Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks
-
Upload
chantale-larsen -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks
![Page 1: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic
BanksDr. Habib Ahmed
![Page 2: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Lecture Plan Background Need for Bank Regulation Banking Regulatory Frameworks
Basel I (1988) Basel II (2006)
Regulatory Framework of Islamic Banks—IFSB Approach (2005)
Conclusion
![Page 3: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Background The banking industry is one of the
most regulated sectors Reasons of regulation:
One of most leveraged industries—protection against bankruptcy
Protect depositors/consumers Monetary, financial, and economic
stability (systemic risks)
![Page 4: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Background (2)
Basic balance sheet relationship:A=L+E
Or Net-worth=A-L=EIf –(Net-worth) E the firm is bankrupt
Assets Liabilities
AssetsDeposits/DebtCapital/Equity
![Page 5: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Role of CapitalExamples: Case 1: E=10State 0: A=100, L=90, E=10;State 1: A=95, L=90, E=5;State 2: A=85, L=90, E=-5; (Bankrupt)Case 2: E=20State 0: A=100, L=80, E=20;State 1: A=95, L=80, E=15;State 2: A=85, L=80, E=5
More risks need more capital (to avoid bankruptcy)
![Page 6: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Regulatory Capital Adequacy
Regulatory capital was initially identified by capital-ratio defined as:
Total Capital/Total Assets Imposing one capital ratio to all banks
was not prudent Some banks were engaged in riskier
activities than others Later Capital ratio evolved to
Total Capital/ Total Risk Assets
![Page 7: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Basel I Standards Basel Accord of 1988—standardized
bank capital requirements internationally
Types of regulatory bank capital Tier 1 Capital (core capital): common
stock, retained earnings, perpetual preferred stock, etc.
Tier 2 Capital (supplemental capital): Loan loss reserves, unpaid dividends, etc.
![Page 8: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Risk-Weighed Assets—Classification
Assets classified into 4 categories depending on credit risk Lowest risk category (no default risk)—0 risk
weight [e.g., Government bonds] 2nd Lowest risk category (low default risk)–20%
risk weight [e.g., interbank deposits, fully backed mortgage bonds, etc.]
3rd risk category (low to moderate default risk)—50% risk weight [e.g., municipal bonds, residential mortgages, etc.]
4th risk category (moderate to high default risk)—100% risk weight [e.g., all other loans, commercial papers, etc.]
![Page 9: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Basel I Capital Requirements
Capital Ratio Requirements: Ratio of total capital (Tier 1 &2) to risk weighted
assets must be at least 8 percent.
Capital Ratio=Total Capital/ Total Risk Assets=8%
Note: When an asset has a risk weight of 100%, the capital charge on it
is 8% When an asset has a risk weight of 50%, the capital charge on it
is 4%
![Page 10: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Capital Requirements—Example
Assets LiabilitiesCash 5,000Govt. Bonds 20,000Deposits at Banks 5,000Loans for Residential Properties 10,000Loans to Private Corporations 60, 000
Deposits/Debt 95,000Total Capital 5,000
Total 100,000
Total 100,000
![Page 11: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Capital Requirements—Example (contd…)
0% Risk WeightCashGovt. Bonds
5,00020,00025,000 x 0 = 0
20% Risk WeightBalances with Banks 5,000
5,000 x 0.2 = 1000
50% Risk WeightLoans for Residential Properties
10,00010,000 x 0.5 = 5000
100% Risk WeightLoans to Private Corporations60,000
60,000 x 1.0 = 60,000
Total Risk Weighted Assets66,000
![Page 12: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Capital Requirements—Example (contd…)
Total Assets =100,000 Total Risk Weighted Assets=66,000 Total Capital=5,000
Capital Ratio without risk weights Total Capital/Total
Assets=5,000/100,000=5% Capital Ratio with risk weights
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets=5,000/66,000=7.6%
![Page 13: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Capital Requirements—Example (contd…)
Two Banks A and B (with same assets and capital value)
Bank A (relatively more risky assets) Total Assets =100,000 Total Capital=5,000 Risk weighted Assets=75,000 Capital Ratio with risk weights
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets=5,000/75,000=6.7% Bank A (relatively less risky assets)
Total Assets =100,000 Total Capital=5,000 Risk weighted Assets=55,000 Capital Ratio with risk weights
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets=5,000/55,000=9.1%
![Page 14: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Capital Requirements—Example (contd…)
Regulatory Capital Requirements—8 % Bank A is undercapitalized (6.7%)—holding
less capital than required by regulation. It can increase its capital by:
Issuing new shares Reducing dividends (i.e., increasing retained earnings)
Reallocating assets (opt for less riskier assets) Bank B is overcapitalized (9.1%)– holding
more capital than regulatory capital It can reduce capital by:
Buying back shares Increasing dividends (i.e., decreasing retained
earnings). Reallocating assets (opt for more riskier assets)
![Page 15: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Basel I Capital Requirements—
Conclusions and Issues Regulatory Capital Requirements is 8%
of risk-based assets Composition of assets determines the
capital requirements Only Credit risk considered—does not
include market and operational risks Banks exposed to significant market
and operational risks (changes in interest rate, currencies, commodities, stock prices, etc.)
![Page 16: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Basel II Standards To fill in the gaps and to come up with an
appropriate regulatory capital requirements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision initiated the Basel II standards in 1993
The standards were finally completed in June 2006
The Standards are complicated and complex (251 pages)
[http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm]
![Page 17: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Basel II Standards—Main Features
A framework to further strengthen the soundness and stability of the international banking system
A more risk-sensitive capital requirements Three Pillars
Minimum Capital Requirements Supervisory Review Process Market Discipline
Minimum Capital Requirements—considers credit, market and operational risks
Not one, but different approaches to arrive at capital requirements
![Page 18: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Basel II Standards—Credit Risk
Credit Risk—Standardized Approach, Internal Ratings Based Approach, Securitization Framework
Credit Risk—different risk weights are given for various types of clients (Sovereign, public sector entities, MDBs, banks, securities firms, corporations, etc)
Example: Risk weights for corporations given below:
Credit Assessment
AAA to AA-
A+ to A-
BBB+ to BB-
Below BB-
Unrated
Risk Weight20%50%100%150%100%
![Page 19: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Basel II Standards—Market Risks
In conventional banking, Market risks arise mainly in the trading book (derivatives, securities, currency, commodities, etc.)
Held short-term to benefit from price movements
Different risk-weights given to various types of items (derivatives, debt securities, etc.)
![Page 20: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Basel II Standards—Operational Risks
Operational Risk—three approaches Basic Indicator Approach Standardized Approach Advanced Measurement Approach
Basic Indicator Approach:K=GI x α
K-capital charge (for operational risk)GI-average gross income over last 3 years α – 15 %
![Page 21: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Lecture Plan Background Need for Bank Regulation Banking Regulatory Frameworks
Basel I (1988) Basel II (2006)
Regulatory Framework of Islamic Banks—IFSB Approach (2005)
Conclusion
![Page 22: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
IFSB Standards—Introduction
In December 2005 IFSB published “CAPITAL ADEQUACY STANDARD FOR INSTITUTIONS OFFERING ONLY ISLAMIC FINANCIAL SERVICES” (71 pages)
http://www.ifsb.org/ Uses the following BCBS documents to
arrive at capital requirements: International Convergence of Capital
Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, June 2004 (BASEL II 2004)
Amendment to Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks, January 1996—for Market Risks (Market Risks 1996)
![Page 23: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Typical IB Model Liability side
Profit Sharing Investment Accounts (PSIA)- mudarabah
Demand deposits-qard hasan Profit-Equalizing Reserves
(PER) Investment Risk Reserves
(IRR)
Asset side Fixed income assets
(murabahah, istisna, salam, and ijarah)
Variable income assets (mudarabah and musharakah)
Balance Sheet
Assets Liabilities
Banking Portfolio
Deposits & Debt
Trading Portfolio
ReservesEquity
![Page 24: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Issues in Capital Adequacy for IBs
Asset side: Islamic Instruments have both credit and
market risks and the risks change according to the stage of the contract
Identify the credit/market risks in the instruments and assign the appropriate risk weights (from Basel II standards)
Liability side: Role of PSIA
![Page 25: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
IFSB Capital Adequacy Standards—Basic Elements
Credit Risk: Standardized Approach (BASEL II 2004)
Operational Risk: Basic Indicator Approach (BASEL II 2004)
Market Risk: Applications from Market Risk 1996.
![Page 26: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Capital Requirements— Example (1): Salam
contract Applicable Stage of the Contract
Credit RWMarket Risk Capital Charge
Payment of Purchase Price by the IIFS to a Salam customer
Based on customer’s rating or 100% RW for unrated customer
The Simplified Approach15% capital charge on long position of salam exposures
Receipt of the purchased commodity by the IIFS
Not Applicable
The purchased commodity is sold and delivered to a buyer
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
![Page 27: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Capital Requirements— Example (2): Operating Ijarah
Applicable Stage of the Contract
Credit RWMarket Risk Capital Charge
Asset available for lease (prior to signing a lease contract
Binding Promise to Ijarah (PL)Asset Acquisition cost less (a) market value of asset fulfilling function of collateral and (b) hamish jiddiyahMultiply with the customer’s rating or 100% RW for unrated customer
Non-binding PL15% capital charge until lessee takes possession
Upon consigning a leasing contract and the lease rental payments are due from the lessee
Total estimate value of the lease receivables shall be risk-weighted according to the lessee’s rating. 100% RW for unrated customer
The residual value will be risk-weighted 100%
Maturity of the contract term and the leased asset is returned to IIFS
Not applicable15% capital charge of the carrying value of the asset
![Page 28: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
IFSB Standards Standard formula for regulatory capital
Eligible capital/[Total risk-weighted assets (credit and market risks) + Operational Risk – Risk-weighted assets funded by PSIA (credit and market risks)]
Note: Islamic Financial Instruments are more riskier—
increases capital requirements PSIA are profit/loss sharing contracts—can
share the losses—substitutes for capital (reduces capital requirements)
![Page 29: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
IFSB Standards-Example (1)
Assume Total risk weighted assets=120% of total assets= 108 Average Gross Income of last 3 years = 10 Operational Risk Capital base = 10 x 0.15=1.5 Percentage Total Assets financed by PSIA=40/90=44.4% Risk weighted assets financed by PSIA= .444 x 108=48
Standard formula for regulatory capital Eligible capital/[Total risk-weighted assets (credit and
market risks) + Operational Risk – Risk-weighted assets funded by PSIA (credit and market risks)]
= 5/[108+1.5-48] = 5/61.5 = 8.1%
AssetsLiabilitiesCash 10Total Assets 90
PSIA 40Demand Deposits 55Equity 5
![Page 30: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
IFSB Standards-Example (2)
Assume Total risk weighted=120% of total assets= 108 Average Gross Income of last 3 years = 10 Operational Risk Capital base = 10 x 0.15=1.5 Percentage Total Assets financed by PSIA=20/90=22.2% Risk weighted assets financed by PSIA= 0.222 x 108=24
Standard formula for regulatory capital Eligible capital/[Total risk-weighted assets (credit and
market risks) + Operational Risk – Risk-weighted assets funded by PSIA (credit and market risks)]
=5/[108+1.5-24]=5/85.5= 5.9%
AssetsLiabilitiesCash 10Total Assets 90
PSIA 20Demand Deposits 75Equity 5
![Page 31: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Conclusion The nature of risks in IFIs complex—
requires different regulatory standards Assets of IBs more riskier that
conventional banks Composition of both assets and liabilities
(deposits) determine the capital requirements
By sharing the risks, PSIA offsets the capital requirements of IBs riskier assets
![Page 32: Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062721/56813832550346895d9fe12b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Thank you!