Carotid body tumors review of 56 cases
-
Upload
uvcd -
Category
Presentations & Public Speaking
-
view
123 -
download
1
Transcript of Carotid body tumors review of 56 cases
Carotid Body Tumors: Review of 56 cases
Amr Gad,MD
Prof. of Vascular Surgery
Cairo University
Carotid Body Tumors
Arise from paraganglionic cells derived
from the neural crest
>50% of neck paragangliomas (PGLs)
Incidence less than 1 in 30 000
Disastrous History…1743 Von
Haller first described the carotid body
1880 Reigner attempted excision, but the patient died.
1886 Maydl attempted excision but the patient developed a stroke.
1889 Albert first successful CBT excision
1891 Marchand first description of the histologicappearance
1903 Scudder first successful resection in USA
1903 Kohn first introduced the term paraganglioma(PGL)
Till 1950s mortality and morbidity remained very high
Patients
54 Patients
( 25 y )
2 Bilateral
56 CBTs
56 CBTs
39 (69.64%)
In males
17 (30.36%)
In females
Age 42 y
range( 32 : 47)
Patients
54 Patients
(25 y )
2
Bilateral
56 CBTs
GROUP A
35(62.5%)
CORRECT DIAGNOSIS
56 CBTs
GROUP B
21(37.5%)
MISS DIAGNOSIS
(Prior trial of excision)
Radiologic Imaging
Shamblin’s Classification (1971)
I=27 (48.21%) II=22 (39.29%) III=7 (12.5%)
Suggested Modification by Luna-Ortiz et al Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2006) 263: 171–175
Dissection Technique (Periadventitial Plane)
Vascular Reconstruction was Inevitable in 10 cases(17.85%)
54 Patients
2 bilateral
56 CBTs
56 CBTs
46 Resection10
Resection +VR
Vein interposition graft 7
End to end anastomosis 1
lateral sutures 2
Vascular Reconstruction was Inevitable in 17.85% of our cases
This emphasizes the need for vascular experience among
the operating team.
A multicenter review of CBTs reported that 80% of cases
were operated on by vascular surgeons.
Sajid et al, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34, 127-130 (2007)
It was obvious that vascular reconstruction is
significantly higher among patients with prior removal
attempts (9/21 vs. 1/35, p<0.05), reflecting the
difficulties that may be encountered when operating on a
CBT that was not correctly identified from the beginning.
n=10
Vascular Reconstruction was Inevitable in 17.85% of our cases
Vascular Reconstruction was Inevitable in 17.85% of our cases
Complication Number (%)Cerebrovascular stroke (transient hemiparesis) 2 (3.57%)
TIA 2 ( 3.57%)
Hypoglossal nerve injury 6 (10.71%)
Superior laryngeal nerve injury 1 (1.78%)
Hematoma 1 (1.78%)
Total 12 (21.43%)
Postoperative Complications
Permanent 3.57%
Study name & year Number of
operated CBTs
CNI %* Vascular
reconstruction %
CVA%
Total Permanent
Studies between 1980-2000
Rosen et al (1981)15 29 28 NA NA NA
Lees et al (1981)16 41 NA 18 NA NA
Dickinson et al (1986)17 37 19 NA NA 4
Gaylis et al (1987)18 52 7 NA 13 2
Hallett et al (1988)13 139 30-46† NA 33 3-23†
Williams et al (1992)19 33 13 3 NA 27‡
Netterville et al (1995)20 46 13 NA 26 0
Muhm et al (1997)21 28 32 NA 36 NA
Rodriguez-Cuevas et al (1998)22 80 20 NA NA 4
Westerband et al (1998)23 31 13 NA 25 6
Wang et al (2000)24 36 41 24 NA 0
Studies between 2000-2010
Makeieff et al (2008)10 57 42 14 28 14‡
Sajid et al (2007)8 95 19 1 NA 1
Qin et al (2009)25 33 53 NA 30 NA
Plukker et al (2001)26 45 11 7 13 10
Papaspyro et al (2009)27 40 NA§ NA§ 25 0
van der Bogt et al (2008)12 111 21-42† 7-26† 2-4† 0
Patetsios et al (2002)28 34 46 17 28 0
Luna-Ortiz et al (2005)1 69 49 38 6 4
Dardik et al (2002)29 27 33 NA 41 4
Ma et al (2009)2 55 27 6 11 4
Kakkos et al (2009)14 41 32 10 18 7
Koskas et al (2009)30 39 NA§ 15 22 3
Ünlü et al (2009)31 28 3 NA 29 0
Paris et al (2006)32 29 NA§ NA§ 14 0
Preoperative Embolization Attractive Option Prior to Surgery to Reduce Bleeding and Tumor Bulk.
Against:
o Associated with an inflammatory response that makes precise
periadventitial dissection more difficult .
Netterville et al Laryngoscope 1995;105(2):115-26
o A risk of intracranial embolization
Makeieff et al, Annals of Surgical Oncology 2008 ;15(8):2180-2186
o It did not affect the probability of need for vascular repair
Smith et al Ann Vasc Surg 2006;20:435-9
o Can be quite tedious and hazardous.
Currently, recommended only for:
o Tumors that are large (5cm in size)
o Shamblin’s class III
o Extend significantly cranially
Kakkos et al, J Vasc Surg 2009;49:1365-73
Preoperative Embolization
Covered Stent Placement of ECA Scanlon et al, J Vasc Surg 2008;48:1322-4
Radiotherapy
Radiosensitive but “total resolution” of the tumors is rare.
Local control means stability (or regression)
Possible indications:
Minimal residual tumors
Tumor destaging.
Non-resectable tumors
Rodrı´guez-Cuevas et al, Head Neck,(1998) 20: 374–378
Luna-Ortiz et al, Oral Oncology (2005) 41, 56–61
Our patients’ showed characteristics similar to LatinAmerican series as:
● Lower incidence of malignancy (4%vs.>10%)
● Lower incidence of bilaterality (9%vs.>10%)
● Lower incidence of familial cases (0%)
This could reflect a potential genetic pattern which needsto be further investigated.
Conclusion CBTs should be resected by surgeons with
experience in carotid reconstruction.
Correct preoperative diagnosis and planning
for treatment are essential to avoid
complicated surgical procedures.
CNI continue to appear in all studies in spite
of the advances in the management and
techniques, but they present minor morbidity.
Cairo University School of Medicine
Thank You