Carlsmith Ball LLP Confidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah Bjes October 22 nd, 2015.
-
Upload
britton-floyd -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Carlsmith Ball LLP Confidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah Bjes October 22 nd, 2015.
Carlsmith Ball LLPConfidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah BjesOctober 22nd, 2015
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 2
Now what?
Potential issue with outside counsel?
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 3
May or may not be privileged from client
Internal firm communications
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 4
Ethical duties to client trump attorney-client privilege
vs.
No ethical exception to attorney-client privilege
Courts split on nature of internal communications
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 5
State v. federal courtRole of consulting attorneyStatutes governing privilege
Considerations
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 6
Model Rule 1.4: Communications
(a) A lawyer shall:…
(3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter.…
(b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.
The duty to disclose
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 7
•Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements…
•Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client …or from the lawyer's own interests.
Comment: ABA Model Rule 1.7
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 8
"Lid“ on intra-firm communications "lifted."
Thelen, Reid & Priest LLP V. Marland2007 WL 578989 (N.D. Cal. February 21, 2007)
No privilege
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 9
Privilege must give way to …current clients who may be harmed by the conflict. When a law firm represents itself, it runs the risk of creating an impermissible conflict of interest.
In re SonicBlue, Inc.2008 WL 170562 (N.D.Cal. May 19, 2010).
No privilege
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 10
Privilege exists, but law firm must factually establish attorney-client relationship.
Court noted:
-Consultations are not always adverse to client.
-Firms often employ ethics & claims attorneys.
-Privilege does not excuse duty to report claim.
Palmer v. Superior Court 231 Cal. App.4th 1214 (2014).
California's statutory privilege
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 11
The attorney-client privilege guarantees the confidentiality necessary to ensure that partners, associates and employees provide information needed for sound legal advice.RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Burns & Levinson, LLP465 Mass. 702, 991 N.E.2d 1066 (2013)
Upholds privilege
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 12
Withdraw as counsel Obtain consent of client Disclose conflict to client
RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Burns & Levinson, LLP
RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Burns & Levinson, LLP
Client argued, for privilege to apply, lawyer seeking advise had to first:
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 13
•Withdraw from representation unnecessarily
•Withdraw without protecting client's interest
• Not obtain advice on potential conflict
• Sugar-coat facts
• Incur extra expense to retain outside counsel
RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Burns & Levinson, LLP
Court disagrees:Without the privilege, law firm may:
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 14
“dysfunctional” both to the client and the law firm.
RFF Family Partnership LP v. Burns & Levinson, LLP
Court characterized client’s assertions as…
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 15
Did lawyer consult with general counsel?
Did consulting attorney work on the file?
Have you been billed for the consult?
Has firm maintained confidentiality?
CommunicationsAre they privileged?
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 16
Will this create tension with a firm that generally supports your business?
Is the firm’s work generally excellent?
Will a request create conflicts?
Are you curtailing a plan to assist?
Internal CommunicationsDo you really require them?
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 17
• ©2015 Swiss Re Corporate Solutions. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivatives of this presentation or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re Corporate Solutions.
• Although all the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re Corporate Solutions does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re Corporate Solutions or its Group companies be liable for any financial and/or consequential loss relating to this presentation.
Disclaimer
Carlsmith Ball LLP | October 22, 2015 | Deborah Bjes 18
Thank you!