Cache Memory

29
Cache Memory

description

Cache Memory. 3. System Bus. 3.1. Computer Components :. CPU. Memory. 0. IR. MAR. Instruction. 1. Instruction. 2. MBR. PC. Instruction. I/O AR. I/O BR. Data. I/O Module. Data. Data. n. Buffers. Weaknesses of Main Memory technology. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cache Memory

Page 1: Cache Memory

Cache Memory

Page 2: Cache Memory

3. System Bus

3.1. Computer Components :

MAR

MBR

I/O AR

I/O BR

CPU Memory

I/O Module

Buffers

0

1

2

n

InstructionInstruction

Instruction

...

...DataData

Data

IR

PC

Page 3: Cache Memory

Weaknesses of Main Memory technology

• The access time is relatively (very) slow compared to CPU access time

• CPU has to wait for so many cycles before the information from memory (READ) could arrive in CPU (CPU generally 40 to 50 times faster than main memory)

Page 4: Cache Memory

Why Cache?

• Small “chunk” of memory with “very fast” cycle time (possibly 8-10 times faster than main memory cycle time)

• Holds “the most needed” information (by the CPU)• It is expected that, more than 80% of CPU access

will go to cache, instead of main memory• Overall access time from memory will be faster

Page 5: Cache Memory

Processor-Memory connection: The Cache Memory

ALU1 ALU2

ALU3

ADDER

BUS

R1

R2

R3

ControlUnit

PC

MBR

MAR

IR

CacheMemory

(256-2048 KB)

MainMemory

(0.5-4GB)

40-60 nanosecondcycle time

5-10 nanosecondcycle time

Faster access to/fromcache memory, reduces CPU wait time.Smaller Cache size, lead to problems

Page 6: Cache Memory

Cache Memory: What are going to talk about ?

• We are not discussing the technology• But we are going the discuss about the reason behind

cache implementation :minimizing the CPU idle time

• Also, we are going to discuss about cache :mapping algorithmsreplacement algorithms

Page 7: Cache Memory

Memory Hierarchy - Diagram

Page 8: Cache Memory

Hierarchy ListFrom fastest to slowest access time :

• Registers• L1 Cache• L2 Cache• Main memory• Disk cache• Disk• Optical• Tape

Page 9: Cache Memory

Locality of Reference principlesProgram execution behavior :• During the course of the execution of a program, memory

references tend to cluster• What is a program :

“a set instructions to command the computer to work, to perform something”

loop MOV R1,AADD R2,R1…..

ADD A,R5DEC R3BNZ loop……

Page 10: Cache Memory

Cache• Small amount of fast memory• Sits between normal main memory and CPU• May be located on CPU chip or module• To store temporarily, the most wanted

program/instruction to be executed (by the CPU)

Loop MOV R1,AADD R2,R1……….DEC R3MPY A,R3BNZ loop……

Page 11: Cache Memory

So you want fast?• It is possible to build a computer which

uses only static RAM (see later)• This would be very fast• This would need no cache• This would cost a very large amount

Page 12: Cache Memory

Cache operation - overview

• CPU requests contents of a memory location

• Check cache memory for this data• If present, get from cache (fast)• If not present, read required block

from main memory to cache• Then deliver from cache to CPU• Cache includes tags to identify which

block of main memory is in each cache slot

Page 13: Cache Memory

Cache Design parameters• Size, how big is the size

(cost and effectiveness)• Mapping Function

(how do we place data in cache)• Replacement Algorithm

(how do we replace data in cache by new data)• Write Policy

(how do we update data in cache)• Block Size

(reflects the access unit of data in cache)• Number of Caches

(how many level oc caches we need : L2 or L3?)

Page 14: Cache Memory

Size does matter• Cost

—More cache is expensive(since cache memory is made of static RAM)

• Speed—More cache is faster (up to a point)—Checking cache for data takes time

(correlated to mapping function)

Page 15: Cache Memory

Typical Cache Organization - continued

Page 16: Cache Memory

Cache Mapping

• Direct• Associative• Set Associative

Page 17: Cache Memory

0

m

2m

3m

4m

5m

6m

Main Memory

CacheLine Number Tag 0 1 2

(C-1)

Block (K words)

Block Length( K words)

Cache Mapping : Direct

Page 18: Cache Memory

Direct Mapping Cache Line Table

• Cache line Main Memory blocks held

• 0 0, m, 2m, 3m…2s-m• 1 1,m+1, 2m+1…2s-m+1

• m-1 m-1, 2m-1, 3m-1…2s-1

Page 19: Cache Memory

Direct Mapping Pros & Cons

• Simple• Inexpensive• Fixed location for given block

—If a program accesses 2 blocks that map to the same line repeatedly, cache misses are very high

Page 20: Cache Memory

Associative Mapping

• A main memory block can load into any line of cache

• Cache searching gets expensive

Page 21: Cache Memory

Cache Mapping :Fully Associative

Page 22: Cache Memory

Set Associative Mapping

• Cache is divided into a number of sets• Each set contains a number of lines• A given block maps to any line in a given

set—e.g. Block B can be in any line of set i

• e.g. 2 lines per set—2 way associative mapping—A given block can be in one of 2 lines in only

one set

Page 23: Cache Memory

Cache Mapping :Set Associative (2 way)

Page 24: Cache Memory

Replacement Algorithms (2)Associative & Set Associative

• Hardware implemented algorithm (speed)• Least Recently used (LRU)• e.g. in 2 way set associative

—Which of the 2 block is lru?• First in first out (FIFO)

—replace block that has been in cache longest• Least frequently used

—replace block which has had fewest hits• Random

Page 25: Cache Memory

Write Policy

• Write through• Write back

Page 26: Cache Memory

Write through

• All writes go to main memory as well as cache

• Multiple CPUs can monitor main memory traffic to keep local (to CPU) cache up to date

• Lots of traffic• Slows down writes• Remember bogus write through caches!

Page 27: Cache Memory

Write back

• Updates initially made in cache only• Update bit for cache slot is set when

update occurs• If block is to be replaced, write to main

memory only if update bit is set• N.B. 15% of memory references are writes

Page 28: Cache Memory

Replacement Algorithms1. FIFO : First In First Out2. LIFO : Last In First Out3. LRU : Least Recently Used

Page 29: Cache Memory

Comparison of Cache Sizes