CalVTP Implementation Training
Transcript of CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Implementation TrainingHow to Use the CalVTP Program EIR for CEQA Streamlining
Presented by:
Board of Forestry and Fire ProtectionAscent Environmental, Inc.
Zoom Webinar – Technical Tips
Participants’ audio, video, hand raising, and chat are automatically off.Participants control the layout of the slides and the panelists video. If something is in the way, move it or resize it. The slide show may display best in full screen.Questions can be submitted in the Q&A box at any time. There will be breaks for Q&A between topics.
This webinar is being recorded and will be made available.2CalVTP Implementation Training
Instructors
Ascent Environmental, Principal
Curtis E. Alling, AICP
Ascent Environmental,Senior Project Manager
Heather Blair
Ascent Environmental,Senior Environmental Planner
Lily Bostrom
Ascent Environmental,Senior Biologist
Lara Rachowicz, PhD
3CalVTP Implementation Training
Board of Forestry and Fire Protection,
Executive Officer
Matt Dias
CalVTP Training Course Content
Part 1: Overview of the CalVTP Program EIR• Treatment types and activities• Treatable landscape• Eligible project proponents
Part 2: Preparing a CEQA Document Using the CalVTP Program EIR • CEQA Fundamentals – Program EIRs• Project-Specific Analysis• Project-Specific Analysis/Addendum• Focused ND, MND, EIR Using the CalVTP PEIR
Part 3: Decision Documentation and Approval Process• Decision Documentation and Approval Process • MMRP Implementation
Wrap Up: CalVTP Training Resources4CalVTP Implementation Training
Part 1Overview of the CalVTP Program EIR
CalVTP Program EIR - Overview
Board of Forestry and Fire Protection certified the CalVTP Program EIR in December 2019
Designed to help public agencies expedite implementation of treatments consistent with the CalVTP to reduce wildfire risks and avoid or diminish the harmful effects of wildfire on the people, property, and natural resources of California
6CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Objectives
Serve as the vegetation management component of the state’s strategy to reduce risks to life, property, and natural resources, consistent with state priorities• California’s Wildfire and Forest Resilience Action Plan• California’s 2018 Strategic Fire Plan• $1 billion in 2021/2022 proposed budget for wildfire and forest resilience
Substantially increase the pace and scale of vegetation treatments, consistent with the Shared Stewardship Agreement and Executive Order B-52-18;Improve resiliency in fire-adapted habitats by safely mimicking the effects of a natural fire regime.
7CalVTP Implementation Training
Frequently Used Acronyms
CalVTP – California Vegetation Treatment ProgramPEIR – Program Environmental Impact ReportSPR – Standard Project Requirement• e.g., Administrative SPRs: SPR-AD-7
MM – Mitigation Measure MMRP – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting ProgramPSA – Project-Specific AnalysisSRA – State Responsibility AreaLRA – Local Responsibility Area
CalVTP Implementation Training 8
CalVTP Program Area
Treatments would occur within the“Treatable Landscape” of the StateResponsibility Area
Defined as the portion of the SRA withvegetation conditions suitable for treatments
20.3 million acres total
Tree, shrub, grass fuel types
Treatable landscape viewer available online• https://bofdata.fire.ca.gov/projects-and-programs/calvtp/
9CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Program Description
Covered Treatment Types:Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) fuel reduction - focused in WUI-designated areas and generally consist of treatments to reduce fuel loads and slow or prevent the spread of fire between wildlands and structures, and vice versa; Fuel breaks - are strategically placed vegetation treatment areas that actively support fire-control activities; andEcological restoration projects - generally occur outside the WUI in areas that have departed from the natural fire regime as a result of fire exclusion, and would focus on restoring ecosystem processes, conditions, and resiliency.
10CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Program Description
Covered Treatment Activities:
Prescribed burning
Manual vegetation treatment
Mechanical vegetation treatment
Prescribed herbivory (targeted grazing)
Targeted ground application of herbicides
11CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Program Description
Environmentally Protective Standard Project Requirements (SPRs):
Environmentally protective requirements to avoid or minimize impacts and emphasize effective compliance with applicable laws and regulations
Incorporated into later vegetation treatments consistent the CalVTP as a standard part of treatment design and implementation
Formulated through interagency coordination with• California Department of Fish and Wildlife,• California Coastal Commission, • California Air Resources Board, and • State Water Resources Control Board
requires a CDP by the Coastal Commission or a local government with a certified LCP
12CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Program EIR – Designed for StreamliningResponsible Agencies
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
• Incidental Take Authorizations
• Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements
Regional Water Quality Control Boards
• Waste Discharge Requirements and Conditional Waivers
California Coastal Commission
• Coastal Development Permit
13CalVTP Implementation Training
Activities/Areas Outside the Scope of the CalVTP PEIR
Activities within Federal Responsibility Area and Local Responsibility Area• SRA Treatable Landscape needs to be a substantial part of the project, but LRA or
FRA and potentially tribal land can be added
• An Addendum or Supplement to the CalVTP Program EIR can still streamline!
Implementation of defensible space programs and building code creation/enforcement
Removal of trees for commercial purposes (timber harvesting)
• Subject to Forest Practice Act
14CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTP Program EIR – Designed for Streamlining Project Proponents
CalVTP PEIR designed for use by state, regional, special district, and local agencies with land management or funding responsibilities.• “Project Proponent”: state or local public agency providing funding for vegetation
treatment or with land ownership and/or management, or other regulatory responsibilities in the treatable landscape
• Possible project proponents include
• Also applicable to projects on private land, if they receive state or local government grants for vegetation treatment
– CAL FIRE– Cities – Special Districts
– Counties– Water Agencies– Open Space Districts
– Universities– Conservancies– other public agencies…
15CalVTP Implementation Training
Part 2
Preparing a CEQA DocumentUsing the CalVTP Program EIR
CEQA Fundamentals: Program EIRs
Program EIRs (CEQA Guidelines § 15168)
Program EIRs can be used for a series of actions characterized as one large project that are related geographically, as logical parts of a chain of actions, or individual activities that have similar environmental effects that can be mitigated in similar ways.Advantages:• Streamlining can be accomplished by finding later activities to be “within the scope.” If so, no
additional CEQA document need be prepared or circulated to the public.• Comprehensive consideration of cumulative impacts (CEQA Guidelines §15168(b)(2))• Within-the-scope finding is protected by substantial evidence standard.• Even if a later activity is not within the scope, the PEIR can be used to focus the subsequent or
supplemental CEQA document on new or substantially more severe significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines §§15162 and 15163).
18CalVTP Implementation Training
Program EIRs: Use with Later Activities
How to determine whether it is “within the scope”?• Factual question Lead Agency determines based on substantial evidence• Considerations (CEQA Guidelines § 15168(c)(2)): geographic area, proposed activity
intensityAll feasible mitigation shall be incorporatedThe Lead Agency shall use a written checklist to document the “within-the-scope” evaluation (CEQA Guidelines §15168(c)(4))CEQA Guidelines §15168(c)(5) contemplates that “many later activities” could be “within the scope”
reinforced by Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife (3rd Dist. 2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 214
19CalVTP Implementation Training
Tailored Checklist for Later Activities
Tailored checklists (e.g., CalVTP PSA) are used to document coverage by a PEIR
For new impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts, a subsequent ND, MND, or EIR is required (CEQA Guidelines § 15162)
• An Addendum may be used to analyze treatment areas extending outside the SRA but with similar environmental conditions.
20CalVTP Implementation Training
21
CEQA Flow Chart for CalVTP PSAs
CalVTP Implementation Training
Comparison of CEQA Documents
Within the Scope Findings (i.e., PSAs) = time and cost savings
22
Average Size/Length Public Review Requirements Overall Timeline
to CompleteStandard of
Review
EIR 300-1000+ 30-day review period for the NOP30-45 day review period for draft EIR 12-18 months Substantial
evidence
IS/NDIS/MND 70-120 pages 20-30 day review period for
proposed ND/MND 6-8 months Fair argument
PSAPSA/Addendum 30-80 pages None required 2-4 months Substantial
evidence
CalVTP Implementation Training
QUESTIONS?
Project-Specific Analysis
25
SPR AD-7 reporting requirements• Planned, approved, completed projects
Planned projects• GIS data that include project location
(as a point)• project size (typically acres)• treatment types and activities• contact information for a representative
of the project proponent
Purpose = provide info to the public
CalVTP Implementation Database
CalVTP Implementation Training
CalVTPImplementation
Database– Planned Projects
26CalVTP Implementation Training
Project-Specific Analysis (PSA) – Project Description
Prepare Vegetation Treatment Project Information• Treatment types• Treatment activities• Acreage(s)• Fuel type(s)• Treatment maintenance
Describe equipment to be used, planned activity duration, other info to provide evidence for within the scope considerations May use other formats
27CalVTP Implementation Training
ExampleProject-Specific Analysis (PSA)
Example: Bear Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve Vegetation Treatment Project PSAProject Proponent: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
28CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Vegetation Treatment Project
214 acres proposed for initial treatment, all within the CalVTP treatable landscapeCalVTP treatment type proposed: ecological restorationCalVTP treatment activities proposed: manual and mechanical treatment Treatment maintenance:• Retreatment every 5 to 10 years
• Manual and mechanical treatment methods
29CalVTP Implementation Training
QUESTIONS?
PSA Preparation: Environmental Checklist
31
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Location of Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment
Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project:
Impact AES-1: Result in Short-Term, Substantial Degradation of a Scenic Vista or Visual Character or Quality of Public Views, or Damage to Scenic Resources in a State Scenic Highway from Treatment Activities
LTS Impact AES-1,pages
3.2-16 – 3.2-19
Yes AES-2 NA LTS No Yes
Impact AES-2: Result in Long-Term, Substantial Degradation of a Scenic Vista or Visual Character or Quality of Public Views, or Damage to Scenic Resources in a State Scenic Highway from Wildland Urban Interface Fuel Reduction, Ecological Restoration, or Shaded Fuel Break Treatment Types
LTS Impact AES-2,pages
3.2-20 – 3.2-25
Yes AES-1AES-3
NA LTS No Yes
Impact AES-3: Result in Long-Term Substantial Degradation of a Scenic Vista or Visual Character or Quality of Public Views, or Damage to Scenic Resources in a State Scenic Highway from the Nonshaded Fuel Break Treatment Type
SU Impact AES-3,pages
3.2-25 – 3.2-27
No — — — — —
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact. CalVTP Implementation Training
PSA Preparation: Impact Discussion
Impact discussions follow the Environmental ChecklistImpact determinations required by CEQA• Need to determine whether criteria for preparation of subsequent CEQA docs apply
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a))– No new or substantially more severe significant effects
• Must be supported by substantial evidence:– Include analytical discussions for conclusions
– Identify portions of the PEIR relied upon
– Attach project-specific site surveys or other information relied upon to the PSA
– Include all references
32CalVTP Implementation Training
PSA Preparation: Impact Discussion Continued
Impact discussions are required for each CalVTP impactFor CalVTP impacts that are applicable to your project, the discussion should include:• Description of the impact of the proposed treatment project
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR
• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR
• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project– Identify those that apply but are not feasible (explain infeasibility)
– Explain how SPRs and MMs will be tailored to the treatment project, as applicable
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR
33CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Air Quality Impact AQ-1 Discussion
Impact AQ-1: Generate emissions of air pollutants and precursors during treatment activities that would exceed CAAQS or NAAQS
• Description of the impact of the proposed treatment project:
– “Use of vehicles and equipment during vegetation treatments would result in emissions of criteria pollutants that could exceed CAAQS or NAAQS thresholds.”
34CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Air Quality Impact AQ-1 Discussion
Impact AQ-1: Generate emissions of air pollutants and precursors during treatment activities that would exceed CAAQS or NAAQS
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR:
– “The potential for emissions of criteria pollutants to exceed CAAQS or NAAQS thresholds was examined in the PEIR.”
– The checklist identifies the PEIR page numbers where this impact is analyzed
35CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Air Quality Impact AQ-1 Discussion
Impact AQ-1: Generate emissions of air pollutants and precursors during treatment activities that would exceed CAAQS or NAAQS
• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR:
– “Emissions of criteria air pollutants as a result of vehicle and equipment use under the proposed project would be potentially significant and are within the scope of the PEIR because the size of crews, the types of equipment, and the duration of equipment use would be consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR.”
– Crew size, equipment type, duration of equipment use is presented in the project description
– These are the factors considered by the lead agency in making its within the scope determination per CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2))
36CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Air Quality Impact AQ-1 Discussion
Impact AQ-1: Generate emissions of air pollutants and precursors during treatment activities that would exceed CAAQS or NAAQS
• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project:
– “SPRs applicable to the proposed project are AQ-1 and AQ-4”
– “CalVTP Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would be infeasible for the project proponent to implement because the treatments would be implemented by a special district with variable funding. It would be cost prohibitive to use equipment meeting the latest efficiency standards, including meeting the U.S. EPA’s Tier 4 emission standards, using renewable diesel fuel, using electric- and gasoline-powered equipment, and using equipment with Best Available Control Technology. In addition, carpooling may not be feasible or recommended during an active COVID-19 outbreak”
37CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Air Quality Impact AQ-1 Discussion
Impact AQ-1: Generate emissions of air pollutants and precursors during treatment activities that would exceed CAAQS or NAAQS
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR:
– “Therefore, this impact would remain unavoidable and potentially significant for the same reasons explained in the PEIR, but for the reasons explained above, would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact”
– Significant and unavoidable in both the CalVTP Program EIR and PSA
– Modeling emissions can be used to show a less severe project impact
38CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Completed Checklist Impact AQ-1
39
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Locationof Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project:
Impact AQ-1: Generate Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants and Precursors During Treatment Activities that would exceed CAAQS or NAAQS
SU Impact AQ-1,pages
3.4-26 – 3.4-32Appendix AQ-1
Yes AQ-1AQ-4
AQ-1 SU No Yes
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact.
CalVTP Implementation Training
Air Quality - Other Considerations
Additional requirements for prescribed burning (SPR AQ-2, AQ-3, AQ-6)
• Prepare and submit a Smoke Management Plan to Air District (example SMP provided in Appendix PD-2 to the CalVTP PEIR)
• Create a Burn Plan
• Follow CAL FIRE safety procedures, implement an approved Incident Action Plan
• Coordinate with the applicable air district to determine specific requirements
40CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Archaeological, Historical, and Tribal Cultural Resources Section
Cultural SPRs require action to complete the PSA• SPR CUL-1: Conduct cultural records search
• SPR CUL-2: Contact NAHC for tribal contact list and Sacred Lands File search– Notify tribes in the counties where the treatment is located
– This is *NOT* AB 52 consultation
Additional Cultural SPRs required for ground disturbing treatments and Rx burning:• SPR CUL-3: Pre-field research
• SPR CUL-4: Archaeological surveys
• SPR CUL-8: Cultural resource training
41CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Cultural Resources Impact CUL-2 Discussion
Impact CUL-2: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique archaeological resources or subsurface historical resources
• Description of the impact of the proposed treatment project:
– “Vegetation treatment activities would include mechanical treatments that use heavy equipment that could result in ground disturbance as vegetation is removed; this could result in damage to known or unknown archaeological resources if present within a treatment area”
42CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Cultural Resources Impact CUL-2 Discussion
Impact CUL-2: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique archaeological resources or subsurface historical resources
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR:
– “The potential for these treatment activities to result in disturbance to, damage to, or destruction of archaeological resources was examined in the PEIR”
– The checklist identifies the PEIR page numbers where this impact is analyzed
43CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Cultural Resources Impact CUL-2 Discussion
Impact CUL-2: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique archaeological resources or subsurface historical resources
• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR:
– “This impact is within the scope of the PEIR, because the treatment activities and the intensity of ground disturbance that would occur under the proposed project are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR”
– Treatment activities and treatment intensity are presented in the project description
– These are the factors considered by the lead agency in making its within the scope determination per CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2))
44CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Cultural Resources Impact CUL-2 Discussion
Impact CUL-2: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique archaeological resources or subsurface historical resources
• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project
– “SPRs applicable to this impact are CUL-5 through CUL-8”
– “Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would also apply to this treatment to protect any inadvertent discoveries of archaeological resources”
45CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Cultural Resources Impact CUL-2 Discussion
Impact CUL-2: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of unique archaeological resources or subsurface historical resources
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR
– “This impact of the proposed project is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR”
– The CalVTP conclusion is SU and the project’s impact is LTSM
46CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Completed Checklist Impact CUL-2
47
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Locationof Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project:
Impact CUL-2: Cause a Substantial Adverse Change inthe Significance of Unique Archaeological Resources or Subsurface Historical Resources
SU Impact CUL-2,pages
3.5-15 – 3.5-16
Yes CUL-5CUL-6CUL-7CUL-8
CUL-2 LTSM No Yes
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact.
CalVTP Implementation Training
Cultural Resources – Other Considerations
Grouse Ridge Vegetation Treatment Project PSA/Addendum
• Received a tribal response (per SPR CUL-2)
• As a result, SPR CUL-6 (Treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources) expanded to include project-specific implementation guidance
– Specific measures developed in consultation with the tribe to protect TCRs
– Project-specific implementation guidance is included in the project’s MMRP
48CalVTP Implementation Training
QUESTIONS?
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Materials Sites
• CalVTP concluded less than significant with mitigation (Mitigation Measure HAZ-3)
– Coordinate with landowner regarding known hazardous waste sites
– Database search and review of Cortese List
– Known sites marked, no soil disturbing treatments or prescribed burning within 100 feet
• Historic hazardous waste site was known to Midpen, none on Cortese List. Per MM HAZ-3, Midpen would flag and avoid.
50CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Materials Sites
• Description of the impact of the proposed treatment project:
– “Vegetation treatments would include soil disturbance through mechanical treatment activities, which could expose workers or the environment to hazardous materials if a contaminated site is present within a treatment area”
51CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Materials Sites
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR:
– “The potential for treatment activities to encounter contamination that could expose workers or the environment to hazardous materials was examined in the PEIR. This impact was identified as potentially significant in the PEIR because of the large geographic extent of the treatable landscape, hazardous materials sites could be present within treatment sites, and soil disturbance in those areas could expose people or the environment to hazards”
52CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Materials Sites• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR:
– “As directed by Mitigation Measure HAZ-3, a database search and review of the Cortese List for hazardous materials sites within the Preserve have been conducted. There are no active Cortese List hazardous materials sites within or adjacent to the Preserve”
– “…a historic-era dump site/landfill is located in the northeastern portion of the Preserve, adjacent to the former Alma College “village.” Concentrations of lead, zinc, and copper were found in excess of hazardous waste toxicity criteria, but due to the use of the site as open space, removal was not recommended (Geocon Consultants 2019; Albion Environmental 2019). The dump site is located in close proximity to an area of proposed habitat improvement treatments and an area of proposed SOD treatments. Consistent with the requirements of Mitigation Measure HAZ-3, the landfill area will be marked/flagged, and no soil-disturbing treatment activities will occur within 100 feet of the site boundaries”
53CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Materials Sites
• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project:
– Mitigation Measure HAZ-3 only
54CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Materials Sites
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR:
– “This impact of the proposed project is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR”
– LTSM for both the CalVTP Program EIR and PSA
55CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Completed Checklist Impact HAZ-3
56
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Locationof Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project:
Impact HAZ-3: Expose the Public or Environment to Significant Hazards from Disturbance to Known Hazardous Material Sites
PS Impact HAZ-3,pages
3.10-18 – 3.10-19
Yes NA HAZ-3 LTSM No Yes
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact.
CalVTP Implementation Training
Hazards and Hazardous Materials – Other Considerations
Specific herbicides were analyzed in the CalVTP PEIR • 11 different herbicides:
– Borax – Imazapyr – Sulfometuron Methyl– Clopyralid – Triclopyr – Indaziflam– Glyphosate – Cleantraxx – Nonylphenol 9 Ethoxylates– Hexazinone – Velpar
Use of those specific compounds are covered by the PEIR and analyzed in CalVTP Risk Assessment (see Appendices HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 in PEIR Volume 2)SPRs apply to herbicide useIf other herbicides are proposed, additional CEQA and compound-specific risk assessment may be required
57CalVTP Implementation Training
5 MINUTESBREAK
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hydrology/Water Quality Impact HYD-2
Impact HYD-2: Violate Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements, Substantially Degrade Surface or Groundwater Quality, or Conflict with or Obstruct the Implementation of a Water Quality Control Plan Through Manual and Mechanical Treatment Activities
• Description of the impact of the proposed treatment project:
– “Vegetation treatments would include manual and mechanical treatment activities. These treatment activities would disturb soils and require the use of fuels, which have the potential to enter waterways and degrade water quality ”
59CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hydrology/Water Quality Impact HYD-2
Impact HYD-2: Violate Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements, Substantially Degrade Surface or Groundwater Quality, or Conflict with or Obstruct the Implementation of a Water Quality Control Plan Through Manual and Mechanical Treatment Activities
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR:
– “The potential for mechanical and manual treatment activities to violate water quality regulations or degrade water quality was examined in the PEIR”
60CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hydrology/Water Quality Impact HYD-2
Impact HYD-2: Violate Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements, Substantially Degrade Surface or Groundwater Quality, or Conflict with or Obstruct the Implementation of a Water Quality Control Plan Through Manual and Mechanical Treatment Activities
• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR:
– “This impact is within the scope of the PEIR because the types and locations of treatment activities and use of heavy equipment and hand-held tools to remove vegetation are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR”
61CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hydrology/Water Quality Impact HYD-2
Impact HYD-2: Violate Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements, Substantially Degrade Surface or Groundwater Quality, or Conflict with or Obstruct the Implementation of a Water Quality Control Plan Through Manual and Mechanical Treatment Activities
• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project:
– “SPRs applicable to this treatment are HYD-1, HYD-2, HYD-4, HYD-6, GEO-1 through GEO-4, GEO-7, GEO-8, and HAZ-1”
62CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Hydrology/Water Quality Impact HYD-2
Impact HYD-2: Violate Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements, Substantially Degrade Surface or Groundwater Quality, or Conflict with or Obstruct the Implementation of a Water Quality Control Plan Through Manual and Mechanical Treatment Activities
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR:
– “This impact of the proposed project is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR”
63CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Completed Checklist Impact HYD-2
64
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Locationof Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment
Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project: Completed Checklist Impact HYD-2
Impact HYD-2: Violate Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements, Substantially Degrade Surface or Ground Water Quality, or Conflict with or Obstruct the Implementation of a Water Quality Control Plan Through the Implementation of Manual or Mechanical Treatment Activities
LTS Impact HYD-2,pages
3.11-27 – 3.11-29
Yes HYD-1HYD-2HYD-4HYD-6GEO-1 GEO-2GEO-3GEO-4 GEO-7GEO-8HAZ-1
NA LTS No Yes
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact.
CalVTP Implementation Training
Other Considerations for Hydrology and Water Quality
SPR HYD-1: Comply with Water Quality Regulations • Project proponents must conduct proposed vegetation treatments in conformance with
appropriate RWQCB timber, vegetation and land disturbance related Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) and/or related Conditional Waivers of Waste Discharge Requirements (Waivers), and appropriate Basin Plan Prohibitions. Where these regulatory requirements differ, the most restrictive apply
• The current applicable WDRs and Waivers for timber and vegetation management activities are included in Appendix HYD-1 to the CalVTP PEIR
• Update: SWRCB Proposed General Order– General waste discharge requirements for vegetation treatment activities under the CalVTP
– Aimed at streamlining permitting requirements
65CalVTP Implementation Training
66
Biological Resources – OverviewData Collection and Mitigation Strategy
Data Review & Recon Survey
SPR BIO-1
If treatment in suitable habitatFocused or Protocol Surveys
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
If species, resources present Avoid Loss, Maintain Habitat Function Or Compensate
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
CalVTP Implementation Training
67
Project-Specific Data Review• CalVTP PEIR ecoregion tables
• Databases, literature review
Reconnaissance Survey• Assess habitat suitability for special-
status species
• Identify sensitive resources
Create special-status species tableAvoid suitable habitat/resources or conduct additional surveys
SPR BIO-1: Data Review and Reconnaissance Survey
Data Review & Recon Survey
SPR Bio-1
If treatment in suitable habitatFocused or Protocol Surveys
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
If species, resources presentAvoid Loss, Maintain Habitat
Function Or Compensate
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
CalVTP Implementation Training
68
Plants and wildlife• Special-status plants
(SPR BIO-7)• Special-status wildlife and nursery sites
(SPR BIO-10)• Common nesting birds
(SPR BIO-12)
Sensitive resources• Sensitive natural communities
(SPR BIO-3)• Identify ESHA in Coastal Zone
(SPR BIO-8)• Delineate wetlands
(MM BIO-4)
Focused or Protocol-Level SurveysData Review & Recon Survey
SPR Bio-1
If treatment in suitable habitatFocused or Protocol Surveys
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
If species, resources presentAvoid Loss, Maintain Habitat
Function Or Compensate
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
CalVTP Implementation Training
69
Avoid loss of sensitive speciesand resources (SPRs, MitigationMeasures)• Physical or seasonal avoidance
• Agency consultation
• Provide documentation forcertain exceptions– If treatment would benefit species overall
but individuals may be affected
– If it is infeasible to avoid loss of commonbird nests (not including raptors)
Avoid Loss, Maintain Habitat Function, or Compensate
Data Review & Recon Survey
SPR Bio-1
If treatment in suitable habitatFocused or Protocol Surveys
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
If species, resources presentAvoid Loss, Maintain Habitat
Function Or Compensate
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
CalVTP Implementation Training
70
Maintain habitat function (SPRs,Mitigation Measures)• Retain habitat features (e.g., high canopy
closure, tree snags, coarse woody debris),replicate the natural fire regime of community
• Determine if habitat function will remain forlisted or fully protected species
• Agency consultation (listed/fully protected species)• Provide documentation for certain exceptions
– If treatment would benefit sensitive habitats overallbut some loss may occur
Compensation, if significant effects remain(Mitigation Measures)
Avoid Loss, Maintain Habitat Function, or Compensate
Data Review & Recon Survey
SPR Bio-1
If treatment in suitable habitatFocused or Protocol Surveys
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
If species, resources presentAvoid Loss, Maintain Habitat
Function Or Compensate
SPRs, Mitigation Measures
CalVTP Implementation Training
CDFW Contactsfor CalVTP
Consultation
CalVTP Implementation Training 71
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-1 Discussion
Impact BIO-1: Substantially Affect Special-Status Plant Species Either Directly orThrough Habitat Modifications• Data review and reconnaissance survey (SPR BIO-1)
– Central California Coast ecoregion
– Special-status plant table
• Description of the impact of the proposedtreatment project:– “Initial vegetation treatments and maintenance
treatments could result in direct or indirect adverseeffects on the 23 special-status plant species withsuitable habitat in treatment areas.”
72CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-1 Discussion
Impact BIO-1: Substantially Affect Special-Status Plant Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR:
– “The potential for treatment activities, including maintenance treatments, to result in adverse effects on special-status plants was examined in the PEIR.”
– The checklist identifies the PEIR page numbers where this impact is analyzed
73CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-1 Discussion
Impact BIO-1: Substantially Affect Special-Status Plant Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR:
– “This impact on special-status plants is within the scope of the PEIR because the affected special-status plant species were covered in the PEIR, and the treatment activities and intensity of disturbance as a result of implementing treatment activities are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR.”
– Treatment activities and intensity of disturbance are presented in the project description
74CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-1 Discussion
Impact BIO-1: Substantially Affect Special-Status Plant Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project
– “SPRs applicable to this impact are BIO-1, BIO-2, BIO-6, BIO-9, BIO-10, GEO-1, GEO-3, GEO-4, GEO-5, GEO-7, and HYD-4.”
– “Per Mitigation Measures BIO-1a and BIO-1b, if special-status plants are identified during protocol-level surveys, a no-disturbance buffer of at least 50 feet would be established around the area occupied by the species within which treatment would not occur unless Midpen determines that the species would benefit from treatment in the occupied habitat area.”
– Midpen determined that Hickman’s popcornflower would benefit from treatment and therefore, compensatory mitigation would not be required
75CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-1 Discussion
Impact BIO-1: Substantially Affect Special-Status Plant Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR
– “This impact of the proposed project is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR.”
76CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-1 Checklist
77
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Locationof Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment
Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project:
Impact BIO-1: Substantially Affect Special-Status Plant Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
LTSM Impact BIO-1,pages
3.6-131 – 3.6-138
Yes BIO-1BIO-2BIO-6BIO-7BIO-9GEO-1GEO-3GEO-4GEO-5GEO-7HYD-4
BIO-1aBIO-1b
LTSM No Yes
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact. None: there are SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact, but none are applicable to the treatment project.
CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-2 Discussion
Impact BIO-2: Substantially Affect Special-Status Wildlife Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications• Data review and reconnaissance survey (SPR BIO-1)
– Central California Coast ecoregion
– Special-status wildlife table
• Description of the impact of the proposed treatment project:– “Initial vegetation treatments and maintenance treatments could result in direct or indirect
adverse effects on special-status wildlife species with suitable habitat within a treatment area.”
– Impact discussion subdivided by species or species groups (e.g., foothill yellow-legged frog, special-status birds, special-status bats, mountain lion)
78CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-2 Discussion
Impact BIO-2: Substantially Affect Special-Status Wildlife Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• Summary of the impact in the CalVTP PEIR:
– “The potential for treatment activities, includingmaintenance treatments, to result in adverse effectson special-status wildlife was examined in the PEIR.”
– The checklist identifies the PEIR page numberswhere this impact is analyzed
79
PEIR Life History Categories Tree or Cavity Nesting Shrub Nesting Ground Nesting Burrowing or Denning Insects and Other Terrestrial
Invertebrates Bats Ungulates Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates Amphibians and Reptiles
CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-2 Discussion
Impact BIO-2: Substantially Affect Special-Status Wildlife Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• Evidence the project impact is addressed by the PEIR:
– “This impact on special-status wildlife is within the scope of the PEIR because the affected special-status wildlife species were analyzed in the PEIR, and the proposed treatment activities and intensity of disturbance as a result of implementing vegetation treatments are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR.”
– Treatment activities and intensity of disturbance are presented in the project description
80CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-2 Discussion
Impact BIO-2: Substantially Affect Special-Status Wildlife Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• CalVTP SPRs and MMs applicable to the proposed project
– “SPRs applicable to this impact are BIO-1, BIO-2, BIO-9, BIO-10, GEO-1, and HYD-4.”
– Mitigation Measures BIO-2a and BIO-2b: If species are observed during surveys, avoid mortality, injury and disturbance of individuals and maintain habitat function (e.g., no-disturbance buffers, monitoring, consultation with agencies)
– Pursuant to Mitigation Measure BIO-2a: “Midpen determined that implementation of initial and maintenance treatments would maintain habitat function for mountain lion and contacted CDFW to seek technical input on this determination.”
81CalVTP Implementation Training
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-2 Discussion
Impact BIO-2: Substantially Affect Special-Status Wildlife Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
• Conclusion regarding consistency with the PEIR
– “This impact of the proposed project is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR.”
82CalVTP Implementation Training
Impact in the PEIR Project-Specific Checklist
Environmental ImpactCovered in the PEIR
Identify Impact
Significance in the PEIR
Identify Locationof Impact Analysis
in the PEIR
Does the Impact Apply to the Treatment
Project?
List SPRs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
List MMs Applicable to the Treatment
Project1
Identify Impact Significance for
Treatment Project
Would This Be a Substantially More Severe
Significant Impact than Identified in the PEIR?
Is this Impact Within the
Scope of the PEIR?
Would the project:
Impact BIO-2: Substantially Affect Special-Status Wildlife Species Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications
LTSM(all wildlife
species except bumble bees)
SU(bumble bees)
Impact BIO-2,pages
3.6-138 – 3.6-184
Yes BIO-1BIO-2BIO-9
BIO-10GEO-1HYD-4
BIO-2aBIO-2b
LTSM No Yes
1NA: not applicable; there are no SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact. None: there are SPRs and/or MMs identified in the PEIR for this impact, but none are applicable to the treatment project.
Bear Creek Redwoods Example PSA:Biological Resources Impact BIO-2 Checklist
83CalVTP Implementation Training
QUESTIONS?
Project-Specific Analysis/Addendum to the CalVTP PEIR
PSA/Addendum
An addendum to an EIR is appropriate when:• a project or circumstances have changed since an EIR was certified, and• there are no new or substantially more severe significant environmental
impacts (CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15163, 15164, and 15168).
Changed treatment project conditions warranting preparation of an addendum:• portions of a treatment area extend outside the CalVTP treatable landscape
(e.g., into Local Responsibility Area),• use of a new herbicide not considered in the PEIR,• Others?
86CalVTP Implementation Training
PSA/Addendum
The schedule for preparing a PSA/addendum is the same as a PSANo public review required (like PSA)Checklist is the same as an PSA (same CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 considerations)Standard of review is the same (substantial evidence)Additional approval language is included for addendums in the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and NOD
87CalVTP Implementation Training
Grouse Ridge Example PSA/Addendum
Grouse Ridge Research Forest
• owned by Berkeley Forests (UC Berkeley)
• located in Nevada County
Approximately 406 acres of the 1,134-acre treatment area extends outside of the CalVTP treatable landscape
• dispersed in small sections of the treatment areas
88CalVTP Implementation Training
Grouse Ridge Vegetation Treatment Project
CCI Forest Health Grant Proposed Treatments• Fuel Break Installation
– Mastication, pile burn
• Roadside Fuel Reduction
• Wildfire Rehabilitation– Site preparation, herbicide, and planting.
• Prescribed Burning
• Mastication
CEQA’s Role in California’s Wildfire Crisis 89
Grouse Ridge Example PSA/Addendum
Additional requirements when preparing an addendum include:• Differentiate treatment areas within and outside of the treatable landscape,• Identify acreage that is within and outside of the treatable landscape,• Impact discussion should describe 1) why the impact is within the scope, and
2) why including areas outside of the treatable landscape do not trigger subsequent review (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162),
• Confirm if areas outside the treatable landscape result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts for each impact discussion, and
• Summarize any impacts resulting from areas outside the treatable landscape at the end of each resource section.
90CalVTP Implementation Training
Grouse Ridge Example PSA/Addendum: Impact AES-1
Impact discussion should describe 1) why the impact is within the scope, and 2) why including areas outside of the treatable landscape do not trigger subsequent review (Section 15162),
• “The inclusion of land in the proposed treatment area that is outside the CalVTPtreatable landscape constitutes a change to the geographic extent presented in the PEIR. However, within the boundary of the project area, the existing scenic resources are essentially the same within and outside of the treatable landscape; therefore, the short-term aesthetic impact is also the same, as described above.”
91CalVTP Implementation Training
Grouse Ridge Example PSA/Addendum: Impact AES-1
Confirm if areas outside the treatable landscape result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts for each impact discussion, and
• “This determination is consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR.”
92CalVTP Implementation Training
Grouse Ridge Example PSA/Addendum: Impact AES-1
Summarize any impacts resulting from areas outside the treatable landscape at the end of each resource section.
• “The project proponent has also determined that the inclusion of land in the proposed treatment area that is outside the CalVTP treatable landscape constitutes a change to the geographic extent presented in the PEIR. However, within the boundary of the project area, the existing environmental and regulatory conditions present in the areas outside the treatable landscape are essentially the same as those within the treatable landscape; therefore, the impacts of the proposed treatment project are also consistent with those considered in the PEIR.”
93CalVTP Implementation Training
QUESTIONS?
Focused ND, MND, EIR using the CalVTP PEIR
Focused ND, MND, EIR using the CalVTP
If an impact of a later treatment project is not within the scope, the CalVTPPEIR can be used to focus the subsequent or supplemental CEQA document a subsequent EIR on the impacts that are new or substantially more severe significant impacts (using CEQA Guidelines §§15162 and 15163).For new impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts, the PSA checklist can function as an Initial Study (CEQA Guidelines § 15168(d))• Documents the impacts that are within the scope
• Evaluates/identifies new impacts to support a focused ND, MND, or EIR
• Identifies substantially more severe significant impacts to support a focused MND or EIR
96CalVTP Implementation Training
97
CEQA Flow Chart for CalVTP PSAs
CalVTP Implementation Training
Part 3Decision Documentation and Approval Process
CalVTP CEQA Flow Chart – Project Approval
CalVTP Implementation Training 99
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) needs to be prepared for each vegetation treatment project and adopted by the lead agencyStart with the Program MMRP (available online)Adapt it to the vegetation treatment project:• Include only those SPRs and mitigation measures that apply to the project
• Update the applicability to initial and maintenance treatments, timing, implementing entity, and verifying/monitoring entity
• Include project-specific implementation instruction where needed
CalVTP Implementation Training 100
MMRP Example with Project-Specific Implementation
CalVTP Implementation Training 101
Standard Project Requirements Applicable? (Y/N) Timing ImplementingEntity
Verify/Monitoring Entity
Wildlife
SPR BIO-10: Survey for Special-Status Wildlife and Nursery Sites. If SPR BIO-1 determines that suitable habitat for special-status wildlife species or nurseries of any wildlife species is present and cannot be avoided, the project proponent will require a qualified RPF or biologist to conduct focused or protocol-level surveys for special-status wildlife species or nursery sites (e.g., bat maternity roosts, deer fawning areas, heron or egret rookeries, monarch overwintering sites) with potential to be directly or indirectly affected by a treatment activity. The survey area will be determined by a qualified RPF or biologist based on the species and habitats and any recommended buffer distances in agency protocols. The qualified RPF or biologist will determine if following an established protocol is required, and the project proponent may consult with CDFW and/or USFWS for technical information regarding appropriate survey protocols. Unless otherwise specified in a protocol, the survey will be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the beginning of treatment activities. Focused or protocol surveys for a special-status species with potential to occur in the treatment area may not be required if presence of the species is assumed.This SPR applies to all treatment activities and treatment types, including treatment maintenance.Project-Specific Implementation To avoid impacts on special-status salamanders (i.e., California giant salamander, Santa
Cruz black salamander), focused surveys (i.e., walk and turn surveys) would be conducted within habitat suitable for the species.
To determine whether California red-legged frogs are present within upland habitats in treatment areas, focused surveys would be conducted by a qualified biologist within 24 hours prior to implementation of all mechanical and manual treatments.
Initial Treatment: Y
Treatment Maintenance: Y
No more than 14 days prior to treatment (unless otherwise specified)
Midpen Midpen
CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
When an agency approves a vegetation treatment project using a within the scope finding for all environmental impacts, it must adopt its own CEQA findings pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091If significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a Statement of Overriding Considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project’s “benefits” rendered “acceptable” its “unavoidable adverse environmental effects” must also be adopted (CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, Section 21081, subd. (b)). The Findings template is available online
CalVTP Implementation Training 102
CEQA Findings Template for PSAs
Template includes instruction to usersFindings included for LTS, LTSM, and SU impactsImpacts listed are from CalVTP PEIR• Check those that are applicable• Delete impacts and mitigation measures
that are not applicable• Move impacts to lower significance level
as neededRecord of proceedings• Must be available for public review
CalVTP Implementation Training 103
PSA Adoption/Project Approval Process
Project Approval• Use of CalVTP does not require CAL FIRE approval, if it’s not the lead agency• Lead agency follows its own agency-specific procedures for project approval• As a part of project approval, Lead agency adopts CEQA Findings, Statement of Overriding
Considerations, and MMRP• PSA or PSA/Addendum provides substantial evidence supporting the adoption of CEQA FindingsFile NOD• With the State Clearinghouse, within 5 days of project approval• Use CalVTP PEIR receipt to show proof of paid CDFW CEQA filing feesSubmit approved project information to the Board of Forestry (per SPR AD-7):• Completed PSA Checklist• Completed MMRP• GIS package of project area(s)
CalVTP Implementation Training 104
CalVTPImplementation
Database –Approved Projects
CalVTP Implementation Training 105
QUESTIONS?
Project-Specific AnalysisMMRP Implementation
MMRP Implementation: Monitoring and Reporting
CEQA requires implementation of Mitigation Measures (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097)CEQA monitoring and reporting requirements end at MMRP adoption; monitoring and reporting are up to the lead agency• Best practice is to retain documentation/proof of implementation
SPR AD-7 requires information on completed projects (post-project implementation report)• GIS data of treated area, size of treated area, treatment types and activities, dates of work
• List of SPRs and mitigation measures implemented
• Any explanations regarding implementation if required by SPRs and mitigation measures
MMRP can become post-project implementation report with added columnsCalVTP Implementation Training 108
Yuba Foothills Healthy Forest Project PSA/Addendum
CalVTP Implementation Training 109
MMRP Implementation Guidance Document, Post-Project Implementation Report
Standard Project Requirements/ Mitigation Measures
TimingApplicable Treatment Activity
Implementation Guidance Implementation Reporting
SPR BIO-1: Review and Survey Project-Specific Biological Resources.
Prior to treatment
Mechanical, prescribed burning
See PSA for results of data review and reconnaissance survey. Was the measure implemented?☒ Yes☐ No
SPR BIO-7: Survey for Special-Status Plants.
Prior to treatment
Mechanical, prescribed burning
For treatments that would be implemented in parcels with gabbro soils, protocol-level surveys for the three species associated with this habitat (Pine Hill flannelbush, Layne’s ragwort, and chaparral sedge) will be conducted prior to implementation of treatments (see Appendix B for location of gabbro soils). If species are present, see Mitigation Measure BIO-1b for avoidance requirements.
Was the measure implemented?☐ Yes☐ No
MMRP Implementation Guidance Document, Post-Project Implementation Report
CalVTP Implementation Training 110
Standard Project Requirements/ Mitigation Measures
TimingApplicable Treatment Activity
Implementation Guidance Implementation Reporting
SPR AD-4: Public Notifications for Prescribed Burning.
At least three days prior to prescribed burning
Prescribed burning
Notify CAL FIRE Command Center in Grass Valley and the local Volunteer Fire Department
Was the measure implemented?☐ Yes☐ No
SPR AQ-2: Submit Smoke Management Plan.
At least seven days prior to prescribed burning
Prescribed burning
In compliance with regulations of the Feather River Air Quality Management District, submit a Plan for any proposed burn greater than 10 acres and which occurs at or above a mean elevation of 1000 feet. Complete plan on forms provided by the District.
Was the measure implemented?☐ Yes☐ No
MMRP Implementation: Required Explanations
Explanations regarding implementation required by SPRs and mitigation measures• Infeasibility explanation of implementing
stated avoidance measures for sensitivenatural communities and common nestingbirds (SPR BIO-12, MM BIO-3a)
• Explanation for a reduction in buffer size fora special-status species and for a reductionin percent surface cover in a WLPZ (SPRHYD-4, MM BIO-1a, MM BIO-2b)
CalVTP Implementation Training 111
MMRP Implementation: Required Explanations
CalVTP Implementation Training 112
Standard Project Requirements/ Mitigation Measures Timing Applicable
Treatment Activity Implementation Guidance Implementation Reporting
Mitigation Measure BIO-2b: Avoid Mortality, Injury, or Disturbance for Other Special-Status Wildlife Species Establish a no-disturbance buffer of at
least 100 feet around occupied sites. Buffer size may be adjusted if the
qualified RPF or biologist determines that such an adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect (i.e., cause mortality, injury, or disturbance to) the species.
If a no-disturbance buffer is reduced below 100 feet from an occupied site, a qualified RPF or biologist will provide the project proponent with a site and/or treatment activity-specific explanation for the buffer reduction in the post-project implementation report
Prior toand during treatment
Mechanical, prescribed burning,herbicide
Implement the following if surveys pursuant to SPR BIO-10 are required: If a purple martin nest is detected
during focused surveys, a no-disturbance buffer of at least 100 feet will be established around the nest, and no treatment activities will occur within this buffer until the chicks have fledged.
If an active pallid bat, Townsend’s big-eared bat, or western red bat roost is detected, a no-disturbance buffer of 250 feet will be established around the roost, and mechanical and manual treatments will not occur within this buffer.
Was the measure implemented?☐ Yes☐ No
Was any buffer reduced from the recommended size? ☐ Yes☐ NoIf so, provide a site-and/or treatment activity-specific explanation for the buffer reduction in the next row of this table.
Buffer Reduction Explanation (MM BIO-2b), if needed:
MMRP Implementation: Completed Projects
CalVTP Implementation Training 113
Questions?
Wrap Up and Final Thoughts
CalVTP Training Resources
BOF CalVTP Website• https://bof.fire.ca.gov/projects-and-programs/calvtp/
CalVTP PSA preparation – instruction summary sheet (PDF, 2 pages)• summary of most important points of the training, online links to informational
resources
CalVTP Program EIR – Volume 2 (PDF, searchable and bookmarked)PSA template (MS Word, 508 compliant)CEQA Findings template (MS Word, 508 compliant)CalVTP FAQs (December 2020)
CalVTP Implementation Training 116
CalVTP Training Resources, cont.
Bear Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve Vegetation Treatment Project• Final PSA• MMRP• Findings/Statement of Overriding Considerations• Notice of Determination• Emails documenting compliance with SPR AD-7
Grouse Ridge Vegetation Treatment Project• Final PSA/Addendum to PEIR• MMRP• Findings/Statement of Overriding Considerations• Notice of Determination• Emails documenting compliance with SPR AD-7
CalVTP Implementation Training 117
https://bof.fire.ca.gov/projects-and-programs/calvtp/Thank you!