Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on...

19
Campus Retention Workgroup A quick overview

Transcript of Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on...

Page 1: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

Campus Retention Workgroup A quick overview

Page 2: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

Political •Federal scrutiny on retention

and time to degree. •State scrutiny, including an

abandoned proposal from governor tied funding to graduation rates.

•Retention and 4-year graduation are on President Napolitano’s radar, too.

Financial •Dropouts cost California

nearly a half billion dollars per year.

•Huge savings if we really make 4 years the norm.

•Huge savings to students, too, as national education debt reaches new highs.

Social Justice •Persistent differences in

outcomes perpetuate social inequities

Why Does Retention Matter?

Page 3: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

95% Year 1

90% Year 2

But… We lose upper-division students

Our 1st & 2nd year retention are great. How can we have a problem?

Page 4: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

4-year6-year

UC San Diego graduation rates don’t fare well in comparison with our peers

We’re 4th overall, and 5th for 4-year rates!

Page 5: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

∗ Multi-strategy approach ∗ Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗ Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc

committee 2008-10) ∗ Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗ Examining current UC San Diego student data ∗ Researching promising practices at peer institutions

Focusing on student retention

Page 6: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

6 Graduation Rates of African American and

Mexican American Students are Below the Mean 92

% 95%

91% 96

%

91%

88% 94

%

94%

94%

94%

92%

92%

88% 90

%

91%

86% 89

% 91%

91%

91%

73%

89%

77%

84%

84% 86

%

84%

83% 88

%

86%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

African Am. Asian Mexican Am. Filipino Latino Native Am. Caucasian First Generation

Not First Generation

Ethnicity First Generation College Status

Total Population

UCSD Retention and Graduation Rates, First-Time Freshman Cohort

1-Year Retention (2011 Cohort) 2-Year Retention (2010 Cohort) 6-Year Graduation (2006 Cohort)

Page 7: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

Questions posed to Focus Group Participants:

• What were at least three challenges or barriers you faced during your first and second years?

• What proportion of students like you do you think experience these barriers or challenges?

• What knowledge or strategies do students need to overcome the challenges and barriers you identified?

• What changes can UC San Diego make to help students overcome the challenges and barriers you identified?

• What is currently working at UC San Diego to help students like you overcome the challenges and barriers you identified?

So we put together a focus group to learn about our students

Page 8: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

The planning and execution of the study involved people from across campus.

Planning Committee:

∗ Bill Armstrong, Student Research & Information ∗ Cynthia Davalos, VCSA ∗ Doug Easterly, Muir College ∗ Kathleen Johnson, Academic Affairs ∗ Makeba Jones, Education Studies ∗ Reina Juarez, Counseling & Psychological Services ∗ Emily Marx, Center for Student Involvement ∗ Gennie Miranda, Jacobs School of Engineering ∗ Gary Ratcliff, Student Life ∗ Sonia Rosado, Muir College ∗ Penny Rue, VCSA ∗ Edwina Welch, Cross Cultural Center

Facilitators

∗ Frida Alvear, SPACES ∗ Timothy Borch, Admissions ∗ Haydee Cervantes, Chicano/a Arts & Humanities ∗ Veronica Henson-Phillips, Office of Graduate Studies ∗ Mentha Hynes Wilson, Marshall College ∗ Anthony P. Jakubisin, Sixth College ∗ Reina Juarez, Counseling & Psychological Services ∗ Alejandra Sotelo-Solis, Center for Student Involvement ∗ Kelly O’Sullivan, International Center ∗ Agustin Orozco , OASIS ∗ Patrick Velasquez, OASIS ∗ Laci Weeden, Parent & Family Programs

Page 9: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

9

Findings: Six Common Challenges Identified by Students

Diversity &

Campus Climate Isolation on

Campus Psychosocial Wellbeing

Family & Home Academics Financial

Page 10: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

10

Family & Home Challenges

Family Pressures: Major expectations, getting married, pressure to come home for family events/ emergencies, fear of family members being deported

First Generation: Explaining college to family, lacking guidance on course of study for career, lack of support of those who’ve gone before you

Home Sickness

Feeling out of place when returning home

Page 11: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

11

Financial Challenges

Having to Work: finding a job, having trouble accessing campus resources because you have to work

Mastering time management

Lack of financial stability

Worry about student loan debt

Page 12: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

12

Diversity & Campus Climate Challenges

Culture Clash: Living with different roommate with different backgrounds, different economic backgrounds adjustments, different than majority culture

Institutional Perception of Minority Status: University not believing in me and my capabilities

Lack of Critical Mass: Faculty, students, Teaching Assistants, general role models not apparent

Page 13: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

13

Psychosocial Wellbeing Challenges Isolation Challenges

Social: Not seeing familiar faces, Finding people who relate to your situation (first generation)

Feeling Alone/ Belonging: Tokenism in the classroom and dorms, Lack of ethnic or racial housing themes, Unfriendly culture

Asking for Help: Learning how to ask for help, feeling overwhelmed

Isolation Off-Campus: Hard to find a place to live where you feel safe, Can’t relate to UTC/La Jolla community

Validation: Don’t belong here, Not feeling valued or taken care of, I don’t matter

Intersectionality: Compounding identities – Race, Sexual identity, Economic class

Anger and Frustration: Overcoming anger, Feeling frustrated at the system/ bureaucracy

Page 14: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

14

Academics Challenges

Studying: Knowing how to study, how to find study groups, starting with bad academic habits

Professors/ TAs: Few faculty mentors of color, not being able to relate with you

Academic Rigor: Lack of help with transition from lower division to upper division, lack of prior academic prep, quarter system too fast

Classroom Dynamic: Competition within the classroom, huge class size, grading curves

Support: Don’t know who to ask for help, academic advisors not approachable, Lack of peer support

Page 15: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

15

Themes in a similar qualitative study

Student

Engagement

Meaningful Connections with Faculty

Peer Support

Accountability

and Drive to Succeed

Palmer, R.T., Maramba, D.C., and Holmes. S.L. (2011). A contemporary examination of factors promoting the academic success of minority students at a predominantly white university. Journal of College Student Retention. 13(3) 329-349.

Page 16: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

16 A

CTIO

N S

TRAT

EGIE

S FR

MA

KEW

ORK

Div

ersi

ty &

Cam

pus

Advice for Students

from Students What Students Ask of Instructors

What Students Ask of UC San Diego

What Students Say Works

• Find comfortable spaces

• Join SPACES

• Show appreciation so that you stay here

• Greater diversity representation in students, faculty, & staff

• Increased outreach • Recruit more

diverse population • Admit more

students of color (specifically AA)

• Community centers

• Get involved in organized activities

• Involvement of faculty of same background

• BSU Overnight

• Join multi-cultural organizations

• Encourage validation from department

• More activities that promote diversity

• Cross-cultural experiences

• More cultural awareness weeks

• Cultural organizations

• MECHA • SAAC

Page 17: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

∗ Identifying challenges ∗ Beginning a dialogue ∗ Identifying partners empowered to make changes

∗ Faculty ∗ Advisors ∗ Student Affairs Staff

∗ Testing out and evaluating new support efforts ∗ Teaching changes ∗ Policy changes ∗ Service changes

Moving from research to actions & strategies

Page 18: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

Later Research w/Faculty

Study Abroad

Service Learning Internships Senior

Experience

First-Year

Learning Communities Service Learning Faculty Engagement

We know that high-impact practices can improve retention & achievement (Kuh, 2008)

Page 19: Campus Retention Workgroup · ∗Campus-wide Retention Summit, 2011 ∗Standing Committee on Retention, 2011 (Ad hoc committee 2008 -10) ∗Focus Group Project, 2012 ∗Examining

∗ Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M.M., & McPherson, M.S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.

∗ Gonzalez, K.P. (2009). Using data to increase student success: A focus on diagnosis. Achieving the Dream. Silver Spring, MD.

∗ Kuh, G.D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Washington, D.C.

∗ Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 51-89). Springer Netherlands.

References