BrookingsPD Response

download BrookingsPD Response

of 3

Transcript of BrookingsPD Response

  • 7/25/2019 BrookingsPD Response

    1/3

    {01951015.1} - 1 -

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

    SOUTHERN DIVISION

    o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o

    TAMRA WELBIG,

    Plaintiff,

    vs.

    CITY OF BROOKINGS, JEFF MILLER,

    JORDAN HANSEN, JORDAN MCCASKILL,and JUSTINA HILMOE,

    Defendants.

    :

    :

    :

    :

    :

    CIV. 15-4085

    ANSWER ON BEHALF OF

    DEFENDANTS

    o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o

    Defendants City of Brookings (City), Jeff Miller, Jordan Hansen, Jordan McCaskill,

    and Justina Hilmoe (n/k/a Justina Diamond), for their joint answer to Plaintiffs Complaint, state:

    1. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

    2. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Plaintiff's Complaint

    except allegations that are specifically admitted or qualified.

    3. All Defendants are protected by the doctrine of qualified immunity and thus

    immune from suit by Plaintiff in this case.

    4. Defendants admit paragraphs 6, 7, 8, and 9 of Plaintiffs Complaint.

    5. Defendants specifically deny that Defendants, or any of them, deprived Plaintiff

    of any right, privilege, or immunity protected by the United States Constitution or otherwise

    injured or damaged her in any respect.

    Case 4:15-cv-04085-LLP Document 10 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 29

  • 7/25/2019 BrookingsPD Response

    2/3

    Case Number: CIV. 15-4085

    Answer on Behalf of Defendants

    {01951015.1} - 2 -

    6. Defendants deny that Plaintiff has been damaged or injured in the manner or

    extent claimed in her Complaint.

    7. Defendants specifically deny that Defendants, or any of them, assaulted, battered,

    or falsely imprisoned or used excessive force or otherwise violated any of Plaintiffs rights.

    8. Defendants specifically deny that Plaintiffs Complaint states a claim which

    would entitle her to punitive or exemplary damages against Defendants, or any of them.

    9. Defendants specifically deny that Plaintiff has a claim against the City of

    Brookings.

    WHEREFORE, Defendants request that this Court enter its order dismissing Plaintiffs

    Complaint on its merits, with prejudice, and that Plaintiff recover nothing, and that these

    Defendants recover their costs, attorneys fees, and disbursements incurred in connection with

    the defense of this case, and for such further relief as the Court deems appropriate.

    Dated this 28th

    day of May, 2015.

    WOODS, FULLER, SHULTZ & SMITH P.C.

    By /s/ Gary P. Thimsen

    Gary P. ThimsenPO Box 5027

    300 South Phillips Avenue, Suite 300

    Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5027Phone (605) 336-3890

    Fax (605) 339-3357

    [email protected] for Defendants

    Case 4:15-cv-04085-LLP Document 10 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 30

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/25/2019 BrookingsPD Response

    3/3

    Case Number: CIV. 15-4085

    Answer on Behalf of Defendants

    {01951015.1} - 3 -

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on the 28th

    day of May, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing

    Answer on Behalf of Defendants, with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will

    automatically send e-mail notification of such filing to the following:

    Rick L. RamstadCrew & Crew, P.C.

    [email protected]

    Aaron D. [email protected]

    Attorneys for Plaintiff

    /s/ Gary P. ThimsenOne of the attorneys for Defendants

    Case 4:15-cv-04085-LLP Document 10 Filed 05/28/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 31

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]