Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

35
Incentivise Key Staff- EMI and other options involving share ownership for employees Breakfast Briefings: Winter 2017/18 9 th January 2018

Transcript of Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Page 1: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Incentivise Key Staff- EMI and other options involving share

ownership for employees

Breakfast Briefings: Winter 2017/189th January 2018

Page 3: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

.

Presentations followed by discussion

Presenter Topic

Martin Brown

Tax Director, PKF Francis Clark

Employees and shares – designing a

long term incentive

Giles Dunning

Partner, Stephens Scown

Employees and shares – legal

matters

Richard Wadman

Corporate Finance Director, PKF

Francis Clark

Valuation of minority interests.

Page 4: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Employees and shares – designing a long term incentive

Martin Brown January 2018

Page 5: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Long Term Incentives

And Retention

• Shares can make a great incentive

• Incentive – Employee value directly linked to

shareholder value

• Long Term Retention – Value linked to Exit

• Low cash cost to business – funded by ‘buyer’

• Communication is key

• VALUE = PERCEPTION

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

Page 6: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIP)

• Cash LTIP

• Share Ownership

• Deferred purchase

• Growth shares

• Share Options

• EMI plans

• CSOP

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

Page 7: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Designing a share plan

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

Things to think about

Focus on commercial needs, not the tax wrapper.

• Which employees/directors will participate, will more join in

the future?

• What is within their influence?

• What does good look like for the company/the individual?

• What are the shareholders trying to achieve in the long

term?

• What are your KPIs?

• Will the plan deliver a meaningful value of reward?

• How will the participant realise value from the award?

Page 8: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Tax

• It is EXCITING (honest)!!

• Right = 10%

• Wrong = 60.8%

(Very Wrong = Over 100%)

OK Maybe not exciting: but expensive and

complex

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

Page 9: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Employees and Shares – Legal Matters

Giles Dunning, Partner

Stephens Scown LLP

Page 10: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Direct Employee Share Ownership

Key legal aspects:

• Immediate dilution of existing Shareholders

• Leaver provisions - Good Leaver

- Bad Leaver

• Facilitating an exit

• Tax advice needed – usually an immediate tax charge.

Page 11: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Dilution of Existing Shareholders

Example: Fred owns 100 Ordinary Shares of £1.00 each in

Quidditch Supplies Ltd (QSL). QSL issues 10 new Ordinary

Shares of £1.00 each to its Sales Director, George. Fred now

owns just under 91% of the Ordinary Shares of QSL and George

owns just over 9% of the Ordinary Shares.

Page 12: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Effects of Dilution – Voting Rights

In a Shareholder meeting both Fred and George would have 1

vote each on a show of hands. On a poll vote or written

resolution each share would carry one vote so Fred could cast

>90% of the votes.

Ordinary Resolution – Requires more than 50% of the votes

cast on a show of hands, poll vote or written resolution.

Special Resolution – Requires 75% of votes cast.

Conclusion – Fred has “control” and could remove George as a

director in a general meeting.

Page 13: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Effects of Dilution – Income Rights

• QSL wishes to declare a final dividend of £250 per Ordinary

Share (requiring an ordinary resolution)

• Fred would be entitled to a dividend payment of £25,000

• George would be entitled to a dividend payment of £2,500

• QSC’s retained distributable profit is reduced by £27,500.

Page 14: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Effects of Dilution – Capital Rights

• QSL is valued at £1m.

• The net proceeds after deducting the estimated costs of a

sale would be £925k.

• Fred would be entitled to circa £841,750 of the net proceeds.

• George would be entitled to the balance of the net proceeds -

£83,250.

• Fred’s ultimate share in the “equity” would be diluted by

£83,250.

Page 15: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Employee Departure

• Example: George receives an offer from Bludgers (South

West) Ltd, a key competitor. He decides to leave but wishes

to retain his shares in QSL.

• What can QSL do about this?

Page 16: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Leaver Provisions

• There are no provisions in the Companies Act 2006 or the

Model Articles requiring an employee to surrender their

shares on cessation of employment.

• Fortunately, Fred instructed his solicitor to amend the articles

of association of QSL prior to issuing shares to George.

• On reviewing the updated articles Fred finds a “compulsory

transfer” provision requiring a departing employee to offer

their shares back to the other Shareholders.

Page 17: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Good Leaver vs. Bad Leaver

• George accepts he is bound by the leaver provisions but

values his Shares at ‘at least £100k’.

• Fred consults the articles which include valuation

mechanisms for a “good leaver” and a “bad leaver”.

• A good leaver is entitled to receive a pro rata share of the

market value of the Company without discount for minority

interest.

• A bad leaver is only entitled to the par value of their shares

i.e. £1 per share.

Page 18: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Good Leaver vs. Bad Leaver

• A good leaver is defined as an employee who leaves by

reason of death, critical illness or ‘retirement’.

• A bad leaver is defined as a departing employee who is not a

good leaver.

• George changes his mind about leaving.

Page 19: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Facilitating an Exit

• Fred and George receive an offer from Nimbus 2000 Ltd of

£850,000 for the entire share capital of QSL.

• Fred wishes to accept the offer but George refuses as its

lower than the previous valuation of QSL. Nimbus threatens

to withdraw the offer if they can’t acquire 100% of QSL.

• Fred recalls his solicitor talking about drag and tag articles

being useful if he wishes to sell and consults to the articles

again….

Page 20: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Facilitating on Exit

• The articles contain a drag along clause stating that if the

holders of over 50% of the shares of QSL wish to sell, they

can compel the other Shareholders to join in the sale at the

same price per share.

• Confronted with the articles, George changes his mind and

agrees to sell.

Page 21: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Employee Share Options

• A legal right to acquire shares in the future at a set price

• Future dilution of existing Shareholders

• Vesting / exercise conditions

• Timing of exercise (exit only?)

• Tax advice needed – usually tax charge arises on exercise

• Consider whether the company can grant EMI options to

receive more favourable tax treatment.

Page 22: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Vesting / Exercise Conditions

• Time based vesting

• Performance based voting

• Time and performance based voting

• Keep it simple, objective and achievable.

Page 23: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Timing of Exercise / Exit Only Options

• Employee share ownership / dilution only occurs when

options are exercised.

• Exercise can take place immediately before an exit mitigating

risks of dilution (Exit Only).

• Share option rules can allow for cashless exercise of exit only

options allowing exercise price to be paid out of sale

proceeds.

Page 24: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Timing of Exercise / Exit Only Options

• Exercise notice (if executed as a deed) can appoint majority

Shareholder as attorney of the option holders to execute sale

documentation on their behalf.

• If share options can be exercised before an exit consider

direct share ownership protections as per above slides.

Page 25: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

The information in this presentation is intended to be general information onlyand should not be interpreted as legal advice. English law is subject to changeso whilst Stephens Scown LLP seeks to ensure the information contained in thispresentation is up to date and accurate, the law can change quickly and noguarantee is made as to its accuracy which means the information should notbe relied upon. Presentation slides should not be viewed as an alternative toprofessional advice and Stephens Scown LLP does not accept liability for anyaction taken or not taken as a result of this information.

Disclaimer

Page 26: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Valuation of Minority Interests

Richard Wadman January 2018

Page 27: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Introduction

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

• Valuation of shares in unquoted companies is not an exact science

• The only method to confirm any valuation is to complete an open market sales transaction. (*)

• Our indication is therefore purely our opinion on the amount that could be realised by sale of the shares in the current market.

• The appetite of buyers and market conditions change constantly, all of which may influence the value of the shares. (*)

• Others may place a different value on the shares

• Tax• define market value in accordance with s272 of Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act

1992 and associated relevant tax case law.

• (* = value or price?)

Page 28: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Methodologies

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

• See handout in pack

• Company valuations• Discounted Free Cash Flow (Net Present Value)

• Net Asset Value

• Comparable Earnings (to arrive at Enterprise Value, then adjust to Equity Value)

• Minority shareholdings• Discounting future dividend income

• Company valuation, then apply a minority discount to a prorated value

Page 29: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

• Use when/ if:• Historic dividend income stream relevant to a minority shareholder

• Planned dividend income stream

• Calculation, requires assumptions on:• Dividends

• Discount rate

• Period (perpetuity or shorter?)

Discounting future dividend income

Page 30: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

• “The valuation must reflect the extent to which a potentialbuyer of the asset can control, influence and derive enjoymentfrom the asset. Usually, if the degree of control of the asset isless than 100 per cent, then the value of the percentage shareof the asset will be less than a pro-rata proportion of theasset’s total value. In terms of unquoted shares, there aremany degrees of control, usually determined by the votingpower of a particular block of shares. These range from fullcontrol, including power to liquidate the company, to a small ornon-existent influence over the company’s affairs of a minorityshareholding.”

• Published material indicates that for “small minority holdingsthe discount might be up to, say 90% if there is no expectationof return, either in the form of dividends or capital”.

Minority discounts

Page 31: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

• HMRC Share and Asset division guidance:

• …up to, say 90% if there is no expectation of return, either in the form of dividends or capital”.

Minority Discounts

Page 32: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

Valuations: basis used (c 100 valuations; out of 133 logged)

70%

8%

3%

6%

11%2%

Valuation basis

Enterprise Value (Comparableearnings)

NPV

DCF

Dividend yield

NAV

Recent transaction used asbenchmark

Page 33: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Incentivise Key Staff- EMI and other options involving share

ownership for employees

Breakfast Briefings: Winter 2017/18 Wrap up: Richard Wadman, Francis Clark 9th January 2018

Page 34: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

Next…

Q&A and/ or discussion

• With opportunity for Q&A for presenters

• Discussion

Future presentations

• “Tomorrow’s World…” (06/02/18) – invite in pack

• “End of year tax planning ideas” (07/03/18)*

• Finance in Cornwall (18/04/18)

pkf-francisclark.co.uk

Page 35: Breakfast Briefings - January 2018

(c) copyright PKF Francis Clark, 2016

You shall not copy, make available, retransmit, reproduce, sell, disseminate, separate, licence, distribute, store electronically, publish, broadcast or otherwise

circulate either within your business or for public or commercial purposes any of (or any part of) these materials and / or any services provided by PKF Francis

Clark in any format whatsoever unless you have obtained prior written consent from PKF Francis Clark to do so and entered into a licence.

To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law PKF Francis Clark excludes all representations, warranties and conditions (including, without limitation,

the conditions implied by law) in respect of these materials and /or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark.

These materials and /or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark are designed solely for the benefit of delegates of PKF Francis Clark.

The content of these materials and / or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark does not constitute advice and whilst PKF Francis Clark endeavours to

ensure that the materials and / or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark are correct, we do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of the materials

and /or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark; nor do we commit to ensuring that these materials and / or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark

are up-to-date or error or omission-free.

Where indicated, these materials are subject to Crown copyright protection. Re-use of any such Crown copyright-protected material is subject to current law

and related regulations on the re-use of Crown copyright extracts in England and Wales.

These materials and / or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark are subject to our terms and conditions of business as amended from time to time, a

copy of which is available on request.

Our liability is limited and to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law PKF Francis Clark will not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential

loss or damage arising in connection with these materials and / or any services provided by PKF Francis Clark, whether arising in tort, contract, or otherwise,

including, without limitation, any loss of profit, contracts, business, goodwill, data, income or revenue. Please note however, that our liability for fraud, for

death or personal injury caused by our negligence, or for any other liability is not excluded or limited.

PKF Francis Clark is a trading name of Francis Clark LLP. Francis Clark LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered

number OC349116. The registered office is Sigma House, Oak View Close, Edginswell Park, Torquay TQ2 7FF where a list of members is available for

inspection and at www.pkf-francisclark.co.uk. The term ‘Partner’ is used to refer to a member of Francis Clark LLP or to an employee. Registered to carry on

audit work in the UK and Ireland, regulated for a range of investment business activities and licensed to carry out reserved legal activity of non-contentious

probate in England and Wales by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Partners acting as insolvency practitioners are licensed in the

UK by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. A partner appointed as Administrator or Administrative Receiver acts only as agent of the

insolvent entity and without personal liability. Francis Clark LLP is a member firm of the PKF International Limited network of legally independent firms and

does not accept responsibility or liability for the actions or inactions on the part of any other individual member firm or firms.

Disclaimer & copyright

pkf-francisclark.co.uk