castilla-León, 1 in Castilla-La Mancha, 1 in Valencia and 1 in Gali- cia; Consellería Medio Ambiente, Generalitat Valenciana, authors unpublished data). The absence of prior information may have been a consequence of the less intensive monitoring of this species and of mortality in wind-farms throughout Spain compared to Andalusia, as well as of the recent rampant increment in wind power in Spain (107% from 2004 to 2008; http://www.portalenergia.es/noticias/ 2009/02). Interestingly, compared to poisoning (assumed as the main cause of non-natural mortality for the Egyptian vulture in Spain), mortality at wind-farms is not negligible (reported deaths at wind-farms vs poisoning: Spain: 2.5 vs 18.5 ind/year, Andalusia: 1.2 vs 1 ind/year; Hernández and Margalida, 2009). The growth of wind power is causing a greater and more wide- spread impact on long-lived birds highly sensitive to unnatural causes of mortality. The current framework is proving ineffective for planning, and the reality is that removing or reforming existing wind-farms is virtually impossible due to the absence of regulatory and flexible administrative mechanisms (only the activity of two parks in Spain have been paralyzed because of high mortality rates). In this scenario, we reaffirm the need for applying the precaution- ary principle to minimize the impact of wind-farms on populations of long-lived species. At the same time, we agree with Janss et al. (2010) about the need to more thoroughly study mortality factors in order to incorporate this knowledge into future planning. References Carrete, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A., Benítez, J.R., Lobón, M., Donázar, J.A., 2009. Large scale risk-assessment of wind-farms on population viability of a globally endangered long-lived raptor. Biological Conservation 142, 2954–2961. Hernández, M., Margalida, A., 2009. Poison-related mortality effects in the endangered Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) population in Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research. Janss, G.F.E., de Lucas, M., Whitfield, D.P., Lazo, A., Ferrer, M., 2010. The precautionary principle and wind-farm planning in Andalucía. Biological Conservation. Martina Carrete Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Avda. A. Vespucio s/n, 41092, Sevilla, Spain Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. Utrera km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain José A. Sánchez-Zapata Department of Applied Biology, University Miguel Hernández, Ctra. Beniel km 3.2, 33012 Alicante, Spain 0006-3207/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.041 Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 1829–1830 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon
Transcript of Carrete Et Al (2010) Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 1829–1830
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Biological Conservation
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate /b iocon
Letter to the Editor
The precautionary principle and wind-farm planning: Datascarcity does not imply absence of effects
Scientific discussions such as that raised by Janss et al. (2010) inrelation to our paper (Carrete et al., 2009) help to clarify issues inthe field of wind energy planning, thus relegating non-technical is-sues that can potentially contaminate the debate. Janss et al.(2010) recognize the value of our work as the first large-scaleassessment of wind farms on the population viability of an endan-gered species. However, these authors argue that (1) wind-farms inAndalusia (SE Spain) have been carefully planned, with wind-farmlocations chosen on the basis of previous risk assessment studies(RAS), and (2) the mortality rate of Egyptian vultures used in ourpaper to develop the PVA analysis is a local phenomenon that can-not be extrapolated to other areas of Spain. We will try to brieflyclarify these points, showing that they are based on outdated infor-mation suggesting that results and conclusions brought forth inour paper remain valid.
Janss et al. (2010) directly contradict what they advocate when,after arguing that the locations of wind-farms in Andalusia havebeen carefully planned, they recognize that the recent installationof a ‘‘huge new wind-farm” in 2004 in the area of Tarifa has resultedin high mortality rates for raptors. This shows that either the rec-ommendations made in RAS are not met or, more reasonably, thatstudies conducted were not able to predict subsequent mortality.For example, the radius of 5 km used to assess risky zones for theEgyptian vulture in Andalusia is based on studies conducted twodecades ago, while more recent analyses of radio-tracked birdsindicate that the home range for this species can be much greater(average radii of 8 km). This value overlaps with the spatial distri-bution of fatalities affecting breeding birds (6.37–14.57 km; Carreteet al., 2009). Low predictive ability of RAS may also be mediated by:(1) the use of protocols counting birds at specific points during par-ticular periods of time instead of considering changes in the spatialdistribution of the whole population of sensitive species year-round, and (2) the unknown role played by factors such as atmo-spheric dynamics or the distribution of trophic resources inenhancing mortality rates under certain conditions. Janss et al.(2010) also propose that the mortality data of Egyptian vulturesused in our PVA analysis ‘‘largely correspond to one particularwind-farm and might thus not represent a widespread scenario”.Authors explain that in areas of northern Spain where densities ofEgyptian vultures are very high compared to that of Cadiz (Carreteet al., 2009) ‘‘no studies have recorded collision mortality for thisspecies”. Both statements are incorrect and based on outdated data.The mortality of Egyptian vultures reported in our paper (from2004 to 2008) has not been produced from one, but rather fromthree wind-farms, namely Tahivilla (one non-territorial individual,2004), El Gallego (two non-territorial individuals, 2007), and LaHerrería (two territorial individuals, 2008). Also supporting the fact
0006-3207/$ - see front matter � 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.041
that our PVA models are not futile exercises in extrapolating a localevent to the entire Spanish range of the species, we report at leasteight records of death of Egyptian vultures at wind-farms from2006 to 2009 in the northern range of the species (4 in Navarre, 1in Castilla-León, 1 in Castilla-La Mancha, 1 in Valencia and 1 in Gali-cia; Consellería Medio Ambiente, Generalitat Valenciana, authorsunpublished data). The absence of prior information may have beena consequence of the less intensive monitoring of this species and ofmortality in wind-farms throughout Spain compared to Andalusia,as well as of the recent rampant increment in wind power in Spain(107% from 2004 to 2008; http://www.portalenergia.es/noticias/2009/02). Interestingly, compared to poisoning (assumed as themain cause of non-natural mortality for the Egyptian vulture inSpain), mortality at wind-farms is not negligible (reporteddeaths at wind-farms vs poisoning: Spain: 2.5 vs 18.5 ind/year,Andalusia: 1.2 vs 1 ind/year; Hernández and Margalida, 2009).
The growth of wind power is causing a greater and more wide-spread impact on long-lived birds highly sensitive to unnaturalcauses of mortality. The current framework is proving ineffectivefor planning, and the reality is that removing or reforming existingwind-farms is virtually impossible due to the absence of regulatoryand flexible administrative mechanisms (only the activity of twoparks in Spain have been paralyzed because of high mortality rates).In this scenario, we reaffirm the need for applying the precaution-ary principle to minimize the impact of wind-farms on populationsof long-lived species. At the same time, we agree with Janss et al.(2010) about the need to more thoroughly study mortality factorsin order to incorporate this knowledge into future planning.
References
Carrete, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A., Benítez, J.R., Lobón, M., Donázar, J.A., 2009. Largescale risk-assessment of wind-farms on population viability of a globallyendangered long-lived raptor. Biological Conservation 142, 2954–2961.
Hernández, M., Margalida, A., 2009. Poison-related mortality effects in theendangered Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) population in Spain.European Journal of Wildlife Research.
Janss, G.F.E., de Lucas, M., Whitfield, D.P., Lazo, A., Ferrer, M., 2010. Theprecautionary principle and wind-farm planning in Andalucía. BiologicalConservation.
Martina CarreteDepartment of Conservation Biology,Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC),Avda. A. Vespucio s/n, 41092, Sevilla,
SpainUniversidad Pablo de Olavide,
Ctra. Utrera km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
José A. Sánchez-ZapataDepartment of Applied Biology,
University Miguel Hernández,Ctra. Beniel km 3.2, 33012 Alicante, Spain
1830 Letter to the Editor / Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 1829–1830
José R. BenítezManuel Lobón
Colectivo Ornitológico Cigüeña Negra,Ctra. N340 km 78.5, Tarifa, Cádiz, Spain
Álvaro CamiñaApdo Correos 339, 28220 Madrid, Spain
José M. LekuonaDepartment of Zoology and Ecology,
University of Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain
Eugenio MontelíoPanzares s/n, 26008 Logroño, Spain
José A. DonázarDepartment of Conservation Biology,Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC),
Avda. A. Vespucio s/n, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
Available online 10 May 2010
usuario
Álvaro Camiña
usuario
Apdo Correos 339, 28220 Madrid, Spain
