BRC Risk Assessment

7/26/2019 BRC Risk Assessment

1/54

BRC Conference Barcelona, October 2015

Safefood 360 provides food safety ana!eentsoft"are for ind#stry leadin! food b#sinessesevery"$ere in t$e "orld

Methods & Models forConducting RiskAssessments Underthe BRC Standard


2/54


WHAT IS RISKASSSSM!T"

%$y is ris& iportant in food safety'


3/54


What is Risk Assessment#RA$" (rocess or tool for identifyin! a $a)ard and

estiatin! t$e ris& presented by t$at $a)ard

%idely #sed in t$e *eld of food safety

+t ay be #antitative or #alitative

-#antitative .1 deat$ per year in !ivenpop#lation fro $a)ard / in prod#ct

-#alitative .i!$ ris&


4/54


What is Risk Assessment#RA$" -#antitative preferred b#t seldo possible at site level

ore often c$aracterised by "$at "e don4t &no" t$an"$at "e do &no"

Str#ct#red approac$

S#pports decision a&in! and reso#rce allocation ris&ana!eent

Contrib#tes to better #nderstandin! of $a)ards and foodsafety

pproac$ adopted internationally e! 78, %O9:rae"or&;


5/54


Risk %rameork


6/54


Ste's of Risk Assessment


7/54


Risk Assessments Used in %oodSafet(

(roliferation of ris& assessents in t$efood sector

CC(


8/54


What is Risk"

(robability > Severity ?Ris&


9/54


RISK ASSSSM!T A!)TH BRC

o" to address re#ireents #nder t$e BRC


10/54


Risk Assessment and the BRC

.=$e BRC li&es ris& assessent@

Ae*nitions in t$e BRC

Ris& =$e li&eli$ood of occ#rrence of $ar fro a

$a)ard Ris& analysis process consistin! of t$ree

coponents ris& assessent, ris& ana!eent andris& co#nication

Ris& assessent =$e identi*cation, eval#ation andestiation of t$e levels of ris& involved in a processto deterine an appropriate control process


11/54


BRC %ood Issue *

Referred to no fe"er t$an D ties in t$eStandard

Re#ired doc#ented ris& assessent E 1F

ties

+plied doc#ent ris& assessent E 20ties

ost refer to (R(4s and ana!eentprocesses


12/54


When does BRC Re+uire RiskAssessment"

Got al"ays clear "$en and "$at is re#ired

pplication of lan!#a!e and terinolo!y not al"aysconsistent

.=$e scope and fre#ency@s$all be establis$ed in relation

to t$e ris&s

.=$e fre#ency of t$ese inspections s$all be based on ris&

.=$e copany s$all #nderta&e a doc#ented ris&assessent

.@dependent on ris& assessent


13/54


When does BRC Re+uires a RiskAssessment"

.@at a predeterined fre#ency, based on ris&assessent

.eliinate potential ris&s to prod#ct safety

.prevent any ris& of prod#ct containation .iniise t$e ris&

.accordin! to ris&

.=$e site s$all carry o#t an assessent .on t$e basis of ris& assessent


14/54


Challenges

%$en is ris& assessent re#ired'

S$o#ld it be doc#ented'

S$o#ld it be str#ct#red'

%$at is t$e diHerence bet"een .=$e Copanys$all #nderta&e a doc#ented ris& assessentand .=$e site s$all carry o#t an assessent'

%$at is t$e diHerence bet"een .eliinate

potential ris&s to prod#ct safety and .prevent anyris& of prod#ct containation


15/54


Re+uired and Im'lied RiskAssessment in the BRC Standard

+nterpretation

=$e standard operates on t"o levels

Re#ired or +plied Re#ired E .=$e Copany s$all #nderta&e

a doc#ented ris& assessent

+plied .@s$all be based on ris&

Seantics'


16/54


Re+uired Risk Assessment , -.areas

!/ R0UIRM!T RISK

ASSSSM!T

R0UIRM!

TS

23 =7 :OOA S:7= (IG CC(J

24*3 I+S= II (O=7G=+I LRAS SSOC+=7A %+= 7C (ROC7SS S=7(, COGA8C= LRA GIS+S GACOGS+A7R G 7S8R7S =O COG=ROI +A7G=+:+7A LRAS COA7/ I+7G=R+8S S=7( 6, (R+GC+(I7 1 Aoc#entedR re#ired24*4- =$e CC( food safety tea s$all cond#ct a $a)ard analysis to identify $a)ards "$ic$ need to be prevented,

eliinated or red#ced to acceptable levels

Aoc#ented

R re#ired54.3 +G=7RGI 8A+=SJ

54.4- =$e scope and fre#ency of t$e a#dits s$all be establis$ed in relation to t$e ris&s Aoc#ented

R re#ired54.4. =$e fre#ency of t$ese inspections s$all be based on ris& 9$y!iene and fabrication; Aoc#ented

R re#ired5464- GM77G= O: S8((I+7RS O: R% =7R+IS GA (CNM+GM

5464-4-

=$e copany s$all #nderta&e a doc#ented ris& assessent of eac$ ra" aterial or !ro#p of ra" aterialsincl#din! pac&a!in! to identify potential ris&s to prod#ct safety, le!ality and #ality

Aoc#entedR re#ired

5464-4

2

=$e approval and onitorin! proced#re s$all be based on ris& Aoc#ented

R re#ire546424

-

=$e copany s$all $ave a doc#ented proced#re for t$e acceptance of ra" aterials and pac&a!in! on

receipt based #pon t$e ris& assessent 9cla#se 3511;

Aoc#ented

R re#ired


17/54


Re+uired Risk Assessment , -.areas!/ R0UIRM!T RISK

ASSSSM!T

R0UIRM!

TS

5464. GM77G= O: O8=SO8RC7A (ROC7SS+GM GA (CN+GM

5464.4

.

=$e copany s$all establis$ inspection and test proced#res for prod#cts "$ere part of t$e processin! or

pac&in! $ave been o#tso#rced, incl#din! vis#al, c$eical andor icrobiolo!ical testin!, dependent on ris&

assessent

Aoc#ented

R re#ired

.423 S7C8R+=

.424- =$e copany s$all #nderta&e a doc#ented assessent of t$e sec#rity arran!eents and potential ris&s to

t$e prod#cts fro any deliberate attept to inPict containation or daa!e reas s$all be assessed

accordin! to ris&Q sensitive or restricted areas s$all be de*ned, clearly ar&ed, onitored and controlled

+denti*ed sec#rity arran!eents to red#ce ris&s s$all be ipleented and revie"ed at least ann#ally

Aoc#ented

R re#ired

.4-73 :OR7+MGEBOA A7=7C=+OG GA R7O


18/54


Re+uired Risk Assessment , -.areas

!/ R0UIRM!T RISK

ASSSSM!T

R0UIRM!

TS

.4-.3 (7S= COG=ROI

.4-.4

2

=$e fre#ency of inspections s$all be deterined by ris& assessent and s$all be doc#ented Aoc#ented

R re#ired6453 GM77G= O: II7RM7GS

64545 doc#ented ris& assessent s$all be carried o#t to identify ro#tes of containation and establis$

doc#ented policies and proced#res for $andlin! ra" aterials, interediate and *nis$ed prod#cts to ens#re

crossEcontaination is avoided

Aoc#ented

R re#ired

64.3

(ROA8C= 8=7G=+C+=, CI+S GA C+G O: C8S=OA

64.42 doc#ented v#lnerability assessent s$all be carried o#t on all food ra" aterials or !ro#ps of ra"

aterials to assess t$e potential ris& of ad#lteration or s#bstit#tion

Aoc#ented

R re#ired


19/54


Im'lied Risk Assessments , 27areas

!/ R0UIRM!T RISKASSSSM!T

R0UIRM!T

S

-4-3 S7G+OR GM77G= CO+=7G= GA COG=+G8I +(RO


20/54


Im'lied Risk Assessments , 27areas

!/ R0UIRM!T RISK

ASSSSM!TR0UIRM!TS

.493 S=:: :C+I+=+7S

.494- Aesi!nated c$an!in! facilities s$all be provided for all personnel, "$et$er staH, visitor or contractor =$ese s$all be sited to allo"

direct access to t$e prod#ction, pac&in! or stora!e areas "it$o#t reco#rse to any e>ternal area %$ere t$is is not possible, a ris&

assessent s$all be carried o#t and proced#res ipleented accordin!ly 9e! t$e provision of cleanin! facilities for foot"ear;

Aoc#ented R

iplied.4-745 7=I A7=7C=ORS GA /ER 7-8+(7G=

etal detector c$ec&in! proced#res s$all be based on !ood practice and s$all as a ini# incl#de t$e follo"in!

T 8se of test pieces incorporatin! a sp$ere of etal of a &no"n diaeter selected on t$e basis of ris& =$e test pieces s$all be ar&ed

"it$ t$e si)e and type of test aterial contained

Aoc#ented R

iplied.4-748 COG=+G7R CI7GI+G7SS MISS URS, CGS GA O=7R R+M+A COG=+G7RS

.4-7484

-

Based on ris& assessent, proced#res s$all be ipleented to iniise forei!nEbody containation ori!inatin! "it$ t$e pac&a!in!

container 9e! ars, cans and ot$er preEfored ri!id containers; =$is ay incl#de t$e #se of covered conveyors, container inversion

and forei!nEbody reoval t$ro#!$ rinsin! "it$ "ater or air ets

Aoc#ented R

iplied

.4--3 O8S7N77(+GM GA M+7G7

=$e fre#ency and et$ods of cleanin! s$all be based on ris&

Aoc#ented R

iplied.4-.3 (7S= COG=ROI

.4-.4: n inEdept$, doc#ented pest control s#rvey s$all be #nderta&en at a fre#ency based on ris&

Aoc#ented R

iplied.4-63 S=ORM7 :C+I+=+7S

.4-64- Aoc#ented proced#res to aintain prod#ct safety and #ality d#rin! stora!e s$all be developed on t$e basis of ris& assessent, Aoc#ented R

iplied64-3 (ROA8C= A7S+MGA7


21/54


Im'lied Risk Assessments , 27areas!/ R0UIRM!T RISK

ASSSSM!T

R0UIRM!

TS

6484- (ROA8C= +GS(7C=+OG GA =7S=+GM

6484-4

-

=$ere s$all be a sc$ed#led pro!rae of testin! coverin! prod#cts and t$e processin! environent, "$ic$

ay incl#de icrobiolo!ical, c$eical, p$ysical and or!anoleptic testin! accordin! to ris& =$e et$ods,

fre#ency and speci*ed liits s$all be doc#ented

Aoc#ented

R iplied

6484-4

5

=$e site s$all ens#re t$at a syste of on!oin! s$elfElife assessent is in place =$is s$all be based on ris&

and s$all incl#de sensory analysis and, as applicable, icrobiolo!ical testin! and relevant c$eical factors

s#c$ as p and a" Records and res#lts fro s$elfElife tests s$all verify t$e s$elfElife period indicated on t$eprod#ct

Aoc#ented

R iplied

84-3 COG=ROI O: O(7R=+OGSJ

84-4. %$ere variation in processin! conditions ay occ#r "it$in e#ipent critical to t$e safety or #ality of

prod#cts, t$e processin! c$aracteristics s$all be validated and veri*ed at a fre#ency based on ris& and

perforance of e#ipent 9e! $eat distrib#tion in retorts, ovens and processin! vesselsQ teperat#re

distrib#tion in free)ers and cold stores;

Aoc#ented

R iplied

84.

CI+BR=+OG GA COG=ROI O: 7S8R+GM GA OG+=OR+GM A7


22/54


HACC; & Ra Materials

odels "ell de*ned

8se a siple atri> odel based onprobability and severity

:oc#s of speci*c $a)ards Biolo!ical,C$eical, ($ysical and ller!ens

:oc#s on speci*c processes, aterials andprod#cts

Based on Code> principles

CC(4s


23/54


/'erational and


24/54


Intrinsic >s Inherited Risk

=raditional R4s and CC( foc#s on a speci*c$a)ard at a speci*c process step

Clear line bet"een $a)ard analysis,c$aracterisation, e>pos#re and ris&

=$e ris& is +ntrinsic

:or (R(4s t$e foc#s is on t$e potential fail#re of t$eactivity based on t$e in$erited ris& identi*ed inCC(

ore a&in to :7 9:ail#re ode 7Hect nalysis; not a tool norally #sed by tec$nical staH in foodind#stry


25/54


I!TRI!SIC ?S I!HRIT)RISK

7>aple E Calibration


26/54


Cooking , cooked meat RT#HACC;$

a)ard 7Coli O15D

(robability 9S#rvival d#e to inade#ateteptie; edi# (robability

Severity i!$ +pact

Ris& Ratin! i!$ Ris&

Control teperat#re and tie, core prod#ct

+n t$is case t$ere is a clear line bet"eena)ard +denti*cation, Ris& ssessent andana!eent


27/54


Cooking , cooked meat RT#;R; , Cali@ration$

Aevice teperat#re probe

(R( calibration

(robability 9of bein! o#t of calibration; edi#

Severity i!$ 9+n$erited fro t$e CC( ris&assessent;

Control fre#ency and scope of calibration

+n t$is case t$e R is based on t$e fail#re and eHect

odel

=$e probability of failed calibration stat#s cobined"it$ t$e in$erent ris& of e>pos#re to t$e cons#er


28/54


RISK ASSSSM!T M/)

Ris& ssessent for GonECC( re#ireents


29/54


!eed for Clear RA Model for!onHACC; Assessments

AiHerent odels re#ired for nonECC( R4s

%or&boo& provided for cond#ctin! R4s on Safefood360 "ebsite

+nternal #ditin!

Calibration

Cleanin!

(est Control

etal Aetection (ac&a!in! aterials


30/54


Construction of RA Models

Step 1 Ae*ne t$e R atri>

Step 2 Ae*ne (robability criteria

Step 3 Ae*ne Severity criteria

Step F Ae*ne O#tcoe and Aecisions Criteria

Step 5 Ae*ne Special (oints of ttention

Step 6 Iist all identi*ed points activities tas&s pro!rasetc

Step D Aescribe eac$ point activity

Step V Aescribe t$e ris&

Step Rate t$e probability and severity to prod#ce ris& ratin!

Step 10 Ae*ne o#tcoes and decisions


31/54


am'le RA for InternalAuditing ;rograms

BRC Cla#se 3F +nternal #dits .=$e scopeand fre#ency of t$e a#dits s$all beestablis$ed in relation to t$e ris&s

+nterpretation a ris& assessent of eac$a#dit pro!ra is re#ired and t$e scopeand fre#ency of a#dits s$all beestablis$ed based on t$is Aoc#entedris& assessent to s#pport a#dit of t$isre#ireent


32/54


am'le RA for InternalAuditing ;rograms

Ris& ssessent odel


33/54


Ste' - )eDne the RA Matri


34/54


Ste' 2 , )eDne ;ro@a@ilit(Criteria


35/54


Ste' 5 )eDne Se>erit( Criteria


36/54


Ste' .E )eDne /utcome and)ecisions Criteria


37/54


Ste' 6E )eDne S'ecial ;oints ofAttention


38/54


Ste' 8E ist all identiDed 'oints Facti>ities F tasks F 'rograms etc4


39/54


Ste' *E )escri@e each acti>it( F Ste'9E )escri@e the risk F Ste' :E Rating


40/54


Ste' -7E )eDne /utcomes anddecisions


41/54


HIT/! %//)S


42/54


Hilton %oods


43/54


BRC Re+uirement Cleaning

F11 .=$e fre#ency and et$ods ofcleanin! s$all be based on ris&

+plied re#ireent to cond#ct a

doc#ented ris& assessent on allcleanin! pro!ras

8ndertoo& a f#ll Ris& ssessent based on

ne" odel


44/54


)eDned the risk assessmentmodel

8sed a siple 3 by 3 atri>


45/54


)eDned 'ro@a@ilit( and se>erit(re+uirements

:or eac$ ratin! t$e c$aracter of t$e ratin!"as de*ned


46/54


)eDned the fre+uenc( and sco'e of >eriDcation

re+uired for HighG Medium and o ratings


47/54


)eDned all 'rogramsG risks andratings

Iisted all cleanin! pro!ras and describedeac$ and t$e associated ris&s

Rated eac$ pro!ra (robability of fail#re to cond#ct cleanin!

correctly

Severity of ipact if fail#re occ#rred


48/54


)eDned all 'rogramsG risks andratings


49/54


)eDned /utcomes


50/54


Summar( of RA

R identi*ed t$at cleanin! pro!ras bet"een species posed t$e !reatestris&

+n partic#lar cleanin! pro!ras on lines and contact s#rfaces bet"eenspecies c$an!e overs

Criteria "as establis$ed for $i!$ ris& pro!ras to incl#de@

Clear and detailed cleanin! proced#res for line c$an!e over bet"een species

#toatic noti*cation of copleted cleanin! to s#pervisors


51/54


)igital Control Record


52/54


/utcome

Str#ct#red approac$ to ris& assessent

Cleanin! activities and pro!ras based on

R Si!ni*cant red#ction in fail#res and reE

cleans

Ai!ital recordin! and ana!eent of t$eprocess


53/54


/;;/RTU!ITIS

BRC and Ris& ssessent


54/54

/''ortunities

(roliferation of odels@ developent ofne" odels

BRC consistency in #se of t$e ter ris&and clarity on "$at is re#ired, "$en, $o"and "$ere

ore !#idance on ris& assessent

BRC Risk Assessment

Documents

Transcript of BRC Risk Assessment