Cardigan Campus Master Plan 2015

C a r d i g a n M o u n t a i n S c h o o lCanaan, New Hampshire

C a m p u s M a s t e r P l a n U p d a t e + A c a d e m i c M a s t e r P l a n

August 19, 2015

Executive Summary ............................................... Section 1

Master Planning Update + Process ....................... Section 2

Academic Master Planning Process ....................... Section 3

Final Academic Master Plan Concept ..................... Section 4

Appendix ................................................................Section 5

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s

1.1C a r d i g a n M o u n t a i n S c h o o l

omr architects

1. Executive Summary

In 2014, Cardigan Mountain School in Canaan, NH asked OMR Architects to provide an Update to the 2009 Master Plan prepared by OMR, and also to provide a specific focus on the academic portion of the Master Plan.

The independent boys boarding and day school, for grades six through nine, is located on a 73 acre piece of land called the Point, which is surrounded by the Canaan Street Lake. Cardigan Mountain School owns additional land around Canaan, NH. Since June 2014, OMR Architects has worked closely with Cardigan to prepare an Academic Master Plan and Master Plan Update which will improve the school’s physical and academic campus in a way that will enhance their educational and community mission.

The primary goals of this Master Plan Update process began with the original 2009 goals that had not yet been addressed:

• Integrate and provide growth opportunities in Academics, Residential, Athletics and Arts curricula

• Develop Campus Wayfinding system / Create a Sense of Welcome and Identity• Consider purchasing other properties• Connect with the Town• Improve and Expand Parking: Provide parking for faculty near apartments and for

visitors near function• Pedestrian style campus: Remove cars from campus center with traffic at

perimeter

And the Master Plan Update priorities developed from this were:

• To improve faculty and student residential life• To address the space and curriculum needs of Academics and the Arts• To support a Cardigan Leadership / Welcome Center with the possibility of guest

accommodations• To develop an integrated experience of wayfinding and circulation which includes

the front entry and campus loop

While the Master Plan Update provided clarity around the recent campus planning decisions and on new issues that had been developing around the campus since the last Master Plan, it helped to elucidate any problems and potential solutions around campus for all future development. It was also a jumping off point for providing the much needed focus on the Cardigan academics, in order to bring the school’s facilities up to 21st century standards in teaching and learning and to remain competitive and current. OMR worked together with Cardigan Mountain School through a series of on-site meetings and interviews with the administration and faculty to understand the needs, challenges, and aspirations of the school community. The design team also evaluated campus academic buildings in regards to their program and use, and

1.2 C a r d i g a n M o u n t a i n S c h o o l

omr architects

the surrounding site characteristics. Through these meetings, Cardigan was able to establish their Academic Priorities:

• Arts - Music, Fine Arts, Humann Theatre, Gates, and Woodworking• Learning Commons and PEAKS offices• Science Classrooms• Flexible Spaces

The following Academic Master Plan Goals shaped the academic master plan process and concept design.

Fundamentals and Principles• Plan for no increase in student population.• Team Teaching is the best and most natural scenario for the CMS middle school

boys.• Focus on the model of “Individual Learners.”• Maintain 12-16 students per classroom.• All Cardigan spaces should be created to support the mission and culture of the

school.• Visibility to all students, both in and out of class, is important to maintain proper

behavior.• While outdoor connections between classrooms are important, physical proximity

and intentional placement of all academic classrooms would be beneficial & valuable.

• New spaces should be planned sustainably and environmentally.

Project Ideals• Provide the right number, right size, flexible classroom spaces, with 5-10%

additional space for future academic changes.• Expand on cross-curricular opportunities and collaborative options within the team

teaching format.• Separate classroom and study hall space from residence halls and dining

commons.• Emphasize the Arts by placing it within the day to day academic path.• Provide for larger classrooms to allow for active learning and flexibility in 21st

century teaching styles.• Learning Commons/ Library should be: the community hub of the campus; a

fun, living laboratory for curious learners; accessible and inclusive for the entire CMS community; purposeful with multiple, distinct spaces for students, adults and families; and have space to support mindfulness.

Project Features• Provide for dedicated and flexible common spaces to accommodate classroom

breakout, individualized and independent learning and the development of authentic relationships.


omr architects

• Provide dedicated faculty meeting/ resource/planning/ work spaces and storage for teams and/or departments.

• Provide more multipurpose spaces for both large and small groupings.• Provide varied and flexible space and furniture for adaptable groupings.• Connect the music program to the theater program.• Provide for appropriate and controllable natural daylight, ventilation, clock

systems, and sound isolation in classrooms.• Bring the outdoors back into the academic program with purposeful outdoor

educational spaces.

The current locations of academic programs are spread throughout campus creating an inefficient separation of functions and does not highlight the Art and Technology rich signature programs at CMS. By creatively rethinking how to unite the academic programs in a central place on campus through renovations, additions and linkages, the proposed Academic Master Plan has provided a unified vision and a functional campus which could be achieved in a series of phased construction projects over the next decade.

This document presents the process that was followed and the design and recommendations that form the Master Plan Update and Academic Master Plan. The final result is an Academic Master Plan that creates a Plan and Vision for Cardigan Mountain School over the next 10 plus years. When complete, the Master Plan will result in a more connected, cohesive school which contains all of the elements of the Final Building Program in a manner that meets the school’s Goals and Values.

Recommendations

Campus Master Plan:• Create a campus entry sequence that provides clear wayfinding and illuminates

the features of Cardigan Mountain School.• Reduce campus entries to the Point and reduce on-site paving and parking

around buildings to reinforce a safe and pedestrian friendly campus.• Provide a clear campus loop road which allows vehicles only at the perimeter of

the campus.• Three possible locations for a Cardigan Leadership/ Welcome Center were

discussed.• Discuss with the Town, the possibility of reducing or slowing down traffic on Back

Bay Road in order to make the area safer for the students.

Academic Master Plan:• Create a new Library/ Learning Commons with an interior connection between

Hopkins-Bronfman and Stoddard and a sustainable, green roof.


omr architects

• Locate all Team Teaching spaces in a renovated Hopkins-Bronfman. • Locate all remaining Academics and all Arts facilities in Stoddard with an addition

which brings in natural daylight to the inner core, provides full accessibility and delivers a building which has a welcoming facade.

• Maintain Marrion and Commons for flexible, shared space only. • Maintain day-to-day Administrative Operations and Academic Administration in

Hopkins-Bronfman, and consider moving the Business office to Chapel basement and Alumni and Development to the current Gates building.

• Remove all academics from Brewster, and reserve lower level of Brewster for future expansion of residential life.

• Create an Academic Green with effective, outdoor educational spaces and exterior access down to Cardigan Commons.

The three-phased construction project for the Academic portion of campus can be built in the range of 8-10 years. Based on conceptual construction and project budgeting in 2015 dollars: Phase 1, with a construction duration of 18 months, would be approximately $3,500.000; Phase 2, with a construction duration of 39 months, would be approximately $17,500,000; And Phase 3, with a construction duration of 6 months or two summers, would be approximately $1,600,000.

The first phase of construction would be the new Cardigan Learning Commons as shown below.

View of the New Learning Commons and Outdoor Reading Garden


omr architects

OMR Architects would like to acknowledge those who contributed to this Master Plan.

Members of the Master Plan Update and Academic Master Planning Committees:

David McCusker Head of SchoolJarrod Caprow Assistant Director of Studies & PEAKS Department ChairDevin Clifford Director of Summer ProgramsJames Fenn Director of Business OperationsRyan Frost Director of AthleticsAusten Hannis Assistant Athletic Director and Director of Student ActivitiesEthan Harris Assistant Director of Student LifeDavid Irwin Director of Student LifeTim Jennings Director of FacilitiesJoy Michelson Director of Advancement CommunicationsTimothy Newbold Director of Studies and Math Department ChairDavid Perfield Assistant Head of School for External RelationsMatthew Rinkin Assistant Head of School and Dean of Faculty

Additional participants in User Group Meetings:

David AuerbachJohn BurrittOwen Carpino Doug Clark Andrew CookHilary Coonan Joe Doherty Haver Flaherty Nate Furlong Shannon GahaganGraham Gauthier Jeff Good John Gordon Alex Gray Ann Hamel Wim Hart

Mandy IrwinKyla JoslinAlex King Corey LawsonRich MacDonaldKathleen NaroskiAmy Newbold Dan Perricone Elizabeth Perryman Pablo Rocha-Vazquez Avery Scoville Jeremiah Shipman Ryan SinclairKaitlyn Smarse Patrick TurcotteSarah Young

And special thanks to ORW Landscape Architects and Planners who contributed to the discussions and ideas around the Campus Master Plan entry sequence, entry drives, and creating a pedestrian-friendly campus.


omr architects

2. Master Planning Update + Process

Summary

OMR was asked to update the Campus Master Plan, originally completed in 2009, including all building projects that have been constructed since or planned for the immediate future. During this process, the goals and values for the School and for the Master Plan were revisited and priorities for this Plan were re-established.

There was a focus on identifying the areas needing improvement that had developed since the previous planning process, in order to realign the School’s future construction projects with the School’s Vision moving forward. The needs that surfaced included:

• Developing a campus wayfinding system• Making the arrival distinctive and impressive• Identifying spaces for re-purposing• Identifying future construction projects• Understanding the strategic advantage of the land that Cardigan cohabits• Understanding whose lens the campus should be seen from, i.e. the future or

current students, parents, faculty

This updated master plan includes improvements made on the campus since the previous master plan such as Cardigan Commons and Hayward Renovation and future projects including the new dorm, Clark Morgan Renovation and the Academic Master Plan. The Work Plan below shows the process established.


omr architects

Cardigan Mountain School Master Plan Update | 8.21.2014 3

2009 CMS Master Plan Goals: Updated

• Community first

• Support the faculty: Improve the Quality and Quantity of Faculty Residences / Provide parity for living conditions / Provide privacy, sound isolation & appropriate family spaces/ Provide a faculty social space, day care, dog park and playground

• Provide for Faculty Summer Living accommodations

• Move all Students to Residences on The Point

Curriculum & Program Facilities

• Provide Place for Music and Gates Programs

• Move Woodshop to an On Campus location

• Relocate and improve Maintenance Facilities

• Upgrade Computer Labs and Integrate Technology throughout campus

• Appropriate Teaching Tools & Acoustics in classes

• Create dedicated Student Center /Unstructured time

• Expand school’s Dining and Kitchen capacity to serve 400

• Improve and Expand Weight, Wrestling, Lockers, Gymnasium and other athletic spaces

• Provide Ski Team Space

• Expand Boathouse, Improve Waterfront/ Improve Wilderness Program / Integrate Outdoors into Core

• Consider purchasing other properties

• Connect with the Town

• Improve and Expand Parking: Provide parking for faculty near apartments and for visitors near function

• Pedestrian style campus: Remove cars from campus center with traffic at perimeter

• Design for Sustainable Features

• Create a Defined Use in all Cardigan Facilities / Cluster classrooms in fewer buildings / Dedicated classrooms

• Integrate and provide Growth Opportunities in Academics, Residential, Athletics and Arts curricula

• Develop Campus Wayfinding system / Create a Sense of Welcome and Identity

• Ensure Faculty/ Student ratio of 1:7 per residence

• Expand Student Residential capacity to 200 students (196 in 2014)

• Upgrade Electrical and Technology in student rooms

• Dedicated Common Rooms on every floor

• Upgrade Student Bathrooms and Bedrooms

Campus & CommunityResidential Facilities

In Progress Continuing FocusCompleted

Goals and Values

With the CMS Administrative Team, OMR reviewed and updated the Goals and Values from the original 2009 master plan. The original Goals were then categorized as either completed, in progress or part of the continuing focus. The critical goals are circled in purple in the image below. This exercise provided insight as to what OMR should focus on in the master plan update.

The Values that were developed in 2009 still remain important today in updating the master plan and work on the Cardigan campus. Those values are:

• CMS Core values: compassion, honesty, respect, integrity, scholarship, fairness

• Educating the whole boy• Fully Residential community | flexible community of adults & children | warm,

friendly, comforting | feeling of home• Higher standard of living for faculty• Global leadership & citizenship• Integration of curriculum• Clear, consistent student schedule, structure & supervision• Full participation by all• The beauty of the physical surroundings• Environmental sustainability and stewardship• Service Learning


omr architects

Priorities

The priorities of the master plan update that were developed by the committee are:

• To improve faculty and student residential life• To address the space and curriculum needs of Academics and the Arts• To support a Cardigan Leadership / Welcome Center with the possibility of guest

accommodations• To develop an integrated experience of wayfinding and circulation which includes

the front entry and campus loop

Process

To understand the needs of the integrated experience of wayfinding and circulation on Cardigan’s campus, we stepped back into the eyes of the typical first time visitor to Cardigan School, to the point where they might realize they are entering a different place. We call this the journey, and that place of realization is at the center of historic Canaan, NH, where Canaan Street Lake opens up at the intersection of Roberts Road and Canaan Street. There is a sense of slowing down one’s pace at this point, taking in the historic, residential, town center setting as one moves towards the formal campus entry. This is the beginning of the journey and sets the mood for entry to the campus.


omr architects

Campus Entry Sequence

The experience of the outer Cardigan campus first appears at the intersection of Canaan Street and Prospect Hill Road. For a first time visitor, this intersection may be confusing as the existing sign lacks strength and direction, and the unidentified church with its simple landscape hides any view of the campus beyond. Providing a three-sided sign (Location 1 on plan below) set behind a new, low stone wall at the corner, will provide that sense of entry and exit to those driving in each direction of Canaan Street and Prospect Hill Road. The stone wall should be in the same vernacular as the one located on the opposite side of the street in order to reinforce the Cardigan brand and wayfinding at the school. The sign should not only identify that you are entering the Cardigan Campus but should also provide directional information for wayfinding for visitors. This same treatment should also be applied at the intersection of Prospect Hill Road and Back Bay Road (Location 2).

The connection between the Point and Cardigan fields should be strengthened to provide campus cohesion, but the connection to the Town might also be strengthened as it is common for students and faculty to walk to Town for various reasons. Currently, pedestrians walk in the street to access the fields and faculty housing on Prospect Hill Road. A new tree-lined walking path, located inside the existing stone wall, running from the upper campus on the Point, across the existing bridge by the Canaan Street Lake inlet, meandering past the athletic fields and to the Church, would provide a safe route for pedestrians on campus, as well as a connection to the town (Location 3). A future field could be located along this route. It is also suggested that the storage containers and maintenance supplies around the Red Barn be removed and a landscaped, community space along the Lake be constructed, as this area (Location 4) frames the first view of the formal Cardigan campus. Providing space-defining, low fences around the parking and private grounds at Pearson and Fifield Houses, will provide a sense of place for these families.


JUNE 21AM

MAR 21 PM

N

Master Plan: Campus Entry Sequence

Soccer

Football

Football

Residential Community

COREBase Camp

Fields

FutureField

Community Gardens

Residential Green Tennis

FutureDorm

Baseball

Baseball

Possible Biomass

road

drive

sidewalk

wood fence

stone wall

tree

3 sided sign

view

landscaped place

cougar locations

Residential

Academic / Arts

Administration

Athletic

Student Support

Maintenance

1

3

42


omr architects

Main Campus Entry Drive

Multiple options were considered for redirecting the entry drive onto campus. Below are the four options that were presented.

• Option A - LoopCreates a circular drop-off area with parking. The focus of the entry view is Clark-Morgan Hall. Maintains the green space where the boys play. Preferable to have vehicles exit at the entry point, allowing for a clear separation of vehicular and pedestrian circulation through campus

• Option B - Paved PlazaCreates a drive that ends in a parking plaza. Vehicles exit at entry point. The focus of the view is to the athletic fields and the proposed dormitory. The green space is increased with a clear separation of vehicular and pedestrian circulation through campus.


Master Plan: Entry Option A – Current Plan

Football

Football


Maintenance

CORE Base Camp

Faculty Beach

Community Gardens

Tennis

Tennis

Event Parking

Baseball

Boating Instruction

N

Baseball

Soccer

Rope Tow

Residential Green

Possible Biomass

JUNE 21 AM

MAR 21 PM * Considerations:

1. Reduce entry points & paved roads 2. Road discussions with town

Future Field

*2

*1

road

drive

sidewalk

wood fence

stone wall

tree

3 sided sign

view

landscaped place

cougar location

Residential

Academic / Arts

Administration

Athletic

Student Support

Maintenance

Dining Commons

Future Dorm

Marrion Wakely

Gates

Chapel

Hopkins- Bronfman

Stoddard

Learning Commons

Brewster


Master Plan: Entry Option B – Paved Plaza

Football

Football


Maintenance

CORE Base Camp

Faculty Beach

Community Gardens

Tennis

Tennis

Event Parking

Baseball

Boating Instruction

N

Baseball

Soccer

Rope Tow

Possible Biomass

JUNE 21 AM

MAR 21 PM * Considerations:


Future Field

*2

*1

road

drive

sidewalk

wood fence

stone wall

tree

3 sided sign

view

landscaped place

cougar locations

Residential

Academic / Arts

Administration

Athletic

Student Support

Maintenance

Dining Commons

Future Dorm

Marrion Wakely

Gates

Chapel

Hopkins- Bronfman

Stoddard

Learning Commons

Brewster

Residential Green


omr architects

• Option C - Reverse Loop The location of the entry to the campus is moved to a point just over the crest of the hill on Back Bay Road which creates an entry experience with a view of Cardigan Mountain. Vehicles exit at entry point. The green space at the entry has been decreased, however the gathering space in front of the chapel has been increased, allowing for a better chapel entry experience. The vehicular and pedestrian traffic are clearly separated.

• Option D - One Way LoopCreates a one way drive with parking on one side. Additional parking is across Back Bay Road. The view is of the chapel and Cardigan Mountain. A large green space has been created between French, Brewster and Clark Morgan Halls. The separation of vehicular and pedestrian circulation has been maximized.

The committee decided to proceed with Option A. This work will be constructed with the Clark-Morgan Hall renovation which is ongoing at the time of this document.


Master Plan: Entry Option C – Reverse Loop

Football

Football


Maintenance

Rope Tow

CORE Base Camp

Faculty Beach

Community Gardens

Tennis

Tennis

Event Parking

Baseball

Baseball

Boating Instruction

N

JUNE 21 AM

MAR 21 PM

Soccer

Possible Biomass

Future Field * Considerations:


*2

*1

road

drive

sidewalk

wood fence

stone wall

tree

3 sided sign

view

landscaped place

cougar locations

Residential

Academic / Arts

Administration

Athletic

Student Support

Maintenance

Dining Commons

Future Dorm

Marrion Wakely

Gates

Chapel

Hopkins- Bronfman

Stoddard

Learning Commons

Brewster

Residential Green


Master Plan: Entry Option D – One Way Loop

Football

Football


Maintenance

Rope Tow

CORE Base Camp

Faculty Beach

Community Gardens

Tennis

Tennis

Event Parking

Baseball

Baseball

Boating Instruction

N

JUNE 21 AM

MAR 21 PM

Soccer

Possible Biomass

Future Field * Considerations:


*2

*1

road

drive

sidewalk

wood fence

stone wall

tree

3 sided sign

view

landscaped place

cougar locations

Residential

Academic / Arts

Administration

Athletic

Student Support

Maintenance

Dining Commons

Future Dorm

Marrion Wakely

Gates

Chapel

Hopkins- Bronfman

Stoddard

Learning Commons

Brewster

Residential Green


omr architects

Campus Entry Reduction + Parking Reduction = Pedestrian-Friendly Campus

OMR recommends reducing the number of entry points from Back Bay Road to the campus, in order to provide clarity to visitors and to provide safety by reducing the number of vehicular to pedestrian crossover interactions. With the proposed access road loop, vehicular circulation will be limited to the outer edges of campus creating a pedestrian-friendly environment. Both options exit at the current intersection of Back Bay Road and Crawford-Hinman Way.

• Option A provides for a new green space between French and Funnell, removes the major paving of Crawford-Hinman Way by creating a residential scaled interior loop for the dorms and the infirmary, and has a small redirection of the Faculty Row Road to Back Bay.

• Option B continues Crawford-Hinman Way with some reduction and clarification of existing pavement, but removes the major paving of Faculty Row Road by creating a residential scaled driveway to the lower access of Funnell and Dewar.

In addition, there are a number of areas on campus where the pavement seems to be excessive. OMR recommends reducing existing paving around buildings and providing only handicap accessible parking and limited visitor or short term parking near the buildings. A central parking area for all faculty, staff and administration could be


omr architectsCardigan Mountain School Master Plan Update | 8.21.2014 10

Canaan Street Lake

The Lodge

JUNE 21AM

MAR 21 PM

N

Cardigan Leadership Center Site Options

1

2

3

Considerations:

Option 1- The Lodge• School’s history• Distance from campus• Space for alumni,

development, meetings and guest rooms

• Site availability• Renovation cost

Option 2 – The Barn site• Site availability• Part of the core campus• Visual interest opportunity• Possible tear down, but

potential for footprint to be grandfathered

• Improve the waterfront

Option 3 – New site • Creates buffer to town• Linked to campus• Visual interest at campus

edge• Connection to new

sidewalk system• Site is customizable• Create guest village

overlooking athletics

located across Back Bay Road where the current event only parking is located. This would also reinforce the pedestrian- friendly environment of the campus.

Leadership Center

Locations for a new Leadership Center were studied. This center would be used for Alumni and Development offices and activities, have a few guest rooms and generally be used as hospitality and administration space.

• Option 1 - The Lodge- This location is the original CMS and part of the school’s history- It is a distance from campus, but events won’t disrupt the daily campus flow- There is ample space for alumni, development, meeting and guest rooms- The site is currently available- Renovation costs would need to be studied

• Option 2 - The Barn site- The site is available due to the relocation of Maintenance- As part of the core campus, the site has flexibility for daily campus use- Opportunity to provide visual interest at the main visitor view - Though barn structure may not be able to be reused, the footprint might be

grandfathered and should be reviewed with Town authorities prior to any removal of the building.

- Would improve the campus connection to the waterfront

• Option 3 - New Site- The site creates a visual buffer between the campus and town- Creates visual interest at the edge of campus- Connects to the new sidewalk system that is proposed in the master plan- The site is able to be customized to your needs- Creates an alumni- style guest village overlooking the athletic fields


omr architects

Final Master Plan Update

Biomass

C a r d i g a n M o u n t a i n S c h o o l

omr architects

3.1

3. Academic Master Planning Process

The Academic Master Planning process began with the establishment of a Committee comprised of key members of the Cardigan administrative team and a Work Plan. The Work Plan included five steps which were completed over the course of four committee meetings, each having specific objectives.

Meeting 1: Goals and ValuesMeeting 2: Program, Site and Building Analysis Meeting 3: Academic Master Plan OptionsMeeting 4: Final Academic Master Plan

The directive of the team was to focus in the area of the current academic facilities, i.e. Stoddard, Hopkins- Bronfman, Brewster, Chapel, Gates, Commons and Marrion. The priorities of this planning process included:

• Arts: Music, Fine Arts, Humann Theatre, Gates, and Woodworking • Learning Commons and PEAKS offices• Science Classrooms• Flexible Spaces

Below is the Work Plan with the specific objectives of each Meeting.


omr architects

Developing the Goals and Values

In order to ensure that the Academic Master Plan would meet the various needs of Cardigan, a series of Goals and Values were developed with the Committee. To provide insight to the discussion, an initial list of relevant ideals were culled from Cardigan’s Strategic Plan Goals and Values.

The Strategic Plan values include:• The boys are at the center of all we do• The unique educational environment and the unique needs of our boys, distinguish

CMS from other schools

The Strategic Plan goals include:• Foster creativity, critical thinking skills, and collaboration through a range of unique

academic and social experiences• Develop and implement programs that actively incorporate CMS’s unique, natural

and historical environment• Provide functional, environmentally responsible facilities and the resources

appropriate to the delivery and support of the program and people• Ensure that all facilities are well-equipped to meet present and future educational

technology needs

The following Academic Master Plan Goals were developed through user meetings with the Academic Faculty and the Committee, and ultimately shaped the academic master plan process and concept design.

Fundamentals and Principles• Plan for no increase in student population.• Team Teaching is the best and most natural scenario for the CMS middle

school boys.• Focus on the model of “Individual Learners.”• Maintain 12-16 students per classroom.• All Cardigan spaces should be created to support the mission and culture

of the school.• Visibility to all students, both in and out of class, is important to maintain

proper behavior.• While outdoor connections between classrooms are important, physical

proximity and intentional placement of all academic classrooms would be beneficial & valuable.

• New spaces should be planned sustainably and environmentally.

Project Ideals• Provide the right number, right size, flexible classroom spaces, with 5-10%

additional space for future academic changes.


omr architects

• Expand on cross-curricular opportunities and collaborative options within the team teaching format.

• Separate classroom and study hall space from residence halls and dining commons.

• Emphasize the Arts by placing it within the day to day academic path.• Provide for larger classrooms to allow for active learning and flexibility in

21st century teaching styles.• Learning Commons/ Library should be: the community hub of the

campus; a fun, living laboratory for curious learners; accessible and inclusive for the entire CMS community; purposeful with multiple, distinct spaces for students, adults and families; and have space to support mindfulness.

Project Features• Provide for dedicated and flexible common spaces to accommodate

classroom breakout, individualized and independent learning and the development of authentic relationships.

• Provide dedicated faculty meeting/ resource/planning/ work spaces and storage for teams and/or departments.

• Provide more multipurpose spaces for both large and small groupings.• Provide varied and flexible space and furniture for adaptable groupings.• Connect the music program to the theater program.• Provide for appropriate and controllable natural daylight, ventilation, clock

systems, and sound isolation in classrooms.• Bring the outdoors back into the academic program with purposeful

outdoor educational spaces.

Developing the Academic Space Program

OMR held a series of User Group Meetings with faculty to determine what works well in the existing school, what needs improvement and the quantity and size needed for all academic teaching and non-teaching spaces. The information that was provided at these meetings was used to develop the Building Space Program.

A draft space program was presented to the committee which met all the faculty’s desired needs. The space program showed approximately 27,000 net square feet of additional academic space to meet the needs of 21st century team teaching and the auxiliary spaces used in conjunction with the spaces for learning. Net square feet includes the usable space of each room only. We apply a grossing factor of between 45% and 50% to account for mechanical space, restrooms, janitor closets, wall thickness, and horizontal and vertical circulation. This 27,000 NSF translated to about 40,000 GSF total, which included the space needed in addition to the existing 38,769 NSF of Cardigan’s academic space. Note that this total square footage assumes that all classrooms will be 600 SF.


omr architects

After discussion with the Committee and Director of Studies the program was tightened and reduced. It was agreed that many classrooms are of adequate size for their function and do not need to be replaced or expanded, if a suitable space can be found that meets the other goals of this exercise. In addition, the final program square footage is based on the final master plan option which includes reuse and re-purposing of building space first, and building new space only as necessary. Below are some of the additional spaces that have been requested in the final program.

• Mathematics -1 additional classroom and 1 new math lab• Science - 2 additional labs and 1 additional prep room• World Languages - 1 additional ESL classroom• PEAKS - larger tutoring spaces for 3-4 people• Miscellaneous Academic - 2 new flexible classrooms and 1 new multipurpose

room• Fine Arts - new digital arts studio and ceramics studio and support space• Music - new dedicated music classroom, large ensemble room, practice and

rehearsal studios and storage• Theater - expansion of stage wings and seating within the current auditorium• Woodworking - larger shop adjacent to the stage and dedicated wood storage• Gates - larger lab, a dedicated classroom and storage• Learning Commons/ Library - separate areas for silent study, active group work,

projects rooms and children/family space• Summer session book storage• There is a general need for group break-out spaces and 2 shared teacher

planning/ resource centers


omr architects

The final space program includes 17,000 new space or re-purposed gross space (approximately 25,000 new GSF) for the academic program as shown on the previous page. A full space program can be found in the Appendix.

As background for developing the space program, the team discussed the many spatial arrangements that are often used in a CMS general classroom. The diagrams below show a 600 SF classroom and allow for different furniture layouts, space for student activity and stand-up presentation, space at the white boards for students to participate in groups and space for a teacher’s desk.

General Classroom Arrangements (600 SF)

The following page shows three different configurations for science space. The first shows a combined science classroom/ lab layout, where one teacher maintains an individual classroom and lab space. The other diagram shows a shared lab scenario, where a teacher has his or her own dedicated classroom, which opens onto a shared lab space. Two versions of the shared lab are shown. And each of the three solutions shows shared prep space.

Sharing a laboratory saves construction costs relative to square footage, millwork, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, as well as operations and maintenance of these highly specialized spaces, and allows for healthy collaboration between teachers and classes.


omr architects

Combined Science Classroom/ Lab Arrangements (1000 SF)

Science Classroom/ Shared Lab Arrangements (500/800 SF)


omr architects

Analyzing the Existing Conditions

Over multiple visits to the Cardigan campus, OMR reviewed the existing building and site conditions as well as how the students and faculty use the current academic portion of the campus, in order to better understand how the school functions at both a facilities and a programmatic level.

Academic programs on campus are currently spread around seven buildings: Brewster, Cardigan Commons, Chapel, Gates I.D.E.A Shop/ Williams Wood Shop, Hopkins-Bronfman Hall, Marrion Athletic Center and Stoddard Center. These buildings, and the central academic green connecting them, is the area of focus for this portion of the masterplan.

General Site Observations

Site observations, as shown on the next three pages, comprise environmental, physical and instinctual characteristics of the site, as they relate to the academic focus of this plan.

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan | 30 January 201526

Commons

Maintenance

COREBase Camp

Faculty Beach

Community Gardens

Event Parking

FutureDorm

Wakely

Gates

Hopkins-Bronfman

Boating Instruction

N

StoddardChapel

Brewster

GreenwoodBanks

Franklin

DewarFunnell

French Hinman

Fifield

Barn

Pearson

Prospect

Newton

Proctor

Frieze

Hayward

Clark Morgan

Stowell

Clancy

Waterworks

Area of Focus

JUNE 21AM

MAR 21 PM

Area of Academic Focus

Marrion

Area of Academic Focus


omr architects

Environmental Site Analysis

1. Solar Arc & Prevailing Winds2. Wetlands setback - 50’ waterfront buffer (no build area)3. Wetlands setback - 250’ protected shore land 4. Wetlands setback - 100’ wetlands buffer5. Steep slopes

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan | 30 January 2015 30

Commons

Gates

Hopkins- Bronfman

Stoddard

Chapel

Brewster

Marrion

N

JUNE 21 AM

MAR 21 PM

Site Analysis - Environmental • Solar Arc & Prevailing

Winds

• Wetlands Setbacks • 50’ Waterfront Buffer • 250’ Protected Shoreland • 100’ Wetlands Buffer

• Topography / Slope

Cold Winter Winds

Warm Summer Breezes

1

2

34

5

5

5


omr architects

Physical Site Analysis

1. Building Yards2. Vehicular Circulation3. Parking4. Building Entrances5. Pedestrian Circulation


Commons

Gates

Hopkins-Bronfman

Stoddard

Chapel

Brewster

Marrion

N

Site Analysis – Physical

• Vehicular Circulation & Parking

• Pedestrian Circulation

• Building Yards

• Building Entrances

1

2

34

5

5

5

1

1

2

33

3


omr architects


Commons

Gates

Hopkins-Bronfman

Stoddard

Chapel

Brewster

Marrion

N

Site Analysis – Instinctual

• Views

• Connections vs. Barriers

?

Instinctual Site Analysis

1. View from the chapel to Cardigan Mountain 2. View from the academic green to Cardigan Mountain and Canaan Lake3. The Chapel and Brewster feel as though there is a physical barrier to the academic

green4. A site wall between Stoddard and Hopkins- Bronfman create a barrier between the

Commons and the academic green, and disconnecting the circulation through the academic campus

5. The Trombe wall at Stoddard sets a physical barrier to the views6. There is a sense of discontinuity at the academic green opening between Chapel

and Stoddard7. Connections between Stoddard and Hopkins-Bronfman could be improved and a

sense of place be created in the landscape

1

2

3 4

3

5

6

7


omr architects

General Building Observations

Observations about the workings of the current academic buildings were analyzed in order to better understand what portions of the existing spaces should be maintained as-is or re-purposed for another use. The following nine pages of graphics represent those observations. This information was used in preparing master plan options.

Stoddard Main Level

1. Limited accessibility2. Corridors lack energy3. Levels hard to monitor4. Academics in corridor, fire code issues5. Poor room ventilation6. Distraction between PEAKS & Library7. Seating insufficient8. Limited views to the outdoors9. Classroom in support space

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan | 08 December 201437

Observations – Stoddard Main Level

• Limited accessibility

Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English

History / Social Sciences

Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic

Fine & Performing Arts

Learning Commons / Library

• Levels hard to monitor

• Academics in corridor, fire code issues

• Poor room ventilation

• Distraction between PEAKS & Library

• Seating insufficient

• Limited Views

*

*

• Corridor lacks energy

• Classroom in support area




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*



1

2

3

4

5

67

8

9

8


omr architects

Stoddard Lower Level

1. Circulation confusing2. Limited accessibility3. Room layout poor proportion4. No exterior windows5. Lack of access to restrooms6. Scale of exit


Library

WL

WL

WL

WLO

OD

D

Observations – Stoddard Lower Level

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Circulation confusing


• Poor proportion

• No exterior windows

• Lack of access to restrooms

• Scale of exist questionable?

1

2

3

56

4




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects

Hopkins-Bronfman Upper Level

1. Corridors and Stairs oversized2. 6th Grade classroom disconnected; better use of space?3. Art and Gallery not visible to all campus4. Need separate spaces for wet and dry arts5. Kiln space not adequate6. Math classroom disconnected; better location?


Observations – Hopkins Bronfman Upper Level

Gallery

O

6th Grade

Math

Art

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Corridors & Stairs over sized

• 6th Grade disconnected; better use?

• Art & Gallery not visible

• Need separate spaces for wet / dry arts

• Kiln space not adequate

• Math disconnected; better location?

1

2

34

56




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*



3


omr architects


Observations – Hopkins Bronfman Main Level

ScienceLab

ScienceLab

ScienceLab

Prep Prep

O

History

History

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Preferred size classroom

• Science labs over scheduled

• Corridors over sized

• Administration integrated with academics

• Corridor positive energy

Hopkins-Bronfman Main Level

1. Preferred classroom size for 21st century teaching2. Science Labs are over scheduled3. Positive integration between Academics and

Administration.4. Corridors are over-sized for the need5. Corridor has positive energy with fish tanks, science

experiments and administrative offices

1

2

3

5

4




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects


Observations – Hopkins Bronfman Lower Level

H/SS

H/SSO

Eng

EngMath

Math

WL

EPIC

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Circulation confusing

• Limited views

• No exterior windows

• Highlight special programs

Hopkins-Bronfman Lower Level

1. Vertical circulation confusing2. Limited views from some rooms3. No exterior windows4. Special programs should be more visible on campus

1

2

3 4




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects


Observations – Brewster Lower Level

Math

Math

MathEnglish


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Math adjacent to support spaces

• Limited views

• Columns in rooms

**

• Fishbowl

Brewster Lower Level

1. Math classroom adjacent to student support and loud mechanical spaces

2. Limited views from classrooms3. Columns in classrooms, limit flexibility4. “Fish bowl” classroom; distractions in corridor

12

34




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects


Observations – Gates

Gates/Woodworking

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Secluded from campus

• Not connected with arts

• Needs better proportions for safety clearances

Gates Main Level

1. Secluded from academic center of campus - Special programs should be more visible on campus

2. Not connected with the Arts3. Spaces need better proportion for proper circulation and

safety clearances

1

2

3




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects


Observations – Commons Lower Level

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Music needs specialized space; lacks support

Music

Commons Lower Level

1. Music needs a specialized space; lacks proper support space. Klein Theater is no longer a multipurpose space as planned and as faculty would like to have.

1




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects


Observations – Marrion / Commons Main Level

PEAKS

History

EngO

GCI/Leadership

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic



• Away from academic center

• Poor acoustics

• Great multipurpose space; over scheduled

Marrion & Commons Main Levels

1. Classrooms too far away from the academic “center”2. Poor acoustics between classrooms3. Great multipurpose space, but over-scheduled

1

2

3




Library

PEAKS

PEAKS

PEAKS

WL

HumannTheater

Stage Platform

English


Mathematics

Science

World Languages

PEAKS

Misc. Academic








• Limited Views

*

*




omr architects

The Organizational Diagram

OMR presented two organizational diagrams to generate discussion regarding the preferred relationships and adjacencies between programmatic elements. The diagram below shows the final diagram with the Library/ Learning Commons as the hub of the school and the Arts are emphasized along the daily path of the students. The diagram reflects the team teaching approach that works best for Cardigan’s middle school boys, but also the need for each academic discipline to be connected. And shared spaces such as GCI, ESL and Spiritual Life need to be easy to access throughout the day by all of the teams.

Based on this diagram, multiple, conceptual Master Plan Options were developed and presented at the third meeting with the committee.


Organizational Diagram – Ideal Academic Relationships

VisArts

Music

TechArts

PerfArts

SpiritualLife

GCI Library / Learning

Commons

ESL

ESL

History PEAKSScience English9th GradeGreen

8th GradeWhite EnglishHistory SciencePEAKS

Languages

Spanish

French

Latin

Math Math1

Gmtry

Math2

Alg2

PreAlg

Precal

Alg1

6th Grade

6th

6th

8th Grade Green

History

PEAKS

Science

English

English

History

Science

PEAKS

7th Grade

9th Grade White

History

PEAKS

Science

English

History

Science

GCI

Organizational Diagram


omr architects

Conceptual Options

In designing a series of options for review by the Committee, we analyzed the information gathered to date, including goals and values, preferred space program, and the existing conditions of the site and the buildings. Academics are currently spread throughout six buildings, but there is a desire to relocate remote academic programs to a central place on campus.

Our preliminary master plan options showed academics in three buildings, including possibly Chapel and/or Brewster. It was immediately determined by the Committee that expanding academics in Chapel was not a favored decision. As to a Brewster solution, the academics were focused only on the lower level due to a number of reasons, including: the existing concrete masonry unit (CMU) structure is not conducive to cost effective, major, interior reconstruction; the floor plate of the upper floors with a central hallway is not wide enough for acceptable classroom proportions without removing the CMU interior walls; a new Learning Commons in Brewster was considered with a lower level terrace carved out of the academic green, but it would not allow for a centralized Learning Commons at the hub of the daily path of the students; and if the facility became all academic, there was a concern about taking Brewster off-line as a residential facility as there would be a need to build another dorm in its place, prior to any academic renovations, which seemed to be an inefficient decision given the amount of residential still to be built. By removing all academics from Brewster means that the residential component can be expanded within this building for a more optimal use of construction dollars.

After presenting the first round of three conceptual options and communicating the potential pros and cons, the direction of CMS was to move all academics into two buildings with the Learning Commons as a connecting element. These changes meet the goals of the acadmic planning work and most importantly the following goals:

• Physical proximity and intentional placement of all academic classrooms would be beneficial.

• Emphasize the Arts by placing it within the day to day academic path.• Learning Commons/ Library should be the community hub of the campus.

Each of the three conceptual options presented included site improvements to the academic green, a centralized area for academics on campus, and each considered possible additions, renovations, re-purposing and/or new connections to existing buildings.

On the following pages are the options that were presented to the committee as well as the features and pros and cons for each scheme.


omr architects

Academic Master Plan Option A

To understand the site and the options that follow, this site section has been used to understand the relationships of the floor levels. This section through Stoddard, Brewster and the Academic Green shows relative floor levels 0 through 4, applied to the existing site and as each level relates to the buildings around the green.

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan | 7 April 201513

Spatial Relationships - Existing Site Section

Level 4

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Level 0

Stoddard Hopkins – Bronfman(Chapel across from H-B)

Brewster

Site Relationships- Existing Site Section


omr architects

Academic Master Plan Option B

Academic Master Plan Option C


omr architects

Option Recommendation Summary

From these options, the Master Plan Committee recommended the following attributes to be developed by OMR for the final Academic Master Plan:

• Create a Library/ Learning Commons with an interior connection between Hopkins-Bronfman and Stoddard, similar to Option C.

• All Team Teaching spaces to be located in Hopkins-Bronfman, per Option C. All remaining Academics and all Arts facilities to be located in Stoddard. Marrion and Commons to house flexible, shared space only.

• Using new classroom space, provide a new façade for Stoddard at up to three sides, as in Option A.

• Continue to distribute Administrative offices throughout buildings. Maintain day-to-day Operations in Hopkins-Bronfman, but consider moving Business office to Chapel basement and Development to current Gates building.

• Remove all academics from Brewster, and reserve lower level of Brewster for future expansion of residential life.


Options Summary

≈ 21,400 SF New≈ 52,300 SF Reno

≈ 27,200 SF New≈ 52,300 SF Reno

≈ 18,700 SF New≈ 52,300 SF Reno

Option A Option B Option Co Academics in 3 buildingso Stoddard = Arts and Libraryo Library remains in same locationo Science remains in same location+ Transformation at Stoddard exterior+ Clear circulation at Stoddard- Phase 1 is multi-phased

o Academics in 4 buildingso Stoddard = STEAMo 6th grade in discrete area+ Transformation at Stoddard exterior+ Clear circulation at Stoddard+ Music connects to Spiritual+ Library is center of Academics+ Opportunity for 21st c. Science+ Phase 1 solves Music

o Academics in 4 buildingso Stoddard = Artso Science remains in same location- No change at Stoddard exterior- No clear circulation at Stoddard- Math separate from other academic+ Library connects to Academics from

interior+ Additions are in discrete locations+ Phase 1 solves Library

Academic Master Plan Options Summary


omr architects

4. Final Academic Master Plan Concept

After many months of analysis, design and conversation, the Committee requested that the Final Academic Master Plan Concept include the integration of Options A and C. The features of the final concept include:

• Hopkins- Bronfman- Renovation- Maintain existing and add two additional state-of-the-art Science Classroom/

Labs and a prep room- All team teaching classrooms for grades 6-9 on three floors- ESL classrooms- Break-out space for group work- Faculty Resource Center - HOS, academic administration, and select other administrative spaces- New ADA Restrooms

• Stoddard- Addition and Renovation- Gates Lab & Classroom- Woodshop & Wood storage- EPIC Center with outdoor terrace for active work- New Music Rooms, practice rooms and storage- New art studios, kiln and storage- New PEAKS suite- Renovated Humann Theater- New Math Classrooms and Math Lab- New World Language Classrooms- Faculty Resource Center- Dedicated space for GCI with active and quiet study areas- Breakout spaces- Multipurpose spaces- New ADA Restrooms- Fully handicap accessible facility- Outdoor educational space

• New Learning Commons Addition- New single story facility connecting Stoddard to Hopkins-Bronfman- Stacks, small and large group project rooms, silent study carrels, family reading

space, circulation desk- Breakout space- Exterior seating


omr architects

• Brewster- No academic functions- Retain space for future residential expansion

• Chapel- No academic functions- Use lower level for administrative functions

• Marrion- Reuse space for flexible or future classrooms

• Cardigan Commons- Retain Powers Room multi-purpose space for shared, flexible use- Retain Klein Theater for shared, flexible use

• Gates- No academic functions- Use for alumni and development offices- Create defined parking and welcoming entry porch

• Academic Green- Defined circulation paths- Handicap access ramp to Stoddard- Exterior access from upper green to lower areas and Cardigan Commons- Outdoor educational spaces including a space for a sundial, benches and a

green roof on the new Learning Commons

The following pages show the final concept in plan. Below is a section through the Academic Green showing the new, handicap accessible, main entrance to Stoddard.


Spatial Relationships – Academic Green Section

Stoddard Hopkins – Bronfman(Chapel across from H-B)

Brewster

NewExisting

Proposed Site Section at Academic Green


omr architects

Academic Master Plan: Level 0 Floor Plan


Academic Master Plan- Level 0

WL

B.O.

St

O

ET

TWL

WLWL

Stoddard• 4 New World Language

Classrooms • Open Breakout Space• Storage for Gates &

Woodshop

N


omr architects




M

M

M

MST

D

MP (GCI)

M

DT

MP

M

M

M Lab

RC

WLT

B.O.

B.O.

E

Stoddard• 7 New Math Classrooms &

Math Lab• 4 New World Language

Classrooms • Faculty Resource Center• Dedicated space for GCI

active and quiet study• Open and enclosed

Breakout & Multipurpose Spaces

• Outdoor Educational space

Commons• Multipurpose Space

*

*

N

WLWL

WL


omr architects




Gates

Epic

Theater

StageP

Wood Shop

Art

Learning Commons

TT

Art

B.O.

T

8

8

8

8

87

7

7

7 MP

Music

P

P

Art

MusicSt

KilnL St

Pt

CROpen

To Below

Hopkins Bronfman• 7th & 8th Grade Teams• New open Breakout space • New Bathrooms

Learning Commons• New Library, Project Rooms,

Group work & Silent Study areas

• Open Breakout space• Outdoor Educational space

Stoddard• Gates Lab & Wood Shop• New EPIC Center• New Music, practice rooms

& Storage• New Art Studios, Kiln &

Storage rooms• Renovated Theater• New PEAKS suite• Outdoor Educational space

Commons• Multipurpose Space

T

*

*

*

*

N

Peaks

B.O.


omr architects Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan | 7 April 201515

Academic Master Plan- Level 3 Hopkins Bronfman• 9th Grade Team• Existing Science Labs• New Faculty Room with

Bathroom• Head of School and other

Administrative team • Outdoor Educational spaces

9

99

9

9F

HOS

O

Sci

PSci

Sci

P

* **

*

N



omr architectsCardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan | 7 April 201516


6T

T

ESL

ESL

Sci

Sci

P

O

B.O.

Hopkins Bronfman• 2 New state of the art

Science Labs & Prep room• 2 New ESL Classrooms• Existing 6th Grade Team to

remain in Gillette Room• New defined Breakout Space

N



omr architects

Phasing the Work

The Phasing Plan developed by OMR strives to implement the Academic Master Plan in the most efficient, logical and cost effective way possible for the school. An important goal of the Phasing Plan is to minimize disruption to students and faculty, both in terms of the construction impact and efficient planning so that academic programs move as infrequently as possible -- the ultimate goal is to move a program just one time into its final location.

The following pages show a three phase plan with sub phases. Each phase needs to be complete before the next phase commences.

• Phase 1A: New Learning Commons• Phase 1B: Renovation of Humann Theater• Phase 1C: Temporarily relocate Music program

• Phase 2A: 3 Story North Addition on Stoddard• Phase 2B: 1 Story West Addition on Stoddard• Phase 2C: 3 Story East Addition and Renovation of remainder of Stoddard

• Phase 3A: New Science Labs and Renovate 3rd Level of Hopkins-Bronfman• Phase 3B: Renovate 1st & 2nd Levels of Hopkins Bronfman

The final result is an Academic Master Plan that creates a Plan and Vision for Cardigan over the next 10 plus years. When complete, the Master Plan will result in a more connected, cohesive school, containing all of the elements of the Final Building Program in a manner that meets the school’s Goals and Values.

Please refer to the following pages for the Final Academic Master Plan phasing scenario.


Spatial Relationships – Learning Commons Section

Academic Green

Learning Commons

Alumni Drive

Site Section at Proposed Learning Commons


omr architects


Phase 1

New ConstructionRenovation - HeavyRenovation - LightSite work

Learning Commons

Phase 1A15 months• New Learning Commons

connector

Phase 1A: New Learning Commons Connector

Estimated construction length: 15 Months

This first phase would develop a new Learning Commons that connects the lowest level of Hopkins with the main level of Stoddard. The new Learning Commons would be the central hub of academics on campus, creating new 21st century learning opportunities with active group areas, project rooms of various sizes, silent study areas, stacks and carrels, and places for games and a children’s area.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 1


Theater

Stage


connector

Phase 1B3 months (summer project)• Renovate Humann Theater, all

new seating, upgrade lighting, AV & electrical systems

N

Phase 1B: Humann Theater renovation

Estimated construction length: 3 Months (summer project)

The second part of Phase 1 is a complete renovation to the Humann Theater. The projection room would be removed to increase the seating capacity of the space. This also includes brand new seating and carpeting and upgraded lighting, audio/visual and electrical systems.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 1


connector

Phase 1B3 months (summer project)• Renovate Humann Theater, all

new seating, upgrade lighting, AV & electrical systems

Phase 1C3 months (summer project)• Move Music temporarily into

former Library space with minimal change


Music

N

Phase 1C: Temporarily Move Music


The final part of Phase 1 is to temporarily move the Music program into the former Library Space with minimal changes. This would free up the Klein Theater to become the multipurpose space, as originally intended.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 2


Art

Art

Music

Art

Music

Phase 2A18 months• New 3-story addition with Art,

Music and Classrooms

N

Phase 2A: Stoddard 3-Story Addition with Arts, Music and Classrooms


Phase 2 has been broken into three parts to allow Stoddard to remain in use while construction is on-going The first part of this phase builds a three story addition to the north of Stoddard. The addition will have new art studios, music and practice rooms, math and world language classrooms and a math lab. The plan also includes breakout spaces dispersed through the levels.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 2


EPIC



Phase 2B12 months• New 1-story addition along

academic green with EPIC & PEAKS spaces

N

PEAKS

Phase 2B: Stoddard 1-Story addition and renovated Academic Green


The second part of Phase 2 is a one story addition to the west of Stoddard and the renovation of the academic green. The addition would give Stoddard a new face to the green and to the visitors to campus from the main drive. This work would also set the stage for providing full handicap accessibility to the building. The addition will include a PEAKS suite and a new EPIC lab, with access to an active working terrace. This addition will complete the interior connection to the new Learning Commons and Hopkins-Bronfman.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 2



Phase 2B12 months• New 1-story addition along

academic green with EPIC & PEAKS spaces

Phase 2C14 months• 3-Story addition along Alumni Dr

with Wood shop and Classrooms• Renovate former Library for New

Gates Lab• Renovate classroom and

breakout spaces


Gates

Wood Shop

TT

Pt

CRSt

N

Phase 2C: Stoddard 3-Story Addition / Renovation


The final part of Phase 2 is the three story addition to the east of Stoddard and the renovation of the remaining interior spaces. The addition would include a new wood shop adjacent to the stage and additional world language classrooms and breakout spaces. The former Library would be renovated into the new GATES Lab. The completion of this phase would transform Stoddard into a building that both integrates the academics with Arts and brings the Arts into the daily pathway on campus.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 3


ESL

ESL

Sci

Sci

P

N

Phase 3A3 months (summer project)• Renovate 3rd floor of HB, new

Science Labs & ESL classrooms


Phase 3A: Hopkins-Bronfman New Science Labs and ESL Classrooms


The first part of Phase 3 is the renovation of the third floor of Bronfman. Once the art program moves to the new studio space in Stoddard, two new state of the art science labs and two ESL classrooms and a breakout space can be constructed on this floor. Minor renovations to the 6th grade Gillette room.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects


Phase 3

Phase 3A3 months (summer project)• Renovate 3rd floor of HB, new

Science Labs & ESL classrooms

Phase 3B3 months (summer project)• Renovate 1st & 2nd floors of HB,

Classrooms & Breakout spaces


CR

CR

B.OT T

N

Phase 3B: Hopkins- Bronfman Renovation


The final part of the phasing plan is the renovation of the first and second floors of Hopkins- Bronfman. This project can happen simultaneously to Phase 3A or in a following summer. The renovations would create additional classrooms, breakout space and a faculty resource center.


Phase 1


Learning Commons


connector


omr architects

A conceptual construction timeline was developed for budgeting purposes. The timeline includes all of the phases of construction as well as time to prepare the design through construction documents. Note that all dates are for planning purposes only, are conceptual in nature and are based on estimated dates of substantial completion using a GC and a design-bid- build delivery method.

Construction and Project Budgets

An order of magnitude, conceptual, cost estimate was prepared in order to have an understanding of the financial impact of the individual phases as well as the overall ballpark project costs. A number of assumptions were made at this early stage of design.

• Construction Budget Includes- Order of Magnitude Budgeting- Developed based on conceptual square footages- General Conditions & Requirements- Estimating contingency- Phase 1 bid date of Spring 2016 assumed- Escalation at 4% per year compounded to mid-points of construction phases- Non-union wages- Note: No consultants were involved in this master planning phase, therefore,

assumptions were made about structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection, technology, civil, and landscape work.


Possible Project Timeline

* Dates are for planning purposes only, are conceptual in nature, and are based on estimated dates of substantial completion using a GC and a design-bid-build delivery method.

* Design includes Schematic through Construction Documents

End date of schedule

(Aug-Year 9)

Conceptual Design and Construction Timeline for all Phases


omr architects

• Project Budget Includes- Recommended 1.25 - 1.35 multiplier- Owner’s Project Manager Fees- A/ E/ C Design Fees- Project & Construction contingencies- FF&E / Technology- Permitting & other Fees- Commissioning- Site Unknowns such as hazardous materials, soils, groundwater, ledge,

foundation underpinnings, etc.- Market Conditions

The cost estimate prepared by D.G. Jones International has been included in the Appendix for reference.


Phase 3A New Science Labs: $750,000

Phase 3BReno 1st & 2nd Floors: $74,000

Construction Period: 6 Months/ 2 Summers

Construction Budget: $1.2M

Phase 2A 3 Story North Addition: $7.1M

Phase 2B 1 Story West Addition: $1.6M

Phase 2C 3 Story East Add/Reno: $4.2M

Construction Period: 39 Months


Phase 1A New Learning Commons: $1.95M

Phase 1B Humann Renovation: $440,000

Phase 1C Move Music temporarily: NIC

Construction Period: 18 Months


Project Budget: $1.5M - 1.62M*Project Budget: $16.2M - 17.4M*

Order of Magnitude Construction BudgetPhase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Project Budget: $3M - 3.25M** With recommended 1.25 - 1.35 multiplier

Conceptual Order of Magnitude Construction Budget by Phase


omr architects

Cost Savings strategies were discussed. They include:

• Phase 1A: Change a percentage of the green roof material to metal roof on the new Learning Commons

• Phase 1B: Replace only the auditorium seating in Humann Theater• Phase 2A & 2B: Combine Phase 2A & 2B at Stoddard, thereby shortening the

construction time. There will be a larger construction footprint on campus for the duration of Phase 2, with the potential for more disruption of the academics during construction.

• Phase 2A: Omit Level 0 at Stoddard which includes four World Languages classrooms. These would remain in the lower level of Brewster. There would be no new lower level access point from Alumni Drive to Stoddard. Brewster would not have an expansion of Residential to the lower level.

• Phase 2C: Omit the addition at the east side of Stoddard & just renovate existing spaces. The wood storage space would not be built at Stoddard but would remain at Gates. Reuse existing Woodshop at existing Gates Building, which would thereby separate Woodshop from the new Gates Lab. Development and Alumni would remain at Chapel.

The costs for this reduced plan are shown below.


Project Budget: $1.5M - 1.62M*Project Budget: $10M - 10.8M*

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Project Budget: $2.5M - 2.7M** With recommended 1.25 - 1.35 multiplier

Cost Savings Strategies

Phase 2A/2B 3 Story North Addition: $5.6M1 Story West Addition: $1.6M• Combine Phase 2A & 2B • Omit Level 0 (4-WL remain in Brewster)

Phase 2C3 Story East Add/Reno: $765,000 • Omit addition at east & Renovate existing• Reuse existing Woodshop

Construction Budget: $8M

Phase 3A New Science Labs: $750,000

Phase 3B Reno 1st & 2nd Floors: $74,000


Phase 1A –New Learning Commons: $1.9M• Change percentage of green roof

material to metal

Phase 1B Humann Renovation: $75,000• Replace only auditorium seating


Conceptual Order of Magnitude Cost Savings Strategies

Drawing does not depict cost

reduction


omr architects

The Learning Commons Concept Renderings

The new Learning Commons Concept is depicted on the next two pages. Site Plan, Floor Plan and two renderings are shown.

Conceptual Learning Commons Site Plan

View of the New Learning Commons and Outdoor Reading Garden


omr architects

View Looking Through the New Learning Commons

Conceptual Learning Commons Floor Plan


omr architects

5. Appendix

• 2015 CMS Space Program- Final

• Academic Master Plan Conceptual Cost Estimates, dated 13 March 2015

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master PlanPage 1 of 8

printed 7/20/2015

Cardigan Mountain SchoolAcademic Master Plan Departmental Program Summary - Final

1.0 English 2,540 2,390 -150

2.0 History/Social Sciences 2,499 2,499 0

3.00 Mathematics 3,025 4,800 1,775 1 additional classroom, 1 math lab

4.0 Science 2,701 4,770 2,069 2 additional classroom/labs and 1 prep

5.0 World Languages 3,347 4,500 1,153 1 additional ESL classroom

6.0 PEAKS 3,311 3,532 221 Would like larger classrooms & tutoring spaces

7.0 Miscellaneous Academic 2,815 6,330 3,515 4 new flexible classrooms, new 70 person lecture hall, new multipurpose room & 2 Faculty resource rooms

8.0 Fine and Performing Arts 15,196 22,804 7,608 New digital media lab, ceramics studio, larger support space. New music classrooms, practice rooms & storage. Expanded theater. Larger woodworking & Gates lab, new Gates classroom

9.0 Learning Commons /Library / Media Center 3,335 4,400 1,065 Separate areas for silent study, group work (active), project rooms and children/family area. Additional stacks space for 11,000 volumes

TOTAL (NSF) 38,769 56,025 17,256 New net space or repurposed gross

TOTAL (GSF) @ 1.45 56,215 81,236 25,021 (Grossing Factor of .45%)

TOTAL (GSF) @ 1.50 58,154 84,038 25,884 (Grossing Factor of .50%)

Program Element CommentsExisting Net Square Feet

(NSF)Variance (NSF)

May 1, 2015

ProposedApril 7, 2015

(NSF)

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master PlanOMR Architects Page 2 of 8

printed 7/20/2015

Cardigan Mountain School Academic Master Plan Final Program01 May 2015

No. Name Variance* RemarksBuilding Name Teacher Room Area Qty. Sub- Area Qty. Sub- NSF

NSF Total NSF Total + or (-) *Varience is the difference between existing 2014 & proposed 2014 area

1.000 English

1.100 Instructional Spaces 1.110 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Gray, A 105 481 1 481 481 1 481 01.111 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Kenny, C 203 469 1 469 469 1 469 01.112 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Good, J 109 398 1 398 398 1 398 01.113 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Hart, W 208 402 1 402 402 1 402 01.114 Classroom Marrion Wennik, M 102 540 1 540 540 1 540 0 current rooms needs acoustic separation1.115 Classroom (new) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 2014

Sub-total 5 2,290 5 2,290 0

1.200 Support Spaces1.210 Department Planning / Resource Center/Storage Marrion 208/209 250 1 250 0 0 0 (250) 5 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty1.211 New Storage Summer Session 0 0 0 100 1 100 100

Sub-total 1 250 1 100 (150)

1.000 English 6 2,540 6 2,390 -150 Total Net Square Feet

2.000 History/Social Sciences

2.100 Instructional Spaces 2.110 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Cook, A 108 472 1 472 472 1 472 02.111 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Lawson, C 106 463 1 463 463 1 463 02.112 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Clark, D 205 616 1 616 616 1 616 02.113 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Gordon / Hannis 204 408 1 408 408 1 408 02.114 Classroom Marrion Nakade, M 101 540 1 540 540 1 540 0 current rooms needs acoustic separation2.115 Classroom (new) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 20142.116 Classroom (new) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 2014

Sub-total 5 2,499 5 2,499 0

2.200 Support Space2.210 Department Planning / Resource Center/Storage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty

Sub-total 0 0 0 0 0

2.000 History/Social Sciences 5 2,499 5 2,499 0 Total Net Square Feet

Existing 2014Current Building Master Plan 2015


printed 7/20/2015





3.000 Mathematics

3.100 Instructional Spaces3.110 Classroom Brewster MacDonald, R 101 366 1 366 600 1 600 2343.111 Classroom Brewster Joslin, K 102 430 1 430 600 1 600 1703.112 Classroom Brewster Ramos, E 103 442 1 442 600 1 600 1583.113 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Gauthier, G 101 475 1 475 600 1 600 1253.114 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Scoville/ Newbold 302 686 1 686 600 1 600 (86)3.115 Classroom Hop-Bronfman Kreuzburg, A 103 471 1 471 600 1 600 1293.116 Classroom (new) 0 0 0 600 1 600 6003.116 New Math Lab 0 0 0 600 1 600 600 size of classroom, locate next to resource center

Sub-total 6 2,870 8 4,800 1,930

3.200 Support Space3.210 Department Planning / Resource Center/Storage Hop-Bronfman 204 155 1 155 0 0 0 (155) 7 Faculty @ 85 SF/faculty

Sub-total 1 155 0 0 (155)

3.000 Mathematics 7 3,025 8 4,800 1,775 Total Net Square Feet

4.000 Science

4.100 Instructional Spaces4.110 Science Class/Lab- Physics Hop-Bronfman 218 673 1 673 673 1 673 04.111 Science Class/Lab - Biology Hop-Bronfman 220 656 1 656 656 1 656 04.112 Science Class/Lab - Chemistry Hop-Bronfman 222 777 1 777 777 1 777 04.113 New Science Class/Lab 0 0 0 915 1 915 9154.114 New Science Class/Lab 0 0 0 1,000 1 1,000 1,000

Sub-total 3 2,106 5 4,021 1,915

4.200 Support Spaces4.210 Department Planning / Resource Center/Storage Hop-Bronfman 213 155 1 155 155 1 155 0 6 faculty 4.211 Prep Room Hop-Bronfman 219 229 1 229 229 1 229 0 shared between 2 science labs4.212 Prep Room Hop-Bronfman 225 156 1 156 156 1 156 0 shared between 2 science labs4.213 Green House Hop-Bronfman 220A 55 1 55 55 1 55 04.214 New Prep Room 0 154 1 154 154 shared between 2 science labs4.215 Prep Room (new) 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 20144.216 Prep Room (new) 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 2014

Sub-total 4 595 5 749 154

4.000 Science 7 2,701 10 4,770 2,069 Total Net Square Feet


printed 7/20/2015





5.000 World Languages

5.100 Instructional Spaces5.110 Classroom Spanish Stoddard 101 560 1 560 600 1 600 405.111 Classroom Latin Stoddard 201 570 1 570 600 1 600 30 current room has no exterior windows5.112 Classroom Spanish Stoddard 103 547 1 547 600 1 600 535.113 Classroom Spanish Stoddard 302 544 1 544 600 1 600 565.114 Classroom French Stoddard 102 239 1 239 600 1 600 361 current room too long and narrow5.115 Classroom French Stoddard 305 266 1 266 600 1 600 3345.116 Classroom ESL Hop-Bronfman 110 482 1 482 450 1 450 (32)5.117 Classroom ESL (new) 0 0 0 450 1 450 4505.118 Classroom (new) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 2014

Sub-total 7 3,208 8 4,500 1,292

5.200 Support Spaces5.210 World Language Office Stoddard 119 63 1 63 0 0 0 (63) proposed in 2009 combined in 20145.211 World Language Office Stoddard 121 76 1 76 0 0 0 (76) proposed in 2009 combined in 20145.212 Department Planning / Resource Center/Storage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty

Sub-total 2 139 0 0 (139)

5.000 World Languages 9 3,347 8 4,500 1,153 Total Net Square Feet

6.000 PEAKS

6.100 Instructional Spaces6.110 Classroom Stoddard 310 645 1 645 645 1 645 06.111 Classroom Stoddard 301 558 1 558 585 1 585 276.112 Classroom Marrion 103 540 1 540 540 1 540 0 current rooms needs acoustic separation6.113 Computer Lab / Classroom Stoddard 213 262 1 262 262 1 262 06.114 Classroom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 20146.115 Classroom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proposed in 2009 not requested in 2014

Sub-total 4 2,005 4 2,032 27

6.200 Support Space6.210 Office Stoddard 222 88 1 88 0 0 0 (88)6.211 Tutoring (small) Stoddard 218 88 1 88 225 1 225 137 Need space for 2-3 student plus adult 6.212 Tutoring (small) Stoddard 219 83 1 83 225 1 225 142 Need space for 2-3 student plus adult 6.213 Tutoring (small) Stoddard 220 77 1 77 225 1 225 148 Need space for 2-3 student plus adult 6.214 Tutoring (small) Stoddard 217 88 1 88 225 1 225 137 Need space for 2-3 student plus adult 6.215 Group Tutoring Suite Stoddard 215 764 1 764 600 1 600 (164) Current space is in corridor6.216 Department Planning / Resource Center/Storage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Faculty @ 85 SF/faculty6.217 Reading Alcove Stoddard 221 118 1 118 0 0 0 (118) becomes part of tutoring suite

Sub-total 7 1,306 5 1,500 194

6.000 PEAKS 11 3,311 9 3,532 221 Total Net Square Feet


printed 7/20/2015





7.000 Miscellaneous Academic

7.100 Instructional Spaces 7.110 6th Grade Classroom Hop-Bronfman 511 Gillette 1,310 1 1,310 1,310 1 1,310 0 CR's should be adjacent, with connection. total 6th range 12-24 7.111 6th Grade Classroom 0 1 0 0 0 0 07.112 Spiritual Studies Classroom Stoddard Humaan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 use flex classroom or multipurpose room. Outdoor CR7.113 GCI Leadership Cardigan Commons Powers 1,076 1 1,076 0 0 0 (1,076) use flex classroom or multipurpose room 15-45 students7.114 GCI Leadership Stoddard Humman 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 use flex classroom or multipurpose room 15-45 students7.115 New Lecture Hall 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 for 70 people7.116 Klien Theater 0 0 0 1,402 1 1,402 1,4027.117 Gillette MultipurposeRoom Hop-Bronfman 511 0 0 0 1,310 0 - 0 Free up space for shared multipurpose use7.118 New Flexible Classrooms 0 0 0 400 2 800 800 10% of 32 Classrooms7.119 New Multipurpose Room 0 0 0 1,438 1 1,438 1,438

Sub-total 5 2,386 5 4,950 2,564

7.200 Support Space7.210 Department Planning / Resource Center/St Hop-Bronfman 504 153 1 153 450 2 900 747 one per building7.211 6th Grade Storage Hop-Bronfman 513 72 1 72 100 1 100 287.212 Spiritual Studies Office 0 1 0 170 1 170 170 2 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty7.213 IT Office Stoddard 227 204 1 204 170 1 170 (34) 2 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty7.214 Copier Center - Students 0 0 0 20 2 40 40 1 per building7.215 Faculty Mailroom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in resource center7.216 Copy Center - Faculty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in resource center

Sub-total 4 429 7 1,380 951

7.000 Miscellaneous Academic 9 2,815 12 6,330 3,515 Total Net Square Feet


printed 7/20/2015





8.000 Fine and Performing Arts

8.100 Visual Arts8.110 Multipurpose Arts Studio Hop-Bronfman 505 1,503 1 1,503 1,000 1 1,000 (503) Air conditioning does not work8.111 New Digital Media / Mac Lab 0 0 0 900 1 900 900 5-10 Students Max 10 Computer, graphic art, programming, robotics8.112 New Laser Cutter 0 0 0 150 1 150 150 Room off of Digital Media lab.8.113 New Ceramics Studio 0 0 0 1,000 1 1,000 1,0008.114 Drawing/Painting Studio 0 0 0 0 0 0 08.115 Printmaking Studio 0 0 0 0 0 0 08.116 Kiln Room Hop-Bronfman 505A 31 1 31 150 1 150 119 current room size not adequete 8.117 Storage Hop-Bronfman 5050 43 1 43 100 1 100 578.118 Storage Hop-Bronfman 5060 46 1 46 100 1 100 548.119 Storage Hop-Bronfman 5050 44 1 44 100 1 100 568.120 Gallery Hop-Bronfman 502 925 1 925 925 1 925 08.121 Dark Room Brewster 104 191 1 191 0 0 0 (191)

Sub-total 7 2,783 9 4,425 1,642

8.200 Music8.210 General Classroom Cardigan Commons Klien Theater 1,402 1 1,402 600 1 600 (802)8.211 New Large ensemble 0 0 0 1,000 1 1,000 1,0008.212 New Rehearsal Studio 0 0 0 300 1 300 3008.213 Large Practice Room 0 0 0 200 1 200 200 displace due to renovation of Hayward8.214 Small Practice Room 0 0 0 70 2 140 140 displace due to renovation of Hayward8.215 Small Practice Room 0 0 0 70 1 70 70 displace due to renovation of Hayward8.216 New Instrument Storage 0 0 0 200 1 200 2008.217 New Music Storage 0 0 0 100 1 100 1008.218 New Music Director's Office 0 0 0 170 1 170 170 2 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty

Sub-total 1 1,402 10 2,780 1,378

8.300 Woodworking8.310 Woodshop Gates 1,783 1 1,783 3,000 1 3,000 1,2178.311 Paint Finishing Gates 150 1 150 150 1 150 08.312 New Wood Material Storage 0 200 1 200 200

Sub-total 2 1,933 3 3,350 1,417

8.400 Gates8.401 Lab Gates 1,783 1 1,783 3,000 1 3,000 1,2178.402 New Classroom 0 0 0 600 1 600 6008.403 New Tool Storage 0 0 0 100 1 100 1008.404 New Storage 0 0 0 200 1 200 2008.405 New Office 0 0 0 170 1 170 170 2 faculty @ 85 SF/faculty8.406 Epic Center (clean technology) Hop-Bronfman Epic Center 616 1 616 1,000 1 1,000 384

Sub-total 2 2,399 6 5,070 2,671

8.500 Drama / Theater8.510 Lobby Stoddard 203 950 1 950 950 1 950 08.511 Inner Foyer Stoddard NA 390 1 390 390 1 390 08.512 Auditorium Stoddard 204 2,946 1 2,946 3,024 1 3,024 78 Adjust seating layout for additonal 50 seats8.513 Platform Stoddard 206 1,514 1 1,514 1,514 1 1,514 08.514 Kitchen Stoddard 234 48 1 48 48 1 48 08.515 Coat Room Stoddard 235 119 1 119 119 1 119 08.516 Projection Booth Stoddard 205 78 1 78 0 0 0 (78) remove to make room for additional seating8.517 Theater Storage Stoddard 106 344 1 344 344 1 344 08.518 Dressing Room Stoddard 105 145 1 145 145 1 145 0


printed 7/20/2015





8.519 Dressing Room Stoddard 104 145 1 145 145 1 145 08.520 New Wing Stage Right & Left 0 0 0 500 1 500 5008.521 New Fly Tower 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Additional volume above platform

Sub-total 10 6,679 11 7,179 500

8.000 Fine and Performing Arts 22 15,196 39 22,804 7,608 Total Net Square Feet


printed 7/20/2015





9.000 Learning Commons /Library / Media Center

9.100 Library/ Media Center9.110 Library Seating/ Stacks/Entry Stoddard 125/126/224 2,709 1 2,709 0 0 0 (2,709)9.111 Library Circulation Desk Stoddard 230 55 1 55 200 1 200 145 printing station for students9.112 New Stacks 0 0 0 1,000 1 1,000 1,000 max 11,000 volumes9.113 New Silent Study Area 0 0 0 500 1 500 5009.113 New Group Work Area (active) 0 0 0 1,000 1 1,000 1,0009.114 New Project Room Small 0 0 0 100 3 300 300 Individual or small group9.114 New Project Room Medium 0 0 0 300 1 300 3009.115 New Project Room Large 0 0 0 600 1 600 6009.115 New Game / Childrens area 0 0 0 100 1 100 100 for faculty families and children

Sub-total 2 2,764 10 4,000 1,236

9.200 Support Spaces9.210 Librarian's Office Stoddard 225 139 1 139 0 0 0 (139)9.211 Library Media Stoddard 226 96 1 96 0 0 0 (96)9.212 Library Storage Stoddard 100 62 1 62 0 0 0 (62)9.213 Library Work Stoddard 228 159 1 159 0 0 0 (159)9.214 Library Equipment Storage Stoddard 229 115 1 115 0 0 0 (115)9.215 New Workroom / Office 0 0 0 400 1 400 400

Sub-total 5 571 400 1 400 (171)

9.000 Learning Commons /Library / Media Center 7 3,335 11 4,400 1,065 Total Net Square Feet

Totals 83 38,769 108 56,025 17,256

Cardigan Mountain SchoolAcademic Master Plan

Canaan, NH

C t l C t E ti tConceptual Cost Estimates

Prepared for:omrarchitectsomrarchitects

West Acton, MA

Prepared by:D G Jones International, Inc.

3 Baldwin Green Common, #202Woburn, MA 01801Woburn, MA 01801

March 13, 2015

Cardigan Mountain School, Academic Master Plan, Canaan, NHConceptual Cost Estimates - Summary - With Escalation

March 13, 2015

SUMMARY - WITH ESCALATION

All Phases Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Gross Floor Area (sf) 58,185 8,300 43,150 6,735

Construction Period 15 months 39 months 6 months

Element ($) Element ($) Element ($) Element ($)

A Substructure 819,400 169,600 649,800 0

A10 Foundations 718,900 169,600 549,300 0

A20 Basement Construction 100,500 0 100,500 0

B Shell 2,619,775 503,500 2,116,275 0

B10 Superstructure 1,192,400 164,300 1,028,100 0

B20 Exterior Enclosure 911,600 180,200 731,400 0

B30 Roofing 515,775 159,000 356,775 0

C Interiors 2,174,765 280,100 1,644,600 250,065

C10 Interior Construction 982,380 97,500 769,500 115,380

C20 Stairs 53,785 6,000 41,500 6,285

C30 Interior Finishes 1,138,600 176,600 833,600 128,400

D Services 3,209,830 443,500 2,457,900 308,430

D10 Conveying Systems 90,450 0 90,450 0

D20 Plumbing 112,353 26,500 76,425 9,428

D30 HVAC 1,609,175 217,600 1,230,850 160,725

D40 Fire Protection Systems 272,773 37,800 212,075 22,898

D 50 Electrical Systems 1,125,080 161,600 848,100 115,380

E Equipment and Furnishings 461,575 139,100 289,700 32,775

E10 Equipment 80,285 25,600 47,950 6,735

E 20 Furnishings 381,290 113,500 241,750 26,040

F Special Construction and Demolition 219,005 12,000 155,825 51,180

F10 Covered Entry/Pergola 0 0 0 0

F20 Selective/Building Demolition 219,005 12,000 155,825 51,180

F20 Asbestos Abatement 0 0 0 0

Sub Total Building Cost 9,504,350 1,547,800 7,314,100 642,450

G Building Sitework 1,084,110 161,100 882,600 40,410

G10 Site Preparation 81,593 12,100 66,125 3,368

G20 Site Improvements 466,370 69,600 383,300 13,470

G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities 361,370 53,700 294,200 13,470

G40 Site Electrical Utilities 128,185 18,900 102,550 6,735

G90 Other Site Construction 46,593 6,800 36,425 3,368

Sub Total Construction 10,588,460 1,708,900 8,196,700 682,860

General Conditions/Requirements 1,270,615 205,068 983,604 81,943

Escalation to mid points of construction 2,427,458 156,180 1,989,372 281,906

Estimating Contingency 2,142,980 310,522 1,675,451 157,006

Permit Fee 82,148 11,903 64,226 6,019

Construction Contingency 0 Excluded Excluded Excluded

Total Construction Cost 16,511,661 2,392,573 12,909,353 1,209,735

cmcg\mydocs\projects\2015\2015-006 Cardigan Mountain School, AMP, Concepts, Mar 2015 Page 1 d g jones international inc

Cardigan Mountain School, Academic Master Plan, Canaan, NHConceptual Cost Estimates - Summary - No Escalation

March 13, 2015

SUMMARY - NO ESCALATION

All Phases Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Gross Floor Area (sf) 58,185 8,300 43,150 6,735

Construction Period 15 months 39 months 6 months

Element ($) Element ($) Element ($) Element ($)

A Substructure 819,400 169,600 649,800 0

A10 Foundations 718,900 169,600 549,300 0

A20 Basement Construction 100,500 0 100,500 0

B Shell 2,619,775 503,500 2,116,275 0

B10 Superstructure 1,192,400 164,300 1,028,100 0

B20 Exterior Enclosure 911,600 180,200 731,400 0

B30 Roofing 515,775 159,000 356,775 0

C Interiors 2,174,765 280,100 1,644,600 250,065

C10 Interior Construction 982,380 97,500 769,500 115,380

C20 Stairs 53,785 6,000 41,500 6,285

C30 Interior Finishes 1,138,600 176,600 833,600 128,400

D Services 3,209,830 443,500 2,457,900 308,430

D10 Conveying Systems 90,450 0 90,450 0

D20 Plumbing 112,353 26,500 76,425 9,428

D30 HVAC 1,609,175 217,600 1,230,850 160,725

D40 Fire Protection Systems 272,773 37,800 212,075 22,898

D 50 Electrical Systems 1,125,080 161,600 848,100 115,380

E Equipment and Furnishings 461,575 139,100 289,700 32,775

E10 Equipment 80,285 25,600 47,950 6,735

E 20 Furnishings 381,290 113,500 241,750 26,040

F Special Construction and Demolition 219,005 12,000 155,825 51,180

F10 Covered Entry/Pergola 0 0 0 0

F20 Selective/Building Demolition 219,005 12,000 155,825 51,180

F20 Asbestos Abatement 0 0 0 0

Sub Total Building Cost 9,504,350 1,547,800 7,314,100 642,450

G Building Sitework 1,084,110 161,100 882,600 40,410

G10 Site Preparation 81,593 12,100 66,125 3,368

G20 Site Improvements 466,370 69,600 383,300 13,470

G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities 361,370 53,700 294,200 13,470

G40 Site Electrical Utilities 128,185 18,900 102,550 6,735

G90 Other Site Construction 46,593 6,800 36,425 3,368

Sub Total Construction 10,588,460 1,708,900 8,196,700 682,860

General Conditions/Requirements 1,270,615 205,068 983,604 81,943

Escalation to mid points of construction Excluded Excluded Excluded Excluded

Estimating Contingency 2,142,980 310,522 1,675,451 157,006

Permit Fee 82,148 11,903 64,226 6,019

Construction Contingency 0 Excluded Excluded Excluded

Total Construction Cost 14,084,203 2,236,394 10,919,981 927,828


Cardigan Mountain School, Academic Master Plan, Canaan, NHConceptual Cost Estimates - Notes

March 13, 2015

Notes

1. Brief project description:-- Phased construction to add and renovate existing buildings on campus.

2 The estimate is based on the following:

cmcg\mydocs\projects\2015\2015-006 Cardigan Mountain School, AMP, Concepts, Mar 2015Page 3 d g jones international inc

2. The estimate is based on the following:-- Open shop wage rates.- GC type project.- Receipt of 4# bona fide bids from GCs.- Each Phase will be a separate contract.- Existing buildings will be occpied during construction.- Construction periods for all Phases are noted on Summary page.- Mid points of construction:-Mid points of construction:

- Phase 1 - 1Q2017 - Phase 2 - 1Q2020 - Phase 3 - 1Q2023.

3. The gross floor areas are based on the following:-- Measurement is taken to the outside face of the exterior wall, measured through all

stair wells, elevator shafts and ducts.

4. Story heights:-- Varies.

5. General Requirements/Conditions are priced as a percentage.

6. Special Conditions for this project are included with General Requirements.

7. Escalation to mid points of construction is compounded per annum at the following:-- All years at 4%- Note: Escalation is taken on the sum of Sub Total Construction cost, General

Requirements/Special Conditions.

8. Estimating Contingency is an allowance for future design modifications/additions, which alter thecost of the building as the design progresses, this percentage reduces as the design develops. It is based on a percentage of the sum of Sub-Total Construction, General Requirements/ Special Conditions and Escalation. For this level of estimate the following has been included:-

- 15.00%


Cardigan Mountain School, Academic Master Plan, Canaan, NHConceptual Cost Estimates - Notes

March 13, 2015

Notes (Cont'd)

9. Construction Contingency is an allowance for scope/design modifications made by the ownerduring construction and also for any unforeseen circumstances. It is based on a percentage of the sum of Sub-Total Construction, General Requirements/Special Conditions, Escalationand Design Contingency The following has been included:


and Design Contingency. The following has been included:-- By Owner

10. This estimate has been prepared from the following design information:-- Master Plan Block Floor Plans received on 03/05/2015.- Meeting with omr on 03/05/2015.- Various emails from omr.- Telecons with omr.Telecons with omr.

11. The estimate includes the following:-- Security (conduit & draw wire only)- Telephone/data wiring.- Shades to exterior windows.- Building permit fees.

12 Th ti t l d th f ll i12. The estimate excludes the following:-- Sales tax.- Utility company backcharges.- Design consultant's fees.- Hazardous material abatement and removal.- Excavation in rock.- Removal of water during excavation work.- Underpinning existing foundations.- Underpinning existing foundations.- Loose furniture, fittings and equipment.- Fixed furniture, fittings and equipment except work normally included in GC work.- Third-party building Commissioning.

13. Allowances:-- Estimate is based on allowances at this stage of the design.

14. Assumptions:-- To arrive at a $/sf cost reasonable assumptions have been made.- Balanced site work for cut & fill.

15. Estimates by other firms:-- None.


Cardigan Mountain School, Academic Master Plan, Canaan, NHConceptual Cost Estimates - Phase 1

March 13, 2015

Phase 1

Gross Floor Area (sf) = 8,300 5,300 3,000 0

Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf

A Substructure 169,600 20.43 169,600 32.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

A10 Foundations 169,600 20.43 169,600 32.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

A20 Basement Construction 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B Shell 503,500 60.66 503,500 95.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B10 Superstructure 164,300 19.80 164,300 31.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B20 Exterior Enclosure 180,200 21.71 180,200 34.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B30 Roofing 159,000 19.16 159,000 30.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

C Interiors 280,100 33.75 196,100 37.00 84,000 28.00 0 0.00

C10 Interior Construction 97,500 11.75 79,500 15.00 18,000 6.00 0 0.00

C20 Stairs 6,000 0.72 0 0.00 6,000 2.00 0 0.00

C30 Interior Finishes 176,600 21.28 116,600 22.00 60,000 20.00 0 0.00

D Services 443,500 53.43 344,500 65.00 99,000 33.00 0 0.00

D10 Conveying Systems 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

D20 Plumbing 26,500 3.19 26,500 5.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

D30 HVAC 217,600 26.22 169,600 32.00 48,000 16.00 0 0.00

D40 Fire Protection Systems 37,800 4.55 31,800 6.00 6,000 2.00 0 0.00

D 50 Electrical Systems 161,600 19.47 116,600 22.00 45,000 15.00 0 0.00

E Equipment and Furnishings 139,100 16.76 37,100 7.00 102,000 34.00 0 0.00

E10 Equipment 25,600 3.08 10,600 2.00 15,000 5.00 0 0.00

E 20 Furnishings 113,500 13.67 26,500 5.00 87,000 29.00 0 0.00

F Special Construction and Demolition 12,000 1.45 0 0.00 12,000 4.00 0 0.00

F10 Covered Entry/Pergola 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

F20 Selective/Building Demolition 12,000 1.45 0 0.00 12,000 4.00 0 0.00

F20 Asbestos Abatement 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub Total Building Cost 1,547,800 186.48 1,250,800 236.00 297,000 99.00 0 0.00

G Building Sitework 161,100 19.41 143,100 27.00 18,000 6.00

G10 Site Preparation 12,100 1.46 10,600 2.00 1,500 0.50

G20 Site Improvements 69,600 8.39 63,600 12.00 6,000 2.00

G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities 53,700 6.47 47,700 9.00 6,000 2.00

G40 Site Electrical Utilities 18,900 2.28 15,900 3.00 3,000 1.00

G90 Other Site Construction 6,800 0.82 5,300 1.00 1,500 0.50

Sub Total Construction 1,708,900 205.89 1,393,900 263.00 315,000 105.00

General Conditions/Requirements 12.00% 205,068 24.71 167,268 31.56 37,800 12.60

Escalation to mid point of construction (1Q2017) 8.16% 156,180 18.82 127,391 24.04 28,788 9.60

Estimating Contingency 15.00% 310,522 37.41 253,284 47.79 57,238 19.08

Permit Fee 0.50% 11,903 1.43 9,709 1.83 2,194 0.73

Construction Contingency Excluded Excluded Excluded

Total Construction Cost 2,392,573 288.26 1,951,552 368.22 441,021 147.01

ConsolidatedPhase 1A - Learning

Commons (new)Phase 1B - Stoddard

(Reno - Heavy) Phase 1 C - NIC



March 13, 2015

Phase 2

Gross Floor Area (sf) = 43,150 20,100 3,900 5,700 2,100 11,350

Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf

A Substructure 649,800 15.06 422,100 21.00 136,500 35.00 91,200 16.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

A10 Foundations 549,300 12.73 321,600 16.00 136,500 35.00 91,200 16.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

A20 Basement Construction 100,500 2.33 100,500 5.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B Shell 2,116,275 49.04 1,261,275 62.75 370,500 95.00 484,500 85.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B10 Superstructure 1,028,100 23.83 663,300 33.00 148,200 38.00 216,600 38.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B20 Exterior Enclosure 731,400 16.95 402,000 20.00 101,400 26.00 228,000 40.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B30 Roofing 356,775 8.27 195,975 9.75 120,900 31.00 39,900 7.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

C Interiors 1,644,600 38.11 814,050 40.50 148,200 38.00 216,600 38.00 23,100 11.00 442,650 39.00

C10 Interior Construction 769,500 17.83 381,900 19.00 70,200 18.00 102,600 18.00 10,500 5.00 204,300 18.00

C20 Stairs 41,500 0.96 30,150 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 11,350 1.00

C30 Interior Finishes 833,600 19.32 402,000 20.00 78,000 20.00 114,000 20.00 12,600 6.00 227,000 20.00

D Services 2,457,900 56.96 1,286,400 64.00 241,800 62.00 353,400 62.00 31,500 15.00 544,800 48.00

D10 Conveying Systems 90,450 2.10 90,450 4.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

D20 Plumbing 76,425 1.77 40,200 2.00 7,800 2.00 11,400 2.00 0 0.00 17,025 1.50

D30 HVAC 1,230,850 28.52 623,100 31.00 124,800 32.00 182,400 32.00 16,800 8.00 283,750 25.00

D40 Fire Protection Systems 212,075 4.91 110,550 5.50 23,400 6.00 34,200 6.00 4,200 2.00 39,725 3.50

D 50 Electrical Systems 848,100 19.65 422,100 21.00 85,800 22.00 125,400 22.00 10,500 5.00 204,300 18.00

E Equipment and Furnishings 289,700 6.71 150,750 7.50 33,150 8.50 42,750 7.50 6,300 3.00 56,750 5.00

E10 Equipment 47,950 1.11 20,100 1.00 5,850 1.50 8,550 1.50 2,100 1.00 11,350 1.00

E 20 Furnishings 241,750 5.60 130,650 6.50 27,300 7.00 34,200 6.00 4,200 2.00 45,400 4.00

F Special Construction and Demolition 155,825 3.61 15,075 0.75 5,850 1.50 39,900 7.00 4,200 2.00 90,800 8.00

F10 Covered Entry/Pergola 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

F20 Selective/Building Demolition 155,825 3.61 15,075 0.75 5,850 1.50 39,900 7.00 4,200 2.00 90,800 8.00

F20 Asbestos Abatement 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub Total Building Cost 7,314,100 169.50 3,949,650 196.50 936,000 240.00 1,228,350 215.50 65,100 31.00 1,135,000 100.00

G Building Sitework 882,600 20.45 542,700 27.00 105,300 27.00 153,900 27.00 12,600 6.00 68,100 6.00

G10 Site Preparation 66,125 1.53 40,200 2.00 7,800 2.00 11,400 2.00 1,050 0.50 5,675 0.50

G20 Site Improvements 383,300 8.88 241,200 12.00 46,800 12.00 68,400 12.00 4,200 2.00 22,700 2.00

G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities 294,200 6.82 180,900 9.00 35,100 9.00 51,300 9.00 4,200 2.00 22,700 2.00

G40 Site Electrical Utilities 102,550 2.38 60,300 3.00 11,700 3.00 17,100 3.00 2,100 1.00 11,350 1.00

G90 Other Site Construction 36,425 0.84 20,100 1.00 3,900 1.00 5,700 1.00 1,050 0.50 5,675 0.50

Sub Total Construction 8,196,700 189.96 4,492,350 223.50 1,041,300 267.00 1,382,250 242.50 77,700 37.00 1,203,100 106.00

General Conditions/Requirements 12.00% 983,604 22.79 539,082 26.82 124,956 32.04 165,870 29.10 9,324 4.44 144,372 12.72

Escalation to mid point of construction (1Q2020) 21.67% 1,989,372 46.10 1,090,311 54.24 252,728 64.80 335,478 58.86 18,858 8.98 291,997 25.73

Estimating Contingency 15.00% 1,675,451 38.83 918,261 45.68 212,848 54.58 282,540 49.57 15,882 7.56 245,920 21.67

Permit Fee 0.50% 64,226 1.49 35,200 1.75 8,159 2.09 10,831 1.90 609 0.29 9,427 0.83

Construction Contingency Excluded Excluded Excluded Excluded Excluded Excluded

Total Construction Cost 12,909,353 299.17 7,075,205 352.00 1,639,990 420.51 2,176,968 381.92 122,373 58.27 1,894,817 166.94

ConsolidatedPhase 2A - Stoddard

(New)Phase 2B - Stoddard

(New)Phase 2C - Stoddard

(New)Phase 2C - Stoddard

(Reno - Light)Phase 2C - Stoddard

(Reno - Heavy)



March 13, 2015

Phase 3

Gross Floor Area (sf) = 6,735 4,000 450 2,285

Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf Element ($) $/sf

A Substructure 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

A10 Foundations 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

A20 Basement Construction 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B Shell 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B10 Superstructure 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B20 Exterior Enclosure 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

B30 Roofing 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

C Interiors 250,065 37.13 156,000 39.00 4,950 11.00 89,115 39.00

C10 Interior Construction 115,380 17.13 72,000 18.00 2,250 5.00 41,130 18.00

C20 Stairs 6,285 0.93 4,000 1.00 0 0.00 2,285 1.00

C30 Interior Finishes 128,400 19.06 80,000 20.00 2,700 6.00 45,700 20.00

D Services 308,430 45.80 192,000 48.00 6,750 15.00 109,680 48.00

D10 Conveying Systems 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

D20 Plumbing 9,428 1.40 6,000 1.50 0 0.00 3,428 1.50

D30 HVAC 160,725 23.86 100,000 25.00 3,600 8.00 57,125 25.00

D40 Fire Protection Systems 22,898 3.40 14,000 3.50 900 2.00 7,998 3.50

D 50 Electrical Systems 115,380 17.13 72,000 18.00 2,250 5.00 41,130 18.00

E Equipment and Furnishings 32,775 4.87 20,000 5.00 1,350 3.00 11,425 5.00

E10 Equipment 6,735 1.00 4,000 1.00 450 1.00 2,285 1.00

E 20 Furnishings 26,040 3.87 16,000 4.00 900 2.00 9,140 4.00

F Special Construction and Demolition 51,180 7.60 32,000 8.00 900 2.00 18,280 8.00

F10 Covered Entry/Pergola 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

F20 Selective/Building Demolition 51,180 7.60 32,000 8.00 900 2.00 18,280 8.00

F20 Asbestos Abatement 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub Total Building Cost 642,450 95.39 400,000 100.00 13,950 31.00 228,500 100.00

G Building Sitework 40,410 6.00 24,000 6.00 2,700 6.00 13,710 6.00

G10 Site Preparation 3,368 0.50 2,000 0.50 225 0.50 1,143 0.50

G20 Site Improvements 13,470 2.00 8,000 2.00 900 2.00 4,570 2.00

G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities 13,470 2.00 8,000 2.00 900 2.00 4,570 2.00

G40 Site Electrical Utilities 6,735 1.00 4,000 1.00 450 1.00 2,285 1.00

G90 Other Site Construction 3,368 0.50 2,000 0.50 225 0.50 1,143 0.50

Sub Total Construction 682,860 101.39 424,000 106.00 16,650 37.00 242,210 106.00

General Conditions/Requirements 12.00% 81,943 12.17 50,880 12.72 1,998 4.44 29,065 12.72

Escalation to mid point of construction (1Q2023) 36.86% 281,906 41.86 175,041 43.76 6,874 15.27 99,992 43.76

Estimating Contingency 15.00% 157,006 23.31 97,488 24.37 3,828 8.51 55,690 24.37

Permit Fee 0.50% 6,019 0.89 3,737 0.93 147 0.33 2,135 0.93

Construction Contingency Excluded Excluded Excluded Excluded

Total Construction Cost 1,209,735 179.62 751,146 187.79 29,497 65.55 429,092 187.79

ConsolidatedPhase 3A - Hopkins

Bronfman (Reno - Heavy)Phase 3B Hopkins

Bronfman (Reno - Light)Phase 3B Hopkins

Bronfman (Reno - Heavy)


Cardigan Mountain School, Academic Master Plan, Canaan, NHConceptual Cost Estimates - Gross Floor Areas

March 13, 2015

Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf) Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 1 0 0 02 5,300 0 0 2 0 0 03 0 0 0 3 0 0 04 0 0 0 4 0 0 4,000

Total 5,300 0 0 Total 0 0 4,000

Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf) Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 1 0 0 02 0 0 3,000 2 0 450 1,4503 0 0 0 3 0 0 8354 0 0 0 4 0 0 0

Total 0 0 3,000 Total 0 450 2,285

Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf) New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf) Totals0 3,800 0 0 Phase 1 5,300 0 3,000 8,3001 7,400 0 0 Phase 2 29,700 2,100 11,350 43,1502 8,900 0 0 Phase 3 0 450 6,285 6,7353 0 0 0 Totals 35,000 2,550 20,635 58,1854 0 0 0

Total 20,100 0 0

Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf)0 0 0 01 0 0 02 3,900 0 03 0 0 04 0 0 0

Total 3,900 0 0

Level New (sf) Reno - Light (sf) Reno - Heavy (sf)0 1,700 0 01 2,000 1,450 3,6002 2,000 650 7,7503 0 0 04 0 0 0

Total 5,700 2,100 11,350

Phase 2C - Stoddard

Phase 1A - Learning Commons

Phase 1B - Stoddard

Phase 1 C - NIC

Phase 3A - Hopkins Bronfman

Phase 3B - Hopkins Bronfman

Phase 2A - Stoddard

Phase 2B - Stoddard


Cardigan Campus Master Plan 2015

Documents

Transcript of Cardigan Campus Master Plan 2015