Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

5
C H A R L ES W . BOUSTA N Y, JR., LO U I S I A N A SUBCOMMITTEE CHA I RMA N DIAN E B L ACK , TENNESSEE AARON SCHOCK , I LLINOIS LYNN JENKINS , KANSAS KENNY MARCHANT, TEXAS T OM REED , NEW YORK ERIK PAULSEN , MINNESOTA JOHN LEWIS , GEORG I A SUBCOMM I TTEE RANKING MEMBER XAVIER BE C ERRA , CALIFORNIA RON KIND , WISCONSIN JIM M c DERMOTT . WASHINGTON Douglas H. Shulman Commissio n e r Interna l Revenue Service Q:ongrrss of th r tinitrd ~ t a t r s 31iou.sc of COMMITTEE ON WAYS AN D MEANS WASH I NGTON, DC 20515 SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT October 6, 2011 1111 Const ituti o n Avenue , NW Washington, DC 20224 D ear Co mm i ssioner Shulman: DAVE CAMP, MIC HI GA N , CHAIR M A N SANDER M . LEV I N, M I C HI GAN , RANKING MEMBER C OMMITTEE ON WAY S AND MEANS JON TRAUB , STAFF DIRECTOR JENNI F ER SAFAV I AN , C OMM ITT EE GENERAL COUNSE L AND SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF D I RECTOR JAN I C E MAYS , MINOR I TY CHIEF COUNSEL KAREN M c AfEE, SUBCOMMITTEE MINORITY STAfF In t h e l s t few years, Co n g r ess and t h e In terna l Re ve nu e Service (" IRS ") have focused on the tax - exe mpt sec tor in an effo rt to incre ase co mplian ce and impr ove oversight. These efforts l e d to n ew rule s to pre ve nt se lf-d ea lin g a nd s imil ar ab u ses, in c re ase d rep orti n g requirements, and a well-publicized co mp l iance program that resulted in thousands of t ax - exempt s t a tu s revocations for n o n-compliant organizations. In a dditi o n to th ese ne w rule s an d comp li a nc e initiativ es, the House Wa ys and Mean s Subcommittee o n Oversight h as continued to explore current i ssues invo l v i ng the tax - exempt se c tor. As yo u know, in A pril of this year, the Subcommittees on Health a nd O ve r sig ht held a j oin t hearing that focused o n AARP , o n e o f the oldest a nd l arges t tax - exempt organizations in the Uni t ed States. During t hat hearing , many issues were raised regarding AARP's tax - exempt s t a tu s, includin g i ts organizational struc tur e a nd bu s ine ss activities , casting doubt on whether the orga ni za ti o n acts ex clu s i ve l y to promote th e welfare o f all seniors or i f it ha s s imply become a for-profit enterprise. Ind eed, AARP is not t he on l y ta x -exempt organization that more close l y r ese mble s a for-profit enterprise, r at h e r than a n organization f o rm ed for soc i a l welfare or pu b l ic charity . Members o f both Subcommittees h ave exp re ssed con ce rn that othe r tax-exempt organizations ma y not be complyin g with the l e tter or th e s piri t o f th e tax-exempt r eg im e, yet continue to enjoy the benefit s oftax exe mpt i on. Therefore, it i s my re s pon s ibilit y as the Chairman o f the O ve r s i g ht Subcommittee to explo r e the current r eg ul a tory environment, r eview th e s t a tu s o f new l aws and ongo i ng enforceme n t initi at i ves, a nd gat her i n f or m a ti on on c riti ca l i ss ue s in vo l v ing the tax -e xempt sector. Your r espo n ses to th e q ue stio n s detailed below w ill p rov i de the Subcommittee with a better und e rstanding o f the tax - exempt sector and some o f the i ss ue s r aised du ri ng the S ub comm i ttees' h ea rin g on AARP. Pl ease r emi t yo ur r esponses n o later than October 20, 20 . 1. 1. Overview o f t h e Ta x - Exemp t Sector a. Provid e a detail ed breakdown o f the number o f ac ti ve tax - exem p t organizations i n good s tanding with the IRS, brok en down b y t y pe (e.g., 501(c) ( 4 ), 50l(c)(10)).

Transcript of Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

8/2/2019 Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/boustany-ltr-to-shulman-oct611 1/5

CHARLES W. BOUSTANY, JR., LOUISIANA

SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMAN

DIANE BLACK, TENNESSEE

AARON SCHOCK, ILLINOIS

LYNN JENKINS, KANSAS

KENNY MARCHANT, TEXAS

TOM REED, NEW YORK

ERIK PAULSEN, MINNESOTA

JOHN LEWIS, GEORGIA

SUBCOMMITTEE RANKING MEM BER

XAVIER BECERRA, CALIFORNIA

RON KIND, WISCONSIN

JIM M c DERMOTT. WASHINGTON

Douglas H. Shulman

Commissioner

Internal Revenue Service

Q:ongrrss of thr tinitrd ~ t a t r s 31iou.sc of 1Rcprc.scntotiuc.s

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS

WASHINGTON, DC 20515

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT

October 6, 2011

1111 Constitution Avenue,NW

Washington, DC 20224

Dear Commissioner Shulman:

DAVE CAMP, MICHIGAN, CHAIRMAN

SANDER M. LEVIN, MICHIGAN , RANKING MEMB

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS

JON TRAUB, STAFF DIRECTOR

JENNIFER SAFAVIAN , COMM ITTEE GENERAL COUNSEL

AND SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF DIRECTOR

JAN ICE MAYS, MINORITY CHIEF COUNSEL

KAREN McAfEE, SUBCOMMITTEE MINORITY STAfF

In the last few years, Congress and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") have focused on the

tax-exempt sector in an effort to increase compliance and improve oversight. These efforts led to

new rules to prevent self-dealing and similar abuses, increased reporting requirements, and a

well-publicized compliance program that resulted in thousands of tax-exempt status revocations

for non-compliant organizations.

In addition to these new rules and compliance initiatives, the House Ways and Means

Subcommittee on Oversight has continued to explore current issues involving the tax-exempt

sector. As you know, in April of this year, the Subcommittees on Health and Oversight held a

j oint hearing that focused on AARP, one of the oldest and largest tax-exempt organizations in the

United States. During that hearing, many issues were raised regarding AARP's tax-exempt

status, including its organizational structure and business activities, casting doubt on whether the

organiza tion acts exclusively to promote the welfare of all seniors or if it has simply become a

for-profit enterprise. Indeed, AARP is not the only tax-exempt organization that more closely

resembles a for-profit enterprise, rather than an organization formed for social welfare or public

charity. Members of both Subcommittees have expressed concern that other tax-exempt

organizations may not be complying with the letter or the spirit of the tax-exempt regime, yet

continue to enjoy the benefits oftax exemption.

Therefore, it is my responsibility as the Chairman of the Oversight Subcommittee to explore

the current regulatory environment, review the status of new laws and ongoing enforcement

initiatives, and gather information on critical issues involving the tax-exempt sector. Your

responses to the questions detailed below will provide the Subcommittee with a betterunderstanding of the tax-exempt sector and some of the issues raised during the Subcommittees'

hearing on AARP. Please remit your responses no later than October 20, 20 . 1.

1. Overview of the Tax-Exempt Sector

a. Provide a detailed breakdown of the number of active tax-exempt organizations in

good standing with the IRS, broken down by type (e.g., 501(c)(4), 50l(c)(10)).

8/2/2019 Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/boustany-ltr-to-shulman-oct611 2/5

b. Provide a detailed breakdown of the IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities

Division's budget for 2008 through 2011. Specify the total number of employees

dedicated to tax-exempt organization work and how these resources are allocated

across the division.

c. How many tax-exempt organizations have been audited since 2008? Provide a

breakdown of all audits opened for each type of tax-exempt entity, the issues

identified for audit, and the current status of such audits. What was the average

length of a tax-exempt audit during this period?

d. How many new tax-exempt organizations did the IRS recognize in each of the last

three years for which data is available? Provide a breakdown of all new applications

for tax-exempt status by organization type and year for those years. Describe the

process by which an entity is granted tax-exempt status. What is the IRS procedure

for conducting periodic reviews of an organization's tax-exempt eligibility?

2. Compliance

Form 990 was recently revised and reorganized to require additional information reporting on

issues such as governance, financial and tax reporting, and foreign activities. For example, a

new schedule, ScheduleR, was added to Form 990 for organizations to report information on

related organizations. Among the goals motivating the redesign of Form 990 was the need to

improve compliance and increase the transparency and accountability of tax-exempt

organizations.

a. Provide a detailed explanation of how the IRS is using the new information obtained

from the new Form 990 to improve current enforcement efforts and future

compliance.

b. Provide a detailed explanation of how the redesigned Form 990 increased

transparency and accountability of tax-exempt organizations.

c. Have taxpayers expressed concerns to the IRS regarding the compliance burden

associated with the redesigned Form 990? If so, describe the primary compliance

issues identified by taxpayers and what the IRS has done, or plans to do, to address

taxpayer concerns.

d. Is the IRS contemplating any additional changes to Form 990 to further compliance

goals? If so, describe the planned modifications and their estimated effect on

compliance.

e. How is the IRS using the related organization information from the Schedule R?

What type of compliance problems is this schedule designed to curb? Is the

information reported on the Schedule helpful in improving compliance? If not, are

further changes to the schedule contemplated? If so, please describe the planned

modifications and their estimated effect on compliance.

2

8/2/2019 Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/boustany-ltr-to-shulman-oct611 3/5

f. Has the IRS identified any specific governance issues based on the additional

information provided on the redesigned Form 990? If so, provide a detailed

description of the new issues identified.

g. The IRS recently revoked the tax-exempt status of thousands of organizations across

the country for failure to file tax returns as part of the automatic revocation program.

1. What is the current status of this program?

11. How many taxpayers reinstated their tax-exempt status using the procedures

in Revenue Procedures 2011-8,2011-36, and 2011-43?

111. How many taxpayers are currently in the process of being reinstated?

1v. What is the average length of time for the processing of a reinstatement

request?

v. Is the IRS planning to issue any further guidance related to the automaticrevocation program?

3. Unrelated Business Income

a. In 2009, the Congressional Research Service estimated that revenues from tax

exempt organizations were $1.4 trillion and the value of assets held by tax-exempt

organizations totaled $2.6 trillion.1

Provide IRS data regarding the revenue and assets

of tax-exempt organizations for 2008,2009, and 2010.

b. How does the IRS identify unrelated business taxable income issues for audit?

Provide a breakdown of the total number of tax-exempt audits opened by the IRS in

2009 and 20 I 0 that involved unrelated business taxable income issues.

c. Provide the following figures concerning all 50 I (c) organizations for the 2009 and

2010 tax year, identifying each type separately.

1. How many organizations reported unrelated business taxable income and

income exempt from the unrelated business income tax?

11. How many organizations reported both unrelated business taxable and income

exempt from the unrelated business income tax?

111. What is the total amount of tax-exempt royalty income, and tax-exempt rental

income reported? What is the average amount of those sources of income

among the entities that reported receiving at least some such income?

1v. What are the most common tax-exempt organization errors related to

reporting trade or business income?

1 Sec An Overview of the Nonprofit and Chariwhle Sector, Congressional Research Service (Nov. 17, 2009).

3

8/2/2019 Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/boustany-ltr-to-shulman-oct611 4/5

4. Audits

v. Describe IRS procedures for reviewing returns by tax-exempt organizations

that report unrelated business taxable income.

a. What percentage of the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division's budget is

allocated towards audits and examinations?

b. Explain how the IRS reviews allegations of excessive political campaign activity by

tax -exempt organizations.

c. What issues does the IRS prioritize when conducting audits of tax-exempt

organizations, or reviewing the returns of such organizations?

d. The redesigned Form 990 requires additional information on related and subsidiary

organizations. Has the new information prompted an audit or been of assistance

during the course of an audit? If so, please describe the manner in which the

information has been used.

5. Current Tax-Exempt Enforcement Initiatives

a. In addition to the Hospitals and Universities projects (referenced in sections (c) at1d

(d)), are there any tax-exempt compliance projects that the IRS is currently

undertaking? Does the IRS have plans to launch any such projects in the upcoming

year? If so, please describe the anticipated compliance project.

b. Excise Taxes/Penalties

1. How many disqualified persons or organization managers were subject to

penalties under IRC §4958 for violating the excess benefit rules between 2006and 2010?

11. How many donor advised funds or supporting organizations were subject to

the excess benefit rules of!RC §4958 between 2006 and 2010? Have any of

these organizations lost their tax-exempt status?

m. How many tax-exempt organizations have been subject to the excise tax under

IRC §4911 between 2006 and 20 I 0 for failure to comply with the lobbying

rules?

1v. How many tax-exempt organizations has the IRS found to be engaged in taxshelter transactions between 2006 and 20 I 0? Provide a breakdown of the type

of transaction and the results of the audit/investigation.

c. Hospitals

1. Describe the IRS's current plans to comply with the new requirement in IRC

§4959 to review, at least once every three years, the community benefit

4

8/2/2019 Boustany Ltr to Shulman Oct_6.11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/boustany-ltr-to-shulman-oct611 5/5

activities of each hospital organization that is subject to the requirements

under IRC §501(r).

11. What steps is the IRS taking to comply with the requirement under IRC

§9007(e) of Pub. L. 111-148, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, to

submit an annual report to Congress, including the Ways and Means

Committee, regarding the level of charity care provided by all hospitals

(taxable, charitable, and government)?

d. Universities

1. On May 7, 2010, the IRS issued its interim report on the colleges and

universities compliance project. What is the status of the final report and

when does the IRS anticipate completing the final report?

11. Based on college and university responses to the compliance project

questionnaire, the IRS has initiated audits looking at a number of issues,

including excessive compensation and unrelated business income.

1. Provide a detailed explanation of how the IRS is identifying and

selecting issues for audit as part of the college and university

compliance project.

2. List all issues the IRS has identified for audit related to the college and

university compliance project.

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

.

Sincerely,

5