Bretton Woods 2020 - LIMUN1).pdfBretton Woods 2020 London International Model United Nations 2020...
Transcript of Bretton Woods 2020 - LIMUN1).pdfBretton Woods 2020 London International Model United Nations 2020...
1
Bretton Woods 2020 London International Model United Nations
21st Session | 2020
2
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Table of Contents
TOPIC A: Reforming the International Trade Regime 7
Definitions 9
Timeline of Events 13
Discussion of the Problem 15
Bloc Positions 19
Conclusion 21
Questions a Resolution should answer: 22
Further Reading 23
Bibliography 25
TOPIC B: Assessing the Reserve Currency System 27
Definitions 29
Timeline of Events 30
Discussion 33
Bloc Positions 35
Conclusion 37
Questions a Resolution should answer: 38
Further Reading 38
Bibliography 39
3
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Dear Delegates,
Welcome to LIMUN 2020! Every year, LIMUN delivers some of the
highest-quality Model UN debate in the country, and this year promises
much the same.
We’re excited to be simulating the Bretton Woods Committee (2020), a
novel simulation that, to our knowledge, has not been run in the UK MUN
circuit. Our committee will give you the chance to research and engage
with the structures that have held up the world order since 1945 – and
which are being challenged in the tumultuous times in which we live.
We look forward to seeing you in February!
Best wishes,
Your Chairing Team
INTRODUCTION LETTER
4
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Director – Allen Haugh
Dear Delegates,
Welcome to LIMUN 2020! My name is Allen, and I’m a finalist studying
Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at Oxford. I’ll have the pleasure of
serving as your Director for the Bretton Woods Committee (2020).
I attended LIMUN for the last two years as a delegate and then as a chair;
in that time, I’ve come to appreciate the professionalism of the
conference and the high quality of debate that it entails. That said, LIMUN
is some of the most fun I’ve had at an MUN conference; I’m looking
forward to a similar experience this year!
Best wishes,
Allen Haugh
5
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Assistant Director – Kevin Chuang
Dear Delegates,
Welcome to LIMUN 2020, and welcome to the Bretton Woods Committee
2020. My name is Sheng-Wei Kevin Chuang and I’ll be serving as your
Assistant Director. Having attended LIMUN for the past two years as a
delegate, I have a deep respect for LIMUN’s chairing and debate quality. As
such, I strive to put my 40-some conference experience to use in creating
an enjoyable debate that both challenges and helps you grow as delegates.
Bretton Woods Committee 2020 differs from other more ‘traditional’
committees as you are tasked to represent individuals who are current or
former policymakers within the US government, or as select
representatives of foreign governments. As such, beyond your
commitments to your government and character’s values, you are to
consider the interests and positions of the organizations that you’ve served
in. Nonetheless, Bretton Woods 2020 seeks to tackle the vexing issues
relating to international trade and monetary system. It is my hope that this
committee offers you a challenging, yet stimulating debate, and greater
insight into the behind-the-scenes political considerations that real-life
policymakers face.
6
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Introduction to the Committee:
The Bretton Woods Committee is an American organisation that was
founded in 1983 and was designed to be an “an organized effort to ensure
that leading citizens spoke about the importance of the international
financial institutions (IFIs)”1. The primary IFIs the group focused on were
the two Bretton Woods Institutions – the IMF and World Bank – though
the topics the Committee addresses have expanded to include broader
development and economic themes.
The Committee has more than 650 members from academia, non-profits,
businesses, and governments. It organizes conferences and seminars on
the importance of economic cooperation and lobbies the US Congress on
the same. As such, the Committee does not have a formal mandate
beyond the ones it has set itself; nor does it any executive powers.
In this simulation, you will represent individual members of the Bretton
Woods Committee. You will be charged with researching the organizations
they are affiliated with and forming viewpoints on the topics in this guide.
In committee, you will seek to form consensus viewpoints on the positions
the Bretton Woods Committee should take, writing detailed position
statements in lieu of formal resolutions.
1 About the Committee. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.brettonwoods.org/page/about-the-
committee.
7
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
TOPIC A: Reforming the
International Trade
Regime
8
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Introduction
With the rise of what is termed the “trade-investment-services”
nexus2 and the diffusion of economic power to countries of the “Global
South,” calls for reforming the international trade regime – rules, norms,
and practices set forth by the World Trade Organization – is not a new
phenomenon. As the Bretton Woods Committee – an American
organization dedicated to ensuring the continued prominence and
centrality of the Bretton Woods Institutions in the international economic
order – delegates are in a unique position to examine ongoing systemic
issues within the international trade regime from both the perspectives of
individual American policymakers and select foreign representatives.
While the issues that confront the international trade regime is far-
reaching, delegates are expected to focus on the issues that underlie the
ongoing US-Chinese trade war. As such, this study guide will be oriented
towards issues such as unfair trade practices, WTO structures and
categorization system – this would entail a particular focus on: non-tariff
protectionist policies, currency devaluation, dispute-settlement
mechanisms, definitions of developing and developed nations, and the
practice and future of special and differential treatment in relation to
infant industry protection and ‘catching-up’ by developing nations.
Given the nature of this committee, the study guide will focus
mostly on contextualising the aforementioned issues within the context of
2 Baldwin, R. (2011). 21St Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th
century trade rules. 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th
century trade rules. World Trade Organization. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201108_e.pdf
9
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
the US-China trade war. However, delegates are expected to expand their
scope of analysis, to understand and evaluate these issues not just in the
context of the US-China trade war, but also in relation to American-
foreign trade relations/disputes. To note, this topic tasks delegates to
consider the underlying issues that led to the trade war – that is, what
are the merits to the American argument, are the Chinese pre-trade war
policies justified, and what are the steps the WTO and its members can
and should take to address these underlying issues?
Definitions
Trade War
A trade war is broadly defined as a large and sudden increase in tariffs
charged on imported goods, followed by a subsequent tit-for-tat retaliatory
tariff raises. As Goldman Sachs points out, a trade war is difficult to
empirically define as tariff increases themselves do not constitute as a trade
war, particularly if they are done in small but steady increments or are
following WTO-sanctioned responses. 3 The significance of a trade war in
this topic would be its definition and its resolution – delegates need to
consider how can the WTO serve as a means to resolve the trade dispute?
Tariffs
Broadly speaking, tariffs refer to “customs duties on merchandise
imports,” which “gives give a price advantage to locally-produced goods
over similar goods which are imported.” 4 While at the Uruguay Round of
negotiations, member-states of the WTO have committed to cut tariffs
and set their tariff rates at levels that are difficult to raise according to
the “goods schedules that are part of the Uruguay Round” of negotiations,
3 Mandel, B., & Anderson, H. (2018, July 31). What is a trade war, and are we in one? Retrieved
October 31, 2019, from https://am.jpmorgan.com/fi/institutional/library/what-is-a-trade-war.
4 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Tariffs. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tariffs_e/tariffs_e.htm.
10
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
5 there are no legally binding agreement within the WTO to limit and/or
cut tariffs.6 Most tariff limits are negotiated on a state-to-state level.
Delegates should consider what are the measures to be taken to ensure
states follow through on their Uruguay round commitments? What are
possible changes to the WTO rules to ensure legally-binding agreements
on tariff reductions can be conducted through the WTO?
Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade (NTB)
Non-tariff barriers to trade are wide-ranging set of policies designed
to prevent or limit the import or export of goods without the use of tariffs.
Measures considered a part of NTBs include import quotas, subsidies,
custom procedures, import licensing, rules of origin, and other legal or
administrative processes that poses an obstacle to the free flow of goods
and services. 7 There are three broad types of NTBs: protectionist
measures, assistance measures, and non-protectionist measures. The
latter refers mostly to NTBs that concern health and safety of citizens and
environment. Protectionist NTBs include import quotas, procurement laws,
and anti-dumping laws, which places foreign firms at a distinct
disadvantage. Assistance NTBs include subsidies that encompass various
sectors, and industry bailouts. The potency of NTBs is highlighted through
the Chinese practice of joint ventures, whereby for foreign firms to operate
in China, it must engage in a joint venture with a Chinese firm through
which foreign technology must be transferred to the local Chinese firm.8
Delegates are expected to find ways to reduce NTBs, ameliorate disputes
over what counts as protectionist NTBs (rather than non-protectionist
NTBs) and measures in which the WTO can reduce and limit NTBs.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Understanding the WTO - Non-tariff barriers: red tape, etc.
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm9_e.htm. 8 Wernau, J. (2019, May 20). Forced Tech Transfers Are on the Rise in China, European Firms Say.
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/forced-tech-transfers-are-on-the-rise-
in-china-european-firms-say-11558344240.
11
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Currency Manipulation
Currency manipulation refers to the act of governments purchasing
or selling foreign reserves on the foreign exchange (Forex) market with the
goal of altering the exchange rate of a currency away from its equilibrium
value. Currency manipulation plays into trade disputes primarily when a
nation “devalues” its currency by purchasing additional foreign currency
reserves; whereby higher supply leads to a depreciation in currency X. A
depreciated, or weaker, currency X would enable country X’s exports to be
more competitive, as its exported goods, priced in currency X, are ‘cheaper’
relative to other sources. Delegates should note that currency manipulation
can also be indirect (i.e. the central bank can set the daily exchange rate
of their currency within a certain band to limit fluctuations) and can also
entail artificial appreciation, often done by to ensure currency stability.
However, the importance of currency manipulation in this topic would be
for delegates to determine how currency manipulators are designated (as
exceedingly few nations fit the US Treasury’s currency manipulation
criteria); what counts as currency manipulation (as we understand it – a
negative phenomenon); and finally, how the WTO can reduce both the need
for/act of currency manipulation.
Trade Deficit (Trade Balance)
Balance of trade refers to an economic measure where the monetary
value of trade exports is subtracted by the monetary value of trade imports.
Balance of trade reveals whether an economy is importing or exporting
more: if the balance of trade is positive, this indicates that the monetary
value of trade exports exceeds that of trade imports, and vice versa. When a
nation runs a trade deficit, this indicates that there is a net outflow of its
currency (to pay foreign firms for their imported goods.) Trade imbalances
are not necessarily negative, as a trade deficit could indicate a growing
12
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
economy i.e. consumers have more income to buy foreign goods. 9
However, concerns regarding trade deficits are centred around its causes
and implications: could trade deficits be a result of unfair trade practices
carried out by its trading partners? Do cheaper imports affect domestic
industries? Delegates are encouraged to focus on causes and implications
of trade imbalances, and how IFIs can address these imbalances.
Special and Differential Treatment
Special and differential treatment (SDTs) refer to provisions in the
WTO agreements that give developing nations special privileges and more
favorable treatment relative to other WTO members. 10 In the Doha
Declaration, SDTs for developing nations included “longer time periods for
implementing Agreements and commitments… provisions requiring all WTO
members to safeguard the trade interests of developing countries…” 11 The
debate for delegates to consider is whether existing SDTs go far enough to
ensure developing nations are ‘catching-up’ to developed nations’ economic
standards, but also conversely, how can the WTO be reformed to ensure
that developed nations are substantively implementing SDTs? Delegates
should consider whether SDTs are beneficial for negotiating multilateral
agreements – as the existence of SDTs may disincentivize developed
nations from agreeing to commitments made on an equitable basis, citing
unfairness in obligation distribution.
Developed v. Developing Nations
Developed and developing nations refer to a categorization of a
country’s economic development status, and such designation affects its
9 McBride, J., & Chatzky, A. (2019, March 8). The U.S. Trade Deficit: How Much Does It Matter?
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-trade-deficit-how-much-does-
it-matter.
10 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Special and differential treatment provisions. Retrieved October
31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/dev_special_differential_provisions_e.htm. 11 Ibid.
13
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
rights, privileges, and obligations. Currently, there are no WTO definitions
on the benchmarks that define a developed or developing nations; instead,
under the WTO system, states themselves declare whether they are
developed or developing.12 For the purposes of this topic, delegates should
consider these terms in relation to what are possible metrics to define
developed or developing nations; and in absence of that, what mechanisms
can the WTO develop and use to ensure that developing nation status is
not being abused.
Timeline of Events
October 1947 – General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT): In
absence of other multilateral trade agreements, GATT represented the only
international agreement/system that governs global trade
1986-1993 – Uruguay Round: negotiators from GATT members formed
the WTO and added 123 countries as additional members. The Uruguay
Round focused on reducing agricultural subsidies, lifting restrictions on
foreign investments, opening previously closed market sectors such as
banking and insurance, and increase protection for intellectual property.
Allegations that the Uruguay Round focused excessively on increasing
membership and neglecting the needs of developing member-nations exist.
1992 – US-China Memorandum of Understanding on Intellectual
Property: the US-China MoU on IP protection was then hailed as one of
the most significant agreements as it placed more stringent commitments
on China to protect US intellectual property. However, the 1992 MoU failed
to address its implementation mechanisms. Though China’s trademark,
patent, and copyright laws offer nominal legal protection for IPs, its actual
implementation is questionable, as evident with the lack of registration
processes and education on what constitutes as IP theft, as well as notable
12 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Who are the developing countries in the WTO? Retrieved
October 31, 2019, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/d1who_e.htm.
14
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
cases of counterfeit goods on e-commerce platforms and search engines
such as Taobao and Baidu, which have links to the Chinese government.13
This IP issue sown the seeds of the recent US-China trade war.
1995 – WTO formed through the ratification of Marrakesh
Agreement: the WTO replaces the GATT. The Marrakesh Agreement and
WTO’s formation are notable in that it: 1, is an integrated, indivisible whole,
i.e. one cannot be a party to an agreement without being party to all
agreements; 2, supplemented the GATT with additional articles concerning
technical barriers to entry and intellectual property protection; 3,
negotiated legally-binding dispute settlement mechanisms.14
2001 – China joins the WTO: China’s entry to the WTO was a negotiated
process, one that challenged US and global political considerations and
Chinese ideological orientation (i.e. majority of Chinese economic sectors
are heavily influenced by the government.) The US initially denied Chinese
membership due to the Jackson-Vanik amendment, which conditioned US
trade with China on certain human rights metrics that China failed to meet.
China’s entry was only approved after the US Congress renewed China’s
most-favored-nation (MFN) status contingent on human rights
improvements, as well as China accepting harsher conditions than other
developing nations, including greater liberalization of its economy and more
stringent commitments to intellectual property protection. However,
questions remain whether these harsher commitments are actually being
met in practice in China.
2001-2008 – Doha Round: The Doha Round is the current round of
negotiations for the WTO. The original agenda for the Doha Round included
emphasizing on the needs of developing nations, reducing agricultural
subsidies, enhancing intellectual property protection (under TRIPS),
13 Reuters. (2018, January 12). U.S. Puts Alibaba's Taobao on Blacklist for Counterfeit Products-
Again. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://fortune.com/2018/01/12/alibaba-taobao-blacklist-counterfeit-products/.
14 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Marrakesh Declaration of 15 April 1994. Retrieved October 31,
2019, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/marrakesh_decl_e.htm.
15
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
opening of agricultural and manufacturing sectors, access to patented
medicines, and the future of SDTs. The suspended Doha Round
negotiations reflect the Global North-South divide on critical issues such as
agricultural subsidies and market access and the issue of equity and
feasibility of implementing the SDTs in full. 15
2018-ongoing – President Trump levies higher tariffs on imports:
President Trump levied 10-25% tariffs on steel, aluminum and other
products on nations such as Mexico, Canada, the EU, and China, sparking
retaliatory tariff raises. President Trump increased agricultural subsidies to
American farmers – a source of pre-existing contention. Though American
tariffs on Canada, Mexico, the EU and other countries have ended following
agreements to renegotiate existing trade agreements, the Trump
Administration enacted a tit-for-tat tariff increase with China, sparking a
trade war amidst Trump’s allegations of China’s ‘unfair trade practices.’
2018-ongoing – US-China trade war: Following the initial 25% tariffs
on steel, the US and China engaged in a tit-for-tat tariff increases, covering
items from soybeans to shoes. Of note, China’s tariff increases have all
been reciprocal to the US’, both in tariff rates and volume of trade covered.
Negotiations have largely stalled as meetings have not produced
substantive agreements. The US accuses China of ‘unfair trade practices’
including IP theft, non-tariff barriers to entry, and currency manipulation.
Delegates should examine its underlying causes to find solutions to reform
the existing trade regime.
Discussion of the problem
Country to country disputes: trade and economic practices, currency
manipulation and sovereignty?
15 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). The Doha Round. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/dda_e.htm.
16
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Though trade disputes came to a head with the US-China trade war,
these issues are far more entrenched and systemic than otherwise thought.
These issues can be categorized into three separate, but intertwined points:
trade and economic practices, currency manipulation, and sovereignty.
Regarding trade and economic practices, certain policies such as the
Chinese model of joint ventures for foreign firms to obtain a license to
operate in China is seen as a mask for forcing foreign firms to transfer its
technological innovations to Chinese firms. Conversely, critics can claim
that the US’ use of quantitative easing (QE) policies have resulted in
‘competitive devaluation’ of the US dollar: US QE policies resulted in
interest rate decreases, which prompted capital flight from the US into
other nations – an act that drove exchange rates of foreign currency up
relative to the US and creating a devalued US dollar without direct currency
interference from the US Fed. 16 A similar complaint can be made from the
Western perspective regarding China’s continued practice of state-owned
enterprises (SOEs) or other nominally private industries that receive
extensive state support (i.e. Tencent, Huawei etc.) – such practice, while
part of China’s economic model, creates an unfair competition environment
that disadvantages foreign firms given information and power asymmetry
which are skewed in favour of Chinese firms. 17 However, delegates must
be aware that resolutions to these issues would involve reforms and
changes that often-times strike at the heart of a nation’s economic model
and have widespread political ramifications.
Regarding national economic models and policies, currency policy is
another source of inter-national trade dispute – the most notable case
16 Lau, L. J. (2019, August 21). Currency manipulation? The US may have more to answer for than
China. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3023593/currency-manipulation-us-may-have-more-
answer-china.
17 Cook, S. (2019, March 28). Worried about Huawei? Take a closer look at Tencent. Retrieved
October 31, 2019, from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/03/28/commentary/world-
commentary/worried-huawei-take-closer-look-tencent/#.XbojNEX7SA0.
17
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
being the US designating China as a currency manipulator. However, the
practice of currency devaluation to increase exports is widespread and
often-times unchallenged. For instance, under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe,
Japan’s central bank have purchased foreign bonds and debt to devalue the
Japanese Yen, which made its foreign exports more competitive. 18 Despite
the fact that Japan doesn’t directly set exchange rates like China does, the
argument that Japan is artificially devaluing its currency to grant an unfair
advantage to Japanese exports can still be made. However, at the crux of
all of these subtopics is the notion of sovereignty. Delegates must consider
how the WTO can address these specific subtopics in inter-state disputes.
Moreover, delegates must analyse how potential reforms to the
international trade regime can be implemented and its practical feasibility
in national ratification processes, particularly when these changes may
challenge sovereign prerogatives in setting out economic and trade policies.
Structural Issues within the WTO?
Some of the WTO’s structural issues came to light in the recent Doha
Round. WTO, like many other IFIs, have often been accused of having a
deliberation, negotiations, and implementation structure that privileges the
developed economies. For instance, while the Doha Declaration contains
SDTs that ostensibly supports developing economies in harmonizing their
trade practices with WTO standards at a slower pace, WTO-sanctioned anti-
dumping legislations (a NTB) have prevented this from taking place.
Though dumping as a pricing strategy focuses on using below-market value
prices to ‘injure’ domestic firms to establish a monopoly, in some cases it
is difficult to ascertain whether the pricing strategy of a foreign import is of
‘fair market value.’ For instance, goods from China facing allegations of
18 Jennings, R. (2017, March 10). It's Not Quite China, But Japan Is Controlling Currency Prices To
Help Exporters. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2017/03/09/a-case-for-japan-as-asias-other-big-currency-
manipulator/.
18
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
‘dumping’ are not assessed using its market value in Chinese markets, but
rather the US uses ‘analogous pricing’ by comparing the imported price with
its hypothetical price in an ‘analogous’ market to China.19 The issue is that
it doesn’t take into consideration the low production costs of Chinese goods,
instead, Western standards are used to judge whether imports from the
developing world are considered priced at ‘dumping’ levels, and these
Western standards subsequently permit countervailing tariffs on these
nations accused of dumping. 20 The lack of clarity around the timeframe of
SDTs has allowed, in certain cases, WTO-sanctioned countervailing policies
against developing economies to compel trade/market liberalization – an
act that runs contrary to the spirit of the Doha Declaration and SDTs.
On a similar note, the WTO’s focus on reducing and eliminating
agricultural subsidies has been met with uneven implementation. In the
negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement (TPP,) the US
focused the removal of existing tariffs on American agricultural goods by
TPP members and the reduction of TPP members’ subsidies to local
agricultural producers, citing subsidies as a NTB – however, throughout the
TPP and other related negotiations, the US refused to reduce/eliminate its
agricultural subsidies. US NTBs that grant US exports an advantage have
not faced much scrutiny by the WTO, while developing countries’ alleged
NTBs have been closely examined. These few examples indicate a greater
structural issue and question WTO impartiality and whether its structures
are implicitly biased. 21
19 Johnson, B. (1992, July 21). A Guide to Antidumping Laws: America's Unfair Trade Practice. Retrieved
October 31, 2019, from https://www.heritage.org/trade/report/guide-antidumping-laws-americas-unfair-trade-
practice.
20 Bhagwati, J. (2005). Reshaping the WTO. Far Eastern Economic Review, 168(2), 25–30. doi:
https://doi.org/10.7916/D8XK8N79
21Khor, M. (2000, January 28). Rethinking Liberalisation and Reshaping the WTO. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Rethinking_Liberalisation_and_Reshaping_the_WT.htm.
19
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Role of the WTO in dispute settlement and global economy
The final consideration for delegates concerns a macro and systemic
perspective: WTO’s role in dispute settlement. Dispute settlement in the
WTO is done through the Dispute Settlement Board (DSB) of the WTO. In
the existing model, the DSB process begins with consultation of involved
parties, with the DSB only convening for a report when consultation fails.
However, under the WTO’s Articles, a DSB’s final report must be
unconditionally accepted by the parties, though parties are permitted to
challenge the ruling and/or a reasonable period to implement DSB reports.
The WTO’s DSB also allows for parties to ‘retaliate’ against one another
should implementation of the DSB’s report by a member be incomplete. 22
Two points are key here: 1, the majority of cases have been won by
developed nations (the US primarily); and 2, such model of dispute
settlement have been reproduced, albeit without similar levels of oversight,
transparency, and leniency as the WTO, in multilateral trade agreements.
Regarding the latter, investor-state dispute settlements (ISDSs) have
raised the possibility for non-state entities to sue national governments for
alleged infringements of international trade agreements. When considering
this issue, delegates consider what reforms can be done to the international
trade regime to ensure that disputes can be settled without resorting to
retaliatory trade wars, but also in a manner that respect national
sovereignty and differing economic models and priorities.
Bloc Positions
United States
On currency manipulation, the US Treasury has published its criteria
for designating a state as a currency manipulator. Though it has labelled
22 World Trade Organization. (n.d.). WTO Bodies involved in the dispute settlement process.
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c3s1p1_e.htm.
20
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
China as a currency manipulator, the US has historically been rather lenient
on suspected currency manipulators as most of these nations are key US
trading partners or allies. The current US policy on currency manipulation
can be best described as: reducing currency manipulation to levels that
don’t present an unfair advantage to exports coming into US markets. On
tariffs and NTBs, the US has been vocal about trade partners’ use of NTBs
and tariffs, calling them “unfair trade practices.” In a White House
publication, the US highlighted three key practices it deems unfair: 1, high
Chinese tariffs on American goods and NTBs relating to restriction certain
US imports; 2, unfair subsidies, overproduction and subsequent dumping
of Chinese steel, aluminium and other products in the US market; 3,
Chinese NTBs relating to forced technological transfers, corporate
espionage and outright theft of US firms’ IPs. 23 The US’ policies currently
focus on using punitive tariffs to force a trade agreement with China in
which these unfair practices are addressed, as this policy has found success
with South Korea, Mexico, and Canada.
China
The Chinese position on this topic is rather interesting. Though China
itself engages in many policies that violate, or comes close to violating,
WTO Agreements (such as its NTB and currency policies,) in face of the US’
explicit use of tariffs to renegotiate trade agreements, China has taken a
pro-trade position, casting itself as a defender of the existing trade regime.
For instance, leading up to its proposal for WTO reform, Chinese officials
have expressed willingness to abandon its developing nation status in
exchange for genuine commitments to zero tariffs, zero barriers, and zero
subsidies from developed nations.24 At the 2017 Davos World Economic
23 The White House. (2018, May 29). President Donald J. Trump is Confronting China's Unfair Trade
Policies. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-
statements/president-donald-j-trump-confronting-chinas-unfair-trade-policies/.
24 People's Republic of China. (2019, May 13). CHINA'S PROPOSAL ON WTO REFORM. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-
DP.aspx?CatalogueIdList=254127&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0.
21
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Forum, President Xi casted China as the defender of free trade – however,
China’s past record has raised doubts, given China’s well-documented
practices of NTBs, currency intervention, IP theft, and SOEs. 25
Developing Nations
While varying in specific stances, developing nations within the WTO
generally seek a series of reforms to the WTO system whereby SDTs are
implemented fully – particularly since much of the SDTs are undermined
through WTO-sanctioned Western policies forcing premature liberalisation.
Similarly, developing economies seek clarity and actual implementation of
the ‘reasonable timeframe’ clause in the Doha Declaration, whereby
developing economies’ infant industries are allowed to mature prior to
liberalization and facing competition from better organized and at times,
state-subsidized, competitors. Another notable point advanced by
developing nations is the impact of WTO DSB and ISDS mechanisms on
local environmental protection and labour laws, as well as political
sovereignty – to this end, developing nations generally hold policies that
aims to reforming the WTO’s dispute-settlement mechanisms to make it
more accessible, transparent, and impartial.
Conclusion
Reforms to international trade regime are a long time coming – it
represents the accumulation of decades-long disgruntlement between
developed nations, dissatisfaction at a perceived power imbalance between
developed and developing nations, and distrust between trading partners
from discriminatory, yet discrete, NTBs. However, as laid out in the topic
guide, reforming the international trade regime requires examination of a
25 Elliott, L., & Wearden, G. (2017, January 18). Xi Jinping signals China will champion free trade if Trump builds barriers. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/17/china-xi-jinping-china-free-trade-trump-
globalisation-wef-davos.
22
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
whole range of topics, most of which are interlinked and poses a challenging
nexus of economic, political, and legal issues. It is the desire of the chairs
that delegates can avoid the impasse faced by real-life policymakers at the
Doha Round, to examine the root causes of these issues, and negotiate a
diplomatic resolution that reforms the international trade regime to better
suit the changing trade landscape of the 21st century.
Questions a Resolution should answer:
❖ What roles can the WTO play in resolving trade wars or disputes?
How can this role be expanded to preventing trade wars/disputes or
accelerating its resolution, whilst ensuring that the WTO’s expanded
role is acceptable to members?
❖ How can the WTO promote actual implementation of tariff reductions
on an institution-wide level, rather than through bilateral or
multilateral agreements?
❖ What is the WTO’s role in identifying, addressing and reducing NTBs?
❖ What is the WTO’s role in reducing the need for engaging in currency
manipulation? How can the WTO reduce predatory currency
manipulation while preserving national sovereignty and the stability
of the trade system?
❖ What is the WTO’s role in addressing trade disputes that emerge from
trade imbalances? How can the WTO address trade imbalances
amongst its members and its underlying causes?
❖ How can the WTO restructure the SDTs to incentivise developed
nations to agree to future equity-driven agreements, while ensuring
that SDTs are actually fairly implemented to ensure developing
economies’ growth, and that SDTs are not being abused?
❖ How can the WTO better designate developed and developing
nations? How can the WTO ensure that these designations are fair
and not being exploited for special privileges?
23
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Further Reading
• The following sources detail the criteria in which the US Treasury
designates currency manipulators and may be of interest to delegates considering how stringent these criteria are and how few times the label of currency manipulator has been assigned to
trading partners. Full text: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/100/hr4848/text and more specifically: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-
center/international/exchange-rate-policies/Documents/authorizing-statute.pdf
● Though from a pro-trade, conservative think tank, this report offers
delegates an in-depth look into how the US government evaluates trade practices for dumping and suggest areas in which US practices fall short of promoting free and fair trade. This is a valuable source
for both the US delegates, as well as foreign representatives as it offers areas in which potential compromises can be explored. https://www.heritage.org/trade/report/guide-antidumping-laws-americas-unfair-trade-
practice
● The 2018 US Trade Representative Report on China’s compliance with the WTO rules may be of interest to delegates as it focuses extensively on China’s NTBs practices and strikes a rather impartial
tone. This is helpful for delegates to understand the exact practices used by China (in absence of a credible Chinese source) and the reasoning behind the US’ opposition (the document does go into
brief detail about why China engages in some of the NTBs.) https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2018-USTR-Report-to-Congress-on-China%27s-
WTO-Compliance.pdf
● Though not fully covered in the Study Guide, Richard Baldwin’s work on the “trade-investment-services” nexus should be of interest to delegates for greater understanding of why these issues and
reforms are so difficult to achieve. Broadly speaking, Baldwin’s work details how the trade relations and network of the 21st century differs from the way we conceive it, particularly around how capital
account liberalization contributed to the geographic fragmentation of production chains. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201108_e.pdf
● The East Asian Miracle, often held up by the IMF and WTO as successes of its free trade, trade/market liberalization model, can be interpreted as more a result of selective and extensive
interventionist and protectionist policies. This source offers a good comprehensive guide to the policies undertaken by the East Asian governments.
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/975081468244550798/pdf/multi-page.pdf
24
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
● These two following sources highlight the arguments for infant
industry protection, both from an empirical, economic perspective, and from a moral perspective. Delegates would get a better understanding of the arguments advanced by developing nations
after pursuing these two sources: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360081032000047168 and Ha Joon Chang’s “The East Asian Development Experience:
The Miracle, the Crisis and the Future.” ● The following two sources highlight the negative aspects of ISDS
mechanisms, which drew inspiration from the WTO’s DSB. The
study guide was limited in its discussion of the drawbacks of dispute settlement mechanisms, particularly around issues of national sovereignty and environmental/labor protection. These two sources
should give delegates more insight into a vexing problem relating to
an issue that is core in the current international trade regime.
https://www.iisd.org/blog/how-investment-chapter-trans-pacific-partnership-falls-
short and Occidental Petroleum v Ecuador (2012): Observations on
Proportionality, Assessment of Damages and Contributory Fault.
(can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/sit021)
25
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Bibliography
Baldwin, R. (2011). 21St Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century
trade and 20th century trade rules. 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st
century trade and 20th century trade rules. World Trade Organization. Retrieved from
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201108_e.pdf
Bhagwati, J. (2005). Reshaping the WTO. Far Eastern Economic Review, 168(2), 25–
30. doi: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8XK8N79
Cook, S. (2019, March 28). Worried about Huawei? Take a closer look at Tencent.
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/03/28/commentary/world-commentary/worried-
huawei-take-closer-look-tencent/#.XbojNEX7SA0.
Elliott, L., & Wearden, G. (2017, January 18). Xi Jinping signals China will champion
free trade if Trump builds barriers. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/17/china-xi-jinping-china-free-trade-trump-
globalisation-wef-davos.
Jennings, R. (2017, March 10). It's Not Quite China, But Japan Is Controlling
Currency Prices To Help Exporters. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2017/03/09/a-case-for-japan-as-asias-other-big-
currency-manipulator/.
Johnson, B. (1992, July 21). A Guide to Antidumping Laws: America's Unfair Trade
Practice. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.heritage.org/trade/report/guide-
antidumping-laws-americas-unfair-trade-practice.
Khor, M. (2000, January 28). Rethinking Liberalisation and Reshaping the WTO.
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Rethinking_Liberalisation_and_Reshaping_the_WT.h
tm.
Lau, L. J. (2019, August 21). Currency manipulation? The US may have more to
answer for than China. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3023593/currency-manipulation-us-may-
have-more-answer-china.
Mandel, B., & Anderson, H. (2018, July 31). What is a trade war, and are we in one?
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://am.jpmorgan.com/fi/institutional/library/what-is-a-
trade-war.
McBride, J., & Chatzky, A. (2019, March 8). The U.S. Trade Deficit: How Much
Does It Matter? Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-
trade-deficit-how-much-does-it-matter.
People's Republic of China. (2019, May 13). CHINA'S PROPOSAL ON WTO
REFORM. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
26
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-
DP.aspx?CatalogueIdList=254127&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0.
Reuters. (2018, January 12). U.S. Puts Alibaba's Taobao on Blacklist for Counterfeit
Products-Again. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://fortune.com/2018/01/12/alibaba-
taobao-blacklist-counterfeit-products/.
The White House. (2018, May 29). President Donald J. Trump is Confronting China's
Unfair Trade Policies. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-confronting-
chinas-unfair-trade-policies/.
Wernau, J. (2019, May 20). Forced Tech Transfers Are on the Rise in China,
European Firms Say. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/forced-
tech-transfers-are-on-the-rise-in-china-european-firms-say-11558344240.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Tariffs. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tariffs_e/tariffs_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Understanding the WTO - Non-tariff barriers: red
tape, etc. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm9_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Special and differential treatment provisions.
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/dev_special_differential_provisions_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Who are the developing countries in the WTO?
Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/d1who_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Marrakesh Declaration of 15 April 1994. Retrieved
October 31, 2019, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/marrakesh_decl_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). The Doha Round. Retrieved October 31, 2019,
from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/dda_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). WTO Bodies involved in the dispute settlement
process. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c3s1p1_e.htm.
27
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
TOPIC B: Assessing the
Reserve Currency System
28
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Introduction
The globalisation of commerce has been a defining feature of the world
economy since 1945. As ever-increasing amounts of goods, capital and
labour flow across borders, the economic and political infrastructure that
underwrites this trade has grown ever more important.
The holding of foreign currency reserves has helped provide stability to
the international trade and prevent balance-of-payments crises such as
those that wracked Asia in 1997 and the Eurozone periphery in 201026.
“Reserve currency” was synonymous with the US dollar at its inception,
but the reserve currency system of today is also backed by a basket of
currencies around the globe – and the system is sure to change in the
future.
In the course of debating this issue, you will address a number of themes:
the efficacy of the current reserve currency system, the currencies that
make it up, and the role of the IMF in the global monetary infrastructure.
From there, it will be up for you to make collective judgments and
recommendations about what, if anything, had ought to be changed.
Our committee may end up deciding that the system is fine as is. It may
decide it is in need of major reforms. Regardless of what we decide,
though, debate on this topic should help to shed light on an obscure and
poorly understood piece of financial infrastructure that is nonetheless
critical towards the stability of the global economic order.
26 https://www.moneyandbanking.com/commentary/2018/6/24/sudden-stops-a-primer-on-balance-of-payments-
crises
29
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Definitions
Balance of Payments (BoP)
A country’s balance of payments refers to the collective sum of
transactions between a country (individuals, businesses, and the
government) and the rest of the world for a given period.
The BoP is perhaps the key concept in this issue because it provides for a
measure for the demand for a country’s currency outside that country
compared to the country’s demand for foreign currencies.
Fixed and Floating Exchange Rates
Exchange rate regimes vary from currency to currency and country to
country. When exchange rates are fixed, they are tied to another currency
or commodity, such as the US dollar or gold, respectively. When
exchange rates are floating, the value of the currency fluctuates in
response to market forces.
Foreign Currency Reserves:
Foreign currency reserves are the assets held and used by a nation’s
central bank for the purpose of responding to shocks in the BoP or to alter
the valuation of a country’s currency (for instance, propping up the value
of a currency when exports are low and the country is experiencing a
large trade deficit.
Trilemma:
Also known as the impossible trinity, the trilemma describes the trade-
offs that countries are forced to make while formulating monetary policy.
According to the trilemma, countries can only choose two of27:
- Free capital flows in and out of the country
27 https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2016/09/09/what-is-the-impossible-trinity
30
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
- A fixed exchange rate
- Independent monetary policy
In the case of China, for instance, the exchange rate is fixed and
monetary policy is independent, and the trade-off is that capital cannot
flow freely in and out of the country; attempts to loosen capital controls
in 2016 were reversed after markets panicked28.
Timeline of Events
1944 – The Bretton Woods Conference
Delegates from 44 countries come together to create a global monetary
system for the post-war era. They design one that establishes, among
other things, the IMF and World Bank29. They also effectively designate
the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency, the main currency used to
spend and save. The dollar’s value is tied to gold at $35/oz30; other
countries then fix their currency’s values to the dollar.
While the global monetary system was designed in 1944 to allow
currencies to be freely converted at fixed rates, war-torn European
countries were allowed to impose currency controls so as to maintain
reserves of dollars needed to import food, energy, and other necessities31.
These controls were lifted in 1958, marking the official start of the Bretton
Woods System.
1969 – The IMF launches the Special Drawing Right (SDR)
Due to a shortage of gold and dollars to use as foreign exchange
reserves, the IMF creates the SDR as a supplementary foreign reserve
28 Ibid.
29 https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2019/07/30/746337868/75-years-ago-the-u-s-dollar-became-the-worlds-
currency-will-that-last
30 Ibid.
31 https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/bretton_woods_launched
31
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
asset to ensure that the flow of payments and settlement of international
trade is uninterrupted32. The SDR’s value was initially fixed as the gold
equivalent of $1; each country’s allocation of SDRs is determined by that
country’s IMF quota, which is designed to measure the relative position of
the country in the world economy. SDRs can be exchanged for currency
and are the IMF’s unit of account33.
August 1971 – The US ends the convertibility of dollars to gold
As Europe and Japan rebuilt their economies in the 1960s, the American
share of the world economy declined – along with demand for dollars.
Heavy US spending on the military and foreign aid increased the supply of
dollars faster than the supply of gold; eventually, the rest of the world
held more dollars than the US had in gold, threatening the solvency of the
exchange rate system34. Investors and central banks were moving to
convert their dollars into gold the US did not have. In response, President
Nixon ended the convertibility of the dollar to gold and implemented price
controls. While this move temporarily slowed inflation, it marked the
beginning of the end of the Bretton Woods System.
1973 – The Bretton Woods System collapses
In response to the destabilising effect of the “Nixon Shock”, monetary
authorities from developed countries met in an attempt to stabilize the
Bretton Woods System. In response to market pressure, the delegates
reach the 1971 Smithsonian Agreement – a plan to devalue the dollar by
8.5% against gold and 10.7% against foreign currencies, on average35.
However, these efforts merely slowed the unwinding of the system. While
32 https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/08/01/14/51/Special-Drawing-Right-SDR
33 Ibid.
34 https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold_convertibility_ends
35 https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/smithsonian_agreement
32
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
the dollar had been devalued to $38 per ounce of gold, the market price
of gold had risen to $60 an ounce by 1972 and $90 an ounce by 1973.36
Despite the efforts of the delegates that negotiated the devaluation of the
dollar in the Smithsonian Agreement, the system continued to break
down. By 1973, major currencies were freely floated against each other.
Since then, IMF members have been free to choose between fixed or
floating currencies, along with other options such as forming participating
in currency blocs like the Euro37.
1997 – Asian Financial Crisis
East and Southeast Asia is struck by a financial crisis that originates in
Thailand, which had pegged the Thai baht to the US dollar. Thailand had
experienced significant current account deficits which amounted to nearly
8% of GDP by 199638; the government was unable to continue to
maintain the fixed exchange rates due to a lack of currency reserves and
was then forced to unpeg the baht, allowing it to float. The value of the
baht almost immediately dropped 20% relative to the dollar and
continued to fall further39.
The crisis in Thailand sparked a financial contagion that eventually spread
to Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, and elsewhere in the
region. In response, the IMF approved hundreds of billions of dollars in
loans to the affected countries in exchange for structural reforms. While
the crisis was largely resolved by 1999, the Asian economies saw their
currencies significantly devalued and their economies as much as a third
36 Ibid.
37 https://www.imf.org/external/about/histend.htm
38 https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/07/01/what-asia-learned-from-its-financial-crisis-
20-years-ago
39 https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/crash/etc/cron.html
33
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
smaller than they were before the crisis. The overall economic impact of
the crisis was estimated at over $200 billion USD in 1998 alone40.
2016 – Renminbi is added to the IMF currency basket
The value of IMF SDRs was equal to 1 dollar from 1969 to 1981, when the
peg was replaced with a peg based on the dollar, yen, pound, franc, and
German mark. The latter two were replaced with the Euro when it was
launched in 1999. In 2016, the IMF announced that the Chinese yuan
would be added into the currency basket, meaning it had determined that
it was a “freely usable” currency – one that is widely used to pay for
international transactions and is widely traded in currency exchanges41.
Discussion
Role of the dollar in the world economy
While the dollar was only the world’s official reserve currency during the
Bretton Woods era which ended in 1973, it still remains the backbone of
the world’s currency reserves; as of 2018, 62% of all the foreign exchange
reserves in the world were denominated in dollars; in contrast, the Euro
represented 20% of reserves, the pound 5%, and the renminbi 2%42.
Approximately 90% of foreign exchange trades in 2019 involved the dollar
as one of the currencies being traded43.
The widespread denomination of debt in dollars has important implications
for the world economy. For one, it means that inflation and interest rates
for the dollar are much more important outside the US than they would be
otherwise; for instance, rising interest rates in the US will lead to borrowing
costs increasing around the world because of the amount of dollar-
40 https://www.adb.org/publications/key-indicators-developing-asian-and-pacific-countries-2001
41 https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/sdrcb.htm/
42 https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DollarInGlobalFinance.final_.9.20.pdf
43 https://www.thebalance.com/world-currency-3305931
34
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
denominated debt. This can be a major issue for governments that are
deeply indebted; Argentina and Lebanon, for instance, have struggled with
managing their dollar-denominated debt in the face of rising interest rates.
Role of cryptocurrencies as reserves
Debates over the future of the monetary order have been shaken by the
introduction of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and tether, which have the
potential for use as a universal currency independent of central banks or
other governmental authorities. Perhaps the most visible among these is
Facebook’s Libra, which will launch in 2020 and is pegged to a basket of
the US dollar (50%), euro (18%), pound (11%), yen (14%), and Singapore
dollar (7%)44.
While cryptocurrencies are unlikely to be taken on directly as a form of
reserve currency, their adoption could have a number of effects. For one,
their pegging relative to a basket of currencies (or on nothing at all, in the
case of bitcoin) could help shield against the volatility of currency
fluctuations, such as the Brexit-related swings in the value of the pound
since 2016. Further, widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies as a means
of exchange could provide a backdoor route towards de-emphasizing the
importance of the dollar in international commerce; after all, if there people
could buy libra with any of the currencies in its basket, for instance, it would
place less pressure for the eurozone, Japan, Britain, and Singapore to
acquire dollars when they could simply exchange their own currencies for
them. Whether these effects are positive or negative developments is a
matter of perspective.
It should be noted that while cryptocurrency projects as of yet have been
developed independent of central banks, this is not fundamental to the
44 https://www.barrons.com/articles/facebook-libra-currency-will-be-tied-to-the-us-dollar-51569265722
35
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
concept. Bank of England governor Mark Carney, for one, has called for
nations to come together and develop a digital currency that would replace
the dollar in reserves 45 . His justification was that developing such a
currency would free up the trillions of dollars that countries are currently
holding in reserves, reducing the costs of borrowing and encouraging
investment.
Role of cryptocurrencies as reserves
Debates over the future of the monetary order have been shaken by the
introduction of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and tether, which have the
potential for use as a universal currency independent of central banks or
other governmental authorities. Perhaps the most visible among these is
Facebook’s Libra, which will launch in 2020 and is pegged to a basket of
the US dollar (50%), euro (18%), pound (11%), yen (14%), and Singapore
dollar (7%)46.
Bloc Positions
United States
The dominance of the dollar in foreign reserves is reflective of the fact that
the United States is seen as among the safest creditors in the world; the
US government has never defaulted on its debt, save for a few minor
incidents in the 20th century47 and political risks in recent times. Other
contributing factors include the size of the US economy and financial
markets.
The US experiences both costs and benefits as a result of the incumbent
position of the dollar. Because demand for dollars is global, the US
government is able to borrow at much lower interest rates than it would
45 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/aug/23/mark-carney-dollar-dominant-replaced-digital-currency
46 https://www.barrons.com/articles/facebook-libra-currency-will-be-tied-to-the-us-dollar-51569265722
47 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44704.pdf
36
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
otherwise. The fact that there are more dollar-denominated transactions
also means that there is greater liquidity in the financial market, making
asset pricing more accurate and increasing the availability of credit to
American firms.
On the other hand, the US experiences large and persistent trade deficits;
this deficit is exacerbated by the dollar’s role as a reserve currency. This is
because of an inherent tension between American monetary policy’s
impacts at home and abroad, a phenomena known as the Triffin Paradox.
The paradox states that the foreign demand for dollars places pressures on
the US to run a trade deficit so that dollars are flowing to other countries;
this runs counter to the cheap borrowing which is meant to be the key
benefit of having the dollar as a reserve currency48. Further, this is a sort
of sovereignty issue; because American monetary policy has much broader
reverberations than other countries’, the US wields a degree of influence
over those countries’ fiscal positions, particularly those who have pegged
their currency to the dollar.
China and Russia
It should come as no surprise that China and Russia have actively sought
to challenge American hegemony in the monetary space. Both countries
called for the replacement of the dollar as a reserve currency as early as
20094950. China in particular has sought to move aggressively in challenging
the status of the dollar; this may be explained in part by the volume of
trade between China and the US, along with the over $3 trillion USD it holds
in foreign exchange reserves51, significantly more than any other country.
48 https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/1011/how-the-triffin-dilemma-affects-currencies.aspx
49 https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/world/asia/24china.html
50 https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/06/business/global/06ruble.html
51 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-forex-reserves/chinas-august-forex-reserves-rise-to-3-
1072-trillion-idUSKCN1VS02L
37
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Other Countries
While the primary tension in this area is arguably between the US and
China, there are other actors with their own interests. These include the
Eurozone, Britain, and Japan, whose currencies see some use in
international trade, and minor countries whose primary current monetary
concern is maintaining a balance of payments favourable enough to keep a
stock of dollars in reserve.
Conclusion
The reserve currency system is one that doesn’t get much attention until it
has failed in some way; when it does so, the impacts can be profound and
cause great economic, political, and social instability as trade breaks down.
While the topics addressed here are very abstract, their human impact
should not be overlooked. The 1997 Asian Financial Crisis led to a 40%
increase in suicide rates52, and scores more lost their jobs, homes, and
livelihoods. It may be helpful in the course of both research and committee
debate to mete out the impacts that proposed changes will have for all
stakeholders: the global order, nations, businesses, and individuals.
As you go about conducting research on this topic, consider the crises which
have happened in the past and are currently unfolding. Think about what
could have been done to prevent these issues, and where the response to
the crisis in motion fell short. Which of these flaws, if any, were systemic?
And to the extent that they were, what changes can be made to be done
about it?
52 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19200631
38
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
Questions a Resolution should answer:
❖ What role should the IMF play in regulating the reserve currency
system?
❖ Should the current system of reserve currencies be maintained?
❖ Should the composition of the basket of reserve currencies, or the
means by which the basket is determined, be changed?
❖ What role, if any, should cryptocurrencies or other assets play in
forming currency reserves?
Further Reading
● This is a review of a book, Benn Steil’s The Battle of Bretton Woods.
There is no way to link to a book, but reading it is highly
recommended. The book details the deliberations behind the
Bretton Woods Conference and the process which led to the dollar
being adopted as the global reserve (which was by no means
guaranteed).
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2013/03/31/keynes-
white-and-the-battle-of-bretton-woods/#3603afb15e58
● This is a more in-depth overview of the Asian Financial Crisis of
1997, explaining how the crisis unfolded from its foundations to
final resolution. The Crisis is perhaps the most vivid example we
have of the consequences of poor monetary management.
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/asian_financial_crisis
● This is a transcript of Mark Carney’s full remarks at this year’s
Jackson Hole meeting of central bankers which were alluded to
earlier in this guide. It provides a strong overview of the challenges
facing the global monetary order, along with some proposals (note
the biases inherent in them, as Carney serves as the governor of
the Bank of England. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-
39
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
/media/boe/files/speech/2019/the-growing-challenges-for-
monetary-policy-speech-by-mark-carney.pdf
● This is a report from the US Congressional Research Service
providing an in-depth report on the Argentinian financial crisis,
which began in 2017 and is continuing to unfold.
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF10991.pdf
● This is an IMF paper exploring the links between exchange rate
policy and the 2008 financial crisis, identifying some causal links.
https://www.imf.org/external/np/res/seminars/2010/paris/pdf/obstf
eld.pdf
Bibliography
● Amadeo, K. (2019, August 19). Why the US Dollar Is the Global
Currency. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/world-
currency-3305931.
● Asian Development Bank. (2017, November 27). Key Indicators of
Developing Asian and Pacific Countries 2001. Retrieved from
https://www.adb.org/publications/key-indicators-developing-asian-
and-pacific-countries-2001.
● Barboza, D. (2009, March 24). China Urges New Money Reserve to
Replace Dollar. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/world/asia/24china.html.
● Chang, S.-S., Gunnell, D., Sterne, J. A. C., Lu, T.-H., & Cheng, A. T.
A. (2009, April). Was the economic crisis 1997-1998 responsible for
rising suicide rates in East/Southeast Asia? A time-trend analysis for
Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Thailand.
Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19200631.
● Cecchetti, S., & Schoenholtz, K. (2018, June 25). Sudden Stops: A
Primer on Balance-of-Payments Crises. Retrieved from
40
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
https://www.moneyandbanking.com/commentary/2018/6/24/sudde
n-stops-a-primer-on-balance-of-payments-crises.
● China's August forex reserves rise to $3.1072 trillion. (2019,
September 7). Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-
china-economy-forex-reserves/chinas-august-forex-reserves-rise-
to-3-1072-trillion-idUSKCN1VS02L.
● Ghizoni, S. K. (n.d.). Nixon Ends Convertibility of US Dollars to Gold
and Announces Wage/Price Controls. Retrieved from
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold_convertibility_e
nds.
● Hetzel, R. L. (n.d.). Launch of the Bretton Woods System. Retrieved
from
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/bretton_woods_launc
hed.
● Humpage, O. (n.d.). The Smithsonian Agreement. Retrieved from
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/smithsonian_agreem
ent.
● IMF. (n.d.). The end of the Bretton Woods System (1972–81).
Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/about/histend.htm.
● Inman, P. (2019, August 23). Mark Carney: dollar is too dominant
and could be replaced by digital currency. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/aug/23/mark-carney-
dollar-dominant-replaced-digital-currency.
● Kramer, A. E. (2009, June 5). Russian Warns Against Relying on
Dollar. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/06/business/global/06ruble.htm
l.
● Prasad, E. (2019, September 19). Has the dollar lost ground as the
dominant international currency? Retrieved from
https://www.brookings.edu/research/has-the-dollar-lost-ground-as-
the-dominant-international-currency/.
41
Bretton Woods 2020 London International
Model United Nations 2020
● Radcliffe, B. (2019, June 25). How The Triffin Dilemma Affects
Currencies. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/financial-
edge/1011/how-the-triffin-dilemma-affects-currencies.aspx.
● Rosalsky, G. (2019, July 30). 75 Years Ago The U.S. Dollar Became
The World's Currency. Will That Last? Retrieved from
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2019/07/30/746337868/75-
years-ago-the-u-s-dollar-became-the-worlds-currency-will-that-last.
● Special Drawing Right (SDR). (2019, March 8). Retrieved from
https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/08/01/14/5
1/Special-Drawing-Right-SDR.
● The Economist. (2016, September 9). What is the impossible
trinity? Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/the-economist-
explains/2016/09/09/what-is-the-impossible-trinity.
● Timeline Of The Crash | The Crash | FRONTLINE. (n.d.). Retrieved
from
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/crash/etc/cron.ht
ml.
● Walsh, B. (2019, September 23). Facebook's Libra Currency Will Be
Tied, in Part, to the U.S. Dollar. Retrieved from
https://www.barrons.com/articles/facebook-libra-currency-will-be-
tied-to-the-us-dollar-51569265722.
● Walsh, B. (2019, September 23). Facebook's Libra Currency Will Be
Tied, in Part, to the U.S. Dollar. Retrieved from
https://www.barrons.com/articles/facebook-libra-currency-will-be-
tied-to-the-us-dollar-51569265722.
● What Asia learned from its financial crisis 20 years ago. (2017, July
1). Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-
economics/2017/07/01/what-asia-learned-from-its-financial-crisis-
20-years-ago.