Brian Thesis
-
Upload
federico-galeano -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Brian Thesis
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
1/101
Density Analysis of the HIT-SI Spheromak
Brian Scott Victor
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics
University of Washington
2009
Program Authorized to Offer Degree:Aeronautics and Astronautics
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
2/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
3/101
University of WashingtonGraduate School
This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a masters thesis by
Brian Scott Victor
and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects,and that any and all revisions required by the final
examining committee have been made.
Committee Members:
Thomas R. Jarboe
Brian A. Nelson
Date:
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
4/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
5/101
In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a mastersdegree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies
freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis isallowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with fair use as prescribed in theU.S. Copyright Law. Any other reproduction for any purpose or by any means shallnot be allowed without my written permission.
Signature
Date
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
6/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
7/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
8/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
9/101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Chapter 1: Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Importance of Current Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Plasma Current Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.3 HIT-SI Current Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Chapter 2: Overview of the HIT-SI Device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1 Steady Inductive Helicity Injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2 Current Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Chapter 3: Gas Injection System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.1 Fill Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.2 Puff Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Chapter 4: HIT-SI Far Infrared (FIR) Interferometry . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.1 Dispersion Relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.2 FIR System Layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Chapter 5: Reducing Noise Pickup in the FIR Detectors . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.1 Improved SNR on the Scene Detector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.2 Reference Detector Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.3 Software Filters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Chapter 6: Results of Density Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.1 Typical Density Profile Divided into Three Regions . . . . . . . . . . 23
i
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
10/101
6.2 Qualitative Agreement between Plasma Current and Density Fluctua-tions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.3 Plasma Performance in Relation to the Greenwald Limit . . . . . . . 32
Chapter 7: Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Chapter 8: Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
8.1 Gas Pressure Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
8.2 FIR Signal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
8.3 Machine Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Appendix A: Tables of HIT-SI Density Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Appendix B: Description of the Two Cavity FIR Laser System . . . . . . . . 43
B.1 General Overview of the Two Cavity FIR Laser System . . . . . . . . 43
B.2 Standard Operating Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
B.3 Recent Changes to the FIR System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Appendix C: Puff Gas Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
C.1 Calculating the Plenum Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51C.2 The Initial Number of Particles in the Plenum . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
C.3 Puff Plenum Pressure as a Function of Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
C.4 Operational Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Appendix D: Electrical Noise Troubleshooting the FIR Signal Detection System 54
D.1 Scene Signal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
D.2 Reference Signal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Appendix E: Matlab Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
E.1 Density Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
E.2 Tau Based Upon Plateau Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
E.3 Tau Based Upon Density Decay Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
E.4 j/n Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
ii
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
11/101
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Number Page
1.1 Current drive in a z-pinch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Magnetic field generation in a tokamak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Formation of a spheromak using coaxial helicity injection (CHI) . . . 3
2.1 Cross section of HIT-SI. Drawing by John Rogers and Paul Sieck . . 52.2 Injector coils on HIT-SI. Drawing by John Rogers and Paul Sieck . . 6
2.3 Current drive on HIT-SI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.4 Top: injector voltage (V). Middle: injector flux (Wb). Bottom: sphero-mak current (A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.1 Gas injection points. Drawing by John Rogers and Paul Sieck . . . . 10
3.2 Puff gas injection system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3 X-injector pressure transducer reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4 Y-injector pressure transducer reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.1 Layout of the FIR interferometry system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.2 Master laser path through the confinement region . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.1 The 5.8 kHz noise that dominated the blue signal was reduced (redsignal) through the construction of a new scene detector . . . . . . . 21
5.2 The new enclosure houses the Schottky diode, pre-amplifier, and amplifier 21
5.3 Faraday cage further reduces electrostatic noise pickup on the scenesignal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6.1 Regions of the HIT-SI density profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.2 Peak density correlation to fill gas: all shots are taken with a puffpressure of 1000 Torr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
6.3 Shot 114361: Exponential fit to the density decay region . . . . . . . 28
6.4 Plateau density dependence on fill gas pressure: all shots are takenwith a puff pressure of 1000 Torr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6.5 Particle confinement time based upon plateau density . . . . . . . . . 31
iii
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
12/101
6.6 Density and current for shot 114476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.7 Density and current for shot 114476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.8 j/n is Greatest for High Voltage Shots without Fill Gas . . . . . . . . 34
iv
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
13/101
LIST OF TABLES
Table Number Page
3.1 Average particle flow rate from 4.2 to 7.2 ms [1020 s1] . . . . . . . . 13
4.1 Machine dimensions and beam path through the confinement region . 19
A.1 Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114073 - 114075 . 39
A.2 Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114077 - 114460 . 40A.3 Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114461 - 114652 . 41
A.4 Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114659 - 114699 . 42
v
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
14/101
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank my advisor Tom Jarboe for giving me the opportunity to
work on this project, Roger Smith and Cihan Akcay for teaching me the workings
the interferometer, and George Andexler for his technical support and knowledge. I
would also like to acknowledge David Ennis, John Rogers, Brian Nelson, and Will
Hamp for their help and advice.
vi
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
15/101
1
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Importance of Current Drive
Magnetic fields are used to confine plasmas at high enough temperatures for fusion to
occur. Due to the high temperatures reached in a reactor, contact with material walls
contaminates and degrades the plasma. In magnetic confinement devices, internal
plasma currents help to heat and confine the plasma. Plasmas Ohmically heat through
current drive in a similar way to a light bulb heating when current is driven through
the filament. Magnetic field pressure balances particle pressure to confine the plasma.
Plasma currents are typically formed in one of two ways: through electrodes or by
making the plasma the secondary of a transformer and creating a loop voltage.
1.2 Plasma Current Drive
In 1-D configurations, such as z-pinches, electrodes are used at the ends of the con-
finement volume and the voltage potential drives current through the plasma as can
be seen in Fig. 1.1. Z-pinches generate closed magnetic flux, but are susceptible to
sausage and kink instabilities [1]. Adding a magnetic field parallel to the current
helps to stabilize the configuration at the cost of creating open field lines.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
16/101
2
Figure 1.1: Current drive in a z-pinch [2]
2-D configurations eliminate open field lines by connecting the two ends of the
cylinder and creating a torus. Driving plasma current in a toroidal device presents
some difficulties. First of all, the toroidal nature of the device prevents the use of
electrodes. Tokamaks drive plasma current with a central solenoid, where the plasma
acts as the transformer secondary [3]. However, this has only been effective in pulsed
operation. AC operation of the central solenoid has been attempted [4], but plasma
containment has not been shown through the current direction reversal.
Figure 1.2: Magnetic field generation in a tokamak [3]
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
17/101
3
HIT-SI is a magnetic confinement configuration known as a spheromak [5]. Sphero-
maks are advantageous over toroidal devices in that they are topologically sphericaland do not require external toroidal field coils. One method for creating a spheromak
is called Coaxial Helicity Injection (CHI). In CHI spheromaks helicity is injected as
shown in Fig. 1.3. A solenoid, inside the inner electrode, generates vacuum magnetic
field lines between the inner and outer electrodes [6]. Gas is injected and current is
driven between the inner and outer electrodes along the vacuum field lines. Toroidal
Figure 1.3: Formation of a spheromak using coaxial helicity injection (CHI) [7]
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
18/101
4
magnetic fields encircling the inner electrode are formed from this current and, as
the magnetic field line density increases, the pressure forces the plasma into the tunacan flux conserver. The vacuum field lines form into poloidal field lines, which drive
toroidal current in the plasma. Eventually the field lines are stretched to the breaking
point and reconnection occurs. The resulting configuration is a spheromak.
1.3 HIT-SI Current Drive
As will be explained in more detail in the next chapter, HIT-SI uses Steady Inductive
Helicity Injection (SIHI) [8, 9] to inject helicity into a bow tie shaped flux conserver.Through helicity conservation and magnetic relaxation to the eigenstate of the flux
conserver, toroidal plasma current is formed. The constant influx of helicity to the
flux conserver allows for steady-state operation without the use of electrodes.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
19/101
5
Chapter 2
OVERVIEW OF THE HIT-SI DEVICE
Figure 2.1: Cross section of HIT-SI. Drawing by John Rogers and Paul Sieck
The Helicity Injected Torus with Steady Inductive drive (HIT-SI) is a novel ap-
proach for injecting magnetic helicity to form and sustain a spheromak. Using Steady
Inductive Helicity Injection (SIHI) [8, 9], a DC plasma current is generated and formedin the bow-tie flux conserver from AC driven plasma injectors. Figure 2.1 shows the
bow-tie flux conserver, housing the spheromak confinement region, in teal and red,
and the two injectors in yellow and blue. The injectors act as 180 sections of a large
aspect ratio reversed field pinch (RFP) that connect to the spheromak confinement
volume. The confinement region is bow tie shaped to increase the MHD limit for
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
20/101
6
the spheromak equilibrium [10].
2.1 Steady Inductive Helicity Injection
Each plasma injector has a voltage and flux coil to generate magnetic helicity. The
solenoidal-shaped flux coil (right side of Fig. 2.2) establishes flux through the sphero-
mak confinement volume, and the voltage coil (left side of Fig. 2.2) induces a current
along this flux.
Voltage Coils Flux Coils
Figure 2.2: Injector coils on HIT-SI. Drawing by John Rogers and Paul Sieck
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
21/101
7
The helicity injection rate is given by Eq. 2.1 [5]
K= 2Vinjinj (2.1)
whereVinj is the voltage in the voltage coils and inj is the flux in the flux coils. The
voltage and flux coils on a given injector are driven in phase, generating a positive
helicity injection rate at all times
Vinj =Vmaxsin(t) (2.2)
inj = maxsin(t) (2.3)
K= 2Vmaxmaxsin2(t) (2.4)
where = 2fandfis the injector frequency, 5.8 kHz for the data in this thesis. The
injectors are driven 90 out of phase for constant helicity injection when the injectors
operate at equal voltage and fluxes.
K= 2Vmaxmax(cos2(t) + sin2(t)) = 2Vmaxmax (2.5)
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
22/101
8
2.2 Current Drive
Figure 2.3 is a conceptual drawing of the magnetic field lines in HIT-SI. The red lines
are the field lines generated by a given flux coil. Current is driven along these field
lines to inject helicity. Through magnetic relaxation, the blue field lines form as the
magnetic helicity relaxes to its lowest energy state, known as a Taylor state [11]. This
relaxation drives the DC spheromak current.
Figure 2.3: Current drive on HIT-SI [12]
Figure 2.4 shows the injector voltage and flux signals and the resulting spheromak
current for shot 114698.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
23/101
9
X-injector in black. Y-injector in red.
Figure 2.4: Top: injector voltage (V). Middle: injector flux (Wb). Bottom: sphero-mak current (A)
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
24/101
10
Chapter 3
GAS INJECTION SYSTEM
There are two methods of gas injection, one into the confinement region and one
into the midpoint of each injector. Gas injected into the confinement region, used for
pre-ionization, maintains the vacuum vessel at a constant pressure, typically around 2
mTorr. This gas is known as fill gas. Gas injected into the midpoint of each injector
fuels the plasma injectors during the course of the shot. This gas is known as puff
gas. The injection locations are shown in Fig. 3.1 below.
Figure 3.1: Gas injection points. Drawing by John Rogers and Paul Sieck
Red = Fill,Blue = Puff
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
25/101
11
3.1 Fill Gas
The fill gas maintains the vacuum region at a constant pressure and is used for pre-
ionization. During low voltage shots,Vinj < 350 V, pre-ionization is needed for gas
breakdown. Typically a fill gas pressure of 2 mTorr is used; however, higher fill gas
pressures are possible. At higher voltages,Vinj 350 V, the voltage itself is enough
to achieve breakdown, and the fill gas is no longer needed.
3.2 Puff Gas
Puff gas fuels the plasma injectors. Without puff gas the injectors would become
starved, limiting the injector current and decreasing the helicity injection rate. The
layout of the puff gas injection system can be seen in Fig. 3.2.
Figure 3.2: Puff gas injection system
For a typical shot, the feed gas throttle is opened to fill the plenum, shown in red
in Fig. 3.2, to the main gas supply pressure, typically 1000 to 5000 Torr. Shortly
before the beginning of the shot, the solenoid valve is opened allowing He gas at 100
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
26/101
12
psi to begin flowing. This gas, flowing through the area shown in blue in Fig. 3.2,
opens and closes the valves and is not injected into the machine. The increase inpressure opens the N/C valve and then, a short time later, closes the N/O valve.
The interval between the opening of the N/C valve and the closing of the N/O valve
is set by the control gas throttle. After the completion of the shot, the burp valve
is opened, returning the N/C valve to the closed position and the N/O valve to the
opened position. The following pressure measurements, Fig. 3.3 and Fig. 3.4, show the
pressure transducer readings for the X and Y side injectors at different puff plenum
pressures: blue is 5000 Torr, red is 3000 Torr, green is 2000 Torr, and black is 1000Torr. For information on how this measurement was taken see Appendix C.
Blue = 5000 TorrRed = 3000 TorrGreen = 2000 TorrBlack = 1000 Torr
Figure 3.3: X-injector pressure trans-ducer reading Figure 3.4: Y-injector pressure trans-ducer reading
In Fig. 3.3 and Fig. 3.4 each initial plenum pressure shows two curves: one solid
and one dashed. Time zero represents the beginning of the shot, and the end of the
shot is at eight milliseconds for all of the shots in this thesis. The solid curve is the
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
27/101
13
reading with the N/O valve left open. The dashed curve represents the operation
of the puff gas injection system for the data taken in this thesis. The separationbetween the solid and dashed curves occurs when the N/O valve begins to close. The
premature closing of the N/O valve was limiting the injector current late in the shot
and was corrected after the data in this thesis was taken (shot 115106).
Assuming that the flow rate is proportional to the pressure transducer signal,
integrating the signal with the feed gas throttle closed and the N/O valve left open
gives a number proportional to the total number of particles in the plenum.
Pdt Nplenum (3.1)
P =KdN
dt (3.2)
where Nplenum is the total number of particles in the plenum as calculated in Ap-
pendix C, and K is the constant of proportionality to convert between the pres-
sure transducer signal and the particle flow rate. Table 3.1 lists the average par-
ticle flow rates from 4.2 to 7.2 ms for the operating pressures used in this thesis.4.2 and 7.2 ms were chosen because the density for a given shot is relatively con-
stant during this time period. This calculation was made using the MATLAB code
puff_data_integrate3.m , which can be found in Appendix E. Finally, since He is
used as the operating gas, the electron flow rate is twice that of the particle flow rate.
Table 3.1: Average particle flow rate from 4.2 to 7.2 ms [1020 s1]
Initial Puff Pressure X-Injector Y-Injector5000 Torr 17 253000 Torr 11 152000 Torr 7.2 101000 Torr 3.7 5.5
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
28/101
14
Chapter 4
HIT-SI FAR INFRARED (FIR) INTERFEROMETRY
Interferometry measures phase shifts of a coherent light source caused by electro-
magnetic waves in the plasma. This technique provides a non-perturbative, phase-
based method of measuring the chord-averaged electron density. This is advantageous
over perturbative diagnostics, such as the Langmuir probe, which can have deleterious
effects on the plasma performance. Due to the phase-based nature of interferometry,
the measurement can be made without calibration. One disadvantage of interferom-
etry, however, is that it does not provide a local measurement.
4.1 Dispersion Relation
For a plasma with an electron cyclotron frequency, ce, negligible compared to the
frequency of the probing laser light source, ce/ 0, the index of refraction is given
as [13]
N2 = 1 2p2
(4.1)
wherep =
nee2
0me, the plasma frequency, and is the frequency of the light source.
Using a binomial series, this can be rewritten as
N= 1 1
2
2p2
+3
8
4p4
+ . . . (4.2)
For p and using the definition ofp from above, this equation can be approxi-
mated as
N= 1 1
2
nee2
0me2 (4.3)
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
29/101
15
where ne is the electron density, e is the electronic charge, 0 is the permittivity
of free space, and me is the electron mass. The phase difference measured by theinterferometer is given by
= N 1
dl (4.4)
where is the laser wavelength. For a double-pass system, using the value of the
index of refraction from above gives
= nee
2
0me2dl (4.5)
Noting that = 2c
, writing in radians, and rearranging the above equation gives
the line-integrated density as
nedl=
20mec2
e2 (4.6)
where the right-hand side of the equation is constant except , which is the phase
change between the master and slave laser measured by the interferometer. It is
common to report data as the line-averaged density, which is defined as
ne=
nedl
L (4.7)
where L is the chord length through the plasma. The frequency of the master laser
beam is affected by changes in the electron density, while the frequency of the slave
laser beam is relatively constant through the shot. The relative change in frequency
is the source of the phase change in Eqn. 4.6.
Knowledge of the plasma density, within an order of a magnitude, is important
in selecting an appropriate laser wavelength. To balance sensitivity and accuracy
needs to be much larger thanpwhile not being too large for the signal to be drowned
out by mechanical vibrations [13]. A change in of 2 is known as a fringe. For
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
30/101
16
HIT-SI, using ne 1019 m3, with a chord length ofL 1 m, indicates must be
greater than 20m for more than one fringe to be detected. For this reason the bestchoice of wavelength is in the far-infrared spectrum, on the order of 100 m.
4.2 FIR System Layout
A heterodyne detection system is used to measure the line-integrated density. A
schematic of the HIT-SI interferometry system can be seen in Fig. 4.1. An overview
of the interferometer is given in this section and a detailed description of the system
and its operation can be found in Appendix B.
Figure 4.1: Layout of the FIR interferometry system
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
31/101
17
4.2.1 FIR Laser System
The FIR system consists of a CO2 laser that optically pumps two difluoromethane
lasers. The CO2 laser operates at 9.2 m and outputs about 60 W of power at this
wavelength. The two difluoromethane lasers, known as the master and slave lasers,
lase at 184.3 m. The master laser outputs approximately 70 mW of power and
the slave laser outputs approximately 30 mW. Due to the high frequency oscillations
of the plasma density, a beat frequency between the lasers of 3 to 4 MHz is used.
Through trial and error this frequency range was found to limit the number of fringe
jumps encountered in measuring the density.
4.2.2 FIR Signal Detection System
There are two detectors, using quasi-optical corner cube detectors connected to Schot-
tky diodes, that are used to detect the beat frequency between the master and slave
lasers. The signal at the reference detector is used as a basis of comparison for the
beat frequency between the lasers over the duration of the shot. The reference signalis split from the main signal with a silicon mirror, which acts as a beam splitter.
This mirror, when used with the scene detectors silicon-based focusing lens, is able
to produce a large signal on the reference detector with little effect on the magnitude
of the scene detector signal.
The scene detector measures the beat frequency between the master laser, which
passes through the confinement region, and the slave laser. A Martin-Puplett config-
uration is used to achieve this [14]. The slave beam, with horizontal polarization, isreflected by the polarizing beam splitter. The beam then reflects off a rooftop mirror,
oriented 45 to the axis of polarization, rotating the polarization of the scene beam
90. The scene beam then passes through the polarizing beam splitter to the scene
detector. The master beam, with vertical polarization, passes through the polariz-
ing beam splitter. After the beam passes through the confinement region, a second
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
32/101
18
rooftop mirror rotates the beam to horizontal polarization. When the master laser
beam is incident upon the polarizing beam splitter on its return path, it is reflectedto the scene detector.
4.2.3 Beam Path through the Spheromak Confinement Region
A cutaway of the spheromak confinement region is shown in Fig. 4.2. The data taken
in this thesis uses a beam path that reflects off the rooftop mirror above port 7,
shown by the red line in Fig. 4.2. The beam passes through a region of closed flux
as indicated by computer simulations [15]. The dimensions of the machine and beampath are shown in Table 4.1.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
33/101
19
Figure 4.2: Master laser path through the confinement region
Table 4.1: Machine dimensions and beam path through the confinement region
Major radius 0.5 mConfinement Volume 0.38 m3
Volume of each injector 0.025 m3
Impact parameter 0.35 mChord length 0.71 m
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
34/101
20
Chapter 5
REDUCING NOISE PICKUP IN THE FIR DETECTORS
Using a phase-based diagnostic lessens the deleterious effect of electrical noise
pickup. However HIT-SI is a very noisy electromagnetic environment, creating noise
which can degrade the quality of the signal to the point of making the data unusable.
There are two main sources of noise in the FIR signal. One is from the injector voltage
and flux circuits and the other the RF antenna.
5.1 Improved SNR on the Scene Detector
The largest noise source in the scene signal is from the Y-side voltage coil. The noise
pickup is at the frequency of the injectors, 5.8 kHz. To improve the signal to noise
ratio a new scene enclosure was constructed. Before the new enclosure was made,
noise from the injector dominated the beat frequency. After redesigning the scene
enclosure, the noise was significantly reduced (see Fig. 5.1).
The new enclosure for the scene detector was designed to allow the pre-amplifier
and amplifier to be housed in the same enclosure as the detector (see Fig. 5.2). Byshortening the cables connecting the detector to the pre-amplifier and amplifier, the
noise amplitude was reduced by about 50%. Also a Faraday cage was constructed (see
Fig. 5.3) to house the scene enclosure, further reducing the noise by another 50%. The
bias supply was also moved from near the scene detector to inside the screen room in
order to eliminate the need for two enclosures near the machine.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
35/101
21
Figure 5.1: The 5.8 kHz noise that dominated the blue signal was reduced (red signal)through the construction of a new scene detector
Figure 5.2: The new enclosure housesthe Schottky diode, pre-amplifier, andamplifier
Figure 5.3: Faraday cage further re-duces electrostatic noise pickup on thescene signal
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
36/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
37/101
23
Chapter 6
RESULTS OF DENSITY ANALYSIS
Measuring the plasma electron density gives information on fueling dynamics, the
particle confinement time, and the plasma performance in relation to the Greenwald
limit [16]. The two methods of gas injection affect the density profile differently.
Injecting fill gas causes a large initial spike in the density, while puff gas has a larger
effect on the steady-state density. Fluctuations in the density during the second half
of the shot correlate to fluctuations in the spheromak current. Comparing electron
density to spheromak current density indicates the best plasma performance occurs
at higher voltage without fill gas.
6.1 Typical Density Profile Divided into Three Regions
A typical density trace can be broken up into three regions: an initial density spike,
a density decay region, and a density plateau (see Fig. 6.1). First the fill gas pressure
is compared to the initial density spike to find information on the percent ionization.
In the second region, an exponential fit to the density decay gives the confinement
time of the fill gas. Finally, using the particle flow rate of the puff gas and the
approximately steady-state densityplateau density during the end of the shot a
second confinement time is calculated.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
38/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
39/101
25
6.1.1 Region 1: Initial Density Spike
Increasing the initial fill gas pressure leads to an increase in the initial density spike.
The relation between the peak density and the fill gas pressure gives information
on particle ionization. For a constant pressure in the vacuum vessel, the number of
particles in the confinement region and injectors can be found using the ideal gas law:
N=PV
kT (6.1)
where k = 1.381 1023
J/K, T = 298 K, and V = 0.43 m3
, the volume of theconfinement region and injectors. For a fill pressure of 2 mTorr, N = 2.8 1019
particles. For helium as the fill gas this is 5.6 1019 electrons.
Figure 6.2 shows the effect of increasing the fill gas pressure with the puff pressure
at 1000 Torr. The linear fit in Fig. 6.2 does not pass through zero because the puff
gas also has an effect on the peak density. For this reason it is important to look at
the slope of the linear fit at a constant puff pressure. At an injector voltage of 275 V,
an increase in fill pressure of 2 mTorr corresponds to an increase in peak density of2.81019 electrons per m3. Assuming uniform density, this corresponds to an increase
of 1.1 1019 electrons in the confinement region.
Comparing the number of particles in the confinement volume and injectors to the
average electron density, about 20% of the fill electrons are utilized during the initial
density spike.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
40/101
26
Figure 6.2: Peak density correlation to fill gas: all shots are taken with a puff pressureof 1000 Torr
6.1.2 Region 2: Exponential Density Decay gives Fill gas Confinement Time
To calculate a particle confinement time, the number of particles needs to be related
to the particle time rate of change. In the density decay region the number of particles
can be approximated as
N=Aet/ (6.2)
and the particle time rate of change as
dN
dt =A
et/ (6.3)
Relating these two equations gives
= N
dN/dt (6.4)
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
41/101
27
which has units of seconds. Therefore, the coefficient in the exponential fit to the
density decay region gives the particle confinement time. This calculation is based onone chord through the machine and can be made without the assumption of uniform
density throughout the confinement region. The steps taken to make this calculation
are outlined below:
1. The density data is filtered so that an appropriate time for the peak density can
be established.
(a) The start point is 0.1 ms after the peak filtered density.
2. The end point was chosen based upon the shot characteristics. For example, for
shots with higher plateau densities the time interval between the peak density
and the plateau density is short. Therefore an end point 0.8 ms after the start
point was selected. For shots with lower plateau densities an end point up to
1.5 ms after the start point was used.
3. The plateau density, the average density between 4.2 and 7.2 ms, is subtracted
from the total density.
(a) This step is important to make the exponential fit have its zero level equal
to the plateau density.
4. For the selected range of data points, an exponential fit was made to the data
using the MATLAB code listed in Appendix E, n_initial_tau6.m. The expo-
nential fit is made to the unfiltered data.
The resulting values and the time range used can be found in Appendix A. A
typical fit of this exponential to the data is shown in Fig. 6.3, with the exponential fit
shown plotted out to 4.2 ms. Typical values forvaried between 0.5 and 1.5 ms. The
values calculated for were compared to various machine parameters, such as puff
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
42/101
28
pressure, fill pressure, and injector voltage. Little correlation between the machine
parameters and could be found.
Figure 6.3: Shot 114361: Exponential fit to the density decay region
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
43/101
29
6.1.3 Region 3: Confinement Time based upon Plateau Density and Puff Particle
Injection Rate
A second confinement time can be calculated by comparing the plateau density
based upon the assumption of uniform density throughout the confinement regionto
the puff particle injection rate. Similar to the previous section, the confinement time
is calculated by comparing the number of particles to the particle time rate of change.
= N
dN/dt (6.5)
In this case, N is dependent on the plateau density and dN/dt is the puff particle
injection rate. The steps taken to make this calculation are outlined below:
1. The plateau density is calculated as the average density between 4.2 and 7.2 ms.
2. Fig. 6.4 shows that the plateau density increases with increased fill gas. The
slope of the linear fit relates the increase in fill gas pressure to the increase
in plateau density. To calculate the confinement of the puff gas, the plateaudensity dependence on the fill gas is subtracted from the total plateau density.
This means that for an increase of 2 mTorr in fill gas pressure 0.4 1019 m3 is
subtracted from the plateau density for this calculation.
3. The adjusted plateau density is divided by the time dependent puff particle flow
rate between 4.2 and 7.2 ms.
4. The average value forover this time range is calculated.
(a) For details on this calculation refer to the MATLAB code,
puff_data_integrate3.m, in Appendix E.
Fig. 6.5 shows the calculated confinement times for the shots analyzed in this thesis
with an injector flux of 1 mWb and a vertical field of 1 A, where the vertical field is
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
44/101
30
Figure 6.4: Plateau density dependence on fill gas pressure: all shots are taken witha puff pressure of 1000 Torr
a steady-state field in the axial direction. Shots taken with an initial puff pressure
of 1000 Torr tend to have the worst performance. There is a lack of data points
at 5000 Torr because the density measurement tends to have more discontinuities
fringe jumpsat higher operating pressures. In general the best confinement times
result from running the machine at higher injector voltages. This result is consistent
with other measures of plasma performance, such as spheromak current, which have
the best values at higher injector voltages.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
45/101
31
Figure 6.5: Particle confinement time based upon plateau density
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
46/101
32
6.2 Qualitative Agreement between Plasma Current and Density Fluc-
tuations
Looking at the density and current time histories of several shots, times of higher
spheromak current corresponded to increases in density. This observation is most
readily visible during the plateau density period. Figures 6.6 and 6.7 show two shots
with the same machine parameters:Vinj= 275 V, Fill = 2 mTorr, and Puff = 3000 Torr.
The density and current are shown on the same plot for each shot from 2 to 7 ms.
Each plot shows increases in density corresponding to increases in current.
Density fluctuations show qualitativeagreement to spheromak current:
Vinj = 275 V, Fill = 2 mTorr, Puff = 3000 Torr
Figure 6.6: Density and current for shot114476
Figure 6.7: Density and current for shot114476
6.3 Plasma Performance in Relation to the Greenwald Limit
An empirical relationship in plasma physics, known as the Greenwald limit [16], relates
the plasma current density, j, to the electron density, n. Plasmas operating below
j/n = 1014 Am tend to be radiation dominated, thus it is important to pursue a
parameter space with low density in relation to plasma current. By increasing j/n
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
47/101
33
the plasma performance would improve, becoming less radiation-dominated.
The current density is calculated using the following equation
j=ItoroidalA
(6.6)
where Itoroidal is the frequency compensated spheromak current calculated using the
20 external flux loops andA = 0.2 m2 is the cross-sectional area of HIT-SI. Assuming
uniform electron density, the ratio of current density to electron density is calculated
as
jn
= Itoroidal
nA (6.7)
where nis the line-averaged density.
Figure 6.8 shows the maximum value ofj/nfor each shot. Typical plasmas tended
to achieve a peakj/non the order of 1 to 21015 Am. The four shots in the upper-
right portion of Fig. 6.8, with values of j/n approaching 51015 Am, were run with
no fill gas at Vinj = 350 V. To continue to increase j/n, the parameter space in this
regime needs to be further explored.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
48/101
34
Figure 6.8: j/n is Greatest for High Voltage Shots without Fill Gas
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
49/101
35
Chapter 7
CONCLUSION
A study of the puff gas injection system was made. Knowledge of the particle
flow rate aided in the optimization of the feed and control throttle valves to achieve
symmetry in both injectors. This will also allow the injectors to be run without a
decrease in injector current from a lack of puff gas due to the N/O valve closing before
the end of the shot.
In order to reduce the noise pickup on the FIR signal, a new scene detector was
constructed and ground loops near the reference detector were removed. This im-
proved the signal to noise ratio of the scene and reference signals.
Analysis of the density profiles provided two means of calculating the particle
confinement time. An exponential fit to the density decay region showed confinement
times that varied between roughly 0.5 and 1.5 ms. The second confinement time
was found by comparing the plateau density to the puff gas injection rate at that
time. Values for this confinement time averaged 1.5 ms. Comparison of the density
profile to the toroidal plasma current showed that times of high current corresponded
to increases in density. Finally, the ratio of current density to electron density was
calculated for each shot. While all of our shots were below the Greenwald limit, shots
with no fill gas and high voltage approached values of 0 .5 1014 Am.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
50/101
36
Chapter 8
FUTURE WORK
8.1 Gas Pressure Measurement
Pressure increases from the puff gas system need to be measured at the midplane of
the confinement region. This will allow effects on the puff gas injection between the
pressure transducer and confinement region to be measured. Possible asymmetries in
injection rates between the injectors could also be found.
8.2 FIR Signal
To prevent losses in the FIR signal along transmission lines a line driver should be
installed. In order to accommodate the line driver the scene detector enclosure needs
to be redesigned.
8.3 Machine Operation
The control valves for the puff gas system need to be optimized for the fueling of the
injectors. To increase the ratio of current density to electron density the machine
should be operated without fill gas at higher voltages.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
51/101
37
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] U. Shumlak. AA558: Plasma theory, Spring 2008.
[2] ZaP: Z-pinch attributes. http://www.aa.washington.edu/research/ZaP/attributes.html, July 2009.
[3] R. Pitts, R. Buttery, and S. Pinches. Fusion: the way ahead. Physics World,
March 2006. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/24295.
[4] B.J.D. Tubbing et al. AC plasma current operation in the JET tokamak.NuclearFusion, 32(6):967972, 1992.
[5] T.R. Jarboe. Review of spheromak research. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion,36(6):945990, 1994.
[6] How to make a spheromak. http://ve4xm.caltech.edu/Bellan_plasma_page/howto.htm, February 2000.
[7] W.C. Turner, G.C. Goldenbaum, E.H.A. Granneman, J.H. Hammer, C.W. Hart-man, D.S. Prono, and J. Taska. Investigations of the magnetic structure and thedecay of a plasma-gun-generated compact torus. Physics of Fluids, 26(7):19651986, 1983.
[8] T.R. Jarboe. Steady inductive helicity injection and its application to a high-betaspheromak. Fusion Technology, 36(1):8591, 1999.
[9] P.E. Sieck, W.T. Hamp, V.A. Izzo, T.R. Jarboe, B.A. Nelson, R.G. ONeill, A.J.Redd, and R.J. Smith. Initial studies of steady inductive helicity injection on
the HIT-SI experiment. Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on, 33(2):723728,2005.
[10] U. Shumlak and T.R. Jarboe. Stable high beta spheromak equilibria using con-cave flux conservers. Physics of Plasmas, 7(7):29592963, 2000.
[11] J.B. Taylor. Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas.Rev. Mod. Phys.,58(3):741763, 1986.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
52/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
53/101
39
Appendix A
TABLES OF HIT-SI DENSITY DATA
Appendix A lists the shots presented in this thesis. The machine parameters and
calculated values are presented in the tables that follow. All of the shots are run at
inj = 1.0 mWb and a vertical field of 1.0 A.
[1] indicates that decay tau was calculated with the end of fitting period 0.8 ms
after the density peak.
[2] indicates that decay tau was calculated with the end of fitting period 1.5 ms
after the density peak.
[3] indicates that a decay tau couldnt be calculated because of the plasma pa-
rameters.
[4] indicates that the shot contained a VCE fault.
Table A.1: Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114073 - 114075
Shot Fill(mT)
Puff(T)Vinj(V)
PeakItor(kA)
Peak j/n(1015 Am)
Plateau ne(1019 m3)
Decay (ms1)
End (ms1)
114073 2 3000 275 11.9 1.7 2.6 0.51 1.7114074 2 2000 275 7.0 1.3 1.4 0.65 1.1
114075 2 2000 275 3.8 1.2 1.0 0.70 0.6
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
54/101
40
Table A.2: Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114077 - 114460
Shot Fill(mT)
Puff(T)Vinj(V)
PeakItor
(kA)
Peak j/n(1015 Am)
Plateau ne(1019 m3)
Decay (ms1)
End (ms1)
114077 2 2000 275 10.0 1.6 1.5 0.86 1.2114093 4 2000 275 8.0 1.3 2.7 1.3 2.1114094 4 1000 275 4.9 0.6 1.2 1.1 0.9114096 4 2000 300 8.0 1.1 2.3 1.0 1.6114104 2 1000 350 11.0 1.6 0.7 1.0 0.5114106 0 2000 350 20.1 3.6 0.9 [3] 1.0114107 0 3000 350 18.8 4.9 2.8 [3] 2.1114323 2 5000 275 11.2 1.2 4.3 0.64 1.8114356 0 3000 350 20.2 3.8 3.4 [3] 2.5
114359 0 3000 350 20.2 4.6 3.0 [3] 2.2114360 2 3000 325 18.1 1.3 3.5 1.5 2.3114361 2 3000 325 15.5 1.7 3.2 0.99 [1] 2.1114362 2 2000 325 14.1 2.3 2.0 1.1 1.7114363 2 2000 325 9.3 1.5 1.9 0.98 1.7114364 2 2000 325 16.3 2.6 2.1 0.99 1.9114373 2 2000 275 8.7 1.8 2.0 1.6 [1] 1.8114374 2 2000 275 5.6 1.4 2.0 0.79 1.7114457 2 3000 325 15.0 1.2 3.3 1.4 [2] 2.1114459 2 2000 325 16.6 2.2 2.0 [3] 1.8114460 2 2000 325 12.3 1.6 2.2 0.46 2.0
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
55/101
41
Table A.3: Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114461 - 114652
Shot Fill(mT)
Puff(T)Vinj(V)
PeakItor
(kA)
Peak j/n(1015 Am)
Plateau ne(1019 m3)
Decay (ms1)
End (ms1)
114461 2 2000 325 13.7 2.0 1.8 0.63 1.6114465 2 3000 300 13.4 1.2 4.0 [3] 2.7114480 2 3000 300 13.7 1.6 3.3 0.75 2.2114481 2 2000 300 8.2 1.8 1.9 0.93 1.6114482 2 2000 300 11.2 1.2 2.3 0.76 2.1114483 2 2000 300 9.0 1.5 1.9 0.91 1.6114563 2 5000 350 7.0 1.0 0.0 [4] [4]114625 2 2000 325 13.9 2.4 2.1 1.1 1.8114626 2 2000 325 14.6 2.1 2.5 [3] 2.4
114627 2 2000 325 12.7 1.7 2.2 2.0 2.0114628 2 2000 325 12.5 1.8 2.1 1.1 1.9114644 2 1000 300 6.2 0.7 0.7 0.50 0.5114645 2 1000 300 7.0 0.9 0.7 [3] 0.6114646 2 1000 275 2.4 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.6114647 2 1000 275 2.4 0.4 0.8 0.93 0.8114648 4 1000 275 5.7 0.6 1.0 [3] 0.5114649 4 1000 275 6.2 0.7 1.0 1.1 0.4114650 4 1000 275 6.6 0.8 1.1 1.3 0.7114651 4 1000 300 6.9 0.8 1.2 1.2 [2] 0.8114652 4 1000 300 6.7 1.0 1.0 1.5 [2] 0.4
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
56/101
42
Table A.4: Calculated Values from Density Data, HIT-SI Shots 114659 - 114699
Shot Fill(mT)
Puff(T)Vinj(V)
PeakItor
(kA)
Peak j/n(1015 Am)
Plateau ne(1019 m3)
Decay (ms1)
End (ms1)
114659 4 1000 275 6.0 0.8 0.9 1.4 0.2114660 4 1000 275 5.9 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.6114661 6 1000 275 5.1 0.6 1.4 2.4 [2] 0.3114662 6 1000 275 6.4 0.8 1.5 1.3 0.6114663 8 1000 275 7.5 0.7 1.6 1.3 0.0114664 8 1000 275 5.5 0.8 1.9 1.2 [2] 0.6114669 4 1000 325 9.6 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.5114671 6 1000 325 8.0 0.8 1.5 1.2 0.7114673 2 1000 325 8.8 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.6
114674 2 1000 325 7.3 1.1 0.6 0.86 0.4114675 2 2000 350 15.5 1.7 2.2 [3] 2.0114676 2 2000 350 16.5 2.1 1.9 1.0 1.6114687 2 3000 275 12.2 1.3 3.2 0.99 2.1114689 2 3000 300 13.0 1.3 3.2 0.56 2.1114690 2 3000 325 14.7 1.5 3.3 1.1 2.1114691 2 3000 325 15.7 1.6 3.3 0.83 2.1114692 2 3000 350 14.3 1.3 3.0 [3] 1.9114696 4 2000 325 9.6 1.2 2.6 [3] 2.0114698 2 2000 350 18.1 2.2 2.6 [3] 2.4114699 2 2000 350 14.5 1.5 2.5 0.68 2.3
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
57/101
43
Appendix B
DESCRIPTION OF THE TWO CAVITY FIR LASERSYSTEM
Note: this description of the system is taken from Appendix D in R.G.
ONeals dissertation [17] with changes applicable to the current system in
bold.
The two cavity FIR laser system is made primarily of equipment donated from
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and was renovated for use on the HIT-SI
experiment. This appendix gives a general overview of the system and a standard
operating procedure for running the system.
B.1 General Overview of the Two Cavity FIR Laser System
The FIR system consists of a 100 Watt CW rated carbon dioxide pump laser, and
two difluoromethane FIR lasers. The CO2 pump laser is tuned to the 9R32 transition
( 9.2m) with a diffraction grating. The power output measured by calorimeter on
this line is approximately 55 - 65 Watts continuous in practice. The beam is focused
using a 2 m radius concave spherical mirror. Before the beam converges, it is split
by a ZnSe partial reflector. One beam is directed into the master FIR cavity, and
the other into the slave cavity. The optical path is laid out such that the CO2 beamcomes to a waist as it enters the input coupler of the FIR cavities. The FIR input
couplers are 2 diameter mirrors with a 3 mm hole in them for the beam to enter. To
maintain vacuum, the beam is passed through a ZnSe Brewster window, (uncoated
ZnSe glass tilted at its Brewster angle). The CO2 beam expands from its waist at
the entrance hole to fill the FIR cavity. The FIR output couplers are gold-coated
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
58/101
44
silicon wafers and a quartz window for vacuum. The output couplers are mounted
on PZT stacks so that the cavity length can be precisely adjusted. The FIR cavitiesare filled with 55 mTorrof difluoromethane gas, and lase at 184.3m. By tuning
the PZT stacks, a frequency difference of 3 - 4 MHz can be maintained between
the two cavities. The FIR cavities output 30 100 mWatts of FIR light each.
The master beam polarization is rotated by a quartz half-wave plate, so that it is
perpendicular to the slave beam. The beams are combined and made collinear at a
free standing polarizing wire grid. The beams are coupled to a quartz tube which acts
as a waveguide and guided towards the Martin-Puplett interferometer. The beamsare detected with quasi-optical corner cube detectors which have a point contacted
whisker antenna connected to a forward biased low capacitance Schottky-diode. The
intermediate frequency is amplified and digitized.
B.2 Standard Operating Procedures
This subsection describes how to turn the system on, set it up for interferometry, and
shut it down.
B.2.1 Turning on the Data Acquisition
1. Ensure that the reference and scene Schottky detectors are in SHORT or OFF
position.
2. Never jolt/jostle/elctrostatically shock/smack. This could kill the diode. They
are fragile, and very sensitive to electrostatic discharge.
3. Never change the state of bias supplies or amplifiers the detectors are connected
to unless the detector is in the OFF or SHORT position.
4. Turn on the CAMAC crate in the blue rack in the screen room.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
59/101
45
5. Turn on the scene detector preamplifier power supply. It is a small blue box on
a shelf in the northeast corner of the screen room.
6. Turn on the reference detector preamplifier power supply. It is an aluminum
paneled supplyto the left of the scene detector preamplifier power sup-
ply.
7. Turn the reference Bias supply to internal (the middle state of the 3 state
switch). It is located near the reference detector.
8. Turn the oscilloscope on.
9. Turn the reference detector to ON. You should see the reference signal on the
oscilloscope go from clean to noisy.
10. Turn the scene detector bias supply to internal. It is located near the scene
detector preamplifier power supply.
11. Turn the scene detector ON, and then close up the aluminum electrostatic shield
and copper Faraday cage.
12. Check that the scene signal is showing noise on the oscilloscope.
B.2.2 FIR Lasers Start Up
Wear CO2 Safety Goggles When Working Around the Laser!
1. Turn on the Neslab water chiller. It is best to turn this on 30 minutes before
starting the rest of the system so the water cools.
2. Turn on the three PZT bias supplies in the orange rack.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
60/101
46
3. Place one of the kiln bricks in front of the CO2laser, about 1 to 2 feet away from
the output coupler. This will block the beam and allow for the beam strengthand mode to be visualized as a glowing yellow hot spot on the brick.
4. Close the sliding acrylic panels to enclose the business end of the CO2 laser.
5. Start the dry air flow from the yellow air bottle next to the screen room. Verify
that there is pressure in the tank.
6. Open the green Nupro valve under the south-west corner of the laser table wideopen.
7. Adjust the black flow meter valve next to the Nupro until the CO 2 baratron
gauge reads about 5.0 Torr.
8. Flip the blue Spellman HV supply (at the bottom of the orange rack) to on.
9. Position yourself next to the orange rack so that you can see the cathode (outputend electrode) on the CO2 laser.
10. Push the red HV button on the Spellman, and immediately look at the cathode:
If the discharge glows up around the sides of the cathode, push the black
RESET button immediately. Wait 10 seconds, and try again.
If the discharge goes out the pumpout tube, push the black RESET button
immediately. Wait 10 seconds, and try again.
If the discharge does anything else abnormal, push the black RESET but-
ton immediately. Figure out what went wrong, and fix it.
The discharge SHOULD go from JUST the bottom tip of the cathode,
through the laser tube to the anode. It should be white or faint pink. It
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
61/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
62/101
48
250 mVoltspeak to peak on the scene, and 800 mVoltson the reference are
typical. Its hard to describe a concise procedure for this, but here are sometricks.
First, tune the CO2 laser diffraction grating to maximize/clean the signal.
Nudge/Prod the FIR output couplers with your hand to see if moving them
improves anything. If it does, make the appropriate adjustments on the
knobs. Dont touch the PZT stacks, you can get a jolt.
Sometimes, a wide, sweeping scan of the FIR output coupler knobs isrequired to find a good mode. If you do this, first be sure the CO2 is at
good power, make note of where the FIR knob is before moving it, and
move only one FIR knob at a time.
If the signal is strong and sinusoidal, but not at a good frequency, adjust
the PZT bias on either the slave or master to change the frequency.
If the signal has sidebands, or is not sinusoidal, check which FIR cavity is
making the bad signal by sticking your hand in one beam or the other at
the FIR output coupler and seeing which one interrupts the undesirable
signal. Tune that one. Dont stick your hand into the beam at the FIR
input coupler.
If there is no visible signal, make only minor adjustments, nudging and
prodding the output couplers, and CO2 diffraction grating. If that doesnt
work, there is probably something wrong, like a detector/amplifier is off,
there is no difluoromethane gas in the cavity, the beam is obstructed,
the pump laser is on the wrong line, or something. Dont make large
adjustments to the FIR knobs when there is no signal. Instead, look around
for something that is obviously wrong.
If you suspect the pump laser is on the wrong line, put the kiln brick in the
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
63/101
49
pump beam, tune the CO2 until the beam is strong, and remove the brick
again while watching the FIR convectron pressure. If it is the right line,the pump beam will raise the FIR pressure by 5 mTorr within about
two seconds of removing the brick. If it is the wrong line, the pressure will
not change, or will change by 1 to 2 mTorr slowly, over five to ten seconds.
If it is the wrong line, put the brick in and adjust the wavelength knob
in one direction until you find another series of powerful lines. ( 1 2
full turns). Try the pressure test again. If you really get lost, there is a
spectrometer that can be set up. The laser doesnt normally go off of the9R32 line unless youve been adjusting the wavelength knob.
A good intermediate frequency will appear as a clean sinusoidal signal on
both the scene and reference detectors. If you obstruct either the slave or
the master beam at the FIR output couplers, the signal will completely
disappear on both detectors. If the signal does not disappear when an FIR
laser is obstructed, the signal is not a proper intermediate frequency, and
there is a problem in the unobstructed cavity.
B.2.3 FIR System Shut Down
1. Switch the scene and reference detectors to OFF or SHORT position.
2. Switch off the scene and reference detector bias supplies.
3. Turn off the amplifier power supplies.
4. Push the black RESET button on the Spellman HV supply.
5. Wait a few seconds, and then turn off the Spellman HV supply.
6. Open the FIR cavity pumpout valve, and let the FIR lasers pump down.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
64/101
50
7. Turn the green Nupro valve under the south-west corner of the table to closed.
8. Close the yellow dry air bottle.
9. Turn the Neslab chiller off.
10. Turn off the oscilloscope.
11. Turn off the three bias supplies in the orange rack.
12. Check with the operator before turning the CAMAC crate off.
B.3 Recent Changes to the FIR System
The layout of the cooling system was changed to allow higher water pressure to flow.
Currently the cooling system has four parallel paths that originate from the Neslab
chiller: one for the CO2 laser chamber, one for each of the FIR laser chambers, and
one for the laser input and output couplers.
The focusing lens for the scene detector was changed to match the diameter of
the waveguides. A lens made out of HRFZ-SI was purchased in order to achieve a
focal length of one inch with 1.5 inch diameter lens. The lens was purchased from
TYDEX, J.S.Co. Information on this lens can be found at www.tydex.ru
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
65/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
66/101
52
9. For the X-side: Vplenum = 9.7 107 m3
For the Y-side: Vplenum = 8.9 107
m3
C.2 The Initial Number of Particles in the Plenum
The number of particles in the plenum can be found using the ideal gas law:
N=PVplenumkT
(C.2)
wherek = 1.381 1023 J/K and T = 298 K. For an initial pressure of 5000 Torr:
N= 1.6 1020 particles for the X-side
N= 1.4 1020 particles for the Y-side
For helium there are two electrons per particle.
C.3 Puff Plenum Pressure as a Function of Time
1. Hook up the power supply (PCB Piezotronics Model 482A06) to the pressure
transducer (PCB 61 A01)
2. Connect to a digitizer. The data in this thesis was taken using digitizer
\HIT_612_ZZ2:INPUT1.
3. For X-side measurements point the node \PRESS_XINJ:RAWto the correct digi-
tizer input.
4. For Y-side measurements point the node \PRESS_YINJ:RAWto the correct digi-
tizer input.
5. The measurements taken in this thesis are found in shots 114778 to 114805.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
67/101
53
C.4 Operational Notes
Since the flow rate measurements described above were taken, the setting of the
control gas throttle valve was changed so that the N/O valve closes 20 ms after the
beginning of the shot. The pressure transducer measurements for these new settings
are found in shots 115101 to 115105. The feed gas throttle valve has been changed
to ensure that the measured gas pressure at the pressure transducer remains nearly
constant through the duration of the shot. It should also be noted that all of the data
reported in this thesis uses Helium as the operating gas.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
68/101
54
Appendix D
ELECTRICAL NOISE TROUBLESHOOTING THE FIRSIGNAL DETECTION SYSTEM
D.1 Scene Signal
The following are some helpful tips if electrical noise pick up becomes a problem with
the scene signal.
1. If anything is moved inside of the scene detector enclosure it is important to
keep the components electrically isolated from each other and from the walls of
the enclosure.
(a) The pre-amplifier and amplifier should be positioned so that they are sep-
arated by Kapton tape.
(b) Check that none of the connections make a loop to the wall or to the
Schottky diode.
2. The scene enclosure also needs to be isolated from the Faraday cage.
(a) The scene detector should rest on nonconductive material.
(b) Also, the shielding surrounding the output from the scene detector needs
to be isolated from the hole in the back of the Faraday cage.
D.2 Reference Signal
The following are some helpful tips if electrical noise pick up becomes a problem with
the reference signal.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
69/101
55
1. The most common source of noise in the reference signal is from ground loops.
(a) If there is new noise on the signal the most likely cause is that an oscillo-
scope was hooked up without a cheater.
(b) If that doesnt eliminate the noise check that the other electrical equipment
on the laser table are grounded properly.
(c) Also check that the pre-amplifier isnt touching the laser table.
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
70/101
56
Appendix E
MATLAB CODE
E.1 Density Calculation
There are several versions of the density calculation code. Included in the folder is a
readme file that explains the difference between the different codes. Most notably, itis important to calculate the frequency, for filtering purposes, using the stronger of
the reference and scene signals. This program is adapted from the program written
by Griff ONeal [17]. This file is located on the HITSI server at
U:\bvictor\Matlab\den_calc\density_calc_sig7.m
c le ar a l l ; c lo se a l l;
% l oa d t h e i nf o rm at i on from t h e t r e e
load s : \Matlab\ d e n c a l c \ f i r i n i . d at ;
[ a , s t a t u s ] = m ds op en ( l a n da u . h i t : : h i t s i , 0 ) ;
c u r r e n t s h o t = m ds v al u e ( $ s h o t ) ;
disp( [ c u r r e n t s h ot : i n t 2 s t r ( c u r r e n t s h o t ) ] ) ;
shot = f i r i n i (1 );
m dscl ose ;
s h ot i n = input( [ What s h o t ? D e f a u l t : [ i n t 2 s t r ( s h o t ) ] ] ) ;
i f ( s h o t i n ) ;s ho t = s h o t i n ;
end ;
[ a , s t a t u s ] = m ds op en ( l a n da u . h i t : : h i t s i , s h o t ) ;
N c h o r d s = 1 ; %f i r i n i ( 2 ) ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
71/101
57
c h o r d n u m 1 = 7 ; % f i r i n i ( 3 ) ;% c h o r d n um 1 i n = i n p u t ( [ What c h or d ? D e f a u l t i s
% [ i n t 2 s t r ( c hord num1 ) ] ] ) ;% i f ( c h o r d n u m1 i n )% chord num1 = ch or d n um1 i n ;% end ;
disp( [ A n a l y z in g S h ot : i n t 2 s t r ( sho t ) ] ) ;
%%
% s e t s r e f t o t he v al ue o f \f i r r e fr e f = m ds va lu e ( r e f = \ f i r r e f );
% s e t s s i g t o t he v al ue o f \f i r d e t
s i g = m ds va lu e ( s i g = \ f i r d e t ) ;
% t t = m d s va l u e ( d i m o f ( \ f i r r e f ) ) ;
% us e t h i s f o r t he ti me c a l c u l a ti o n t o e ns ur e c on st an t d t t mi n = m ds v al u e ( m i nv a l ( d i m o f ( r e f ) ) ) ;
tm ax = m dsval ue( m axval ( di m of ( r e f )) ) ;
d t = m ds va lu e ( s a m p l i n g i n t e r v a l ( r e f ) ) ;
tt = tmin : dt : tmax;t t = t t ;
%%
% machine parameters
% r a di u s o f t h e p la sma R e f f = 0 . 5 0 ; % [m]
% im pa ct p a ra me t er s o f t h e v a r i o u s c h or d s % add l i n k t o f i l e o f p i c tu r e o f t he c ho rd s
% c h a nn e l 1 i mp ac t p ar a me te r s [m] ( f o r c h or d s 1 10)
i m pa c t l o w er = [ . 1 6 5 5 , . 1 6 5 5 , . 1 6 5 5 , . 2 1 3 7 , . 2 6 1 , . 3 0 6 7 , . 3 5 0 7 , . . .. 3 9 28 , . 4 32 6 , . 4 7 ] ;
% % c h a nn e l 2 i mp ac t p ar a me te r s [m] ( f o r c h or d s 1 10)% i m pa c t u p p er = [ . 2 0 2 , . 2 0 2 , . 2 0 2 , . 2 5 , . 2 9 7 , . 3 4 2 , . 3 8 9 , . . .% . 4 26 8 , . 4 6 5 9 , . 50 1 4 ] ;
% % t he i mp ac t p ar am et er f o r t h e c u r r e nt s h o t i m pact1 = i m pac t l ower ( chord num1 ) ; % . 3 5 0 7 ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
72/101
58
% th e c ho rd l e n gt h f o r t he c ur r en t s ho t c h o r d l e n g t h 1 = 2 sqrt ( R e f f 2 i m pact1 2 );
m dscl ose ;
%%
% al lo ws t he p l o ts t o b e tu rne d o f f
S h o w P l o t s = 0 ;Show = input ( E nt er y t o s ee a l l o f t he p l o ts . , s ) ;i f( strcmp (Show , y ))
S h o w P l o t s = 1 ;end
% a l l o ws an a u t oc o r r ec t i o n a l go r it h m t o b e u se d % 1 = on , 0 = o f f A u t o C o r r e c t = 0 ;
%%
% cr op t h e n umber o f d at a p o in t s , e l i m i na t i n g p o i nt s b e f o r e and a f t e r s h ot % o r i g in a l s t a r t t ime = 0 .0 02 6 s , e nd t i me = 0 . 0 18 s t s = 0. 0005; % new s t a r t t im e t e = 0 . 0 1 2 4 ; % new e nd t i m e [ aa , Is ] = min(( ttt s ) . 2 ) ; % fi n d t he p oi nt n ea r es t t he s t a r t t im e [ bb , Ie ] = min(( ttt e ) . 2 ) ; % f in d t he p oi nt n ea r es t t he end t ime t = t t ( I s : I e ) ; % c ro p t h e t im e t m = 1 0 0 0 t ; % g iv e s t he ti me i n m i l li s e co n d s p o i nt s = length ( t ) ; % l e n gt h o f t he v e ct o r c r e f = r e f ( I s : I e ) ; % c ro p r e f s i g n a l c s i g = s i g ( I s : I e ) ; % cr op s ce ne s i g n a l
%%
% v a lu e s us ed f o r f r e q c a l c u l a t i on s S a m p l e r a t e = round ( 1 / d t ) ; % av e n umber o f p t s p er s e c F n y q u i st = S a m p l e r a t e / 2 ; % N y q ui s t f r e q ue n c y
disp( [ S a m p le r a t e = i n t 2 s t r ( S a m p le r a t e / 1 e3 ) . . .
KS/ s e c ; Time S t ep = i n t 2 s t r ( dt 1 e 6 ) m i c r o s e c ] ) ;
%%% th e n ex t t wo s e c t io n s c a l c u l a t e t he f re qu en cy o f t he r e f and s ce ne % s i g na l s f or f i l t e r i n g p ur po se s . I t i s b e st t o c a l cu l a te t he f re qu en cy % f rom w h ic h ev e r s i g n a l h as a l a r g e r m ag ni tu de %%
% c a lc u l at e t he f re qu en cy o f t he r e f s i g na l
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
73/101
59
r e f p o i n t s = round ( . 0 0 0 2 / dt ) ;
% re mo vi ng a 0 t h o rd er dc o f f s e t b a s e r e f = c r e f ( 1 : r e f p o i n t s ) sum( c r e f ( 1 : r e f p o i n t s ) ) . . .
/ length ( c r e f ( 1 : r e f p o i n t s ) ) ;% m u lt i pl y s u c ce s s i ve p o in t s c r o s s p o i n t s = b a s e r e f ( 1 : length ( b a s e r e f ) 1). . . .
b a s e r e f ( 2 : length ( b a s e r e f ) ) ;% c re a te v e ct o r w it h 1 s a t c r o ss i n gs and 0 e l se w he r e c r o s s p o i n t s = ( c r o s s p o i n t s . / ( abs ( c r o s s p o i n t s ) ) 1 ) / (2 );
% t o t a l z er o c r os s in g s z c t r e f = sum( c r o s s p o i n t s ) ;
% f r e q u e n c y r e f f r e q = ( z c t r e f / 2) /( length ( b a s e r e f ) dt ) ;
disp( [ R e f e r e n c e F re qu en cy = i n t 2 s t r ( r e f f r e q / 1 0 00 ) kHz ] ) ;
%%
% c a l c u l at e t he f re qu en cy o f t he s ce ne s i g n a l % lo ok in g a t f i r s t . 2 ms t o a vo id i n je c t or f r eq p ic k up
% r e f er e n c e d e t e c t o r s i g p o i n t s = round ( . 0 0 0 2 / dt ) ;
% re mo vi ng a 0 t h o rd er dc o f f s e t % fr om b e g i nn i n g p o i n t s b a s e s i g = c s i g ( 1 : s i g p o i n t s ) sum( c s i g ( 1 : s i g p o i n t s ) ) / . . .
length ( c r e f ( 1 : s i g p o i n t s ) ) ;% m u lt i pl y s u c ce s s i ve p o in t s c r o s s p o i n t s s i g = b a se s i g ( 1 : length ( b a s e s i g ) 1). . . .
b a s e s i g ( 2 : length ( b a s e s i g ) ) ;% c re a te v e ct o r w it h 1 s a t c r o ss i n gs and 0 e l se w he r e c r o s s p o i n t s s i g = ( c r o s s p o i n t s s i g . / ( abs ( c r o s s p o i n t s s i g ) ) 1)/( 2) ;
% t o t a l z er o c r os s in g s z c t s i g = sum( c r o s s p o i n t s s i g ) ;
% f r e q u e n c y s i g f r e q = ( z c t s i g / 2) /( s i g p o i n t s dt ) ;
disp( [ Scene F requency = i n t 2 s t r ( s i g f r e q / 1 0 00 ) kHz ] ) ;
% se t t i ng t he r e f f r eq t o t h e s i g f r eq b ec aus e t h e s i g f r eq i s more % a cc ur at e f o r f i l t e r i n g p ur po se s r e f f r e q = s i g f r e q ;
%%%%
% f i l t e r t h e s i g n a l s
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
74/101
60
%%
% r e f e r e n c e f i l t e r % h a l f b an dw i dt h ( Hz )h b w r e f = min( 1 8 0 0 0 0 , . 2 r e f f r e q ) ;
% o r d e r o f t h e f i l t e r / 2 n r e f = 1 ;
% n o r ma l i z in g w . r . t . t h e N y qu i s t f r e q l o w f r e q r e f = ( r e f f r e q hbwref )/ Fnyqui st ;h i g h f r e q r e f = ( r e f f r e q + h b wr ef ) / F n yq u is t ;Wn ref = [ l o w f r e q r e f , h i g h f r e q r e f ] ;% f i l t e r i n g w it h t he b u t t er f i l t e r [ b r e f , a r e f ] = b u t t e r ( n r e f , W n r ef ) ;
% u s i ng t h e s e v a r i a b l e s t o f i l t e r t h e c ro pp ed r e f s i g n a l f i l r e f = f i l t f i l t ( b r e f , a r e f , c r e f ) ;
% p l ot t he r e f s i g na l ( raw a nd f i l t e r e d )i f( ShowPlots ) ;
f i g u r e( 1 ) ;c l f;grid;t i t l e ( [ S ho t i n t 2 s t r ( s h o t ) : R e f e r e n c e S i g n a l ] , F o n t Si z e , 1 4 ) ;hold on ;plot ( t m , c r e f , r , t m , f i l r e f , b ) ;h1 = legend ( Raw , F i l t e r e d ) ;se t ( h 1 , I n t e r p r e t e r , n o ne ) ;xlabel ( Time [ m s] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWeight , bol d ) ;ylabel ( S i g n a l S t r e n g t h [ V ] , F o n t S i z e , 1 2 , F o nt We ig ht , b o l d ) ;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
end ;
%%
% scene f i l t e r % h a l f b an dw i dt h ( Hz )hbwdet = min( . 7 e6 , s i g f r e q .3 e6 ) ;%o r d e r o f t h e f i l t e r / 2 n s i g = 3 ;
% n o r ma l i z in g w . r . t . t h e N y qu i s t f r e q l o w f r e q s i g = ( s i g f r e q hbwdet)/ Fnyq uist ;
h i g h f r e q s i g = ( s i g f r e q + h bwdet ) / F n yq u is t ;Wn sig = [ l o w f r e q s i g , h i g h f r e q s i g ] ;% f i l t e r i n g w it h t he b u t t er f i l t e r [ b s i g , a s i g ] = b u t t er ( n s i g , Wn s ig ) ;
% u s i ng t h e s e v a r i a b l e s t o f i l t e r t h e c ro pp ed s ce ne s i g n a l f i l s i g = f i l t f i l t ( b s i g , a s i g , c s i g ) ;
% p l o t t he s ce ne s i g n a l ( raw a nd f i l t e r e d )i f( ShowPlots ) ;
f i g u r e( 2 ) ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
75/101
61
c l f;grid;
t i t l e ( [ S ho t i n t 2 s t r ( s h o t ) : S c en e S i g n a l ] , F o n t Si z e , 1 4 ) ;hold on ;plot ( t m , c s i g , r , t m , f i l s i g , b ) ;h2 = legend ( Raw , F i l t e r e d ) ;s et ( h2 , I n t e r p r e t e r , n on e ) ;xlabel ( Time [ m s] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWei ght , bol d ) ;ylabel ( S i g n a l S t r e n g t h [ V ] , F o n t S i z e , 1 2 , F o nt We ig ht , b o l d ) ;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
end ;
%%%%
% c a l c u l a t e and p l o t t he f f t s
%%
% r e f er e nc e s i g n a l
% u nf i l t e re d r e f s i g na l r e f f f t d u m = abs (f f t ( c r e f ) ) ;N r e f f f t d u m = length ( r e f f f t d u m ) ;r e f f f t = r e f f f t d u m ( 1 : round( N r e f f f t d u m / 2 ) ) ;N r e f f f t = length ( r e f f f t ) ;p l o t r e f f f t = 10 log10 ( r e f f f t /max( r e f f f t ) ) ;
% f i l t e r e d r e f s i g n a l f i l r e f f f t d u m = abs (f f t( f i l r e f ) ) ;N f i l r e f f f t d u m = length ( f i l r e f f f t d u m ) ;f i l r e f f f t = f i l r e f f f t d u m ( 1 : round( N f i l r e f f f t d u m / 2 ) ) ;N f i l r e f f f t = length ( f i l r e f f f t ) ;p l o t f i l r e f f f t = 10 log10 ( f i l r e f f f t /max( f i l r e f f f t ) ) ;
% f r e q ue n c y b a se f r e q b a s e r e f = ( 0 : N r e f f f t 1) F n y qu i st / ( N r e f f f t 1 ) ;
i f( ShowPl ots ) ;f i g u r e( 3 ) ;
c l f;hold on ;t i t l e ( [ S ho t i n t 2 s t r ( s h o t ) : R e f e r e n c e FFT ] , F o n t Si z e , 1 4 ) ;plot ( f r e q b a s e r e f /1 e6 , p l o t r e f f f t , r ) ;plot ( f r e q b a s e r e f / 1 e 6 , p l o t f i l r e f f f t , b ) ;h3 = legend ( Raw , F i l t e r e d ) ;s et ( h3 , I n t e r p r e t e r , n on e ) ;xlabel ( Frequency [ MHz] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWeight , bol d ) ;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
end ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
76/101
62
%%
% sc en e s i g n a l
% u n f i l t e r e d s ce ne s i g n a l s i g f f t d u m = abs (f f t ( c s i g ) ) ;N s i g f f t d u m = length ( s i g f f t d u m ) ;s i g f f t = s i g f f t d u m ( 1 : round( N s i g f f t d u m / 2 ) ) ;N s i g f f t = length ( s i g f f t ) ;p l o t s i g f f t = 10 log10 ( s i g f f t /max( s i g f f t ) ) ;
% f i l t e r e d s ce ne s i g na l f i l s i g f f t d u m = abs (f f t( f i l s i g ) ) ;N f i l s i g f f t d u m = length ( f i l s i g f f t d u m ) ;
f i l s i g f f t = f i l s i g f f t d u m ( 1 : round( N f i l s i g f f t d u m / 2 ) ) ;N f i l s i g f f t = length ( f i l s i g f f t ) ;p l o t f i l s i g f f t = 10 log10 ( f i l s i g f f t /max( f i l s i g f f t ) ) ;
% f r e q ue n c y b a se f r e q b a s e s i g = ( 0 : N s i g f f t 1 )F n y qu i st / ( N s i g f f t 1 ) ;
i f( ShowPlots ) ;f i g u r e( 4 ) ;c l f;hold on ;t i t l e ( [ S ho t i n t 2 s t r ( s h o t ) : S c e ne FFT ] , F o n t S i z e , 1 4 ) ;plot ( f r e q b a s e s i g /1 e6 , p l o t s i g f f t , r ) ;plot ( f r e q b a s e s i g / 1 e6 , p l o t f i l s i g f f t , b ) ;h3 = legend ( Raw , F i l t e r e d ) ;se t ( h 3 , I n t e r p r e t e r , n o ne ) ;xlabel ( Frequency [ MHz] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWei ght , bol d ) ;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
end ;
%%%%
% f in d t he z er o c r os s in g s o f t h e f i l t e r e d s i g na l s
%%
% r ef er en ce f i l t e r e d s i gn a l
% mu l ti pl y s u cc e ss i ve p oi nt s o f t he f i l t e r e d s i g na l r e f f i l z e r o s = f i l r e f ( 1: po in ts 1 ) . f i l r e f ( 2: p oi nt s ) ;
% c re a te v e ct o r w it h 1 s a t c r o ss i n gs and 0 e l se w he r e r e f f i l z e r o s = ( r e f f i l z e r o s . / abs ( r e f f i l z e r o s ) 1)/( 2) ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
77/101
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
78/101
64
s i g f i l z e r o s = f i l s i g ( 1: po in ts 1 ) . f i l s i g ( 2: p oi nt s ) ;
% c re a te v e ct o r w it h 1 s a t c r o ss i n gs and 0 e l se w he r e s i g f i l z e r o s = ( s i g f i l z e r o s ./ abs ( s i g f i l z e r o s ) 1)/( 2) ;
% f i nd t he l o c a t io n s o f t he c r os s in g p o in t s k s i g = find ( s i g f i l z e r o s ) ;
% fi nd t he t o t a l number o f z er o c r os s in g s o f f i l t e r e d s i g na l z c t s i g f i l = sum( s i g f i l z e r o s ) ;
%%
% c a l c u l at i o n s us ed t o f i nd t he c hang e i n ph as e o f t he s ce ne s i g n a l
% t h i s f i n ds t he t ime t h at t he z er o c r os s i ng a c t u a l l y o cc ur s b y % i n t e r p o l at i n g b etw ee n t he p oi nt b e fo r e and a f t e r t he z er o c r o ss i ng tde t (1 : z c t s i g f i l ) = t ( k si g ) dt f i l s i g ( k si g ). / ( f i l s i g ( k si g +1) . . .
f i l s i g ( k s ig ) ) ;
% c re a t es a v e ct o r t he s i z e o f t he number o f z er o c r o ss i n gs % ea ch z er o c r os s i ng i n cr e as e s t he v a lu e by p i % z c1 = pi , z c2 = 2 p i , z c3 = 3 p i% t h i s a l l o w s t h e z e ro c r o s s i n g s t o b e c h an ge d t o a measurement i n r a di a ns p h as e s i g = cumsum( pi one s ( s i z e ( t d e t ) ) ) ;
% t h i s c a l c u l a ti o n u se s t he s ame t b as e as f rom t he r e f s i g n a l c a l c u l a ti o n
% i n t e r p ol a t e s t he p r og r es s io n o f t he p lo t , u si ng t he z er o c r o ss i ng s a s t h e % de f in in g p oi nt s o f t he p l o t % p h re f i s t he phase v al ue a t each p oi nt o f t ba se p h s i g = interp1 ( t de t , p h a s e s i g , t b a se ) ;
% t he v al ue o f t he s ce ne s i g n a l c ompared t o i t s f i r s t v a lu e v a l p h s i g = p h s i g p h s i g ( 1 ) ;
%%
% t he p ha se c ha ng e b et we en t h e s ce ne and r e f s i g n a l s d e lt a p h i = v a l p h r e f v a l p h s i g ;
%%%%
% l oo k f or bad s po ts i n t h e r e f s i g na l % pl a ce s where t he av e a m pl it ud e o f t he s i g n a l i s l e s s t ha n 0 . 3 t im es t he % o v e r a l l a ve a mp li tu de % t he sum o f t h e s q ua re s o f a l l p oi nt s o f t h e f i l t e r e d r e f s i gn a l r e f s t r e n g t h = sum( f i l r e f . 2 )/ po in ts ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
79/101
65
% d e f i ne s t h e w indow o ve r w hi ch t o a ve ra ge t h e s i g n a l s t r e n g t h % number o f p o i n ts i n 50 p e r i od s
b a d s p o t w i n d o w = round ( 1 /( s i g f r e q d t ) ) ;
%i n i t i a l i z e t he v ec to r b a d s p o t r e f = zeros ( 1 , p o i n t s ) ;
% l oo k in g o ve r a g iv en i n t e r v a l % t h i s a lg or it hm c a l c u l a t e s t he a ve ra ge s i g n a l s t r en g t h o ve r a g iv en % i n t e r v a l and c r e at e s a v e ct o r marking t he l o c at i o n o f t he bad s p ot s f or k = 1 : round( b a d s p o t w in d ow / 2 ) : p o i n t s b a d s p o t w i n d o w 1 ;
l o c a l s t r e n g t h r e f = sum( f i l r e f ( k : k + b a d s p o t w i n d o w ) . 2 ) . . ./bad spot wi ndow ;
i f ( l o c a l s t r e n g t h r e f < . 3 r e f s t r e n g t h ) ;b a d s p o t r e f ( k : k + b ad s p ot w i nd ow 1 ) = . . .
o n e s ( 1 , b a d s p o t w i n d ow ) ;end ;
end ;
% i n t e r p o l at e t he bad s p ot s o nto t he t ime r a te i n t e r p b s r = interp1 ( t , b a d s p o t r e f , t b as e ) ;
%%
% l o ok f o r b ad s p ot s i n t h e s ce ne s i g n a l % pl a ce s where t he av e a m pl it ud e o f t he s i g n a l i s l e s s t ha n 0 . 3 t im es t he % o v e r a l l a ve a mp li tu de % t he sum o f t h e s q ua re s o f a l l p oi nt s o f t h e f i l t e r e d r e f s i g na l s i g s t r e n g t h = sum( f i l s i g . 2 )/ po in ts ;
%i n i t i a l i z e t he v ec to r b a d s p o t s i g = zeros ( 1 , p o i n t s ) ;
% l oo k in g o ve r a g iv en i n t e r v a l % t h i s a lg or it hm c a l c u l a t e s t he a ve ra ge s i g n a l s t r en g t h o ve r a g iv en % i n t e r v a l and c r e at e s a v e ct o r marking t he l o c at i o n o f t he bad s p ot s f or k = 1 : round( b a d s p o t w in d ow / 2 ) : p o i n t s b a d s p o t w i n d o w 1 ;
l o c a l s t r e n g t h s i g = sum( f i l s i g ( k : k + b a d s p o t w i n d o w ) . 2 ) . . ./bad spot wi ndow ;
i f ( l o c a l s t r e n g t h s i g < . 0 4 s i g s t r e n g t h ) ;
b a d s p o t s i g ( k : k + b ad s p ot w i nd ow 1 ) = . . .o n e s ( 1 , b a d s p o t w i n d ow ) ;end ;
end ;
% i n t e r p o l at e t he bad s p ot s o nto t he t ime r a te i n t e r p b s s = interp1 ( t , b a d s p o t s i g , t b as e ) ;
%%%%
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
80/101
66
i f( ShowPlots ) ;
f i g u r e( 2 2 ) ;plot ( t d e t ( 1 : end 1)1 e3 , 1 . / ( 2 ( t d e t ( 2 : end) t d e t ( 1 : end1)))/1e6 ) ;t i t l e ( [ S ho t i n t 2 s t r ( shot ) . . .
: F re qu en cy o f e ac h h a l f p e r i o d ( S c e n e ) ] , F o n t Si z e , 1 4 ) ;xlabel ( Time [ m s] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWeight , bol d ) ;ylabel ( Frequency [ MHz] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWei ght , bol d ) ;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
f i g u r e( 2 3 ) ;plot ( t r e f ( 1 : end 1)1 e3 , 1 . / ( 2 ( t r e f ( 2 : end) t r e f ( 1 : end1)))/1e6 ) ;t i t l e ( [ S ho t i n t 2 s t r ( shot ) . . .
: F re qu en cy o f e ac h h a l f p e r i o d ( R e f ) ] , F o n t Si z e , 1 4 ) ;xlabel ( Time [ m s] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWeight , bol d ) ;
ylabel ( Frequency [ MHz] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWei ght , bol d ) ;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
end
%%%%
% p lo t o f b ot h f i l t e r e d s i g na l s and t he phase d i f fe r e nc e
m r e f = max( f i l r e f ) ;
m s i g = max( f i l s i g ) ;
f i g u r e( 5 ) ;c l f;t i t l e ( [ S hot i n t 2 s t r ( s h ot ) : F i l t e r e d S i g n a l s ] , F o nt S iz e , 1 4 ) ;hold on ;plot (t m , pi f i l r e f /m ref , b , t m , pi f i l s i g /m sig , r ) ;plot ( tbas e 1e3 , mod ( d e l t a p h i , 2pi ) + pi , k ) ;h5 = legend ( R e f e r e n c e , S c e ne , P h a se C ha ng e ) ;se t ( h5 , I n t e r p r e t e r , n o ne ) ;xlabel ( Time [ m s] , FontSi ze , 12 , FontWeight , bol d ) ;grid;f i g u r e ( gcf) ;
%%%%
% d e ns i t y c a l c u l a ti o n
% d ef i ne v a r i a b l e s
% s pe ed o f l i g h t [m/ s ] c = 3 e 8 ;
-
8/12/2019 Brian Thesis
81/101
67
% e l e c t r o n mass [ k g ] m e = 9 . 1 0 9 3 8 2 e31 ;
% m ag ni tu de o f e l e c t r o n c h ar g e [ C] q e = 1 . 6 0 2 1 7 6 5 e19 ;
% p e r m i t t i v i y o f f r e e s pa ce [ C2 N 1 m2]e 0 = 8 . 8 5 4 1 8 7 8 e12 ;
% a common qu an ti ty c o n s t a n t = q e 2 /( 4pi 2 e0m e ) ;
% w a v e le n g th o f d i f l uo r o me t