BRAC Minutes...20 Dec Process Overview BRAC Report Capacity Responses to JCSGs MV Briefs to ISG...

1Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

BRAC 2005

Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group

January 7, 2005


PurposeProcess Overview

Summary of Conflict Review

Force Structure Plan Status

Candidate Recommendations

Process

H&SA

Wedge Allocation Rules


CY 2003O N D

CY 2004J F M A M J J A S O N D

CY 2005J F M A M

Joint Cross-Service Groups

Military Departments ISG

Rev

iew

IEC

Rev

iew

Coo

rdin

atio

n

Rep

ort W

ritin

g

Finalize Recommendations

Final Selection Criteria

Draft Selection Criteria

Commissioner Nominations

Deadline

Capacity Data Call

Mil Value Data Call

Issued

SecDef Recommendations

to Commission

JCSG Recommendations

Due to ISG20 Dec

Process Overview

BRACReport

Capacity Responses to

JCSGs

MV Briefsto ISG

JPATsCriteria 6-8

Work

BRAC Hearings

Mil Value Responses to

JCSGs

Scenario Development

CapacityAnalysis

Military ValueAnalysis

MilDepsRecommendations

Due20 Jan

Scenario Development

CapacityAnalysis

Military ValueAnalysis

Start Scenario Data Calls

ScenarioDeconfliction

Revised Force Structure Plan

Deadline


New Conflict Review

As of 23 Dec 04 - 946 Registered Scenarios 4 New Conflicting Scenarios

Proposed resolutions for all new conflicts settled presented now for approval

41 Not Ready for Categorization 552 Independent 42 Enabling 150 Deleted

Approve proposed resolutions (Tab 4)

JO TNI

S TAFF

CHIE FS OF

Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes OnlyDo Not Release Under FOIA

7 JAN 24 JAN 4 FEB 18 FEB NLT 15 MAR

ISG ApprovalOf Plan

ServiceUpdates Due

OSDComments Due

JS ProvidesOSD FSP

SecDef SubmitsFSP to Congress

BRAC Force Structure Plan (FSP) UpdateUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Issue: FSP due to Congress NLT 15 Mar 05.

Oct 04 Staffing Services updated Mar 04 plan.

Dec 04 Staffing Services updated Oct 04 submission.

Army: Provided update, no issues.Navy: Will modify Oct 04 submissionUSAF: Will provide missile numbers, no AC/RC breakout beyond 2006.USMC: Provided update, no issues.

1 Non-ConcurPA&E: Submission must comply with Presidential Budget (due to Congress 7

Feb) sufficient fidelity available mid-Jan.

Recommendation: ISG approve following timeline

JO TNI

S TAFF

CHIE FS OF

Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes OnlyDo Not Release Under FOIA

Interim Force Structure Plan (FSP) ReleaseUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Issue: BRAC statute requires MilDeps and JCSGs to produce recommendations compliant with the FSP

Fully staffed FSP not available Additional staffing required to resolve conflicts. Must be based on Presidents Budget (due to Congress 7 Feb)

Recommendation: ISG approve issuing interim FSP for MilDep/JCSG use. ISG direct issuance of final FSP as soon as signed by SecDef.


Candidate Recommendation ProcessCandidate recommendations will be posted to the Portal as received Packages received by noon Friday, will be considered at the next weeks ISG

Following Monday, OSD BRAC Office provides formal read-aheadFollowing Wednesday, DASs discuss the candidate recommendations, isolate issues for the ISGs consideration Following Friday, JCSG Chair or MilDep designee will brief their respective candidate recommendations to ISGPotential ISG actions: approve and prepare for IEC consideration approve but hold for consideration of an enabling scenario; disapprove; note any conflicts that need to be considered and resolved; or hold for more information or a related candidate recommendation.


Candidate RecommendationsHeadquarters & Support Activities

9

Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

HSA JCSG Road Map

Military Personnel Centers

Civilian Personnel Offices

Reserve & Recruiting Commands

Combatant Commands

Correctional Facilities

Major Admin & HQ

Financial Management

Defense Agencies

Geo-clusters & Functional

Major Admin & HQ

Mobilization

Installation Management (12 of 14)

Mobilization

10


Statistics

HSA JCSG Currently has:

188 Ideas

106 Scenarios Declared

25 CandidateRecommendations

178 Proposals

0 Ideas Waiting

0 Proposals Waiting

58 Proposals Deleted

10 Ideas

Deleted

14 Scenarios Deleted

61 ScenariosWaiting

__ ISG Approved &Prep for IEC

__ ISG On Hold for AddlInfo or Related

Candidate Recommendation

__ ISG Approved, but on Hold for Enabling

Scenario

__ ISG Disapproved Note Conflict(s) to be

Considered & Resolved

20 Rejected asCandidate

Recommendations

11


DFAS -- 26 Locations to 3 Locations

Green Retained SitesRed Closed SitesBlack Special Purpose Sites

Oakland

Seaside

San Bernardino

San Diego

Pacific Ford Island

HawaiiJapan

Europe

Denver

Indianapolis

San Antonio

Lawton

Omaha

Kansas City

St. LouisLexington

Dayton

Cleveland

Rome

Limestone

ArlingtonPatuxant River, MD

Norfolk

Charleston

Orlando

Pensacola NAS

Pensacola Saufley Fld

Rock Island

Columbus

Red River TX

Southbridge MACleveland Bratenahl

Mechanicsbug PA

12


Candidate # HSA0018 Defense Finance & Accounting Service (DFAS)

Justification Military Value Supports DFAS Transformation Plan.Mission consolidation - Unit Cost reduction.DFAS out of NCR (399); retains small liaison staff (6).Gaining sites meet DoD AT/FP standards.Maximizes facility/business operation efficiencies, mitigates man-made & natural disasters/challenges.Eliminates excess capacity, Admin 51% or 2.084M GSF and Warehouse 75% or .568M GSF.

Military Value among 30: Denver 3; Columbus 9; Indianapolis 12Prior Avg. MV: = .621; Resultant Avg. MV: = .689Military Judgment and Business Process Review analysis results: optimizes economies of scale/synergistic efficiencies to maximize potential for unit cost reductions and improve service, and minimizes risk of man-made and natural disasters/ challenges.

Payback Impacts

One Time Cost: $293MNet Implementation savings: $134MAnnual Recurring savings: $120MPayback period: ImmediateNPV savings: $1.233B

Criterion 6: -72 to -1888 jobs; less than 0.1% to 1.08%.Criterion 7: No issues. Criterion 8: No issues.Other risks associated with implementation: Workforce, space availability, operating costs.

Candidate Recommendation (Summary): Close 21 DFAS locations by relocating and consolidating all functions to the Defense Supply Center-Columbus, OH, the Buckley AF Base Annex, Denver, CO, or the MG Emmett J. Bean Federal Center, Indianapolis, IN. Realign DFAS Arlington, VA, by relocating/consolidating functions same as above, and retain minimum essential liaison staff. Realign DFAS Cleveland, OH, by relocating/consolidating functions same as above, and retain an enclave for Military Retired and Annuitant Pay Services contract function. Realign DFAS Columbus, OH; Denver, CO, and Indianapolis, IN by relocating portions of the Accounting Operation, Military, and Commercial Pay functions and supporting functions among the three locations to implement strategic redundancy.

Strategy

COBRA

Capacity Analysis / Data Verification

Military Value Analysis / Data Verification

JCSG/MilDep Recommended

Criteria 6-8 Analysis

De-conflicted w/JCSGs

De-conflicted w/MilDeps

13


Military Personnel Centers

Consolidate AF Personnel Functions (Mil & Civ) @ Randolph

HSA-0111GC-MPC-0015

CONCEPT

JOINT SERVICE UNIQUE

MEGA San Antonio(includes MC)

HSA-0002GC-MPC-0001

MEGA Ft Leavenworth(includes MC)

HSA-0005GC-MPC-0010

AIR FORCE NAVY

AF @ Randolph(includes Recruiting)

HSA-0008GC-MPC-0013

NAVY @ Millington(includes Recruiting)

HSA-0007GC-MPC-0012

ARMY HRC @ Knox(includes Recruiting)

HSA-0006GC-MPC-0011

ARMY HRC @ Ft Sam Houston(includes Recruiting)

HSA-0074GC-MPC-0014

ARMY & AF @ RandolphHSA-0004

GC-MPC-0009

OR

OR ARMY

OR

*Partially-Joint Concept*

ORORE

E

Randolph AFB - AF, Navy, MCFt. Sam Houston - Army

E

EE

14


Military Personnel & RecruitingScenario Candidate Strategy

Losing Locations

Army (HSA-0006)HR Command, AlexandriaHR Command, St LouisHR Command, IndianapolisAccessions & Cadet Commands,

Ft Monroe

Navy (HSA-0007)Navy Reserve Personnel &Navy Recruiting, New Orleans

Air Force (HSA-0008)AF Reserve Personnel, BuckleyAF Reserve Recruiting, Robins

Gaining Locations(Current Resident Activity)

USA Recruiting Command, Ft Knox

Navy Personnel &Recruiting,NSA Mid-South(Millington)

AF Personnel & Recruiting,Randolph

15


HSA-0006: Create an Army Human Resources (Personnel & Recruiting) Center of Excellence at Fort Knox

Justification Military Value

Enables mission consolidation of Active & Reserve personnel center functions. Co-location of Recruiting functions improves personnel life-cycle management.Eliminates excess capacity and leased space

Recruiting function: Fort Monroe 100/147; Fort Knox 12/147Military Personnel: Ft Knox was selected because of its high overall military value as the current location of the US Army Recruiting Command, which offers synergies with the military personnel function.

Payback Impacts

One Time Cost: $ 99.0 MNet Implementation Savings: $ 462.5 MAnnual Recurring Savings: $ 145.5 M Payback Period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $ 1.78 B

Criterion 6: DC Area ROI : - 3,734 jobs; 0.1%St Louis ROI: - 4,171 jobs; 0.3%Indianapolis ROI: - 226 jobs; less than 0.1%Norfolk ROI: - 820 jobs; less than 0.1%

Criterion 7: Proximity to Louisville mitigates child care, housing, and medical issues Criterion 8: Overall, no known environmental impediments.Other Risks Associated with Implementation: Skilled civilian workforce availability in concentrated GS-series.

Candidate Recommendation: Close Army Human Resources Command leased facilities in Alexandria, Virginia, Indianapolis, Indiana, and St. Louis, Missouri, relocating and consolidating all functions at Fort Knox, Kentucky. Realign Fort Monroe, Virginia, by relocating Army Accessions Command and Cadet Command to Fort Knox, Kentucky.

StrategyCOBRA

Capacity Analysis / Data VerificationMilitary Value Analysis / Data Verification

JCSG/MilDep RecommendedCriteria 6-8 Analysis

De-conflicted w/JCSGsDe-conflicted w/MilDeps

16


HSA-0007: Create a Navy Human Resources (Personnel & Recruiting) Center of Excellence at Millington

Justification Military Value Enables mission consolidation of Active & Reserve personnel center functions. Improves personnel life-cycle management and eliminates excess capacity.

NSA New Orleans 0.713. NSA Mid-South in Millington 0.729.Military judgment: Co-location of Personnel & Recruiting Commands favored Millington.

Payback ImpactsOne Time Cost: $ 13.7 MNet Implementation Cost: $ 2.2 MAnnual Recurring Savings: $ 6.3 M Payback Period: 2 YearsNPV (savings): $ 57.4 M

Criterion 6: - 771 jobs; 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues Criterion 8: No environmental impediments

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Support Activity New Orleans, Louisiana by relocating the Navy Reserve Personnel Command, Enlisted Placement and Management Center, and the Navy Recruiting Command office to Naval Support Activity Mid-South, Millington, TN. Consolidate the relocating Navy Reserve Personnel Command and the Enlisted Placement and Management Center with the Navy Personnel Command at Naval Support Activity Mid-South, Millington, TN. Consolidate the relocating Navy Recruiting Command office with the Navy Recruiting Command office currently at Naval Support Activity Mid-South, Millington, TN.

StrategyCOBRA


JCSG/Mildep RecommendedCriteria 6-8 Analysis


17


HSA-0008: Create an Air Force Human Resources (Personnel & Recruiting) Center of Excellence at Randolph

Justification Military Value Same transformational strategy for Personnel & Recruiting as applied to the Army & Navy.Enables mission consolidation of Active & Reserve personnel center functions and elimination of excess capacity.Co-location of Recruiting functions improves personnel life-cycle management.

Personnel: Buckley Annex, 0.476; Randolph AFB, 0.723. Recruiting: Military judgment dominated over quantitative scores.

Co-location of Personnel Centers, Recruiting Commands, and Education & Training Command at a single location provides the greatest overall value for the Department.

Payback ImpactsOne Time Cost: $ 32.0 MNet Implementation Cost: $ 31.8 MAnnual Recurring Savings: $ 1.1 MNPV (cost): $ 17.0 MPayback Period: 86 Years

Criterion 6: Denver ROI: - 692 jobs; less than 0.1%Warner Robins ROI: -263 jobs; 0.4%

Criterion 7: Crime Rate at Randolph higher than the national average. No other issues.Criterion 8: Environmental impediments may exist: historic properties, land use constraints, and T/E species.

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Buckley Annex, Denver, Colorado by relocating the Air Reserve Personnel Center to Randolph Air Force Base, Texas and consolidating it with the Air Force Personnel Center at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Realign Robins Air Force Base, Georgia by relocating Air Force Reserve Recruiting Service to Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

StrategyCOBRA


JCSG RecommendedCriteria 6-8 Analysis


18


JB @ Andrews/WashingtonHSA-0012

GC-IM-0004

JB @ Anacostia/Bolling/NRLHSA-0013

GC-IM-0005

JB @ Myer/Henderson HallHSA-0014

GC-IM-0006

JB @ Elmendorf/RichardsonHSA-0015

GC-IM-0007

JB @ Pearl Harbor/HickamHSA-0016

GC-IM-0008

Consolidate Charleston AFB & NWS Charleston

HSA-0032GC-IM-0009

Joint Bases (JB)

Consolidations

Consolidate South Hampton Roads Installations

HSA-0034GC-IM-0012

Consolidate North Hampton Roads Installations

HSA-0033GC-IM-0013

Consolidate Lackland AFB, Ft. Sam Houston, & Randolph AFB

HSA-0017GC-IM-0014

JB @ Monmouth/Earle Colts NeckHSA-0075

GC-IM-0018

Installation Management

JB @ Dix/McGuire/LakehurstHSA-0011

GC-IM-0003

JB @ Bragg/PopeHSA-0009

GC-IM-0001

JB @ Dobbins/AtlantaHSA-0119

GC-IM-0019

JB @ Lewis/McChordLewis executive agent

HSA-0010GC-IM-0002

JB @ GuamHSA-0XXX

GC-IM-00XX

19


IM RECOMMENDATION ASSUMPTIONS

Recommendations are not prescriptive-ICC will establish implementation policyReal Property transfer not impliedBOS functional components not considered absolute-exceptions based on scenario specific situationsRange of projections for personnel reductions developed for each scenario-Low end used in recommendations sent in Scenario Data Call

20


HSA-0011: Establish Joint BaseMcGuire-Dix-Lakehurst

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 262 positions and associated footprint)Establishes first tri-service joint base.Supports complementary missions of McGuire/Dix -mobility/power projection platform.Maximizes joint utilization of infrastructure

Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:

McGuire AFB - .206 Ft Dix - .201NAVAIRENGSTA Lakehurst - .136

Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services

PaybackOne time costs: $11.3MNet Implementation savings: $90.3MAnnual Recurring savings: $22.3MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $290.7M

ImpactsCriterion 6:

Dix ROI: -182 (89 direct/ 93 indirect); less than 01%Lakehurst ROI: -284 (173 direct/111 indirect); less than 0.1%

Criterion 7: No issues regarding community infrastructure

Criterion 8: No known environmental impediments with this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Dix and Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to McGuire AFB, establishing Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization for the new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







21


HSA-0009: Establish Joint Base Bragg-Pope

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancies and creates economies of scalePotential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 84 positions and associated footprint)Supports complementary missions: power projection platform/mobilityMaximizes joint utilization of infrastructure


Ft Bragg - .538Pope AFB - .184


PaybackOne Time Cost: $1.0MNet Implementation savings: $32.8MAnnual Recurring savings: $7.4MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings) $99.1M

ImpactsCriterion 6: -141 jobs (84direct/60 indirect);

Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community

infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with

this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Pope AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Ft. Bragg, establishing Joint Base Bragg-Pope. The U.S. Army will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization for the new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







22


HSA-0015: Establish Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson


Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 224 positions and associated footprint)Supports complementary missions: power projection platform/mobilityMaximizes joint utilization of infrastructure


Elmendorf AFB - .230Ft Richardson - .189


PaybackOne time costs:: $7.7MNet Implementation savings: $78.9MAnnual Recurring savings: $19.0MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $249.5M

ImpactsCriterion 6: -412 jobs (224 direct/188 indirect); -0.16%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community

infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments

with this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Richardson by relocating the installation managementfunctions/responsibilities to Elmendorf AFB, establishing Joint Base Elmendorf/Richardson. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for the new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







23


HSA-0012: Establish Joint Base Andrews-Washington

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 30 positions and associated footprint).Eliminates a base within a base and establishes single installation management responsibility for consolidated footprint


Andrews AFB - .222COMNAVDIST Washington - .342

Military judgment: Transfer of NAF installation management functions to Andrews AFB, will provide greatest overall military value to DoD

PaybackOne time costs: $496KNet Implementation savings: $6.3MAnnual Recurring savings: $1.5MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $19.7M

ImpactsCriterion 6: -30 jobs (18 direct/12 indirect); Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community


this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Air Facility Washington by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Andrews AFB, establishing Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for the new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







24


HSA-0013: Establish Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling-NRL

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 119 positions and associated footprint).Eliminates a base within a base Maximizes joint utilization of infrastructure


NAVDIS Washington (includes Anacostia and NRL). - .342Bolling AFB - .214

Fuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services


ImpactsCriterion 6: -200 jobs (119 direct/81 indirect); Less than

0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community


this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Bolling AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Naval District Washington at the Washington Navy Yard, establishing Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling-Naval Research Laboratory (NRL). The U.S. Navy will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for this new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







25


HSA-0016: Establish Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 277 positions and associated footprint)Maximizes joint utilization of infrastructureMilitary value greater for Naval Station Pearl Harbor based on predominance and facilities efficiencies


NAVSTA Pearl Harbor - .395Hickam AFB - .229



ImpactsCriterion 6: -510 jobs (277 direct/233 indirect);



this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Hickam AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Naval Station Pearl Harbor, establishing Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. The U.S. Navy will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for this new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







26


HSA-0075: Establish Joint Base Monmouth - Earle Colts Neck

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 75 positions and associated footprint)Share military housing.Military value analysis greater for Monmouth based on size and PW efficiencies.


Ft Monmouth - .136WPNSTA Earle - .074



ImpactsCriterion 6: -126 jobs (75 direct/51 indirect)



this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Weapons Station Earle Colts Neck by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Ft. Monmouth and establish Joint Base Monmouth-Earle Colts. The U.S. Army will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for this new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







27


HSA-0010: Establish Joint Base Lewis-McChord


Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale. High potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 432 positions and associated footprint)Supports complementary missions: power projection platform/mobilityMaximizes joint utilization of infrastructure

Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Valuemodel:

Ft Lewis - .355McChord AFB - .208


PaybackOne Time Cost: $6.2MNet Implementation savings: $218.2MAnnual Recurring savings: $46.6MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $634.8M

ImpactsCriterion 6: -776 jobs (422 direct/354 indirect); -.23%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community


this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign McChord AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Ft. Lewis, establishing Joint Base Lewis-McChord. The U.S. Army will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization for the new joint base.

Strategy

COBRA







28


HSA-0032: Consolidate Charleston AFB and NAVWPNSTA Charleston

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 264 positions and associated footprint)Military value analysis marginally higher for Charleston AFB based on larger operational mission


Charleston AFB - .186NAVWPNSTA Charleston - .184



ImpactsCriterion 6: -656 jobs (264 direct/392 indirect); -0.2%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community


this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Weapons Station Charleston by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Charleston AFB, SC. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).

Strategy

COBRA







29


HSA-0017: Consolidate Lackland AFB, Ft Sam Houston and Randolph AFB

Justification Military Value Eliminates redundancy of installation management functions and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 199 positions and associated footprint).Military value analysis greater for Air Force based on predominance and efficiency.Supports complementary missions: training


Lackland AFB - .296Ft Sam Houston - .233Randolph AFB - .205






this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Sam Houston and Randolph AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Lackland AFB. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).

Strategy

COBRA







30


HSA-0034: Consolidate South Hampton Roads Installations

Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 21positions and associated footprint)Ft Storys small size and distance from Ft Eustis makes transfer to Navy ideal candidate for consolidation


Eustis - .247NAVSTA Norfolk .412


PaybackOne time costs: $300KNet Implementation savings: $8.8MAnnual Recurring savings: $2.0MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $26.6M




this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Story by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Commander Naval Mid-Atlantic Region. The U.S. Navy will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Supprt (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).

Strategy

COBRA







31


HSA-0033: Consolidate North Hampton Roads Installations

Justification Military Value Eliminates redundancy of installation management functions and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 217 positions and associated footprint)Military value analysis greater for Langley based on large population associated with operational mission and headquarters


Langley AFB - .249Ft Eustis - .247Ft Monroe - .110



ImpactsCriterion 6: -501 jobs (217 direct/ indirect)



this recommendation

Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Eustis and Ft. Monroe by relocating the installationmanagement functions/responsibilities to Langley AFB. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).

Strategy

COBRA







32


IM Costs & Savings Summary

Scenario Gaining Service

One Time Cost ($M)

NPV Savings ($M)

SteadyState Savings

($M)

Army

Army

Monmouth/Earle Army 1.6 90.7 6.8

Hampton South Navy .3 26.6 2.0

NDW/Bolling Navy 2.9 140.7 10.6

Pearl/Hickam Navy 8.6 374.2 28.2

Andrews/NAF Air Force .5 19.7 1.5

Charleston Air Force 6.6 265.9 21.9

Elmendorf/Richardson Air Force 7.7 249.5 19.0

Hampton North Air Force 8.2 212.0 16.3

McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst Air Force 11.3 290.7 22.3

San Antonio Air Force 6.4 171.7 13.3

99.1

634.8

7.4

46.6

195.92575.6

1.0

6.2

61.3

Bragg/Pope

Lewis/McChord

Total


Wedge Allocation

Objective: Determine process for allocating wedge dollars to recommendations

Two-Step Process Valuation: Value recommendations based on

attributes that reflect DoD priorities Allocation: Allocate funding based on valuation


Valuation

Recommendations assessed against three attributes for wedge allocationWeights for each attribute should convey ISG/IEC prioritiesAttributes: Transformation and/or Jointness Costs and Savings Efficiency


Valuation: Attributes Hierarchy

1. Transformation: Multi-service/Defense Agency consolidations, collocations, and ISG/IEC priorities.

2. Costs and Savings: Fiscal improvements.3. Efficiency: Decreases in DoD footprint.

Is this the right hierarchy?


Transformation: Metrics Hierarchy

1. ISG/IEC priorities2. Consolidations3. Collocations

Multi-service/Defense Agency over Single Service within above hierarchy

Transformation

ISG/IEC priorities Consolidations Collocations

Multi-service/Defense Agency Single Service

Recommendation: Approve hierarchy


Costs and Savings: Metrics Hierarchy

1. Net implementation savings 2. Payback period3. Net Present Value over 20 years

Costs and Savings

Net implementation savings Payback period NPV



Efficiency: Metrics Hierarchy

1. Square footage2. Acres

Efficiency

Square footage Acres



Next Steps

Next ISG meeting 14 Jan 05 (1530-1700)

Continuation of Candidate Recommendations

Next IEC meeting 24 Jan 05 (1645-1730)

INDEX

Tab 1 Candidate Recommendations and Quad Charts

Tab 2 Supporting Documentation (disc 1) Tab 3 - Summary of Scenarios Registered Tab 4 New Conflicts Settled Tab 5 Old Conflicts Settled disc 2 Tab 6 Independent - disc 2 Tab 7 Enabling disc 2 Tab 8 Deleted disc 2 Tab 9 Not ready for Categorization disc 2

1Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA

DRAFT

Scenarios Registered (Scenarios as of 23 Dec 04) DAS review 5 Jan 05)

1501574255641946Total

191224156Technical

21913245Supply & Storage

4244656Medical

34411Intel

1215355112125Industrial

2016287125HQs & Support Activities

72412658Ed & Training

26555490Air Force

811494162Navy & MC

306910118218Army

HoldDis-approved

ApprovedDeletedConflictEnablingIndepen-dent

Not Ready

TotalGroup

Candidate Recommendations


DRAFT

New Conflicts Settled


DRAFT

E&T-0060 - Columbus AFB

Proposed Resolution

n Continue with original scenario (E&T-0060)

Conflicts

n Doctrinal (E&T-0060)USAF objects to the consolidation of maintenance and flight training.

Scenarios Involved

n Establish Joint Strike Fighter Integrated Training Center at Columbus AFB, MS. Consolidate maintenance and flight training. (E&T-0060)


DRAFT

H&SA-0046 & USAF-0057 Offutt AFB

Proposed Resolutionn Continue with original scenarios

(H&SA-0046 & USAF-0057)n H&SA already has a scenario

(H&SA-0045) that uses another location. (H&SA-0046)

n USAF can continue with original scenario but the H&SA functions imbedded therein will be analyzed under the authority and over-watch of the H&SA JCSG.

Conflicts

n Facilities (H&SA-0046 & USAF-0057)

Scenarios Involvedn Consolidate DISA components at

Offutt AFB. Close 5 leased locations, realign 4 leased locations and other sites in the DC area. (H&SA-0046)

n Close Scott AFB and relocate Headquarters Air Mobility Command and US Transportation Command to Offutt AFB. (USAF-0057)


DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093,0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)

Scenarios Involvedn Close 2 United States Army Reserve (USAR) centers

(Middletown and Close the Beaumont, Port Arthur, Port Neches (includes the Port Neches Field Maintenance Site (FMS)), and Orange TXARNG facilities and #2 and #3 Houston USAR centers. Collocate these units in a new AFRC on a site TBD in the Northwest Houston area. (USA-0029)

n Close the Fayetteville, Springdale, Rogers and Bentonville Armories. Close the Pond United States Army Reserve Center. Construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center on a site in NW Arkansas. (USA-0070)

n Close Finnel Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) and co-located Area Maintenance Support Activitiy (AMSA) #154, close 1 Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) facility and build a new facility. Affected units relocate to a new AFRC in Tuscaloosa, AL. (USA-0080)

n Close 2 United States Army Reserve (USAR) centers (Middletown and SGT George D. Libby) and 1 Area Maintenance Support Activity (AMSA 69) and the Connecticut Army National Guard (CTARNG) closes 3 Armories (Putnam, Manchester, and New Brittain) and the Newington VA Facility Lease. All affected units will move to a new 1200 man Tier II, Phase III Inter-Agency Site in Middletown, CT. (USA-0081)

Scenarios Involvedn Realign SOUTHCOM HQ by purchasing SOUTHCOM HQs

leased facility and land in Miami, FL. (H&SA-0101)n Realign JFCOM by purchasing JFCOM leased facility and

land in Suffolk, VA. (H&SA-0126)n Realign NGA functions within NRO facility, Westfields; by

relocating and consolidating to a new facility on commercially purchased real estate adjacent to the current NRO facility at Chantilly/Westfields, VA. (INT 0003)

n Consolidate Missouri based NGA St. Louis, MO, disestablishing all of the NGA functions currently performed in St Louis and consolidating the functions into a new facility on 80 acres at a location to be determined in southwest St. Louis. (INT 0006)

n Consolidate Missouri-Based NGA at Arnold, MO, into a new facility on commercially purchased real estate at Arnold, MO. (INT 0007)

n Close the Jonesboro Armory (includes an Organizational Maintenance Site (OMS)) and the Paragould Armory and the Jonesboro USARC. Construct a new AFRC/OMS in Jonesboro, AR. (USA-0017)

n Close the El Dorado Armory (ARARNG) and the Rufus N. Garrett Jr. El Dorado USARC, collocating the units into a new AFRC in El Dorado, AR. (USA-0019)

n Closes five ARNG armories, and two USAR centers. Realign two units from the MidWest City Readiness Center and construct a new AFRC/OMS in Oklahoma City, OK. (USA-0021)


DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093,0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214Various Locations (Purchased Land)

Scenarios Involvedn Close 1 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armory

and 1 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in Huntsville and move the assigned units to a new facility to be built in Huntsville. Build a 40,800 square foot facility in vicinity of Huntsville, TX. (USA-0101)

n Close 3 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armories (San Marcos, Seguin, New Braunfels) and 1 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in San Marcos and move assigned units to a new facility in San Marcos. (USA-0102)

n Close the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armories, realign the Marshall TXARNG Field maintenance activity (co-located at Marshall Armory) and close the Tyler and Marshall USAR Centers. Build a new AFRC in Tyler, TX. (USA-0103)

n Close the Courcelle Brothers United States Army Reserve Center with adjoining organizational maintenance activity, the Rutland ARNG Armory, and the Rutland USAR area maintenance support activity (leased) and constructs an Armed Forces Reserve Center and Support site in Rutland, VT. (USA-0105)

n Closes the Ludlow, N. Springfield, and Windsor ARNG centers. Closes USAR Chester Memorial and Berlin (terminates lease) Centers. Closes NRC in White River Jct. And consolidates into a new AFRC (JFRC White River Junction) in the White River Junction, VT area. (USA-0138)

Scenarios Involvedn Close a leased United States Army Reserve Centers (USARCs) in Cape

Girardeau and close 3 Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) Armories (Cape Girardeau, Jackson, and Charleston). All affected units will relocate to new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) (USA-0087)

n 9th Regional Readiness Command and the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) will close existing United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in Greentop (leased facility) and MOARNG Armory in Kirksville, Missouri and construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) in Kirksville. All affected units will relocate to this new facility. (USA-0088)

n Closes five Army Installation Status Report (ISR) RED state-owned facilities (Henryetta, Okemah, Stilwell, Muskogee, and Pryor Readiness Centers) and one ISR GREEN, under-utilized Federal facility (Muskogee). Create one Center (AFRC) in the Muskogee area. (USA-0093)

n Close Puerto Rico Army National Guard ( PRARNG) Center in Mayaguez and realign the Aguadilla-Ramey United States Army Reserve (USAR); construct a new center vicinity of Mayaguez, PR. (USA-0097)

n Closes 3 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG Armories - Denton, Irving, and Denison) (1 leased) and 1 United States Army Reserve(USAR) Center in the Dallas area. Centers suffer acreage constraints and cannot be expanded. Build 89,000 square foot Center in the Lewisville, TX area. Location to be determined. Estimated land acquisition cost is $450,000 ($30,000 per acre; requirement is for 11.5 acres). (USA 0098)

n Close 2 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armories (Lufkin and Nacogdoches), terminate lease of 1 USAR Center in Lufkin. Collocate all units assigned to those facilities to be constructed (a new 57,600 square foot facility) in vicinity of Lufkin, TX. (USA-0100)


DRAFT

Scenarios Involvedn Closes Truman Olson USARC in Madison, the G.F.

Oconnel USARC in Madison, Realigns Madison (Bowman) WIARNG Armory, the Madison WIARNG Armory (2400 Wright St) and the Madison WIARNG Armory (1420 Wright St.) (small units move out of existing centers but does not close them). Consolidates units into a newly constructed AFRC in Madison area with acreage identified next to the gate of the WIANG Base. (Not on the ANG Base) (USA-0200)

n Closes the Broken Arrow, Eufaula, Okmulgee, Tahlequa, Haskell, Muskogee, Stilwell, Cushing and Wagoner OKARNG Readiness Centers. Closes the OKARNG Okmulgee Field Maintenance Shop #14. Consolidate all units into a new AFRC in Broken Arrow. Potentially closes the NMCRC in Broken Arrow. (USA-0214)

Scenarios Involvedn Close the Adrian B. Rhodes AFRC in Wilmington, NC

which houses 2 USAR units and a USNR unit. Construct a new AFRC and OMS in Wilmington, NC. (USA-0171)

n Close Cedar Rapids AFRC (USAR and USNR) (current). Close Cedar Rapids ARNG Armory/Org Maintenance Shop and consolidate into a new AFRC in Cedar Rapids (USA-0176)

n Close Wilson Kramer USARC and consolidate with Navy and USMCR into a new AFRC in Allentown/Bethlehem, PA. (USA-0177)

n Close Amarillo Readiness Center/OMS #2, Hale County Airport Readiness Center, Pampa Readiness Center (TXARNG), Blucher Tharp USARC and NMRC Amarillo. Possible participation from NRC Lubbock. Consolidate into a new AFRC/OMS in Amarillo, TX (yet to be determined in the Amarillo area). (USA-0181) Close Bossier City and Shreveport USARCs and consolidate into an AFRC with NMCRC Shreveport (Proposes acquiring additional land next to the NMCRC and ADD/ALT the NMCRC to convert that facility to an AFRC. (USA-0182)

H&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093, 0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)


DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093, 0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)

Scenarios Involvedn Close Germantown Memorial and James W. Reese

USARCs and MCRC Folsom and consolidate into a new AFRC in Chester/Germantown area. (USA-0162)

n Closes Serenti USARC/OMS and Wilkes/BarreUSARC/OMS, Scranton PAARNG Armory, and MCRC Wyoming ( Forty Fort) and NRC in Avoca and consolidate all units into a new AFRC/OMS in Scranton, PA.( site to be determined). (USA-0163)

n Close MAJ Robert Kirkwood USARC in Newark, Close William Nelson ARNG Center in Newark and NMCRC Newark and consolidate into a new AFRC in Newark, DE. Encroached facilities due to urbanization. (USA-0164)

n Close 4 IAARNG installations (at Jefferson, Newton, Chariton, and Knoxville). Move all affected units to a new ARNG Readiness Center (New MILCON) (IAARNG is currently looking in Indianola area, but final location not identified yet). (USA-0169)

Scenarios Involvedn Close the Taylor and (51st St) TXARNG

Armories, the 51st St FMS, and the leased Round Rock USARC in Austin, TX. Construct a new, AFRC/FMS in Round Rock, TX. (USA-0146)

n Close Brownsville TXARNG Center, and Rathjen USAR Center in Brownsville, TX and Build a new AFRC (Brownsville) at a new site in Brownsville, TX. (USA-0148)

n Close LAARNG Baton Rouge Center / OMS #8 facility. Close USAR (Marvin J. Roberts USARC USAR owned land at Alonmaster, LA.) Close NMCRC and consolidate into a new AFRC/OMS (AFRC Baton Rouge) in Baton Rouge. (USA-0153)

n Close 1 MIARNG, Close NMCRC Grand Rapids (USNR goes to Fort Custer and USMCR goes to new AFRC in Grand Rapids) and construct a new AFRC in Grand Rapids Industrial Park near Gerald R. Ford Airport. (USA-0154)

n Closes Milwaukee ARNG Armory and OMS, and 1 NMCRC and consolidate in a new AFRC in Milwaukee. (USA-0160)


DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093, 0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)

Proposed Resolution

n Requires heightened monitoring to ensure any resulting recommendation properly reflects contingencies.

Conflicts

n Other Availability of receiving location uncertain because DoD does not own/control the land. Requires purchase of land; availability and cost uncertain

Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # E&T-0060

Scenario Title: Establish Joint Strike Fighter Integrated Training Center

Description:

Establish an Integrated Training Center at Columbus, MS for the Joint Strike Fighter Program. The intent is to consolidate maintenance and flight training for the Joint Strike Fighter.

Date Created: 12/21/2004

Receiving Bases Activities being Received

Columbus AFB (Columbus, MS) - Receive Joint Strike Fighter Integrated Training Center

Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 231 of 1138

Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA

Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # HSA-0046

Scenario Title: MAH-MAH-0034 (Alt to MAH-0001): Consolidate DISA Components outside of DC Area

Description:

Close 5 leased locations and realign 4 leased locations, Arlington Service Center (Navy), and Ft. Belvoir by consolidating components of DISA at Offutt Air Force Base.

Justification/Impact:- Consolidation of HQ locations from 11 to 1 eliminates redundancy and enhances efficiency. - Encompasses 1.06 million GSF (or equivalent), as currently reported. Computed space required at 200 GSF/person = 754,200 GSF.- Eliminates 581,000 USF of leased space within the DC Area (726,000 GSF equiv). - 5 leased locations can be closed: approx. 555,000 USF.- Affects 4,714 personnel, as currently reported. Scenario estimates a 20% personnel savings as a result of consolidation, or 943 positions. - Enhances AT/FP- Relocates major tenant from Arlington Service Center and allows Navy to consider closing that installation. - Offutt AFB reports 26,986 GSF of vacant administrative space and sufficient land to accommodate 5.6 million GSF of new administrative space.- Scenario does not consolidate the following locations: Anacostia Annex, Chambersburg, and Mechanicsburg.


Losing Bases Losing Activities

5600 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, VA (Falls Church, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Arlington Service Center (Arlington, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Belvoir (Fort Belvoir, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Crystal Gateway 3; Arlington; VA (Arlington, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Fern Street Warehouse; Arlington; VA (Arlington, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Hoffman 1; Alexandria; VA (Alexandria, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Joint Spectrum Center; Annapolis; MD (Annapolis, MD) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Northpoint Building; Sterling; VA (Sterling, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Skyline Five; Falls Church; VA (Falls Church, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Skyline Four ; Falls Church; VA (Falls Church, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate

Skyline Place (Skyline VII); Falls Church; VA (Falls Church, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate


Offutt AFB (Bellevue, NE) - Receive Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)

DISA



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USAF-0057

Scenario Title: Close Scott AFB (S300)

Description:

Close Scott AFB. The 375th Airlift Wing will inactivated. The wings C-21 aircraft will be distributed to Andrews, Peterson, Wright-Patterson, and Randolph AFBs. The planned move of C-9 aircraft from Andrews to Scott will be cancelled. C-40 aircraft originally propgrammed for Scott willlbe redirected to Andrews. The 126th Air Refueling Wing will remain in its current location and operate from Mid America Airport. Headquarrters Air Mobility Command and United States Transportation Command will relocate to Offutt AFB, Nebraska.



Scott AFB (Belleville, IL) - Close 375th Airlift Wing - Inactivate

C-21 Airlift Squadron (14 PAA) - Relocate

KC-135R Tanker Squadron (12 PAA) - Relocate


Andrews AFB (Camp Springs, MD) - Receive C-21 Airlift Squadron (3 PAA)

Peterson AFB (Colorado Springs, CO) - Receive C-21 Airlift Squadron (2 PAA)

Randolph AFB (Universal City, TX) - Receive C-21 Airlift Squadron (6 PAA)

Scott AFB (Belleville, IL) - Receive KC-135R Tanker Squadron (12 PAA) to Mid-America Airport

Wright-Patterson AFB (Fairborn, OH) - Receive




Scenario Title: MAHCOCOMs0011: Realign SOUTHCOM HQ

Description:

Realign SOUTHCOM HQ by purchasing SOUTHCOM HQs leased facility and land in Miami, FL.Reduces leased space/costs for 239,714 GSF.Enhances AT/FP.In addition to utilizing main HQ building, MILCON will be required in order to move personnel (372) from satellite facilities onto main campus.



SOUTHCOM HQ. (Miami, FL) - OTHER SOUTHCOM HQ - Other


SOUTHCOM HQ. (Miami, FL) - Receive SOUTHCOM HQ




Scenario Title: MAH-COCOMs-0015, Realign JFOCM Leased Facilities

Description:

Realign JFCOM by purchasing JFCOM leased facility and land in Suffolk, VA.

Reduces lease space/costs for 619,030 GSF.



JFCOM Leased Facilities (Suffolk, VA) - OTHER JFCOM Leased Facilities - Other


JFCOM Leased Facilities (Suffolk, VA) - Receive JFCOM Leased Facilities



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # INT-0003

Scenario Title: Consolidate NCR-Based NGA at Chantilly/ Westfields, VA

Description:

Realign NGA functions at Bethesda, MD (Sumner and Dalecarlia sites) named Erskine Hall, Emory Bldg, Maury Hall, Roberdeau Hall, Abert Hall, Ruth Bldg, Fremont Bldg, Motor Poll, and Warren Bldg; Close NGA functions at Reston, VA, named 1 and 2; Realign NGA functions at Newington, VA, named 8510, 8520 and 8530; Close NGA functions at Dulles, VA, named Dulles North (or its successor, Reston 3); Realign National Geospatial Intelligence College function at Ft Belvoir, VA, named Bldgs 211, 214, 215, and 220; Close NGA and NGIC functions in Bldg 213 at Southwest Federal Center, DC; Realign NGA functions within NRO facility, Westfields; by relocating and consolidating to a new facility on commercially purchased real estate adjacent to the current NRO facility at Chantilly/Westfields, VA.

This scenario disestablishes all of the functions currently performed at the NCR locations named above and consolidates the functions into a new facility on 150 acres adjacent to the current NRO facility at Westfields. The requirement for the 150 acres is due to vulnerability and security reasons.



Belvoir (Fort Belvoir, VA) - National Geospatial Intelligence College - Disestablish

Bethesda Facility (Sumner and Dalecarlia Sites) (Bethesda, MD) -

Dulles North (Reston, VA) -

Newington 1, 2, and 3 (Newington, VA) -

NRO Westfields (Chantilly, VA) -

Reston 1 and 2 (Reston, VA) -

Washington Navy Yard (Washington, DC) - Bldg 213 - Disestablish


Purchase land/facility at Chantilly/Westfields, VA (Chantilly, VA) - Receive



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # INT-0007

Scenario Title: Consolidate Select Missouri-Based NGA at Arnold, MO

Description:

Realign NGA functions at St. Louis 2d Street named Bldgs 05, 07, 12, 18, 20, 22, 25, 36, 37, and 39; by relocating and consolidating to a new facility on commercially purchased real estate at Arnold, MO.

This scenario disestablishes all of the NGA functions currently performed at the St. Louis area locations named above and consolidates the functions into a new facility on 80 acres at a location to be determined at Arnold, MO. The requirement for the 80 acres is due to vulnerability and security reasons.

The exact location for the new facility is classified.



St. Louis 2nd Street Facility (St. Louis, MO) -


Purchase land/facility at Arnold, MO (Arnold, MO) - Receive



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0017

Scenario Title: 24 AFRC Jonesboro AR

Description:

Closes the Jonesboro Armory (includes an Organizational Maintenance Site (OMS)) and close the Paragould Armory and the Jonesboro USARC. Construct a new AFRC/OMS in Jonesboro, AR.



JONESBORO ARMORY/OMS 01 (Jonesboro, AR) - Close CO A 875 EN - Relocate

CO A 875 EN Main - Relocate

HHC 875 EN - Relocate

OMS 01 - Relocate

W8AX21 OMS 01 (FTS) - Relocate

WP1YA0 875 EN BN CO A (AGR) - Relocate

WP1YT0 875 EN BN HHC (AGR) - Relocate

JONESBORO USARC (Jonesboro, AR) - Close DET 2 392 CM CO - Relocate

PARAGOULD ARMORY (PARAGOULD, AR) - Close CO C 875 EN - Relocate

WP1YC0 875 EN BN CO C (AGR) - Relocate


Jonesboro AR AFRC (Jonesboro, AR) - Receive CO A 875 EN

CO A 875 EN Main

CO C 875 EN

DET 2 392 CM CO

HHC 875 EN

OMS 01

W8AX21 OMS 01 (FTS)

WP1YA0 875 EN BN CO A (AGR)

WP1YC0 875 EN BN CO C (AGR)

WP1YT0 875 EN BN HHC (AGR)




Scenario Title: 28 AFRC El Dorado, AR

Description:

Close the El Dorado Armory (ARARNG) and the Rufus N. Garrett Jr. El Dorado USARC, collocating the units into a new AFRC in El Dorado, AR.



EL DORADO ARMORY (EL DORADO, AR) - Close CO A 3/153 IN - Relocate

WQN0A0 3/153 IN CO A (AGR) - Relocate

RUFUS N GARRETT JR USARC (EL DORADO, AR) - Close CO B 3/153 IN - Relocate

HHB 142 FA - Relocate

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR) - Relocate

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS) - Relocate

WQN0B0 3/153 IN CO B (AGR) - Relocate


EL DORADO AFRC (EL DORADO, AR) - Receive CO A 3/153 IN

CO B 3/153 IN

HHB 142 FA

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR)

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS)

WQN0A0 3/153 IN CO A (AGR)

WQN0B0 3/153 IN CO B (AGR)




Scenario Title: 92 AFRC Oklahoma City,OK

Description:

Closes five ARNG armories (Oaklahoma City Armoy (44th Street Readiness Center), Enid (includes FMS #10 in Enid), El Reno, Minco, and Pawnee (Pawnee is vacant.)); and two USAR centers (Perez and Krowse). Realigns two units from the MidWest City Readiness Center. Construct a new AFRC/OMS in Oklahoma City, OK.



BILLY A KROWSE USARC (OKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Close WZLR99 290 4 BDE LANES (AGR) - Relocate

2/290 IN - Relocate

3/290 BN (CSS FE) 4BDE75DI - Relocate

3/290 IN - Relocate

353 EN - Relocate

PCS STUDENTS-BILLET LOAD (SCHOOL CODE F615) - Relocate

TEAM 2 2 JA - Relocate

SMSO ( OK ) - Relocate

RDT OFFICE 90 2 - Relocate

TEAM 6 2 JA - Relocate

WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (AGR) - Relocate

WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (FTS) - Relocate

WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE AUG CS-FE (FTS) - Relocate

WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE CS-FE (AGR) - Relocate

WZLR99 290 4 BDE AUG LANES (FTS) - Relocate

2/290 BN (CS FE)4BDE75DIV - Relocate

EL RENO ARMORY (EL RENO, OK) - Close BTRY C 1/160 FA - Relocate

WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (AGR) - Relocate

WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (FTS) - Relocate

ENID ARMORY/OMS 10 (Enid, OK) - Close 1345 TC DET 1 - Relocate

45 FA - Relocate

OMS 10 - Relocate

W8A860 OMS 10 (FTS) - Relocate

WPS3T2 120 EN BN HSC DET 2 (AGR) - Relocate

WPSWAA 45 FA BDE HHB (AGR) - Relocate

WXB7A1 1345 TC CO DET 1 (AGR) - Relocate

MANUEL A PEREZ JR USARC (OKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Close 2291 SEC 3 - Relocate

ENV PROT SPEC - Relocate

RTD OFFICE 90 1 - Relocate

W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (AGR) - Relocate

W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (FTS) - Relocate



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004MidWest City Readiness Center (Oklahoma City, OK) - Realignment MidWest City Armory - Realignment

MidWest City Armory1 - Realignment




MINCO ARMORY (MINCO, OK) - Close CO A DET 1 1/179 IN - Relocate

WPS9A1 1/179 IN CO A DET 1 (AGR) - Relocate

OAKLAHOMA CITY ARMORY (OAKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Close CO A 1/179 IN - Relocate

CO C 1/179 IN - Relocate

WPS9A0 1/179 IN CO A (AGR) - Relocate

WPS9C0 1/179 IN CO C (AGR) - Relocate


OAKLAHOMA CITY, OK AFRC (OAKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Receive CO A 1/179 IN

2/290 BN (CS FE)4BDE75DIV

2/290 IN

2291 SEC 3

3/290 BN (CSS FE) 4BDE75DI

3/290 IN

353 EN

BTRY C 1/160 FA

TEAM 6 2 JA

WZLR99 290 4 BDE AUG LANES (FTS)

1345 TC DET 1

CO C 1/179 IN

ENV PROT SPEC

OMS 10

PCS STUDENTS-BILLET LOAD (SCHOOL CODE F615)

RDT OFFICE 90 2

RTD OFFICE 90 1

45 FA

SMSO ( OK )

WZLR99 290 4 BDE LANES (AGR)

W8A860 OMS 10 (FTS)

W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (AGR)

W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (FTS)

WPS3T2 120 EN BN HSC DET 2 (AGR)

WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (AGR)

WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (FTS)

CO A DET 1 1/179 IN

WPS9A1 1/179 IN CO A DET 1 (AGR)

WPS9A0 1/179 IN CO A (AGR)



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004WPSWAA 45 FA BDE HHB (AGR)

WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (AGR)

WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (FTS)

WXB7A1 1345 TC CO DET 1 (AGR)

WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE AUG CS-FE (FTS)

WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE CS-FE (AGR)

WPS9C0 1/179 IN CO C (AGR)

TEAM 2 2 JA




Scenario Title: 196 AFRC NW Houston,TX

Description:

Close the Beaumont, Port Arthur, Port Neches (includes the Port Neches Field Maintenance Site (FMS)), and Orange TXARNG facilities and #2 and #3 Houston USAR centers. Collocate these units in a new AFRC on a site TBD in the Northwest Houston area.



BEAUMONT READINESS CENTER (BEAUMONT, TX) - Close CIV EMPLOYEES 1 - Relocate

HHB 1/133 FA - Relocate

HQ 1/133 FA - Relocate

WYQXT0 1/133 FA HHB (AGR) - Relocate

HOUSTON USARC 2 (L) (HOUSTON, TX) - Close WVN4AA 340 CM CO (FTS) - Relocate

327 CO SMOKE/DECON (D) - Relocate

340 CO SMOKE/DECON (D) - Relocate

449 EN - Relocate

808 EN CO PIPELINE CONST - Relocate

HHD 450 CHEM BN - Relocate

RTD OFFICE 1 - Relocate

TEAM 1463 EN - Relocate

TEAM 2 463 EN - Relocate






TM FFTG HQ 463 EN - Relocate

WRZZAA 463 EN TM (AGR) - Relocate

WRZZAA 463 EN TM (FTS) - Relocate

WS50AA 808 EN CO (AGR) - Relocate

WS50AA 808 EN CO (FTS) - Relocate

WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (AGR) - Relocate

WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (FTS) - Relocate

WVJUAA 327 CM CO (AGR) - Relocate

WVJUAA 327 CM CO (FTS) - Relocate

WVN4AA 340 CM CO (AGR) - Relocate

337 EN - Relocate



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004HOUSTON USARC 3/AMSA 73 (G) (HOUSTON, TX) - Close 31 TC DET FRT CONS/DISTR - Relocate

369 TC TM TERM SUPER DET - Relocate

453 TC - Relocate

614 TC DET AUTO CGO DOC - Relocate

651 TC DET HARBORMASTER - Relocate

HHC 348 BN TERMINAL - Relocate

RTD OFFICE 2 - Relocate

TEAM 4, 1 JA - Relocate

WSQ6AA 369 TC DET (FTS) - Relocate

WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (AGR) - Relocate

WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (FTS) - Relocate

WZPRAA 453 TC CO (AGR) - Relocate

WZPRAA 453 TC CO (FTS) - Relocate

WZPWAA 614 TC DET (FTS) - Relocate

WZZXAA 651 TC DET (FTS) - Relocate

ORANGE READINESS CENTER (ORANGE, TX) - Close SVC BTRY 1/133 FA - Relocate

WYQXS0 1/133 FA SVC BTY (AGR) - Relocate

PORT ARTHUR READINESS CENTER (PORT ARTHUR, TX) - Close BTRY B 1/133 FA - Relocate

WYQXB0 1/133 FA CO B (AGR) - Relocate

PORT NECHES READINESS CENTER/OMS 26 (PORT NECHES, TX) - Close OMS 26 - Relocate

SVC BTRY DET 1 1/133 FA - Relocate

W8BB46 OMS 26 (FTS) - Relocate

WYQXS1 1/133 FA SVC BTY DET 1 (AGR) - Relocate


AFRC NORTHWEST HOUSTON (HOUSTON, TX) - Receive HHC 348 BN TERMINAL

HHB 1/133 FA

327 CO SMOKE/DECON (D)

340 CO SMOKE/DECON (D)

369 TC TM TERM SUPER DET

449 EN

453 TC

614 TC DET AUTO CGO DOC

651 TC DET HARBORMASTER

808 EN CO PIPELINE CONST

BTRY B 1/133 FA

HHD 450 CHEM BN

TEAM 5 463 EN

WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (AGR)

TEAM 4, 1 JA

HQ 1/133 FA

OMS 26



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004RTD OFFICE 1

RTD OFFICE 2

SVC BTRY 1/133 FA

SVC BTRY DET 1 1/133 FA

TEAM 1463 EN

TEAM 2 463 EN

TEAM 3 463 EN

337 EN

CIV EMPLOYEES 1

WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (FTS)

TEAM 6 463 EN

TEAM 7 463 EN

TM FFTG HQ 463 EN

W8BB46 OMS 26 (FTS)

WRZZAA 463 EN TM (AGR)

WRZZAA 463 EN TM (FTS)

WS50AA 808 EN CO (AGR)

WS50AA 808 EN CO (FTS)

WSQ6AA 369 TC DET (FTS)

WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (AGR)

31 TC DET FRT CONS/DISTR

WZZXAA 651 TC DET (FTS)

WVJUAA 327 CM CO (AGR)

TEAM 4 463 EN

WVJUAA 327 CM CO (FTS)

WVN4AA 340 CM CO (AGR)

WVN4AA 340 CM CO (FTS)

WYQXB0 1/133 FA CO B (AGR)

WYQXS0 1/133 FA SVC BTY (AGR)

WYQXS1 1/133 FA SVC BTY DET 1 (AGR)

WYQXT0 1/133 FA HHB (AGR)

WZPRAA 453 TC CO (AGR)

WZPRAA 453 TC CO (FTS)

WZPWAA 614 TC DET (FTS)

WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (FTS)




Scenario Title: 29 AFRC NW ARK AR

Description:

Close the Fayetteville, Springdale, Rogers and Bentonville Armories. Close the Pond United States Army Reserve Center. Construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center on a site in NW Arkansas including a 7300 sf multi-purpose instructional facility which could be used as a barracks during mobilization.



BENTONVILLE ARMORY (BENTONVILLE, AR) - Close 1/142 BTRY A - Relocate

WP39A0 1/142 FA BTY A (AGR) - Relocate

FAYETTEVILLE AR ARMORY (FAYETTEVILLE, AR) - Close HQ 142 FA BDE - Relocate

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR) - Relocate

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS) - Relocate

LEROY R POND USARC (FAYETTEVILLE, AR) - Close 362 - Relocate

362 PO - Relocate

489 EN BN CO C DET 1 - Relocate

90th RRC RTD OFFICE - Relocate

CM - Relocate

WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE (FTS) - Relocate

WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE 1 (AGR) - Relocate

WRKCC2 489 EN BN CO C DET 1 (FTS) - Relocate

WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (AGR) - Relocate

WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (FTS) - Relocate

ROGERS ARMORY (ROGERS, AR) - Close 1/142 BTRY C - Relocate

WP39C0 1/142 FA BTY C (AGR) - Relocate

SPRINGDALE ARMORY (SPRINGDALE, AR) - Close 1/142 FA BTRY B - Relocate

WP39B0 1/142 FA BTY B (AGR) - Relocate


AFRC NW ARK (NW Arkansas, AR) - Receive WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (FTS)

1/142 BTRY C

1/142 FA BTRY B

362

362 PO

489 EN BN CO C DET 1

90th RRC RTD OFFICE

CM

WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE 1 (AGR)

WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE (FTS)

HQ 142 FA BDE

WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR)



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS)

WP39A0 1/142 FA BTY A (AGR)

WP39B0 1/142 FA BTY B (AGR)

WP39C0 1/142 FA BTY C (AGR)

WRKCC2 489 EN BN CO C DET 1 (FTS)

WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (AGR)

1/142 BTRY A




Scenario Title: 31 AFRC Tuscaloosa, AL

Description:

Close Finnel Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) and co-located Area Maintenance Support Activitiy (AMSA) #154, close 1 Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) facility and build a new facility. Affected units relocate to a new AFRC in Tuscaloosa, AL.



FINNELL AFRC (Tuscaloosa, AL) - Close 75th HSP COMBAT SPT (EAC) - Relocate

75th MD HUB - Relocate

AMSA 154 G TUSCALOOSA (FTS) - Relocate

NAVAL RESERVE UNIT - Relocate

WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (AGR) - Relocate

WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (FTS) - Relocate

POWELL-SHAMBLIN ARMORY (Northport, AL) - Close 31 CM AUG HHC BDE - Relocate

HHC 122 CM CHEM BDE - Relocate

WPS5AA 0031 CM BN HHD (AGR) - Relocate


AFRC Tuscaloosa, AL (Tuscaloosa, AL) - Receive 31 CM AUG HHC BDE

75th HSP COMBAT SPT (EAC)

75th MD HUB

AMSA 154 G TUSCALOOSA (FTS)

HHC 122 CM CHEM BDE

NAVAL RESERVE UNIT

WPS5AA 0031 CM BN HHD (AGR)

WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (AGR)

WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (FTS)




Scenario Title: 20 AFRC Middletown, CT

Description:

Close 2 United States Army Reserve (USAR) centers (Middletown and SGT George D. Libby) and 1 Area Maintenance Support Activity (AMSA 69) and the Connecticut Army National Guard (CTARNG) closes 3 Armories (Putnam, Manchester, and New Brittain) and the Newington VA Facility Lease. All affected units will move to a new 1200 man Tier II, Phase III Inter-Agency Site in Middletown, CT.



MANCHESTER ARMORY (MANCHESTER, CT) - Close 1/102 IN CO B - Relocate

MANCHESTER ARMORY CUSTODIAN - Relocate

WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (AGR) - Relocate

WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (FTS) - Relocate

MIDDLETOWN USARC (MIDDLETOWN, CT) - Close HQ, 1205 TC BN - Relocate

W7TSAA 1205 USA RAILWAY SVC BN (FTS) - Relocate

MiILFORD, CT AMSA 69 (G) (MiILFORD, CT) - Close AMSA 69 MILFORD CT (FTS) - Relocate

NEW BRITAIN ARMORY (NEW BRITAIN, CT) - Close 141 MD - Relocate

CO A, 1/102 IN - Relocate

NEW BRITAIN ARMORY CUSTODIAN - Relocate

STATE OF CT MARSHALLS - Relocate

WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (AGR) - Relocate

WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (FTS) - Relocate

WP90AA 141 MD CO (AGR) - Relocate

NEWINGTON ARMORY (NEWINGTON, CT) - Close 103 QM - Relocate

11 MP - Relocate

118 MD - Relocate

119 MP - Relocate

143 CS - Relocate

HSC, 118 MD - Relocate

WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (AGR) - Relocate

WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (FTS) - Relocate

WQBCAA 118 MD BN (FTS) - Relocate

WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (AGR) - Relocate

WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (FTS) - Relocate

PUTNAM ARMORY (PUTNAM, CT) - Close 250 EN - Relocate

PUTNAM ARMORY CUSTODIAN - Relocate

WP8YAA 250 EN CO (AGR) - Relocate

WP8YAA 250 EN CO (FTS) - Relocate



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004SSG GEORGE D LIBBY USARC (NEW HAVEN, CT) - Close 3414 - Relocate

3423 - Relocate

344 MP CO GUARD - Relocate

395 CS - Relocate

439 QM CO PETRO SUPP LUPS - Relocate

WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (AGR) - Relocate

WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (FTS) - Relocate

WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (AGR) - Relocate

WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (FTS) - Relocate

WSKYAA 344 MP CO (AGR) - Relocate

WSKYAA 344 MP CO (FTS) - Relocate


AFRC MIDDLETOWN (MIDDLETOWN, CT) - Receive 344 MP CO GUARD

3423

11 MP

118 MD

119 MP

141 MD

143 CS

250 EN

395 CS

STATE OF CT MARSHALLS

WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (AGR)

PUTNAM ARMORY CUSTODIAN

439 QM CO PETRO SUPP LUPS

AMSA 69 MILFORD CT (FTS)

CO A, 1/102 IN

HQ, 1205 TC BN

HSC, 118 MD

MANCHESTER ARMORY CUSTODIAN

1/102 IN CO B

3414

WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (FTS)

W7TSAA 1205 USA RAILWAY SVC BN (FTS)

WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (AGR)

WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (FTS)

WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (AGR)

WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (FTS)

WP8YAA 250 EN CO (AGR)

WP8YAA 250 EN CO (FTS)

103 QM

WSKYAA 344 MP CO (FTS)



Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (AGR)

NEW BRITAIN ARMORY CUSTODIAN

WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (FTS)

WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (AGR)

WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (FTS)

WQBCAA 118 MD BN (FTS)

WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (AGR)

WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (FTS)

WSKYAA 344 MP CO (AGR)

WP90AA 141 MD CO (AGR)




Scenario Title: 201 AFRC Cape Girardeau, MO

Description:

Close a leased United States Army Reserve Centers (USARCs) in Cape Girardeau and close 3 Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) Armories (Cape Girardeau, Jackson, and Charleston). All affected units will relocate to new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC).



CAPE GIRARDEAU ARMORY/OMS 03 (CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO) - Close

CAPE GIRARDEAU USARC (CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO) - Close

CHARLESTON MO ARMORY (CHARLESTON, MO) - Close

JACKSON MO ARMORY (JACKSON, MO) - Close


AFRC CAPE GIRARDEAU (CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO) - Receive




Scenario Title: 207 AFRC Kirksville, MO

Description:

9th Regional Readiness Command and the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) will close existing United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in Greentop (leased facility) and MOARNG Armory in Kirksville, Missouri and construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) in Kirksville. All affected units will relocate to this new facility.



GREENTOP USARC (GREENTOP, MO) - Close

KIRKSVILLE ARMORY (KIRKSVILLE, MO) - Close


AFRC KIRKSVILLE (KIRKSVILLE, MO) - Receive




Scenario Title: 99 AFRC Muskogee,OK

Description:

Closes five Army Installation Status Report (ISR) RED state-owned facilities (Henryetta, Okemah, Stilwell, Muskogee, and Pryor Readiness Centers) and one ISR GREEN, under-utilized Federal facility (Muskogee). Creates one 59,000 square foot Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) with a 7300 square foot Multi-use bldg on a site to be determined in the Muskogee area.



ALTON M ASHWORTH USARC (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Close

ARMORY/WHITAKER TRAINING (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Close

HENRYETTA ARMORY (HENRYETTA, OK) - Close

MUSKOGEE ARMORY (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Close

OKEMAH ARMORY (OKEMAH, OK) - Close

STILWELL ARMORY (STILWELL, OK) - Close


MUSKOGEE AFRC (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Receive




Scenario Title: 227 AFRC Mayaguez, PR

Description:

Close the fo

BRAC Minutes...20 Dec Process Overview BRAC Report Capacity Responses to JCSGs MV Briefs to ISG...

Documents

Transcript of BRAC Minutes...20 Dec Process Overview BRAC Report Capacity Responses to JCSGs MV Briefs to ISG...