Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report...
Transcript of Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report...
Instructions
1. This Final Report Questionnaire must be submitted and approved by OSCIA to receive your final
payment.
2. Verify you have the proper Final Report Questionnaire for your project. This Final Report
Questionnaire is for: Water Wells (Producers) [Category Code: ESIM-PD-L]
3. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).
Purpose
The purpose of this Final Report Questionnaire is to identify the results and impact of project activities
completed, as well as client satisfaction, related to Canadian Agricultural Partnership cost-share funding for
producers. Responses will not impact your final claim; however, to receive funding under the Canadian
Agricultural Partnership, this Final Report Questionnaire must be completed.
Contact & Project Details
Final Report Questionnaire
1. What activities did you complete for this project? (Select all that apply) *
Name of Business/Organization * Project Number *
Your Name *
Primary Project Contact Name (If different than your name)
Sealing and capping of old water wells no longer in use (decommissioning)
Upgrades to existing water wells
Upgrading/maintenance of sanitary seal
Annular seal
Replace caps
This question is continued on page 2
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)
ESIM-PD-L 2.0 Page 1 of 6
2. Prior to completing your projects, how many of the following types of water
wells on your property required capping or sealing and were not suitable for
upgrade or use? (Select all the apply) *
3. How many water wells were capped and sealed (decommissioned) as a
result of your project? (Select all the apply) *
4. Prior to completing your project, did any of the following water wells on your
property require upgrading to improve the water source used for your farm
operation? (Select all the apply) *
Flow-control for an artesian well
Installation of anti-backflow protection
Grading and mounding to redirect surface flow away from the well
Extending external casing
Installation of pitless adapters
Bored or dug water well wells
Sand point water well wells
Drilled water well wells
Bored or dug water well wells
Sand point water well wells
Drilled water well wells
Bored or dug water well wells
Sand point water well wells
Drilled water well wells
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)
ESIM-PD-L 2.0 Page 2 of 6
5. As a result of this project, how many water wells were upgraded to improve
the water source used for your farm operation? (Select all the apply) *
6. Is this the first water well you have upgraded on your farm property? *
Yes
No
If no, how were other water well upgrades completed? (Select all that apply)
With support received from previous cost-share funding
programs wells
Financed by farm business (no cost-share) wells
7. As a result of the project, how likely are the following changes to occur on
your farm operation over the next five years? *
Potential Change
1
Unl ikely
This change could occur at some time but is improbable
2
Possib le
This change might occur at
some time
3
L ikely
This change w ill probably
occur
4
Almost certain
This change is expected to
occur
a) Reduced risks to ground waterquality
b ) Reduced impact from extreme weather events e.g. excess water, water shortages, high or low temperatures, high winds
c) Improved productivity of farmoperation (e.g. more consistentand secure water source forlivestock, crop production, etc.)
Bored or dug water well wells
Sand point water well wells
Drilled water well wells
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)
ESIM-PD-L 2.0 Page 3 of 6
Environmental Farm Plan (EFP)
8. Did your project address a risk identified in your EFP Action Plan? *
9. What risk area did your project help you address from your EFP Action Plan?
*
10. Estimate the percentage of actions identified in your EFP Action Plan that
you have implemented (with or without cost-share funding assistance)? *
11. Did you encounter any barriers to completing this project? *
SELECT ALL BARRIERS THAT APPLY
Yes No
If yes, indicate the change in risk rating expected as a result of completing this project:
Moving from a 1 rating to a 3 rating Moving from a 1 rating to a 4 rating
Moving from a 2 rating to a 3 rating Moving from a 2 rating to a 4 rating
Moving from a 3 rating to a 4 rating
Fourth Edition Workbook, specify Worksheet # and Question #
0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%
Yes (Indicate Below) No (Skip to Question 12)
Approval timelines (e.g. timing of approval was different than expected)
Priority/process change (e.g. changes in business priorities/processes impacted the
project)
Expertise (e.g. challenges accessing technical assistance to plan project solutions)
Financial constraints (e.g. lack of funds or cost increases)
This question is continued on page 7 This question is continued on page 5
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)
ESIM-PD-L 2.0 Page 4 of 6
Service Experience
12. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following
statements. *
1. Strongly
Disagree2. Disagree
3. Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
4. Agree5. Strongly
Agree
a. Once this project was approved, I received allthe information needed to proceed to the nextstep of the project.
b. The claim forms were easy to understandand complete.
c. I was able to reach appropriate OSCIA staffwithout difficulty.
d. OSCIA staff were knowledgeable.
e. I received consistent information from OSCIAstaff.
f. OSCIA staff were courteous.
13. Overall, how satisfied were you with the amount of time it took to get the
service that you required? *
1. Very Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied3. Neither Satisfied Nor
Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 5. Very Satisfied
Labour (e.g. insufficient labour to complete project, challenges finding qualified
contractors)
Technical (e.g. mechanical, electrical, computer systems, automation, equipment)
Time (e.g. unable to meet time requirements, ill-timed, scheduling issues)
Uncontrollable circumstances (e.g. dependency on outside sources not met, weather,
vendors, suppliers)
Other (Specify)
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)
ESIM-PD-L 2.0 Page 5 of 6
14. Overall, how satisfied were you with the service you received while
implementing this project? *
1. Very Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied3. Neither Satisfied Nor
Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 5. Very Satisfied
15. To what extent did the availability of funding assistance influence your
decision to undertake this project? *
1. Not At All 2. To a Small Extent 3. To a Moderate Extent 4. To a Great Extent
16. Provide any other comments you would like to share about your
experience related to Canadian Agricultural Partnership cost-share
funding for producers.
Submission Instructions
Review your answers and email the completed Final Report Questionnaire to
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)
ESIM-PD-L 2.0 Page 6 of 6