Cálculo de Cw
-
Upload
adriano-aquino -
Category
Documents
-
view
249 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Cálculo de Cw
-
Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of
Built-Up Runway Girders
Wei T. Hsu, Dung M. Lue* and Bor T. Hsiao
Department of Civil Engineering, National Chung-Hsing University,
Taichung, Taiwan 402, R.O.C.
Abstract
It is a common practice in a crane runway girder to place a channel, open-side down, over the
top flange of a W-shape. The crane runway girder with section mentioned above called as WC
(W-shape with Channel Cap) or SC (S-shape with Channel Cap) girder by authors is an efficient and
economical one. The warping constants (Cw) of the WC/SC girders are not provided in the AISC
design manuals because the Cw calculation for a WC/SC section is not a routine process but a tedious
task.
This study summarizes the theoretical Cw formulas which are expressed in terms of
mathematical integration. The integration formulas can be written in terms of numerical expressions
by considering the fact that the section is made up of thin-walled plate elements. Since the Cw which in
terms of numerical expressions is too complicated to be completed by hand-held calculators, the Cw is
set to be calculated by computer. The accuracy of computer-assisted results is compared with the
Australian built-up sections of crane runway girder and the results are quite compatible. The calculated
values of Cw will make engineers to better evaluate the elastic critical moment (Mcr) of the girders with
WC/SC sections.
Key Words: Runway Girder, Warping Constants, WC/SC Girder
1. Introduction
The WC/SC section (refer to Figure1) resisting an
applied torsional moment is subjected to pure torsional
stresses, warping shear stresses, and warping normal
stresses. The evaluation of warping related stresses is not
an easy task for practicing engineers and the difficulty
comes from the calculation of warping constant (Cw).
The Cw values of open thin-walled section are provided
in the AISC design manuals (1989 [1], 1993 [2], 1999
[3], 2005 [4]) for some practical sections but not for
WC/SC sections. The Cw calculation of a WC/SC section
is not a routine process but is a tedious and complicated
task.
This study aims to manipulate theoretical formulas
which expressed in terms of mathematical integration.
Viewing the fact that the section is made up of open
thin-walled plate elements, the integration formulas can
be written in terms of numerical expressions.
Because the warping constant Cw, which in terms of
numerical expressions, is too complicated to be com-
pleted by hand-held calculators, the Cw is set to be calcu-
lated by computer. The accuracy of computer-assisted
results are checked and identified with the Australian
built-up section of crane runway girder, which is a lip-
ped section (refer to Figure 2) closely approximates the
WC/SC section. The comparison results are quite com-
patible. The obtained Cw values will make practicing en-
gineers to calculate the elastic critical moment (Mcr) of
WC/SC girders much easier as compared with the ones
provided by the current LRFD Specification [4].
Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 381389 (2009) 381
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
-
2. Integration Formulas for Warping
Constant of WC/SC Section
According to Galambos [5] and Heins [6], the inte-
gration formulas for warping constants of open thin-
walled sections which include the WC/SC sections can
be summarized (refer to Figures 3) and are given as fol-
lows. To calculate the value ofCw, the centroid of section
and the shear center of section had to be located first.
Based on the basic mechanics, the centroid of section
C(Xc, Yc), refer to Figures 3, can be given as follows.
The centroid of section: C(Xc, Yc)
(1)
where x and y are the x and y coordinates of dA along the
section and A is the area of open thin-walled section.
According to Galambos [5], the shear center of sec-
tion S(Xs, Ys), refer to Figure 3, can be given as follows.
The shear center of section: S(Xs, Ys)
(2)
(2.a)
where
(2.b)
The terms Ix and Iy are moments of inertia about the x
and y axes, respectively. The termw is the warping defor-
mation of any point on the middle line a distance s from
the edge o and the terms Iwx and Iwy are warping products
of inertia about x and y axes, respectively. Iwx and Iwy can
be obtained by performing the integration, some algebra
and noting that cosij = (xj xi) / Lij (refer to Figure 5).
The warping constant of section: Cw
(3)
where
(3.a)
(3.b)
(3.c)
382 Wei T. Hsu et al.
Figure 1. Built-up WC and SC sections.
Figure 2. Section for Australian runway Beam.
Figure 3. Thin-walled open cross section.
-
where Wn the normalized unit warping, ws the unit war-
ping with respect to shear center, t the thickness of plate
element, s the distance between the tangent and the
shear center, and A the area of section.
3. Numerical Formulas for Warping Constant
of WC/SC Section
Because the WC/SC sections are made up of open
thin-walled plate elements (Figure 4), the computation
of the torsional section properties can be greatly simpli-
fied by the fact that between points of intersection the
unit warping properties w, ws, and Wn vary linearly (Fig-
ure 5). The theoretical integration formulas based on
Galambos [5] can be written in terms of numerical ex-
pressions and are given as follows.
The centroid of section: C(Xc, Yc)
(4)
where xi and yi are the x-coordinate and y-coordinate of
plate element i, respectively, and Ai is the area of plate
element i.
The shear center of section: S(Xs, Ys)
(5)
where Ixy is the product of inertia. Because the built-up
sections of WC/SC are singly symmetrical sections, we
have Ixy = 0 and above equations of shear center can be
rewritten as follows.
(6)
where
(6.a)
(6.b)
(6.c)
The unit warping property w is the unit warping with
respect to the centroid. xi and xj are the x coordinates of
the ends of the element. yi and yj are the y coordinates of
the ends of the element. wi and wj are the corresponding
values ofw at the ends of element. t the thickness of plate
element, ij the distance between the tangent of element
ij and the centroid and Lij the length of element ij.
The warping constant of section:
(7)
where
(7.a)
Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 383
Figure 4. WC section.Figure 5. Distribution of warping deformation w on a plate
element.
-
(7.b)
(7.c)
The unit warping properties ws and Wn are the unit
warping with respect to the shear center and the normal-
ized unit warping, respectively. ws the unit warping with
respect to shear center. wsi and wsj are the corresponding
values of ws at the ends of element, tij is the thickness of
plate element ij, ij the distance between the tangent of el-
ement ij and the centroid and Lij the length of element ij.
4. Numerical Steps for Calculation of
Warping Constant
The numerical steps for the calculation of WC/SC
warping constant is summarized as follows.
(1) The centroid of section: C(Xc, Yc)
(4)
(2) The shear center of section: S(Xs, Ys)
(6)
(3) The warping constant of section: Cw
(7)
5. Illustrated Example
Proceed the steps specified in the previous section to
evaluate the warping constant of a built-up section made
of W36 150 and C15 33.9. The built-up section is di-
vided into eleven plate elements and their related joint
numbers are given as shown in Figure 4.
Solution: unit conversion 1 in. = 2.54 cm
Section properties of W36 150 based on the AISC de-
sign manual.
A = 44.2 in.2, d = 35.85 in., tw = 0.625 in., bf = 11.975 in.,
tf = 0.940 in.
Section properties of C15 33.9 based on the AISC de-
sign manual.
A = 9.96 in.2, d = 15.00 in., tw = 0.400 in., bf = 3.400 in.,
tf = 0.650 in.
(1) The centroid of section : C(Xc, Yc)
The coordinates and areas for each plate element (i)
of the WC section are summarized as given in Table 1.
Substitute these values (xi, yi, and Ai included in Table 1)
into the formula of centroid (Eq. 5) and the values of Xc
and Yc can be obtained. The coordinates for the centroid
(Xc, Yc)= (7.500 in., 21.146 in.) with respect to the lower
left corner, the origin of the coordinates as shown in
Figure 4.
(2) The shear center of section: S(Xs, Ys)
The terms Ix and Iy are moments of inertia about the x
and y axes, respectively. The Ix and Iy values of the built-
up section can be calculated by using the tabulated va-
lues given in the AISC design manual and be calculated
as below.
Ix = Ix(w-shape) + Iy(channel) + Aw d12 + Ac d2
2 = 11372 in.4
Iy = Iy(w-shape) + Ix(channel) = 583 in.4
where Aw the area of w-shape, Ac the area of channel, d1
= the distance between the y coordinate of centroid of
built-up section and the centroid of w-shape section, d2
= the distance between the y coordinate of centroid of
built-up section and the y coordinate of centroid of
channel.
To obtain the warping product of inertia (Iwx), the
parameters including xi, xj, wi, wj, tij, and Lij are required
and are listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4. Substitute these
384 Wei T. Hsu et al.
Table 1. Coordinates and areas of plate elements
element no. (i) xi (in.) yi (in.) Ai (in.2)
01 04.506 00.470 5.628
02 07.500 17.925 21.2310
03 04.506 35.580 8.023
04 01.512 35.580 0.000
05 00.756 36.050 0.605
06 00.325 34.350 1.950
07 10.494 00.470 5.628
08 10.494 35.580 8.023
09 13.488 35.580 0.000
10 14.244 36.050 0.605
11 14.675 34.350 1.950
-
Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 385
Table 2. Joint coordinates, lengths, and thicknesses of plate element
element no. joint no. xi / xj (in.) yi / yj (in.) Lij (in.) tij (in.)
1(i) -5.988- -20.676-01
2(j) 0.000 -20.676-
05.988 0.940
2(i) 0.000 -20.676-02
3(j) 0.000 14.434
35.110 0.625
3(i) 0.000 14.43403
4(j) -5.988- 14.434
05.988 1.340
4(i) -5.988- -14.434-04
5(j) -5.988- 14.904
00.470 0.000
5(i) -5.988- 14.90405
6(j) -7.175- 14.904
01.188 0.400
6(i) -7.175- 14.90406
7(j) -7.175- 11.704
03.200 0.650
8(i) 5.988 -20.676-07
2(j) 0.000 -20.676-
05.988 0.940
9(i) 5.988 14.43408
3(j) 0.000 14.434
05.988 1.340
10(i) 5.988 14.90409
9(j) 5.988 14.434
00.470 0.000
11(i) 7.175 14.90410
10(j) 5.988 14.904
01.188 0.400
12(i) 7.175 11.70411
11(j) 7.175 14.904
03.200 0.650
Table 3. Unit wrappings wi and wj
element no. ij (in.) Lij (in.) wij (in.2) joint no. wi (in.
2) wj (in.
2)
1(i) 0.00001 20.676 5.988 123.800
2(j) 123.800
2(i) 123.80002 0.000 35.1100 0.000
3(j) 123.800
3(i) 123.80003 14.434 5.988 86.421
4(j) 210.221
4(i) 210.22104 -5.988 0.470 -2.814
5(j) 207.407
5(i) 207.40705 14.907 1.188 17.698
6(j) 225.105
6(i) 225.10506 7.175 3.200 22.960
7(j) 248.065
8(i) 247.60007 -20.676 5.988 -123.80
2(j) 123.800
9(i) 37.37808 14.434 5.988 86.421
3(j) 123.800
10(i) 40.19209 -5.988 0.470 -2.814
9(j) 037.378
11(i) 22.49410 14.904 1.188 17.698
10(j) 040.192
12(i) -0.46511 7.175 3.200 22.960
11(j) 022.494
-
parameters (xi, xj, wi, wj, tij, and Lij) into the given for-
mulae (Equations 6, 6.a, 6.b, and 6.c) and the value of Iwx
can be obtained. The shear center of section is then deter-
mined by using Eq. (6) and
Ys = Iwx / Iy = 3932.55 / 583.13 = 6.744 in.
Therefore, the shear center is S (Xs, Ys) = (0 in., 6.74 in.)
or S (Xs, Ys) = (7.50 in., 27.89 in.) with respect to left
lower corner as shown in Figure 4.
(3) The warping constant of section: (Cw)
The required parameters including wsi, wsj, Wni, Wnj,
tij, and Lij are listed in Tables 5, 6, 7, and 8. Substitute
these values (wsi,wsj,Wni,Wnj, tij, Lij and refer to Figure 4)
386 Wei T. Hsu et al.
Table 4. Calculation for warping product of inertia (Iwx)
element no. wi xi wj xj tij Lij1
3( + ) wi xj wj xi
1
6( + )
01 0 0 5.629 0 0 0-741.31 -695.47
02 0 0 21.9440 0 0 0 0
03 0 -1258.8 8.024 -3366.87 0-741.31 0 -991.38
04 -1258.8 -1241.9 0 0 -1258.80 -1241.95 0
05 -1241.9 -1615.1 0.475 0-452.36 -1488.15 -1347.93 -224.52
06 -1615.1 -1779.9 2.080 -2353.87 -1615.13 -1779.87 -1176.93-
07 -1482.6 0 5.629 -2781.85 0 -0741.31 -695.47
08 -0223.8 0 8.024 -0598.59 0 -0741.31 -991.38
09 -0240.6 -0223.8 0 0 -0240.67 -0233.82 0
10 -0161.4 -0240.6 0.475 -0063.65 -0134.70 -0288.38 -033.49
11 000-3.3 -0161.4 2.080 -0109.62 000-3.33 -0161.40 -054.80
-2619.39 -1313.16-
Iwx = + = -3932.55 in.5
Table 5. Unit wrappings wsi and wsj
element no. sij (in) Lij (in) sij Lij (in2) joint i, j wsi wsj
1(i) 000.00001 27.4200 5.988 164.179
2(j) 164.179
2(i) 164.17902 0.000 35.1100 0.000
3(j) 164.179
3(i) 164.17903 7.690 5.988 46.042
4(j) 210.221
4(i) 210.22104 -5.988- 0.470 -2.814
5(j) 207.407
5(i) 207.40705 8.160 1.188 9.690
6(j) 217.097
6(i) 217.09706 7.175 3.200 22.960
7(j) 240.057
8(i) 328.35707 -27.420-0 5.988 -164.179
2(j) 164.179
9(i) 118.13608 7.690 5.988 46.042
3(j) 164.179
10(i) 120.95009 -5.988- 0.470 -2.814
9(j) 118.136
11(i) 111.26110 8.160 1.188 9.690
10(j) 120.950
12(i) 088.30111 7.175 3.200 22.960
11(j) 111.261
-
Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 387
Table 6. Values of Wni + wsi or Wnj + wsj
element no. tij (in.) Lij (in.) joint i, j wsi wsj tij Lij A (in.2) (CV)i
*(in.
2)
1(i) 000.00001 0.940 5.988
2(j) 164.1795.629 54.357 0924.164
2(i) 164.17902 0.625 35.1100
3(j) 164.17921.9440 54.357 7205.488
3(i) 164.17903 1.340 5.988
4(j) 210.2218.024 54.357 3004.185
4(i) 210.22104 0.000 0.470
5(j) 207.4070 54.357 0
5(i) 207.40705 0.400 1.188
6(j) 217.0970.475 54.357 0201.639
6(i) 217.09706 0.650 3.200
7(j) 240.0572.080 54.357 950.88
8(i) 328.35707 0.940 5.988
2(j) 164.1795.629 54.357 2772.485
9(i) 118.13608 1.340 5.988
3(j) 164.1798.024 54.357 2265.295
10(i) 120.95009 0.000 0.470
9(j) 118.1360 54.357 0
11(i) 111.26110 0.400 1.188
10(j) 120.9500.475 54.357 0110.300
12(i) 088.30111 0.650 3.200
11(j) 111.2612.080 54.357 0415.087
(CV)i 17849.52 in2
( ) (refer to Eqs. 7.a and 7.b)i ni si nj sjCV W w W w ;
2
1 1
1 1( ) ( ) 164.179 .
2 2
n n
si sj ij ij iCV w w t L CV inA A
Table 7. Values of Wni and Wnj
element no. joint i, j wsi wsj CV (in.2) Wni Wnj
1(i) 000.000 -164.17901
2(j) 164.179164.179
0
2(i) 164.179 002
3(j) 164.179164.179
0
3(i) 164.179 003
4(j) 210.221164.179
-46.042
4(i) 210.221 0-46.04204
5(j) 207.407164.179
-43.228
5(i) 207.407 0-43.22805
6(j) 217.097164.179
-52.918
6(i) 217.097 0-52.91806
7(j) 240.057164.179
-75.878
8(i) 328.357 -164.17907
2(j) 164.179164.179
0
9(i) 118.136 -046.04208
3(j) 164.179164.179
0
10(i) 120.950 -043.22809
9(j) 118.136164.179
-46.045
11(i) 111.261 -052.91810
10(j) 120.950164.179
-43.228
12(i) 088.301 -075.87811
11(j) 111.261164.179
-52.918
-
into the formula of warping constant (Eqs. 7, 7.a, 7.b,
and 7.c) and
Therefore, the warping constant of the built-up sec-
tion equal to 132128 in.6.
6. Warping Constant of Australian Crane
Runway Girder
The following equation for warping constant is pro-
vided by the Australian Institute of Steel Construction
[7] for the calculation of rolled crane runway beam. (re-
fer to Figure 2)
(8)
where
h = D (Te Tb) / 2 (8.a)
Te = Ac / dc (8.b)
where Iyt the moment of inertia of top flange about
y-axis, Iyb the moment of inertia of bottom flange about
y-axis, D the depth of the beam, Te the effective thick-
ness of top flange, Tb the thickness of bottom flange, Ac
the area of channel, and dc the depth of channel.
The Cw value for the Australian Built-up Section of
Crane Runway beam is calculated by using the above
formula (Equation 8) is given as follows.
Iyt = Ai xi2 + Iyy
= 2(15 1.6)(20.8)2 + 2 (1/12) 15 1.63
+ (1/12) 2 403 = 31.443 103 cm4
Iyb = 1.6 (30)3 / 12 = 3.6 103 cm4
Ac = 40 2 + 2 15 1.6 = 128 cm2
Te = Ac / dc = 128 / 43.2 = 2.96 cm
h = D (Te Tb) / 2 = 120 (2.96 + 1.6) / 2
= 117.72 cm
388 Wei T. Hsu et al.
Table 8. Calculation for warping constant of built-up WC section
element no. tij Lij joint i, j Wni Wnj2
niW Wni Wnj2
njW C(w)i
1(i) -164.17901 5.629
2(j) 026954.70 0 0 50576
2(i) 002 21.9440
3(j) 00 0 0 0
3(i) 003 8.024
4(j) -46.0420 0 2119.9 5670
4(i) 0-46.04204 0
5(j) -43.2282119.9 1990.3 1868.7 0
5(i) 0-43.22805 0.475
6(j) -52.9181868.7 2287.5 2800.3 1101
6(i) 0-52.91806 2.080
7(j) -75.8782800.3 4015.3 5757.5 8717
8(i) -164.17907 5.629
2(j) 026954.70 0 0 505760
9(i) 0-46.04208 8.024
3(j) 02119.9 0 0 5670
10(i) 0-43.22809 0
9(j) -46.0451868.7 1990.4 2120.1 0
11(i) 0-52.91810 0.475
10(j) -43.2282800.3 2287.5 1868.7 1101
12(i) 0-75.87811 2.080
11(j) -52.9185757.5 4015.3 2800.3 8717
Warping Constant (Cw) = 132128 in.6
-
Cw = (h2
Iyt Iyb) / (Iyt + Iyb) = (117.722
31.443
103 36.0 102) / (31.443 103 + 3.6 103)
= 44763672 cm6
The Cw value evaluated using the proposed steps speci-
fied in this study is equal to 132128 in.6 = 46366900
cm6. The difference is 3.45% and its calculation is gi-
ven by (44763672 46366900) / 46366900 = -3.45%.
It can be concluded that the accuracy of the evalu-
ated Cw is quite compatible. with the Australian rolled
section of crane runway girder.
7. Conclusion
This research summarizes the integration formulas
and the formulas in terms of numerical expressions for
crane runway girders made of WC or SC sections.
1. This research gives all warping constant values of
listed sections in the AISC design manuals (ASD and
LRFD). The warping constants evaluated using the pro-
posed steps in this study.
2. The accuracy of computer-assisted results is com-
pared with the Australian built-up section of crane
runway girder and the result is quite compatible.
3. This research provides a better evaluation for the WC
or SC sections when involve the warping constants of
section.
References
[1] AISC, Allowable Stress Design Manual of Steel Con-
struction, 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Con-
struction, Chicago, Illinois (1989).
[2] AISC, Load and Resistance Factor Design Manual of
Steel Construction, 2nd Edition, American Institute
Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois (1993).
[3] AISC, Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifica-
tion for Structural Steel Buildings, 3rd Edition, Ameri-
can Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illi-
nois (1999).
[4] AISC, Design Specification for Structural Steel Build-
ings, 13th edition, American Institute of Steel Const-
ruction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois (2005).
[5] Galambos, T. V., Structural Members and Frames,
Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 2753
(1968).
[6] Heins, C. P., Bending and Torsional Design in Struc-
tural Members, D. C. Heath Co., pp. 580 (1969).
[7] AISC, Crane Runway Girders, Australian Institute of
Steel Construction, Milsons Point, NSW, Australia,
pp. 4547 (1983).
Manuscript Received: Jul. 3, 2008
Accepted: Mar. 5, 2009
Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders 389