Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

download Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

of 21

Transcript of Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    1/21

    576

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    .R. No. !"#$#". %&ne !7' !((7.)

    %OSE T. CAP*L*' petitioner' vs. NAT*ONAL LA+OR RELAT*ONS COMM*SS*ON' an,UN*-ERS*T O/ M*NDANAO' respon,ents.

    Labor La01 Retirement1 Arti2le "$7 o3 t4e Labor Co,e o3 t4e P4ilippines provi,es 3ort0o tpes o3 retirement a8 2omp&lsor an, b8 optional.9T4e arti2le provi,es 3ort0o tpes o3 retirement a8 2omp&lsor an, b8 optional. T4e :rst ta;es pla2e ata

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    2/21

    2ontra2t' or emploer@s retirement plan' an emploee ma optionall retire &ponrea24in< t4e a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    3/21

    57$

    57$

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    t4e a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    4/21

    2onten,e, t4at it 4as a retirement plan' ;no0n as t4e Universit o3 Min,anao HAsso2iate, Enterprises Retirement

    =================

    ! Ori

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    5/21

    B *,.' B75B.

    5 Pertinent portions t4ereo3 rea, as 3ollo0s

    ART*CLE **

    e8 IMemberJ s4all mean an emploee' as 4erein ,e:ne,' 04o 24ooses to2ontrib&te to t4e /&n, as provi,e, 3or in Arti2le *-' Se2tion !' 4ereo3. Onl members

    s4all be entitle, to an o3 t4e bene:ts provi,e, 3or &n,er t4is Plan an, to an o3 t4eCompan@s 2ontrib&tions as provi,e, 3or in Arti2le *- an, - 4ereo3.

    ART*CLE ***

    Se2tion !9Eli

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    6/21

    5$#

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    *mplementin< t4e Labor Co,e'6 04i24 also too; eGe2t on 7 %an&ar !((?' 4e 4ast4e option 04et4er or not to retire &pon attainin< t4e a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    7/21

    B." Comp&lsor retirement.94ere t4ere is no s&24 plan or a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    8/21

    T4e petitioner appeale,$ 3rom t4e ,e2ision to t4e respon,ent Commission on !#Ma !((B' or t4irteen ,as a3ter 4e re2eive, t4e Labor Arbiter@s ,e2ision. >e ar

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    9/21

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    sin2e t4e petitioner re2eive, a 2op o3 t4e assaile, ,e2ision on "7 April !((B' 4e4a, onl &ntil 7 Ma !((B to :le 4is appeal1 4o0ever' 2onsi,erin< t4at 7 Ma !((B0as a Sat&r,a' 4e 4a, &ntil ( Ma !((B' t4e net 0or;in< ,a' to :le t4e appeal.>e :le, t4e appeal onl on !# Ma !((B.!"

    T4e petitioner move, 3or t4e re2onsi,eration!? o3 t4e or,er' alle

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    10/21

    ================

    !" *,.' 7677. Per Presi,in< Commissioner M&sib M. +&at' 0it4 Commissioners Os2ar

    N. Abella an, Leon . ona

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    11/21

    Complainant@s 2o&ntermani3estation t4at t4is 0as onl Ipartial a22eptan2eJ o3 4isretirement bene:ts is belie, b t4e 2omp&tation o3 4is retirement bene:ts base, on4is len

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    12/21

    Petitioner@s motion 3or re2onsi,eration!5 o3 t4e above resol&tion 4avin< been,enie, in t4e resol&tion!6 o3 ?! Ma !((5' t4e petitioner :le, t4is petition. >ealleEN *T RENDERED T>E UEST*ONED RESOLUT*ON . . . D*SM*SS*N T>EAPPEAL *N CONTRA-ENT*ON TO T>E RUL*N O/ T>E SUPREME COURT *N T>E CASEO/ UR+ANO' SR. -S. NLRC ""( SCRA 56?8 AND OT>ERS.

    iii8 . . . *N >OLD*N T>AT T>E PET*T*ONER + ACCEPT*N T>E PROCEEDS O/ >*SRET*REMENT +ENE/*TS *S ESTOPPED /ROM PURSU*N >*S CLA*MS.

    T4e :rst assi

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    13/21

    5$5

    -OL. "7?' %UNE !7' !((7

    5$5

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    2eptan2e o3 4is retirement bene:ts amo&nte, to a 0aiver o3 4is 2laims' an, t4at 4is

    retirement 0as in a22or,an2e 0it4 UM@s retirement poli2.

    e resolve, to

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    14/21

    *n t4e absen2e o3 a retirement plan or a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    15/21

    ART. "$7. Retirement.9An emploee ma be retire, &pon rea24in< t4e retirementa

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    16/21

    5$7

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    an,Qor emploee 04o retires or is retire, 3rom t4e servi2e p&rs&ant to t4e sames4all be entitle, to all t4e retirement bene:ts provi,e, t4erein.

    **9*n t4e absen2e o3 an s&24 2ompan poli2 or 2olle2tive a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    17/21

    5$$

    5$$

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    an emploee' as 4erein ,e:ne,' 04o 24ooses to 2ontrib&te to t4e /&n, as provi,e,

    3or in Arti2le *-' Se2tion ! 4ereo3. Onl Members s4all be entitle, to an o3 t4ebene:ts provi,e, 3or &n,er t4is Plan an, to an o3 t4e Compan@s 2ontrib&tions asprovi,e, 3or in Arti2les *- an, - 4ereo3.!(

    As to elien2e' t4e above provisionson re&irements o3 members4ip an, eli

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    18/21

    T4e vali,it t4en o3 UM@s IretirementJ o3 t4e petitioner &pon t4e latter@s 6#t4 birt4anniversar on !$ A&

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    19/21

    Co&rt in UM@s 3avor. T4ese ,o2&ments are mere s2raps o3 paper' t4e bein< onlero 2opies. T4e 4ave not been 2erti:e, to be tr&e 2opies or oGere, in evi,en2ebe3ore t4e Labor Arbiter an, t4e NLRC. Neit4er 4ave t4e even been re3erre, to inUM@s 2omment in t4is 2ase.

    T4e 3ore

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    20/21

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission

    6# ears' provi,e, it is be3ore rea24in< 65 ears' 04i24 is t4e 2omp&lsor a

  • 7/25/2019 Capili vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 576(1997

    21/21

    &n,er t4e stat&te 3or s&24 retirement bene:ts. C%C Tra,in