California High Speed Rail Project
description
Transcript of California High Speed Rail Project
![Page 1: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
California High Speed Rail Project
Palo Alto Chamber of CommerceMay 27, 2010
![Page 2: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CARRD
Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design Founders
– Nadia Naik, Sara Armstrong, Elizabeth Alexis, Rita Wespi
– Palo Alto base, State wide focus We are not transportation experts, we are not lawyers Contact info
– website: www.calhsr.com– email: [email protected]
![Page 3: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CARRD Approach
Process focus – Collaborative, open, constructive approach– We do NOT advocate for a particular implementation or
route Engage community and encourage participation
– Wisdom of crowds, creative solutions– Tools for self-advocacy
Watchdogs for– Transparency – push to get more information public– Accountability – demand professionalism, accuracy– Oversight – encourage State Senate, Peer Review
![Page 4: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
California High Speed Rail Project
1980’s – California begins researching HSR 1993 – California Inter-City High Speed Rail
Commission 1994 – Federal “High Speed Rail Development Act”
creates five national HSR corridors 2002 – First bond measure proposed but delayed 2004 – Statewide system studied 2005 – Ridership surveys and studies 2008 – Bay Area to Central Valley EIR November 2008 - Prop 1A authorized State Bond
Funds– plan, construct and operate a High Speed Train system
from San Francisco to Los Angeles/Anaheim
![Page 5: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
HSR System
800 mile network Electric powered trains
via overhead contact wires
Maximum speed of 220 miles per hour
Fully grade-separated, dedicated track alignment
Automated safety systems (Positive train control)
![Page 6: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
California HSR Governance
High Speed Rail Authority– 9 appointed Board members– less than dozen state employees– 4 tiered web of consultants / contractors do the bulk of the
work Legislature – controls State bond funds
– Senate Transportation & Housing - Lowenthal– Senate Budget Subcommittee 2 – Simitian– Legislative Analysts Office
Peer Review Committee– 8 appointed members (5 of 8 so far)– No staff, no meetings (yet). Update: budget allocated
Federal Agencies – FRA, FTA
![Page 7: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Funding Plan
Backbone System Cost: $42.6 billion– Federal Grants $17 - $19 billion– State Bond Funds $9 billion (Prop 1A)– Local Contributions $4 - $5 billion– Private Investors $10 - $12 billion
Awarded $2.25 billion stimulus funds (we only get it if we make the deadlines)
Plan calls for $3 Billion in Federal funding every year for 6 yrs
![Page 8: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Environmental Review Process
Mandated by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Administrative, linear process Applicant studies impacts, mitigations,
alternatives Lead Agency certifies the studies Responsible for enforcing CEQA: you! You must participate in the process to have
any recourse if you don’t like the final decision
![Page 9: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Ridership Study / Analysis / Model
San
Fran
cisc
o - S
an J
ose
Tiered Approach to CEQA
San
Jose
-M
erce
dBay Area -
CentralValley 2008
Mer
ced
- Fr
esno
Fres
no -
Bak
ersf
ield
Bak
ersf
ield
- Pa
lmda
le
Palm
dale
–
Los
Ang
eles
Los
Ang
eles
- A
nahe
im
Statewide EIR2005
![Page 10: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Bay Area to Central Valley
Program Level analyzed two routes
– East Bay via Altamont– Peninsula via Pacheco
Pacheco Route / Caltrain Corridor Selected
– Litigation challenged the decision.
– EIR decertified and re-circulated.
Altamont corridor will be an “overlay” to main HSR line
![Page 11: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
San Francisco to San Jose
Caltrain Corridor Caltrain + HSRA =
Peninsula Rail Program Caltrain and Freight will
continue operations during construction
![Page 12: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Structural & Operational changes
Current ProposedCommuter + Freight Commuter + Freight + HSR
Diesel engines, manual control Electric trains w/ PTC (freight trains remain diesel)
2 tracks; passing tracks; freight spurs
4 track system, freight spurs
47 grade level crossings Fully grade separated
12 trains/hr peak 20 HS trains/hr peak +20 Caltrains/hr peak
79 mph max speed 125 mph max speed
SF – SJ via Baby Bullet: 57 min SF – SJ via HSR: 30 min
![Page 13: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SF – SJ Build Costs &Timeline
Project Costs– $6.14 B in Year of Expenditure $– ARRA award set up $400M for Transbay
Terminal Timeline
– Dec 2010 - Draft EIR– Jul 2011 – Final EIR– Sep 2011 – Record of Decision– Winter 2012 – Begin construction– Summer 2019 – Revenue Service
![Page 15: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Palo Alto
Track Configuration– 2 additional tracks needed– Constrained right of way widths near
Paly/Southgate Grade Separations
– Alma, Churchill, Meadow, Charleston Potential HSR Station
– Station design options– Local requirements & contributions– Selection Process
![Page 16: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Palo Alto Right of Way*
Peer
s Par
k
Meado
wCh
arles
ton
San
Anto
nio
Unive
rsity
Emba
rcad
ero
Alm
a
Cal A
ve96 ft85 ft79 ft
*Approximate – not perfectly to scale. Not official diagram.
![Page 17: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Type DesignWidth
approx Cost
Above Grade Aerial Viaduct80-105 3X base
At GradeAt Grade
(Road over/under pass)
95-105 Highly variable
Below Grade
Open Trench 100 3.5X base
Cut & cover (trench) 100-140 5X base
Bored tunnel 70-115 7X base
![Page 18: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Aerial Viaduct
![Page 20: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
At Grade (Cars can NOT go over like they do today)
Highly Variable based road and property configuration
![Page 21: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Trench
![Page 22: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Cut and Cover
![Page 23: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Deep Bored Tunnel – High Speed Rail ONLY
![Page 24: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Palo Alto Alternatives Carried Forward
![Page 26: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Palo Alto Alternatives Eliminated
Berm/Retained fill eliminated– Where: throughout Palo Alto– Why: community objection
Open Trench, Closed Trench, Viaduct– Where: Alma– Why: El Palo Alto & San Fransisquito Creek,
Historic Train Station Underground Station & deep tunnel Caltrain
– Where: corridor wide– Why: cost constraints
![Page 27: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Mid Peninsula Station
One or none of– Redwood City, Palo Alto, Mountain View
Palo Alto has second highest Caltrain ridership (followed by Mountain View)
Station designs currently being studied Local requirements
– Parking, transit facilities– Funding support
City of Palo Alto has not taken a formal position
![Page 28: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Getting Involved
With HSRA– Officially via comments to the Environmental Review
process– As a CSS Stakeholder
With your community– PAN and other grassroots groups– City of Palo Alto
Palo Alto HSR Subcommittee meetings (1st & 3rd Thurs 8:30 am)
– Peninsula Cities Consortium www.peninsularail.com
– County, State and National Legislators– Talk to your friends
![Page 29: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Tips on writing a good comment
Be Objective and Specific– Whenever possible, present facts or expert
opinions. – If not, provide personal experience or your
personal observations. Don't just complain Separate your concerns into clearly
identifiable paragraphs or headings. Don't mix topics.
![Page 30: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Areas of Study
Air Quality Noise / Vibration Traffic and Circulation Land Use, Development,
Planning, & Growth Biological Resources Wetlands / Waters of the
U.S. Flood Hazards,
Floodplains, and Water Quality
Visual Quality & Aesthetics Parks & Recreational
Facilities Historic / Archeological
Resources Hazards and Hazardous
Materials Community Impacts /
Environmental Justice Construction Impacts Cumulative Impacts
![Page 31: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Catalog community assets
Identify “sensitive” areas– Historic Resources– Natural Resources
Open space, trees, wildlife, wetlands/creeks– Sensitive areas
Schools, hospitals, places of worship, funeral homes Parklands
– Business Interests Describe community values
![Page 32: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Identify Impacts & Mitigations
Identify the specific impact in question Explain the significance of effect Consider ways to avoid or reduce severity
– Describe additional mitigation measure(s) needed
– Recommend changes in proposed mitigations Support your recommendations Quantify your concerns whenever possible
![Page 33: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Suggest Alternatives
Offer specific alternatives Describe how they meet the requirements of
the project Can be on specific alignments, operations,
financing, etc Suggest different analysis methodologies
![Page 34: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Help provide accurate record
Point out any inconsistencies in the document or the data
Point out outdated information or Errors in logic Focus on the sufficiency of the information in
identifying and analyzing the possible impacts of the project on the environment
![Page 35: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Remember
Don’t be overwhelmed You know your community – just write about it The burden of proof is on the Authority – not you! If you don’t offer ideas, we miss a chance for
“Best Practices”
Democracy is not a spectator sport!
![Page 37: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Context Sensitive Solutions
Collaborative approach– Involves all stakeholders – Works by consensus – Balance transportation
needs and community values
Proven Process Adopted by Peninsula
Rail Program for SF-SJ– First time it is being used
on a Rail Project– “Toolkit” to collect
community information
![Page 39: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Climate
Incredibly ambitious & complex project– Technical, funding, political, environmental, procedural
challenges– Recognized benefits– Tremendous costs
Bunker mentality Community Skepticism
– Extent of impacts– Lack of specificity– Change is often painful
Economic meltdown, budget crisis
![Page 40: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Grassroots Landscape
Groups throughout the State – each with their own focus
Common theme: Serve to educate elected officials & public on the issues
Act as watchdogs for process – request information and access to data used for decisions
Speak publicly at Senate, Assembly, City meetings, etc.
![Page 41: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Context Sensitive Solutions Steps
![Page 42: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Context Sensitive Solutions
Collaborative approach– Involves all stakeholders – Works by consensus – Balance transportation needs and community
values Proven Process Adopted by Peninsula Rail Program for SF-
SJ– First time it is being used on a Rail Project– “Toolkit” to collect community information
![Page 43: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
CSS Toolkit
Available at Caltrain/Peninsula Rail Program Website
Seeks community feedback on all alignment options
Serves as a framework– Do not feel confined by the template – you can
elaborate– You can write your comments too!
Early participation is the best way to ensure your ideas and concerns are incorporated
![Page 44: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Altamont Corridor Project
![Page 45: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Bay Area to Central Valley Issues
Cumulative Impacts– Altamont + Pacheco
Ridership Claims– May 6, 2010: legal action seeks to reopen Court’s
decision New Altamont route proposal Union Pacific Position
– “no part of the high-speed rail corridor may be located on (or above, except for overpasses) UP’s rights of way at any location. To the extent the Authority ignores this position, its revised EIR is deficient.”
![Page 46: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Example – Noise Pollution
Provide inventory of sensitive areas– assume most impactful alternative
900 feet on either side of tracks 1/4 mile radius from Stations
Be Specific– document location, population, hours, layout– reference standards (City, Federal, WHO, etc)– request specific analyses and mitigations– Identify any omissions, inaccuracies and errors in
the document
![Page 47: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Menlo Park
Alternatives
![Page 48: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Menlo Park
Track Configuration– 2 additional tracks needed– Right of Way width < 100 ft thru most of City
Wakins ~ 85 ft Encinal ~ 75 ft Glenwood – Oak Grove ~ 60 ft South of Station ~ 80-100 ft
Grade Separations– (Watkins), Encinal, Glenwood, Oak Grove,
Ravenswood, (Alma) Caltrain Station reconfiguration
![Page 49: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Alternatives for Menlo Park
![Page 51: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Menlo Park Alternatives Eliminated
Berm/Retained Fill – Where: throughout city– Why: widespread community opposition
Open Trench– Where: border w/ Palo Alto– Why: San Francisquito Creek & El Palo Alto
Deep Tunnel for Caltrain– Where: corridor wide– Why: excessive cost
![Page 52: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Mountain View
Alternatives
![Page 53: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Mountain View
Additional 2 tracks– Minimum 79 feet of ROW
Grade Separations– Rengstorff, Castro
Potential HSR Station– Station design options– Local requirements & contributions– Selection Process
![Page 54: California High Speed Rail Project](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062521/56816830550346895dddd7cb/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Mountain View Alternatives