Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Caulkins
-
Upload
cannabissummit -
Category
Science
-
view
120 -
download
1
Transcript of Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Caulkins
Regulating Marijuana As a Temptation Good
Jonathan P. CaulkinsCarnegie Mellon University Heinz College
RAND, Drug Policy Research Center
• These things are not legalization
– Eliminating mandatory minimum sentences
– Decriminalization (as in many US states since 1970s)
– Legalizing medical use within the CSA (as with cocaine)
– Legalizing personal possession and use (as in AK)
• These things are legalization, but they are not alike
– Legalizing own-growing & gifting (as in AK & DC)
– Legalizing co-ops or cannabis clubs (as in Spain)
– Government monopoly (as with lotteries)
Legalization Defined
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100Use,
Add
ictin
on, H
arm
s, Et
c.
Degree of Legalization
Dutch coffee shops
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100Use,
Add
ictin
on, H
arm
s, Et
c.
Degree to which Legalization Has Matured
Dutch coffee shops
Colorado & Washington
Price Declines of Marijuana in WA State
$0.00
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
May-14 Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 Jan-16 Apr-16
Dolla
rs p
er G
ram
Ratio of Sales Value to Weight, WA State Marijuana
Retail ($/gm)
Wholesale ($/gm)
Legalization Reduces Production Costs
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
Prod
uctio
n Co
st/P
rice
per P
ound
<-- Projected cost with light regs & no taxes -->
<-Quasi-legalization ->
Legalization with onerous regulations & no scale economies
<--- Prohibition
Americans Now Spend About 40 Billion Hours a Year “Under the Influence” of MJ
The change in the # of hours “under the influence” will be the most important MJ-specific
outcome of legalization.
What Proportion of U.S. Marijuana Market Is Associated with Adults Who Report:
(1) No abuse or dependence problems & (2) Using fewer than 10 times per month?
The Answer Depends Enormously on the Measure of Use Employed
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
PY Users PM Users Days of Use Purchases MT Used
Market Share of Adults Who Report No ABOD Problems & Using < 10 Times per Month
The Relatively Small Number of Daily Users Dominates Use & Use-Related Harm
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
PY Users PM Users Days of Use Consumption
PY not PM
1-3
4-10
11-20
21-29
30
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Number of Daily & Near Daily Users from NHSDA/NSDUH
ALCOHOL
MARIJUANA
In 1992, 10X as many people used alcohol DND
as used MJ DND.
By 2014 that ratio had fallen to 1.9 to 1.
Between 1992 and 2014 the # of DND MJ users
grew by 770%.
About Half of MJ Use is Problem-Use
Past or present drug
or alcohol ABOD/TX,
46%
No ABOD/TX, but under age 21, 8%
Adult with no
ABOD/TX, 46%
Detailed Market Segmentation
PY Users MT Used
#1: Abuse or dependent on marijuana 12% 21%
#2: Abuse or dependent on another intoxicant 18% 16%
#3: No ABOD but has received treatment 7% 9%
#4: No ABOD/TX, but under age 21 14% 8%
#5: Adult, no ABOD/TX, use 21+ days in PM 10% 35%
#6: Adult, no ABOD/TX, use 10-20 days in PM 6% 8%
#7: Adult, no ABOD/TX, use 1 - 9 days in PM 32% 2%
About Half of MJ Use is Problem-Use;Most of the Rest is High-Frequency
Past or present drug
or alcohol ABOD/TX,
46%
No ABOD/TX, but under age 21, 8%
Adult DND, no ABOD/TX,
35%
Adult 10-20X PM, no
ABOD/TX, 8%
Adult < 10X PM, no ABOD/TX, 2%
Harms of Frequent, Heavy Drug Use (Grossly Simplified)
• Alcohol: Both externalities and internalities• Cocaine/crack/meth: Both, with many
internalities being “behavioral toxicity”• Heroin: Mostly internalities but they are dramatic
(sudden death)• Tobacco: Mostly internalities, and they are
“medical” (death, albeit delayed death)• Marijuana: Mostly internalities
– No death– Few medical harms
Non-Drug Analogs of Marijuana
• Morally laden
– Prostitution, gambling, lottery tickets
• Time sinks
– Video games, pornography, reality TV
• Consumables
– Soda, Krispy Kreme donuts, death by chocolate cake