COVER STORY

Volunteers Against Pollution

STEVEN K. GIBB, C&EN WASHINGTON; PHOTOGRAPHS BY JAMES KEGLEY

Citizen scientists partner with government agencies and collect data to drive environmental policy

Interns check water and weather data at Church Creek near Annapolis, Md.

13CEN.ACS.ORG SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

The boat crew huddles over the stagnant murk of Broad Creek on a hot summer morning. Plant debris and foam float on the second-most polluted tributary of Maryland’s South River, which feeds into

the Chesapeake Bay. The skiff slows and drops anchor. The captain does a quick check on her position then orders the crew to haul up the anchor and reposition the boat.

The craft is 8 feet from the spot where the volunteers have been taking water quality measurements for years. The sampling protocols are clear: The boat must anchor in that same spot, nowhere else.

The team of staff scientists and vol-unteers know that to gather high-quality information on the water column, being spot-on with their GPS coordinates for this location in the creek is essential to main-tain the trust of state agencies that accept their data.

Broad Creek is polluted with high levels of ammonia and bacteria and has low con-centrations of dissolved oxygen in summer. These conditions need to be addressed by state conservation managers to improve water quality as the South River Federation (SRF) pursues restoration work in the creek.

Many environmental conservation groups across the U.S. field what they call “stream teams” or “creek geeks.” They have staff members trained in the chemical sciences accompany community volun-teers to explore waterbodies as part of their environmental education programs.

But just south of the historic port city of Annapolis, Md., SRF’s citizen science program has taken such efforts to a new level. This effort has the potential to lead to regulations that slash pollution by sup-plying the state government with water quality data.

With the oversight of professional scien-tists, the volunteers have collected precise and consistent data for eight years, which includes water samples taken before, dur-ing, and after storms.

The captain’s decision to reposition the skiff is evidence of this, as precise GPS co-ordinates guide each monitoring effort they make, says Chris Gordon, who lives near the South River and has volunteered with SRF for five years. The foundation calls him when weather conditions are too rough for

other citizen scientists. “Chris and the oth-er volunteers are integral to our program,” says SRF Executive Director Kate Fritz.

Because SRF emphasizes training and quality control, the reliability and validity of its chemical and physical parameters data are considered robust. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), a regulatory agency, uses SRF’s data as it pre-pares reports about the level of pollution in water bodies in the state.

At each monitoring station, SRF volun-teers lower a Hydrolab DS5 probe to collect information on pH levels, conductivity, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and blue-green algae populations at different depths. The measurements of the blue-green algae are taken as early warnings of the possible for-mation of algal blooms—red, orange, and other colors—what Fritz calls “a veritable rainbow of nastiness.”

SRF shelled out $15,000 for the Hydro-lab instrument, a significant chunk of mon-ey for a local environmental group with seven paid staff members. But the instru-

ment has a precision and reliability that buttresses others’ confidence in the water quality data the organization collects.

In their fieldwork, citizen scientists often use a mix of old and new technology. Many water quality monitoring teams use both high-tech sensors and a simple Sec-chi disk, 8 inches in diameter, its quarters painted alternately black and white. The disk, an instrument used to measure water clarity for more than a century, is lowered off the shady side of a boat into the water until the two colors aren’t distinguish-able to the observer’s eye. Data collectors then measure the depth at which the disk’s colors disappear. This provides data about turbidity, which includes sediment sus-pended in the water.

Chesapeake Bay restoration experts have set a goal of cleaning up the estu-ary and its tributaries so they have clarity to 6 feet—the optimal depth below the surface at which sea grass can absorb sun-light and provide habitat for water-filtering oysters to nestle in.

But Broad Creek doesn’t come close to that 6-foot level of clarity. The turbidity of its waters varies between 3 and 4 feet, depending on precipitation, pollutant con-centrations, and changes in wind speed and direction.

IN THE EARLY 2000S, SRF mobilized volunteers to conduct water monitoring off docks adjoining their private property along the South River. Diana Muller, a chemist who had worked for Old Dominion University and SGS Testing & Control Ser-vices, served as the South Riverkeeper at the time. She found that the dock sampling effort generated data with too many outli-ers and discrepancies. She led the switch to monitor the water from a skiff at multiple sites on the South River.

SRF itself was created in 1999 by a loose-knit group of concerned residents watch-ing the health of the river deteriorate. They banded together to form a Riverkeeper organization, which is part of the broader Waterkeeper Alliance network—a coalition of local environmental groups that keep an eye on fish kills, water quality, compliance with permits that limit soil erosion and runoff from construction sites, and other immediate local concerns.

After years of careful examination and review of SRF’s data collection, scien-tists at MDE and its sister state agency, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), have come to trust the volunteer-

AnnapolisMARYLAND

Virginia

Broad Creek

Church Creek

Church Creek monitoring station

Beards Creek

Water quality monitoring locations

Map area

WATERSHED Citizen scientists collect water quality data in several spots on Maryland’s South River.

14CEN.ACS.ORG SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

MORE ONLINE

SRF Intern Rachel Denby prepares to lower a Hydrolab DS5, a water

quality monitoring instrument, to collect information on pH levels, conductivity,

salinity, dissolved oxygen, and blue-green algae at different depths.

As part of the restoration of Church Creek, monitoring devices sample water every 20 minutes.

Citizen scientists begin a day of water data collection on the South River near Annapolis, Md.

Citizen scientists keep manual and digital records of Chesapeake Bay conditions, including weather at monitoring sites.

Sophisticated equipment such as this Hydrolab DS5 probe is also used by Maryland natural resource agencies for water quality measurements.

SRF interns hike a quarter of a mile

to a Church Creek restoration site

monitoring station. SRF is coordinating

a unique restoration project on Church

Creek. Most similar projects’ focus is

on headwaters, but Church Creek’s are

mall parking lots.

COVER STORY

▶

▼

◀

◀

▲

▲

Garnering DataC&EN Senior Editor Steven Gibb and photographer James Kegley accompanied South River Federation citizen scientists for two days as they collected water quality information in the river and its freshwater tributaries. One set of monitoring information was collected from a skiff and a second set from the banks of creeks that the volunteer organization is restoring.

Follow the citizen scientists as they collect water quality monitoring information on the Chesapeake Bay’s South River near the historic town of Annapolis, Md.

15CEN.ACS.ORG SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

Wildlife, including this great blue heron, has returned to a restoration site that the South River Federation rehabilitated.

South River Federation staff, citizen scientists, and interns evaluate data recorded by water quality monitors.

Secchi disks have been used for more than a century to measure water clarity.

Interns Chelsea Diedrich and Rachel Denby conduct water quality monitoring on Church Creek, the most polluted tributary to the South River near Annapolis, Md.

Freshwater quality monitors such as this YSI Professional Plus are used for nontidal waterways in and around the South River, a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay.

Rigorous citizen science requires precise GPS locations to ensure

consistent monitoring information.

The South River Federation collects weather and water quality data at each monitoring station for analysis and evaluation.

At each monitoring location, meteorological information is gathered to help explain anomalies and data outliers.

COVER STORY

▼

▼

▲

▲

▲▲

◀

▲

16CEN.ACS.ORG SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

COVER STORY

collected data. The environmental group files rigorous data quality plans with envi-ronmental regulators, coordinates scien-tific protocols with the natural resources agency during field visits, and provides training to volunteers. In doing so, SRF expands the scientific evidence avail-able to natural resource managers on the Chesapeake Bay’s South River, according to state officials.

Maryland agencies have only one water quality monitoring location on the South River’s 10 square miles of surface. SRF con-tributes water quality data on more than 21 spots on the tidal river and its tributaries. The group gathers, checks, and archives chemical and physical information col-lected during the past 10 years.

Gordon, the SRF citizen scientist, says, “The trained volunteers free up science staff from field collection duties to analyze data trends, craft reports, catch outliers, and provide more quality control.”

Volunteer Coordinator Nancy Merrill says SRF is first concerned with “stopping the bleeding” of pressing environmental concerns such as fish kills on the river. But

the group maintains that longer-range monitoring programs strengthen regula-tors’ rationale for addressing long-standing concerns about nutrients and storm wa-ter that run into the South River from its watershed.

The nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus enter the bay and its tributaries mainly via sewage plants discharging treated water and fertilizer runoff from farm fields. These nutrients trigger the growth of algae that eventually die and decompose, lead-ing to the formation of summertime “dead zones” of low oxygen where fish and other marine life cannot live.

SRF has found that dead zones are not just limited to the deep middle of the Chesapeake Bay where oceangoing con-tainerships ply in and out of the Port of Baltimore. They can be found in shallower areas as well.

SRF’s data are unprecedented in quality and quantity for a small, local organiza-tion and provides for more accurate and evidence-based environmental and public health decisions, state scientists say. “The partnership with SRF works because the

data are just like the information our state DNR collects,” says Matt Stover with MDE.

Back on Broad Creek, SRF’s Merrill is satisfied that the large skiff is on the cor-rect GPS location. Next, citizen scientists drop the Hydrolab instrument with five sensors over the side into Broad Creek. Gordon says that after a rain, the water turns brown and oil, sediment, and trash wash down from the parking lots upstream of the waterway.

Citizen scientists and college-student interns gather data at various depths and record meteorological information at each site. This combination of high- and low-tech data collection is a mark of many citizen science group efforts and can help explain outliers or questionable data. “Sometimes the wind on a particular day combined with tidal flows can help us piece together unusual readings,” says intern Rachel Denby, an environmental science major at the University of Maryland, Bal-timore, who volunteered with SRF this summer.

MDE’s Stover underscores that volun-teerism of this kind can slash pollution.

17CEN.ACS.ORG SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

“Our partnership with SRF and other groups that use volunteers to collect water quality information allows us to receive additional data and advance our goals.” Information MDE receives—which also comes from academics, nongovernmental organizations, environmental groups, mu-nicipalities, and other nontraditional part-ners—amounts to a huge volume of data that, when combined, saves the agency time, effort, and resources, he says.

In particular, the SRF data helped the department compile a report in 2014 that is required by the Clean Water Act. The report examines what are called impair-ments—levels of pollution—in the state’s waterways and water bodies. The report will be used by regulators as they consider potential actions that may be needed to ad-dress this pollution.

“WE REQUIRE RIGOROUS methods and review, including quality-control plans that detail who, what, when, why, and how data are gathered,” Stover says. Maryland DNR’s Sherm Garrison confirms this and regularly carries out “field audits” with SRF and other citizen scientists to ensure con-sistent scientific protocols are followed. “SRF uses the same instruments we do,” he says. The state offers assistance in instanc-es when volunteers collect “outlier data,” such as when a dissolved oxygen sensor gives an unusual reading—for example, an irrational 105%—so that this sort of infor-mation is treated consistently, he says.

One key regulatory development that has attracted controversy and litigation has been setting caps on the amount of various pollutants tolerated in water bodies. Regu-lators call them total maximum daily loads or TMDLs.

After state and federal environmental agencies prevailed in a court challenge brought by the agricultural sector over the TMDLs, the agencies set Chesapeake Bay watershed limits of 185.9 million lb of nitrogen, 12.5 million lb of phosphorus, and 6.45 billion lb of sediment per year. These values represent a 25% reduction in nitro-gen, 24% reduction in phosphorus, and 20% reduction in sediment compared with 2009 levels. According to MDE spokesman Jay Apperson, “The Chesapeake Bay Pro-gram Partnership anticipates using SRF’s and other groups’ data to a greater degree in the future to help refine TMDL analy-ses.” The TMDLs are effective now, and implementation planning is ongoing.

“Access to a lot of high-quality data”

helps the state promote these protections, Stover of MDE says. “Some stakeholders were surprised we wanted to work with the South River Federation, but it’s been a very positive experience from our vantage point.”

Although more expensive monitoring of individual chemical contaminants and hydrocarbons is beyond the capability

of many volunteer groups and even state agencies, such data would also be valuable to regulators, Stover says.

Back on the skiff in the South River, SRF volunteers steer around the river’s nooks and crannies. Come rain or snow or sun-shine, they can be found anchoring at pre-cisely the same spots and collecting infor-mation that Maryland regulators value. ◾

For over 50 years TA has consistently

improved thermal analysis

technology, manufacturing,

and quality. Standing behind

our cells and furnaces for

5 years is no big deal.

5years.tainstruments.com

TA thermal analysis systems consistently

produce the fattest baselines, the sharpest

peaks and the highest sensitivity. Now, from the

World Leader in Thermal Analysis, the only

5-year warranty on cells and furnaces.

Q500 TGA 1000 °C

Q800 DMA

-150 °C to 600 °C

Q400 TMA

-150 °C to 1000 °C

Q600 SDT 1500°C

Q Series DSC -180 °C to 725 °C