Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

13
Carbon cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US Beverly Law Oregon State University

Transcript of Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Page 1: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Carbon cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Beverly Law

Oregon State University

Page 2: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Carbon cycle dynamics within Oregon’s urban-suburban-forested-agricultural landscapes Part 1: Current Land-Use/Land-CoverPI: B.E. Law, CoIs: C. Still, T. Hilker, A. Schmidt

Objective

• Multi-scale observations and neural networks to determine how current climate and LC/LUC influence ecosystem processes

Approach

• Establish flux sites in major crops and poplar

• Compare seasonal and annual fluxes among cover types

Project # OREZFES-867

Page 3: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Flux Measurements in Crops, Poplar for Comparisons and Modeling

Page 4: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Annual Fluxes – Forests, Crops, Poplar

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2008 2009 2010

NEP (g C m-2 yr-1)

Mature Douglas-fir Mature Ponderosa Pine

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

winter wheat tall fescue poplar

NEP (gC m-2 yr-1)

Willamette Valley Biocycle Farm

Page 5: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Annual Carbon Budget for OregonInitial Estimates

Source

Sector

Fossil Fuels Forest NECB Crop NECB

Tg

CO

2 y

r-1

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Land-based carbon sink is ~30% of the equivalent of Oregon’s FFE

(Inventories, Flux sites, Ancillary Plots, Satellite Land Cover & Fire Emissions)

Page 6: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Carbon cycle dynamics within Oregon’s urban-suburban-forested-agricultural landscapes: Part 2 Future Climate & Land-Use/Land-Cover PI: B.E. Law, CoIs: C. Still, T. Hilker, A. Schmidt (Oregon State University), Collaborator: T. Hudiburg (UI)

Objective

• Investigate future climate variability and effects of land cover and land use changes on terrestrial processes

Approach

• Reduce uncertainties in CLM projections

• Simulate future climate effects on ecosystem processes

• Simulate thinning of vulnerable forests, LUC non-forage crop to poplar

Project # OREZFES-868

Model underestimated NEP in high biomass forests L: Difference between prior and posteriori NEPR: Current non-forage grass crops

Page 7: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Land Cover Willamette Valley

Vegetation Type / Crops

Alfalfa

Apples

Barley

Barren

Blueberries

Broccoli

Buckwheat

Cabbage

Caneberries

Cauliflower

Cherries

Christmas Trees

Clover/Wildflowers

Corn

Cucumbers

Dbl Crop WinWht/Corn

Deciduous Forest

Developed/High Intensity

Developed/Low Intensity

Developed/Med Intensity

Developed/Open Space

Dry Beans

Evergreen Forest

Fallow/Idle Cropland

Flaxseed

Garlic

Grapes

Grass/Pasture

Greens

Herbaceous Wetlands

Herbs

Hops

Mint

Misc Vegs & Fruits

Mixed Forest

Mustard

Oats

Onions

Open Water

Other Crops

Other Hay/Non Alfalfa

Other Tree Crops

Peaches

Pears

Peas

Peppers

Perennial Ice/Snow

Plums

Potatoes

Pumpkins

Radishes

Rape Seed

Rye

Shrubland

Sod/Grass Seed

Sorghum

Spring Wheat

Squash

Strawberries

Sugarbeets

Sunflower

Sweet Corn

Triticale

Turnips

Vetch

Walnuts

Winter Wheat

Woody Wetlands

Page 8: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Conversion from Coal to Bioenergy – Oregon

~3 Tg torrefied biomass per year needed to run 518 MW power plant at base load

Optimize for minimizing impacts on forests, sustainable supply

Page 9: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Future C Stocks and Emissions – Oregon

In progress:

NECB and C stocks in forests post-thinning

NECB and C stocks on agr land if convert 150K ha non-forage grass to poplar (100% conversion unlikely).

Maximum potential supply of biomass to electric facility, and uncertainties

Refine Life Cycle Assessment of emissions from land post-harvest, transport, torrefaction, pelletization, fossil fuel displacement

Assessment of effects of LUC to poplar on carbon and water cycle

Page 10: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Forest Die-off, Climate Change, and Human Intervention in Western North AmericaPI: P. Mote, Co-lead PI: B.E. Law (OSU) Co-Is: A. Plantinga (UC-SB), J. Hicke (UI)

Objectives

• Improve ability to predict mortality

• Map vulnerability of forests to mortality under present and future climate

• Assess & reduce uncertainty in forecast

Approach

• CLM: Drought- and beetle-related mortality

• Economic model to optimize thinning of vulnerable forests

• Life Cycle Assessment

Project #:OREW-2013-00628

(Berner et al. in rev)NASA fellowship

Page 11: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Forest Biomass Mortality – Western US (2002-2012)

Negative water balance is the dominant driver of mortality in the W US

Dry ecoregions were exposed to below-average water availability for longer duration

(Berner & Law 2015)

Water availability

Biomassdensity

Page 12: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

(Berner et al. BGD 2016)

Water Availability Mean Over Western US (1985-2014)

Page 13: Carboy cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US

Mean Magnitude (kg * m-1 s-1)60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130L

oc

ati

on

of

Ma

xim

um

Mo

istu

re T

ran

sp

ort

(la

titu

de N

)

36

38

40

42

44

46

11 Yr Mean

Perturbed Physics Default Physics setting1 Standard DeviationReanalysis Datasets

Simulated Moisture Transport over NE Pacific

Aim: Parameterize global model to bring correct amount of moisture into western boundary of regional model

Default: Location of the jet is too far N and not enough moisture

Several parameter sets improve jet location and moisture transport