Caesar Dimpleless Bal N=10 N=14
1
Results Photo Generated by Author Graph 1- Shows the mean distance +/- standard deviations when compared to dimple number. As dimple number increased distance increased as well. Statistical analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R= .9642 Graph 2- Shows how dimple configuration effects mean distance +/- standard deviations. Dimpleless reported a significantly lower distance while none of the other dimpled patterns were significantly different. Statistical analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R = 0.9457 Graph 3- Shows the effect of dimple number on mean drag force +/- standard deviations. As dimple number increased the drag force decreased. Statistical Analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R= .9367 C orrelation Betw een D im ple N um berand D rag Force 138.396 140.008 105.969 165.812 R 2 = 0.8779 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 336 392 432 Dim ple N um ber D rag Force Graph 4- Shows how dimple configuration effects mean drag force +/- standard deviations. The smooth configuration had the least amount of drag, while the other patterns were significantly different. Statistical Analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was no significant correlation. R =.459 Correlation Between Dim ple C onfiguration and D rag Force 165.812 141.629 156.862 125.2655 R 2 = 0.2107 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Dimple-less Steep Smooth H exx Dim ple C onfiguration Drag Force Correlation Between Distance and Dim ple C onfiguration 108.0454 166.3305 162.0598 167.6 R 2 = 0.8943 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Dimple-less Steep Smooth H exx Dim ple C onfiguration Distance (yds) Methodology Correlation Between Distance and Dim ple N um ber 162.5529 163.718 164.5754 108.045 R 2 = 0.9297 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 336 392 432 Dim ple N um ber Distance (yds) Graph 1 Graph 2 Graph 3 Graph 4 http://eng.monash.edu.au/uicee/ worldtransactions/ WordTransAbstractsVol5No3/23_NjockLibii15.pdf Libii, 2005
-
Upload
jeremy-pitts -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
3
description
Methodology. Nike One Platinum 336 Dimples Smooth N=10 N=11. TitlelistPro V1x 336 Dimples Smooth N=10 N=10. Calloway Big Bertha 336 Dimples Hexx N=10 N=12. Precept Laddie 392 Dimples Steep N=10 N=14. Nike TA2-LNG 392 Dimples Steep N=10 N=10. Titlelist N-X-T - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Caesar Dimpleless Bal N=10 N=14
Results
Photo Generated by Author
Graph 1- Shows the mean distance +/- standard deviations when compared to dimple number. As dimple number increased distance increased as well. Statistical analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R= .9642
Graph 2- Shows how dimple configuration effects mean distance +/- standard deviations. Dimpleless reported a significantly lower distance while none of the other dimpled patterns were significantly different. Statistical analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R = 0.9457
Graph 3- Shows the effect of dimple number on mean drag force +/- standard deviations. As dimple number increased the drag force decreased. Statistical Analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R= .9367
Correlation Between Dimple Number and Drag Force
138.396 140.008
105.969
165.812
R2 = 0.8779
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 336 392 432
Dimple Number
Dra
g F
orc
e
Graph 4- Shows how dimple configuration effects mean drag force +/- standard deviations. The smooth configuration had the least amount of drag, while the other patterns were significantly different. Statistical Analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was no significant correlation. R =.459
Correlation Between Dimple Configuration and Drag Force
165.812141.629
156.862125.2655
R2 = 0.2107
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Dimple-less Steep Smooth Hexx
Dimple Configuration
Drag
For
ce
Correlation Between Distance and Dimple Configuration
108.0454
166.3305162.0598
167.6
R2 = 0.8943
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Dimple-less Steep Smooth Hexx
Dimple Configuration
Dis
tanc
e (y
ds)
Methodology
Correlation Between Distance and Dimple Number
162.5529163.718
164.5754
108.045
R2 = 0.9297
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 336 392 432
Dimple Number
Dis
tanc
e (y
ds)
Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3
Graph 4
http://eng.monash.edu.au/uicee/worldtransactions/
WordTransAbstractsVol5No3/23_NjockLibii15.pdf
Libii, 2005
