C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis > 18 years...
-
Upload
neil-daniels -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis > 18 years...
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
> 18 yearsChronic HCV infection
Genotype 1 or 3Treatment-naïve
Cirrhosis assessed by liver biopsy or noninvasive testsNo HBV or HIV co-infection
GZR/EBR + SOF
GZR/EBR + SOF
GZR/EBR + SOF
GZR/EBR + SOF
GZR/EBR + SOF
GZR/EBR + SOF
GZR/EBR + SOF
W4 W6 W8 W12Randomisation
1 : 1Open-label
Cirrhosis
No randomisationOpen-label
Cirrhosis
No cirrhosis
No cirrhosis
N = 15
N = 31
N = 30
N = 20
N = 21
N = 12
N = 14
SVR12GZR/EBR 100/50 mg QD ; SOF 400 mg QD
Objective– SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/ml), with 95% CI, by ITT
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006
Genotype 1
Genotype 3
Design
C-SWIFT
Genotype 1 Genotype 3
No cirrhosis Cirrhosis No cirrhosis Cirrhosis4 weeksN = 31
6 weeksN = 30
6 weeksN = 20
8 weeksN = 21
8 weeksN = 15
12 weeksN = 14
12 weeksN = 12
Mean age, years 52 51 56 57 51 42 55
Female 35% 37% 35% 38% 27% 43% 17%
Race, white 97% 93% 100% 100% 95% 100% 100%
IL28B CC 36% 27% 30% 24% 40% 21% 50%
Genotype1a1b
84%16%
87%13%
80%20%
76%24%
- - -
Cirrhosis, N (%) 0 0 20 (100) 21 (100) 0 0 12 (100)
HCV RNA x 106 IU/ml, mean
3.69 3.09 1.66 2.37 3.29 2.57 2.26
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT
Baseline characteristics
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/ml), mITT, Genotype 1
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT
33
8780
94
4 weeks0
201
6 weeks040
6 weeks040
8 weeks013
BreakthroughRelapseNon virologic failure
30 30 20 200
20
40
60
80
100%
Non-cirrhotic Cirrhotic
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/ml), mITT, Genotype 3 Non-cirrhotic Cirrhotic
93100
91
0
20
40
60
80
100
8 weeks010
12 weeks000
12 weeks011
BreakthroughRelapseEarly discontinuation
15 14 11
%
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/ml), per-protocol, Genotype 3, by subgroups
95 100
85
9791 93 100 93 96
0
20
40
60
80
100
All patients < 2 MIU/ml
> 2 MIU/ml
No cirrhosis Cirrhosis Male Female CC Non-CC
40 27 13 29 11 28 12 14 26
Baseline HCV RNA Gender IL28B genotype
%
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT
NS3 RAV NS5A RAV NS5B RAV
Genotype 1 (29 relapses) 56
No resistance-associated variants 28/29 (97%) 18/30 (60%) 30/30
(100%)
Pre-existing baseline RAVs only 0 1 (3%) 0
RAVS detected at failure 1 (3%) 9 (30%)4/9 in 4W arm 0
RAVs at failure in addition of baseline RAVs 0 2 (7%) 0
Genotype 3 (2 relapses)
At baseline Q168Q/R 0 0
At relapse Q168R Y93H 0
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
Resistance analysis at failure
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
All patients
Genotype 1 Genotype 3
Non cirrhotic4 & 6 weeks
N = 61
Cirrhotic6 & 8 weeks
N = 41
Non cirrhotic8 & 12 weeks
N = 29
Cirrhotic12 weeks
N = 12
Discontinuation due to AE 1 (1) 0 1 (2) 0 0
Serious adverse event 2 (2) 0 2 (5) 0 0
Death 0 0 0 0 0
Most common AEs
Headache
Fatigue
Nausea
4 (4)
2 (2)2 (2)
1 (2)
2 (3)2 (3)
2 (7)
0
1 (2)
1 (3)
0
1 (3)
1 (8)
1 (8)
1 (8)
Hemoglobin < 10 g/dl 0 0 0 0
Total bilirubin > 5 x baseline 0 0 0 0 0
ALT/AST > 5 x ULN 0 0 0 0 0
Adverse events, N (%)
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT
C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis
Summary
– Grazoprevir/elbasvir + sofosbuvir was able to shorten treatment duration to 8 weeks or less among cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic HCV genotype 1 infected patients
– Genotype 3 patients achieved high SVR12 rates with 8-12 weeks of therapy, including patients with cirrhosis
– All virologic failures were due to relapse– Patients relapsed most commonly with either wild-type virus or
with RAVs already present at baseline– GZR/EBR + SOF was generally safe and well tolerated
Poordad F. EASL 2015, Abs. O006C-SWIFT