Burnt Store Road Phase 2 Utilities Route AnalysisJun 21, 2016 · Burnt Store Rd Utility Alignment...
Transcript of Burnt Store Road Phase 2 Utilities Route AnalysisJun 21, 2016 · Burnt Store Rd Utility Alignment...
Burnt Store Road ‐ Phase 2Utilities Route Analysis
Burnt Store Rd Phase 2 – Existing Alignment
Burnt Store Rd Phase 2 – Proposed Alignment
Burnt Store Rd Utility Alignment
Proposed Utility Corridor• 24‐inch Water Main• 16‐inch Water Main• 20‐inch Force Main• 16‐inch Reclaimed Main
Alignment Option #1Relative Construction Cost: $12,662,400Overall length: 24,190 feet
Pros• No Easements are required
Cons• Construction along US‐41• Likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension• Requires Burnt Store Road
Phase 2 Construction
Alignment Option #2Relative Construction Cost: $13,016,580Overall length: 24,745 feet
Pros• No construction along US‐41
Cons• Easements required• Likely to Conflict with Tuckers
grade extension• May require construction on
both sides of road• Requires Burnt Store Road
Phase 2 Construction
Alignment Option #3Relative Construction Cost: $12,491,160Overall length: 23,880 feet
Pros• No easements required
Cons• Likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension• Construction along US‐41• Requires Burnt Store Road
Phase 2 Construction
Alignment Option #4Relative Construction Cost: $11,656,518Overall length: 23,010 feet
Pros• Least expensive option• Shortest overall length
Cons• Easement required• Construction on both sides of
the road• Requires Burnt Store Road
Phase 2 Construction
Alignment Option #5Relative Construction Cost: $11,984,100Overall length: 22,055 feet
Pros• No construction along US‐41• Not likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension
Cons• Requires Burnt Store Road
Phase 2 Construction• Easements required
Alignment Option #6Relative Construction Cost: $12,907,200Overall length: 22,630 feet
Pros• No construction along US‐41• Not likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension• Utilities closer to the interchange
of Tuckers Grade
Cons• Requires Burnt Store Road
Phase 2 Construction• Easements required
Alignment Option #7Relative Construction Cost: $11,791,920Overall length: 21,540 feet
Pros• No construction along US‐41• Not likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension• Second least expensive option• Property owner is receptive to
easement acquisition
Cons• Several fittings along Green Gulf
Blvd. are required
Alignment Option #8 Relative Construction Cost: $12,904,680Overall length: 22,110 feetPros• No construction along US‐41• Not likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension• Utilities closer to the interchange
of Tuckers Grade• Property owner is receptive to
easement acquisitionCons• Not the least expensive
Items to Consider for Each Alignment
Relative Construction Cost• Relative construction cost are not opinions of probable cost
Constructability• Easement Acquisition• Overall Length• Construction on both sides of Pavement• Connections to System
Impacts • Demolition of Residential Driveways• Construction through Environmental Areas• Construction along US‐41• Likelihood of Conflicts with Tuckers Grade Extension
Expansion of Service • More centrally located within service area
Alignment Option #8 – PREFERRED ALIGNMENTRelative Construction Cost: $12,904,680Overall length: 22,110 feetPros• No construction along US‐41• Not likely to conflict with Tuckers
Grade extension• Utilities closer to the interchange
of Tuckers Grade• Property owner is receptive to
easement acquisitionCons• Not the least the expensive
Questions?