Brochure final english[1]

83
IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21 This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission Improvement through research in Inclusive schools 1. THE IRIS PROJECT 2. INCLUSION AND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION 3. CONCEPTIONS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SOME EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 3.1. Introduction 3.2. School for all, inclusive school and educational organisation 3.3. Inclusive classroom: practices of teaching, values, support for teachers, self- efficacy beliefs and difficulties 3.4. Inclusive classroom, school and community: Barriers, benefits and resources 3.5. Strategies/Actions to Inclusive classrooms 3.6. Community and Inclusion 4. SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR PUPILS WITH SEN 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Assessment of disabilities in some European countries 4.3. Inclusive Assessment practices in some European countries 4.4. Individual educational plans 4.5. Curricular adaptations 5. NEW CONCEPTS ON TEACHER TRAINING, CLASSROOM CLIMATE, TEAM WORK 5.1. Classroom climate in Inclusive settings 5.2. Introduction, defining the concept of classroom climate 5.3. Factors of influence and consequences on climate of classroom 5.4. Climate and language 5.5. Classroom climate –impact on different levels 5.6. Creating and maintaining an Inclusive Climate on classroom 5.7. Some ideas about teacher training 5.8. Team work in Inclusive Classrooms 5.9. New concepts on teacher training: Inclusive assessment

description

O IRIS (Melhoria através da Investigação na Escola Inclusiva) é um Projecto Comenius Europeu com o foco na Inclusão e nos progressos escolares, abrangendo todas as crianças numa escola para todos. O Projecto IRIS iniciou-se no fim de 2006 e termina em 1 de Outubro de 2009. A Áustria e a Bélgica coordenam as actividades do Projecto. A equipa Projecto IRIS é composta por 7 parceiros a trabalhar em grupos temáticos e os membros do grupo têm mudado, bem como os sistemas evoluído. Toda a equipa do Projecto se reúne de 6 em 6 meses para partilhar informação sobre o desenvolvimento, como um todo colaborativo.

Transcript of Brochure final english[1]

Page 1: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Improvement through research in Inclusive schools

1. THE IRIS PROJECT

2. INCLUSION AND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION

3. CONCEPTIONS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SOME EUROPEAN COUNTRIES3.1. Introduction3.2. School for all, inclusive school and educational organisation3.3. Inclusive classroom: practices of teaching, values, support for teachers, self-

efficacy beliefs and difficulties3.4. Inclusive classroom, school and community: Barriers, benefits and resources3.5. Strategies/Actions to Inclusive classrooms3.6. Community and Inclusion

4. SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR PUPILS WITH SEN4.1. Introduction4.2. Assessment of disabilities in some European countries4.3. Inclusive Assessment practices in some European countries4.4. Individual educational plans4.5. Curricular adaptations

5. NEW CONCEPTS ON TEACHER TRAINING, CLASSROOM CLIMATE, TEAM WORK 5.1. Classroom climate in Inclusive settings5.2. Introduction, defining the concept of classroom climate5.3. Factors of influence and consequences on climate of classroom5.4. Climate and language5.5. Classroom climate –impact on different levels5.6. Creating and maintaining an Inclusive Climate on classroom5.7. Some ideas about teacher training5.8. Team work in Inclusive Classrooms5.9. New concepts on teacher training: Inclusive assessment

6. TEACHING INCLUSIVELY – The Aide Memoire, a new proposal to support and evaluate teachers’ practices 6.1. Introduction6.2. Teaching inclusively6.3. The Aide Memoire and the Fit to learn bookmark6.4. Evaluation of the tool6.5. Practical use and Case studies

7. GLOSSARY

8. REFERENCES

9. AUTHORS

10. CREDITS

Page 2: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

1. The IRIS PROJECT

IRIS (Improvement through Research in the Inclusive School) is a European Comenius

project with a focus on Inclusion and School improvements) embracing all children in a

school for all. The IRIS-project started at the end of 2006 and ends October 1st, 2009. Austria

and Belgium are coordinating the project activities. The IRIS project team has consisted of

seven partners working in thematic groups, and the group membership has changed as the

systems evolved. The whole project team has met every sixth month to share information

about development as a collaborative whole.

The overall aim of the project is to develop, implement and disseminate materials for initial

and in-service training for teachers and other educational staff. The materials were

continuously piloted in each partner country and both the process of the project and the

materials were evaluated step by step. The purpose is to develop a multidimensional

approach to improve the teaching and learning of all pupils. However, in order to improve

teaching and learning new attitudes among teachers and other school staff need to be

developed (e.g. headmasters and other professionals such as psychologists, therapists,

nurses, assistants) based on research and with a focus on an understanding of all pupils’

strengths and weaknesses in everyday life situations. The tool will also assist the teachers in

improving their capacities for research, evaluation and assessment, i.e. teachers need tools

for their teaching tasks. The diversity of the pupils must in this context be regarded as a

resource, not a problem. This will support effective planning and intervention, including the

use of an Individual Education Plan (IEP), for all pupils in the inclusive classroom.

In the course of three years the IRIS project has collated and identified the CONCEPTIONS

OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION AND PRACTICES in some European countries, and based on

this research has developed a training package, which can be used by teachers throughout

Europe and act as a catalyst for changing practice across the European community.

The teachers’ training package contains modules on CLASSROOM CLIMATE, TEAM WORK

IN INCLUSIVE CLASSROOMS, SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN INCLUSIVE SETTINGS,

INCLUSIVE ASSESSMENT, INDIVIDUAL EDUCATIONAL PLANS AND CURRICULAR

ADAPTATIONS IN INCLUSIVE CLASSROOMS, STRATEGIES AND PRACTICE IN

INCLUSIVE CLASSROOMS and the AIDE MEMOIR together with the “FIT TO LEARN

BOOKMARK” as a new tool to support and evaluate inclusive classroom practice.

The cultural variety of the partner countries influenced the design of the instruments and the

final documents are adapted to fit the different systems. For further information see the IRIS

Page 3: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

homepage: www.irisproject.eu.

.

The target groups for the project will mainly be teachers and other professionals, who work

with children within the school community and also parents, who as equal partners, play a

vital role in the education of their children. The training modules will vary in their degree of

interest for each group.

This means that the professionals are the end-users of the designed tools and these tools

will successively improve the situation for the pupils in the inclusive classroom. The

instrument will thus affect both the end-users and the users.

The IRIS project is based on two key concepts: research and inclusion. Research is the

basis for decision-making in practical work, which means that theory and practical

experiences go hand-in-hand.

Page 4: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

2. INCLUSION AND INCLUSIVE CLASSROOM PRACTICE

Inclusion is a process: it respects and values difference. Everyone has a part to play

in society.

Each grain of sand can become a diamond given the right environment. Inclusive education

offers a multidimensional approach to the development of competencies and abilities,

reducing barriers to learning and participation for all pupils.

This process makes it possible for each person to achieve their full potential and live a

fulfilled life.

At the core of inclusive education is the human right to education. This right is pronounced in

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.

Equally important is the right of children not to be discriminated (Article 2, Convention on the

Rights of the Child, UN 1989).

Therefore all children have the right to receive the kind of education that does not

discriminate on grounds of disability, ethnicity, religion, language, gender, capabilities and so

on.

Inclusive education involves all young people, with and without specific needs, learning

together in ordinary pre-school provision, schools, colleges and universities, with appropriate

networks of support.

Inclusion has to be seen as a process of addressing and responding to the diversity of needs

of all learners. This is achieved through increasing participation in learning, cultures and

communities and reducing exclusion within and from education (Booth, 1996; Brodin &

Lindstrand, 2007; Ljusberg, 2009).

Inclusion involves changes and modifications in content, approaches, structures and

strategies. The common vision has to cover all children of an age range and it is the

responsibility of the regular school system to educate all children (UNESCO, 1994)

Inclusion means enabling all pupils to participate in the life and work of mainstream

institutions to the best of their abilities, whatever their needs.

The philosophy of education that encompasses the needs of all pupils can be said to rest on

3 base lines:

A holistic view of each pupil

The principle of non-segregating measures www.shapesofmind.ca

Specific needs as seen in relation to the demands from the environment

Page 5: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Inclusive education is of uppermost importance because everyone - whatever his/her specific

learning needs - has a part to play in society. Education is part of the rest of pupil's lives.

Those in need of specific support can, and are, being educated in ordinary schools with

appropriate support. There are many different ways of achieving this.

Resolutions and legislation such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948),the

Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989),the United Nations Standard Rules on the

Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (1993),the Salamanca declaration

(1994), the Dakaar agreement (2000),the Convention on the Rights of Persons with

Disabilities (2008) demand development towards inclusive schools. Yet fifteen years after the

Salamanca declaration inclusive education is still a faraway concept for many schools,

teachers and pupils.

Effective inclusion demands a change of focus from the child to the school and its

community.

Inclusive practice requires the teacher to become much broader in outlook and approach and

involves more collaboration and teamwork throughout the school.

3. CONCEPTIONS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SOME EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

3.1 Introduction

Pupils attending school have different skills and they also come from different cultural

and social environments, family and language. Thus, the school must recognise these

differences and meet the diverse needs of their pupils. This requires internal changes of the

school and of society itself so that school becomes to some extent a reflection of society.

(Grácio et al, 2009).

In several countries legislation has been drawn up in the sense that schools should

include all, regardless of its competences and limitations, taking the role of promoter of equal

opportunities.

Although the current schools serve a more diverse pupils’ population, inclusive education

is still in the process of development. Firstly, because this concept is relatively new and still

requires definition and assessment. Secondly, because inclusion is one of the most complex

changes for schools to manage.

In the school context, inclusion is a challenge that needs a change of attitudes and

practices, especially when we want active participation of all pupils whilst ensuring an

Page 6: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

effective integration of all children and young people in school.

Teachers and educational staff in general are guided by their values, beliefs and attitudes

to change itself, so they should not only be convinced that the change in question is

worthwhile, but also understand the reasons that justify and support it (Burstein, Sears,

Wilcoxen, Cabello & Spagna, 2004). Several researchers believe that more important than

implementing a general educational policy of Inclusion, it is crucial that educators focus on

finding answers and services promoters of inclusion (Fennick & Liddy, 2001; Kavala &

Forness, 2000; King-Sears & Cummings, 1996). However, as in any educational reform,

inclusion implies a reform in the organisational structure of schools and on the roles and

responsibilities of teachers.

What teachers do depends on the conceptions that they have about inclusion. In this

regard, we start from the assumption that the practices of school teachers express their

conceptions of inclusion.

Indeed, research about teachers’ thinking has allowed the understanding of the

relationship between the teacher's pedagogical activity and its representations,

interpretations and values (for the school, the pupils, the content of the programme, to their

teaching function and educational events). As Clark and Peterson state: teachers’ actions are

in a large part caused by teachers’ thought processes, which then in turn affect teachers’

actions (1986, p. 259).

If we want to activate changes in inclusive education we must start from knowledge of

reality that allows us to know the thinking, practices, experiences and context in which it

occurs, and the real needs of those that are key elements of their promotion. Accordingly,

within the IRIS project we started by conducting an exploratory research aimed to access the

meanings and practices of inclusion in some European countries (Grácio et al, 2008;

Candeias et al, 2007, 2008). The empirical study was conducted in a phenomenographic

perspective using the descriptions of qualitatively different forms of understanding or

experiencing certain phenomena (Marton, 1986; Linder, & Marshall, 2003). The phenomenon

in focus relates to the inclusive school and the conceptions of the participants about it. The

participants of different European countries were considered as holders of good inclusive

practices.

We considered a minimum of two/three participants from each country/ partner of

IRIS project. All participants interviewed belonged to the world of school or educational

community in a given country (e.g., teachers, technicians, subjects related to the

administration and the educational community or belonging to associations or local

authorities). The first interviewed was always a teacher flagged as an example of good

Page 7: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

practice in inclusion. Each of the interviewees should indicate a range of other people in

possession of good practice listing them in descending order of evaluation. Thus, the

subjects interviewed were successively indicated by the previous participant interviewed as

promoters of good practices for inclusion.

Globally we interviewed 19 participants. As there were two partners in Portugal

(Évora and Porto), 31.5% of interviews are from the Portuguese participants and 68.5%

belong to the other countries (Austria, Belgium, Sweden, Spain, UK).

In order to explore what inclusion means and how it can be developed, an interview

guide was built, which was structured with five major themes: conception of inclusive school

and educational policy; classroom inclusive conception; barriers, resources and benefits of

an inclusive school, classroom and community; strategies / actions to promote a school and

a classroom inclusive and role and contributions of the community for the implementation of

inclusive school.

1. The interviews were conducted individually and audio taped. They were fully

transcribed, translated into English and analysed. The content analysis led to the

development of a thematic analysis and categorical grid. This content analysis was

guided by considering all variations in the speech of the subjects. A quantitative

analysis was also carried out based on the occurrences registration.

This study and its results had clear implications for practices which have been the

starting point for the development of various products including the support systems for

pupils with disabilities, teacher training, assessment tools and aide memoir.

3.2 School for all, inclusive school and educational organization

Three conceptions of a school for all became strongly evident. This emerged primarily

as a school that accepts and integrates all, a school marked by equal opportunities for

learning and a school that satisfies different needs. The school for all is perceived as being

guided by values, individual action and acceptance of all pupils, as a promoter of

development, construction of goals and success, area of equal opportunities and answer to

varying needs. It is also marked by certain relational features and resources. (Grácio et al.

2009a).

In short, the school for all goes beyond the inclusion of pupils with specific

educational needs. It emerges both as a means to ensure equal opportunities, which is not

only for access to education, but also to promote the effective development and success of

everyone regardless of their characteristics and conditions of departure, while taking them

into account.

Page 8: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Among the concepts of an inclusive school the most focused ideas are that it accepts

and integrates all children regardless of their difficulties, it has adequate resources and it is

equal to a school for all. There are still more or less residual discourses which express the

ideas that the inclusive school is marked by certain practices of teaching and relational

aspects. It is a potential promoter of individuals and of an inclusive society, based on certain

values responding to different needs and geographically close to the population that it

serves.

The school for all and the inclusive school are not perceived in the same way,

although some participants consider them as synonymous. By comparison, the inclusive

school is sometimes conceptualised in a more restricted way, in that the focus is, above all,

the integration of children with disabilities.

As stated by Ainscow, Booth and Dyson “people may be happy to agree on values, say

those concerned with equity and participation, until they start to look in detail at their

implications for practice” (2006, p.3). We will then progressively approach closer to the real

contexts in which the inclusion takes place and to the participants’ visions about them.

Regarding the organisation of school education the following aspects were explored:

current educational policy; the advantages/disadvantages of a flexible and adapted

curriculum; school's educational project as well as the existent measures promoting the

inclusive school.

The most evident concepts are related to the idea that the educational policy does not

promote an inclusive school and that the reasons for this are due not only to school, but also

to government and legislative obstacles. Approximately 81% of the responses by the

participants about the relationship between educational policy and promoting inclusive school

are related to aspects that point to weaknesses and obstacles to the reality of a truly

inclusive school. On the other hand, the responses that expressed the idea that education

policy promoted inclusive schooling have few references relating to the existence of

legislation and curricular adaptations. This shows the perception of a social, political,

economic and educationally less developed context for inclusion in Austria, Belgium,

Catalonia/Spain, Portugal, Sweden and in the UK.

Participants clearly recognise, as beneficial to the pupils, that there are flexible and

adapted curricula. However, they also strongly list the increasing difficulties that those

curricula have to teachers referring to the rising of insecurity and stress. The conceptions

that the flexible and adapted curricula have advantages for pupils and present disadvantages

for teachers are most stated. This latter aspect directed us both for the construction of

materials to support teachers and to the conceptualisation of an initial and continuing training

Page 9: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

programme that provides the conceptual and practical tools, which reduces the uncertainty

and helps to develop inclusive practice.

It appears that the educational project for schools is still seen as an incipient

instrument in promoting an inclusive school. Besides, it highlights the need to implement

concrete measures in schools that allow the existence of an inclusive school (e.g., space,

materials, human and material resources, cooperation of teachers and other practitioners) as

well as more general measures (such as those relating to teacher training or the overall

planning of the inclusion, in broad and social terms).

Existing measures in schools to promote a more inclusive school are related to

teachers` teamwork, technicians to support the teacher, practices of teaching/learning and

existence of specific equipment. The lack of practices and measures in school pointed out

are related to curriculum, identification and evaluation and with the cooperation of the school

community (Grácio et al. 2009a).

3.3 Inclusive classroom: practices of teaching, values, support for teachers, self-

efficacy beliefs and difficulties

The practice of teaching seen by teachers as promoting inclusion are reported to two

contexts: one relating to the classroom in general and the other to teaching/learning

practices.

In the context of the classroom as a promoter of inclusion the most referred aspects

are the integration of pupils with learning difficulties in the regular curriculum, the respect for

difference and the promotion of integration.

Concerning the practice of teaching/learning offered in an inclusive classroom there

are references to a social learning and adaptation of lessons to the groups of pupils. All the

participants highlighted a strong respect for difference and tolerance as values that promote

inclusion.

Technicians for educational support to pupils with specific needs are the most

available as support for teachers working together inside the classroom.

These teachers consider themselves as effective in promoting an inclusive work

environment and as models of inclusion.

The participating teachers believe that the greatest difficulties were connected with

the absence or scarcity of skilled human resources, with the large number of pupils per class

and the need for a change of mentality. The other educational staff, besides teachers, list the

Page 10: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

institutional barriers, lack of appropriate educational policies and specialist resources and

difficulties of managing the classroom.

3.4 Inclusive classroom, school and community: Barriers, benefits and resources

Material resources are seen as the biggest barrier or obstacle to the promotion of an

inclusive classroom followed by difficulties related to values, social attitudes and practices of

teaching. However, a meta analysis of the various categories identified can find four main

groups of meanings listed in descending order as follows: education (e.g., practices of

teaching, teacher's behaviour, organisational aspects of classroom, no personalised space),

lack of resources, values and social attitudes, pupils’ background and relational aspects.

These findings summarise the central role of the teacher and its action in making a

classroom truly inclusive (Grácio et al., 2009b).

The main barriers for an inclusive school are mostly related to resources, the school

itself, the attitudes and beliefs and educational practices. Regarding an inclusive community,

the major obstacles are the social values and attitudes, acceptance, undeveloped

partnerships with the community and too little cooperation family/ school.

Although the participants were only asked about what are the main resources for the

promotion of a inclusive classroom, school or community were, their replies are organised

around two axes of meaning: one on the resources that exist in each context, and the other

on the resources they consider necessary to the existence or the promotion of inclusion in

these contexts.

In the inclusive classroom context the existence of various resources are mentioned:

materials, space, accessibility, different professionals, laws, attitudes, collaboration between

teachers, teaching practices and the existence of good practices. However, the existence of

specialised or support teachers that may assist the class teacher is the most mentioned

existing resource. The second most mentioned resource is internal, referring to attitudes

linked to willingness to include. The collaboration between teachers is the third resource

pointed out as a promoter of inclusion in the context of the classroom.

The resources considered necessary for the existence of inclusive classrooms are:

reducing the teacher/pupil ratio, teacher training, diverse resources and adequate classroom

environment. From all these, the resources in general and the teacher training are the most

mentioned.

The existing resources in the inclusive school are also related to spaces, teaching

practices, motivation and teachers’ willingness for inclusion, teamwork, specialised and

support teachers and legislation. The most listed resources for the promotion of an inclusive

Page 11: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

school related to the existence of: (a) resources in general and specialised teachers, (b)

teaching practice, motivation and willingness of teachers, (c) team work of teachers. Again

the subjects interviewed, in a completely spontaneous way, indicate the needs for a truly

inclusive school: (a) resources, (b) change of mentality and desire for inclusion, (c) teacher

training; (d) parents training and teachers dynamism.

In an inclusive community the resources indicated are: community participation and

social workers, law and the existence of various resources. Necessary resources are values,

behaviours and attitudes, resources in general, increase of information on inclusion and the

need for institutional support / education policies , effective planning as well as will and

motivation.

Briefly, for the European participants there are already some resources that contribute

to an inclusive classroom, school and community. However, from the data analysis is clear

that the needs are plenty and the resources scarce and incomplete.

The benefits of an inclusive classroom are listed in descending order of popularity, the

development of pupils’ values, individualised learning, participation, pupils’ own experience of

inclusion, reduction of differences and working interdisciplinary.

In what concerns the benefits of an inclusive school, the most prominent are the

development of values, attitudes and behaviour. The reference that school can become itself

for society and the educational success that it promotes is one of the benefits. Other

benefits, such as, the prevention of risks, the development of cooperation and solidarity

among teachers and the increase of their motivation are also seen.

The benefits of an inclusive community are understood, especially, as gains in the

development of values, attitudes and behaviour. In this context an inclusive community is

regarded as contributing to the creation of a new model of society. The reduction of violence

and marginalisation, and a more equitable school are also referred to as advantages of an

inclusive community.

In summary, the participants highlighted as the most important benefit of the inclusive

classroom, school and community the development of values, attitudes and behaviour by

giving them a crucial role.

3.5 Strategies/Actions for an Inclusive Classroom

The strategies/actions for an inclusive classroom were explored according to four

main aspects: tools, social strategies for inclusion, role/contribution of the team work and

role/contribution of teacher training.

Page 12: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Evaluation of pupils with disabilities should involve a multidisciplinary team –

teachers, specialists and community agents - that uses methods/instruments that should be

holistic with a technical language adapted for everybody, but objective and rigorous to

improve diagnosis, evaluation and intervention. Likewise intervention should be based on

tools that should be simple and functional with a common language, easy accessibility and

ability to be rigorous in the evaluation, diagnosis and intervention, by a multidisciplinary

team, in order to plan and organise individualised plans and programs of intervention.

The most frequent social strategies of inclusion indicated were: (a) Promote

objectives from inclusion (equality, respect for potential and educating for difference); (b)

Improve values to encourage inclusion (acceptance, and the respect for the developmental

stage of the pupil through the project of learning for each pupil independently of the

differences);(c) Knowledge of the ability concept and potential about pupils with disabilities;

(d) Cooperation between school-family-community; (d) Educative practice

(Teaching/Learning) as cooperative learning, integration and reflexive practice; (e) Socio-

economics conditions to support families and to improve material conditions.

Team work should have specific characteristics to improve inclusive practices as with

regular interdisciplinary work, in order to improve communication, functioning and

cooperation and tolerance. The functions of team work should involve curricular adaptations

that support the teachers’ practices and the cooperation with the families and community.

Training of families about the characteristics of the pupils is seen as important to

understand the differences between pupils, namely to give them information about their

difficulties and their potential, thereby encouraging inclusion within the school and the

community.

The teacher training is considered important at several stages: initial training, specific

training and continued professional development. The domains of that formation are

knowledge, personal and interpersonal abilities and practical competences (Pomar, et al,

2009).

3.6 Community and inclusion

Regarding the community the analysed information was organised into two themes:

role/contribution of the community to inclusion and facilitating attitudes among the community

(Chaleta et al, 2009).

It is considered that the community can contribute to the promotion of an inclusive

school essentially by providing resources, adopting favourable educational and social

supporting measures, by changing values and providing appropriate training for educational

Page 13: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

staff.

Positive attitudes and values towards inclusion and changing mainstream attitudes

were regarded as important to facilitating a change in community attitudes; to a lesser

degree, socio-professional integration. For these participants the community can contribute

and take an important role for a more inclusive education providing the necessary resources

to support inclusion and adopting specific measures at socio-political and educational levels.

In order to make this happen, it is necessary for the existence of favourable attitudes,

changing those that are obstacles and developing positive values regarding inclusion.

Generally we can conclude that participants recognise that the community has an

important role in building the inclusive school by providing resources, attitudes and values.

However, the need to establish partnerships and develop more widespread dialogues with

the various community agencies was not highlighted. This latter aspect is shown in several

studies as crucial to the deepening of the process of inclusion (Information Exchange, 1995,

Turner, 1996).

 

Page 14: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

4. SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR PUPILS WITH SPECIFIC NEEDS

4.1 Introduction

According to the United Nation’s (UN) Convention on Human Rights (1948) the right to

education is stressed for children, adolescents and adults. Education in today’s society

implies the need to keep up with the rapid technological development and demanding new

challenges. From official documents like the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC,

1989), the United Nation’s Standard Rules on Equalisation of Opportunities for Persons with

Disabilities (1993), the Salamanca declaration (1994), the Convention on the Rights of

Persons with Disabilities (2008) and various national documents in different countries,

education is highlighted as a human right for all. The most essential documents in relation to

the IRIS project is the CRC (1989), the Salamanca declaration (1994) and the Convention on

the Rights for persons with Disabilities (2008).

The official standpoint in these documents is to avoid excluding solutions and promote an

inclusive school for all children in a society for all. Also national documents in the different

countries such as curricula and school acts influence the official attitudes to inclusion in a

society. However, it is evident that the view on inclusion still differs in various countries and

communities.

The concepts integration and normalisation were discussed already in the fifties and sixties

and the main reason was the normalisation principle brought up by Nirje (2003). The main

idea was that persons with disabilities should be able to live in the same living conditions as

other children, adolescents and adults. A consequence of this principle was that institutions

and special hospitals in many countries were abolished and that children and adolescents

who had lived at institutions moved back home to their parents and attended regular schools.

Research on inclusion is still a hot area and there is in many countries a backlash with regard

to inclusion of children with disabilities in regular schools and the light is at present often on

the teacher. What is a good teacher? Are there any criteria to describe what makes a good

teacher? Will the need for special teachers in the regular school increase in the regular

school because teachers in the regular school today have poor knowledge about disabilities?

Nilholm (2003) suggests that special educators in their professionalism may label pupils as

deviants in order to justify their own existence. This idea is also supported by other

researchers (e.g. Skrtic, 1991; Wilson, 2002). One critical point is thus in-service training of

teachers (Douglas, 2001; Hegarty, 2004), another to increase the use of Information and

Communication Technologies (ICT) in school. There are still many variations concerning

Page 15: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

inclusion in Europe and these issues need to be discussed and highlighted both in research

and in practical work.

Support in school:

In all countries a special professional team consisting of specialists such as psychologists,

pedagogues, social workers, special education teachers and regular teachers are involved in

the decision-making of extra support. In some cases parents and pupils are involved.

Special education is in all partner countries mainly individualised, face-to-face education

(pupil and teacher) and is commonly used. Sometimes special education is also offered to

pupils without disabilities (with exception of Austria and Belgium) for longer or shorter periods

of time. Research in Sweden has shown that about 50 per cent of all pupils sometimes get

special educational support during the first nine school years (Ljusberg, 2005). The reason

for this extra support might be reading and writing difficulties, unhealthy conditions, illness,

speech therapy etc.

All technical aids (assistive devices) that a pupil needs to facilitate learning in school are free

of charge in most countries, but the Belgium representative points out something that is

essential viz. technical aids are free of charge in theory. This means that even if the devices

should be obtained free of charge if there is a need, they are not always free. Most schools

help the pupil to get an adapted immediate environment with adapted chairs, tables, benches

and special lights, hearing aids, computers and software.

The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is necessary in school and for

children with disabilities, it is important to have access to ICT. That ICT is promoted by the

authorities does thus not mean that they support it with additional funding. All these types of

support given as statements by authorities are extremely frustrating for those working in

practice as teachers. Without extra money – no real support is given.

4.2 Assessment of disabilities in some European Countries

In this work we assumed the definition of assessment proposed by the European Agency for

Development in Special Needs Education (Watkins, 2007, 14): Assessment refers to the

ways teachers and other people involved in a pupil’s education systematically collect and

then use information about that pupil’s level of achievement and/or development in different

areas of their educational experience (academic, behaviour and social).

Such definition covers all possible forms of initial and on-going assessment methods and

procedures. It also highlights the fact that there are different people involved in assessment.

Teachers, other school staff, external support staff, but parents and also pupils themselves

Page 16: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

can potentially be involved in assessment procedures. All people can use assessment

information in different ways, and that assessment information is not only concerned with the

pupil, but also the learning environment (and sometimes the home environment).

These presuppose a new theoretical approach to assessment and considerable changes in

teacher education and training. Given that, it is a challenge to us think, rethink and renew the

practice of identifying and assessing pupils with disabilities based on the new assumptions

about inclusive assessment.

In pursuing this goal we present a description of the evaluation procedures applied in several

European countries.

Since the Declaration of Salamanca a significant group of countries in Europe (Lloyd, 2006;

Shevlin & Rose, 2007; Watkins, 2007) and America (Elliot, Braden & White, 2001; Luke et al.,

2004; Paula & Enumo, 2007) seem to have similar education policies that can be considered

as having a potential impact upon assessment in inclusive education. For instance there are

national level educational goals with standards that pupils are expected to reach and

assessment evidence regarding pupil performance is used as a measure of school

performance. But, and this is, in our opinion the most important factor, there are no separate

assessment systems for pupils with specific educational needs apart from measures related

to initial assessment and individual needs identification (Watkins, 2007). This means that

pupils with disabilities are entitled to access national assessments in a way that is

appropriate for them i.e. assessments that must be appropriately modified.

Synchronisation between assessment policy and assessment practices implies a continuum

that must include: instruction in classes and schools, and home instructions. Setting

decisions must be made by an IEP team that includes parents, teachers, psychologists, and

other persons knowledgeable about the pupil (Candeias et al., 2008; Salvia & Ysseldyke &

Bolt, 2007). So, as these authors propose, inclusive assessment information should be used

«to make decisions about the extent to which educational programs in school systems are

working for all students, including students with disabilities» (2007, p. 17).

To improve inclusive assessment as practice in schools it will be necessary to change

assessment practices as well as the role of parents and teachers within assessment, as we

explain in the next points.

Assessment of pupils in inclusive settings is often concerned with diagnosis, as well as

associated with informing learning programmes. As, the European Agency for Development

in Special Needs Education – EADSE - (Watkins, 2007), proposes, national authorities

Page 17: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

should improves high stake assessments that are used for pupil, class or school evaluation,

as Madaus proposes in 1988: High stake assessments consists of tests and procedures that

provides information perceived by pupils, parents, teachers, policy makers, or the general

public as being used to make important decisions that immediately and directly impact upon

pupils’ educational experiences and futures (apud Watkins, 2007, 26). EADSE proposes that

initial assessment of pupils who are thought to have disabilities can have two possible

purposes:

1. Identification linked to an official decision to ‘recognise’ a pupil as having educational

needs that require additional resources to support their learning;

2. Informing learning programmes, where assessment is focused upon highlighting strengths

and weaknesses the pupil may have in different areas of their educational experience. Such

information is often used in a formative way – perhaps as the starting point for Individual

Education Plans (IEPs) or other target-setting approaches – rather than as a one off,

baseline assessment.

Nowadays assessment evidence is very much placed within the public domain for purposes

of comparisons and this, linked to the national level pressures for greater accountability in

education, leads to an increasing emphasis on pupil performance as a factor in directing

educational policy making. Educators are calling for new assessment practices to be used to

support pupil learning, guide educational improvement and enhance equity for all pupils, a

social inclusion as Lloyd proposes (2006).

4.3 Inclusive assessment practices in some European countries

Based in the work group of the IRIS project we collected narrative descriptions about school

and classroom implementation of assessment in different regions from different countries of

Europe (Portugal: Alentejo; Spain: Cataloñia; Belgium: Bussels; Austria: Graz; United

Kingdom: Tiverton) (see Candeias et al., 2009). The implementation of school and classroom

assessment in this group of countries could be described under three main topics, namely:

I. Concept and Process of Inclusive Assessment

All the countries point out the access to assessment services (provided by teachers from

special education, psychologists and other staff). The procedures to improve the assessment

process have specific characteristics’, in accordance with the legislation and the

Page 18: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

administrative rules of the countries but also the intention to make inclusive assessment

based on a team work approach is apparent in the narratives, as well as the conception of

the process of inclusive assessment.

II. Approach to assessment

In all the narratives we could identify that when a pupil presents specific needs teachers,

family or other professionals could alert the assessment team, from the preschool level. We

could conclude that in the countries involved in this work that there is a global network

between schools, within the community and families to identify and raise their concerns

about children’s’ specific needs. Once again, the type of procedures could have specific

characteristics’, in accordance with legislation, the administrative rules and the cultural

values of the countries, but the main idea of global network to alert and identify suggest an

inclusive approach to assessment in such countries.

III. Process, stages and strategies

We identify a variety of stages, methods and strategies which are used for identifying the

child as eligible for specific services, planning instruction, and measuring progress. That

presupposes that the initial assessment refers to procedures designed to locate those young

children and technical resources to a given assessment. Diagnosis and characterisation of

functionality is based on information obtained through observation, interviews, case history,

and informal and standardised tools. The examiner strives to determine the nature of the

child’s difficulties, the severity of the problem, and becomes the basis for determining

eligibility for special education services. The diagnosis assists in planning intervention too.

The diagnosis is conducted by members of a multidisciplinary team in all the countries

involved in the study. If the previous stage of assessment indicates there is a need for

intervention, the next stage involves assessment for the planning of programs and

interventions (IEP). IEP interventions consider the areas of difficulties and potential in

accordance with the educational and developmental objectives for the pupils’ level of

education and learning. In all the countries involved program monitoring (multiple checks

include multi methods and different kind of tools), and program evaluation with specific

criteria (in accordance with national policies of evaluation). The information collected in

Portugal, Spain, Austria, Belgium and United Kingdom is in accordance with the recent

proposals from the European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education – EADSE

- (Watkins, 2007). Inclusive Assessment, with all the national diversity in terms of resources,

administration rules, legislation and cultural values is an intention and a practice. As EADSE

Page 19: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

proposes assessment of pupils, who are thought to have disabilities, can have two possible

purposes:

1. Identification linked to an official decision to ‘recognise’ a pupil as having educational

needs that require additional resources to support their learning;

2. Informing learning programmes, where assessment is focused upon highlighting strengths

and weaknesses the pupil may have, in different areas of their educational experience. Such

information is often used in a formative way – perhaps as the starting point for Individual

Education Plans (IEP’s) or other target-setting approaches – rather than as a one off,

baseline assessment.

Nowadays educators are calling for new assessment practices to be used to support pupil

learning, guide educational improvement and enhance equity for all pupils, a social inclusion

as Lloyd proposes in 2006, and could argue that educators work on the improvement of such

new practices in 2009. However, because inclusive assessment implies collaborative work,

multidimensional assessment and an ecological approach to education based on family-

school-community, we need to continue to work in key areas for further development in the

use of inclusive assessment:

improved teacher training in conducting assessments;

linking alternative assessment to curricula and teaching programmes

linking assessment to Individual Education Plans,

improved teacher competences in team work.

This work about inclusive assessment in European countries (Austria, Belgium,

Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom) could be completed with the tables of

description of Technical Analysis of Tools used in such countries. We present these

tables with Technical Analysis of Tools used by Teachers (Validated/not validated) and

Technical Analysis of Tools used by Others Professionals (Validated/not validated), in

the CD-Rom and in the IRIS Project Website.

4.4 Individual educational plans

An IEP is a written plan developed for a pupil who has been identified as having a problem

(physical, sensory, intellectual, emotional, social, or any combination of these problems)

which affects the learning and which leads to the need for a special or modified curriculum or

specially adapted learning. This working document is the main tool for collaborative planning

between the school team, the parents and the pupil.

Page 20: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

In order to know, if a pupil needs an IEP, a multidisciplinary team of professionals evaluates

him based on their observations, the pupil’s performances on standardised tests and daily

work.

Afterwards, when the pupil has been identified as having special needs, another team should

be formed. The members of this team should be chosen on their ability to provide information

or support the pupil’s programme.

The participants usually include: a regular teacher, a specialised teacher, other professionals

(a psychologist, different therapists), parents and sometimes, the pupil.

Parents should be encouraged to be actively involved in decisions regarding educational

services for their children. They provide a unique perspective about the pupil’s personality,

development and learning. Open communication and cooperation between home and school

increases the opportunities for pupils with special needs to experience success.

When the IEP team is formed, a member of the team should be assigned as the coordinator,

in order to lead its development and implementation.

This important document should contain:

• essential information about the pupil, including relevant medical, social and educational

background information;

• degree of participation in the regular programme;

• the areas in which the pupil needs programme adaptations and/or modification goals:

• required classroom accommodations;

• adjustments in the evaluation processes;

• individual plan considering transition into active life;

• IEP evaluation (criteria, tools, timetable and review).

Usually the services and goals outlined in an IEP can be provided in a standard school

environment. They can be done in the regular classroom or in a special resource room in the

regular school. The resource room can serve a group of pupils with similar needs who are

brought together for help.

In four of the six partner countries all pupils have the right to get an individual education plan

(IEP). The exception is Austria and Belgium, where only pupils with disabilities or educational

difficulties can claim the right to get an IEP. This means that all pupils (with and without

disabilities or difficulties) have the same right in four of the countries.

4.5 Curriculum adaptations

Roldão (1999) considers the curriculum as a process of construction, management and

Page 21: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

reflexive training focused on school. The right of everyone, without exception, to a quality

education makes it necessary to reinvent the school so that it can offer and build a

differentiated and meaningful curriculum that allows the realisation of such an “Inclusive

School, School for All”.

According to Bertram, Fotheringham and Harley (2000), a curriculum could be understood in

the following two ways:

• first, … as a plan (which may be written as a document). This plan reflects the knowledge,

skills and attitudes that any society chooses to pass on their children.

• second, … as the learning and teaching experiences that happen in any site of education.

Therefore, a curriculum is a carefully planned and well written document which explicitly

reflects the knowledge, skills, values and attitudes of societies that are intended to be passed

to or mediated to the future generation, comprising both the old and the young.

As we believe that everybody has the right to attend school and develop different skills, we

have to pay the same attention to everybody. So, we need to adapt curricula according to the

special needs of all the pupils.

Curriculum adaptations are modifications related specifically to instruction or content of a

curriculum. They are not intended to lower the education standards. The curriculum is thus

adapted to make education accessible to everyone.

The scale and extent of curriculum adaptations and modifications will only be determined

after a thorough assessment of an individual pupil.

An individualised learning programme and work schedule with its related lesson plans should

be devised on the basis of the needs of visually impaired pupils. Adaptation at lesson plan

level will be required for all pupils in a class who need specific additional support because of

their disabilities. Those involved in this process must include the teachers, parents, school

team and relevant professionals.

There are different types of curriculum adaptations:

• Quantity: adapt the number of items or the number of activities;

• Time: individualise a timeline for completing a task;

• Level of support: increase the amount of personal assistance;

• Input: adapt the way instruction is delivered to the pupil;

• Difficulty: adapt the skill level, problem type or rules;

• Output: adapt the way the pupil can respond to instruction;

• Participation: adapt the extent to which a pupil is actively involved in the task;

Page 22: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

• Alternative goals: adapt the goals or outcome expectations while using the same materials;

• Functional curriculum: provide different instruction and materials to reach a pupil’s individual

goals; this is only for pupils with moderate to severe disabilities.

Certainly curriculum adaptations are not intended the education standards. Curriculum is

adapted to make education more accessible and to ensure that pupils with special needs do

not face prejudices or are treated unfairly. Learning problems, working schedules and lesson

plans can be modified and adapted to respond to the individual needs of pupils.

The scale and scope of curriculum adaptations and modifications will only be determined

after an assessment of one individual pupil. An individualised learning programme and work

schedule with its related lesson plans should be devised on the basis of the needs of the

visually impaired pupil. Adaptation at lesson level plan will be required for all pupils in a class

who need specific additional support because of their disabilities. Those involved in this

process must include teachers, parents, school-based and district-based support teams

(when they exist). Other relevant professionals from the community can be consulted too.

Page 23: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

5. NEW CONCEPTS ON TEACHER TRAINING - CLASSROOM CLIMATE, TEAM WORK,

INCLUSIVE ASSESSMENT

5.1 Introduction, defining the concept of classroom climate

Classroom climate concerns the affective-relational area; it observes, for example, feeling of

meaning, respect, participation, well being, self-confidence, perceptions formed in the

interaction between pupils and school. The concept of classroom climate with impact on

learning processes in social interactions has been defined as;

the group of psychological and social characteristics of a classroom, determined by structural,

personal and functional factors (…) The classroom climate has to do with characteristics and

behaviour of the teachers, of the pupils, the interaction among these and, in consequence, the

class dynamic is unique and particular to these elements (Rodriguez,. 2004:1).

The climate of the classroom is also described as a system comprising of four sets of

variables: the physical involvement, the organisational objectives, characteristics of teachers

and pupils (Schmidt & Ĉagran, 2006). It is seen as a strong mediator of values, beliefs and

standards (ibid, 2006) also called the discourse. With discourse is meant a normative

context, coherent systems of meaning in which meaning is created, enclosed, and excluded.

5.2 Factors of Influence and Consequences on Climate of Classroom

Research shows that pupils need to feel that school is for them; most pupils are

dependent on teachers who can offer them this opportunity (Hugo, 2009; Ljusberg, 2009).

The real possibility of access to participation in the classroom is one of the most important

indicators of classroom climate. Pupils achieve much better in classrooms with an academic

environment where they feel happy (Westling Allodi, 2002). The voluntary participation in the

classroom is much related to the climate of it (Okolo, 2007). Most important in the climate in

school are affective-relational factors with impact on learning processes in social interactions.

This social dimension is also most evident in the context of the classroom where

pupils/situations/teachers in need of extra support are particularly vulnerable and in need of

an environment which is respectful of the differences. The work on expectations, attitudes

and beliefs is particularly important for the impact each has, not only for academic learning,

but across the socio-emotional dynamics in the classroom. Teachers’ attitudes are an

important factor in determining the success of pupils (Grosin, 2004; Groth, 2007; Hugo,

2007; Lundgren, 2007), and it is similar when it comes to inclusion (Ainscow, 1993; Baker &

Page 24: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Gottlieb, 1980; Monsen & Frederickson, 2004; Scruggs & Mastropieri, 1996; Ward, Center &

Bochner, 1994). Interpersonal relationships are modified by the interactions between pupils

and between teacher and pupils in a context, the school/classroom, and in a national and

local discourse. These interactions are crucial, not only by their number, but essentially their

quality, that is also closely related to the multiple dimensional development of each person.

The individual development (pupil or teacher), which impacts on these interactions are in turn

influenced by many factors, including their self-satisfaction, self-image, process of learning

and social competence, among others (Chang, 2003; Wentzel, 2002). Several studies show

that although peer groups are important influences, the teacher has a vital role in changing

attitudes. Even if language and attitudes are important research shows that infra-verbal

signals underlying the dynamic in emotional climate is ever important. The discourse;

beliefs, expectations and attitudes of teachers and other adults in school, particularly in view

of the difference, have profound effects in various socio-emotional dimensions, including

level of self-concept, the process of acceptance and rejection among peers and the social

adjustment among the pupils (Chang, 2003; Wentzel, 2002). In the classes where the

teachers have a positive attitude to inclusion the pupils also expressed a higher degree of

satisfaction, and a distinctively lower level of disagreement or quarrelling (Monsen &

Frederickson, 2004).

Many pupils in need of special support have significant social problems, such as

establishing friendships and feelings of isolation or loneliness. Research shows that

problems with establishing friendship can be found in the context (Ljusberg, 2009). Since the

relationship between peers in childhood has a key role in structuring and subsequent social

adjustment throughout life, it is for an inclusive school teacher to create environments that

support and lead the promotion of acceptance and social competence. Some authors are

even considering this as fundamental in establishing an inclusive setting (Meadan, 2008;

Patton, & Gall, 2006). Similarly the relationship between peers, in that it promotes self-

knowledge and understanding of each other in a horizontal relationship with significant

others, is also a reflection of the skills brought into play by each individual, in the inclusive

classroom. Self -esteem and social rejection by peers are also well known not only as a

consequence but as determinants of relationships, social adjustment and the academic

success (Santos, 2007).

Inclusion is not always seen positively in the classroom climate. Some studies (Katz &

Mirenda, 2002; Trump & Hang, 1996) indicate that inclusion has positive effects but also

negative and insignificant effects for the climate of the classroom. To contribute to the

positive effects the teacher must prepare well for inclusion have clear expectations, accept

Page 25: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

the special education teacher as an equal partner, acknowledge the heterogeneity of

classes, be tolerant and use more diverse strategies. The negative effects arise in cases of

overloaded classes or when pupils in need of special support are not accepted.

Studies show that it is easier to change the classroom climate if people other than

teachers are involved (Schmidt & Ĉagran, 2006). Villa, Thousand, Myers, & Nevin (1996)

claim that head-teachers’ support and staff collaboration are apparent as important factors in

the formation of positive attitudes although teachers perceive head-teachers as being

detached and ambivalent towards inclusion. Van Reusen, Shoho & Barker (2001) expand the

involvement to concern all staff around the pupils. Other researchers go further and mean

that the whole education system, as a single body, contributes to the learning process and if

a sector does not work or is weakened, the whole process may be affected (Sakarneh,

2004). Van Reusen et. al (2001) hypothesise that “the attitudes and beliefs that teachers,

administrators and other school personnel hold towards inclusion and the learning ability of

pupils with disabilities may influence school learning environments and the availability of

equal educational opportunities for all pupils” (ibid, p. 8). To change from a mainstream

school to an inclusive school is about changing discourse; values, norms and attitudes

(Carrington & Robinson, 2004; Fullan, 1999; Hunt & Goetz, 1997; Riehl’s, 2000; West-

Burnham, 1997). Inclusion requires a deep acceptance of all individuals with variety in their

ethnicity, religion, language, gender, class, in their diversity of needs, opportunities and

difficulties. In this perspective it is indispensable to add the pupil’s own experience of

participation, as well during classroom time and during breaks – being able to take part in

and have access to the information that flows in and outside of the classroom (Ljusberg,

2009).

5.3 Climate, and language

The way we act, including the language we use, we are never free from values; in fact the

discourse is steering what we recognise and how we respond. For example; when it comes

to difficulties in the classroom, in the encounter between the pupil and the school, different

perspectives for example a compensatory perspective, or a critical, or a socio-cultural one

give different meaning to the situation, which adequately gives different solutions. From a

compensatory perspective the difficulties are attached to the pupil, from a critical perspective

in the organisation and from a socio-cultural perspective the difficulties are seen as social

constructs in a classroom situation. Nilholm (2006) states that the compensatory perspective

regards special needs:

Page 26: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

… as an individual quality; such needs are demarcated and categorised. ... Special,

rather than inclusive support is advocated; what is seen as special education expertise

is supplied immediately, related to the diagnosed problems in the pupil. The reason for

the special education support is seen to depend on impairments that are either

congenital or in some other way attached to the individual (Nilholm, 2006, p. 17, our

translation).

In this perspective, the behaviour, including the language of teachers, has a strong role,

modelling the relationships within the group. It concerns the teachers’ self-reflection upon

their norms and different perspectives on normality, diversity, identity and responsibility. Dror

(2006) points to the involvement of 6 factors in the general climate of school (not specifically

in the classroom), including: supportive leadership; teachers’ autonomy; prestige of the

teaching profession; renovations, teachers collaboration and workload. Teachers who

perceive their schools as having a supportive leadership encourage the innovation/updates

and collaboration between partners, leading to more positive attitudes towards inclusion. This

is important though human beings (re)construct meaning in interplay with other persons in

different social practices (Vygotsky, 1999). There is evidence to suggest (e.g. Sebba &

Ainscow, 1996) that an inclusive school is a school that has been subject to change and

improvement. There are strong facts showing that the school culture has to change. An issue

that should be considered regarding culture and inclusive culture is the fact that mainstream

and special education teachers often fail to collaborate (Henderson, 1994). This problem is

regarded by Bush (1995) as a co-existence of divergent cultures in organisations. Riel’s

(2000) view of the change in the mind-set is that ‘the development of inclusive structures and

practices must be accompanied by new understandings and values or they will not result in

lasting change’. Fullan (1999) has identified organisational culture as a key factor in leading

change because of the need to develop new values, norms and attitudes when change is

implemented. When teachers educate they use a special theoretical framework often hidden,

not reflected upon, but still there – working - here called an interpretive background

(Hundeide, 2006). When educating, words are used, word which are created in the

encounter between their interpretive backgrounds and a special discourse in the classroom.

Words are action, the language is a powerful steering tool and works in at least to ways; it is

created and it creates. To understand something is creative. Hjörne (2004) identified this

phenomenon in relation to the diagnosis AD/HD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder)

stating that in a study she conducted on a pupil welfare team once the AD/HD diagnosis has

been introduced and adopted as relevant, it seemed to be included in the staff pre-

Page 27: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

understanding and became active in the creation of meaning. How teachers give meaning to

– understand - a situation in school is dependent on their interpretive background and on the

discursive practice. How we look upon the world, situations and actions/interactions are then

coloured or shaped. Learning can be seen as participation in different discourses through

communication/interaction and the interaction is seen as a part of teaching and developing

(Vygotsky 1999; Säljö 1999, 2000; Hundeide 2006). A key point is that discourses are built

into artefacts and even the language is seen as an artefact. ‘We are learning … to notice,

describe and act in reality in the way the surroundings permit and encourage’ (Säljö 2000,

66, our translation). In the literature there are various indications of the influence exerted by

teachers’ interpretive backgrounds and expectations. In a classroom study Davis, Watson

and Cunningham-Burley (2000) studied the interaction between pupils with intellectual

disabilities and between pupils and teachers. The staff associated with the studied group of

pupils gave various conditions of development to the pupils, depending on what meaning

they saw in the pupils’ behaviour. The staff’s perspective could also be linked to the staff's

own cultural background.

How teachers look upon the pupil are active ingredients in pupils’ availability to be a

particular kind of pupil. In the case of teachers’ interpretive backgrounds, they are crucial to

their approach, which makes up the framework within which the pupils have freedom to act.

Hellström (2004), for example, uses the term ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’, while Jenner (2004)

talks about the ‘Pygmalion effect’. The creation and maintenance of this environmental and

socio-emotional climate in which all pupils can feel that they and their classmates are

psychologically safe, valued and accepted, ensure active involvement and sense of

belonging is therefore a sine qua non condition for the successful development of any

inclusive practice.

5.4 Classroom climate - impact on different levels

In an overview of 19 research investigations of inclusive programs, practices and outcomes,

Hunt & Goetz (1997) describe the characteristics of these programs such as a “morally

driven commitment to children” and “a consensus on a set of values” that can be understood

as components of school culture. According to Ballard (1996) the main shift in the mind-set

towards inclusive culture is the ‘recognition of the value of diversity in schools and

communities’ (ibid. p. 42). Zollers, Ramanathan, & Moonset (1999) conducted research that

explored the relationship between culture and inclusion. The research was a single-case

study and it identified three elements of culture that contribute to inclusive culture:

1) a democratic and empowering culture with collaborative decision-making,

Page 28: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

2) a broad vision of school community with parental involvement,

3) and shared language and values (Zollers et al. !999).

A survey from various studies, found that classroom climate is often referred to as having

an impact, positive or negative, on several levels, including;

The regulation of movement and construction of knowledge i.e. an inclusive

environment facilitate the explanation from various perspectives that enrich the

discussion.

The impact of meta-curriculum e.g. one class allows inclusive and productive learning

between different groups of pupils, facilitating their development of expertise, while a

non inclusive learning context facilitates the perpetuation of stereotypes.

The emotional impact on learning i.e. a class where the learning experience is

characterised by positive emotions - excitement of discovery, joy, etc. - has increased

productivity by motivating pupils for future learning; contrary emotions such as fear,

boredom and other negative emotions are highly unmotivated consequences for pupil

and his academic success.

The dynamics of power in the classroom i.e. in productive classes teachers use their

authority to encourage all pupils in their own way of learning, and sometimes the

refusal to learn can be an ultimate form of resistance from those who feel helpless in

a hostile environment

The persistence of the pupil - pupils remain engaged when they feel included and not

made to feel less capable than others.

The self-esteem of both pupil and teacher has a direct impact on the classroom climate..

For a teacher, self-esteem is one of the must important variables in their perception of

self-efficacy. This is evident where there is a focus on collaborative work between

teachers and special education teachers. Studies by Lovey (2002) reported that special

education teachers often feel superfluous and even some sense of suspicion for their

presence in the classroom where there is a need for extra support. The way this

presence is received by the teacher, as well as the collaborative work that is developed

or not developed, has been reported in several cross-cultural studies as a determinant

factor in climate (Bartolo, Janik,, Janikova, & Hofsass, 2007).

5.5 Creating and Maintaining an Inclusive Climate on Classroom

Research shows that Inclusive Education is achieved in a classroom with particular

strategies and practices differing from those traditionally used (Westwood, 2004). According

to a report by the European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2003)

Page 29: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

practice of inclusive education should be based, essentially, on a quality education that

promotes a truly inclusive educational differentiation, achieved through the use of

cooperative work, action in partnership, promotion of working groups gathered in the

classroom and the promotion of work with peers.

Several studies show an educational potential for interactions between peers, on the

development of social-cognitive skills at the level of the affective-emotional development for

both partners (Bond & Castagna, 2006; Terpstra & Tamura, 2008).

When developing strategies, interventions are more focused on a relational context

than on the individual to enable the emergence of a sense of belonging, facilitating

collaboration and friendship.

The development of a classroom climate which feels really secure, generates self-

confidence and acceptance is crucial for the growth of children and adolescents and the

success of any educational practice that is targeted. So it seems essential to organise some

guidance to contribute to the development of strategies for creating and maintaining an

inclusive classroom climate.

The recognition of this important relational dimension in many studies has stressed

the need for a conscious development of strategies that ensure respect for difference,

leaving not only the development of appropriate physical environments, but in order to create

a genuine and successful development of skills in all children. This goal, which involves long

and consistent work is based on a reflective process for the improvement on the part of

teachers regarding their attitudes towards the profound individual differences.

These positive attitudes and beliefs of teachers and pupils to inclusion are some of

the most important factors on the creation of classroom climate (Monsen & Frederickson,

2004).

Among the pedagogical strategies that may contribute to the development of a

inclusive classroom climate when it comes to teacher-pupil interaction, are: the use of an

inclusive language with the frequent use of male, female and first names; the avoidance of

generalisations; the avoidance of value judgements and prejudices with teachers using self-

reflection about their intervention; giving feedback focusing on controllable causes such as

effort; the avoidance of embarrassing exposure of pupils to others; being alert to body

language of the pupils; being as objective as possible in conversations; serving as a role

model interacting with everyone and respecting all opinions.

5.6 Some ideas about teacher training

The practice of these guidelines requires a deep involvement by the teacher, reflecting not

Page 30: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

only on their professional skills but - as a professional who deals with the person - also

reflecting on their own personal and social skills. This means that training teachers for an

inclusive school probably cannot restrict us to a traditional academic education but must

propose a training model that involves new processes.

The teacher training (initial and continuing) is a key resource for the construction and

affirmation of the inclusive school, promoting the development of attitudes, knowledge and

personal skills and teaching to serve the interests and the aims of Inclusive education.

Based on these considerations, we believe that the most important dimensions

(assuming a cross dimensions character) in the development of any program of teacher

education for Inclusive Schools are the knowledge, analysis and reflection about the

importance of creating and maintaining an inclusive climate in the classroom and their

conditioning factors and strategies considered most effective for its implementation. It seems

essential for the strategies to be put into practice as part of an experiential process, reflected

upon, and then for the teacher to respond to how he/she experiences difference and what

impact it has on him/her.

Reviewing the research on classroom climate and classroom climate in inclusive

settings offers the following suggestions about how to create and maintain a positive climate.

Classroom climate is seen as a strong mediator of values, norms beliefs and standards and

these are reflected in both how the classroom and teaching is physically and psychologically

organised and how the pupils are approached. Basically it is about widening the thinking

about normality not just focusing on similarities but respecting and appreciating difference as

a variation of pupils´ ethnicity, religion, language, gender, class, needs, opportunities and

difficulties. These positive attitudes and beliefs of teachers and pupils to inclusion are some

of the most determinant factors on creation of a positive classroom climate

We can develop a school that can meet the diversity of pupils as a reality. Pupils have

different backgrounds in terms of class, ethnicity, gender, and disability, and thus different

ways of interacting and giving meaning. It is important to develop a school that is based on

diversity and that focuses on a situated learning. To support this change we have constructed

this material and the Aide Memoir. Most of the different headings in the Aide Memoir play a

vital role in establishing a positive classroom climate. If we have to select a few we choose

these: Welcome; Communication; Level of work and Motivation; Value and Respect; Positive

experience; Friendships; Ambience; Rules and routines and Safety / security.

5.7 Teamwork in Inclusive Classrooms

Page 31: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Teamwork is essential for the development of interaction in an inclusive classroom. The

results have been positive when the work in the classroom is based on teamwork.

Developing fundamental communication competences, developing cognitive capacities,

developing emotional well-being and promoting a constructive interaction are some of the

elements which can favour teamwork. Studies have shown that progress has been made at

the levels of sociability and communication as a result of the dynamics of teamwork.

A team is a group of people who work together to accomplish a common goal. The concept

of teamwork is defined as “the work done by a group of pupils which has a shared

awareness of identity and rules, the same aims and commitment to help the others” (Arnaiz,

1988)

Teamwork is a challenge both for pupils and for teachers who work with the same class-

group or work in the same inclusive school.

There are some advantages of teamwork in inclusive classrooms, it:

Provides a valuable opportunity to achieve high quality learning outcomes;

Stimulates collaboration and develops pupils’ confidence and active participation in

learning;

Brings together pupils with different experiences and perspectives, so it leads to

creative and innovative solutions;

Encourages pupils to challenge assumptions;

Gives pupils a chance to perform a number of different roles;

Develops different skills such as: project management, problem solving, conflict

resolution and negotiation;

Prepares pupils for the workplace.

Sometimes some problems might be found:

Some pupils prefer to work and be assessed independently,

Not all the pupils learn everything about the topic,

Some pupils tend to dominate others in the team.

The most important thing is to be aware and attentive to all pupils and give them equal

opportunities for success. Teachers can convert possible problems into challenges for

inclusion.

Page 32: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Therefore the qualities of a team must include the following items in order to contribute to an

inclusive environment, that:

Team members share their goals

Team members understand their roles and scopes for contribution

Team members work together and independently to complete tasks

Team members give each other emotional support

Teachers must learn some basic competences to develop teamwork in their classes:

Planning for each stage of group work. Thinking about how they will introduce and

organise pupils in teamwork.

Explaining to their classes how the groups will operate and how pupils will be graded.

Explaining the objectives of the group task and defining any relevant concepts and

tasks.

Giving pupils the skills they need to succeed in groups. (skills like active and tolerant

listening, helping one another in mastering content, giving and receiving constructive

criticism, managing disagreements and so on).

Evaluating the effectiveness of teamwork. Evaluating goals and objectives, trust and

conflict, expression of differences, leadership, control and procedures, utilisation of

resources, interpersonal communication, problem solving /decision making)

The construction of these competences implies that the teachers must be well-grounded

in some aspects like:

Decide how the groups will be formed

Some teachers prefer randomly assigning pupils to groups to maximise their

heterogeneity: a mix of males and females, verbal and quiet pupils, the

pessimistic and the optimistic.

Page 33: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Some teachers let pupils choose with whom they want to work, although this

runs the risk that groups will socialise too much and that pupils will self-

segregate.

Still other teachers prefer to form the groups themselves, taking into account

pupils' prior achievement, levels of preparation, work habits, ethnicity, and

gender. They try to sprinkle the more able pupils evenly among the groups

A middle ground, is to ask pupils to express a preference.

Learning teams work best when they are balanced in terms of their abilities and have

members with varied characteristics. Ideally, group members have:

various levels of prior achievement

various levels of prior experience

a gender mix

an ethnic and linguistic mix

various learning styles

Be conscious of group size. In general, teams of four or five pupils work best. Larger

groups decrease each member's opportunity to participate actively.

Keep teams together. When a team is not working well, avoid breaking it up, even if

the group requests it. It’s important to learn solving problems together.

Help groups plan how to proceed. Ask each group to devise a plan of action: who will

be doing what and when. Review the groups' written plans or meet with each group to

discuss its plan.

Regularly check in with the teams. Teachers can establish checkpoints with the team.

Provide mechanisms for groups to deal with problems (uncooperative members,

conflicts among members etc.)

There are many types of teams composed through complexity criteria that teachers and

educators should differentiate in order to promote inclusion in their classroom:

Page 34: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Formal learning teams are teams established to complete a specific task, such as

perform an experiment, write a report, carry out a project and so on. These groups

may complete their work in a single class session or over several sessions. Typically,

pupils work together until the task is finished, and their project is graded.

Informal learning teams are ad hoc temporary groups of pupils within a single class

session. Informal learning groups can be initiated, for example, by asking pupils to

turn to a neighbour and spend two minutes discussing a question you have posed.

You can also form groups of three to five to solve a problem or other class task.

Long-term teams (usually existing over a long period of the course) with stable

membership whose primary responsibility is to provide members with support,

encouragement, and assistance in completing course requirements and assignments.

In most European countries the aim of compulsory education is that of providing pupils

with quality education that enables them to acquire basic cultural skills as well as

fostering their own personal development (social skills, study and work habits, creativity

and affectivity…) Some examples of teamwork in inclusive schools are the following:

Group dynamics

Some schools use group dynamics to increase good relationships among pupils and the

best contribution of every pupil to the work group. Group dynamic activities develop some

skills referring to communication, confidence among group members, decision-making,

problem solving, conflict resolution and cohesiveness. Also group dynamic activities

encourage collaboration and creativity.

Effective group dynamics require respect for one another, clearly articulated shared

goals, frequent interaction, equitably divided tasks, and shared responsibility for mistakes

and successes and free expression of opinions and perspectives.

Collaborative learning

Collaborative learning is an educational approach to teaching and learning that involves

groups of pupils working together to solve a problem, complete a task, or create a

product. In the school, groups provide support, an academic framework to learn, a

conduit for encouragement, and in many ways, a buffer that can prevent academic

Page 35: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

failure. In a group setting, the pupil has the opportunity to rehearse his understanding

with others and to be exposed to other conceptual constructs.

Peer mentoring

Peer mentors are trained to work with other pupils in school to develop positive

relationships and help special needs pupils or immigrant pupils with their worries,

problems and difficulties.

Peer mediation

A pair of pupils helps others to solve a conflict. Peer mediation is a service that the pupils,

themselves, can use to manage conflicts that they are having with other pupils. It gives

the pupils an opportunity to be more independent and solve conflicts in a mature

responsible manner.

Teamwork among professionals is another challenge for inclusive schools. Educators are

being asked to collaborate with each other, with administrators and district officials, with

pupils, with parents, and with community members. Teamwork is a form of collective work

where educators and school professionals come together to share ideas, strategies, even

possible solutions. Each member has their own individual task, but these separate tasks can

benefit from hearing what colleagues are doing or have done with similar tasks.

Some special skills are required for teamwork like skills for planning work, communication,

responsibility, supportive diversity and feedback and evaluation. Therefore working in a team

is a question of skills but it also presupposes the conviction that cooperation is a positive

professional value. These two aspects (skills and the conviction of the value of teamwork)

are more closely related than is thought: what people haven’t mastered is normally

undervalued.

Training needs detected in the area of development of teamwork tend to be related to similar

aspects of teamwork among pupils, its organisation, or basic skills necessary for carrying it

out.

5.8 New concepts on teacher training: Inclusive Assessment

Assessment of pupils in inclusive settings should be, progressively, a responsibility shared

Page 36: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

jointly by practitioners of different research communities and useful collaborative work could

be undertaken to develop diagnostic assessment tools for use in formative assessment. But,

some times, as Goodrum, Hackling and Rennie (2001) found, diagnostic evidence is rarely

employed for informing teachers how to plan learning.

That assumption presupposes the synchronisation between assessment policy and

assessment practices with a continuum that includes: instruction in class, school, and home.

Setting decisions must be made by an IEP team that includes parents, teachers,

psychologists, and other persons knowledgeable about the pupil (Candeias et al., 2008;

Salvia, Ysseldyke & Bolt, 2007). So, as these authors propose inclusive assessment

information should be used «to make decisions about the extent to which educational

programs in school systems are working for all pupils, including pupils with disabilities»

(2007, p. 17).

In this context, improving inclusive assessment as practice in schools it will be necessary to

change assessment practices as well as the role of parents and teachers within assessment,

as we explain in the next points.

Kleinert et al. (2002) suggests a set of key questions that remains in relation to inclusive

assessment:

How do teachers meet the responsibilities of assessing pupils with specific needs

in programmes aligned with 'standards' and the assessment requirements of

official legislation?

How do teachers ensure that all pupils with disabilities achieve in the general

education curriculum to the best extent possible?

How do teachers decide which pupils need alternative assessments?

How do teachers design effective alternative assessments?

Earl and LeMahieu (1997) had already called for more emphasis upon the concept of

assessment for learning if the desired educational reforms and improvements are to be

realised. Assessment as (or for) learning allows teachers to use their judgment about a

pupil’s understanding to inform the teaching process and to determine what to do for

individual pupils. These aims and purposes of assessment are exactly what can be identified

as being best practice assessment within primary inclusive settings. Stanford and Reeves

(2005) also state that a fundamental truth in effective teaching is that assessment strategies

must help the teacher determine the most appropriate instruction, in addition to assessing

progress.

Page 37: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Pugach and Warger (2001) suggest attention should be focused on the performance and

progress of all learners and that assessment linked to programmes of instruction can

enhance teaching as, this way, teachers are better informed about the learning progress and

difficulties of their pupils and, therefore, they can make better decisions about what a pupil

needs to learn next and how to teach that material in a manner that will maximise pupils’

learning.

Nowadays teachers and other educational professionals are calling for new assessment

practices to be used to support pupil learning, guide educational improvement and enhance

equity for all pupils, a social inclusion as Lloyd proposes in 2006. As we stated before

(Candeias et al., 2009), inclusive assessment implies collaborative work, multidimensional

assessment and an ecological approach to education based on family-school-community. For

this we need to improve teacher training in conducting assessments, linking alternative

assessment to curricula and teaching programmes and linking assessment to Individual

Education Plans.

Page 38: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

6. TEACHING INCLUSIVELY

The Aide Memoir: - a new proposal to support and assess teachers’ inclusive

classroom practice.

6.1. Introduction

The drive towards inclusive teaching has been underpinned by legislation and policies in

many of the European partner’s countries. The research, carried out in recognised inclusive

schools by the teams in the project, showed that the countries were at different stages of

developing this concept. Through interviews with teachers it became apparent that teachers

and assistants would welcome a tool to support their practice in the classroom. For some it

would be a new way of working, for others a reminder of useful ideas and strategies – an

Aide Memoir.

6.2 Teaching inclusively is about creating an ethos and environment where pupils can

enjoy learning, reflect, improve and grow in confidence. This is fundamental to all learning,

yet it is not without its challenges. Each child is unique: teaching requires a holistic approach

and is not just about addressing the academic needs in school (Brodin and Lindstrand 2007).

Knowledge of child development is essential, as is an understanding of what makes the child

an individual. It is a very complex brief. Effective inclusive practice requires the teacher to

have good relationships with pupils and adults, a breadth of knowledge and understanding to

actively support and extend the pupil’s learning, an appropriate learning environment and

high quality teaching, including the ability to meet all pupils needs, learning styles and

interests (DFES 2005, Ljusberg 2009).

6.3 The Aide Memoir and the “Fit to learn bookmark” are intended to help teachers:

o To evaluate the level of their inclusive practice regarding suitable conditions for

learning, the learning community, the learning environment and positive instruction

o To increase the level of their inclusive practice in those areas

o To raise awareness that good practice can meet the needs of ALL pupils, despite their

individual needs

o To identify their individual needs for in - service training.

o To use as a checklist for assessing the quality of inclusion or assessment.

The Aide Memoir is organised into five main sections, namely:

Page 39: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

1. Am I including? – looking at inclusion from a wide perspective, including everyone in the

classroom.

2. The Environment - Is my classroom inclusive? – using resources, including technology

and the ambience of the classroom.

3. A Collaborative approach – Have I involved? – building relationships with and between

pupils, staff, parents, other professionals and the community.

4. How can I adjust my teaching? - meeting all the needs of each individual using a variety

of strategies.

5. Fit to Learn? - using positive assessment to facilitate learning

The tool is in two parts – a bookmark and a booklet which can be downloaded from the

website. www.irisproject.eu Both the bookmark and the booklet have the same sections. In

each section there is a number of headings relating to the same theme. The bookmark is a

practical tool designed to be readily accessible, possibly in the diary, and used as a prompt in

the classroom. The booklet goes into greater depth. In this, under each heading there is a

series of questions designed to be stimulating to help in reflection or in the resolution of an

event that has occurred.

6.4 Evaluation of the tool

The Aide memoir was successfully trialled in a variety of schools in the partner countries.

While the main comment received was that the document was too long, the teachers could

not conclude which aspects could be omitted. It needed to be a large document in order to

be fully comprehensive. With more regular use they became more familiar with the Aide

Memoir which made it easier to use. Their initial understanding, and a weakness in the

introduction to the tools, was that the document had to be used in its entirety, answering all

the questions, which was too much to expect of busy practitioners. The questions were

designed to be thought provoking rather than as a yes/no exercise. However, using the stand

alone sections as and when required meant teachers could reflect on their daily practice,

revising their teaching methods accordingly.

A critical appraisal of the document said that the wording of certain sections needed greater

clarity which has been addressed. Similarly a comments box has been added for teachers to

make their own suggestions for future work.

The overall aim of the document is to aid teacher reflection, stimulate thinking, help to focus

on aspects of practice, and importantly to promote inclusive practice. Thinking in this way can

Page 40: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

then help with the whole school approach to inclusion, through its appraisal system,

understanding teachers’ needs for training and support and improving the current response

to inclusion within the school.

6.5 Practical use and case studies

Ideally the Aide Memoir should be read through to become familiarised with the contents

before its use. The sections are designed to be used as stand alone units that can be used

singly or together with others. It can also be used as a complete document. Therefore there

will be repetitions in ideas, though not always identical statements, in different sections. The

questions are to prompt thoughtful reflections for individual personal development, with a

space for comments if required.

Essentially it is a tool to be used as a reminder while teaching or working with the

whole class or with an individual pupil.

For an individual, the IRIS Aide Memoir bookmark can be used as a prompt when

situations arise.

For example:

A pupil, unexpectedly, completes a different piece of work from the rest of the class.

Use the bookmark to think positively how the situation could have been avoided.

Any of the following sections could be a starting point.

In Am I Including? Communication,

Barriers to Learning and

Participation

Or How Can I adjust my Teaching? Clarity of Approach,

Clear Expectations,

Clear Explanations,

Barriers to Learning

Page 41: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

By using these headings from the bookmark sufficient ideas may be generated to resolve the

problem. As a follow up, the questions in each of the sections, of the Aide Memoir, may

stimulate further thinking and create alternative solutions.

The IRIS Aide Memoir can be used as ideas for peer mentoring / staff discussions.

For example the main headings of inclusion, collaboration, environment and teaching

strategies, may be used for a general discussion or individual titles such as

communication to be more focussed.

The full Aide Memoir document, or specific sections, can be used as a personal

checklist for appraisal.

By collating the results of appraisals, using the Aide Memoir, it can be a window on

the whole school approach to inclusion, identifying the positive and negative aspects

of practice and seeing where training would be valuable for a whole school or at an

individual level.

Section five of the Aide Memoir addresses the individual needs of the pupil by looking at

assessment. The teacher can choose whether to look at a specific area of learning for the

pupil or to have a more global assessment, beginning in the classroom or requesting support

from outside professionals, for example, an educational psychologist, speech therapist,

hearing/sight advisor. It is important to work from known information from parents and from

direct observation, hence the sections on ‘what needs are known?’ and ‘observations’. All

assessments focus on the understanding of the pupil to facilitate his/her learning. In the

booklet there is a series of questions to support the teacher to address the pupil’s needs.

There follows two case studies to show how the Aide Memoir could be used in these

situations.

Page 42: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Case Study 1 – Olivia , Year 2

Presenting Difficulties

In the classroom Olivia was sullen and often passively uncooperative

On occasions she would lie under the table.

In the playground she would often lash out with her fists and feet.

Teacher thoughts/response

Very little I do makes any difference. I’m at my wits end. She never seems to join in or enjoy

being in school. I worry about the other children getting hurt too.

Intervention using the headings of the Aide Memoir

Parental Involvement

Olivia’s Mum was encouraged to talk to her daughter at a level which she could

understand, and provide some reassurance that she was not going to leave too.

Level of Work and Motivation (especially emotional well being)

Many efforts were made in school to give positive messages to Olivia about herself.

She actually became more tearful for a while, but her very angry behaviour

diminished considerably.

Further investigation and ‘Fit to Learn’ assessment following Parental Involvement

Sensitive discussions with Olivia’s mother uncovered the fact that her father had left the

family a year earlier and, although Olivia had been quite close to him, no one had talked to

her about what was happening for fear of upsetting her. In an interview with the educational

psychologist Olivia admitted that she cried every night but didn’t want her Mum to hear

because her Mum had been crying too. I must be a very bad person, very bad for my Daddy

not to want me any more.

Page 43: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Case Study 2 – Benjamin , Year 1

Presenting difficulties

During physical education, Benjamin would run from group to group at apparatus time

apparently ignoring instructions from the class teacher. He would make little attempt

to dress himself afterwards.

During class instruction and carpet times he would begin to ramble on about

irrelevant issues. Chatting about familiar topics was no problem.

He often became distressed.

Teacher’s thoughts/response

He’s attention seeking and manipulative.

Intervention using the headings of the Aide Memoir

Communication

Teacher gave simple instructions and Benjamin was expected to complete only one

thing at a time. He managed this successfully.

The teacher modified the content and duration of carpet time sessions. This was also

of benefit to other pupils.

Participation and Sharing

One or two other pupils in the class were encouraged to befriend Benjamin and help

him with dressing after Physical Education.

Parental Involvement

Following discussion with his mother, Benjamin was provided with clothes which were

easier to get on and off.

Benjamin’s confidence grew as a result of greater understanding by all concerned.

Further investigation using ‘Fit to Learn’ assessment following parental involvement

Page 44: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Benjamin was found to have a receptive language difficulty and a delay in the acquisition of

fine motor skills.

In summary the Aide memoir headings on the bookmark can be used as prompts for ideas.

The questions in the booklet can stimulate thinking particularly when reflecting on the day’s

work, if the day has gone well, if the results are not as expected in a classroom situation or

when a problem arises. Individual sections can be used for personal development and as a

whole school approach to inclusion, through appraisal, mentoring and staff discussion.

The IRIS Aide Memoir helps to support inclusive practice in a variety of ways for the

individual or as a whole school approach. It is a tool to encourage good practice and to give

helpful and practical advice.

Page 45: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

7. GLOSSARY

Assessment - refers to the ways teachers and other people involved in a pupil’s education

systematically collect and then use information about that pupil’s level of achievement and/or

development in different areas of their educational experience (academic, behaviour and

social) (Watkins, 2007).

Collaboration: Collaboration is an interactive process where a number of people with

particular expertise come together as equals to generate an appropriate programme or

process or find solutions to problems.

EADSNE - European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

IEP - Individual Education Plans

An Individual Education Plan (IEP) is a written document prepared for a named pupil which

specifies the learning goals that are to be achieved by the pupil over a set period of time and

the teaching strategies, resources and supports necessary to achieve those goals.

Inclusion: The value system which holds that all pupils are entitled to equal access to

learning, achievement and the pursuit of excellence in all aspects of their education. The

practice of inclusion transcends the idea of physical location and incorporates basic values

that promote participation, friendship and interaction.

Inclusion (Ainscow et al, 2006, p.15):

1. Inclusion concern with disable students and others categorized as “having special educational needs”.

2. Inclusion as a response to disciplinary exclusion.

3. Inclusion in relation to all groups seen as being vulnerable to exclusion.

4. Inclusion as developing the school for all.

5. Inclusion as Education for all.

6. Inclusion as a principled approach to education and society.

Special Educational Needs (SEN): means in relation to a person, “a restriction in the

capacity of the person to participate in and benefit from education on account of an enduring

Page 46: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

physical, sensory, mental health, or learning disability, or any other condition which results in

a person learning differently from a person without that condition”.

Page 47: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

8. REFERENCES

References - ” Conceptions of Inclusive Education in some European Countries” Ainscow, M., Booth, T. & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. London

and New York: Routledge.

Burstein, N., Sears, S., Wilcoxen, A., Cabello, B. & Spagna, M. (2004) Moving Toward

Inclusive Practices. Remedial and Special Education 25; 104 – 116

Candeias, A., Grácio, L. Borralho, A., Pomar, C.,. Chaleta, E. ,Pires,H., Dias, C. & Rodrigues,

J. (2008). Repport from Content Analisys of Interviews (Partners), In:

http://www.ciep.uevora.pt/projectos/doc/iris/RepportfromInterviews-PartnersIRIS-final.pdf

Candeias, A., Grácio, L., Borralho, A., Pomar, C. , Chaleta, E., Pires, H., Dias, C. &

Rodrigues, J. (2007). Repport from Content Analisys of Interviews (Évora), In:

http://www.ciep.uevora.pt/projectos/doc/iris/RepportfromInterviews-Evora-final.pdf

Chaleta, E., Grácio, L., Borralho, A.; Candeias, A.A., Pires, H; Pomar, C.; Vreese,

J., Bernat, E., Evans, J; Negrillo, C.;J.; Brodin, J.; Ljusberg, A-L.,& Cabral, N.

(2009). Contributions from the Community to the Inclusive School. In,

Proceedings from International Conference: Changing Practices in Inclusive

Schools: University of Évora. CD-Rom.

Clark, C. & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought process. In Merlin C. Wittrock

(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.; pp.255-296). New York:

Macmillan.

Fennick, E., & Liddy, D. (2001). Responsibilities and preparation for collaborative teaching:

Co-teachers’ perspectives. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 229–240.

Grácio, L., Borralho, A.; Candeias, A.A., Chaleta, E., Pires, H, Pomar, C; Vreese, J., Bernat,

E., Evans, J; Negrillo, C.;J.; Brodin, J.; Ljusberg, A-L.,& Cabral, N. (2009a). Concepções

de Escola Inclusiva em alguns Países Europeus. In, Proceedings from 1st International

Conference of Psychology and Education. Covilhã (Portugal): University of Beira Interior

(ISBN: 978-989-654-012-8). CD-Rom.

Grácio, L., Borralho, A.; Candeias, A.A., Chaleta, E., Pires, H; Pomar, C.; Chaleta, Vreese, J.,

Bernat, E., Evans, J; Negrillo, C.;J.; Brodin, J.; Ljusberg, A-L.,& Cabral, N. (2009b). Inclusive

Schools: Barriers and Benefits in Some European Countries, In, Proceedings from

International Conference: Changing Practices in Inclusive Schools: University of Évora. CD-

Rom.

Grácio, L., Pomar, A., Candeias, A., Chaleta,E., Boralho, A. & Pires, H. (2008). Analysis of

Interviews Consequences fot Teacher Training. In http://www.ciep.uevora.pt/projectos/doc/iris

Information Exchange (1995). Two way communication. Information Exchange, 4, 6-17.

Page 48: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Linder, C. & Marshall, D. (2003). Reflection and phenomenography: Towards theoretical and

educational development possibilities. Learning and Instruction, 13, 271-284.

Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - A research approach investigating different

understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21, 28-49.

Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion

debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279– 296.

King-Sears, M. E., & Cummings, C. S. (1996). Inclusive practices of classroom teachers.

Remedial and Special Education, 17, 217–225.

Pomar, C.; Grácio, L.; Candeias, A.A.; Santos, G. ; Trindade, M.N.; Pires,H.; Chaleta,E.

(2009). Formação de Professores para a Escola Inclusiva: Fundamentos para uma proposta

de formação. In, Proceedings from 1st International Conference of Psychology and

Education. Covilhã (Portugal): University of Beira Interior (ISBN: 978-989-654-012-8). CD-

Rom

Turner, A. (1996). Cromwell and two trees: An integration project involving secondary aged

students with severe learning difficulties and mainstream peers. SLD Experience, 14, 11.

Glossário

References – Support systems for pupils with specific needs

Candeias, A.A., Trindade, M. N., Santos, G, Rosário, A.C., Rebocho, M., Cortes, M. J.; Saragoça, M. J., Vreese, J., Bernat, E., Evans; Negrillo, C.;J.; Brodin, J.; Ljusberg, A-L.,& Cabral, N. (2009). Inclusive Assessment – From theory to practice in some European countries. In, Proceedings from International Conference: Changing Practices in Inclusive Schools: University of Évora. CD-Rom.

Candeias, A.A., Santo, M.J., Rebocho, M., Cortes, M.J., Santos, G., Chaleta, E., Grácio, L., Pires, H., Dias, C. & Rodrigues, J. (2008). Reflections about assessment and intervention with students with special educational needs. International Journal of Development and Educational Psychology, 1 (4). (pp.405-416).

Elliot, S., Braden, J. & White, J. (2001). Assessing one and all: Educational accountability for childrens with disabilities. Arlington: Council for Exceptional Children.

Elliott, S. & Marquar, A. (2004) Extended time as a testing: Accommodation, its effects and perceived consequences. Exceptional children, 70, 3,349-367

Lloyd, Ch. (2006). Removing barriers to achievement: A strategy for inclusion or exclusion?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12, 2 (221 – 236)

Luke,A.; Woods, A.; Land, R.; Bahr, M. & McFarland, M. (2004). Accountability: Inclusive Assessment, Monitoring And Reporting Queensland: The University of Queensland.

Page 49: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Paula, K. & Enumo. S. (2007). Avaliação assistida e comunicação alternativa: procedimentos para a educação inclusiva. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 13,1, 3-26.

Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Shevlin, Michael and Rose, Richard (2008). Pupils as partners in education decision-making: responding to the legislation in England and Ireland. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23, 4, 423 – 430.

Watkins, A. (Editor) (2007) Assessment in Inclusive Settings: Key Issues for Policy and Practice. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

References – New concepts on teacher training, classroom climate, team work

Ainscow, M. (1993), Teacher education as a strategy for developing inclusive schools. in Slee, R. (Ed), Is there a desk with my name on it? The politics of integration, London, Falmer Press.

Baker, J. & Gottlieb, J. (1980). Attitudes of teachers towards mainstreamed retarded children. Educating mentally retarded persons in the mainstream. Baltimore : University Park Press.

Bartolo, P., Janik, I., Janikova, V., Hofsass, T. (2007). Responding to Student Diversity Teacher-s Handbook, Malta, University of Malta Pub.

Bond, R., & Castagnera, E. (2006). Peer supports and Inclusive Education: an underutilized resource. Theory into Practice, 45 (3), 224-229.

Bush, T. (1995) Theories of educational management, 2nd Edn (London, Paul Chapman).

Carrington, S. & Robinson, R. (2004) A case study of inclusive school development: a journey of learning, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(2), 141–153.

Chang, L. (2003). Variable Effects of Children’s Aggression, Social Withdrawal, and Prosocial Leadership as Functions of Teacher Beliefs and Behaviours Child Development, 74(2), 535-548.

Davis, J., Watson, N., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2000). Learning the Lives of Disabled Children. Developing a Reflexive Approach. In P. Christensen, & A. James (Eds.), Research with Children Perspectives and Practice (pp. 201-224). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Dror, O. (2006). School climate, sense of efficacy and Israeli teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion of students with special needs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(2), 157-174.

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2003). Summary Report: Inclusive Education and Classroom Practices.

Fullan, M. (1999) Change forces: the sequel. London, Falmer.

Grosin, L. (2004). Skolklimat, prestation och anpassning i 21 mellan- och 20 högstadieskolor [School climate, achievement and adaptation in 21 intermediate- and 20 upper level compulsory schools]. Forskningsrapport 71 Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.

Page 50: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Groth, D. (2007). Uppfattningar om specialpedagogiska insatser – aspekter ur elevers och speciallärares perspektiv [Understanding special educational efforts – aspects from pupils and special teachers’ perspective]. Diss. Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet.

Haug, P. (1998). Pedagogiskt dilemma: specialundervisning [A Pedagogic dilemma: special education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.

Hjörne, E. (2004). Excluding for inclusion? Negotiating school careers and identities in pupil welfare settings in the Swedish school Diss. (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 213). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Hunt & Goetz, 1997; Hjörne, E. (2004). Excluding for inclusion? Negotiating school careers and identities in pupil welfare settings in the Swedish school Diss. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 213. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Hugo, M. (2007). Liv och lärande i gymnasieskolan. En studie om elevers och lärares erfarenheter i en liten grupp på gymnasieskolans individuella program [Life and learning in upper secondary school. A study about pupils and teachers experiences in a remedial group in a secondary upper school individual program]. School of Education and Communication Jönköping University. Diss.

Hundeide, K. (2006). Sociokulturella ramar för barns utveckling: barns livsvärldar. [Socio cultural frames for child development]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Jenner, H. (2004). Motivation och motivationsarbete: i skola och behandling [Motivation and motivation works in School and treatment]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.

Katz, J. & Mirenda, P. (2002). Including students with developmental disabilities in general educational classrooms: social benefits. International Journal of Special Education. 17(2), 25-35.

Lovey, J. (2002). Supporting Special Educational Needs in Secondary School Classrooms, London, Davis Fulton pub.

Ljusberg, A-L. (2009). Pupils in remedial classes. Department of youth and child studies. Stockholm University. Diss.

Lundgren, M. (2006). Från barn till elev i riskzon. En analys av skolan som kategoriseringsarena [From Child to pupil at risk. An analysis of school as an arena for categorisation]. Acta Wexionensia nr 98/2006. Diss..

Meadan, H. (2008). Collaboration to Promote Social Competence for Students With Mild Disabilities in the General Classroom - A Structure for Providing Social Support. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(3), 158-167.

Monsen, J. & Frederikson, N. (2004). Teacher’s attitudes towards mainstreaming and their pupils’ perceptions of their classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research 7, 129-142.

Nilholm, C. (2006). Inkludering av elever "i behov av särskilt stöd" vad betyder det och vad vet vi? [Inclusion of pupils “in need of special support” what does it mean and what do we know?]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.

Okolo, C. (2007). Talking about History- Discussions in a Middle School Inclusive Classroom, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(2), 154-165.

Patton G., Bond, L., Carlin, J., Thomas, L., Butler, H., Glover, S., Catalano, R. & Bowes, G. (2006). Promoting Social Inclusion in Schools: A Group-Randomized Trial of Effects on Student Health Risk Behaviour and Well-Being. American Journal of Public Health, 96(9), 1582-1587.

Page 51: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Riehl, C. J. (2000) The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: a review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration, Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55–81.

Rodríguez Garran, N. (2004). El clima escolar. Revista Digital Innovación e Investigación. Num. 7 Volumen 3 Found November; 7, 2008 from http://www.csi-csif.es/andalucia/modules/mod_sevilla/archivos/revistaense/n7v3/clima.PDF

Rose, R. (2002). Including Pupils with Special Educational Needs: beyond rhetoric and towards an understanding of effective classroom practice, Westminster Studies in Education, 25(1), 67-76.

Santos, G. D. (2007). Dançoterapia Integrativa - uma metodologia na intervenção com Comportamentos Agressivos. Tese de Doutoramento, Universidad de Évora.

Sakarneh, M. (2004). in http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/sak04009.pdf acedido a 10-11-2008

Schmidt, M., & Ĉagran, B. (2006). Classroom climate in regular primary school settings with children with special needs. Educational Studies, 32(4), 361 – 372.

Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63, 59-74.

Sebba, J. & Ainscow, M. (1996) International developments in inclusive schooling: mapping the issues, Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(1), 5–18.Skidmore, D. (2004). Inclusion the dynamic of school development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Säljö, R. (1999). Kommunikation som arena för handling – lärande i ett diskursivt perspektiv [Communication as an arena for action – learning in a discourse perspective]. In C.A. Säfström, & L. Östman (Eds.), Textanalys [Analysis of texts]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in practice. A sociocultural perspective]. Stockholm: Prisma.

Terpstra, J. E., & Tamura, R. (2008). Effective social interaction strategies for inclusive settings. Early childhood Educational Journal, 35, 405-411.

Van Reusen, A. K., Shoho, A. R., & Barker, K. S. (2001). High school teacher attitudes toward inclusion. The High School Journal, 7-20.

Ward, J. Center, Y. & Bochner, S. (1994). A question of attitudes: integrating children with disabilities into regular classrooms? British Journal of Special Education. 21(1). 34-39.

Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287-301.

West-Burnham, J. (1997) Managing quality in schools, 2nd Edn (London, Pitman).Westling Allodi, M. (2002). A two-level analysis of classroom climate in relation to social context, grup composition and organization of special support. Learning Environments Research 5, 253-274.

Westwood, P. (2004). Commonsense Methods for children with special educational needs, London

Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., Myers, H., & Nevin, A. (1996). Teacher and administrator perceptions of heterogeneous education. Exceptional Children, 63, 29–45.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Tänkande och språk. [Thought and Language]. Stockholm: Daidalos.

Page 52: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Zollers, N. J., Ramanathan, A. K. & Moonset, Y. (1999) The relationship between school culture and inclusion: how an inclusive culture supports inclusive education, Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 157–174.

Candeias, A.A., Trindade, M. N., Santos, G, Rosário, A.C., Rebocho, M., Cortes, M. J.; Saragoça, M. J., Vreese, J., Bernat, E., Evans, J; Negrillo, C.;J.; Brodin, J.; Ljusberg, A-L.,& Cabral, N. (2009). Inclusive Assessment – From theory to practice in some European countries. In, Proceedings from International Conference: Changing Practices in Inclusive Schools: University of Évora. CD-Rom.

Candeias, A.A., Santo, M.J., Rebocho, M., Cortes, M.J., Santos, G., Chaleta, E., Grácio, L., Pires, H., Dias, C. & Rodrigues, J. (2008). Reflections about assessment and intervention with students with special educational needs. International Journal of Development and Educational Psychology, 1 (4). (pp.405-416).

Earl L. & LeMahieu, P. (1997) Rethinking assessment and accountability. In A. Hargraves (Ed.) Rethinking Educational Changes of Heart and Mind. ACSD Yearbook. Alexandria. VA.

Goodrum, D. Hackling, M. and Rennie, L. (2001) The status and quality of teaching and learning in Australian schools. Canberra Dep.of Ed. and Train.

Kleinert H., Green, P.Hurtle, M., Cleiton J. and Oetinger, C. (2002) Creating and using Meaningful alternate assessment. Teaching Exceptional children, 34,4,40- 47

Lloyd, Ch. (2006). Removing barriers to achievement: A strategy for inclusion or exclusion?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12, 2 (221 – 236)

Pugach M.C. & Warger C.L. (2001). Curriculum matters: Raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22 194-200.

Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Stanford, P. & Reeves, S. (2005). Assessment that drives instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37 (4) 18-22.

Watkins, A. (Editor) (2007) Assessment in Inclusive Settings: Key Issues for Policy and Practice. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

Bibliography:Arnaiz, P (1988): Qui és qui. Les relacions humanes al grup-classe. Barcelona: Ed. GraóBonals, J. (1996): El trabajo en equipo del profesorado. Barcelona: Ed. GraóBoqué, M. C. (2002). Guia de mediació escolar. Programa comprensiu d’activitats. Educació primària i secundària obligatòria. Barcelona: Associació de Mestres Rosa Sensat.Diez de Ulzurrun, A. I Masegosa, A. (1996): La dinàmica de grups en l’acció tutorial. Barcelona: Ed. Graó.Huguet, T (2006): Aprendre junts a l’aula. Una proposta inclusiva. Barcelona: Ed. GraóMullins, L. J. (2007): Management and organisational behaviour.New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 8th edition.Perrenoud, P. (1999): Dix nouvelles competences pour enseigner. Paris: ESF éditeur.

Page 53: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Pujolàs, P. (2003): Aprendre junts alumnes diferents. Vic: Edit Eumo.

References – Teaching inclusively – Aide Memoire a new proposal to assess teachers practices

DFES 2005, Primary National Strategy, KEEP Key Elements of Effective Practice, Acorn

Press.

Brodin,J and Lindstrand,P (2007), ICT and Inclusive education in Primary schools – pupils

with motor disabilities. Perspectives of a school for all. International Journal of Inclusive

Education 11 (2) 133-145

Ljusberg, A-L (2009) Pupils in remedial classes Doctoral Thesis in Child and Youth Studies at

Stockholm University, Sweden

Page 54: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

8. AUTHORS

INTRODUCTION

Authors

Eva BERNAT (Coordinator), Jean-Claude DeVreese ; Carme Negrillo; Jenny Evans ;

Natalia Cabral ; Adelinda Candeias ;Jane Brodin & Ana-Lena Ljusberg

CONCEPTIONS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION WITH SEN

Authors:

M. Luísa Grácio (Coordinator); Adelinda A. Candeias; Clarinda Pomar; António Borralho;

M. Elisa Chaleta; Heldemerina Pires; Jean-Claude DeVreese; Eva Bernat ; Carme Mnegril

Falcó; Jenny Evans; Natalia Cabral; Jane Brodin; Ana-Lena Ljusberg

SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR PUPILS WITH SPECIFIC NEEDS

Authors:

Adelinda A. Candeias (Co-ordinator), M. N. Trindade, G. Santos, A.C. Rosário, M.

Rebocho, M.J. Saragoça,M.João Cortes, Jean-Claude DeVreese, Eva Bernart, Carme Negril

Falcó,Jenny Evans, Natalia Cabral, Jane Brodin, Ana-Lena Ljusberg

CONCEPTIONS ON TEACHER TRAINING, CLASSROOM CLIMATE, TEAM WORK

Authors

Anna-Lena Ljusberg; Graça Duarte Santos ; Negrillo, C; Adelinda A. Candeias (Co-

ordinators)

Jean-Claude DeVreese, Eva Bernart , Jenny Evans, Natalia Cabral, Jane Brodin, Cort, N;

Domingo, M; Pont, M.N; Salvador, N; Sebastià, J. LL; Valls, J. LL; Valverde, F; Vargas,

J.D. ; C. Pomar; M. N. Trindade, G. Santos, A.C. Rosário, M. Rebocho, M.J.

Saragoça,M.João Cortes

 TEACHING INCLUSIVELY

Authors: Jenny Evans (co-ordinator) ; Eva BERNAT, Jean-Claude DeVreese ; Carme Negrillo;

Natalia Cabral ; Adelinda Candeias; Graça Santos, Luisa Gracio, Clarinda Pomar, Nazaret

Trindade e Maria José Saragoça. ; Jane Brodin & Ana-Lena Ljusberg

Page 55: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

10.CREDITS

AUSTRIA

Team SPZ-Graz Sprachheilschule :

FABIAN-PÖLTL Angelika; Diplompädagogin REBOL Susanne, DiplompädagoginSANI Brigitte; MagistraSCHOLZ Sylvia; DiplompädagoginSCHÖN Ingrid; DiplompädagoginSTRAUSS Ursula; MASTROHMAIER Heidrun; Diplompädagogin

Best practice schools in Styria – cooperation in the interviews and trials of AM Volksschule Kronesgasse Volksschule Murfeld Volksschule Viktor KaplanSPZ – Graz Sprachheilschule

For the support to the project

Landesschulrat für Steiermark – LSI Herbert BuchebnerBezirksschulrat Graz - BSI Josef Lang, BSI Johannes Lickl, BSI Wolfgang SchnelzerStadtschulamt Graz – SR Herbert Just

BELGIUM

All the team of the InspectorateAnd particularlyM. André Caussin, Inspecteur coordonnateurMme Claudine Debaty, Secretary

Best practice schools in Belgium – cooperation in the interviews and trials of AM and particularly the Centre Enseignement et Traitements Différenciés (CETD) of Brussels and l’Escalpade of Louvain-la-Neuve.

For the support to the project

M. Dupont, Ministre de l’enseignementM. H. Ingberg, Secrétaire général de la Communauté française M. Delcor frédéric, Secrétaire général de la Communauté françaiseM. J-P Hubin, Administrateur général de la Communauté françaiseM. Beaufort, Chargé de mission auprès du Ministre pour l’enseignement spécialiséMme Simon, Chargée de mission auprès de l’Administration générale de l’enseignement et de la recherche scientifique pour l’enseignement spécialisé

Page 56: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

CATALUNIA/SPAIN

Team(Coordinator) Negrillo, C; Cort, N; Domingo, M; Pont, M.N; Salvador, N; Sebastià, J. LL; Valls, J. LL; Valverde, F; Vargas, J.D

Best practice schoolsCEIP Torroja i Miret. Vila-seca (Tarragonès)CEIP Baltasar Segú. Valls (Alt Camp)IES Serra de Miramar. Valls (Alt Camp)CEIP Sant Ramon. El Pla de Santa Maria (Alt Camp)

UNITED KINGDOM

Best practice schools in Devon – cooperation in the interviews and trials of AM Heathcoat Primary School, TivertonTwo Moors Primary School, TivertonTiverton High School, TivertonSouth West Teacher Training, West Exe Technology College, Exeter

PORTUGAL/EVORA

Team from University of Évora - Portugal Adelinda CandeiasAntónio BorralhoMaria Luísa GrácioClarinda PomarGraça SantosHeldemerina PiresMaria Elisa ChaletaJosé Verdasca

Team from partner institutionsDirecção Regional de Educação do Alentejo – José Verdasca e Maria José SaragoçaAgrupamento de Escolas de Estremoz – Maria João CortesAgrupamento de Escolas de Arraiolos – Mónica Rebocho e Júlio CoincasAgrupamento de Escolas nº 4 de Évora – Ana Cristina Rosário e Gertrudes Pastor

Best practice schools in Alentejo – cooperation in the interviews and trials of AM Agrupamento de Escolas de EstremozAgrupamento de Escolas de ArraiolosAgrupamento de Escolas nº 4 de Évora

For the support to the project Adega Cooperativa de Redondo;

Page 57: Brochure final english[1]

IRIS 128735-CP-1-2006-1-BE-COMENIUS-C21

This Comenius project has been funded with support from the European Commission

Associação APPACDM;ASCTE – Associação sócio-cultural terapêutica de Évora;Borqueijos – Sociedade de Queijos de Borba, Lda.;Câmara Municipal de Évora;Câmara Municipal de Arraiolos;Casa do Porco Preto;CERCI Diana – Cooperativa para a educação, reabilitação e inserção de cidadãos inadaptados de Évora, CRL;Companhia de Seguros AXA Portugal; Delta Cafés,Direcção regional de Educação do Alentejo Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Fundação Eugénio de Almeida; Instituto do Emprego e Formação Profissional – Évora Joaquim M. Charrito Cachopas Papelaria a Borrachinha, Lda Queijos Fialho & Valverde, Lda.Soparlim - Soc. Panificadora Arraiolense, Lda

SWEDEN

Mrs. Jane Brodin, PhdMrs. Ana-Lena Ljuisberg, Phd