Brand Experience (Acid Test)
-
Upload
jamiebowerman -
Category
Documents
-
view
92 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Brand Experience (Acid Test)
Brand Experience
Jamie BowermanRobert Bau/Serv 724
Identityelements
NameColour
Shape
PatternOther
Typography
Icons/Symbols
Wordmark
Ben and Jerrys
chunk style (top)severence (bottom)
Blue•Green•White
Brand touchpoints
Business Correspondence
Financial communications
Employees Products and services
Physical Spaces
Digital/virtual spacesMarketing communications
Sales material
Physical Space and Employees
Product and Services
Product and Services
Brand Tone
Marketing communications
Brand Communications
Brand Communications
Plain Original
Serious Playful
Ignorant Educated
Insincere Sincere
Brand Expression- Semantic Differentials
A
C
I D
C
Actual Identity Real-Life Brand experience, quality, range, customer service.
Conceived Identity Brand image according tousers and non-users.
Ideal IdentityBrand positioning from experts and analysts.
Desired Identity Brand positioning from management
AC2ID Test
Communicated Identity Brand across multiple touch points.
A Actual Identity
Conceived Identity Brand image according tousers and non-users.
“Ben and Jerry, the only men who understand women”
C Conceived Identity
C Communicated Identity
D Desired Identity
C
D
Ben and Jerry’s Ice Cream takes some hard stances on social issues, it may not be clear to consumers what the issues are or what the stance is, though that to may also be helpful.
C
The entirety of Ben and Jerry’s Mission Statement is not fully translated across its packaging design. This too is debateable as to whether it helps or hurts the desired brand image.
I Ideal Identity
Ben and Jerry’s ice cream has some minor gaps between its desired identiy and its communcated and concevied identity. They are mostly minor in nature and outside of further conveying its desired brand onto its packaging Ben and Jer-ry’s Ideal Identity and Desired Identity are working nicely to achieve the “I love Ben and Jerry’s” effect.
Identityelements
NameColour
Shape
OtherTypography
Icons/Symbols
Wordmark
TOMS
trebuchet font
Blue•Black•White
triangle shape on top of shoe
white flat bottoms
Brand touchpoints
Business Correspondence
Financial communications
Employees Products and services
Physical Spaces
Digital/virtual spacesMarketing communications
Sales material
Physical Spaces
Product and Services
Physical Spaces and Employees
Marketing communications
Brand Tone
Plain Original
Serious Playful
Ignorant Educated
Insincere Sincere
Brand Expression- Semantic Differentials
A
C
I D
C
Actual Identity Real-Life Brand experience, quality, range, customer service.
Conceived Identity Brand image according tousers and non-users.
Ideal IdentityBrand positioning from experts and analysts.
Desired Identity Brand positioning from management
AC2ID Test
Communicated Identity Brand across multiple touch points.
Conceived Identity Brand image according tousers and non-users.
A Actual Identity
C Conceived Identity
C Communicated Identity
D Desired Identity
A
C C
Actual Identity
Conceived Identity Communicated Identity TOMS became a “feel good product”for celebrities.This is great for fashion trends but doesn’t help world poverty or 3rd world countries.
All the “giving” focuses around Blake Mycoskie, “chief shoe-giver”. There isn’t alot of room for the average joe in the BOGO mod-el or re-enforcement of the model beyond P.O.P.
TOMS is using fashion trends to sell products like avator glasses with the BOGO model. Unfortua-natley the effects of the model are not very believeable nor do they enforce brand loyality.
A
C
DDesired Identity
Communicated Identity
Actual Identity
The effects of the BOGO model are not well re-enforced nor are they necessarily believeable. There is no way to gage or track the effects of the BOGO model.
Selling sunglasses seems disingenuous without any explaination of the BOGO model or re-enforcement of its effects with the product.
Selling sunglasses and giving shoes has no direct correlation to the BOGO model.
TOMS doesn’t do a great job of explaining the effects of the BOGO model. There is no way to track the progress of the model, or to feel its effects beyond the point of purchase.
Taking this model to avator glasses only makes the brand seem more disingenuous about giving and more interested in selling you things to feel good about at P.O.P. Other companies use this model as well and the truth is people are mostly buying the product because they like them. Feeling good about the BOGO model is a bonus for the consumer.
IIdeal Identity