Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

download Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

of 12

Transcript of Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    1/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    2/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    3/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    4/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    5/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    6/12

    23 Mar. Ecol. Prog. S er. 36: 225-236, 987

    crozooplankton. Production of herbivorous zooplank-ton is 72 tonnes C yr-l ; assuming a 20 transferefficiency (Parsons et al. 1977, Walsh 1981, Walsh et al.1981) 380 tonnes yr -l are required for zooplankton

    food. In 1981 there w ere 1239 m2 of mussel raft s and,assuming a consumption of 0.06 tonnes C m-2 yr-', 68tonnes yr I would be consumed. Wild mussels areestimated to consume less than 10 tonnes C F-'.Phytoplankton respiration consumes a proportion ofthe available carb on, 10 to 40 OO of total carbon produc-tion (Bu nis 1980). In making the p resent calculations a

    Carbon budget

    A carbon flow diagram for the Killary Harbour sys-tem is shown in Fig. 2. Symbols are taken from Odum

    (1972). Particulate ca rbon inp ut to th e system is esti-mated to be: phytoplankton, 1306 tonnes C yr-l; mac-roalgae, 50 tonnes C yr-'; benthic microalgae, 51tonnes C yr- l; river carbon, 500 tonnes C F- ; makinga total of 1907 tonn es C yr-l.

    This carbon is consumed by zooplankt on, wildmussels, cultured mussels, benthos, bacteria and rni-

    Table 7. Biomass (AFDW: mg m- SE) of e ach ben thic spec ies in each sector

    Species Trophic role Sector

    A B C DE

    MolluscaNucula turgidaAbra nitidaThyasira flexuosa

    DepositDepositDeposit/SuspensionDeposit/SuspensionSuspensionSuspensionSuspensionSuspensionSuspension

    Myrtea spinifera

    Dosinia exoletaVenus ova taMya trunca taEnsis sihquaTum'tella communis

    AnnelidaMelinna palma taAmphicteus gunneriNotomastus latericeusOwenia fusiformisNephthys h ystricusNephthys hombergiMarph ysa belliHyalinoeda bilineataStenelais boa

    PhoronidaPhoronis m uellen

    EchinodermataAmphiura chiajeiCuccuma ria e longa taThyone fusus

    DepositDepositDepositSuspensionPredatorPredatorPredatorPredatorPredator

    Suspension

    DepositDepositDeposit

    CrustaceaUpogebia delfauraHyppolyte sp.

    CnidariaEd wardsia ca lh orp ha

    SuspensionDeposit

    Predator

    SipunculidaGolfingia elongataGolfingia proceraGolfingia vulgarisPhascolion strom bi

    DepositDepositDepositDeposit

    RhyncocoelaNemertinea sp Predator

    Single, or only, large specimens

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    7/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    8/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    9/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    10/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    11/12

  • 8/10/2019 Carbon Budget for a Coastal Inlet in Relation To

    12/12

    236 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 36: 225-236, 1987

    Ryan, T. H., Rodhouse, P. G., Roden, C. M,, Hensey, M. P.1986). Zooplankton fauna of W a r y Harbour: the sea-

    sonal cycle of abu ndanc e. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 66:731-748

    Ryther, J. H. 1969). The potentia l of th e estuary for shellfish

    production. Proc. natn. Shellfish Ass. 59: IS 2 2Sande rs, H. L. 1956). The biology of marine bottom com-munities. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. CoU. 15: 344 414

    Tenore, K. R., Boyer, L. G., Cal, R. M., Corral, J., Garcia-Femandez, C., Gonzalez, N . Gonzalez-Gurriaran, E.,Hanson. R. B.. Igle sias, J., Krom, M., Lopez-Jamar , E.McLain, J., Pamatrnat, M. M., Perez, A., Rhoads, D. C., deSantiago. G., Tietjen, J., Westrich, J., Windom, H. L.1982). Coastal upwelling in the Rias Bajas, NW Spain:

    contrast ing the bent hic regimes of the Rias de Arosa andde Muros. J. mar. Res. 40: 701-772

    Tenore, K. R. Gonzalez, N. 1976). Food chain patterns in theh a d e Arosa, Spain: an area of intense mussel aquacul-ture. In: Persoone, G.. Jaspers, E. ed.) 10th EuropeanSymposium on Marine Biology, Ostend, Belgium, Vol. 2Populabon dynamics. Universa Press, Wetteren, p.601-619

    Thorson, G. 1957). Bottom communities sublittoral orshallow shelf). Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 67: 461-534

    Uye. S. 1982). Population dyna mics and production of cartiad u s u Giesbrecht Copepoda:Cal anoida) n inlet waters.J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 57: 55-83

    Walsh, J. J. 1981). Shelf-sea ecosystems. In: Longhurst. A. R.ed.) Analysis of marine ecosystems. Academic Press, NewYork, p. 15S 196

    Walsh, J J . , Rowe, G. T., Iver son, R. L., McRoy, C P. 1981).Biological export of shelf carbon is a sink of the globalCO, cycle. Natur e, Lond. 291: 196-201

    Warwick, R. M., George, C. L. Davies, J. R. 1978). Annualmacrofauna production in a Ve n u s community. Estuar.coast. mar. Sci. 7: 215-241

    Wlddows, J., Fieth, P., Worrall, C. M. 1979). Relationshipsbetween seston, available food and feeding activity in thecommon mussel Mytilus edulis Mar. Biol. 50: 195-207

    Yip, S. Y. 1982). A note on the effect of preservingctenophores in formaldehyde-seawater. Ir. Nat. J. 20:4 1 6 4 1 9

    Zaika, V . E. 1972). Specific production of aquatic inverteb-rates. Wiley, New York

    This article was presented by Dr. R. M. Warwick; it was accepted for prinhng on December 22. 1986