Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

10
Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe CoDe Joint European Master Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development in Comparative Local Development

Transcript of Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Page 1: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Bruno DallagoGraz, 10 June 2010

CoDeCoDeJoint European MasterJoint European Master

in Comparative Local Developmentin Comparative Local Development

Page 2: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 2

Mission and approachMission and approach

1. Balances and combines global and idiosyncratic issues and approaches;

2. Integrates codified and tacit knowledge and competences with theory and case-studies;

3. Interdisciplinary and comparative;

4. Integrates teaching and research.

Page 3: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 33

Main featuresMain features

• In line with Bologna process: 2 years/120 ECTS• Students’ mobility:

–1st year: Coordinating University –2nd year:

• 1st term: EU Rotation University; • 2nd term: any Partner University (optional modules offered based on partners’ areas of excellence).

• Lecturers’ mobility integrate students’ mobility;

• Jointness and embeddedness;• Spillovers and Alumni.

Page 4: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 44

ActivitiesActivities

• Pre-programme and introductory course

• Modules and laboratories : mandatory (60 ECTS) and elective (30)

• Internship and research (10), dissertation (20)

• Group work, field visits, online teaching and methodology

Page 5: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 5

The ConsortiumThe Consortium

Page 6: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 66

GovernanceGovernance

• Network of Partners with equal rights and duties (one partner-one vote);

• Unity and consistency of activities implementation and budget management;

• Trust building: making decisions on the basis of shared rules and selected unanimity rule;

• Assessment and adaptation.

Page 7: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 7

Strength of AccreditationStrength of Accreditation

• Coordination among accreditation bodies;

• Accreditation experts, academic and subject experts, student representative;

• Interaction between the Accreditation Committee and the course;

• Self-evaluation report with standardised grid;

• Site visit meeting and interactionwith all the partners.

Page 8: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 8

Weaknesses Weaknesses

• Lack of an Italian Accreditation Body;

• National norms fail to offer clear joint procedures;

• Self-evaluation report questions not always clear, leading to misinterpretation;

• Uneven implementation of time deadlines.

Page 9: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 9

What can be improvedWhat can be improved

• Inclusion of a comparative glossary and explanation of technical terminology and unambiguous guidelines;

• Participation of employers for assessing employability perspectives;

• Evaluation of jointness and value to substantive issues and standards in respect of fundamental formal ones.

Page 10: Bruno Dallago Graz, 10 June 2010 CoDe Joint European Master in Comparative Local Development.

Master CoDe 10

ChallengesChallenges

• Improving operational knowledge of and interaction among national requirements and regulation;

• Compatibility of national regulations and convergence of work styles/timing also in specific areas or issues;

• Convergence towards a common European track for joint programmes;

• Employers’ and third countries’ acceptance of joint degrees.