Canada Pension Plan Actuarial Report and its Independent ...
Transcript of Canada Pension Plan Actuarial Report and its Independent ...
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
1
Canada Pension Plan Actuarial
Report and its Independent
Peer Review Process
Presentation to the Public Service
Pension Advisory Committee
18 May 2005
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
2
• Purpose of the CPP Actuarial Report
• Demographic and Economic Assumptions
• Steady-State Funding
• Peer Review Process and Strengthening the Accountability
Presentation
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
3
Purpose of the CPP Actuarial Report
• Inform on the current and projected
financial status of the Canada Pension
Plan
• Calculate the steady-state contribution
rate
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
4
Consultations on Assumptions
• CPP and QPP seminars were organized to
get opinions from a wide range of experts
in the fields of demography, economics
and investments.
• Federal and provincial officials attended
these seminars.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
5
Demographic Assumptions
• Fertility
(Number of births)
• Migration
• Mortality
(Life expectancy)
Sources: Statistics Canada (population census and historical data),
U.N. 2002 population projections, CPP seminars
300,000 200,000 100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Age Profile of Canada's Population, 1951 & 2001
1946-1965 in 2001
Female Male
2001
1951
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
6
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031 2041
Fertility Rate
1952-1976: 3.1
1977-2001: 1.6
Assumption CPP Report
1.60 in 2016+
(Children per woman)
Panel’s views: reasonable
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
7
Net Migration Rate
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025
Assumption CPP report:
0.50% 2004 to 2015
0.54% 2020 +
Avg 1979-2003: 0.49%
Avg 1989-2003: 0.58%
Panel’s views: reasonable
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
8
Life expectancy at 65 Difference
Increase in Life Expectancies
More contributors are expected to reach the retirement age of 65.
Retirement beneficiaries are expected to receive their benefit for a longer period.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031 2041 2051
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Difference
Male
Female
Panel’s views: reasonable but they would
have chosen higher life expectancies.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
9
Population 65+
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1966 1976 1986 1996 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Number % of population
Increase of 168%
From 2000 to 2050
(In millions) (% of population)
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
10
Working Age and Total Population (Canada)
(in millions)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Total 20-64
Annual increases:
Total 20-64 D 1980-2000 +1.1% +1.4%
D 2000-2020 +0.8% +0.8%
D 2020-2040 +0.5% +0.1%
After 2025, almost all projected population increase will come from migration.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
11
Projected number of years needed to go from 12% to 24%
of 65 and over as a % the total population
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
30 years
40 years
25 years
60 years
65 years
65 years
Global Aging
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
12
Economic Assumptions
• Participation rates
• Employment increase (Job creation rate)
• Unemployment rate
• Inflation rate
• Increase of average employment earnings
• Interest rate and rate of return by asset class
Sources: Historical trends, Recent experience, PEAP from U of T.,
Department of Finance estimates, Conference Board,
Report on Canadian Economic Statistics by CIA, CPPIB,
Watson Wyatt Economic Expectations Survey, CPP seminars
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
13
Participation Rates 15-69 (Canada)
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
1976 1986 1996 2006 2016 2026 2036 2046
Male Female
.
Assumption CPP Report: 73.4% in 2030
20
03
Panel’s views: reasonable
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
14
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021
Annual Increase in Consumer Price Index
Average 71-80: 8.0%
Average 81-90
5.9 %
Average 91-00
2.0 %
Assumption CPP Report
2.0% in 2004-2008 increasing to
2.7% in 2015 +
Average 61-70
2.7 %
Panel’s views: reasonable but they would
have chosen a lower inflation rate.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
15
Annual Increase in Real Wages
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
CPP Report
Conference Board U of T
Assumption CPP Report:
1.2% (2012+)
Avg 1979-2003: 0.0%
Avg 1954-2003: 1.2%
Panel’s views: reasonable but they would
have chosen higher real wages.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
16
Increase of Real Total Earnings
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
2003-2015 2015-2025 2025-2050
Workers Wages
1.7% 1.5% 1.5%
0.8%
1.2% 1.2%
0.9%
0.3% 0.3%
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
17
Working Age Population (ages 20-60)
(indexed 2000=100)
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
Source: UN World Population Prospects
Japan
Spain
Italy
Germany
UK
France
Canada
US
100
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
18
Asset Mix and Real Rate of Return
• Expected asset mix of CPP Investment Board by 2006
65% Variable Income Securities
35% Fixed Income Securities
• Expected asset mix by 2025
55% Variable Income Securities
45% Fixed Income Securities
Average Real Rate of Return: 4.1% (2011+)
Panel’s views: reasonable but they would
have chosen higher real rate of return.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
19
• Increase the contribution rate by 65% over 6 years
(1997-2003) and keep the same rate thereafter
• Moderate the future growth of benefits by 10% on a
long-term basis (in 2050).
• Creation of the CPP Investment Board (www.cppib.ca)
Effect of the 1998
Amendments
CPP Steady-State Funding
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
20
Asset/Expenditure Ratio
9.9% Legislated contribution rate
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075
9.8% Steady-state rate
In 2020, CPP/QPP assets are projected
to be equal to 17% of the GDP.
(Ratio)
CPP Steady-State Funding
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
21
• The current legislated contribution rate is 9.9%.
• The steady-state contribution rate is 9.8%.
• If the legislated contribution rate is higher than
the steady-state rate, the funding status of the
plan will increase over time.
• The higher this rate is set above the steady-
state rate, the faster the plan will become more
funded.
CPP Steady-State Funding
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
22
• If the steady-state rate is higher than the legislated contribution rate AND if finance ministers cannot reach agreement on a solution, then:
– Contribution rate increased by ½ of excess over three years, subject to maximum increase of 0.2% per year
– Benefits frozen
– At end of three years, next review performed to determine financial status of Plan.
CPP Steady-State Funding
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
23
Strengthening the Accountability
• Federal and provincial governments took
meaningful steps to strengthen the
transparency and accountability of actuarial
reporting. They endorsed :
– an increase in the frequency of actuarial reporting from
every five years to every three years.
– regular consultations by the Chief Actuary with experts
on assumptions to be used in actuarial reports;
– regular peer reviews of future actuarial reports on the
CPP.
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
24
2005 Peer Review
–Auditor General and Selection Process
of Independent Panel
–Overseeing of the Peer Review by GAD
–Terms of Reference
Peer Review Process
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
25
• The panel found that each of the major
assumptions is reasonable.
• In their view,
– five of the nine major assumptions are near the
centre of the reasonable range, and
– four assumptions are lower or higher within
the range than what they would have chosen.
Peer Review Report
Office of the Chief Actuary Bureau de l’actuaire en chef
26
• The independent peer review report confirms:
– actuarial work complies with the relevant professional
standards of practice;
– Statutory requirements are met;
– chief actuary had access to the data required;
– data are sufficient and reliable;
– assumptions are, in the aggregate, reasonable;
– the report fairly communicates the result;
• and resulted in twelve recommendations. April 2005
Peer Review Report