Business and the Arts The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006 May 24, 2006 The Case for...
-
Upload
jeremy-wilkinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Business and the Arts The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006 May 24, 2006 The Case for...
Business and the Arts
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
May 24, 2006
The Case for Investment in the Arts
Billie Bridgman
2
Real, substantial, economic impact
• Public sector investment in the arts and cultural community is essential. It is the catalyst for private sector support and together these drive direct, indirect and induced benefits.
• The arts in Canada provide an economic engine (based on public and private sector support, earned income and incremental tourism) which drives impact at as much as 8X the level of public sector investment.
• Because of these multiples, more than 80% of this public sector investment comes back to government in the form of taxes.
• The maximum impact is generated at the induced level - the real beneficiaries of cultural investment are Canadian communities.
The Council for Business and the Arts, in conjunction with McKinsey and Company, recently completed a research and analysis project around the the partnership potential between the corporate sector and the arts. The simplest measurement is economic and the assumption was that this would be key to corporate interest. The model developed by the study team indicates a number of important features at this level:
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
3
Description
Examples
• Financial benefits generated by the attraction/event itself
• Incremental tourist spend
• Regional revitalization – economic activity from direct and indirect spending
• Real, but qualitative benefits for the community, government, and corporations
Type of benefit
Easy to quantify Unable to quantifyHarder to quantify
• Admission/tickets• Tax revenues
• Restaurants• Hotels• Services
• Incremental spend in region due to direct arts spending (i.e., ripple effect of direct benefits)
• Social capital, education, reputation, multicultural, support of objectives
• Talent attraction, CSR, marketing
Direct Indirect Induced Intangible
Source: McKinsey team analysis
A framework for calculating the economic impact of the arts and culture sector in Canada
4
0.9
4.2
4.6
4.8Visit museum/art gallery
Attend a fair, festival, etc.
Attend a play, concert, or other cultural event
Attend an aboriginal or native cultural event
*Visitors may attend multiple events during their trip, based on domestic travel within Canada**Underlying assumption that approx. 25% of those tourists who attended an arts attraction traveled solely for the event
Source: Canadian Travel Survey, 2002; Statistics Canada, 2004; team analysis
Participation in arts/cultural eventsPercent of tourists who attend*
% of tourism spend attributed to the arts 0.5% 2.5%1.25%**
Estimated arts-related tourism spend($ Million)
287.5 1,437.5718.8
17%
38%
7%
15%
24%
Total tourism spend in Canada, 2004100% = $57.5 billion
Transportation
Accommodation
Food/beverages
Recreation/entertainment
Other
As a conservative estimate, $0.7 billion of the tourism spend in Canada can be considered an indirect benefit of cultural programs
5
Assumptions
• 38% of firms’ spend is on supplies
• 42% of firms’ spend is on wages • 80% of wages are disposable
income• 86% of disposable income is
spent
Induced spend calculation
1
1 – 0.38 – 0.29
Direct arts spend Spend on
wages
Other spend
38%
42%
20%
Disposable income
Taxes
Spend on supplies
Personal savings
80%
20%
86%
14%
Personal spending
= 2.0 X ($206 + $215 + $7)
= $856 million
Source: CBAC Annual Survey of Performing Arts Organizations, 2003-2004; CBAC Annual Survey of Public Museums & Art Galleries, 2003-2004; Statistics Canada; team analysis
Multiplier effect of arts spending in Canada
- 1 X direct spend
2/3 of the direct arts spend is ‘rippled’ through the Canadian economy
= 29%
Rationale
• Arts-related revenue causes incremental economic activity amounting to 2/3 of the original benefit
• This sparks a ‘ripple effect’ in the economy – total induced benefit multiplies to 2/3 of the 2/3 of the 2/3, etc.
Induced benefits are estimated to be $856 million based on the ‘multiplier effect’ of arts-related spending
6
Public/Private Arts Investment$ millions, 2004
Sources: McKinsey analysis; 143 organizations from CBAC Annual Survey of Performing Arts (approx. 1% of total arts organizations in Canada), 2004-2005; Hill Strategies Research Inc., 2003; Canadian Travel Survey 2002; Team analysis
Economic Impact: return on investment for 143 performing arts companies
101215
DirectBenefits – tickets, etc.
Total public/private funding
105
PrivateFunding
PublicFunding
2067
856
Indirect benefits
Total benefits
1.284
Induced benefits
Multiplier effect – estimated to be 2X all spending attributed to the arts (i.e., spending by arts institutions and tourist spending)
Multiplier effect – estimated to be 2X all spending attributed to the arts (i.e., spending by arts institutions and tourist spending)
Assuming 1.25% of tourism is attributable to the arts and that 1% of that can be tied to this sample.Assuming 1.25% of tourism is attributable to the arts and that 1% of that can be tied to this sample.
Quantified Economic Impact of Investment$ millions
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
7
All the reasons: economic impact is the bonus
But, the most important outcome of the study didn’t have an economic basis.
While corporate leaders found the numbers impressive, they all recognized that the real “return on investment” from culture is not monetary. It is not the reason we make art and it is not the reason we need art in our lives
Our art makes us unique, it records our lives, it provides forum for debate, it improves education, creates community engagement, drives national brand identity, encourages multicultural expression
Art facilitates neighbourhood regeneration, attracts creative employees, creates employee engagement and provides unique corporate marketing opportunities
Public/private arts partnerships provide the financial foundation for creativity which in turn generates unique social, community and corporate value.
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
8
For business
1. A way to address an increasingly important “Corporate Social Responsibility”
2. Reinforces a creative and attractive Corporate Culture
3. Promotes Community development and engagement
4. Provides unique opportunities to market to Customers
For society
1. Allows Canadians to express, share and recognise their identities – building social capital and community engagement and supporting multiculturalism
2. Helps to create a distinct ‘brand identity’ for Canada
3. Enhances the attractiveness of Canada to valuable talent
4. Strengthens the education system
Qualitative benefits of arts support
… and allows businesses to align with the interests of key stakeholders: employees and customers
An investment in the arts provides significant benefits to society…
While economic impact is quantifiable, the real value of the arts lies in their social, community and partner benefits
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
9
The Best Partnerships between Business and the Arts are based on:
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
•Mutual respect
•Real engagement
•Real co-operative programs/projects – not just cheque in / check out.
•It is not about doing favours, it can’t be about “asking”
•It only works if there is a real value proposition on both sides and if both partners understand each other’s equal – though very different - value
10
For Business, partnerships with the arts are:
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
•Comparatively reasonably priced
•Offer the gamut of experiences and images with which to create brand association – from traditional to very innovative
•Targeted opportunities
•Niche market – high-touch environment, not impersonal
•Very useful to influence groups of important connections: politicians, business leaders, clients, community leaders, press
•Associated with quality
•Allow layers of participation which build on each other – offer opportunities for adding other specifically targeted associated initiatives
•Association with the arts communicates creativity, forward thinking, innovation – very closely associated with “creative city”, knowledge worker corporate concerns
11
Business can be Proactive
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006
Go after what you want
Define where your needs are: objectives, issues, new business initiatives
Define each target group: who do you want to meet, how, how often, where
What image do you want to project: innovative / creative, refined, top quality, luxury, on the edge
Develop arts associations which address specific needs / target groups / marketing images
Work with the organization to develop ideas – the sponsorship $ is just the ticket to the dance
Spend outside of the partnership commitment to support the initiative
Do fewer, more targeted
Make multi year commitments, build a campaign strategy, study results, recreate
Don’t ask the arts to be like business, use the arts for what they are and what they offer
Think big by keeping it small – define specific objectives (a few) and make sure that everything you do is on track with those – don’t let things creep, spread, lose focus
Involve many aspects of the company – derive benefit on many levels
Measure your success – through the usual measurement channels as applied to each aspect of the company
12
Recurring Messages From CEOs:
Engagement, Relationship, Partnership
1. Inspire me… with your creativity, energy and humanity
2. Help me find a proposition that my employees, communities and customers care about
3. Show me how we can be part of your success
4. Let us make a difference with a distinctive and committed contribution over several years
5. Let us have an Artistic experience together
The Council for Business and the Arts, May 2006