Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was...

72
AD-A273 460 USACERL Technical Report FF-93/08 US Army Cos VIC-Based Engineer FAM (AMIP) US Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratories The Analysis of Engineer Activity in the Vector-in-Commander (VIC) Battle Simulation by Sara E. Ort Carol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers are properly represented in the Army's land combat models. . EMIP's focus was to enhance the engineer representation of the Vector-In-Commander (VIC) battle simulation. A new engineer module was designed and developed to replace VIC's original representation of the combat engineer functional area. This report documents and analyzes the new engineer module's output. 93--2,961'5 93 12 3 058 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Transcript of Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was...

Page 1: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

AD-A273 460 USACERL Technical Report FF-93/08

US Army Cos VIC-Based Engineer FAM (AMIP)US Army Corps

of EngineersConstruction EngineeringResearch Laboratories

The Analysis of Engineer Activity in theVector-in-Commander (VIC) Battle Simulation

bySara E. OrtCarol Subick ICThe Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9

(EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993sive effort to ensure that engineers are properlyrepresented in the Army's land combat models. .EMIP's focus was to enhance the engineerrepresentation of the Vector-In-Commander (VIC)battle simulation. A new engineer module wasdesigned and developed to replace VIC's originalrepresentation of the combat engineer functionalarea. This report documents and analyzes thenew engineer module's output.

93--2,961'5

93 12 3 058Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Page 2: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication,or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute anofficial endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products.The findings of this report are not to be construed as an officialDepartment of the Army position, unless so designated by other authorizeddocuments.

DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED

DO NOT RETURN IT TO THE ORIGINATOR

Page 3: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE F& OABSO

Puic repo" burden tOW Oft coNealon of intariiedon is eftimeted to average I hour per responsee. ifclid~ng lheb.w fmor reviewing instructionsa, seafc*iv% eXling dat sourcesgathe and rnid mtuining fth dmat needed. and completing and reviewing the coltdcion of inmrnSend commffenits regarding the burden eebirieaei or any oilier asecte of lIftcededlon of edonnetion. incilitng; sugigoselian tor reduiang fte burden. to Waehington Headquarters servies. Directorate for iniornaiion Operations aid Reports, 1215 JellersonDavse H~gheway, Sufte 1204, Arkngton, VA 2=22-4302. end to the Of1fice of Manageriien end Budget, Paperwork Rejducton Protect (0704-0108). Waehington, DC 20503

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Mwe*) 12. REPORT DATE F3- RE-PORT TYPE AND DATE$ COVERED

I September 1993 Final4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS

The Analysis of Engineer Activity in the Vector-in-Commander (VIC) Battle 4A 162784Simulation AT41

SE-Y21

6. AUTHOR(S)Sara E. Ort and Carol A. Subick

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONU.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) REPORT NUMBER

P.O. Box 9005 TR-FF-93/08Champaign, IL 61826-9005

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORINGOffice of the Chief of Engineers AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

ATITN: ATSE-CDCU.S. Army Engineer SchoolFort Belvoir, VA 22060-5516

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Copies are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA22161.

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAIL/CiILITY STATEMENT f12b. DISTRIBUTION CODEApproved for public 'elease; distribution is unlimited.

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

The Engineer Model Improvement Program (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehensive effort to ensurethat engineers are properly represented in the Army's land combat models. EMIP's focus was to enhance theengineer representation of the Vector-In-Commander (VIC) battle simulation. A new engineer module wasdesigned and developed to replace VIC's original representation of the combat engineer functional area. Thisreport documents and analyzes the new engineer module's output.

14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGESEngineer Model Improvement Program (EMIP) 76Vector-in-Commander battle simulation modelengineer functional area model (EFAM) 1.PIECD

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION I18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATIOIN 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF AB3STRACTOF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACTUnclassified Unci azsjfied Unclassified SAR

NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Slandard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)P eam sby ANSI Sid 2W18I290-102

Page 4: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

FOREWORD

This work was performed for the Office of the Chief of Engineers (OCE) under Project4A 162734AT41, "Military Facilities Engineering Technology"; Work Unit SE-Y2 I, "VIC-Based EngineerFAM (AMIP)." The technical monitor was MAJ David Davis, U.S. Army Engineer School, ATSE-CDC.

The research was conducted by the Facility Systems Division (FF), of the Infrastructure Laboratory(FL), of the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL). Alan Moore isActing Chief, CECER-FF, and Dr. Michael J. O'Connor is Chief, CECER-FL. The USACERL technicaleditor was William J. Wolfe, Information Management Office.

LTC David J. Rehbein is Commander of USACERL and Dr. L.R. Shaffer is Director.

Accesion For

NTIS ,DTIC TAB 4U, ,a ,norced El

J 1.[6• _t,,on ....... ...... .. .. ..

By ...........

Dis t ,, or

Dist

I3TlC f13L[' ISPECTED :5

2

Page 5: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

CONTENTSPage

SF 298 1FOREWORD 2LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES 5

INTRODUCTION ................................................... 7Background 7Objective 7Approach 7Mode of Technology Transfer 7

2 OVERVIEW ....................................................... 8

3 ENGINEER SETUP FILE ............................................ 10

4 ENGINEER HISTORY FILE .......................................... 11Introduction 11Job Records 11Non-Engineer Job Records 19Bridging Records 20Defensive Position Records 22Combat Trail Records 22Assets Records 24Supply Deficit Records 25Unassigned Mission Records 27

S POSTPROCESSOR REPORTS ......................................... 34Summary Job Report by Unit and Summary Job Report by Task Type 34Detail Job Report by HQ Unit and Detail Job Report by Task Type 34Task Performance with Organic Resources 34Detail Breach Point Report 34Detail Combat Trails Report 41Detail Defensive Position Report by Side 41Summary of Assets by Unit and Summary of Assets by Type 41Detail Report of Assets by Unit and Detail Report of Assets by Type 41Supply Deficits 41Detail Unassigned Mission Report by Side 41

6 DATABASE FILES ................................................ 48System Table 48Side Table 48Iask Table 48HQ Table 48Asset Proto Table 48Asset Table 48Asset Time Table 48Asset Job Table 49Mission Table 49Job Table 49

3

Page 6: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

CONTENTS (Cont'd)Page

JobTime Table 49Job_Segment Table 49Non Engineer Table 49Breach Point Table 49Defensive Position Table 49Defensive Position Occupying Unit Table 49Combat Trail Table 49Trail Using Unit Table 50Logistics Transfer Table 50Unassigned Mission Table 50

7 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 51

APPENDIX A: Unsorted and Sorted Engineer History File 53APPENDIX B: Formats for the Standard Engineer Reports 63APPENDIX C: Formats for the Database Files 68

DISTRIBUTION

4

Page 7: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

TABLES

Number Page

I Blue Job Records From the Engineer History File 15

2 Red Job Records From the Engineer History File 18

3 Non-Engineer Job Records 19

4 Blue and Red Bridging Records 21

5 Blue and Red Defensive Position Records 23

6 Combat Trail Records 24

7 Blue and Red Engineer Assets 26

8 Engineer Logistics Records 27

9 Blue and Red Engineer Unassigned Missions 33

FIGURES

I Summary Job Reports 35

2 Detail Job Reports 37

3 Task Performance With Organic Resources 39

4 Detail Breach Point Report 40

5 Detail Combat Trails Report 42

6 Detail Defensive Position Report by Side 43

7 Summary of Assets by Unit 44

8 Detail Report of Assets by Unit 45

9 Supply Deficits 46

10 Detail Unassigned Mission Report by Side 47

5

Page 8: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

THE ANALYSIS OF ENGINEER ACTIVITY IN THE VECTOR-IN-COMMANDER(VIC) BATTLE SIMULATION

I INTRODUCTION

Background

The Engineer Model Improvement Program (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehensiveeffort to ensure that engineers are properly represented in the Army's land combat models. The EMIPplan, published by the Engineer Studies Center in August 1988 (Larry Wright, The Engineer ModelImprovement Program Plan, USAESC-88-6 [U.S. Army Engineer Studies Center, August 1988]) outlinedimprovements to the engineer representation in three analytical models. The most important of these wasthe Vector-in-Commander (VIC) battle simulation, a Corps-level, combined arms combat simulationmodel. The EMIP plan proposed that the resulting model would be able to serve as the first accreditedengineer functional area model (EFAM), and to provide the Army with a much improved analytic tool.The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) was tasked with makingimprovements to the Engineer Module in VIC. In Fiscal Year 1989 (FY89), USACERL began toimplement the new representation of the combat engineer function in VIC. In FY90, as an integral partof the overall improvement in VIC's engineer representation. USACERL developed a standalone engineerpostprocessor to analyze engineer activity in VIC to assist analysts in their use of the EFAM. Furtheranalysis was needed to refine the postprocessor and documnt its use.

Objective

The objective of this work is to analyze the engineer activity produced by a new engineer module,and to further develop and document the use of the VIC postprocessor.

Approach

A VIC simulation was run to determine the data that must be input to the program to yield usefulresults. The output from VIC proided the data for this analysis. There were several contributors to theanalysis: USACERL researchers, engineers at the Engineer School, and maintainers of VIC at FortLeavenworth, KS. Analysis was done through telephone interviews and personal meetings. It wasdetermined that VIC output should consist of chronological engineer activity and engineer summary data.This solution was chosen for its flexibility, and for the opportunities it provides for later development ofother analytical tools.

Mode of Technology Transfer

The computer source code, documentation, and required configuration control reports resulting fromUSACERL's effort were delivered as part of the Engineer Module to the VIC model proponent, the U.S.Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Command at Fort Leavenworth (TRAC-FLVN) in December 1990.

7

Page 9: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

2 OVERVIEW

VIC's expanded capabilities for representing and monitoring engineer mission performance duringthe battle simulation generated a need for an automated tool to organize the engineer output into coherentrecords for analysis. The VIC engineer postprocessor was designed as a separate standalone program tofulfill that function.

VIC's engineer module creates two output files during the simulation of a given scenario:

***ENGR.LIS and ***ENSTP.LIS. The names for the engineer output files conform to the standard VIC

filename format ***XXX.LIS, where *** is the prefix chosen for the run and XXX is the particularfunctional data set contained in the file. Engineer activity is recorded via a chronological sequence ofrecords written to the engineer history file ***ENGR.LIS, and information to establish the appropriate datastructures for 'irther analysis is contained in the engineer setup file ***ENSTP.LIS. The engineer outputfiles are used as data for the engineer postprocessor, which generates basic reports and creates files to beused by standard database management software for further analysis.

The engineer output files from VIC, together with the engineer postprocessor, provide three methodsfor analyzing the engineer activity during a scenario run by: (1) examining the VIC output files directly,(2) studying the standard reports generated by the engineer postprocessor, and (3) using a databasemanagement system to query databases formed by importing files of standard comma-delimited recordscreated by the postprocessor.

The engineer history file, containing the chronological output from VIC, allows quick observationsof engineer events. Each line in the file begins with a letter that indicates the type of record:

A Asset record

B Bridging record

D Defensive Position record

J Job record

L Logistics Deficit record

M Mission (Unassigned) record

N Non-Engineer Job record

T Combat Trail record.

This one-letter code is followed by the side, unique identifiers, and the timc of the activity inday/hour/minute format. The remainder of the information is specific to the type of record. Sorting thisfile using the typical operating system's sort utility provides a chronological record of individual elementsaccording to the categories listed above. This is a very useful technique for anyone creating data that mayaffect engineers, whether developing new scenarios or when making excursions on an existing one. Thistechnique can also facilitate code enhancement and debugging in areas that affect engineers.

The postprocessor provides an automated procedure for organizing the information from the engineerhistory file and presenting it in a readable format. It produces both summary and detail reports for jobsand assets as well as detailed reports for unassigned missions, logistic deficits, non-engineer jobperformance, bridging activity and defensive position activity. These reports will be helpful to anyoneinterested in examining the engineer activity and results of a VIC run.

8

Page 10: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

There are 27 comma-delimited ASCII files created by the engineer postprocessor. Most commercialrelational database management systems, such as INGRES and dBASE, can import these files, whichcontain all of the information needed to recreate the engineer activity in a particular scenario. In addition,they contain a scenario-identifying prefix that allows comparison of different scenarios.

9

Page 11: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

3 ENGINEER SETUP r:LE

The engineer setup file (named ***ENSTP.LIS according to VIC file naming conventions) containsscenario-dependent information that '. ',asic to the simulation. The data items found in this file are:

TIME: Length of the scenario in Day/Hour/Minute format

MISSION COUNT. Number of engineer missions

X,Y ORIGIN: Used if scenario is offset from (0.,0)

X,Y G&iD WIDTH: Width in units, usually kilometers

X,Y NUMBER OF GRIDS: Total number of X and Y grids

NUMBER OF ASSET PROTOTYPES: Total number of engineer assets

ASSET PROTOTYPE NAMES: The FL weapon name for each engineer asset

NUMBER OF BLUEJRED [IQ UNITS: Total blue and red engineer headquarter units

HQ NAMES: The GG name for each engineer headquarter unit

MAXIMUM BLUE/RED FREE WORK TEAMS: Total number of blue and red work teams not usedin the run.

TIME contains the length of simulated time the scenario actually ran. If the program aborted early.TIME will indicate that. TIME, X.Y ORIGIN. XY GRID WIDTH, and X,Y NUMBER OF GRIDS arefor information only now, but would be necessary for establishing a playback capability. (This isdiscussed more fully in Chapter 7, RECOMMENDATIONS, p 51). MISSION COUNT, NUMBER OFASSET PROTOTYPES, and NUMBER OF BLUE/RED HQ UNITS allow the postprocessor program tocreate missions, asset prototypes, and headquarter units as permanent entities, all of which allows fasterprocessing. The ASSET PROTOTYPE NAME and HQ NAME arc used in printing reports. The numberof units created for work teams is an input data item in the global ground (GG) data module. TheMAXIMUM BLUE/RED FREE WORK TEAMS indicates the numbers of excess work teams created foreach side. With the MAXIMUM BLUE/RED FREE WORK TEAMS known, the appropriate input dataitem in the GG module can be reduced to save memory and run time on succeeding runs.

10

Page 12: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

4 ENGINEER HISTORY FILE

Introduction

The engineer history file is a chronological listing of engineer activity records. Appendix A includesan example of the unsorted and sorted records from the engineer history file. Since the tracking ofengineer effort is the primary focus, the engineer output from VIC centers around engineer jobs. The "J"records track explicit engineer task performance. The "N" records show the non-engineer or implicit jobs.Three terrain features that engineers affect and atxut which information is recorded also account for recordlines in the history file. They are: (1) bridging records (designated by -B"); (2) defensive positionrecords (designated by "D'"), and (3) combat trail records (designated by "T"'). Engineer assets are trackedby "A" records. An "L" record is written when it is determined that supplies required for the engineerequipment are unavailable. Finally, when a mission fails to be assigned, an "M'" record is written. Thiscan happen during the assignment process or when the simulation ends before assigning the mission.

Understanding how the information in these records relates to the other records is important forsuccessfully using this file. All engineer missions created during a run of the simulation will be tracked,either in a job record sequence, a non-engineer task performance record, or an unassigned mission record.The terrain features altered by engineers and recorded in bridging, defensive position, and combat trailoutput lines will have corresponding job or non-engineer records. Asset records can be cross-checked withengineer job records and with engineer unit records. Logistic records refer to specific ground units andcan be cross-checked with explicit engineer or implicit non-engineer job records in the sense thatdeficiencies are detected within a unit and for a specific task.

Following is a more detailed explanation of the record types in the engineer history file. All timesare in the day/hour/minute format.

Job Records

A line is written to the engineer history file for each stage of a job. The sequence of data on theline depends on the job status although all job records begin with the following sequence:

"J": Jobs and Assigned Missions record type

SIDE: "I" = Blue"-2" = Red

MISSION NUMBER: The associated mission number for this job

JOB NUMBER: The entity's memory location. This number and the mission numbertogether form a unique identifier for the job

CURRENT TIME: Day/Hour/Minute

11

Page 13: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

STATUS OF THE JOB: I" = Create" 2" = Activate Phase" 3" = Begin Segment"4" = Adjust Segment Duration"- 5" = End Segment" 6" = Complete Phase" 7" = Complete Job" 8" = Complete Mission" 9" = Preempt Equipment"10" = Discontinue-Attrition"I I" = Discontinue-Late Finish"12" = Discontinue-Related Jobs.

As the status of the job changes, different information is included in the job record update. Theformat of these job records is given according to the status being reported:

1 Create the job:

TASK TYPE: The type of engineer activity:" 1" = Breach minefield

" 2" = Clear minefield" 3" = Breach line obstacle" 4" = Breach obstacle complex

" 5" = Improve line breach" 6" = Repair road crater" 7" = Build combat trail" 8" = Emplace miaefield" 9" = Emplace line obstacle"10" = Emplace complex obstacle"11" = Prepare bridge for demolition"12" = Prepare position"13" = Crater road"14" = Maintain road.

FEATURE TYPE: The particular item being worked on

TECHNIQUE: Method for doing the job

RESPONSIBLE HQ UNIT: Determined by chain of command

X LOCATION, Y LOCATION: Job site

SIZE: Dependent on task

EARLIEST START TIME: Soonest engineers may begin job

LATEST COMPLETION TIME: Time job must be completed

REQUESTING UNIT: "-" if none

ORIGINAL MISSION NUMBER: May be specified in data

OBSTACLE COMPLEX NUMBER: 0 if not an obstacle complex job

OBSTACLE COMPLEX NAME: Type of complex

12

Page 14: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

2 Activate this phase:

TECHNIQUE: Technique actually being used for the job. Mayhave changed since "create" record.

PRIORITY: Number indicating relative importance of this jobas compared with others assigned same HQ.

FIRST SEGMENT NUMBER: Segment range.

LAST SEGMENT NUMBER

3 Begin this segment:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Current segment.

SEGMENT DELAY INDICATOR: 1: Minimum amount of equipment2: Poor weather3: Both.

NUMBER OF WORK TEAMS: In this phase.

4 Adjust this segment duration:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Current segment.

ADJUSTED TIME: Adjusted while reconciling asset counL

5 End of this segment:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Current segment.

6 Complete this phase:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Current segment.

7 Complete this job:

0 To be used later, skipped in the postprocessor.

8 Complete the mission:

BLANK No additional information needed.

9 Pre-empt equipment for higher priority job:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Last segment completed.

13

Page 15: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

10 Discontinue due to attrition of equipment:

SEGMENT NUMBER Last segment completedINFORMATION 0: Discontinued while processing job

1: While reconciling asset counts.

11 Discontinue when finish time exceeds completion time:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Last segment completed.

DISCONTINUE REASON: 0: Not enough time to finish1: Lack of equipment2: Delayed by weather3: Both I and 2.

12 Discontinue jobs related to mission jobs already discontinued:

SEGMENT NUMBER: Last segment completed.

COMPLETED EFFECT: Effect of engineer effort.

Table 1 shows a selection of job records. The first job is for Mission 1. There is only one job inthat mission. The task is 12, indicating that engineers created a defensive position for blue unit 11 N.It was requested (status 1: create job) at the beginning of the simulation during the loading of the data andassigned (status 2: assign job) before the simulation began. The work team began working (status 3: beginsegment) at 23 minutes into the simulation. The job was finished (status 8: complete mission) at 00:01:53(day, hour, minute); the job took 1.5 hours. In the defensive position recorcL, there will be a line showingthis position fully completed at 00:01:53 also.

Mission 10 is of task type 7, "build a combat trail." Similar kinds of information are obtained fromthe job records with a corresponding line appearing in the combat trail records.

The next three jobs are to emplace obstacle complex 15 of type COMPLEX3. A COMPLEX3 hastwo minefields and one tank ditch, all of which is determined by input data in the MF data module. Onemission (13) was created to emplace the two minefields, each being a separate job. The tank ditch is aseparate mission (14) because each mission can have only one associated task type. Both missions havethe same location, that of the center of the obstacle complex. When the first minefield was completed,the job was completed (status 7: complete job), but the mission was not completed until the secondminefield was emplaced (status 8: mission complete).

Another item to note is that the second minefield was started after the first was finished, while thetank ditch was begun independently. This is possible for two reasons. The same equipment can be usedfor multiple jobs in the same mission, with job performance proceeding sequentially. If the minefield jobswere in separate missions (which can be specified in the input data for the obstacle complex), then twosets of equipment would be sent to the site and the start time of the second job would depend on theavailability of equipment. Since different equipment is used to emplace tank ditches, the start time forthat job is totally independent of the minefield jobs.

Following the emplace line obstacle job is a bridge demolition job (task type 11). This type of jobis created when a request to prepare a bridge for demolition is indicated at the beginning of the simulationin the terrain-barrier (TB) data module or during the simulation as an external event. At the completion

14

Page 16: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

x

00

z c4

:80 0m

C',

EC, (D o4 N N

c .4 cD > 04

En~ 0 0 0 0) 0

E-. 0 o(4 QN a'

-4 0 0

* ~ 0 00 0M

c> HD( Dc

0 0,rI1

0-f -o- OIN 0- 04cic4r ne ( l 1 00.(Df

- 14 .-f44

u) In U)-4 w v-v" -V 1 4 -4 M- 4 -4L n n 14M nM(

00 Hýq1 00V4( ( n( 0 ao1.4 qn - 0 4 4- 4- 4 0 0InI4 - o a oD

Q. 00 00 0 ,co ooQ >o ooo0o0o >QQ0 o0c 0 0 CJ

o 4 c-4 4c qc4c4 o c .c 00 L'of LIv v* v wvlo oW% t o WMG O DG 4N (Nf . N OlN N ~ L NI N Iwm r 4- ' q 0c n me nc

IA cDQ LDc """. LAn LA LnL nu nL D0 O I DQ I a % Dw% a % ID a oD%

., -4q -4 -w4

.4444r4 q 0oc c> CN oN <;f m- 0 m nm n (n- 0 (n enefme- f 00 In-w -0 qv .-J 4 04ý

H~ r-44-f- INNI A nn I MOI LO(' 02020 4 - - -I ' q4- HrIH I rAH l11H IH F-rq. ('fI ,4,- H-.- HHHH l HH qH IH I-4 -4 .- f.-AHfý

tF tII' ) I

If I I .f.4.f n -4'4-f'a'4('.-INN n.I-.- .f -15f-

Page 17: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

xx

0 0zU

::) -4

80

ra

0C0n

E- Hn(

E. U

ci, 0 v

00OH

en m ('4

E.1U) C4(nLn D r O 11N mInw r c

M(n. (n 0 nmm 0 CD OD00 O 000

W l C4 N N Cl 4C4 - 0 I

I.. - It- -V -W -IV"H-r , (

CAc 0 N (1 ODO O D D0D0

C4N 4N C r n n nH

N 4NNN-1 nMM nMM(

pi H4.)D N Hfl'OP3N WP1 P) I 1

'Or')~~OONN16

Page 18: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

of the job, a bridge demolition record will be written. Once a bridge is prepared, there are several waysit can be demolished. This will be discussed in the section on Bridge Demolition Records.

Mission 22 is a task of type 3, line obstacle breach. It was created after the simulation began, whenunit 121 IN realized it would encounter a river without a bridge. The latest completion time was calculatedto be 00:05:57, which is the time that the unit would have arrived and been able to cross the river withoutengineer help. The job finished at 00:00:48, allowing the unit to cross using the river's breached delaytime upon arriving at the encounter point.

The last blue engineer job is to emplace obstacle complex 16 of type COMPLEX2 as a whole. Thisis in contrast to complex 15. When specified in the data, engineers can emplace whole obstacle complexesregardless of the individual components. To do this, engineer input data must specify a technique foremplacing an obstacle complex of type COMPLEX2. The obstacle plan for this scenario did not call forengineers to begin construction of this complex until 00:06:00, as shown by the earliest start time.

During the course of the simulation, the red engineers have engineer jobs similar to the blue side.Table 2 shows red engineer jobs created as a result of activity by the blue engineers. Missions 44 and45 are to breach the two minefields and the tank ditch in obstacle complex 15. emplaced by blue engineersand reported in Table 1. Red unit 1 I MR encountered the complex at 00:23:00 and needed engineers tobreach it before 1:06:00. The minefields were breached by 00:23:49 and the tank ditch by 00:23:43.

The last two red jobs shown involve the same breach. The first is a task of type 3, breach lineobstacle; the second is a task of type 5, improving a line breach. If a river is bridged by equipment thatis left at the site and retrieved later, a request is made fc" improvement of this breach site so that theequipment can be retrieved by the unit that owns it. However, there will be only one bridging record forcikating this bridge.

Though the records of the engineer history file are formatted to allow a simple alphanumeric sortto organize them into a usable format, simultaneous events may be placed in the sequence in an order thatis not logically consistent with their actual occurrence. For example, in the two emplace minefield jobsin Table 1, the technique used to emplace a minefield in a blue COMPLEX3 specified that the job beaccomplished in two segments. In the first emplace minefield job, segment 2 began at the same time assegment I ended. Logically, the end of segment I should precede the beginning of segment 2. However,Table I lists the beginning of segmnent 2 before the end of segment I because of the alphanumericstructure of the two records.

The job creation records appear in the erg,,.,ý,e- history fil, in the same order in which the jobs werecreated. For those created during the initialization process of the simulation, the order is due to themanner in which the input data is processed. Unit path data is processed before terrain and minefield data.Thus, defensive position jobs requested in the unit path data are ; zated before obstacle emplacement jobs.In addition, engineer obstacle emplacements are controlled by the early start times specified in theminefield and terrain-barrier data modules, and are created only when the early start time is within thecurrent engineer cycle. External events can cause bridge preparation jobs to be created at any time duringa run. Mobility tasks, such as breaching minefields and bridging rivers, are created when ground unitsencounter the unbreached obstacles.

17

Page 19: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

'. U , 0 0>HH

0 00

0

of 4

C,,

H C;

C> 14M 4

Qa C3 w m

N C4 H C C

-0 ý Q 0 -0'a L 4 0 n 4 C

1C.,

N 1 C14 C4f Mf

fn ~ ~ C 1- C4m111 l ()L HVH l14H .qH 0 qH

0 0 0 0E4

m0- 0 en( nf mmmMMe MmMmH 0~ 0 OH 000NODQ D

r- ~ ~ r0r ,r , u nu nL n Dc )Qo0oL nmi 0 0E- -Ir-fr--0Q 00

v- C- q.L noL oa% P% P% ý ,t -r -U IF

N NH 04 NH N qN 4 4NNN N -4NN

P3 H- PH P3 H1 PH ýP 1 ýý 31)P3t 1 03P)0)130313" 3t

L18

Page 20: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Non-Engineer Job Records

Maneuver units can perform engineer tasks implicitly using organic equipment. An output recordindexed by the letter "N" is written to the engineer history file whenever such a job is accomplished bynon-engineer units. The format for the non-engineer (implicit) task performance record is:

"N": Non-Engineer Jobs record typeSIDE: "I" = Blue

"2" = Red

UNIT: Unit doing the implicit job

TIME: Completion time; Day, Hlour, Minute

TASK TYPE: Type of job

FEATURE TYPE: Item working on

TECHNIQUE: Method for work

X,Y LOCATION: Job site

DURATION: Length of effort on job; delay to unit

EFFECT: Indicates amount of the job complet-ed; "1.0" = 100%, "0.0" = 0%.

Table 3 shows records of implicit engineer work. In the first record, the unit 113AR preparea itsown defensive position. Several defensive position records will be created for this position as its levelof completion increases, but only one non-engineer task performance record is created. That one recordmarks the completion of the non-engineer effort, which may coincide with the completion of the defensiveposition, or which may coincide with the unit's leaving the positiorn or being interrupted by enemy fire.

The next set of jobs is at the same location. This is the location of the obstacle complex 15 thathas been discussed in the explicit engineer job examples. Unit 12MR encountered this complex after unit11 MR, which requested engineer assistance. Unit 1 2MR had the appropriate engineer capability to breachthe complex itself. After engineers completed the job for 11 MR, the strengths of the individual elementsin the complex are reduced according to the size of the unit and the percentage of the obstacle complexencountered. After the complex is encountered, it is possible to have enough of the complex remaining

Table 3

Non-Engineer Job Records

N B/R UNIT TIME TASK FEAT TECH X Y DURATION EFFECT

N 1 113AR 0 2 42 12 1 23 539.000 -12.000 0.510 1.000

N 2 12MR 0 13 58 1 1 27 575.500 -10.750 0.100 1.000N 2 12MR 0 13 59 1 1 27 575.500 -10.750 0.125 1.000N 2 12MR 0 14 2 3 5 35 575.500 -10.750 0.250 1.000

N 2 12MR 1 13 23 1 1 27 574.575 -24.000 0.100 1.000N 2 12MR 1 13 26 1 1 27 574.575 -24.000 0.150 1.000N 2 12MR 1 13 27 3 1 37 570.325 -22.000 0.500 1.000N 2 12MR 1 13 27 3 5 35 574.575 -24.000 0.350 1.000

N 2 RENG2 1 8 0 12 1 50 544.000 -33.000 4.000 1.000

19

Page 21: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

to impair another unit. This is why unit 12MR is still needed to breach the complex. Notice that the timeit took for unit 12MR to breach the two minefields and the tank ditch is very short. This is probably dueto a small portion of the complex remaining or a small portion of the unit encountering the complex.

The third group of records show again how the sorting can be confusing. The first, second, andfourth records in that group are at the same location. The fourth record is another complex at thatlocation, a tank ditch. However. the third record is a river breaching. It was placed in this positionbecause the time and task are the same as the tank ditch, but the feature is different.

While all engineer tasks can be completed implicitly, mobility tasks are done by non-engineers moreoften than other tasks. This small data set is consistent with that. Task I is breaching minefields andTask 3 is breaching line obstacles. Minefields, line obstacles, and complexes are often unknown andbridges can be blown. So the maneuver unit cannot always plan obstacles. The first and last jobs are notmobility tasks, but they do coincide with mobility. They are task 12: preparing a defensive position.When a unit arriv" at a location where it intends to pause, it will begin to provide cover for itself ifcapable. This can be anticipated and engineer help requested, but availability of resources often makesit impossible to accomplish by engineers.

Bridging Records

A line is written to the engineer history file when a bridge is created, prepared for demolition ordemolished, whether the activity is accomplished cxplicitly or implicitly, or independent of engineers.Bridge completion, engineer preparation for demolition, and bridge demolition can be specified at the startof the simulation in the Terrain Barrier input data. Bridge completion may occur during the course of thesimulation when engineers complete a bridging task. Preparation for demolition and actual demolition canbe ordered by the external event file. The following information is written for all bridging records:

"B": Bridging and Bridge Demolition record type

SIDE: "0" = Neutral

"I" = Blue

"2" = Red

BRIDGE NUMBER: The entity's memory location, a unique identifier

CURRENT TIME: Day, Hour, Minute

BLUE DEMO FLAG: "0" = unprepared

"1" = prepare by engineers

"2" = blow when prepared

RED DEMOLITION FLAG: Same as for blue flag

X,Y LOCATION: Job location

COMPLETION FACTOR: Value between 0.0 and 1.0

UNIT NAME: Unit responsible for demolition.

Table 4 shows a sample of bridging records. The neutral bridges existed at the beginning of thesimulation as part of the theater infrastructure. Any bridge that is not neutral has been subject to somekind of engineer activity, and data fields may have changed from the original creation record. The key

20

Page 22: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Table 4

Blue and Red Bridging Records

B B/R BRIDGE TIME A FLAG R FLAG X Y COMP UN:T

B 0 9245456 0 0 C 0 0 569.000 -18.900 1.000

B 0 924;520 0 3 0 0 0 578.650 -13.400 1.000

B 0 9249488 C 0 0 0 0 569.050 -: .850 1.000

B 0 9249552 6 0 0 0 0 548.700 16.700 1.C30

B 1 9245456 0 0 0 0 0 569.000 -18.900 1.000

B 1 9245456 0 0 0 0 0 569.000 -18.900 1.000 122ARB 1 924545C ' 0 36 1 0 569.000 -18.900 1.000 122ARB 1 9245456 3 10 1 0 569.000 -18.900 0. 122AR

B 1 9245520 3 0 0 0 0 578.650 -13.400 1.000B 1 9245520 0 0 33 1 0 578.650 -13.40C 1.000B 1 92455:0 0 4 0 0 0 578.650 -13.4C' 0. 'ORPSFWD

B 1 9249552 0 1 0 0 0 548.700 16.'00 0. CORPSFWD

B 2 9194128 0 3 38 0 0 550.736 15.461 1.000

B 2 9194064 1 0 37 0 0 578.576 -13.40u 1.000

to interpreting the bridging records is to notice the changes between records for a particular bridge, whichfields have changed, and in what order the changes occurred.

The first bridge, numbered 9245456, is listed as neutral. Further in the table, four records identify-this same bridge as a blue bridge. The neutral record is for its creation in the terrain data. The other fouroccurrences mean that the blue side is interested in that bridge. The first blue record for this bridge ischanged only in the side field. This means that the bridge is to be prepared for demolition by engineers.If it is to be destroyed as soon as preparations are complete, a "2" would appear in the blue flag column.The second line is changed by including unit 122AR. This indicates that the bridge is to be destroyedafter unit 122AR crosses it. Orders for preparation and for demolition of a bridge could have beenspecified in the terrain data or in the external event file, but only the external event file can specifydemolition after a ground unit passes the bridge. The third blue record has a time of 00:00:36, and theblue flag is changed to "I", indicating that at 00:00:36 the bridge was prepared for demolition. Acorresponding record would appear in the Job or Non-Engineer Job Records, though this is not shown inthe small data set included in Tables 1 and 2 in this example. The last record for this bridge was writtenwhen the bridge was destroyed. The completed effect for the bridge was set to zero.

The next group of blue bridge records is similar except there was no separate order to destroy thebridge. It was destroyed at 00:04:00 by CORPSFWD. This indicates an external event was scheduledfor 00:04:00 to destroy the bridge. The single blue bridge record following this one shows bridge9249552 as destroyed at 00:01:00 with no previous orders for preparation or demolition. This was anexternal event to simply destroy the bridge at that time regardless of its condition and independent ofengineers.

The two red bridge records refer to two bridges that were created when maneuver units needed them.Normally, there would be corresponding Job records, implicit or explicit The second red bridge is at thesame location as one of the blue bridges that was destroyed. The Job record would indicate how long thered unit was delayed by this destroyed bridge. These Job records are not included in the sample data set.

21

Page 23: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Defensive Position Records

All defensive positions are created at the beginning of the simulation by a request in the unitmovement data, and a line is written to the engineer history file. Whenever there is activity at thatposition, another line is written. The position can be created as fully completed, partially completed, ornot yet started. Any position not fully completed generates an engineer request for completion. Theposition is associated with the unit that requested it and its position prototype is based on the size and typeof that unit. The position can be used by other units requiring the same position prototype, but only afterthe unit requesting the position has used it and left. Defensive position jobs can be explicit or implicit.If a unit is capable of preparing its own position as specified in input data, it will do so. If not, engineerswill be assigned to the task. Regardless, the following information is recorded:

"I'D": Defensive Position record typeSIDE: "I" = Blue

"2" = RedDEF POSITION ID: Position identifierCURRENT TIME: Day, Hour, MinuteSTATUS: "I" = Create

"2" = Update"3" = Occupy"4" = Destroy"5" = Saved by

PROTOTYPE: Type of positionX,Y LOCATION: Location of positionCOMPLETION FACTOR: Percent completedEXPOSURE: Percent of unit exposed when in position

This attribute is not connected properlyin VIC engineer module

UNIT: Unit depending on status.

Table 5 shows a sample of defensive position records. The first set of records shows a position thatwas fully prepared at the beginning of the simulation. Unit 11 N moved into that position on the secondday and did not leave before the end of the simulation.

The next set of four records is for another position for unit 11 N. This one was 50 percentcomplete when the scenario began, and was completed before the unit arrived. A corresponding recordcan be found in Table 1, the blue explicit job records. The unit stayed until 00:18:00. Many times theunits travel in a coordinated move. A unit will be told to proceed to a certain location, dig in until aspecified time, and when other units arrive or a particular job is comp'jtte, continue to the next location.

The next two positions are for unit 113AR. The first one was fully prepared and the unit neverarrived. The records for the second position show that the unit never left this position, which is why itdid not arrive at the first position listed. Also, the position was prepared after unit 113AR arrived. Thenon-engineer job records show that this position was prepared by the unit itself. The work on the positionis updated whenever ground unit positions are updated, in this scenario, every 15 minutes. The lastposition was prepared implicitly by a red unit.

Combat Trail Records

Combat trails are needed when the trafficability of a grid cell is poor. They are specificallyrequested in the Terrain Barrier data for a particular side and are treated as features contained in grid cells.

22

Page 24: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Table 5

Blue and Red DefensiWve Posidon Records

D B/R DP ID TIME STATUS PROTO X Y COMP EXPOS UNIT

D 1 8043232 0 0 0 1 2 548.000 -28.000 1.000 1.000 1I1IND 1 8043232 1 2 45 3 2 548.000 -28.000 i.000 1.000 111IN

o 1 8043336 0 0 0 1 2 541.100 -21.540 0.500 1.000 111IND 1 8043336 0 1 53 2 2 541.100 -21.540 1.000 1.000 1111ND 1 8043336 0 12 58 3 2 541.100 -21.540 1.000 1.000 111IND 1 8043336 0 18 0 4 2 541.100 -21.540 1.000 1.000 111IN

D 1 8045228 0 0 0 1 3 536.580 -27.910 0. 1.000 113AR0 1 8045228 0 3 22 2 3 536.580 -27.910 1.000 1.000 113AR

D 1 8045312 0 0 0 1 3 539.000 -12.000 0. 1.000 113ARD 1 8045332 0 1 47 3 3 539.000 -12.000 0. 1.000 113ARD 1 8045332 0 2 0 2 3 539.000 -12.000 0.647 1.000 113ARD 1 8045332 0 2 15 2 3 539.010 -12.000 0.772 1.000 113ARD 1 8045332 0 2 30 2 3 539.000 -12.000 0.897 1.000 113ARD 1 8045332 0 2 42 2 3 539.000 -12.000 1.000 1.000 113AR

D 2 8074160 0 0 0 1 1 S44.000 -33.000 0. 1.000 RENG2D 2 8074160 1 2 5 3 1 544.000 -33.000 0. 1.000 RENG2D 2 8074160 1 8 0 2 1 544.000 -33.000 1.000 1.000 RENG2

When the combat trail record is created, information is given indicating wh.tther the trail already existsor must be built. Unlike bridges, a unit is unable to determine the need for a combat trail when crossinginto a grid. Missions to build combat trails are generated only in input data.

"1" Combat Trail record typeSIDE: "I" = Blue

"2" = RedFEATURE: Identifier for the trailTIME: Day, Hour, MinuteSTATUS: "1" = Create the trail feature

"2" = Build the trail"3" = Enter the trail"4" = Exit the trail.

Depending on the status, the succeeding fields in a combat trail record contain different information:

INFORMATION: Create: trafficability of gridBuild: number of levels trafficability can increaseEnter: terrain traf. level of grid with trailExit: terrain traf. level of next grid

X,Y LOCATION: Create: Data location for trailBuild: job locationEnter: where umt entered gridExit: where unit exited grid

NAME: Create: trail typeBuild: work team nameEnter: unit nameExit: unit name.

23

Page 25: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Table 6 contains records for one combat trail needed by the blue side. The vegetation symbol forthe grid is "*", which corresponds to poor trafficability in the terrain relief map. The actual grid cellaffected by the combat trail is determined from the location given in the input data. At 00:03:40 the trailwas completed under the command of the blue engineer headquarters. There should be a related engineerjob record printed. The location specifies the edge of the grid closest to the engineer headquartersresponsible for the work. The trail is expected to raise the trafficability of the grid by two levels. At01:02:21, unit I I IIN entered the grid, the trafficability of which is now level 2, and never left. Unit132AR entered at 01:06:20 and took 25 minutes to traverse the grid. When the unit leaves this grid, itenters one with a much better trafficability (4).

Table 6

Combat Trail Records

T B/R TRAIL FEATURE TIME STATUS INFO X Y UNIT

T 1 9119708 0 0 0 1 0 549.000 -28.000 *T 1 9119708 0 3 40 2 2 549.000 -30.Iu0 BENGHQT 1 9119708 1 2 21 3 2 547.000 27.209 111INT 1 9119708 1 6 0 3 2 549.485 -26.001 132ART 1 9119708 1 6 25 4 4 550.475 -30.003 132AR

Assets Records

A line is written to the engineer history file when the status of an engineer asset changes. Thesequence of data included on this type of line is:

"A": Asset record typeSIDE: "I" = Blue

"2" = RedASSET ID: The entity's memory location, a unique identifierCURRENT TIME: Day, Hour, MinuteASSET STATUS: "I" = Available

"-2" = In Pretask"3" = In Transit"4" = Waiting"5" = Working"6" = Resting"7" = Damaged"8" = Left at site.

TYPE OF ASSET: Integer determined by order of the engineer assets listed in the engineerinput file

X,Y LOCATION: The current locationUNDAMAGED PORTION: The current FL.WG.STRENGTIIMISSION NUMBER: The mission on which this asset is currently workingJOB NUMBER: The job identifier for the job on which this asset is currently workingUNIT NAME: Name of GG.UNIT presently using this asset.

Engineer assets are weapon groups created at the beginning of the simulation in the front lineattrition module. Some assets are kept busy continuously and others are never used. This can givevaluable information about the scenario developed for the engineers as well as the Table of Organizationand Equipment (TOE) for engineer equipment. The command structure has a major effect on how assetsare used. Also having an effect are: what units own the assets within a command chain; whether the unitis an engineer unit or a maneuver unit; and what quantity of assets is given to the various units. Jobs may

24

Page 26: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

or may not be completed due to these decisions. If the necessary assets are not owned by the commandchain responsible for the area of the job site, the job will not be assigned. If the equipment is too faraway from the job site, the job may not be finished in time.

These problems and others can be detected using the engineer history file. It is easy to see thedegree to which the assets are used. The first asset in Table 7 has not been used since no other recordsoccur after the one for its creation at the beginning of the simulation. The second asset was used in twojobs. By cross-ciecking the mission and job numbers of the asset record with the job records, it is knownthat the first job this asset was used in, was to build a combat trail. It began working at 00:01:40, finishedat 00:03:40, and travelled to the next job to prepare a defensive position, beginning at 00:06:33. The sametype of equipment, type 6, can be used to create a combat trail, as to create a defensive position. Thisis controlled by the engineer technique data. The assets always return to their owners, and the ownersrecord their whereabouts. The third asset was used to emplace an obstacle complex. The location andtiming should agree with the appropriate job records.

The fourth and fifth assets were used on the same job, in preparing a defensive position. Noticethat, since two pieces of equipment worked simultaneously on this job, the work required half the timerequired for a similar job in which one asset worked alone. The engineer technique data specifies botha minimum number and a preferred number of assets. If less than the preferred number of assets isavailable, the job duration time is lengthened proportionally.

The sixth asset, type 2, was used to breach a river and was left at the site. At the completion ofa bridging job using a retrievable asset, a new mission is automatically generated to improve the linebreach and retrieve the asset. The asset becomes available for other missions only after it is retrieved.Since this asset does not become available again, the mission to improve breach and retrieve the asset wasnot completed. Look for a discontinued job or an unassigned mission.

The type of asset that is used to emplace an obstacle complex is also used to emplace minefields:type 4. The seventh asset was used to emplace the two minefields that make up obstacle complex 15.The next asset, type 5, was used to emplace the tank ditch, also a part of that obstacle complex. Sincethe two minefields are in the same mission, the same asset will be used. Because they are separatemissions as well as different types of assets, the tank ditch job can begin before the minefields arefinished, depending on the availability of the asset.

The last asset is a Red Engineer asset. It is a retrievable bridging asset and has been left at the site.However, the records show that this asset has become available, meaning that the improve and retrievemission was completed. This can also be seen in the engineer job records.

Supply Deficit Records

A logistics line is written to the engineer history file under two conditions. In trying to begin workon a job, the responsible engineer HQ unit checks the availability of supplies for the required engineerassets. This is after it is known that the engineer HQ unit actually has that type of supply in its inventoryand is eligible for resupply when the reorder threshold is reached. If the level of supplies on hand isinadequate, a supply deficit record is written to the engineer history tile and the job is not stanted. The

25

Page 27: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Table 7

Blue and Red Engineer Asseta

A B/R ASSET ID TIME STATUS TYPE X Y UNDAM MS JOB UNIT

A 1 9511016 0 0 0 1 4 543.000 -44.000 1.000 0 0 BENGHQ

A 1 9511236 0 0 0 1 6 543.000 -44.000 1.000 0 0 BENGHQA 1 9511236 0 0 0 2 6 543.000 -44.000 1.000 10 9739420 ENGRWT175A 1 9511236 0 0 0 3 6 543.000 -44.000 i.000 10 9739420 ENGR.WT175A 1 9511236 0 1 40 5 6 549.000 -30.100 1.000 10 9739420 ENGR.WT175A 1 9511236 0 3 40 3 6 549.000 -30.100 1.000 0 0 ENGR._WT175A 1 9511236 0 4 0 3 6 547.529 -33.507 1.000 8 8044328 ENGR_.WT188A 1 9511236 0 5 20 3 6 543.000 -44.000 1.000 8 8044328 ENGR_.WT188A 1 9511236 0 6 33 5 6 555.000 -40.000 1.000 8 8044328 ENGRWT188A 1 9511236 0 9 33 3 6 555.000 -40.000 1.000 0 0 ENGR.WT188A 1 9511236 0 9 46 1 6 543.000 -44.000 1.000 0 0 BENGHQ

A 1 9659160 0 0 0 1 4 540.490 -16.870 1.000 0 0 BENGIA 1 9659160 0 6 0 2 4 540.490 -16.870 1.000 33 8044188 ENGR__WT196A 1 9659160 0 6 0 3 4 540.490 -16.870 1.000 33 8044188 ENGRWT196A 1 9659160 0 6 27 5 4 545.500 -21.900 1.000 33 8044188 ENGR__WT196A 1 9659160 0 6 57 3 4 545.500 -21.900 1.000 0 0 ENGR__WT196A 1 9659160 0 7 25 1 4 540.490 -16.870 1.000 0 0 BENGI

A I 9659584 0 0 0 1 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 0 0 BENGIA 9659584 0 0 0 2 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 1 9261072 ENGRPWT170A 1 9659584 0 0 0 3 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 1 9261072 ENGRWT170A 1 9659584 0 0 23 5 6 541.100 U .540 1.000 1 9261072 ENGRWT170A 1 9659584 0 1 53 3 6 541.100 -21.540 1.000 0 0 ENGR._WT170A 1 9659584 0 2 17 1 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 0 0 BENGI

A 1 9659628 0 0 0 1 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 0 0 BENGIA 1 9659628 0 0 0 2 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 1 9261072 ENGR__WT170A 1 9659628 0 0 0 3 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 1 9261072 ENGR__WT170A 1 9659628 0 0 23 5 6 541.100 -21.540 1.000 1 9261072 ENGRkWT170A 1 9659628 0 1 53 3 6 541.100 -21.540 1.000 0 0 ENGRWT170A 1 9659628 0 2 17 1 6 540.490 -16.870 1.000 0 0 BENGI

A 1 9660272 0 0 0 1 2 574.600 -15.910 1.000 0 0 BENG2A 1 9660272 0 0 26 2 2 573.066 -18.513 1.000 22 9742632 ENGR__WT186A 1 9660272 0 0 26 3 2 573.066 -18.513 1.000 22 9742632 ENGRWT186A 1 9660272 0 0 33 5 2 573.245 -16.074 1.OOL 22 9742632 ENGR__WT186A 1 9660272 0 0 48 8 2 573.245 -16.074 1.000 0 0 ENGR-WT186

A 1 96C1252 0 0 0 1 4 574.600 -15.910 1.000 0 0 BENG2A 1 96'1252 0 0 0 2 4 574.600 -15.910 1.000 13 9740584 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 0 0 3 4 574.600 15.910 1.000 13 9740584 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 0 5 3 4 574.600 -15.910 1.000 13 9740584 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 0 49 5 4 575.500 -10.750 1.000 13 9740584 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 1 1 5 4 575.500 -10.750 1.000 13 9740584 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 1 19 3 4 575.500 -10.750 1.000 13 9740816 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 1 19 5 4 575.500 -10.750 1.000 13 9740816 ENGR-WT179A 1 9661252 0 1 34 5 4 575.500 -10.750 1.000 13 9740816 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 1 49 3 4 567.769 -31.257 1.000 0 0 ENGRWT179A 1 9661252 0 1 59 1 4 565.890 -45.670 1.000 0 0 BENG2

A 1 9661632 0 0 0 1 5 574.600 -15.910 1.000 0 0 BENG2A 1 9661632 0 0 0 2 5 574.600 -15.910 1.000 14 9741608 ENGRWT180A 1 9661632 0 0 0 3 5 575.500 -10.750 1.000 14 9741608 ENGRWT180A 1 9661632 0 1 27 5 5 575.500 -10.750 1.000 14 9741608 ENGRPWT180A 3 9661632 0 1 51 3 5 575.500 -10.750 1.000 0 0 ENGRPWT180A 1 9661632 0 3 54 3 5 569.580 -24.686 1.000 0 0 ENGP-WT180A 1 9661632 0 5 22 3 5 567.384 -34.214 1.000 0 0 ENGR__WT180A 1 9661632 0 6 34 1 5 565.890 -45.670 1.000 0 0 BENG2

A 2 9665948 0 0 0 1 10 582.180 6.660 1.000 0 0 RENGIA 2 9665948 1 0 16 2 10 579.670 -12.590 1.000 46 9261352 ENGRWT195A 2 9665948 1 0 17 3 10 579.670 -12.590 1.000 46 9261352 ENGRWT195A 2 9665948 1 0 22 5 10 578.576 -13.400 1.000 46 9261352 ENGR-WT195A 2 9665948 1 0 37 8 10 578.576 -13.400 1.000 0 0 RENGIA 2 9665948 1 8 52 3 10 579.670 -12.590 1.000 47 9743376 ENGR.WT177A 2 9665948 1 9 15 1 10 582.180 6.660 1.000 0 0 RENGI

26

Page 28: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

second instance occurs when supplies are transferred with assets from headquarters to the work team orfrom one work team to another. The following fields are found:

"L": Logistics record typeSIDE: "_" = Blue

"2" = RedUNIT: Unit needing suppliesCURRENT TIME: Day, Hour, MinuteSUPPLY TYPE: Fuel type, ammo type, or job supply typeAMOUNT REQUESTED: Amount neededAMOUNT ON HAND: Amount available.

Table 8 contains examples of the two types of engineer logistics records. The first two records werewritten when availability of engineer supplies was checked. BATMI is a mine and is needed whenemplacing a minefield with that type of mine. Wire is used as a line obstacle. Since these records do notappear again, either the supplies became available and the jobs were completed, or the jobs were canceled.The third record was a request for fuel, associating the record with a supply transfer. If the job wasdiscontinued, a related record will be found with the job records. If the mission remained unassigned, arecord will appear with the unassigned mission records.

Table 8

Engineer Logistics Records

L B/R UNIT TIME TYPE REQUESTED ON BAND

L 1 BENG2 0 0 30 BATMi 10.0 9.5L 1 BENG2 0 0 57 WIRE 50.0 25.0L 1 ENGR-WT170 0 16 7 FUEL 100.0 30.0

Unassigned Mission Records

The mission assignment process is not always successful. This may result from a number of dif-ferent situations: (1) input data may not have a technique for the mission type; (2) it may not be possibleto complete the job within the required time; (3) the scenario may have placed no unit with the rightequipment in a position to do the work; or, (4) the mission may have been assigned and then unassignedbecause of changing conditions with the original engineer unit assigned to the task. An unassignedmission record is written to the engineer history file for each such mission. Missions may be canceledduring the simulation because of the first two reasons above. Their unassigned mission records appearin the appropriate chronological sequence with the other engineer output records. The missions thatremain unassigned at the end of the simulation are all reported as unassigned missions at the end of theengineer history file.

Two or more records can be written for each mission. The first record has the same format for allof the mission task types and contains basic information. The format is:

".,M": Unassigned Mission record type

SIDE: "1" = Blue"2" = Red

27

Page 29: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

MISSION NUMBER: Mission identifier, storage position

CURRENT TIME: Creation time

TASK TYPE: The type of engineer activity" I" = Breach minefield" 2" = Clear minefield" 3" = Breach line obstacle"4" = Breach obstacle complex" 5" = Improve line breach

"6" = Repair road crater" 7" = Build combat trail" 8" = Emplace minefield"9" = Emplace line obstacle"10" = Emplace complex obstacle"11" = Prepare bridge for demolition"12" = Prepare position"13" = Crater road"14" = Maintain road.

ORIGINAL MS NUMBER: Identifier given in data. Not unique

X,Y LOCATION: Mission location

START TIME: Earliest time to start mission

COMPLETION TIME: Latest time to complete mission

NUMBER OF FEATURES: Number of jobs within mission

REQUESTING UNIT: "-" = None

OBSTACLE COMPLEX: Obstacle complex number, 0 = Not an obstacle complex.

OBSTACLE NAME: Type of obstacle complex.

The standard unassigned mission record is followed by a line for each feature involved with themission. For example, a minefield emplacement mission may include several minefields, with the inten-tion of having a single engineer work team emplace the minefields sequentially. The information for themission features varies depending upon the mission task type. The following list contains the informationfor each task type. Each line contains a repeat of the record type, side, and mission number so that thesorting of the file will sequence the mission records appropriately. That is, repeating the mission informa-tion keeps the records together in proper order when the original file is sorted. Obstacle complex recordsare found at the end of this list:

MINEFIELD BREACH:"..W

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Minefield type from the MF dataFRONTAGE: Length of frontDEPTH: Used with frontage to determine sizeNUMBER OF MINES: Total in minefieldORIENTATION: About the X,Y axisX,Y LOCATION: Center of minefield

28

Page 30: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

2 MINEFIELD CLEAR:

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Type of minefield from MF dataFRONTAGE: Length of frontDEPTH: Distance to cross when hit head onNUMBER OF MINES: Total in minefieldORIENTATION: Rotation about the axisX,Y LOCATION: Center of minefield

3 LINE OBSTACLE BREACH:"NI"

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:OBSTACLE TYPE: Type of line obstacle from the TB dataSTART OF THE SEG: Start of segment that is the obstacleEND OF THE SEGMENT: End of same segmentX,Y LOCATION: Location of breach

5 IMPROVE LINE BREACH:"M."

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER-LINE BREACH TYPE: Type of line obstacle containing breach from TB dataSTART OF THE SEG: Start of obstacle segmentEND OF THE SEGMENT: End of same segmentX,Y LOCATION: Location of breach

8 EMPLACE NINEFIELD:,,MW

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Minefield type from MF dataFRONTAGE: Length of front of minefieldDEPTH: Distance from front to backNUMBER OF MINE: Total to be emplacedORIENTATION: Rotation about the axisX,Y LOCATION: Center of minefield

9 EMPLACE LINE OBSTACLE:".M"

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:LINE OBSTACLE TYPE: From TB dataSTART OF THE OB: Beginning location of this segment of entire obstacleEND OF THE OBSTACLE: Ending location of this segmentFEATURE NUMBER: Identifies feature within mission

29

Page 31: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

If BRIDGE DEMOLITION:

SIDE:MISSION NUlV -LR:LINE BREACH TYPE: Feature type containing bridgeX,Y START: Beginning of the segmentX,Y END: End of the segmentX,Y LOCATION: Bridge location

12 PREPARE POSITION:

SIDE;MISSION NUMBER;DEF POSITION TYPE: Indicates type & nin size of occupying unitX,Y LOCATION: Position locationUNIT NAME: Name of requesting or occupying unitCOMPLETION FACTOR: Used in determining effect.

Obstacle complexes combine minefields and line obstacles. The information collected and reportedabout the individual features is slightly different than if they were not part of a complex. An obstaclecomplex mission can be completed as a whole or can be divided into separate jobs. For example, consideran obstacle complex that contains five anti-tank minefields, 10 directional mines, six barbed wire coils,and two tank ditches. This complex could be emplaced in one job with an emplace obstacle complextechnique. A second method is to break the mission into four jobs. If the mission is not worked as awhole, there would be a minimum of four jobs, because different features must be worked separately; onefor anti-tank minefields, one for directional mines, another for barbed wire, and the last for tank ditches.Another option is to further subdivide the tasks of any of the feature type into smaller missions. Forexample, the barbed wire coils can be divided into two jobs of Lime tasks each. Any such grouping ofsimilar tasks is allowed. It depends on what the scenario developer determines is appropriate.

The BREACHER/EMPLACER MISSION NUMBER of the obstacle complex data in the MF datamodule is used to determine how to separate the jobs. If the mission is to be emplaced or breached asa whole, the BREACHER/EMPLACER MISSION NUMBER will be the same for all the features.Otherwise, the numbers will be the same only for the features that are to be grouped together in singleefforts. In all cases, minefield and line obstacle features cannot be in the same job unless the obstaclecomplex is worked as a whole, in which case the individual features are not seen. When an obstaclecomplex mission is unassigned, the B/E MISSION NUMBER can give added insight into what wentwrong. Technique, timing, equipment, and command chain data are still the areas to check forexplanation. However, knowing how the mission was to be worked suggests whether to look atemplace/breach obstacle complex, minefiel, or line obstacle data.

1 MINEFIELD BREACH:

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Minefield typeFRONTAGE: Frontage and depth together determine the sizeDEPTH:NUMBER OF MINES: Total number of this featureCOMPLETION PERCENT: Aides in determining the effect of the complex as a wholeBREACHER MS NUMBER: Determines how the feature is to be breached

30

Page 32: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

3 LINE OBSTACLE BREACH:

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:LINE OBSTACLE TYPE: Type of terrain barrierFRONTAGE: Length of segment.COMPLETION PERCENT: For determining effectBREACHER MS NUMBER: Determines how the feature is to be breached

4 BREACH OBSTACLE COMPLEX:"N.

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Minefield typeFRONTAGE: Frontage and depth together determine the sizeDEPTH:NUMBER OF MINES: Total number of this featureCOMPLETION PERCENT: Aides in determining the effect of the complex as a wholeBREACHER MS NUMBER: Determines how the feature is to be breached

8 EMPLACE MINEFIELD:

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Minefield typeFRONTAGE: Frontage and depth together determine the sizeDEPTH:NUMBER OF MINES: Total number of this featureCOMPLETION PERCENT: Aides in determining the effect of the complex as a wholeEMPLACER MS NUMBER- Determines how the feature is to be emplaced

9 EMPLACE LINE OBSTACLE:

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:LINE OBSTACLE TYPE: Type of terrain barrierFRONTAGE: Length of segmentCOMPLETION PERCENT: For determining effectEMPLACER MS NUMBER: Determines how the feature is to be emplaced

10 EMPLACE OBSTACLE COMPLEX:

SIDE:MISSION NUMBER:MINE TYPE: Minefield typeFRONTAGE: Frontage and depth together determine the sizeDEPTH:NUMBER OF MINES: Total number of this featureCOMPLETION PERCENT: Aides in determining the effect of the complex as a wholeEMPLACER MS NUMBER: Determine the feature is to be emplaced.

Table 9 contains examples of four unassigned mission records. The first record is a blue missionto improve a line breach. The job and asset records show that this mission was also to retrieve theoriginal bridging asset. The mission was not canceled until the end of the simulation. This indicates the

31

Page 33: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

technique, equipment, and personnel were present, although the latter two may not have been in therequired tactical area in time.

The second record set is also a blue mission, to emplace a tank ditch that is part of obstacle complex15, type COMPLEX3. In this complex, there are two minefields and a tank ditch that were emplaced bytwo engineer missions. The EMPLACER MISSION NUMBER is three, which indicates this mission isone of at least three missions. The complex needed to be emplaced by 00:02:00. Since this mission wascanceled at that time, it can be assumed there was not enough time to complete the mission.

In the next unassigned mission records, red unit RENG I requested the preparation of a defensiveposition. The mission was created at the beginning of the simulation but was not assigned within therequired time.

The last unassigned mission is for a red unit to breach an obstacle complex containing a BATM3minefield and a BDIRM minefield. The mission was canceled immediately after being created. This mayhave been due to one of many reasons: either no technique was available, or no unit with the correctequipment had the work site in its tactical area, or the work could not be fiaished by the requested time.

32

Page 34: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

m (N

u 0 0

o U U n a C

0 0

E- 0 -Z-ý 0

E- ~ U

0 ~1 C)o

(D Q C> 0 C>CU-

ONN

a..

0N CD 0> 0 C>

-W~ -!i a

Ln 0

0D 0 C ) xc) >

El E.0 0-W0 :

0a. . C3

Lf0 En I n CD fl I

o o en l 0 0

C> In C,

eC H

lz R

0) w 0D CN %D%0l 1%

H W q W l 00 eq -$0

ko (N N 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 00m ON m m~ a, O~C N ONO

-~ H H H (N N ( 4 (Ne

33

Page 35: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

5 POSTPROCESSOR REPORTS.

Included here are the standard reports produced by the postprocessor from the data found inAppendix A and discussed in the previous section. Appendix B contains titles and headings of all thereports available through the postprocessor.

Summary Job Report by Unit and Summary Job Report by Task Type

These reports give a summary of the jobs (Figure 1). The first report displays each engineerheadquarters unit, summarizing its jobs by task. The second report summarizes the jobs by task withoutthe unit breakdown. In addition, it provides three other types of information that do not appear in the firstreport. The summary of each task includes the total number of jobs that were generated even if notassigned. This would include any jobs in the unassigned mission report.. The total number of the jobsthat are part of an obstacle complex is also included in this report. At the end of the report, a summaryof the mine emplacements is included.

Detail Job Report by HQ Unit and Detail Job Report by Task Type

These reports list detailed information about each job (Figure 2). The jobs in the first report arein order by headquarters unit, then by task type. The jobs in the second are ordered by task type and thenby headquarters. Because of the amount of information available, some attributes that appear on the firstreport do not appear on the next, and vice versa. The reason for canceling, the priority, the number ofsegments, and the last segment completed are reported in the first. The second contains location, size,assign time, and arrival time.

Task Performance with Organic Resources

Organic resources are those owned by a maneuver unit. This report (Figure 3) displays non-engineeractivity. Not as much detail is possible with non-engineers, since it is used for a low resolution level ofplay.

Detail Breach Point Report

This report (Figure 4) displays the chronological activity relating to each breach point. Theimportant fields to consider are the unit, the completion factor, and the flags. A new unit means that unitis responsible for destroying the breach point. The completion factor will decrease to 0.0 when the bridgeis destroyed. The flags indicate the bridge has been prepared for demolition by the blue or red side.When a bridge has been destroyed, a new breach point is created if it is rebuilt. Typically, it is destroyedby one side and created by the other. To determine if this has happened, look at any breach point thathas a time greater than the beginning of the simulation. Compare the location with any breaches that havebeen destroyed by the other side. The location does not have to be exact. In this scenario, two bridgeswere destroyed by the blue and two were built by the red after the start. Only one of the red bridges wasrebuilt from a destroyed one.

34

Page 36: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

lul M -

ZI Z

I~~ z -

E' m EZI N'a( )C aXZ ( )c

I 3 0 1 0-Z 0 '

I ) WIN

ID NE' NE' L n mL

Z E-C4' -

0' 00

U''

z Z

0' z~ I)z(

z 00'w "..I

w NE. P U .A u

EI 0 0 0'"z

pa M I a4C~.- xC I"W

0" Z a~wmL 04 U4W

I ) MO~~ E 1-ZNf

N5

Page 37: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0 w

* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a i .0 DI -0 fi)~

C) a C>) CI CD C,0 ) C

W E. Ci D I ý C)C DC>C.E i >M z I o

* I I*u I u

*ý c. ý! r L L*D0 )0cýc - o I Z Iýa'

* I 1- I=

OH 0 4 0 V

wi I KIE4 W r4 1 E

W E, M rI

TA Z I

I l En In

4 EA

I Di WWI -1-4

*~~~C I iI E

I) WMWI Mz mM M H 00 ý

4 00 z 0

M M WE- W WW Z 4I

I ~WI I ~ 36

Page 38: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Oul I ul

ZOI4 )I z A I I Z M I

irI' W0D 'D mm

E. c. ~ I m-H~ CDC DO Da ,

C! 7 ý " I PýI. ..C -r

0 Cj 0 0 -V flýD 1 0 m o

"Ir 'I~ D H I4 HI-Mflf HoLnL L o 0Ln ID

f- ZO WO OIZ rr-- I W I

I UW o~l wo :lI

U En L)V]I u E

I- : 8 " IU

0~~ 00 I. I..

E. EI M m m IW. W H n mI

lm W .. w , ww -0- vL

Z- W EWI E-4 II 0O

0 E- c 0

uf I*.. 0 I*** C> CD cI D

10, C>leo C 00Q00> , 0 C000

I E,4 E-I

HI HI HI Q E4W 1 0C ,C)C D0

I> 01 01 a mm

I C ,(I a1 HD 0I I>cý

I) WOII z En z I

I oe 00 0 0 1 004 C 0I'

00 0 1 - 0 ý I- 'A00 H1 4-

W. z W ý3 lF U 00 u

uHH 0 iw.1.44

.- EA 'H rIfP<.u

I I X 100 cWH oI crJ0mIc En0 ~ Io1 u a ZX3c0 M CA 0H O

I0 I I rJ3 z oo0

1 0 U ~ 0

1WX 0 0 I 0I10 H I w HO , m HW I

10 OZ 0 OZI I0 0~ r4 m0 OZI

37

Page 39: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

ww. ww. w(4w WW; WQ

*uI uZ u~ u u L

*W (.24w 1 W r W (.2 (.2 wW

* ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 C* ~u c~ u u u u

-1 1 a, (0 ý 1 1

"I E-14 I~o I"- E4 E

4 4-IZI~~~ .. 4- .. 4-I -C.- <-E . ~ N -E

I c> c I c>

(12 a C0N0-

u) W m. I 100 10 u ) En*c 0 0* I IC>

* I -0 N0

o 0l - IN

E* I I I, H0 - I "

4 I,

n 0 ,r> 0 1>2131 14o

13 ZI Zý , = Z' I 4I 'r

0 m. E-4 ' H E. P, E-4 E' Pia a. CU, U. Uý a. U4 a. U'

PQ H m 0/ m, 0,0 M 0,0 0 r 0, On 00 u 0i u1 0 10 uI 4I 4'l 041 n 0

E- P i/ H (-4 1 p 111 "E1 IE4 "E HI.

*4 WI E.a~ E, ZE l. ~ ~u) 0E Hn E i In H I l 11 H) El H) E HE

44 E0 IlE l

4~~ 0 0~o

E44 WN I I m

4Im H "0 H 0 H 00 HQ4 H I H

x [4 ZE4 I P41 U~W E-4 IW UW IýI U E4 ýEu 0 o~HNI0

4n I*. MI' t

z I~ IY I I z IO I x f w O I

w I w w : W (4 W W 3

04 lz Z' H' H4 W' H' H' 0"mH'W "M " t.3 I ca NI NI NI NI NI WNI ý ow 3 c

4 0 m 0 I m 0 z m o I a OZ I

4 I I~ D"~'4

DI~ I38

Page 40: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

CH 4z H' C C ý D

IQ "~ In

c) 0 ýoc )0c

0 Ij

U ~ ~ ~ T (' (D4 ()'4r l ,r

U0 0OLn 01 00 00 UnL nu n

U I 0m m~U

0~ 0

1-4 r~14 xX

0 I I 0 I

f :2 :: C

U I ZI

0 03. 1.

I 0i w01 lw 1-

EI UU H- UU

Hj I "Hg "c

H1m UI-41-.

E4 NwHNNHm ~Zu)Z~

I U)Iuu I

R P4R R Wcn Hi IQC mr

OD ON 04 MIDr-

I I UUj ~-4 I1 4 -

I I

I I I 39

Page 41: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

I .0

Ic clIo~ ~ ~~ C I . - 0 H .ý0 I ~ H-

NC 0

zI zýz '!-H H. I

oD i) I 0 'D'

0n Ln<Dm (n~ -oc

LrI IA In In I n

I X ý c' c' 0o 0n 'UE

.4 IH.-4 1011 ON v I

NA IN N) alo

0 I 040

Page 42: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Detail Combat Trails Report

This report (Figure 5) is a chronological listing of the building and use of combat trails. The timebuilt is a real time, while the time involved is an quantity of time. The trafficability level is the levelwhen the unit first became involved with the grid. If the level is less than the engineer effect, the unitis probably building the trail. The engineer effect indicates how much improvement (i.e., the increase intrafficability level) this type of trail will provide.

Detail Defensive Position Report by Side

This report (Figure 6) is also a chronological report that shows the use of defensive positions. Thepositions can be requested, built over time, occupied, and destroyed. They can be occupied by units ofdifferent prototypes if this is allowed in the input data for position prototypes. The last update shows thetime when work on the position stopped. The first completion factor shows the value at the last update.The time occupied shows the amount of time the unit used the position. The next completion factor showsthe value when the unit entered the position. A unit can enter the position before the work is completedor stopped. The exposure factor is not connected at this time. It will always read 1.000 for the occupyingunit.

Summary of Assets by Unit and Summary of Assets by Type

These two reports (Figure 7) provide the same information organized in a different way. The firstsummarizes the asset types owned by each unit. The second summarizes each asset type. The totalnumber of each asset type is given, followed by the averages for each one of those types.

Detail Report of Assets by Unit and Detail Report of Assets by Type

These two reports (Figure 8) provide the detailed information of each asset organized in a similarway as the summary reports. The first report lists each asset owned by the units. The second lists eachasset of a given type.

Supply Deficits

This report (Figure 9) displays the instances of a lack of supplies for the engineer assets needed ona job. If the supply type is fuel or ammunition, the job was already assigned.

Detail Unassigned Mission Report by Side

This is a listing of all the missions not assigned during the simulation. The missions are listed bytask type. Each task display& different information about the features in the mission, with differentheadings for each task type. Appendix B shows the headings for all the task types. If there are nomissions in a task, that task is not listed. Sometimes an obstacle complex has been divided into more thanone mission whose task may be breach/emplace minefield or breach/emplace obstacle. If one of thosemissions cannot be assigned, it will be reported under emplacing or breaching an obstacle complex. Atthe end of each task, the total number of missions in that task is listed.

41

Page 43: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

cgO

4 4l

Oii

16.

0c

I 1r,3

p

424

Page 44: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

00E

-4 4

0 U' ' 0 I Ui( 1ý 1

U I4 U (.4 "Ii-

I ý Ut E Ut

I 0 Ot

I . IocN

I, cWI (J-4 m in

0

I 'L l -I- - LIý 14 I4 E

"i I) " ( I I 3

En _ I I4 I W0n I-4-I 0 C4

E..U I c> U) a.

I 0 L) 1 0 u I

E, E-IW Zui E-'il

z z

C) rU . 4 . C>OU

inI I I C

0ý H> II I

I cI IIDc

E-4I

I 01

0 1 n iI nL I --I

I~ ~ ~ Ioc o o1

I 43

Page 45: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

44

4 z

4 z

0 0

> >

E" I l

44 E

QI E" 4 "&I

f. E 4I

En F4

44

w x~ 41 z .W

m " 04 ý

4 >.> "

I IZ 4 U2

4 0 4.2

m 44 t12 w

U)) EnW '

E-4

In I

44 I

Page 46: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

cl- r- E-

uI t .>

° W

00

° IS° I

410

4r-

*l X

M °

E-44

E-4 :-H

0 InE

18

E-4

a9*

* I

**

A. W !

E-"]

m 0

441

I II

45~

Page 47: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

tn 0 no~ 0 cm

1 0 'w n 0

P. cu

I 02l-to >

46

Page 48: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

IW : : DC

0 x0..i I C; ý o

In I~ In a

~r In~ZZn z zi

a C>

C) 100W

R1 0

r- Z0 C)I I

In 0 1 I; 01

aI >El CI Q

I 10 ~ I 1

E0 E- CD~~

EI 0

0 l) In 0 I ln

z:2 02 a,WI~~~-4 01 2 I£I

I c> I II

zl~ 0

In HHIU >I/ I I I Cl ) I Il)

Z 0 Z C)Z m cs

CI 1- 03 1- I,4

E- Ell 1: I4 H I W 4 WI- -I

I I~ ~ i W I E-H1**HE-4

C> 104H .C .)

I l~ E", E:

HI HI a H HI

m Ol n H OfI .I O

PO H0I w 0 C41 Hm1 0 HW HI4 i 0i

0' I C)93ý H i C' H C4

0 0 0 0 4

a H4 OR 4l 4 Aý. I 1 .4 M) 4im I0 E 0 u 0 10 zj1

47

Page 49: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

6 DATABASE FILES

The Engineer Postprocessor program creates ASCII files for use by a database management system.These files contain a copy of the data structure found in the postprocessor, plus a prefix that iaentifies thescenario. This prefix allows for comparisons between scenarios. These files were created to be used withINGRES, a relational database management system used by Fort Leavenworth. Since Ingres refers to itsfile structure as tables, these files will be discussed as tables. The DOS filename for each file is thescenario prefix plus a two- letter abbreviation of the table name with ".ing" as the extension. A completelisting of the data items and stnuture for each file can be found in Appendix C.

System Table

The System Table contains the data from the Engineer Setup file and other scenario-identifyinginformation.

Side Table

Non-engineer missions, logistics records, defensive position and combat trails are kept in setsaccording to the owning side. The side names and the number of records in each of these sets per sideare kept in this table.

Task Table

The task name and the number of assigned and unassigned missions for each task are kept here.

HQ Table

For each headquarters, the name, side, and number of entries in its inventory and mission list setsare recorded in this table.

Asset Proto Table

The name and number of assets of each prototype are in this table.

Asset Table

The basic information about each asset is in this table.

Asset Time Table

For each asset, this tables contains the time the asset was involved in the eight status positions:available, pre-task, in transit, waiting, working, in rest period, damaged, and left at site.

48

Page 50: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Asst Job Table

This table identifies the missions with which each asset was involved.

Mission Table

This table contains the unique information about each mission.

Job Table

The basic job data is contained in this table.

JobTime Table

This table contains the timing information kept for jobs: assignment, activation, completion, anddiscontinue.

Job_Segment Table

This table contains the data on the segments of each job.

Non Engineer Table

Information relating to non-engineer jobs is stored here.

Breach Point Table

All information recorded about breach points is in this table.

Defensive Position Table

The basic data about the defensive position itself is found here.

Defensive Position Occupying Unit Table

For each defensive position, this table contains data about the units that occupy that position.

Combat Trail Table

The basic data about each combat trail is found here.

49

Page 51: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

Trail Using Unit Table

For each trail, this tables contains information about each unit using the trail.

Logistics Transfer Table

Information about transfer of engineer supplies is kept here.

Unassigned Mission Table

The unique data about each unassigned mission is kept in this table. Information about each featureof the mission is kept in tables according to the mission task:

Minefield Feature Table: Minefield Breach, Minefield Clear, Emplace Minefield

Breach Feature Table: Line Obstacle Breach, Improve Line Breach, Bridge Demolition

Obstacle Feature Table: Emplace Line Obstacle

Position Feature Table: Prepare Position

Trail Feature Table: Build Trail

Road Feature Table: Repair Road Crater, Crater Road, Maintain Road

Obstacle Complex Feature Table: Breach Obstacle Complex, Emplace Obstacle Complex

50

Page 52: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

7 RECOMMENDATIONS

Combining the engineer history output file, the postprocessor reports, and the database files givesa great deal of flexibility in analyzing engineer activity for a given nrn of the simulation. The standardreports and the database files provide a considerable amount of data about engineer job processing,resource allocation and use, and workload distribution. Other areas need to be explored to realize the fullpotential of the information to be gathered from the enhanced engineer representation in VIC.

Some areas involving engineers are not tracked as closely by the engineer module as others,including: minefields, obstacle complexes, line features, attrition, and logistics. These are monitored intheir own modules (obstacle complexes being a part of minefields) with separate output files created. Nomethod has been developed for tracking cause-and-effect relationships to measure the contribution of thecombat engineer effort. For example certain questions remain unanswered: "Did a minefield emplacedby engineers hinder the enemy in any way? If so, how and to what degree?" The output files for thesemodules contain tables and other information not readable by the VIC postprocessor. An INGREStranslator has been developed to translate these files into useable information. A similar tool is neededfor accessing the data useful to engineers. The data obtained from an engineer translator can be combinedwith the information in the ASCII database files to enhance development in other directions.

The development of a database management system for engineer analysis is another direction toexplore. A complete and user-friendly system making use of the ASCII database files would allow studiesto be examined simply and quickly. It could also facilitate the training of personnel in performing modelstudies and developing data.

Another direction to pursue is the development of a graphical playback program for the engineermodule. This would give a visual representation of the engineer activity in VIC that would show theactual execution of the model. The engineer-specific playback feature should be built to concentrate onthe crucial elements of interest to the engineer analysts. The VIC postprocessor already has a sophisticatedplayback capability, but it contains no engineer representation. Working with the personnel at FortLeavenworth to capture the engineer effort for VIC would enhance the knowledge of both the engineerscenario developer and the VIC scenario developer.

51

Page 53: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

APPENDIX A:

Unsorted and Sorted Engineer History File

53

Page 54: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0~ ~ 000 Q

0ý ,-3 () fL) 0D <

cLoc CDL 0 C

C>~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C)C I n C Y ,C ) oI

r-( r- t.-- r-( r- r-r 00 coJ r- comc

000 01((l *OD f 0 40r4t~ Z " ýr oý ý " 00 0 (N4z .- 44 040m4(N .00 4--'a' Z0 74- ix, , M

0000 0m 0m 0c 00ou 0 ou

a cD 00c0 0 00 0 0 ýa c 3 aC > -ovC 3mmC w rr-.- .- 00 00 00 (N-4-. -4 00 ("I co C c m n r-~ mNm

00 00 0 00 00 00 000 00 00000 V 0n 00l 0oo ) C D

ON 0. V w-q l --4

o0 '0 00 0 0 Q4 '4 0040000In040In0 mn (N .-,m a c40H~~~~~ -1 'A-'0-4 -I

a~o~ m 04 w 000~(N.C c: 04 Cm> ~ I (D " ' N ((O a

I n f>l>cc C c C c l 0cnc>a r )t cD uc0I an InOclýl C.C DU DC > Da c ý c

( , (N .ýac n -4 - nI -inc> - I . -r -

c>C n Inca naawcoaa NImaa )mooaaaDCC ,Ca nac0 DcC n m0 -wC) (m lo fl4 ('In

c~mmm aN (N mN mN( mm

0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000

W400n(N00(40I(N0040~W((N( W(N n In In In r0~N(4 0WNNNNNNNN ((( rN(N r(

0In( (Nmm Nmm( m~ThN(N( mm 'i In Imn m m-N r r- mmN

c>0 al ~ 0404040>40404 In 0.00

00 mmr'(( NN- N ~ 4- -c(N

co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (( c>( aN- C)( CN( 0N c3 a 3(N(c >C D( DaoNac >c ýc >o 3ncDc ýac >ac ,c ,InL o II ý Dmmmm

.- 40 00 ( .4 -4(N N N N ( ( '4 N ( ( ( - (N(N(N.-4(N.4(N(N N N N -4 N -4(N N N N N ("( " ( "N(N(NnNMN N MN N M( ( ( M

C)c ý ýc C >c)c > )4 ac D )0CIac c :,c D )C ) ýI> )cýC CIC c )c>c > Dc C >cýC D54c C >C

Page 55: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0

E-4

-4 14 -1 -

~0

m0 OD OD li ~ 0 " 0)(N 0n 0n 0 00 ID 0 0

eq~ C. CD C. C 1

00ý 0 0ý 00CDC

0~~~~C 0 0ý 00 .0-4N.40.4-

00CýC 0 0 C0 0 0) 0) C> 0> 0) 00 000 N)r->C>a.

C>.- ,- - -4 .-4 .-4 .-4 .-4 0 ,- -4 -4.-40a 0 C- 4 -0-4 0) C

ýwC 00 0 0 0> 0) 0 0 0 N- 0> -V 000 0000 0>C .C )CNO N) U > 0 l U Ln LA in U') 0) Ln U, r-L C'N0 ON O 0-r C D

4W CD 0% 09.0 0, 0 0 0> 0D C) .-1 04 (N( C;,( 0N'4 1D( N M

!C! r LA Ný 19 U, U, V, U, 0 Ný Uný !O , 9',!. .- W0 090

r-O U, U- r ,-r r , U, r r ) Dr U, U,) In N m, m-U0 -0(000m0m

C4 LAI 0I D r N caC

-1.

M0 en% DC DC DO (Nr ." -TC NM 7 -.- 4. >r,0 Na N14mm nf ,C :L-4 r ,C>C

m Mm l 10 W40-W v A-W V UUU NmU 4mm, - w wv w o ,Ln(n- t L n nUnUnnL E,0~WU'CI WU.r.m lOI .- ( 1 J(n-w"

0> 00 0 40 C) 0D 0 0 0 0 H 14 -4-4-4- 4 -444 4 -4-4 H-4 ýI ,-l ýI -4-44 -44-- .-4 H I H N r0 c (a " c( 4 rq (Nm

Cl 0000CýýC,000 000 0000000000000000000ýa C a C)Cý 0 C) 000 00 000 00 0> 0) CD 0> 0) 0ý 0D( )C DC DC 3C DC 3 C >aC

C'4M % C4C4C4 4- -4(N1(0 . 'N - r- WI ((14W "W"WI)"WND" 0( 4W OMNW "W M "r M W n C> "'40W N M 0m r-0Nmr, mm mm '0U U, w omw w m w -4 U,0 o m-1U 0 ,"-MH ,.M-4 14 0 m NN ( N CD r -O r -r M, m M (N m M U

a ' n0c,4 c) em " v4 010 .A O D-400 -400 C>Q C0C 4- -40O 0M n 0 a-I Da-40 H40 - - -4 4CM .-i Ln N " nUmIOmLA Ln

m 0% 0% 40,0 NNNNýmChm 7 40% ma ,(1a ai N ONNN ONN ON a, O(NNmON N(amONN NN m O N((4DDNC) mON 0m40 (N mmmw0 wC

C'4 (Ni C4 N( C- .4a 1-4 -Il -II -j r 4 1- ,-. ~-i 1-44 .- 4 -4 -4

r4--44---4-4--4--4-4r-4 r -4-4- ý Iý-4 4-ý4 -4-l4 -4 -41--------444444444-444-4-4-4-4-4--4-4-r---I4-4-1-44-4 -4

1- P3 W3 0- 43 P3 0 .ý3~40 4 03 43 n-4 0 0j 0 4 03 3 0 0 4 03 03 0 03 4 3 40004 0 400z

55

Page 56: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0 000u ouuu

~-4 1-4 "-

Q 0

0D 0 ID %0 ID IDL

'A '-

'-4 1 C, zP-4 m0 wZ 0 w

00 C 0 w w wa WO 0 0D 000 0C00 co O mC >i

004 0ý .-4- m

0l OD 00 0D -4(a

CC)m 0 a

C) -D 0 0 n mO 0 0(N> at 00.>-4 .- 4 " CA 'J 40('m m ( m-4 .- 40 000> C)

C.~~~~ 00 0C) C ) >

C>00- C) C),- C) CD4 (N C)a.-( C 4 C- 00 0.-i4 >C>C>C

a 0 C C . 0 CN a > Ct t ) c L lC

C>~ ~ ~ 0> '4 1-1 a(N liC > ýC

,_4 . 4 .3 *.- 0. 40>

00 I ý C00 00 00 000 0000 r,040>0 D-r wL n CaC1D ,mý C W0 , D 0O ( 0a' 0.I.-4 O OCOaO4NO' '

r4lu -4 mN 01 1- C% (N (N3 InC)C 40CPC : 1 41 41

LnAL

ifir I, I~q r'U rý r--

OD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( "I m % C Na C C 41 ýC DC (N a r-

0,(N .-! ,4 I 4 mýL ýM (

(N ' 7n ý c m4 .- - -1ýr

a ; N -000 n0 0q -4 o- m0 0( 00 N NnN-r- , mn 00~CJ 0 0U ,1 D ,Ll U, 40%'0V)% -w( Nmo .C ;m Ln - ,aac r- - r m (N "NN-UUUUU( mý C>n~ r- r- 104'-

Ln ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( mn (N ('1 mn Lnm mmm 000 n L v L > LnL nt o nL(n - .4( (N (N, (N ( N( N( N( N( N( N( N(

00 W0000 0000000 00000 0 >0 u" 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 .-4 .-4 .-

14 -4 ý4 rU, -4 -4 - -4 r,,4'aN~ r-moOnoOro mmmM r OO11 -1 Ma

4rdOl00 440 m-i4mmm m.4,-

CDaC m -4 11 m M4000444.-.4.-.4444

a'a'a'oar- ODM -I M C1 CVM M a'1 rl 'a'wDaM a'- ODa-4D A -4 A m m a'a'a' r-afn'a'0 ID4r-0w inOw '-'w'a'o4.14

00 00C DC -r -r -r ý na m wwm"r ,aac nL nt nL m m m m m mm m-~( en w D

-4.4 ,4-4 m m m m mm .- 4 -4 .- 4 4N....... N...C......

CýC C .C3C C Da D C C , )C C c D D0a >C aC ý ýC C )C)C . ýC C )C)C :)C )56 4 4-

Page 57: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

CD "0

ON N% N, r- , ,U W~ C-DI 00r DO O 0 a 7,a --4 Hý (. H H . - -4 4 .14 -4 1

H CN14w H c0 -

N1 N1 )0C )0C 0 DC DC ýO 3D 0D (3 0D 000 O0-m00 Wf00U, U, N- HO NNN NNN mw4 " 1 DOD0N-m m~ 11 0D -" -W m nm ý 14-i. CD 00

%D ~ ~ 0D 0W 0m W- r q- W W

00 0) 0>

CD~~ ~ C> 0D 0o H C:,0 0 0 ~ m 00 ~ ~

14 0 0 0 04 0 q 0' 0404 C>C DC 5C DG bC >e ýC >-0V 0V 0C0 0 0D 0 00 141- m O OO O OO 0 00 0

0) 0D 0 DC D a 0ODr .a0 0 0>C )C D DC ,C 0 0) 0 C>f Cg 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

V- a ND 4D 000N ý C> 000 ,f) n0000C C -C ý4 0 0 0 0 OH OHH 00 0 WO OO O O O O O N N

m ) C > 0 O ,4- , 0 a, -W CD 0> 0>C >0ý )C Dr 0 C) r- NO 00 HH ,0 0OrO-W

I I I I I I 1 .10 1 C)0 C o 1 1 11 1 1 I 1 1I 1 lii1i 11 1

Ný 00 0 00I I 1a.N, 9 nq C,

0% OD OD 00. coOI *ý IV~N N> c or > 0 nc)c -mL ne >(>L nc )0

C%4 LN t > V N ) 0%0 0W C, , -WUH rý r-U t* . - C> .

N U, U,0 UU -4-4N N N N

CD V),UU N ý- N

U,4 N -N I', I

ýq1 -41 4- ý- 4141 41 - 4- 1 4ý 1 4H 4 4 N4C1 4C D ) H> )0C 0D0C D >C )CDC >(O ~ H H H U

OD ~ ~ C4C N0 4N * 4% DC 0% 4COO ý % DO OI DC 1 D% Dw D% o% D0C )0C >v-r--wO U, Nw Hn- nk nL - ý% or ) -r -t r -4MMMMf MM()MM% DW 0I D0 0O

m~ ~ ~ HnO Nm( nmr Ar qr -- ,f 7 D DC>Cj""C 1 4C4"C 44- 4- 4L nL

wO%0O%0-0 0 r- r- r- 2 r- %I ,I~ m 0000H4 ,0VD%0' '0 00V~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H0 Hw H0V1 V VAvv v 41 4

. . HH .H.r4H "HHH - HHHHN .HH. H. ..H..HN H -000000-4 00H0- 0-000-0"-00000- 0 4,

4 P 4 3 4n M t3 0 F4 0 E0 E0 Z0DD0 NN t, 0 4Z ZZ 0Z44 I00 44 44

~'nU,~,'UUNNO0NI0'0 N ~NWNN ' 0 D'57W

Page 58: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

00 000 CoW C.C>%6%%%0%%mm m m 0 0000 LA:)L C : InnIn

(N 000 ( - rN ( -000 W r rN r- 00 r- r- r- l 000 OD OD OD 0000D 0% a, (N r-0

4 .- 4 -4 4 (NN( 00 00 0 4 4 4.--41--4 -.- 4.-l 4- ri 4 4- 4 ý

I' I~'( NNN 4 IN NN N NNN (N4( N)I

0%~ ~~~~~~~~~ O%%% 666 O6O6 %%6 i%% 6

009H.9 C4 X I I Iu 00

r4 . D C C C 00 C I I 0C>w W 0 0 ww C 0C>0 wn C,(: C 0 o I 00

00 0 00 0 MO)IM ON ON 00 00 00 (A a,0 00 a% 00a %Io NO %0%0%0%000 0 0 0 00 0 0

~C 9

. . . .b .b . . . . . C m In m LA LA LA m 0 00 H > LA LA vA 000 n C, La W( Nr N 0 wb w Lw Wý r- C' nW ACNcl C Hý 1 HýlHýqý- 1 4(N IV4.4H- IV- w -WC ' (

l0 f C.1 11 1 -0a( )- D0C >C D0C )0C I C> 11 C. C, 40i 0 (D Cii 0 C.4 C)I D0C >C. )C DC .)C >C ) CC >C

0000000000W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CC: o~ LAL 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 WW0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW0006% 6% 6% 6% 006% 0W W C W 000000000W 6% 00000 O W 6% W N N N N N C 0 LA LA 00000 LA LACLAO ,eC>NC0

S LA LA LA LA LA LAL AL AL AL A AL AL AL AL LA] LA LA LA] LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA

IN~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IN 'A " 14 H4 INI 4H1 4H1 lH"H 44- 1- w- HCM 44444 1

00004, v 0w0 0

en en N) 000 tAov en en NOW Ww -wn Lb 000 LA 6% t- 6 -w -w vi 6 000 N % - n (N a, OWN OD N ON cLA NC 000000WChC% DO 00 e 00 C> ND 0D LA

(NLA.-4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ý (NL.- -4,4en A -4e LA N LA en H LA-4 -4 n ('e

vi mb Lb q' ('4 (N ('n (4 r'4 N 4 N e In N - c, LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA en en en en en en -en en 0 M M LA (N-tALL AL N NL N en e

In LA LAW W W W> W W r- (N wN wN (n wN c N (o N -w (N (N -w (N (N N (N WD W W- W -w Wq -w 6D 6 -6 4 t- 6 6n 6 > (D LA c- LA c a c3 LA LA LA LA r- 0 > n("6 6%6 %6%6 %6 6 0 0 -4 " Hn 4 IN( C1 Hn IV v H44 v H 4 uH H n H 4 In H4 H- H LA LA LA LA4 LA LA LAL-AW %L L AL AL A ne

LA LA LA4 LA LA LA LA LA LA W> W Wý W) W Wo W> W W. W> W- W1 WA W4 W4 W4 W> Lb W W W W Wn WD W W0 Wý W Lb W W1 n C 0 CD CD I C V M r

Co W W> Lb W> W W> W W WDI W W W W > W , W W> W > W WD W ) WD W W W W W W W WD W WD WD W W W W W W W (N (N (N (N (N (N (N (N (N (N (N (N H CD 00

-W 6W 6% OD 6D OD OD CO M% C63 C64 C4 6% r4 r4 C4 r4 6J 64 64 C4 C,) C4 6J 6% 64 C4 64 r4 r4 N% 6%J %1 OD 6D CD CD CO M% OD W% CD CO 6% 6% %D 6% 6D a% CD. C% 6% CD 6% L4 L

H4 ̀ H H H H- H H H- H- H4 H- H- H- H- r-4 Hq H H4 H4 H H H HI H- H H H4 H H4 H4 H H H (N (N (N (N (N (N (N 000C>0 H -I H- H- H H H H (N (NH

4 Ic4o c4l <l c4l c44o 44441 c44l - <l - . m mP m mm mIMm mmm wm a a

58

Page 59: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0 0

on o L LA 0

-44 4- -4 4 -" 4 -

C4 r'f 0 ,

oý o 00 ýC 0CD lC 0 0 0

Ný9- !- ' 'ý99( 0 C0 0 C)

OO000000 0 0> 0> 0 a 0

4) C OO 0 0 000 C ) r 4L-0 0 0C>0*00 -0r > 00 0 0 0 0

-. .4 .4 . . .~ . . .- .4 .- .- .'- . . .

b cq4 4c q0 a . 0 O 0 - 0 0 'Ao 400 ;C3C

0 0

I.-41 4V .C- 4C3C4CQC1 nmý 4C 4 0 A0 00

C.ggggggg 000001 ,C.< C lC o0C )C Om' C> 0 Om'(DC DC .C ,C >< = .00 0 O 0D C0C Ln M

14P qý DCh0 AO m( -W .0 0%N *4 LA .LA 0-0- 0- qmmmmmmm- t- Vr 0 o 1ýr- 0; NLA- 44no1C O .- r-4 04 C ,-4 0; r-%D r-ILn nL nA nL ULA nLA nLA nLALALALA Ln N LAn r nL n

-4 r-4 -4

'-i 4 N1 C l i ONmor 0 4 C m 0>

.0w , mm mD ODO

Nl N- M C1 m m mn m m m~ m~ m '-4 -1 4

N ClM m m

N- No OD W-4 -4

r-4 C4 en ~-W N# e 4 m' N- v Nv Nv -4 m r4 1-4 N l mLoW NW .l0-4 Nl mn L) %D rW ODH -4 en en m LA DA r- r -i m en LA LA D0 NW co 4 m LAW D W r -c 4 " mn LA D

0> MC 0 0 Nj 0 N 0 LA 0> N 0 LA 00 o mom m en( m 000000000 % ý .ý 0 0 % 0 % 00% cn W Nc, 0 M- -0 m 0% 0) 0N C, - -4 -4-40 C> ýnw m m(Ln , C1 -0 r. 1 -4m NLA iLA Ln A- - -W Ir .- 4-(-4 14mm- 0 0I -NLo )LA)LAL -4m m

0 -4CNWQ 0 O m.4MN NN ON "WO 0 0 .-4 .4r.4 -400 -4 m 0-4-4-4-4-4 -4-4-4-4- -4-40-4A-4-4-4-400000D(:-4 -4

CD000) ý00ý00CD0.00C000. A 40C.> 0 0 0C0000C)C0000C,00000DC0CCC>00C)00>0 000c)0C0CD000 00 0 00C000 C

(0D0(%0 WD0 W N . N N N NC 000 N N N4 N- N4 N4 N4 0 00000 OwIV10 V IV 0 -V -0 %000 % a% 0W k0( w w m m w w N N N N NM Mm M N N1 CV M M M Cn M (0( ND ND ND Ný Ný Ný Ný N, N N N N N N WWWWWWW .- - 4-Hý 4 H C40)0Q0O00 mm mm mM nen M ""M M M M M4 -4 H0 000000 C> c) v~ v~ v v -v LA LA LA LA LA LA LAW w w m w w m(w(0(0(0w(0(w(0(0(0 %D0w0mmmmLALALLn nLALALn ALAvvv r 4 4-4 m 0 m m 0 0 00000000o0 0a000C.0 00-4-4 H-4 -4-4-4 N Nl N N N

0 -W -V v .0 v NW N0 v (000( ( -W. cOrf' ww% ww% m e m m' (', m rnw-0 ýw -0 10 -W -W lw -V- W- I . -F W- W 10W0000C>DCD0 000C.00 00 000 N N N N Na N, N% Ný N' N- N- Ný N- Ný N- N- N- N- t- N- N- N- N- N- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

COC W0 CD OD OW WD OD CD 00 CD WD D W WD a, h a%O NM ( 0% CA 0A ON 0% a% (A 0 0% 0% 0% (70% ON0 ON0 0 0% 00% 01(01 00111111% 010 11% ONO0NONo N

,4 -4 H-4 .4 rl4C.- a a(00 Cý0000 M' M MMMMMMMe en m: mr mr V m m r -4 4. , r-4Hr4 -4 -44-4-4-4 -4 -4-4 -4-H 4-4r-4 -4-4r-4 -4-4 -4 -4 A-ir-4 -4-4-4 NA N N N N

1-4 -4-14-4q - H-4-4-4-4-4 -4-14 N N N H----444 -4 --4-4-H 4-4-4-4- 4 -444 1- -ý 4-I 4 -4--4-4--4 V 1 14 4 r-4 -4-4- 14-4- 4-4

00 00 0 00 0 f-001 3"P 3ý 3P 3ý 3PIý 3"r 3 1 3ý - 7 - P-3rt- r2 ý3 P3 P-J)

59

Page 60: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0 0 0 0 -

o) U U

L.3w fl fl0 0 -w

-4D

4.4 (N4- (4r-4

-4 m

o~~ 00400

c1 4 -14 OD (N (N4 ý

0ýwL0c 0 00

%D,-4 4 11 1

01 0) 03c >cýr Dtn~~* 4,, )c a >c 7 r -r -

L9 ~ ( (N (Nc ýL ýLýc ýC n C

c;~~~~~~~~~ (Nm c n cýL ;c qO ; C

0 0

m m 4 4 4 -4 14- 04 0-- ve q- - l 4mc 4 0-14 m n1 - 4 mm 0 -4 A

004 0m

C> U4 1-4 0n

-4,- 0.- UZ 0WO44-4(4- ~ l 0

r- CD(Nqr n ot o- j n\ -c -4 cm %t--4 m ný -m-4 " n -w 4 oo r-4 m m flOw r-O

f4N3 Ifl .A( .f ( .f 0 4 r 4 ca " ( 4 c~ ~ 4 c , c

0ý c> a C,4. C..- cýr 0> C).~ 0) (Dc >c N >Qc aoc )c>c )ao .C >( ac > 4 -4 g- ý 4- 4- 1r 4ýC >afj14C

(N C13 0q Cq CNri"WC DC DC DC3C N r (N CI 0N 4l l . NCjC3 DO DC DC 14 (~ - N C14 0NcjwW% zD% D cacjc

Iqr qc ý "04 V4-w 4r- wlwýr.4 ,-4 ( N -I N-4 rA -1 1 H-I C*4-) m Imm'A 4C 4-4 -4 -l-4 m M mm-M4.m-w\D-4

0 0 PC

m 04N c N 14 (Na nm( 4-v 4w-4 4r- v1 w1 f"-v Ir VwV- v1 4 rw - wý w-

04- 4- A" - 4- 4- - 4 1- 4C 4"C4r 4CjCj"C S .- I r4 Vc4 ( IV'j(1 4 r ~ jt 4r4 r-4 1 l 04ý3 t1P7ý 3 2ý ý 3e! : 3 O"t7 1 3 3 ý -jý ý 3r t3"r "ý -4 1ý3t2 r

NW( DN NC~U NW 4( N~4( NW 4( C*4 t4 0 ~-(N-IJ4DN60-4

Page 61: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0D 4C 0 0

02 0CD0 CD00CC,5, D

0 .099 ,0 0co-C>C

0 r41 4 4¶

r4 p o000000 t>00 00

0 LA 00 00

0ý 14.4C!C!.C4LA14r0 0 0 C D ýo 0

4 4-40 00 00 00 0 3000

eq C. > 0 - .0 C4.0 C'

,o DLn Ln

000 LA C, LA W.0000uv 00 ; g. mL n nVv0 00LnL n

m~ clAALAU, r-r- r. r- -Ln

enb r- [r Ln r*- r- r- Ijn 0

-q 4 -i -4-4 1 4 LA .4

(D C

14 ý44C ).

fn %0 %0 (D D CD D C 0 >

C4 N0 N0 N1 No ND N % 0N M C

1-4 -4 -4-- (4-4 C4 -4

61

Page 62: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

APPENDIX B:

Formats for the Standard Engineer Reports

63

Page 63: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

a4 w E",

*u I

44 I 0 4 I

0 x 4 0 4

I~~~~Z 4 I4 I U*E~~ : IIWI

EN 4

4 04

WI 444 E.

w 4 I W 1 41IW Z W~-I u: 1

E1 01-I -El I 14 I 01 4L

4- I 41 I I I 4I ~ I

ElI 0

44 WE I a E

104~ 11 RI", X Hi 1 40 1 F1

0: 0 4, 04 U) W: 4 I:

0 41 wRm41 X I IW

I 4 I E-I 1 I E-4 ZI 4 I 4 0 I0 4 E- I~ ~ 1 4P H 1 (~ 4. I 4 I 4

0~ 14El

1-EI 4 401El 4WII

WI 4l P - HI 4

P4 : W t)H 4

4 ~ ~ ~~~~~ I 14 I4 I E-I4

I ~ ~~ ~~~~ z z . : : HI 14 ~ 0I ~ 4 I I1401

a I P4E 4 I0 41 m aI~~~u 0 E4 0 zI4 I Z

I 4 I £' 4 I HI 4 II 4 64

Page 64: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

4 4

01 0 "

* V4

ix 4, Wix 4

~> 1- 1 E~

I- 44 E, E, 0I4I

I) 4n I HI 4 W I

E- 9 p : : rM -

:0 0 E- ~0I 1 I4 4 v W I

4i I a U) I U24I > H I > H

I- OU 4 I 4 ul w I

w 0~ 4n 0 EI EI 4n E- I4 ,

I 1 r4 Ha. I 0

I I 4 H I 4 Z I E-IW f

E- El 1 4 EI

4 ~ I4 H 4 W I 4 44

I 4 E4W I 4 CflI 4 WI I 4 W

I 4 Ei4lII U H ~l 4 ~I O~I4~ I ~ : Q

~~~ En 1 0 4I ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W E

I 4 I 4 I0I F4 ~ I4 0

I I 4 I H I 4 II) 4 I .- I 4

o W I

~ ~I. ~ i :M

4 I ~ I 1 I 1 1 05

Page 65: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

0-0

41 ZO 4

I 2 <

4 i 0

I Oi

C, E 4 4 .IHE-i I ~ I I I 4 i an

~~: zzA

e-E-i * E.E~l 4 I

4 4 I 4 4 4 COI 0

44 E" 0

m E, Eý C-

E" i iE -i i

0 Wn

w I 4 a ia'EO

44

ZEi E- 0 " E-

04 04 E 4i

3&'i U) CI) ivEi 4 .s i

M H 5 E-Q I I

F4 Wi4z WI 4 C

>4 0" 4 E-4i 4 0 IW ICl0

E. E. P2

En i 4. HEn IIH

4~~c E C) I O

I AI 4 CO iS iO

4P iE4

0.E -o 4n u). I u)-s E- I

W 44 a H4 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ i E 4 4 i-)S H il

>Hi ý iý ZuH E4 i i

4- 1 4q I I 4 I ~ i ~ i DW

ix mi

M 0 E -nH C-n H Eai

4 I66

Page 66: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

E-i

c0iI

Di4

Ea

ElUHW~

>00

z a'

r4 W

HI 0 o I

0 I 0 00

.4 I

a~ ~ ~ u 'a-

I E-. 67

Page 67: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

APPENDIX C: Formats for the Database Files

SYSTE TABLE - BY-ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, IEN.SCENARIO.NAME T 130, IEN. SCENARIO. TITLE T 130, 1EN.HISTORY.FILE I 2,EN.REPORT.FILE I 2,EN.SETUP.FILE 1 2, ~,*EN.OUTPUT.FILE.NAME T 20,EN.RUN.TIME D(6,3), ITB.X.ORIGIN D(8,3), ,,

TB.Y.ORIGIN D(8,3),TB.GRID.WIDTH.X D(8,3),TB.GRID.WIDTH.Y D(8,3),TB.N.GRID.X I 3,,TB. N. GRID. Y I 3, IEN.LAST.OF.BLUE.HQ I 4,EN.LAST.OF.RED.HQ I 4,,N.EN.ASSIGNED.MISSION 1 4

SIDE TABLE - SILING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5,.SIDE 1 3, .

SS.SIDE.NAME (.SIDE) T 17,N.EN.SET.OF.NON.ENGINEER (.SIDE) I 4, "'

N.EN.SET.OF.LO.RECORDS (.SIDE) I 4,N.EN.SET.OF.DEFENSIVE.POSITIONS (.SIDE) I 4,,N.EN.SET.OF.COMBAT.TRAILS (.SIDE) I 4,/

TASK TABLE - MSING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,

.TASK 1 3,,EN.TASK.NAME (.TASK) T 17, U

N.EN.SET.OF.ASSIGNED.MISSIONS (.TASK) I 4,N.EN.SET.OF.UNASSIGNED.MISSIONS (.TASK) I 4,I

HQ TABLE - HQ.ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5,.HQ I 2, U

EN.HQ.NAME (.HQ) T 18,EN.HQ.SIDE (.HQ) 1 1, 1,N.EN.HQ.INVENTORY (.HQ) I 4,N.EN.HQ.MISSION.LIST (.HQ) I 4,/

ASSET PROTO TABLE - AP.ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5,.AP 1 3, ,

EN.ASSET.NAME (.AP) T 18,N.EN.SET.OF.ASSETS (.AP) I 4,/

ASSET TABLE - AS.INO

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ''

EN.ASSET.ID (.ASSET) I 8, 1"EN.ASSET.SIDE ý.AZSSET) I 1, "1,EN.ASSET.TYPE (.ASSET) 1 3, ",~EN.ASSET.NAME (.PROTO) TS 15,'EN.HQ.NAME (EN.ASSET.UNIT.ASSIGNMENT (.ASSET)) T 16, '~

68

Page 68: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

EN.ASSET.UNDAMAGED.PORTION (.ASSET) D(5,3),EN.ASSET.DISTANCE (.ASSET) D(7,2), ,

N.EN.SET.OF.ASSET.JOBS (.ASSET) I 3,/

ASSET TIM TABLE - AT.%NQ

EN .DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,U

EN.ASSET. ID (.ASSET) I 8, *,,EN.ASSET.TYPE (.ASSET) I 3, ,

FOR I = 1 TO . .NUMBER.STATES.ASSET.ARRAY (I) * 24 D(6,2).. COMMA T 1,*..BLANK T 1,

There are currently eight states: available, pre task, in transit,waiting, working, in rest period, damaged and left at site.

ASSET JOB TABLE - Uj. IN

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,

EN.ASSET. ID (.ASSFT) I 12,,EN.ASSET.MISSION.PTR (.ASSET.JOB) I 4, ,

EN.ASSET.JOB.PTR (.ASSET.JOB) I 12,EN.ASSET.JOB.X.LOC (.ASSET.JOB) D(8,3), ,

EN.ASSET.JOB.Y.LOC (.ASSET.JOB) D(8,3),/

MISSION TABLE - MS. ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, 0,0,.MISSION 1 4, U,8,

EN.MISSION.SIDE (.MISSION) I 1, 1,,EN.MISSION.TASK (.MISSION) 1 3, N,N,EN.MISSION.FEATURE (.MISSION) 1 3, ,

EN.MISSION.HQ.UNIT( .MISSION) I 4,,,EN.MISSION.ORIGINAL.MISSION (.MISSION) I 4, .

EN.MISSION.REQUESTOR (.MISSION) T 15, ,

EN.MISSION.EARLIEST.START.TIME (.MISSION) D(8,3), 0,0,EN.MISSION.REQUIRED.COMEPiETION.TIME (.MISSION) D(8,3), 0,0,EN.MISSION.COMPLETION.TIME (.MISSION) D(8,3), 0,0,N.EN.SET.OF.JOBS (.MISSION) I 5, ,

EN.MISSION.OC.ID (.MISSION) I 4, ,

EN.MISSION.OC.NAME (.MISSION) T 15,/

JOB TANLA - JB * ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,

EN.JOB.NUMBER (.JOB) I 12, U

.MISSION I 4, ,

EN.JOB .TECHNIQUE (.JOB) I 4,,EN.JOB.X.LOCATION( .JOB) D(8,3), ,

EN.JOB.Y.LOCATION( .JOB) D(8,3),EN.JOB.SIZE( .JOB) D(9,3),EN.JOB.PRIORITY( .JOB) D(9,3), ,

EN.JOB.NBR.SEG (.JOB) 1 4, ,

EN. JOB. COMPLETED. EFFECT (.JOB) D(8,3),EN.JOB.DISCONTINUE.REASON (.JOB) 1 4,upN.EN.SET.OF.SEGMENTS (.JOB) 1 4,/

JOBý_TIMU TABLE - JT. ING

EN. DATA. BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,

EN.JOB.NUMBER( .JOB) 1 12, ,

EN.JOB.ASSIGNMENT.TIME (.JOB) D(8,3), ,

EN.JOB.ACTIVATION.TIME (.JOB) D(8,3), ,

EN.JOB.COMPLETION.TIME (.JOB) D(8,3),,"EN.JOB.DISCONTINUE.TIME (.JOB) D(8,3), ,

.MISSION 1 3,/

69

Page 69: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

JOBBSEGNT TABLE - JS. ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, "5

EN.JOB.NUMBER (.JOB) I 12,g,.EN.SEGNENT.NBR (.SEG) I 3, ""

EN.SEGMENT.BEGIN.TIME (.SEG) D(8,3), ""

EN.SEGMENT.END.TIME (.SEG) D(8,3), "

EN.SEGMENT.DELAY.TIME (.SEG) D(8,3), ,

EN.SEGMCENT.NBR.WT (.SEC) I 2,EN.SEGMENT.DELAY.INDICATOR (.SEG) I 3,.MISSION I 4,/

NON ENGINEER TABLE - NE. 1KG

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ""

EN.WEJ.UNIT (.NEJ) T 15, ,

.SIDE I1,,EN.NEJ.TASK (.NEJ) I3, ""

EN.NEJ .FEATURE (.NEJ) 3~ ,,

EN.NEJ.TECHNIQUE (.NEJ) I 4, ,

EN.NEJ.X.LOC (.NEJ) D(8,3), ""

EN.NEJ..Y.LOC (.NEJ) D(8,3), ,

EN.NEJ.END.TIME (.NEJ) D(8,3), ,

EN.NEJ..DURATION (.NEJ) D(8,3), "~

EN.NEJ.COIIPLETION (.NEJ) D(8,3),/

BREACH POINT TABLE - BP.IN1G

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ""

EN.BP.ID (.BP) I 12, ,

EN.BP.X.LOC' (.BP) D(8,3), ,

EN.BP.Y.LOC (.BP) D(8,3), *"

EN.BP.SIDE (.BP.ACT) I 2, ""

EN.BP.TIME (.BP.ACT) D(8,3), ""

EN.BP.UNIT.NAME (.BP.ACT) T 15, ,

EN.BP.COMPLETION.FACTOR (.BP.ACT) D(8,3), ,

EN.BP.BLUE.DEMO.FLAG (.BP.ACT) I 2, ""

EN.BP.RED.DEMO.FLAG (.BP.ACT) I 2,/

vEFENSIVE POSITION TABLE - DP.ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ""

EN.DP.ID (.DP) I 12, ""

.SIDE I 1, ""

EN.DP.PROTO (.DP) 1 4, ,

EN.DP.X.LOC (.DP) D(8,3), ""

EN.DP.Y.LOC (.DP) D(8,3), ""

EN.DP.CREATION.TIME (.DP) D(8,3), ""

EN.DP.LAST.UPDATE.TIMVE (.DP) D(8,3), ""

EN.DP.DESTROYED.TINE (.DP) D(8,3), ""

EN.DP.UNITNAME (.DP) T15, 61"tEN.DP.TIME.USED (.DP) D(8,3), *,*,EN.DP.COMPLETION.FACTOR (.DP) D(8,3), ,

EN.DP.EXPOSURE.FACTOR (.DP) D(8,3), ""

EN.DP.NUMBER.SAVED (.DP) D(8,3), ,

N.EN.SE'r.OF.DP.OCCUPYING.UNITS (.DP) I 4,/

DEFENSIVE POSITION OCCUPYING UNIT TABLE -DU. 1MG

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ""

EN.DP.ID (.DP), .SIDE 1 12,",,EN.OU.NAI4E (.DP.TJNIT) 1 1, ""

EN.OU.PROTO (.DP.UNIT) TS 15,"EN.OU.ARRIVAL.TIME (.DP.UNIT) I 4, ""

EN.OU.COMPLETION.FACTOR (.DP.UNIT) D(8,3), ,

EN.OU.TIME.OCCUPIED (.DP.UNIT) D(8,3),I 70

Page 70: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

EN.OU.EXPOSURE.FACTOR (.DP.UNIT) D(8,3),/

COMKBAT TRAIL TABLE - TR. ING

EN. DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ~"EN.CT.ID (.CT) 1 12, ~..SIDE I 1,EN.CT.TYPE (.CT) T 5, ,,

EN.CT.X.LOC (.CT) D(8,3),,EN.CT.Y.LOC (.CT) D(8,3), UU

EN.CT.X.JOB.LOC (.CT) D(8,3), ,EN.CT.Y.JOB.LOC (.CT) D(8,3), *~EN.CT.BUILD.TIME (.CT) D(6,3), UU

EN.CT.EFFECT (.CT) D(8,3), U

EN.CT.GRID.TRAFF (.CT) 1 2, U

N.EN.SET.OF.CT.USING.UNITS (.CT) I 4,/

TRAIL USINlG UNIT TABLE - TU. ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5,U,,EN.CT.ID (.CT) I 12,UU.SIDE I 1, 1 U

EN.CU.NAME (.CT.UNIT) T 15,U,,EN.CU.ENTER.TIME (.CT.UNIT) D(6,3),UUEN.CU.EXIT.TIME (.CT.UNIT) D(6,3),UUEN.CU.X.ENTER (.CT.UNIT) D(8,3),UUEN.CU.Y.ENTER (.CT.UNIT) D(8,3),UUEN.CU.X.EXIT (.CT.UNIT) D(8,3),UUEN.CU.Y.EXIT (.CT.UNIT) D(8,3),UUEN.CU.TRAFF.LEVEL (.CT.UN'IT) I 2,/

LOGISTICS TRANSFER TABLE - LT U lG

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5,U ,

EN.TRANSFER.TIME (.LO.REC) D(6,3),EN.GIVING.UNIT (.LO.REC) T 12,UUEN.RECEIVING.UNIT (.LO.REC) T 16,U,,EN.SUPPLY.TYPE (.LO.REC) T 16,UU

EN.AMT.REQUESTED (.LO .REC)D(,)EN.AMT.ON.HAND (.LO.REC) D(8,3.),/

UNASSIGNED MISSION TABLE - UK. 130

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5,U,,EN.UM.NU1MBER (.MISSION) I 12,U,,EN.UM.SIDE (.MISSION) 1 11 U1,U,

EN.UM.TASK (.MISSION) 1 4, ,U

EN.UM.ORIG.NBR (.MISSION) 1 4U, U

EN.UM.METHOD (.MISSION) 1 3, UU

EN.UM.REQUESTOR (.MISSION) T 15, UU

EN.UM.START.TIME (.MISSION) D(8,3),UUEN.UM.REQUIRED.COMPLETION.TIME (.MISSION) D(8,3),UUEN.UM.CURRENT.TIME (.MISSION) D(8,3),UUEN.UM.X.LOC (.MISSION) D(8,3),UUEN.UM.Y.LOC (.FISSION) D(8,3), ,UN.EN.SET.OF.FEATURES (.MISSION) 1 4, UU

EN.UM.OC.ID (.MISSION) 1 4, UU

EN.UM.OC.IJAME (.MISSION) T 15,/

MINEFXELD FEATURE TABLE - NP.ING13

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, UU

EN.UM.NUMBER (.MISSION) I 12, UU

EN.MINEFIELD.TYPE (.FEATUJRE) T 14, UU

EN.HINEFIELD.FRONTAGE (.FEATURE) D(9,3),UUEN.MINEFIELD.DEPTH (.FEATURE) D(9,3),UU

71

Page 71: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

EN.MINEFIELD.ORIENT (.FEATURE) D(9,3), :,,EN.MINEFIELD.X.LOC (.FEATURE) D(9,3), , ,EN.MINEFIELD.Y.LOC (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ",,EN.MINEFIELD.NBR.MINES(.FEATURE) D(8,3), ",",.TASK I 4, /

BREACH FEATURE TABLE - BY. ING

EN.DATA.BASE.PREFIX T 5, ,,

EN.UM.NUMBER (.MISSION) I 12, ,EN.BREACH.TYPE (.FEATURE) T 12, ,

EN.BREACH.X.START (.FEATURE) D(8,3), s*

EN.BREACH.Y.START (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ,'"

EN.BREACH.X.END (.FEATURE) D(8,3), •,•EN.BREACH.Y.END (.FEATURE) D(8,3), g

EN.BREACH.X.LOC (.FEATURE) D(8,3), •EN.BREACH.Y.LOC (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ,,

.TASK I 4, /

OBSTACLE FEATURE TABLE - OF. ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ",EN.UM.NUNBER (.MISSION) I 12, ,

EN.OBSTACLE.TYPE (.FEATURE) T 15, ,,EN.OBSTACLE..NBR (.FEATURE) I 1, ",,EN.OBSTACLE.X.START (.FEATURE) D(8,3),u,EN.OBSTACLE.Y.START (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ",

EN.OBSTACLE.X.END (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ",,

EN.OBSTACLE.Y.END (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ",

.TASK 1 2, /

POSITION FEATURE TABLE - PF.ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,

EN.UM.NUMBER (.MISSION) I 12, "EN.POSITION.TYPE (.FEATURE) T 15, "EN.POSITION.X.LOC (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ,EN.POSITION.Y.LOC (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ,EN.POSITION.COMPLETION.FACTOR (.FEATURE) D(8,3), ,EN.POSITION.REQUESTING.UNIT (.FEATURE) T 15, ,,

.TASK I 2,

TRAIL FEATURE TABLE - TF./NG

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,EN.UM.NUMBER (.MISSION) I 12,EN.TRAIL.TYPE (.FEATURE) T 20,EN.TRAIL.X.GRID (.FEATURE) I 5, ',EN.TRAIL.Y.GRID (.FEATURE) I 5, ",EN.TRAII .EFFECT (.FEATURE) D(9,3), ",

.TASK I 2, /

ROAD FEATURE TABLE - RF. ING

EN.DATA.BASE. PREFIX T 5, ,EN.UM.NUMBER (.MISSION) I 12,EN.ROAD.TYPE (.FEATURE) 1 2, ,

.TASK I 2, /

OBSTACLE COMPLEX FEATURE TABLE - CF. *NG

EN.DATA.BASE.PREFIX T 5, ,',EN.UM.NUMBER (.MISSION) I 12, ", ,

EN.COMPLEX.TYPE (.FEATURE) T 14, ,',EN.COMPLEX.FRONTAGE (.FEATURE) D(9,3), s,",

E.COMPLEX.DEPTH (.FEATURE) D(9,3), ,

72

Page 72: Carol Subick - DTICLoginCarol Subick IC The Engineer Model Improvement Program r 'D0 6 9 (EMIP) was established in 1988 as a comprehen- DECO 6 1993 sive effort to ensure that engineers

DISTRIBUTION

Chief of Engineers: Army War College 17013ATTN: CEHEC-IM-LH (2) ATTN: LibraryATTN: CEHEC-IM-LP (2)ATTN: CERD-L US Government Printing Office 22304ATTN: DAEN-ZCM Receiving/Depository (2)

CEWES Vicksburg, MS 39180 Defense Logistics Studies Information ExchangeATI'N: CEWES-GV-A 23801-6043ATI'N: CEWES-EN-A ATTN: AMXMC-DATTN: CEWES-GM-LATTN: Library Defense Technical Info Center 22304

ATTN: DDA (2)CECRL 03755

ATTN: Library 328/93

CETECATTN: CETEC-GL-A

US Army SchoolsATT'N: ATSE-CDC-MATTN: ATSE-TD

US Army, Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060ATTN: Engineer Strategic Studies Center LibraryATIN: CEESC-MDATIN: Engineer Library

TRADOC Analysis CommandAIIN: ATRC-FMATITN: .ATRC-WEA

US Army Model Improvement and StudyManagement Agency (MISMA) 20324

ATTN: ODUSA-OR

USAMSAA Aberdeen Proving Grounds 21005-5071ATTN: AMXSY-CC

NCEL 93043ATTN: Library

US Military Academy 10996ATTN: Dept of Military Science

US Army Command & General Staff College 66027ATITN: ATZL-SWH

US Army Armor School 40121ATTN: ATSB-DOTD-CBT

US Army Combined Arms Center 66027-5300ATTN: ATZL-CAC

r U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1993-3510-S/80058