BTC Residence

137
BTC RESIDENCE domesticating the commercial periphery of Ljubljana

description

Domesticating the commercial periphery of Ljubljana. Koen Schaballie

Transcript of BTC Residence

  • BTC ResidenCedomesticating the commercial periphery

    of Ljubljana

  • STUDIO LJUBLJANA:

    BTC ResidenceDomesticating the Commercial Periphery of Ljubljana

    Koen Schaballie

    Thesis voorgedragen tot het behalenvan de graad van Master of Science

    in de ingenieurswetenschappen:architectuur

    Promotoren:Tom Thys

    Ward Verbakel

    Academiejaar 2013 2014

    Master of Science in de ingenieurswetenschappen: architectuur

  • 4 Copyright KU Leuven

    Without written permission of the

    promotors and the authors it is forbidden

    to reproduce or adapt in any form or by

    any means any part of this publication.

    Requests for obtaining the right to

    reproduce or utilize parts of this publication

    should be addressed to dept. Architecture,

    Kasteelpark Arenberg 1/2431, B-3001

    Leuven, +32-16-321361 or via e-mail to

    [email protected].

    A written permission of the promotor is

    also required to use the methods, products,

    schematics and programs described in this

    work for industrial or commercial use, and

    for submitting this publication in scientific

    contests.

    All images in this booklet are, unless

    credits are given, made or drawn by the

    authors (Studio Ljubljana).

  • 5DankwoordMijn oprechte dank gaat naar mijn twee promotoren Ward

    Verbakel en Tom Thys. Zij gingen met ons op weg, eerst op reis

    naar Lubljana en vervolgens op weg om mijn masterproef tot een

    goed einde te brengen. Hun enthousiasme en passie werkten

    aanstekelijk!

    Ook wil ik mijn medestudenten bedanken voor de fijne

    samenwerking en de ideen die we samen uitwerkten in de vele

    uren op de zolder in de molen.

    Tenslotte, dank ook aan allen die mij steunden bij het volbrengen

    van deze masterproef en mijn studies.: mijn ouders, Masha, mijn

    vriendin, mijn broers en zussen en allen die mij aanmoedigden of

    hier of daar logistieke steun gaven. Mama en Masha, zonder jullie

    had dit project er totaal anders uitgezien, bedankt voor alles!

    Koen Schaballie

  • 6Abstract (EN)The large-scale housing developments of today are mainly

    determined by economic powers. The result is usually a hyper

    individual architecture in which collective functions are minimized

    as much as possible, as they dont count as marketable floor

    area. In the Eastern periphery of Ljubljana, the biggest shopping

    & entertainment district of Slovenia is located, BTC. BTC is the

    thriving force behind an ambitious city development plan that will

    link the district with the historic city centre. A tram line will be

    constructed between the two, and a colossal park with a series

    of large scale housing developments will be erected along. While

    BTC could use a severe urban redevelopment itself, it seems that

    its nature will stay more or less the same and that it will continue

    expanding as a car-shopping-district. BTC Residence proves that

    there is an alternative for this status-quo and illustrates that BTC

    with all its urban facilities contains the potential to evolve into a

    vibrant neighbourhood for residents, shoppers and shopkeepers.

    In BTC Residence, a new type of living is imagined, which serves

    the several parties. BTC Residence stands as a powerful mark in

    the shopping fabric: it embraces the commercial infrastructure

    but will equally domesticate it.

  • 7Abstract (NL)Grote huisvestingsprojecten worden vandaag voornamelijk

    bepaald door de economische machthebbers. Het resultaat is

    doorgaans een hyperindividuele architectuur waarbij collectieve

    functies tot een minimum beperkt worden, zij leveren immers

    geen winstgevende vloeroppervlakte. In de oostelijke periferie van

    Ljubljana ligt het grootste shopping & entertainment district van

    Sloveni, BTC. BTC is de drijvende kracht achter een ambitieus

    stadsontwikkelingsproject dat het zal verbinden met het

    stadscentrum. Er komt een tram tussen de twee, met hierlangs

    allerlei huisvestingsprojecten en een kolossaal park. Hoewel het

    ruimteverslindende shopping district zelf ook nood heeft aan een

    stevige stadsvernieuwing, zal het nagenoeg ongewijzigd blijven

    en verder uitdijen. BTC residence wil afzien van deze status

    quo en bewijst dat BTC City met al zijn stedelijke functies het

    potentieel heeft om uit te groeien tot een waardevolle buurt voor

    zowel bewoners, shoppers als winkeliers. In BTC residence wordt

    een andere vorm van wonen en shoppen bedacht die meerdere

    partijen ten goede komt. BTC residence staat als een krachtig

    gebaar in het shopping weefsel: het omarmt de commercile

    infrastructuur, maar zal het tegelijkertijd ook intomen.

  • 8Table of Contents 7

    PROLOGUE 9

    THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 13

    1.1 Socio-Political Context 14

    Changing State Structures 14

    A Sequence of Economies 16

    A House for Everyone 18

    Sudden Privatisation 20

    The Market Rules 22

    1.2. Materialising Ideologies 24

    XIII projects 24

    The Modernist Approach (1945-1960) 26

    Scandinavian Inspiration and Structuralist Architecture (1960-1990) 28

    ika 30

    Block 32

    Supervilla 34

    1.3. Creativity in Collectivity 36

    THE ARRIVAL OF CAPITALISM 39

    2.1. BTC 40

    New Function for a Logistic Hub 40

    19 hours at BTC 43

    Wide range of Shopping typologies 44

    Metropolitan Vibrancy 46

    2.2. The martinska Partnership 50

    Peripheral site 50

    Linking the Centre 52

    Five Character Areas 52

    Feasibility 54

    Proposals for BTC 58

    1.

    2.

  • 9The Status-Quo of BTC 59

    2.3. The Potential of BTC 60

    THE ARRIVAL OF INHABITANTS 65

    3.1. BTC residence 66

    New Function for a Commercial Zone 66

    Perimeter-Blocks in the Pipeline 68

    Addressing Bigness 70

    Parking Lot 72

    All-You-Need in Hand-Reach 72

    Defining Places 74

    A New Shopping Typology 82

    3.2. The Quadrangle 84

    Neighbourhood, Building, Street, Flat 84

    Street in the Air 86

    Four Angles 90

    Figure Ground 92

    COMING IN 96

    WALKING UP 102

    EPILOGUE 125Bibliography 130

    3.

  • PROLOGUE

  • Socio-Political Context12

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_55kHX_188)http://www.belterracohousing.ca/

    Watch from 2:19: Cohousing is a great way to live in the 21st century. The best of all, this community is located on a small island surrounded by the ocean and only 20 minutes by ferry from Vancouver. Does cohousing necessarily mean a separation from society?

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 13

    In the Eastern periphery of Ljubljana, the biggest shopping &

    entertainment district of Slovenia is located, BTC. In BTC everything

    you need is in hand-reach: a fresh market, a dentist, a swimming pool,

    a theatre... Transport between the buildings happens exclusively by

    car and parking is free of charge everywhere. BTC is the thriving

    force behind an ambitious city development plan that will link the

    district with the historic city centre: the martinska Masterplan. A

    tram line will be constructed between the two, and a series of large

    scale housing developments will be erected along. While BTC could

    use a severe urban redevelopment itself, it seems that its nature

    will stay more or less the same and that it will continue expanding

    as a car-shopping-district. BTC Residence proves that there is a

    sustainable alternative for this profit-driven scenario.

    In the first chapter, the socio-political background of Ljubljana and

    Slovenia is analysed. We particularly focus on the Socialist period

    which resulted in a clear expression of collectivity in architecture and

    the urban fabric of Ljubljana. In the second chapter, we zoom in on

    BTC and illustrate how this development can be seen the symbol of

    the arrival of Capitalism. The third chapter introduces a new era

    in the history of BTC: the arrival of inhabitants. A masterplan is

    developed which deals with a particular area of BTC. To test the

    masterplan, one building is worked out in detail.

    Cohousing is often manifested as a community isolating from society.

    A literal demonstration of this can be found in the Belterra Cohousing

    project in which wealthy families live on an island next to Vancouver

    (see figure). Does cohousing necessarily mean a separation from

    society? Can this protective familiar environment of cohousing

    also be created inside a more urban environment amalgamated

    with the rest of the city? Maybe the concept of cohousing suits the

    new inhabitants of BTC as a way to cope with the somewhat harsh

    environment? How much can be shared in a hyper urban context?

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT1.

  • Socio-Political Context16

    1 GOW J, Slovenia and the Slovenes, London, 2010, p. 110.

    1.1 Socio-Political context

    Changing State StructuresThe territory that today constitutes Slovenia changed numerous

    times between various realms. From the Roman Empire, to the

    Austria-Hungarian Empire, to the Kingdom of Yugoslavia before

    the Second World War. During the War, the country was briefly

    occupied by the Nazis until it was liberated by the Partisan Army

    under the command of general Josip Broz Tito. A short period of

    Communism in line with the USSR followed, but after disputes

    between Tito and Stalin in 1948, Yugoslavia went its own way.

    From then on, Tito built its own socialism for Yugoslavia tactically

    oscillating between East and West.1 Tito remained the head

    of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia till his death in

    1980. Slovenia was one of the Republics until its independence

    Bregenz

    AlexandriaG

    Tirgovist

    CraiovaSlatina

    Drobeta Turnu-Severin

    SuceavaB

    Piatra-N

    Stiniu Ghe

    Bucuresti (Bu

    Country of South SlavsAustria-Hungaria Slovenia1970 1980 1990 2000 20101940 1950 19601910 1920 19301880 1890 19001870

    Socialist Federal Republik of YugoslaviaRoyal YugoslaviaAustria-Hungaria Slovenia1970 1980 1990 2000 20101940 1950 19601910 1920 19301880 1890 19001870

    EU 20081982

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 17

    Bregenz

    AlexandriaG

    Tirgovist

    CraiovaSlatina

    Drobeta Turnu-Severin

    SuceavaB

    Piatra-N

    Stiniu Ghe

    Bucuresti (Bu

    Country of South SlavsAustria-Hungaria Slovenia1970 1980 1990 2000 20101940 1950 19601910 1920 19301880 1890 19001870

    Socialist Federal Republik of YugoslaviaRoyal YugoslaviaAustria-Hungaria Slovenia1970 1980 1990 2000 20101940 1950 19601910 1920 19301880 1890 19001870

    EU 20081982

    in 1991, when it became a neo-liberal democracy and afterwards

    a member of the European Union. The link between the Slovenes

    in every state structure over time, has always been its own

    language, originating from the Slavs that arrived between the

    sixth and eight centuries.

  • Socio-Political Context18

    Socialist Federal Republik of YugoslaviaRoyal Yugoslavia Slovenia1970 1980 1990 2000 20101940 1950 19601920 1930

    Agricultural Employment of Slovene Lands

    80 %

    90 %

    70 %

    60 %

    50 %

    40 %

    30 %

    20 %

    10 %

    TITOARMYPARTY

    PR

    IVAT

    IZAT

    ION

    PAR

    TISA

    N L

    IBER

    ATIO

    N

    1982 EU 2008

    65%Agricultural employment

    46%Industrial employment

    Smallholdings/Enterprises Farmers/Employers

    Self-

    suffici

    ent

    Work force

    Goods & Services

    Enterprises

    Local governmentEmployers/Citizens

    Supp

    ort

    Work force

    Obedience

    local

    63%Services employment

    Enterprises Employers/Consumers

    Work force

    Goods & Services

    A Sequence of EconomiesIn contrast to other European regions, Yugoslavia and Slovenia

    were still mainly rural at the beginning of the twentieth century.

    In the1920s, 65 percent of the Slovenian working population was

    employed in the agricultural sector: the economy was based on

    smallholdings and few other enterprises 2.

    After WW2, a whole new structure of society was believed to

    be necessary with Socialism as the ideological framework. The

    main objective was not to represent society as it was, as a normal

    democracy would do, but to radically change it into a class-

    less one.3 The Yugoslavs introduced the concept of workers

    self-managment as the key-concept of their Socialism, clearly

    distinguishing themselves from the Communists of the USSR.

    Self-managment provided the practical tools to evolve towards

    a stateless and self-regulated society, guided by the working

    class. The financial motors for this system were the industrial

    enterprises, which were socially owned by their employees. The

    employees were involved in decision making of the enterprise

    2 GOW J, Slovenia and the Slovenes, London, 2010, p. 110.

    3 JOVIC D, Yugoslavia as a project and experiment, unfinished modernisations, Zagreb, 2012, p. 17.

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 19

    Socialist Federal Republik of YugoslaviaRoyal Yugoslavia Slovenia1970 1980 1990 2000 20101940 1950 19601920 1930

    Agricultural Employment of Slovene Lands

    80 %

    90 %

    70 %

    60 %

    50 %

    40 %

    30 %

    20 %

    10 %

    TITOARMYPARTY

    PR

    IVAT

    IZAT

    ION

    PAR

    TISA

    N L

    IBER

    ATIO

    N

    1982 EU 2008

    65%Agricultural employment

    46%Industrial employment

    Smallholdings/Enterprises Farmers/Employers

    Self-

    suffici

    ent

    Work force

    Goods & Services

    Enterprises

    Local governmentEmployers/Citizens

    Supp

    ort

    Work force

    Obedience

    local

    63%Services employment

    Enterprises Employers/Consumers

    Work force

    Goods & Services

    via workers councils (see fig 8), they could elect their own

    management and if the company made profit, they received a

    share. Moreover, the enterprises provided social services for

    their employees such as holidays and housing. This way socio-

    political entities were formed around enterprises, constructing a

    decentralized society. The enterprises were competing amongst

    each other in a semi-market economy, people could travel freely

    and there was press freedom.

    However, a relatively participatory, democratic economy on the

    company level functioned within a wider authoritarian system

    of political monopoly 4. The Party planned the construction of

    new enterprises, supervised the enterprises but also protected

    the unproductive ones. This meant that workers didnt actually

    depend on their self-managed decisions which eroded their

    responsibility and subverted market mechanisms. The financial

    debt that followed out of this protectionism is often seen as one

    of the main reasons of the final collapse of the system. Moreover,

    the system was not flexible enough to adapt to the newly emerging

    service-based economy.

    A workers council of a self-managed enterprise A

    A BLAU, RUPNIK, Project Zagreb, transition as condition, (Croation State Archive), Barcelona, 2007, pp. 209.

    4 JAKOPOVICH D., Yugoslavias Self-Managment, Keep space for Peace, Spokesman 117, pp. 57 - 63, 2011.

  • Socio-Political Context20

    1982Socialist Federal Republik of Yugoslavia Slovenia

    1970 1980 1990 2000 20101950 1960EU 2008

    Employees

    Municipality

    local

    Work force

    Solidarity Contributions

    Housing Fund

    local

    FamilyHousing Bank

    Housing Fund

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Financially semi-favorable condition

    Financially favorable condition

    SocialRent

    C

    SocialRent

    PrivatePurchase

    WithFamily

    HeritageDonation

    A B C D E

    Self-help

    F

    LOAN

    RENT

    RENT

    18% 3% 7% 24% 18% 25%

    1982Socialist Federal Republik of Yugoslavia Slovenia

    1970 1980 1990 2000 20101950 1960EU 2008

    Employees

    Municipality

    local

    Work force

    Solidarity Contributions

    Housing Fund

    local

    FamilyHousing Bank

    Housing Fund

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Financially semi-favorable condition

    Financially favorable condition

    SocialRent

    C

    SocialRent

    PrivatePurchase

    WithFamily

    HeritageDonation

    A B C D E

    Self-help

    F

    LOAN

    RENT

    RENT

    18% 3% 7% 24% 18% 25%

    A House for EveryoneDuring the socialist regime, housing was a constitutional right.

    The state tried to provide housing for every working person,

    but a big share of the population had to obtain housing without

    the support of the state. Professor Srna Mandic commissioned

    a study on the population of the Socialist Republic of Slovenia

    in 1984, and concluded that there were six ways of obtaining a

    house (see fig. 7: A,B,C,D,E and F) 5.

    The first two methods, applied by one fifth of the interviewed

    people, were heavily supported by the state and were called

    social rent. Social rent was in line with the concept of the

    self-managed enterprises. A share of their profit was invested

    Six ways of obtaining a house in Slovenia under socialism (1984).Data: MANDIC 1996.

    5 MANDIC S, The meaning of home ownership in the transition from socialism, Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, Glasgow, 1996, pp. 88.

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 21

    1982Socialist Federal Republik of Yugoslavia Slovenia

    1970 1980 1990 2000 20101950 1960EU 2008

    Employees

    Municipality

    local

    Work force

    Solidarity Contributions

    Housing Fund

    local

    FamilyHousing Bank

    Housing Fund

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Financially semi-favorable condition

    Financially favorable condition

    SocialRent

    C

    SocialRent

    PrivatePurchase

    WithFamily

    HeritageDonation

    A B C D E

    Self-help

    F

    LOAN

    RENT

    RENT

    18% 3% 7% 24% 18% 25%

    B BLAU, RUPNIK, Project Zagreb, transition as condition, (Croation State Archive), Barcelona, 2007, pp. 250.

    C TSENKOVA, Housing Policy Reforms in Post-Socialist Europe. Alberta, 2009, pp. 213.

    into two institutions: the Housing Fund of the enterprise and

    the Housing Fund of the municipality. With the money of its

    own Housing Fund, the enterprise could provide housing for

    its employees (A). Architectural competitions were held for the

    design, while the construction was executed by state-owned

    construction enterprises. Housing typologies varied according

    to the specific situation. The allocation of dwellings was based

    on a number of eligibility criteria on which a priority list was

    established. The eligibility criteria included the housing need, the

    number of household members, disabilities, health conditions,

    but also the employees position, years with the enterprise as

    well as the social and economic position of household members.

    Even though the dwellings were social property, the occupants

    had de facto property rights: guaranteed lifetime occupancy, no

    eviction without compensation with another unit and the right to

    inherit or transfer housing to family members. Rents were very

    low and typically did not even cover operation and maintenance

    costs. On the other hand, a share of the profit of the enterprise

    went to the municipality fund of the local government (B). The

    allocation was commissioned with a waiting list as well, and

    several decades of patience was necessary.

    The Housing Funds were also used to provide cheaper loans to

    the employees via the Housing Bank, this accounted for 7 % of the

    interviewed people (C). Becoming a homeowner was economically

    much less attractive than being a social renter because of the

    costs of the mortgage repayment. Other important strategies of

    obtaining a home were inheritance (D) or living with the family (E).

    The largest share of the people (25%) obtained their house

    without any state support by making it their-self usually with the

    help of friends and family (F). Although it was not encouraged,

    the state realized that the construction of self-help houses was

    necessary to meet the housing needs. Some houses were legally

    constructed, but also informal settlements in urban and non-

    urban areas arose. Often, de facto legality was implied over time

    by the fact that the settlements were not demolished, and some

    infrastructure, such as piped water, electricity and sewer were

    provided afterwards.

    Areal view of a socio-political entity consisting of an enterprise and adjacent housing estates provided for the workers. B

    Informal self-help housing in Kosovo.C

  • Socio-Political Context22

    Sudden PrivatisationAfter the independence of Slovenia in 1991 and the fall of socialism,

    the socially owned property had to be privatised. With regard to

    housing, 33 per cent of the total housing stock of Slovenia was

    hitherto socially owned, as it was used for social rent by the title-

    holders (i.e. the municipality or the enterprises) 6. Due to the

    Housing Act, the title-holders were obliged to offer their housing

    stock to the sitting tenants. The Housing Act also determined the

    price of the sale, on basis of the housing unit quality and the year

    of construction. There was often a large discrepancy between the

    book value and the market value as locality was not considered

    and huge discounts were granted.

    The Housing Act has produced a whole new class of apartment

    owners, many of whom do not have the necessary prerogatives

    of ownership (high income or wealth), since they became

    owners more by circumstance than by normal economic criteria.

    The new mixed ownership buildings (previously 100 per cent

    tenant-occupied) are facing severe problems in maintenance

    and the financing of major repairs. Moreover, the surrounding

    socially owned grounds of the estates were often not sold. As a

    consequence, these grounds are often not maintained or falsely

    claimed by developers to exploit it as parking.

    1982Socialist Federal Republik of Yugoslavia Slovenia

    1970 1980 1990 2000 20101950 1960EU 2008

    1993: Non-profit Rent1991: Public Rent, owned by Enterprise

    1991: Public Rent, owned by Municipality1993: Non-profit Rent

    Owner-occupied

    Housing Fund

    Housing Fund

    local Priority to former tenants

    Prices very low

    Owner

    total housing stock of Slovenia total housing stock of Slovenia

    1991 1993

    SALES SELL

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    6 STANOVIK T, The Sale of the Social Housing Stock in Slovenia: What Happened and Why, Urban Studies, Vol. 31, No. 9, Glasgow, 1993, pp. 1559.

    D Photograph of collective ground surrounding estates being exploited as parking lot.

    E Photograph of a privatised former social-rent housing estate.

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Privatisation between 1991 and 1993. DATA: MANDIC 1996.

    Tenancy comparison between Slovenia and Belgium in 2011.DATA: EUROSTAT. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 23

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    D

    E

  • Socio-Political Context24

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    6 PETERLIN M, The effects of crisis on realestate market and construction industry in Slovenia, Slovenian URBACT NationalDissemination Point, Brussels, 2010, pp. 2.

    The Market RulesWhereas during socialism the large scale housing projects were

    monitored by the government, after the independence they were to

    be realised by market mechanisms. As Andreja Cirman from the

    Faculty of Economics in Ljubljana noted, things went out of hand:

    The situation on the housing market of Slovenia today displays

    the consequences of the financial and economic crisis on the one

    hand, weakening the demand, but on the other hand it is also

    the consequence of past behaviour of developers and investors.

    Many of them have built on the assumption that the market will

    swallow anything. The Celovki dvori project, comprising of

    nearly 1000 dwellings, is a typical example of such thinking. Its

    poor quality architecture and pathological hyper-density make it

    a clear case of abuse of space. [...] These dwellings were built

    in a quest for profit without taking into account the needs of

    the future residents.6 Because the majority of the dwellings of

    Celovki Dvori remained unsold, the construction company had

    to lower their prices considerably in order to save itself from

    bankruptcy. Subsequently, the government bought a large share

    for social housing which transformed the estate into a ghetto with

    significant social unrest.

    The Celovki Dvori is just one example of many other similar

    housing developments around Ljubljana. Map 2 shows several

    recent-built housing projects that we visited. They seem to

    incorporate higher density, lower living quality and less creativity

    than their modernist predecessors.

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    0 1 km 2 km

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 25

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

    Slovenia1990 2000 2010

    EU 2008

    Financially not-favorable condition

    Slovenian Housing FundFamilyBankDevelopper Individual

    Financially semi-favorable

    Financially favorable Owner

    No loanReduced

    RentOwnerLoan

    A B C D

    OwnerNo loan

    Reduced Rent

    OwnerLoan

    A B C D

    SL

    BE

    NormalRent

    NormalRent

  • 26 Materialising Ideologies

    1.2. MaterialiSing ideologieS

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    first collective housing project

    symbol of liberalism: an international city

    standardisation: first large scale residential area

    tower housing typology with flexible plans

    first prefab system

    individualism on large scale

    selfsustainable scandinavian neighbourhood

    the economical crisis effects housing quality

    liberalism and luxury apartments

    the modernist villas on the edge of the city

    symbol of nationalism: a new state with a national city in a traditional style

    symbol of socialism: combining the commercial, cultural and political power

    symbol of kapitalism: a new economic power

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    OCCURRENCES

    XIII ICONS

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN INSPIRATION BREAKING WITH THE PAST

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGN

    AND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARY

    ARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURAL

    ARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    NEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    XIII projectsThis section provides an overview of the key players within the

    architectural history of Ljubljana. These players created icons

    for the city in terms of housing typologies and monuments that,

    intentional or not, put their mark on the city image. To illustrate

    the history of ideologies that defined Ljubljana, thirteen iconic

    projects are depicted. In the end of the section, a selection of

    the typical neighbourhoods and housing typologies is showed, as

    reminiscences of Socialism.

    E. Mihevc (11-85) E. Ravnikar (07-93) France Ivanek (22-07) I. Arnautovic (24-09)

    O. Wagner (41-18) M. Fabiani (65-62) J. Plenik (72-57) I. Vurnic (84-71)

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    first collective housing project

    symbol of liberalism: an international city

    standardisation: first large scale residential area

    tower housing typology with flexible plans

    first prefab system

    individualism on large scale

    selfsustainable scandinavian neighbourhood

    the economical crisis effects housing quality

    liberalism and luxury apartments

    the modernist villas on the edge of the city

    symbol of nationalism: a new state with a national city in a traditional style

    symbol of socialism: combining the commercial, cultural and political power

    symbol of kapitalism: a new economic power

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    OCCURRENCES

    XIII ICONS

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN INSPIRATION BREAKING WITH THE PAST

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGN

    AND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARY

    ARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURAL

    ARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    NEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    by Jens Verley, Mait Delvaux, Laura Van Bel, Pieter-Jan Debuyst

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 27

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    first collective housing project

    symbol of liberalism: an international city

    standardisation: first large scale residential area

    tower housing typology with flexible plans

    first prefab system

    individualism on large scale

    selfsustainable scandinavian neighbourhood

    the economical crisis effects housing quality

    liberalism and luxury apartments

    the modernist villas on the edge of the city

    symbol of nationalism: a new state with a national city in a traditional style

    symbol of socialism: combining the commercial, cultural and political power

    symbol of kapitalism: a new economic power

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    OCCURRENCES

    XIII ICONS

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN INSPIRATION BREAKING WITH THE PAST

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGN

    AND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARY

    ARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURAL

    ARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    NEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    first collective housing project

    symbol of liberalism: an international city

    standardisation: first large scale residential area

    tower housing typology with flexible plans

    first prefab system

    individualism on large scale

    selfsustainable scandinavian neighbourhood

    the economical crisis effects housing quality

    liberalism and luxury apartments

    the modernist villas on the edge of the city

    symbol of nationalism: a new state with a national city in a traditional style

    symbol of socialism: combining the commercial, cultural and political power

    symbol of kapitalism: a new economic power

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    OCCURRENCES

    XIII ICONS

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN INSPIRATION BREAKING WITH THE PAST

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGN

    AND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARY

    ARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURAL

    ARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    NEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    school buildings within neighbourhoodpublic facilities within neighbourhoodhousing within neighbourhoodother

    http://www.geopedia.si/ 13.10.29http://urbanizem.ljubljana.si/ 13.10.29http://www.virostatiq.com/data/ljubljana-building-ages/ 13.10.29

    0 200 500 m 1 km 2 km

  • 28 Materialising Ideologies

    F http://www.fondationlecorbusier.fr/corbuweb/morpheus.aspx?sysId=13&IrisObjectId=6719&sysLanguage=en-en&itemPos=83&itemCount=300&sysParentId=15, 13.10.22

    G http://corbu2.caed.kent.edu/architronic/v4n2/pix/v4n2.02pa.jpg, 13.10.22

    The Modernist Approach (1945-1960)During the interwar period, Bauhaus and CIAM laid the

    groundwork for the modernist ideology.

    A seminar by Ivan Vurnik introduced Slovenian students to the

    architecture of Le Corbusier and other modernists and the

    excursion to the international exhibition of decorative arts in Paris

    in 1925 encouraged them to apply for scholarships issued by the

    French government. Pleniks stubbornness towards modernism

    caused 15 per cent of his pre-war students to leave Ljubljana to

    study under Le Corbusier in Paris. Here they met many leading

    architects of the modern ideology. Designers from all over the

    world, including Japanese and Danish architects, would change

    their perspective on architecture, leaving post-war Ljubljana with

    a new generation of architects. Edvard Ravnikar was one of the

    last students of Plenik to seize this opportunity and he would

    play an important role in the architectural history of Ljubljana.

    Ravnikars architecture looks modernist but isnt a complete

    break with Pleniks teachings. He combines the modern with

    traditional methods and materials, like brick, thus creating a

    critical regionalism.

    In 1955 the state launches its own form of socialism, self-

    management, and thereby dissociates itself with Stalins

    communism. The atmosphere changes from a communist to

    a consumption society, holding new architectural challenges.

    A good example is Ravnikars square of revolution, designed

    in 1959, which serves as a large parking space and contains a

    supermarket and several cultural facilities such as a theatre.

    Two towers overlook the square and symbolise the political and

    economical power of the new, socialist Ljubljana.

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) Le Corbusier (87-65) E. Mihevc (11-85) I. Arnautovic (24-09)J. Plenik (72-57)

    Studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret at rue de Svres in Paris F

    Square of Revolution, designed by Edvard Ravnikar. After 1991, the break of Yugoslavia, it became Square of the Republic G

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 29

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    FIRST COLLECTIVE HOUSING PROJECT

    STANDARDISATION : FIRST LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL AREA

    LUXURY APARTMENTS IN TOWER TYPOLOGY

    TOWER TYPOLOGY FOR HOUSING WITH FLEXIBLE PLANS

    FIRST PREFAB-SYSTEM

    INDIVIDUALISM ON LARGE SCALE

    SELFSUSTAINABLE SCANDINAVIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD

    THE ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE LOSS OF IDENTITY MAKES BUILDING COMPLEXES FAIL

    LIBERALISM BRINGS BACK LUXURY APARTMENTS

    THE MODERNIST VILLAS ON THE EDGE OF THE CITY

    SYMBOL OF NATIONALISM : A NEW STATE WITH A NATIONAL CITY IN A TRADITIONAL STYLE

    SYMBOL OF LIBERALISM : AN INTERNATIONAL CITY

    SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM : A NEW REGIME WITH A UNITED COMMERCIAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL POWER

    SYMBOL OF KAPITALISM : A NEW ECONOMIC POWER

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever ( F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    TENDENCIES

    OCCURRENCES

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN ARCHITECTURE BREAKING WITH THE PASTCITY IDEOLOGY OF ITS TIMEHOUSING IDEOLOGY

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGNAND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARYARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURALARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISMNEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    FIRST COLLECTIVE HOUSING PROJECT

    STANDARDISATION : FIRST LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL AREA

    LUXURY APARTMENTS IN TOWER TYPOLOGY

    TOWER TYPOLOGY FOR HOUSING WITH FLEXIBLE PLANS

    FIRST PREFAB-SYSTEM

    INDIVIDUALISM ON LARGE SCALE

    SELFSUSTAINABLE SCANDINAVIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD

    THE ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE LOSS OF IDENTITY MAKES BUILDING COMPLEXES FAIL

    LIBERALISM BRINGS BACK LUXURY APARTMENTS

    THE MODERNIST VILLAS ON THE EDGE OF THE CITY

    SYMBOL OF NATIONALISM : A NEW STATE WITH A NATIONAL CITY IN A TRADITIONAL STYLE

    SYMBOL OF LIBERALISM : AN INTERNATIONAL CITY

    SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM : A NEW REGIME WITH A UNITED COMMERCIAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL POWER

    SYMBOL OF KAPITALISM : A NEW ECONOMIC POWER

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever ( F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    TENDENCIES

    OCCURRENCES

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN ARCHITECTURE BREAKING WITH THE PASTCITY IDEOLOGY OF ITS TIMEHOUSING IDEOLOGY

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGNAND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARYARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURALARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISMNEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    FIRST COLLECTIVE HOUSING PROJECT

    STANDARDISATION : FIRST LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL AREA

    LUXURY APARTMENTS IN TOWER TYPOLOGY

    TOWER TYPOLOGY FOR HOUSING WITH FLEXIBLE PLANS

    FIRST PREFAB-SYSTEM

    INDIVIDUALISM ON LARGE SCALE

    SELFSUSTAINABLE SCANDINAVIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD

    THE ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE LOSS OF IDENTITY MAKES BUILDING COMPLEXES FAIL

    LIBERALISM BRINGS BACK LUXURY APARTMENTS

    THE MODERNIST VILLAS ON THE EDGE OF THE CITY

    SYMBOL OF NATIONALISM : A NEW STATE WITH A NATIONAL CITY IN A TRADITIONAL STYLE

    SYMBOL OF LIBERALISM : AN INTERNATIONAL CITY

    SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM : A NEW REGIME WITH A UNITED COMMERCIAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL POWER

    SYMBOL OF KAPITALISM : A NEW ECONOMIC POWER

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever ( F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    TENDENCIES

    OCCURRENCES

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN ARCHITECTURE BREAKING WITH THE PASTCITY IDEOLOGY OF ITS TIMEHOUSING IDEOLOGY

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGNAND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARYARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURALARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISMNEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    FIRST COLLECTIVE HOUSING PROJECT

    STANDARDISATION : FIRST LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL AREA

    LUXURY APARTMENTS IN TOWER TYPOLOGY

    TOWER TYPOLOGY FOR HOUSING WITH FLEXIBLE PLANS

    FIRST PREFAB-SYSTEM

    INDIVIDUALISM ON LARGE SCALE

    SELFSUSTAINABLE SCANDINAVIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD

    THE ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE LOSS OF IDENTITY MAKES BUILDING COMPLEXES FAIL

    LIBERALISM BRINGS BACK LUXURY APARTMENTS

    THE MODERNIST VILLAS ON THE EDGE OF THE CITY

    SYMBOL OF NATIONALISM : A NEW STATE WITH A NATIONAL CITY IN A TRADITIONAL STYLE

    SYMBOL OF LIBERALISM : AN INTERNATIONAL CITY

    SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM : A NEW REGIME WITH A UNITED COMMERCIAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL POWER

    SYMBOL OF KAPITALISM : A NEW ECONOMIC POWER

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever ( F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    TENDENCIES

    OCCURRENCES

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN ARCHITECTURE BREAKING WITH THE PASTCITY IDEOLOGY OF ITS TIMEHOUSING IDEOLOGY

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGNAND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARYARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURALARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISMNEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    The Second World War also meant the change from a rural to

    an industrial society. People were moving into the city and this

    caused a huge housing shortage. The field of interest of post-

    war architecture changed from the city centre to the suburbs.

    Besides large industrial terrains there are a lot of residential

    areas established to house all the workers. To make this happen

    as fast and efficiently as possible, two techniques were introduced

    by the modernists, standardisation and prefabrication.

    Another one of Pleniks students, Edo Mihevc, also embraced

    modernism. He designed the workers residential neighbourhood

    near Litostroj, a strongly industrialised area founded just after

    World War II at the intersection of two important radial roads.

    This neighbourhood is a good example of standardisation. The

    residential buildings are placed in rows with just enough distance

    in between to allow the sunlight to reach every residence. The

    approach was very rational, everything was calculated. This

    design caused for Mihevc to be thought of as the founder of

    Slovenian modernism.

    This rational approach soon showed its true colours, the

    residences didnt quite reach the appropriate living standards.

    In response to the low standard of living and the minimalistic

    approach of the existenzminimum, architects like Ilija Arnautovi

    sought a way to higher this standard again. The floor plans of

    Arnautovi SAVA residential towers offered a spacious feeling

    in a small living area. This was possible due to the fact that the

    circulation was incorporated in the different rooms, grouped

    around a central kitchen and bathroom area. The SAVA tower

    typology can be found on various locations throughout the city.

    The first prefabricated system used in Ljubljana is the Jugemont

    System. This system, also designed by Arnautovi, utilizes heavy

    concrete wall structures, which are masked on the faade by an

    elegant balcony construction in white steel. Prefabrication was

    still in the early stages but the advantages were already apparent,

    buildings were erected much faster to compensate the housing

    Housing Estate Litostroj Residential Towers Sava Square of the Revolution - Square of the Republic Jugomont System Housing Blocks

    The Jugemont System J

    Housing Estate Litostroj H

    H http://www.flickr.com/photos/56083473@N04/6154316127/in/photostream/, 13.10.22

    I http://www.arhitekturni-vodnik.org/en/?object=35&mode=1, 13.10.22

    J http://www.arhitekturni-vodnik.org/en/?object=100&mode=1&pic=490&pl=0&o=0&a=0

    The SAVA residential towers designed by Milan Mihelic and Ilija Arnautovi I

  • 30 Materialising Ideologies

    Scandinavian Inspiration and Structuralist Architecture (1960-1990)

    The conservative teachings of Plenik at the faculty of architecture

    had to make way for a new reign with the freedom to think, the

    Ravnikar-school.

    This school, founded by Edo Mihevc and Edvard Ravnikar,

    represents a think tank, with not only room for architecture, but

    philosophy and art as well. It is based on scientific research,

    analyses and syntheses instead of copying the classics, and can

    be seen as the starting point of Slovenian modernism. The school

    will lead a new generation of architects with a strong ide fixe

    for structural engineering and Scandinavian architecture that

    will define Ljubljana in the 60s, during times of economical

    prosperity.

    Due to the economical growth, a good relationship between the

    Slovenian architects and the contractors came about. New forms

    of prefabrication were established and pre-stressed concrete

    emerged, causing the architectural trade to shift towards the

    art of engineering. A new architectural language came to life,

    brutalism, structural elements were used to create spatial

    compositions and as external ornaments, making them the

    centrepiece of architectural expression. Some of Ravnikars

    students, like Milan Miheli and Savin Sever, are highly proficient

    when it comes to brutalism. Every project imaginable was

    executed in this structural architecture, from garages, offices

    and banks to schools and residential buildings, even entire

    neighbourhoods.

    The economical growth also made travelling possible. The majority

    of architects chose to visit Sweden or other parts of Scandinavia,

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) A. Aalto France Ivanek I. Arnautovic (24-09)

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 31

    which were recommended by the Ravnikar-school. Countries

    that, like Yugoslavia, were open to socialist ideas. Functionalism

    and rationalism reigned supreme in other parts of Europe, but

    Scandinavia focused on the relationship with nature and valued

    quality over quantity. (The urban planning strategy of the lobe-city

    and the concept of social housing both originated in Scandinavia.)

    Strong links were created with Scandinavia and their typologies

    in terms of architecture, housing and urban design were adopted.

    Exchanges with the University of Ljubljana allowed students to

    analyse the well-designed Swedish neighbourhood.

    To prove that individual housing doesnt have to be more expensive

    than collective housing, France and Marta Ivanek designed the

    neighbourhood Murgle. They had both studied in Scandinavia

    and dealt with the question of housing culture throughout their

    career. During construction, the neighbourhood seemed barren

    and repetitive, fit for the socialist middle class. Today, on the other

    hand, Murgle is one of the most desirable housing settlements in

    Ljubljana, offering a single-family house and a private garden, set

    in a green environment.

    The housing neighbourhoods alongside the radial roads are built

    after the Scandinavian model of the lobe-city. Neighbourhood

    BS3 by Ilija Arnautovi is an example where many facilities are

    incorporated, some usefull, like a postal office, a bank, a library

    and education, other for entertainment, like a bowling alley and

    some bars and restaurants. Housing is offered in two typologies,

    lower blocks consisting of 4 stories, and towers, consisting of 22

    stories. The towers are constructed sculpturally ending in sharp

    point, earning them the name the Pencil Towers.

    K http://www.arhitekturni-vodnik.org/en/?object=147&mode=1&pic=1623&pl=0&o=0&a=0, 13.10.22

    L http://www.arhitekturni-vodnik.org/en/?object=196&mode=1&pic=1598&pl=0&o=0&a=0, 13.10.22

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    FIRST COLLECTIVE HOUSING PROJECT

    STANDARDISATION : FIRST LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL AREA

    LUXURY APARTMENTS IN TOWER TYPOLOGY

    TOWER TYPOLOGY FOR HOUSING WITH FLEXIBLE PLANS

    FIRST PREFAB-SYSTEM

    INDIVIDUALISM ON LARGE SCALE

    SELFSUSTAINABLE SCANDINAVIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD

    THE ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE LOSS OF IDENTITY MAKES BUILDING COMPLEXES FAIL

    LIBERALISM BRINGS BACK LUXURY APARTMENTS

    THE MODERNIST VILLAS ON THE EDGE OF THE CITY

    SYMBOL OF NATIONALISM : A NEW STATE WITH A NATIONAL CITY IN A TRADITIONAL STYLE

    SYMBOL OF LIBERALISM : AN INTERNATIONAL CITY

    SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM : A NEW REGIME WITH A UNITED COMMERCIAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL POWER

    SYMBOL OF KAPITALISM : A NEW ECONOMIC POWER

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever ( F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    TENDENCIES

    OCCURRENCES

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN ARCHITECTURE BREAKING WITH THE PASTCITY IDEOLOGY OF ITS TIMEHOUSING IDEOLOGY

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGNAND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARYARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURALARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISMNEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    E. Mihevc (11-85) prof Ljubljana

    IKEA

    FIRST COLLECTIVE HOUSING PROJECT

    STANDARDISATION : FIRST LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL AREA

    LUXURY APARTMENTS IN TOWER TYPOLOGY

    TOWER TYPOLOGY FOR HOUSING WITH FLEXIBLE PLANS

    FIRST PREFAB-SYSTEM

    INDIVIDUALISM ON LARGE SCALE

    SELFSUSTAINABLE SCANDINAVIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD

    THE ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE LOSS OF IDENTITY MAKES BUILDING COMPLEXES FAIL

    LIBERALISM BRINGS BACK LUXURY APARTMENTS

    THE MODERNIST VILLAS ON THE EDGE OF THE CITY

    SYMBOL OF NATIONALISM : A NEW STATE WITH A NATIONAL CITY IN A TRADITIONAL STYLE

    SYMBOL OF LIBERALISM : AN INTERNATIONAL CITY

    SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM : A NEW REGIME WITH A UNITED COMMERCIAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL POWER

    SYMBOL OF KAPITALISM : A NEW ECONOMIC POWER

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof ViennaC. Sitte (43-03) City planner Ljubljana

    O. Wagner (41-18)

    J. Costaperaria (76-51)

    Le Corbusier (87-65)P. Jeanneret (96-67) Perret Brothers (74-54)C. Perriand (03-99)

    V. ubic (94-46)

    P. Behrens (68-40)

    J. Lajovic (32)G. Kosak (32)M. Dobravec-Lajovic (31)O. Jugovec (21-87)

    I. Arnautovic (24-09)S. Sever (27-03) prof LjubljanaM. MihelicM. BonceS. Kristl

    F. Ivansek (22-07)M. Ivansek

    M. Music

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) prof Ljubljana

    E. Ravnikar (07-93) M. Oraen (00-75) M. Sever ( F. Novak (06-59)H. Brni (14-91)M. Tepina (13-04)J. Kruni (15-01)M. upani (14-07)

    TENDENCIES

    OCCURRENCES

    M. Fabiani (65-62) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71) Found School of Architecture

    J. Plenik (72-57) prof Ljubljana

    I. Vurnik (84-71)

    I. Vurnik (84-71) H. Hus (96-60)J. Omahen (98-80)D. Serajnik (99-83)

    F. Tomai (99-68)M. Strenar (01-68)

    TOWARDS A SLOVENIAN IDENTITY THE MODERNIST APPROACH A SCANDINAVIAN ARCHITECTURE BREAKING WITH THE PASTCITY IDEOLOGY OF ITS TIMEHOUSING IDEOLOGY

    A search for identity and a national style

    Plenik-schoolA search for an international style

    Vurnik-school

    A think thank for art , philosophy and architecture. Searching for a Slovenian identity and style but open toward the world and its tendencies.

    Ravnikar-school

    STOCKHOLMKOPENHAGEN

    DUSSELDORF

    EUROPEWORLD

    VIENNA

    PRAGUE

    PARIS

    VIENNA SECESSION

    ARTS AND CRAFTS

    TRADITIONALISM

    MODERNISM

    REGIONALISMPOPULISM

    NIEUWE ZAKELIJKHEID

    DEUTSCHE WERKBUND

    SCANDINAVIAN DESIGNAND NEOFUNCTIONALISM

    CONTEMPORARYARCHITECTURE

    STRUCTURALARCHITECTURE

    DUTCH NEOFUNCTIONALISMNEOFORMALISM

    STAR ARCHITECTURE

    FUNCTIONALISM

    BRUTALISM

    1925 PARISInternational Exposition of Modern Industrial and Decorative Arts. Ivan Vurnic changes camp.

    1931 LJUBLJANAThe competition for the National and University Library. It was a showdown between Plecnik and Vurnik. Plecnik won the competition.

    1929-1940 PARISThe studio of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret where they had international connections with Japan and Denmark

    1950 LJUBLJANA Ravnikar promotes the finnish architecture of Alvar Aalto (98-76).

    1965-1970 LJUB LJANA Scandinavian models are the inspiration for a lot of projects on different scales in Ljubljana. Also ingineering becomes more and more important as where the projects become bigger and a higher economical efficiency was needed.

    1991 LJUB LJANA The fall of Yugoslavia. Slovenia becomes independent. The borders open towards more liberal countries and kapitalism becomes visible in the city.

    1920 LJUBLJANAIvan Vurnic founds the Faculty of Architecture together with Max Fabiani and Joe Plenik.

    1895 LJUBLJANAAn earthquake brings renowned architects to Ljubljana.

    Murgle housing neighbourhood Stanovanjske stolpnice aka pencil towers in Nove Stoice (BS3)

    Housing Estate Murgle K

    The pencil towers in BS3 L

  • 32 Materialising Ideologies

    50

    50

    1,81

    6736

    ika

    1500

    1500

    V/T

    inhabitants 1

    schools

    sport facilities

    stores

    public space

    semi-public space

    semi-private space

    private gardens

    3,21 kmdistance city centre

    1967-1972realisation 2

  • 33THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT

    ika is one of the many

    socialist projects in Ljubljana.

    Schools and sport facilities

    are integrated in the design of

    the neighbourhood. Density is

    managed by the multi-storey

    apartment blocks surrounded

    by large green areas providing

    play and rest spaces for the

    inhabitants. These building

    blocks are 3 to 5 storeys higher

    than those of tepanjsko naselje.

    Unlike tepanjsko naselje the

    ground floor apartments are

    equipped with private gardens,

    each finished of with concrete

    slabs.

    1 http://www.gis.si/kasper/en/index.html, 14.03.19

    2 lecture Anja Planiek, University of Architecture Ljubljana, 13.09.30

    A http://www.slovenskenovice.si/crni-scenarij/doma/ljubljana-mladoletnik-padel-iz-12-nadstropja, 14.03.11

  • 34 Materialising Ideologies

    Block

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 35

    After the Second World War a

    concentration of housing need,

    both in terms of space and time,

    demanded effective solutions1.

    Planned mass housing, built

    for Average Joe and based on a

    rational plan model, used time-

    saving standardised building

    parts. These developments used

    both block and tower typology.

    A neighbourhood for several

    thousands of people was in that

    way constructed in a very short

    period of time.

    These building blocks were

    characterized by a diverse class

    structure. A doctor or college

    professor was living on the

    bigger ground floor apartment

    while a young couple hired a

    smaller apartment on a higher

    floor. This changed after the

    independence in 1991. A growing

    class segregation and socio-

    demographic homogenisation

    started to develop2.

    The legacy of this type of housing

    estates is a high quantity of

    dwellings that are today in urgent

    need for renovation and are often

    not adapted to the present needs.

    1 BREZAR, M., Housing construction in Slovenia in the past and present in: Urbani izzi, 1995 (6) nr. 2, pp. 98-108

    2 URSIC, M., Changing the quality of living and housing mobility in Ljubljana: Increase of social instability in larger housing estates? in: Urbani izziv, 2005 (16) nr. 2, pp. 156-163

    2

  • 36 Materialising Ideologies

    Supervilla

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 37

    After the 1950s a couple of

    companies started their own

    housing-programme for their

    employees.

    What looks like an oversized

    villa actually is a home for

    12 families. These photos

    show a development of 22

    supervillas for Eisenbahn ( the

    railroadcompany in Ljubljana).

    Nowadays these appartments

    are mostly inhabited by children

    and grandchildren of the

    original employees. Most of

    them obtained the apartment

    at a favourable rate in 1991.

    Neither an individual garden

    nor a garage is available for the

    inhabitants.

  • 38 Creativity in Collectivity

    60

    60

    1.3. creativity in collectivity

    To conclude, the Socio-Political background of Slovenia resulted

    in a rich patrimonium of neighboorhoods and housing typologies.

    The Socialist experiment was much different from the Communism

    of the USSR and this lead to a specific architecture. What binded

    the different architects over time was their quest for creativity in

    collectivity.

  • THE SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT 39

  • THE ARRIVAL OF CAPITALISM2.

  • 42 BTC

    New Function for a Logistic HubBTC was the largest goods and transport centre of Yugoslavia

    consisting of multiple rows of 160-meter-long-warehouses,

    running along the railway tracks. After the independence of

    Slovenia in 1991 and the introduction of the free market, the

    site was privatised. The owners covered the railway tracks with

    asphalt, converting the site into a vast shopping district, marking

    the arrival of capitalism.

    Today BTC has around 50.000 visitors a day one third of the

    amount that visits the city centre located three kilometres

    further.1 No wonder it is so attractive to the public, BTC has

    far more to offer than just shopping: an aquapark, a theatre,

    a hotel, a beach volley-ball-field, a dentist, a veterinarian, a

    language school etc. Most of the activities of BTC are contained

    within huge generic boxes which do not permeate any daylight.

    Transport between the boxes happens exclusively by car, since

    going on foot between the long blank frontages is unpleasant and

    even dangerous given the lack of pavements. After nine p.m., BTC

    becomes completely desolated, with the exception of the dance-

    hall, cinema and casino at the fringe...

    2.1. Btc

    0 1 km 2 km

    Panorama of BTC. A

    The location of BTC.

    1 Stani I., Municipal Coordination of Brownfield Development: The Case of Partnership martinska in Ljubljana, Presentation on Cobraman Project Conference, Brownfield Regeneration, Poland, 2012.

    A http://wiki.upcscavenger.com/wikimedia/panorama-city--129612934/#page=media, 18 14.01.28.

  • 43THE ARRIVAL OF cApITALIsm

    The transformation of BTC: from the most important logistic hub of Yugoslavia into the biggest shopping centre of Slovenia. The first dependent on the railway, the second on the ring road.

    1951

    1991

  • 44 BTC

  • 45THE ARRIVAL OF cApITALIsm

    19 hours at BTCThis photomontage is the result of 19 hours at BTC, from 9 in the

    morning when the shops open, till 4 in the night, when the night

    club closes. Then BTC becomes completely desolated...

  • 46 BTC

    Wide range of Shopping typologiesThe enormous diversity of shops guarantees that one can literally

    find anything in the shortest time possible at BTC. The efficiency

    is reached by the application of roughly three shopping typologies.

    Firstly, there are two hard-core shopping malls. These buildings

    are nothing short of being a city within a city, literally having

    squares, streets and alleys within a single volume. There is even

    a multi-storey car-park attached so that one never has to set foot

    outside. The shopping mall makes the rest of the city obsolete.

    Secondly there are the converted generic warehouses, surrounded

    by surface parking. The main shop is indicated by a screamy

    frontage and only a few smaller shops are accommodated in the

    long blank sides of the building.

    Thirdly, there is even an open-air-market at the fringe of

    BTC. The advantage of the last two shopping typologies is the

    connection with outside whilst shopping which revives the streets

    and gives social control, so that an urban character is obtained.

    A fourth shopping typolgy is recently constructed: the tower of

    BTC has a comercial base.

    B http://www.btc-city.com/ 14.01.28.

    C http://www.visitljubljana.com/si/imenik/1826/detail.html 14.01.28.

    Shopping mall at BTC. The architecture imitates a historic town center with squares and alleys. B

    Fresh fruit and vegetable market at BTC. C

    The shopping typology of the converted warehouse. The several shop entrances are indicated by red arrows.

  • 47THE ARRIVAL OF cApITALIsm

    0 m 100 m 200 m 300 m 500 m

    Scale 1 : 5000

    0 100 m 200 m 400 m

    3

    4

    2

    1

  • 48 BTC

    Metropolitan VibrancyBTC is a clear-cut case of the Ringcultuur that the Dutch

    architect Willem Jan Neutelings identified around European

    cities almost 30 years ago.2 After extensive research on the ring

    culture in Antwerp, he published an article on the topic covering

    a Koolhaasian description of the phenomenon, with a clear tone

    of admiration. According to Neutelings, the old city centres with

    their medieval structures, are no longer capable of absorbing

    the new programme of modern life. City centres have become

    merely frozen open-air museums - nostalgic reminiscent of

    passed cultures. It is the ring zone were modern mass-culture

    is put into practice: concert halls, stadiums, theme parks, plot

    gardens, jogging tracks, swimming pools, mass-furniture shops,

    expos, congress halls, traffic knots, highways and parking

    lots. Neutelings concludes with a paradox: the ring has become

    the centre of the contemporary city where work, leisure and

    distribution of the mass-culture is performed.

    As we strolled inside the historic centre of Ljubljana, we indeed

    had the impression that the centre seems to be more of a tourist

    attraction then a well-functioning heart. The city centre has a

    pleasant town-like charm but not the metropolitan atmosphere

    that one would ex