Brownstown Middle - Alliance of Downriver Watersheds · Brownstown Middle Brownstown Middle School...
Transcript of Brownstown Middle - Alliance of Downriver Watersheds · Brownstown Middle Brownstown Middle School...
Brownstown Middle
Brownstown Middle School Green Roof Monitoring Project
Presentation to Alliance of Downriver Watersheds
October 18, 2012
Scott Isenberg & Donald D. Carpenter
Lawrence Technological University
Minimize the negative impact a conventional roof has on our environment
Conserve Energy ($$) and Atmosphere (heat island
effect)
Extend Roof Lifespan (2 times conventional) up to 50 years
Dramatically reduce rain water runoff and improve water quality and erosion issues
Provide habitat for surrounding wildlife
Improve aesthetics of affected area
Introduce unique science curriculum (environmental
science) and provide unique space for learning (on
roof)
Education!
Why did WBSD chose Green Roofs?
Project Goals
1. Determine the overall volume of precipitation retained and detained by the green roof (water quantity)
2. Determine the water quality variable attenuation capabilities, including total suspended solids, pH and temperature (water quality)
3. Determine the reduction in ambient temperature (air quality)
4. Establish how a long-term monitoring station capable of determining green roof performance is a key feature in green infrastructure community education programs and can be integrated into public science curriculum (social impact)
Green Roofs Installed at BMS
Testing Areas • Green roof area was selected because of ease of access,
clear delineation of drainage area and uniform green roof coverage.
• Green roof area: 880 ft2
• Asphalt roof : 3457 ft2
Testing Equipment • Hobo Weather Stations on each roof • 3 Temperature gauges at each station: Air, Roof,
and Drain • A tipping bucket rain gauge was attached to the
green roof station • Data was collected every 5 minutes
Testing Equipment • Palmer Bowlus flumes were installed • ISCO 4230 Bubbler Flow meter • ISCO GLS Compact Composite Sampler • Sampling was triggered by flow rate • Samples were taken at volume intervals
Storm Response • Respond to storm event within 24 hours of
storm • Approx. (2) 200 ml samples collected from
each roof (container stirred before sampling) – (Total Suspended Solids)
• pH tested with NexSens pH/Temp Sensor
Results: Temperature • Black roof temperature were 10 to 20 degrees higher than
the green roof • Average day and night time air temperatures did not show
much variability
Results: Temperature
Results: Temperature
Results: pH • Average black roof pH: 6.26 • Average green roof pH: 7.05 • Michigan natural waters: 6.5 -7.5
Results: TSS • Conservative average green roof TSS: 2 mg/L • Average black roof TSS: 17 mg/L
Results: Flow, Cv by storm size Green roof
Black roof
• Average green roof Cv: 0.481 • Average black roof Cv: 0.885 • Approximately 53% of rainfall was retained by the
green roof compared with approximately 18% of rainfall that fell on the traditional black asphalt roof.
Results: Centroid Delay • Average delay for the black roof: 10 minutes • Average delay for green roof: 1 hour
Flow: Peak Reduction
Sample Storm Hydrographs Large Storm Event
Sample Storm Hydrographs Small Storm Event
Summary • Green roof retained approximately 53% of the rainfall
received • 100% retention of storm events less than 0.10” • pH averaging 1.5 higher for the green roof • With 13,000 ft2 green roof, 19.1 lbs to 1.3 lbs • Average daytime surface temps: 10 to 20 degrees
cooler for fall and spring