CAR Saturday, October 10, 2015 Modeling Narrow Channel Textured Networks Meg Noah and Young-Kyun...
-
Upload
abner-henry -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of CAR Saturday, October 10, 2015 Modeling Narrow Channel Textured Networks Meg Noah and Young-Kyun...
CAR Friday, April 21, 2023
Modeling Narrow Channel Modeling Narrow Channel Textured NetworksTextured Networks
Meg Noah and Young-Kyun KwonMeg Noah and Young-Kyun KwonDepartment of Physics and Applied Physics, Department of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts, LowellUniversity of Massachusetts, LowellNanomanufacturing Center of ExcellenceNanomanufacturing Center of ExcellenceCenter for High-rate NanomanufacturingCenter for High-rate NanomanufacturingIn collaboration with Seunghun Hong at Seoul National University, In collaboration with Seunghun Hong at Seoul National University, KoreaKorea
[email protected][email protected]
22 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
2
2
4.26
th
SL
Not Connected Semiconductor
Metallic
Classification of ChannelsClassification of ChannelsSemiconductorsMetallic
Nanotube Properties-2
NT.64NTμm for =3μm L
33 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
MotivationMotivation Traditional isotropic models
present manufacturing showstoppers!
Modeling community has not yet Modeling community has not yet produced statistical simulations of produced statistical simulations of anisotropic nanotube networks.anisotropic nanotube networks.
Affordable solutions of nanotubes are mixed chiralty, and when the density is too high, the channels are conductors.
Even when the channel is semiconducting, the on-off ratio is poor due to the presence of metallic NT.
Reported values of short channel width randomly-oriented SWNT networks ~ w1.53 pose manufacturing problems.
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 16 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 16 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
Semiconductor
Channel Properties
MetallicNot Conducting
Behnam, et al APL 2006
44 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
ObjectivesObjectives
Model electronic properties of Model electronic properties of anisotropic nanotube networks.anisotropic nanotube networks.
Determine the feasibility of using Determine the feasibility of using mixed chirality nanotubes.mixed chirality nanotubes.
Model ensembles of nanotube Model ensembles of nanotube networks from a statistical networks from a statistical characterization of a nanotube characterization of a nanotube mixture.mixture.
Extend NTFET model to sensor model.Extend NTFET model to sensor model.
55 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
MethodologyMethodology Represent the device as a 2D random network of Represent the device as a 2D random network of
nanotubes of specified length, Ls, and conductivity, nanotubes of specified length, Ls, and conductivity, G, dispersed in a channel of length, L, and width, W.G, dispersed in a channel of length, L, and width, W.
Represent the system as a network of nodes and Represent the system as a network of nodes and resistorsresistors
[Reduce the grid using Kirchhoff’s Laws][Reduce the grid using Kirchhoff’s Laws] Compute electronic propertiesCompute electronic properties Monte Carlo simulationsMonte Carlo simulations Model the distribution functions of each class Model the distribution functions of each class
(eg metallic, semiconducting, defective) as a (eg metallic, semiconducting, defective) as a function of CNT density.function of CNT density.
An analytical expression derived from model output An analytical expression derived from model output provides a fast estimation of probability of success provides a fast estimation of probability of success for a give manufacturing parameter set.for a give manufacturing parameter set.
66 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
18 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
140 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1120 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
OverviewOverview We present a model of nanotube network channels and its We present a model of nanotube network channels and its
application to high-performance nanoscale transistors.application to high-performance nanoscale transistors. The model predicts electronic properties of single The model predicts electronic properties of single
channels, and statistical metrics of ensembles of channels.channels, and statistical metrics of ensembles of channels.
Semiconductor
Channel Properties
Metallic
Not Conducting
-4 -2 0 2 40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
VG [V]
I SD [
nA
]
Length = 4 mWidth = 2 m
Density = 1 NT/ m2
Fraction Metallic = 0.3333
Semiconducting Network
77 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Take-Home MessageTake-Home Message Both experimental and simulation results show that the Both experimental and simulation results show that the
conductivity and mobility of textured network devices conductivity and mobility of textured network devices increased with reduced channel width, unlike random increased with reduced channel width, unlike random network-based or conventional silicon-based devices.network-based or conventional silicon-based devices.
Our model answers many ‘what if’ questions:Our model answers many ‘what if’ questions:– Do textured networks offer advantages over traditional Do textured networks offer advantages over traditional
percolations as environmental sensors? percolations as environmental sensors?
– Can the properties of a network in an environment be predicted if Can the properties of a network in an environment be predicted if the NT properties are statistically known?the NT properties are statistically known?
– What manufacturing parameters would result in feasible mass What manufacturing parameters would result in feasible mass production of such an environmental sensor?production of such an environmental sensor?
– What strategies, including logical combinations of sensors, work for What strategies, including logical combinations of sensors, work for optimizing selectivity? Sensitivity? optimizing selectivity? Sensitivity?
– Is it better to have optimal semiconducting properties, or better to Is it better to have optimal semiconducting properties, or better to have more NT even if the channel is more metallic?have more NT even if the channel is more metallic?
88 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
PublicationsPublications Journal ArticlesJournal Articles
– Hahm, Noah, Kwon, Jung, Diameter Selective Growth of Vertically Hahm, Noah, Kwon, Jung, Diameter Selective Growth of Vertically Aligned Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Ethanol Flow Control, Aligned Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Ethanol Flow Control, Nanotech 2008 Vol. 1Nanotech 2008 Vol. 1
– Lee, Noah, Park, Seong, Kwon, and Hong, “Textured” Network Lee, Noah, Park, Seong, Kwon, and Hong, “Textured” Network Devices: Overcoming Fundamental Limitations of Devices: Overcoming Fundamental Limitations of Nanotube/Nanowire Network-Based Devices, Small (2009)Nanotube/Nanowire Network-Based Devices, Small (2009)
– Lee, Baik, Noah, Kwon, Lee, and Hong, Nanowire and Nanotube Lee, Baik, Noah, Kwon, Lee, and Hong, Nanowire and Nanotube transistors for lab-on-a-chip applications, Lab on a Chip, Issue 16 transistors for lab-on-a-chip applications, Lab on a Chip, Issue 16 (2009)(2009)
APS PresentationsAPS Presentations– Noah and Kwon, Toward 100% Semiconducting Devices From Noah and Kwon, Toward 100% Semiconducting Devices From
Mixed Chirality Nanotube Networks (2007)Mixed Chirality Nanotube Networks (2007)– Lee, Im, Lee, Myung, Kang, and Hong, Large-Scale Array of Pristine Lee, Im, Lee, Myung, Kang, and Hong, Large-Scale Array of Pristine
Carbon Nanotube Transistors (2007)Carbon Nanotube Transistors (2007)– Noah and Kwon, Modeling Narrow Channel Textured Networks Noah and Kwon, Modeling Narrow Channel Textured Networks
(2008)(2008)– Lee, Hong, Noah, Kwon, Park, and Seong, Fabrication of Long Lee, Hong, Noah, Kwon, Park, and Seong, Fabrication of Long
Channel Carbon Nanotube Network Transistor Arrays (2008)Channel Carbon Nanotube Network Transistor Arrays (2008)– Park, Lee, Lee, Hong, Kwon, Noah, Park, Seong, Structural Control Park, Lee, Lee, Hong, Kwon, Noah, Park, Seong, Structural Control
of Carbon Nanotube Networks for High-Performance Devices (2010)of Carbon Nanotube Networks for High-Performance Devices (2010) CHN Poster PapersCHN Poster Papers
99 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Traditional Percolating SystemsTraditional Percolating Systems Derivation of percolation threshold, the critical density of Derivation of percolation threshold, the critical density of
stickssticksof a given length to percolate. Pike and Seager of a given length to percolate. Pike and Seager PRBPRB 1974 1974
Define critical stick length Define critical stick length LLSS for given density of sticks. for given density of sticks. Derivation of percolation critical exponents. Derivation of percolation critical exponents. ‘Conductivity’ exponent (‘Conductivity’ exponent (LLSS / L / LTHTH ) )22 shown to be t=1.24±0.03. shown to be t=1.24±0.03. Define anisotropy metric. Define anisotropy metric. Balberg, Binenbaum, & Anderson Balberg, Binenbaum, & Anderson PRLPRL 1983 1983
Conductivity is a power of the channel length. Conductivity is a power of the channel length. ~ ~ LLCC..
Relations of Relations of IISDSD to to LLSS for isotropic systems. for isotropic systems.Pimparker, Guo, Alam Pimparker, Guo, Alam NCNNCN at NanoHUB.org 2006 at NanoHUB.org 2006
Conductivity is a power of the average NT bundle length. Conductivity is a power of the average NT bundle length. ~ ~ LLSS
Hecht, Hu, Grüner Hecht, Hu, Grüner APLAPL 2006 2006
Conductivity is a power of the channel width for NT networks.Conductivity is a power of the channel width for NT networks. ~ ~ LLWW
. Behnam, et al . Behnam, et al APLAPL 2006 2006
2
2
4.26th
SL
1010 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
SNU New Process, Anisotropic SNU New Process, Anisotropic NetworkNetwork
1. Pattern an Alignment Key onto a substrate.
2. Assemble the CNT onto the substrate.
3. Pattern the electrodes onto the CNT channels.
4. Deposit a SiO2 film over the electrodes, CNT channel, and substrate.5. Pattern on the Gate after selective burning Back-Gate.
1111 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
IV CharacteristicsIV Characteristics
Equivalent CircuitsEquivalent Circuits
Probability Distribution of each device class (metallic, not connected, semiconductor, success, false alarm, missed detection)
Probability Distribution of each device class (metallic, not connected, semiconductor, success, false alarm, missed detection)
NTNetworkModel
Model DescriptionModel Description
WinSpice
Length/Type DistributionNanotube ConductivityContact ResistancesMeasured and ModeledEnvironmental SensitivityFunctionalized Variations
Nanotube Properties
NTNetworkSensorModel
1212 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Populate ChannelPopulate Channel
Find NT-ElectrodeIntersections
Find NT-ElectrodeIntersections
Find NT-NT CrossingsFind NT-NT Crossings
Table of Nodes/ResistorsFor Equivalent Circuit
Table of Nodes/ResistorsFor Equivalent Circuit
Compute IV CurveCompute IV Curve
Read User InputsRead User Inputs
Loop for nTrialsLoop for nTrials
Model Single NanotubeNetwork Channel
Model Single NanotubeNetwork Channel
Assign ClassificationTabulate Results
Assign ClassificationTabulate Results
Model DescriptionModel Description
Probability DistributionsFor Different Classes
IV Curves
Loop for nEnvironmentsLoop for nEnvironments
1313 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
0 1 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Width [m]
Length
[ m
] 1.0 NT/ m2
Metallic SWNT Model Value = 4 kΩ/m McEuen, P. and Ji-Yong Park,
'Electron Transport in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes', MRS Bulletin, April 2004
Predicting Predicting I-V Curves for Curves for EnsembleEnsemble
McEuen, P. and Ji-Yong Park, 'Electron Transport in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes', MRS BUlletin, April 2004
Burke, PJ 'An RF Circuit Model for Carbon Nanotubes' IEEE-NANO 2002
Ilani, et. al, 'Measurement of the quantum capacitance of interacting electrons in carbon nanotubes', Nature Physics, Vol 2, Oct. 2006
Semiconducting Nanotubes
G=C(Vg0-Vg)/L C ~ 60 aF ranges from 1000
to 20000 cm2/V s
CNT Contact Electrode
Model Value = 50 kΩ
-4 -2 0 2 40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
VG [V]
I SD [
nA
]
Length = 4 mWidth = 2 m
Density = 1 NT/ m2
Fraction Metallic = 0.3333
Semiconducting Network
Contact Points at CNT Junctions.1 to .3 Go (43 to 129 kΩ)
Model Value = 40 kΩ Yoon, et. al., Physical
Review Letters Vol. 86, No. 4, 2001
1414 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Database – NT Length, LDatabase – NT Length, LSS
1) Input length allowed to vary up to +/- input standard deviation value from a Gaussian random number. Most of our results were LS
2) Measured Lengths for 0.1 mg/mL o-dichlorobenzene SWNT suspensions
1515 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Component Model Value ReferenceNT Length Distribution
Ave=m Measurement from Seunghun Hong at Seoul National University, Korea
NT Junctions 40 kΩ 1 to .3 Go (43 to 129 kΩ) Yoon, et. al., Physical Review Letters Vol. 86, No. 4, 2001
Metal/Metal orSemi/Semi
200–400 kΩ Hecht
Metal/Semi 20000–40000 kΩ Hecht
NT Contact Electrode
50 kΩ Kwon
Metallic SWNT 4 kΩ/m McEuen, P., MRS Bulletin, April 2004
SemiconductingSWNT
G=C(Vg0-Vg)/LC ~ 60 aF~1000 to 20000 cm2/V s
McEuen, P., MRS Bulletin, April 2004Burke, PJ IEEE-NANO 2002Ilani, et. Al, Nature Physics, Vol 2,
2006
Database SummaryDatabase Summary
1616 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Nanotube Molecular Wires as Chemical SensorsJing Kong, et al., Science 287, 622 (2000)
Component Model Value Reference
Environment Parameters
Semiconducting NTG=CeC(Vg0-Vg-Ve)/L
Ve=f(gas,P,T,time,n,m)
Ce=f(gas,P,T,time,n,m)
G = f(Contact Force (nN), diameter of tubes, Landauer-Buttiker formula)
Various experimental & theoretical papers.O2, P.G. Collins, 2000NH3, NO2 J.Li, 2003 cnt networks NH2-R J.Kong, 2001HO-R T.Someya, 2003
Yoon, Mazzoni, Choi, Ihm, Louie PRL, 2001
DatabaseDatabase
Yoon, Mazzoni, Choi, Ihm, Louie PRL, 2001
1717 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Metallic10-8 A > ISD
Classification as a TransistorClassification as a Transistor
Failure in Manufacturing
Not ConnectedISD < 10-10 A
Semiconductor
IOFF < 10-10 AISD > 10-8 A
SemiconductorsMetallic
Nanotube Properties
Manufacturing
Success
1818 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Classification as a TextureClassification as a Texture
Histogram , Bundling
sin
cos
S D S D
ii
ii
L L L L
PAnisotropy
P
Anisotropic Channels
Anisotropy≠1
Isotropic Channels
Anisotropy ~ 1
1919 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Increasing Channel Length, Increasing Channel Length, LL
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1180 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
14 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
18 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
140 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1150 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
190 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1120 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
W
L
Semiconductor
Channel Properties
Metallic
Not Conducting
2020 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Increasing Channel Width, Increasing Channel Width, WW
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 16 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 1 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 2 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
120 x 8 m Fraction Metallic=0.3333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
W
L
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
W
L
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
W
L
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
W
L
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
W
L
Semiconductor
Channel Properties
Metallic
Not Conducting
2121 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Increasing Fraction of Metallic Increasing Fraction of Metallic NTNT
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0.3
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0.4
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0.35
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0.45
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
160 x 4 m Fraction Metallic=0.33333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ilit
y
0
Semiconductor
Channel Properties
Metallic
Not Conducting
2222 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Model Output AnalysisModel Output Analysis
0 0.5 1 1.50.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0=f(L,W)
ln(L)/W
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 20
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Normalizing - Length=40 m
Pro
bab
ility
/0
4 m816
0 0.5 1 1.5 20
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Normalizing - Width=4 m
Pro
bab
ility
/0
4 m82040180
2323 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
SC C M( ) ( ) ( )P P P
NC 0
1( ) 1 tanh
2P A
Analytical ExpressionAnalytical Expression
0 = Density at which 50% of devices are connected = f(L,W)μ = Asymmetry factor, value fit as 0.0404γ = Slope factor = 0.2848β = Scaling factor = 25.9704
M C( ) ( )P P f C NC( ) 1 ( )P P
f = fraction of nanotubes that are metallic
Note: Values for dimensions greater than nanotube length.
2424 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
General Result: Balberg, Binenbaum, Anderson PRL 1983 General Result: Balberg, Binenbaum, Anderson PRL 1983 ~ ~ LLSS
Validation: Scaling with NT Validation: Scaling with NT LengthLength
Note: When the tubes in the network approach 20–30 microns, the resistancealong the tube itself becomes comparable to the resistance of the junction
Hecht, APL (89) 2006Hecht, APL (89) 2006 ~ ~ LLSSa a 0 < a < 20 < a < 2Our modelOur model
2525 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Validation: Scaling Channel Validation: Scaling Channel LengthLength
Pimparkar, Guo, Alam NCN NanoHUB, 2006
Our model.
2626 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
-4 -2 0 2 40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5Semiconducting Networks
VG [V]
I SD [
nA
]
Length = 4 mWidth = 2 m
Density = 1 NT/ m2
Fraction Metallic = 0.3333
Validation: I-V Curves of Individual Validation: I-V Curves of Individual DevicesDevices
Long Channel Low Density of
CNT
ModeledModeled MeasuredMeasured
2727 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
-4 -2 0 2 450
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
VG [V]
I SD [
nA
]
Length = 4 mWidth = 2 m
Density = 1 NT/ m2
Fraction Metallic = 0.3333
Metallic Networks
Validation: I-V Curves of Individual Validation: I-V Curves of Individual DevicesDevices
Long ChannelHigh Density of CNT
ModeledModeled MeasuredMeasured
2828 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Validation: Probability of Validation: Probability of SuccessSuccess
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450.0
0.5
1.0
Pro
bab
ility
(1/m2)
Semiconducting Metallic NotConducting
Channel: 20 m x 3 m
ModeledModeled MeasuredMeasured
2929 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
10 15 20 25 30 35 400.0
0.5
1.0
Pro
bab
ility
(1/m2)
Semiconducting Metallic NotConducting
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0
20 x 16 m Fraction Metallic=0.33333
[1/m2]
Pro
bab
ility
Validation: Probability of Validation: Probability of SuccessSuccess
Channel: 20 m x 16 m
ModeledModeled MeasuredMeasured
3030 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
ModeledModeled
Validation: Ensemble Validation: Ensemble ConductivityConductivity
MeasuredMeasured
-1conductivity S cm
length [micron] model input
channel width [micron] model input
source-drain voltage V model input
effective channel thickness cm
source-drain
SD
SD
SD
SD
L IV W t
L
W
V
t
I
current (computed) A
3131 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Validation: Ensemble MobilityValidation: Ensemble Mobility
0
2 -1 -1
0
mobility cm V s
length [micron] model input
channel width [micron] model input
source-drain voltage V model input
capacitance per unit
channel area V
SD
SD G
SD
dIL
C V W dV
L
W
V
C
-1 -2 8 C cm fit at 1.65 10
source-drain current (computed) A
gate voltage V model input
SD
G
I
V
ModeledModeled MeasuredMeasured
3232 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Modeling NT Network SensorsModeling NT Network Sensors Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics
– sensitivitysensitivity– stabilitystability– selectivityselectivity
ClassificationClassification– SuccessSuccess– Missed DetectionMissed Detection– False Alarm (ID)False Alarm (ID)– False Alarm (Quantity)False Alarm (Quantity)
Sensor SuitesSensor Suites– Evaluating Selective Evaluating Selective
StrategiesStrategies Two channels with Two channels with
different responses to different responses to same gas used to same gas used to logically logically
– VotingVoting– Dynamic Range and Dynamic Range and
SensitivitySensitivity– Improved samplingImproved sampling– Dynamic FlowDynamic Flow
3333 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Success in Sensing
Failure in Sensing
Classification as a SensorClassification as a Sensor
Missed Detection False Alarm(Identify)
PositiveDetection
Sensitivity, Stability, Response Time
vs
3434 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Sensor Model ResultsSensor Model Results
4 micron x 1 micron, 1/3 metallic NT, ‘saturated’
A=4.0 E=6.4 Scm-1
@ Vg=-0.75 V
3535 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Sensor Model ResultsSensor Model Results
4 micron x 1 micron, 1/3 metallic NT, ‘saturated’
A=11.7 E=17 Scm-1
3636 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Sensor Model ResultsSensor Model Results
4 micron x 1 micron, 1/3 metallic NT, ‘saturated’
A=94.8 E=105.3 Scm-1
3737 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Concept for an AccelerometerConcept for an Accelerometerfor microgravityfor microgravity
Structural relaxation of a (5,5) Structural relaxation of a (5,5) crossed SWNT junction with a 15 crossed SWNT junction with a 15 nN contact force.nN contact force.
Contact distance (.25 nm) Contact distance (.25 nm) reduced by 20% from the van der reduced by 20% from the van der Waals distance.Waals distance.
Center-to-center distance is 0.74 Center-to-center distance is 0.74 nm. (Free space distance would nm. (Free space distance would be about 1.01 nm)be about 1.01 nm)
Tried a 4x1 (very anisotropic) Tried a 4x1 (very anisotropic) channel:channel:20 20 junction = 2.94 µA at V junction = 2.94 µA at VGG=-6V=-6V40 40 junction = 2.87 µA junction = 2.87 µA
3838 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
SummarySummary
We have developed a model for estimating We have developed a model for estimating the probability of successful and defective the probability of successful and defective semiconductors resulting from a set of semiconductors resulting from a set of manufacturing parameters.manufacturing parameters.– For example, over 90% of an ensemble of 40x2 µm For example, over 90% of an ensemble of 40x2 µm
nanotube networks, of nanotube networks, of 11//33 metallic content and 4 metallic content and 4 NT/µmNT/µm22, will have semiconductor properties. , will have semiconductor properties.
– An analytical function was fit to model output.An analytical function was fit to model output. We can predict the We can predict the II--VV Curves of the Curves of the
nanotube networks by finding an equivalent nanotube networks by finding an equivalent circuit of resistors and nodes.circuit of resistors and nodes.
3939 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
ConclusionsConclusions
Our results:Our results:
Explain why measurements of textured Explain why measurements of textured networks show improved conductivity with networks show improved conductivity with narrow channels.narrow channels.
Show that traditional percolation models are Show that traditional percolation models are insufficient for textured networks.insufficient for textured networks.
Characterize nanotube network ensembles.Characterize nanotube network ensembles.
Model the network Model the network II--VV, , , , in different in different environments.environments.
4040 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Future WorkFuture Work
Expand database of nanotube parametersExpand database of nanotube parameters– Dispersions with bundlingDispersions with bundling– Substrate dependenceSubstrate dependence– Environmental factors Environmental factors – Model SWNT transmissionModel SWNT transmission– Different nanotubes – Nickel or Gold Different nanotubes – Nickel or Gold
Model ensemble statistics ofModel ensemble statistics of II--VV curves and curves and values quantifying production parameters in values quantifying production parameters in terms of mobility, dynamic range, etc.terms of mobility, dynamic range, etc.
Connection to percolation modelsConnection to percolation models Verification and validation with Verification and validation with
experimental dataexperimental data
4141 of 15 of 15
This work was supported under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award # NSF-0425826)
Future WorkFuture Work
DeDefect Analysisfect Analysis Additional V&VAdditional V&V Model nanotube network Model nanotube network
performance as a sensor performance as a sensor Functionalization forFunctionalization for
selectivity:selectivity:Ara h 1 moleculeAra h 1 molecule
Maleki, Soheila J., et. al, The Journal of Immunology, 2000