California’s Safer Consumer Products · PDF file14.06.2017 · Department of...

download California’s Safer Consumer Products · PDF file14.06.2017 · Department of Toxic Substances Control Cal/EPA California’s Safer Consumer Products Independent Review Panel June

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of California’s Safer Consumer Products · PDF file14.06.2017 · Department of...

  • Department of Toxic Substances Control Cal/EPA

    Californias Safer Consumer Products

    Independent Review Panel June 14, 2017

    Meredith Williams, Deputy Director, Safer Products and Workplaces ProgramKarl Palmer, Branch Chief, Safer Consumer Products Branch

  • 2

    Safer Consumer Products Branch

    VisionProducts are made with chemicals that are safe for people and the environment.

    MissionTo advance the design, development, and use of products that are chemically safer for people and the environment.

  • 3

  • 4

  • For today

    The Problem Origins and solutions Why Green Chemistry?

    The Safer Consumer Products regulations Framework regulations Implementation to date

    Building the program our approach, a look forward5

  • 6

  • Statutory pitfalls: regrettable substitutes

    7

  • Legislative whack-a-mole

    8

  • 9

    http://coeh.berkeley.edu/greenchemistry/briefing/ https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PollutionPrevention/GreenChemistryInitiative/upload/GREEN_Chem.pdf

  • 10

  • 11

  • Toxics in Products Authorities Toxics in packaging Lead and arsenic containing jewelry Lead in plumbing Lead wheel weights General purpose lights Electronic devices Mercury containing devices Copper Brake Pads Safer Consumer Products

    12

  • 13

  • 14

    The utilization of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture, and application of the chemical products.

    - Anastas and WarnerGreen Chemistry: Theory and Practices

  • 2007-2017: Californias Approach

    Green Chemistry

    Report

    2008 Statutory Authority

    2010 Draft

    Regulations

    2013 Safer

    Consumer Products

    Regulations

    2014Draft Initial

    Priority Products

    2015 Three Year Work Plan

    2017 Alternatives

    Analysis Guide

    Product listings

    15

  • Safer Consumer Products Foundational Questions

    Is it necessary? Is there a safer alternative?

    16

  • 17

    The CA Framework: Producer Responsibility

  • DTSC Startup Citywww.martin prosperity.org2014

    18

  • SCP regulations

    Regulatory framework 4 step process

    Implementation: work to date Priority Products Alternatives Analysis

    19

  • Safer Consumer Products framework

    As designated by 23 authoritative bodies

    DTSC selects Product-Chemical combinations that may cause harm

    Manufacturer evaluation of alternatives

    DTSC considers range of possible responses

    20

    California Code of Regulations, title 22Chapter 55. Safer Consumer Products Sections 69501 through 69510

  • 23 Authoritative Bodies Updated Quarterly

    Example lists Prop 65 list Biomonitoring CA priority chemicals US EPA identified carcinogins Toxics Release Inventory PBTs CWA 303(c) and (d) pollutants

    Exclusions FIFRA pesticides Prescription drugs Food Medical devices and dental restorative

    materials

    Searchable databasehttps://calsafer.dtsc.ca.gov/chemical/search.aspx

    21

    http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SCP/SourceLists.cfmhttps://calsafer.dtsc.ca.gov/chemical/search.aspx

  • 22

    Prioritization PrinciplesPotential exposure to the Candidate Chemicals in the product

    AND

    Potential for exposures to contribute to or cause significant or widespread adverse impacts

    Selecting Product-Chemical Combinations

  • Potential exposure to the Candidate Chemicals in the product AND

    Potential for exposures to contribute to or causesignificant or widespread adverse impacts

    Chemicals are considered in the product context

    People, aquatic, avian or terrestrial animals or plants

    Consideration of entire life cycle of product

    Availability of safer alternatives Special Consideration for:

    Sensitive sub-populations Environmentally sensitive habitats Endangered species

    23

  • 2. Adopting Priority Products

    WorkshopsMeetings

    CommentsData/Information

    ResearchQ/A

    RefinementDialog

    Rulemaking:- Supporting

    documents- Formal comment

    period- Formal hearing

    24

  • Key Concepts Manufacturer evaluation Public comment CBI protections Life Cycle Thinking

    25

  • Alternatives Analysis Process

    26

    Transparency measures

  • Factors to be considered in the AA:Adverse environmental impactsAdverse public health impactsAdverse waste and end-of-life effectsEnvironmental fateMaterials and resource consumption impactsPhysical chemical hazardsPhysicochemical propertiesAssociated exposure pathways and life cycle

    segments

    27

    Division 4.5, Title 22, California Code of Regulations Chapter 54 Green Chemistry Hazard Traits, Toxicological and Environmental Endpoints and Other Relevant Data

    http://oehha.ca.gov/multimedia/green/pdf/GC_Regtext011912.pdf

  • 28

  • 29

    No response Additional information to DTSC Additional information to consumer Additional safety measures Restrictions/Prohibitions on sales End-of-life product stewardship Research funding

  • Implementation

    30

  • Priority Products List: Childrens foam-padded sleeping products with TDCPP or TCEP

    Flame retardants with carcinogenicity and developmental toxicity Nap Mats Soft sided portable cribs Play pens Bassinets

    Regulations effective July 1 Protecting children

    31

  • Spray Polyurethane Foam with unreacted MDI

    Worker exposures Respiratory sensitization Asthmagen

    Rulemaking underway Comments closed June 6

    32

  • Methylene chloride paint strippers

    33

  • Methylene chloride paint strippers

    Widely used by businesses and DIYers Carcinogen Neurotoxicant Workers and consumers hurt or killed every

    year

    34

  • Work Plan

    Policy Priorities Sensitive subpopulations

    children, workers Aquatic impacts Built environment Selected exposure pathways and

    evidence- Biomonitoring- Indoor air - Direct and clear exposure routes

    35

    http://dtsc.ca.gov/SCP/upload/PriorityProductWorkPlan_2015.pdf

  • Household/Office Furniture/

    FurnishingsBeauty, Personal Care and Hygiene Products

    Building Products Paint Products, Adhesives, Sealants, Flooring

    Cleaning Products

    ClothingFishing and Angling Equipment

    Office Machinery Consumable Products

    2015 2017 Priority Product Work Plan Categories

    36

  • Step 1: Chemical scoping to identify key chemicals with potential impacts related to policy priorities

    Step 2: Research on chemical uses in products

    Step 3: Initial public engagement

    Step 4: Specifying chemical-product combinationsor additional engagement and research

    Step 5: Rulemaking

    Picking Products

    37

  • Potential Aquatic Impacts and Continued Uses of Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs)

    Commercial detergents Clothing Toilet paper Cleaners Paint

    LA Region POTW effluent

    Data from large NPDES dischargers

    Information gathering continues uses, presence in the environment38

  • Potential Aquatic Impacts and Continued Uses of Triclosan

    FDA actionTriclosan and triclocarban in liquid, foam, gel hand soaps, bar soaps, and body washes

    39

  • Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Carpets, Rugs, Indoor Upholstered Furniture, and Their Care and Treatment Products

    Can cause cancer, kidney, liver disease Extremely persistent Long half life All PFASs listed via California

    Biomonitoring program High potential for regrettable

    substitution 1/31 workshop

    40

  • 41

  • Nail salon products

    Extensive worker exposures Chemicals beyond formaldehyde, toluene, DBP Hosted workshop 3/2 Initial stakeholder input submitted AB 2125 Healthy Nail Salon Recognition

    http://dtsc.ca.gov/SCP/Workshops.cfm

    42

  • Lead Acid Batteries Governor Brown and Legislative mandates Department-wide focus to address batteries Evaluating lead acid batteries as potential Priority

    Product Building on research and findings of the

    Community Protection and Hazardous Waste Reduction Initiative

    43

  • Petition process Process allows submittal of data and analysis requesting DTSC

    action BPA in can linings petition received Completeness review complete Undergoing merits review

    44

    View petition at https://calsafer.dtsc.ca.gov/

    https://calsafer.dtsc.ca.gov/

  • CalSAFER: SCPs Information Management System

    45

    https://calsafer.dtsc.ca.gov/

    https://calsafer.dtsc.ca.gov/chemical/search.aspx

  • 46

  • Alternatives Analysis

    47

    What are the trade offs?What information is available?

    What are the data gaps?What will meet the performance criteria?

    Does this alternative have a downside?

  • Alternatives Analysis Guidance

    48

  • AA Guide

    To be released in June 2017 Will be updated regularly DTSC will work with regulated

    sectors on technical assistance

    49

  • 2017 Calendar

    SPF comments closed June 6 BPA petition determination June Alternatives Analysis Guide release June Nap mats regs effective July 1 Green Ribbon Science Panel meeting July 17-18 Draft 2018-2020 Priority Product Work Plan December

    50

  • Build Capacity

    Lead the Way

    Execute

    The Three Pillars of the SCP Program

    51

  • Build Capacity

    52

  • Ex