Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

download Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

of 4

Transcript of Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

  • 8/6/2019 Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

    1/4

    Urban TransitA recent 2011 Toronto Board of Trade ranking of the transportation within major

    international cities highlights the significant challenge Canada faces of urban transit.

    Measured on commute times, transit ridership, kilometers of existing rail and vehicle per

    capita, all four Canadian cities listed including Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, and

    Calgary were given either Cs or Ds (Agrell, Perreaux, et.al; Toronto Board of Trade).

    These grades portray the need to address the problems associated with Canadian urban

    transit: congestion, environmental damages, and lack of co-ordination within the

    government.

    Congestion and Environmental ConcernsCongestion proves to be a crippling fault in Canadas urban transit. Although 80

    percent of Canadas total population lives within urban centers, the population of the areas

    just outside the urban core is growing at 11 percent, twice the national average (Brender

    and Golden, 1). In addition, 50 percent of total employment is within the six biggest urban

    cities including Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, Calgary, and Edmonton

    (Abdulrasul, Appleby, et. al, 5). Therefore, about 13 million people travel to and from work

    every day, averaging about six trillion trips per year (Abdulrasul, Appleby, et. al, 4).

    Considering Canadians mainly rely on automobiles as their main transportation, the

    congestion puts pressure on the urban transportation network and systems. The reliance

    on automobiles also damages the environment resulting in noise, visual, and atmospheric

    pollution which negatively impacts public health and safety. Between 1990 and 2004, road

    vehicles contributed to 86 percent of growth in emission (Brender and Golden, 9).

  • 8/6/2019 Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

    2/4

    Congestion also burdens economic loss as it results in a loss in productivity and time and

    adds extra fuel costs.

    Lack of Co-ordinationThe inadequacy of current urban transit is partially due to the lack of efficient

    planning and collaboration among local, regional, and federal governments. Over the past

    40 years, the majority of the responsibility regarding decisions about urban transit has

    been shifted to municipal governments while the federal government offers little or no

    input or support. Therefore, there isnt a national framework to establish an effective

    urban transit plan. Funding is also inefficient as an estimated 88 percent of total

    government spending on transportation is spent on urban transit. Therefore, of the total

    $37.5 billion (in Canadian dollars) expenditures spent in 2008-2009, $31.8 billion was spent

    on roads and urban transit, leaving $6.2 billion of government spending on transportation

    industries not related to roads and urban transit. However, road networks continue to fail

    to keep up with the growing volume of cars and with 80 minute average commutes and

    substantial delays, travelers arent motivated to use public transit.

    Solution: Inter-city RailThe majority of inter-city travel is via automobiles. However, air travel also

    accounts for over half of the remaining inter-city travel. Despite receiving most of the

    public attention and funding, these modes of transit have contributed to the major

    congestion and environmental issues. Therefore, Canada should concentrate its efforts

    towards the under-funded and underdeveloped inter-city rail. A high speed inter-city rail

    system will establish a backbone between major cities, offering a faster, more frequent,

    and more convenient travel. Currently in development is VIA Rail which will serve over

  • 8/6/2019 Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

    3/4

    four million passengers annually and will operate 503 intercity, transcontinental and

    regional trains per week linking 450 communities across its 12,500 - kilometre route

    network (Andrews and Kaloutsky). In contrast to high way transit, high speed rail will

    require only moderate costs, low energy use, and allow for a higher capacity of travelers.

    As an alternative to road ways and air travel, high speed rail will bring the following

    benefits:1. Reduce highway use, accidents, and environmentally harmful congestion.2. Reduce overall emissions per passenger mile.3. Offer more transportation choices and increased mobility.

    However, improvements need to be made to air travel as it has become an essential part of

    urban development. Each major city needs to provide direct rapid transit connection from

    the city center to the airport. Also, continuous improvements are needed to keep up with

    the growth in travelers.

    Solution: National Strategy and FundingIn terms of urban transit, Toronto Board of Trade president and CEO Carol

    Wilding states that there has to be a vision brought to it across all levels of government

    because unlike other countries, Canada has never adopted a national transit strategy

    (Agrell, Perreaux, et. al). In addition, without a fixed source of funding, cities will be

    unable to keep up with growing populations. Therefore, the governments must collaborate

    to establish a national framework, thus improving the planning and development of urban

    transit. Also, the governments should allocate funds more effectively, by considering the

    different modes of transportation. A means to increase funds for urban transit spending

    would be to institute tolls. Although tolls are widely accepted and used in many countries,

  • 8/6/2019 Canadian Transportation: Urban Transit

    4/4

    Canada doesnt monopolize on the opportunity. In addition to providing additional

    funding, tolls will deter travelers from automobile usage as well as decrease congestion and

    environmental problems.Works Cited

    Abdulrasul, Fatima, Sherry Appleby, et. al. Urban Transportation in Canada: Needs and

    Opportunities. Publication. 2005. Urban Transportation Task Force. 26 Apr. 2011

    . Agrell, Siri, Les Perreaux, Wendy Stueck, and Josh Wingrove. "Transit problems across

    Canada prompt calls for politicians to address issue." Time to Lead. 25 Mar. 2011. The

    Globe and Mail. 26 Apr. 2011

    . Andrews, Malcolm, and Catherine Kaloutsky. "VIA RAIL CANADA INC. | VIA Rail is

    Transforming Inter-City Transportation in Canada, says new chairman Paul G. Smith."

    Via Rail Canada. 23 Feb. 2011. CNW Group. 26 Apr. 2011

    . Brender, Natalie, and Anne Golden.Sustainable Urban Transportation: A Winning

    Strategy for Canada. Publication. 2007. The Canada Project. The Conference Board of

    Canada. 26 Apr. 2011 ."Canadian National Railway Company (CN) | Portal for North America."Home | Portal forNorth America.Portal for North America, 2008.Web. 03 May 2011.

    ."CNI Company Profile - Canadian National Railway Company Company

    Information."MarketWatch - StockMarket Quotes, Business News, Financial News. The

    Wall Street Journal, 03 May 2011. Web. 03 May 2011..LeBlond, Patrick.2008, June.Solar Roadways - A Real Solution. Rep. Web. 26 Apr. 2011.

    . Corporate Website.TransCanada. 3 May 2011.