Boundaries, Identity, and the “Indian."

download Boundaries, Identity, and the “Indian."

of 16

Transcript of Boundaries, Identity, and the “Indian."

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    1/16

    1

    Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian.

    Jorge E. Arboleda

    In this paper I approach the concept of boundaries and their relationship to Democracy in

    a context of ethnic struggle in Latin America. Boundaries are defined here as in Wolins

    Fugitive Democracy: Boundaries proclaim identity and stand ready to repel difference.

    They may signify exclusion- Keep-out!- or containment Keep inside! (Wolin, 1996:

    31). I explore how boundaries are constructed through a power relationship between a

    dominant and dominated culture. Identities are thus external, and perhaps internal,

    representation of boundaries. Individuals wear their boundaries like suits, and express

    them through cultural and political views.

    Boundaries correspond with to individual socio-economic status, and they are

    perceptible in physical space. Physical, geographical, and cultural spaces are

    correspondent with boundaries, especially political boundaries. Good neighborhoods sit

    next to bad ones separated by invisible barriers dividing diverse realities.

    Democracy, as Wolin points, is a project concerned with the political

    potentialities of ordinary citizens, that is, with their possibilities for becoming political

    beings through the self-discovery of common concerns and modes of action for realizing

    them (Wolin, 1996: 31). Thus, Democracy, by definition, attempts to conciliate

    boundaries and identities in a social space, paradoxically erasing the ethos of individual

    cultural identities as the dominated is annihilated or assimilated into the culture of the

    dominator. Thus, democracy seems to turn into a totalistic, homogenizing agent.

    My argument here is that in the case of Colombia, and other Latin American

    countries, attempts to democratize have not developed the political potentialities of

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    2/16

    2

    ordinary citizens to become political beings because peoples political beingness has

    been constructed through simulation and violence. First, identity is the result of a process

    of simulation in which a native-dominated culture has reinvented itself by maintaining

    primitive love for order (ritual, aesthetic, and political), and by incorporating western

    patterns of accumulation (as explained below by Lvi-Strauss). Second, identity has been

    formed by a violent relationship between dominant and dominated identities inherited

    from Spanish colonization.

    In both cases, the sense of belonging to an ethnic reality has been related to the

    individuals position as dominator or dominated. This simple categorization has replaced

    the old colonial Spanish division between white, Creole, Indian, mestizo, and black.

    Domination through violence has made it possible for individuals to prevail over others

    and, on occasion, to escape the stigma of old identities.

    I set my inquiry in an ethnographic context based on the relationship of a native

    Andean South American group, the Puraceos, to a dominant westernized pre-capitalistic

    culture of Colombia. I hope my findings help to uncover the presence of boundaries in

    developing societies where ethnic conflict is still very present.

    The Ethnographic Setting

    In 1991 I worked as a researcher for a mining company in the southwestern Andes of

    Colombia. Upon graduation, I was hired to write a biography of the founder of the mine,

    Manuel Maria Mosquera-Wallis. .

    The Case. On September 17, 1990, the inhabitants of the town of Purac were surprised

    by a fire in the sulfur mine "El Vinagre," located on the slopes of the Purac volcano.

    This fire was the sixth in the last ten years. The fire caused major economic hardship for

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    3/16

    3

    the Puraceos because most of them worked in the mine.

    The fire burned for 66 days. It destroyed most of the mine and expelled sulfur gases

    burning the vegetation and killing cattle, birds and other animals. Many Puraceos were

    hospitalized and treated for respiratory ailments. The mining company lost more than

    200,000 dollars.

    On September 17, the mining company Industrias Purac, called an emergency

    meeting to plan the best way to help the people and to avoid any further damages. In a

    contingency plan they decided to install temporary health centers, distribute anti-gas

    masks, and to print and distribute brochures to prevent new fires.

    I participated in the meeting, and afterwards, the president of the company asked

    my opinion on how to avoid panic in the region. Based on my experience with the

    Puraceos I answered: "When the volcano is angered it is necessary to bring San Miguel,

    the local religious patron, in procession." My suggestion was based on the Puraceos

    beliefs that San Miguel could calm the volcano's anger because he had proven to be the

    only one capable of that, during past fires.

    My comments were received very skeptically. It was impossible for the Industrias

    Puracs corps of engineers and management to imagine that San Miguel's procession

    would calm down the fire. .

    On September 19, while the non-Indigenous employees were working on a

    contingency plan, the local Workers Union had a meeting with the company's president

    and directors. To the management's surprise the Union's directors demanded a procession

    of San Miguel to calm the fire. The board of directors accepted the union's demand, and

    on September 20th the procession took place, stretching for 15 miles. The fire was over

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    4/16

    4

    one week later.

    The differences between indigenous non-indigenous beliefs in regards to how deal

    with the fire exemplify the different languages of the dominated and the dominators. This

    dichotomy was further underlined as I continued my research. The most interested person

    in the project seemed to be one of the daughters of the mines founder. As my research in

    the archives progressed it became clear that the daughter wanted the biography to show

    her father in a different light than that that which the Puraceos saw him. I tried to be

    sensitive to her requests, but in the end what I wrote didn't correspond with her desires.

    The company responded as I expected: they did not publish the book. On one hand I had

    the indigenous perception of the founder and on the other the story Mosquera's family

    wanted me to tell to the people outside Purac. For the family, and the well-to-do and

    middle class of Colombia, the mines founder was a hero, and an innovator.

    For me, it was clear that the views of the indigenous, and the mines owners did

    not coincide. The latter thought their hero was a remarkable man, meanwhile the

    indigenous thought the man that was a devils creation. They thought his greatness was

    based not on his ability to develop a successful mining enterprise, but rather in his

    capacity to bargain with evil, and to freely surpass lifes and deaths spaces.

    These Puraceos beliefs are based on their world view. The Puraceos spiritual

    world is divided into hot and cold, fire and ice, and governed by creatures from both

    environments. The devil, their main spiritual creature, is the hottest. He lives inside the

    volcano where he has his "balcony home." They said, Manuel was a strong worker who

    did not fear the Devil and who was allowed to live in the Devils house. He was a poor

    man with many debts when he started working in the mine. In order to pay off his debts,

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    5/16

    5

    and to develop his mine projects, Manuel sold his soul and his employee's souls to the

    devil." The Indigenous were convinced that Manuel had to sign an evil pact with the

    devil, and didnt want to be carried to hell in the hands of Mosquera, by being his

    employees, but neither did they want to be return to the poverty which characterized their

    lives before the mine provided their meager wages.

    Indianess: Boundaries and the Building of Identity.

    There are two main characteristics in the construction of Indigenous and non-Indigenous

    identities in Latin America. The first is related to a process of simulation in which the

    individual recognizes himself through comparison with others, invention, and

    counterfeiting. The second is related to the position of the individual and his social group

    as a part of a former imperial violent culture. I examine these two points below.

    1. Simulation and Identity. The early origins of actual identities are marked by self-

    recognition in the mirror of otherness. We believe in what we are because of the

    characteristics we see in others. In post colonial Latin America, as Mexican writer

    Octavio Paz points, the construction of an identity has been a process of simulation.

    Simulation has given us the opportunity to invent, or rather to counterfeit, and thus to

    evade our condition. (Paz, 1985: 43). We see the Indian far from us but also as part of

    us. We know he is the Indian and we know that because hes reflected in the mirror in

    which we look at ourselves. Or, as Lvi-Strauss has explained: we see in the primitive the

    same mind, with the same logic, the same categories, the same requirements of order, and

    in short the same capacities for understanding. Only because of moral reasons, we keep

    him in an enigmatic, even mystifying, otherness (Hnaff, 1998: 26). In the case of the

    Puraceos, their Indianess is not other but our, and theirs, invention.

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    6/16

    6

    The purpose here is to explain the construction of the boundaries existing between

    the Puraceo and the non-Puraceo. We have heard stories and read books about how the

    history of Latin America began with the arrival of the Spaniards whose conquest and

    colonization aimed to reestablish recently abandoned medieval patterns of government

    and order. When Latin Americans imagine the conquistadores they have the romantic

    vision of an armored knight, carrying a sword and a cross, proudly riding a horse

    surrounded by Indian porters and a few slaves. No one stops to think about the distinct

    roles of each one. Most Latin Americans, especially men, see themselves as the one

    dressed in the tin vest, seated on the white horse, while no one, except few

    anthropologists and the Indians themselves- who dare to travel between the two

    identities, stop to think themselves as the Indian porter. Then comes the question, is it

    true that only because of technological superiority the Spaniards where able to ride the

    horse while their luggage was carried by the Indian porter? It is hard to believe that gun

    powder was the sole factor in allowing the Spanish complete domination in an

    undiscovered world where the indigenous were the majority.

    Language, Order, and Accumulation. One of the answers we can give to the question

    above is related to the popularization of the Spanish language. The use of a lingua franca

    allowed the Spaniards to travel between mentalities and to forge local thinking by

    teaching the use of their mother tongue. Scholars, like Benedict Anderson, have proved

    this. It was the versatility of the Spanish language, and its popularity through printing,

    which allowed Indian nations formerly separated by geography and wars to communicate

    to each other (Anderson, 1983: 40).

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    7/16

    7

    Whatever beauty and versatility the Spanish language had, it was not only this

    which made the criollos, the sons of the conquistadores and colonizers, to prevail in the

    Latin American social order. It was perhaps, the promise of political order and peace

    would arrive one day to the lives of the Puraceos. At least those were the teachings the

    Spanish church began implementing since the early days of the conquest. And it was

    thanks to those teachings that the Spaniards came to finally recognize the advantage of

    having priests among their crews. As Friar Juan de Santa Gertrudis writes on his

    evangelical work in the 19th

    century:I replied to the Indian chief that they [the Indians]

    should come with us, that I will give them the gift of our teachings. He replied no, that his

    people wanted me to go with them, that they needed me, and that in exchange, they would

    pay me with monkeys, fish, plantains, fruits, etc. (Santa Gertrudis, (1775) 1970: Vol. I:

    311).

    Language domination and teachings about socially moving to a better life

    signified the connection between two cultural features of Spaniards and Indians. This

    means that it was the combination of the colonizers hunger for wealth and the

    indigenous love for order, especially ritual order that facilitated the expansion of the

    Spanish colonization. As Lvi-Strauss has explained, what made different the world of

    the primitive Indians from that of the Spanish-Creole was the latters interest in

    accumulating wealth, discoveries, techniques, and knowledge (Lvi-Strauss, 1976: 350).

    Thus, while Santa Gertrudis narrated how poor these Indians were by only possessing

    few hammocks that were kept by their chief, he also witnessed their enjoyment of the

    mysteries of the holly trinity, and their enjoyment of learning the new mixed Spanish-

    Indian language while pronouncing Gods new words: Pancoa dios payqu? -whos

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    8/16

    8

    God-, Dios payre god father-, Dios cary Gods son-, and Dios spiritu santo Gods

    holly spirit. Thus, while the conquerors could satiate their thirst for accumulation, the

    Indians were converted to Catholicism and into Spanish speakers while they dreamt of

    the ritualized paradise portrayed in the Spanish spoken teachings of the Bible.

    To believe that the Puraceos will enter into competition with the Spaniard for

    accumulating resources is a mistake. Their world, which we may call primitive, did not

    spin around possessions; it spins in a constant demand for order, especially ritual order:

    all sacred things must have their place (Lvi-Strauss, 1966: 10). And this desire for

    order was what the Indians may have shown to the Spanish cavalries as they militarily

    and ritually took possession of land and souls while promising the coming of paradise. As

    the conquistador Pascual de Andagoya writes: I entered their land with 150 men, 60 on

    horse and the rest on foot. The Indians [from the town of Apirama] waited for me formed

    in a squadron as perfect formed as the ones I have seen in Italy. The may have been

    approximately 12.000 (Andagoya [1544] 1982: 150).

    In more modern times identity is still constructed by process of simulation in

    which the indigenous attempt to reproduce the ritual and political order of Hispanic

    institutions, and reluctantly accept the western hunger for accumulation. Thus, what we

    see in the story of the Puraceos is not only a very well organized myth of creation in

    which the world is organized in two mythical halves, hot and cold, or ice and fire, but an

    accommodation of an organized mythical world into the arrival of a modern colonizer.

    Surprisingly, in the story, neither the Indians, nor the non-Indian Mosquera loose their

    original identities. He brings the order, as the Indians wish, and the Indians cooperate to

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    9/16

    9

    let him satiate his hunger for accumulating wealth, a perfect match reaching back to the

    appearance of the Spanish cavalries in indigenous territories during colonial times.

    The cultural mixture of the two identities, western Creole and Indian, has created

    the mestizo, that identity that Paz has portrayed as trying to escape from itself by

    simulating, inventing, or counterfeiting others identities. In the mestizo, the original

    boundaries intersect and reject at the same time. Mythical order attempts accumulation,

    and rejects it at the same time because accumulating turns the individual into the greedy,

    evil Mosquera of the Puraceos story. As accumulation incorporates the love for order,

    the mestizo becomes suicidal because by accumulating, for example land or power, he

    has to incur in violence against his own people, thus destroying mythical order. Thus, in

    Latin American political systems the dominant mestizo classes dont accumulate to better

    the political reality, they do so to keep the political order, paradoxically, to keep the two

    diverse identities. The romantic idea held by Mosqueras daughter about the role of her

    father is also a romantic love for the sense of ritual order in which the Creole stays as an

    imperial figure ruling over the ignorant Indians.

    2. Building the State: Accumulation, Violence, and the Annihilation of the Indian.

    As we have shown above, the advantage held by early Spanish adventurers was due to

    their ability to travel in the continent spreading one well organized kingdom based on one

    language, one church (the community of god), and one government, that created in the

    indigenous populations a reliance on the sense of order that operated from northern

    California to Patagonia and from the Philippines to Cuba. Next, I explore how that sense

    of order was developed through a process of increasing violence, simulated from the

    European experience.

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    10/16

    10

    What shocked the Indians was not only the increased extension of their other time

    small geographic and cultural worlds but an organized sustained violent action in which

    they saw themselves converted into the servitude of the newcomers. The expeditions of

    Spaniards and creoles into undeveloped lands also carried Indians along routes never

    traveled before. Porters, guides, carpenters, masons, etc. were forced out from northern

    Chile and Peru into Colombia and Venezuela, young male and female Indians were stolen

    by Portuguese bandeirantes to be sold as slaves in the coast of Brazil. All of them were

    forced to move and to help in the building of new cities and towns. Despite the well -

    organized rituals of the Catholic Church, and its promise of a new land and paradise, the

    Indians saw their world turned upside down. They were forced to move in order to create

    new communities, new Indian towns, and countries. The composition of Indian towns

    became so varied that in a little capellania orencomienda of southern Colombia it was

    not hard to find men and women born under the seasonal weather of the southern cone.

    Families were formed at random, and blessed by the mandates and order of the ecclesial

    and civil authorities. For example, Santa Gertrudis writes, the day after they recovered

    from the flu, I called all of them. I made them form in lines divided between men and

    women. To the one who looked the most experienced man I gave a cane and made him

    into their chief. After that, I pulled out men and women from the lines and made them into

    families (Santa Gertrudis, (1775) 1970: Vol. I: 271). Thus, the formation of families and

    towns came to be for the Indigenous- organized and destroyed under the rule of only

    one order, that of the Spanish empire.

    Until the early 19th

    century, when the natives were already organized into small

    communities, the model seemed to work in some ways for both Indians and Spaniards.

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    11/16

    11

    Many Indians had developed prosperous towns under the eyes of the churchs misiones or

    the encomenderos, while the Spanish authorities kept enriching themselves by

    accumulating and trading the riches of the new world. Paraphrasing Hard and Negri, it

    was an Empire characterized fundamentally by the lack of boundaries, a rule without

    limits, and a regime that effectively encompassed the spatial totality. It was a regime built

    not only on conquest but rather on a new order that effectively suspended the Indians

    history. The Spanish empire really went to the depths of the social world by seeking to

    directly rule over human nature. Despite its bloodiness, it presented itself as dedicated to

    peace (Hard and Negri, 2000: xiv-xv).

    The empire, that seemed a perfect match of love for order and the Spanish desire

    to accumulate, collapsed because the Spanish side created its own boundaries after more

    than 300 years of ruling. The division on the Spanish-side between American-born

    criollos and the Iberian-bornpeninsulares halted the continuation of the empire because

    the former saw their geographic seclusion to a territory or province as a disadvantage.

    While the criollos, as Anderson explains, had only the option to succeed in power by

    appointment to positions within their own provinces, thepeninsulares could act as more

    powerful figures who could aspire to rule all over the empire including the kings cortes

    in Madrid (Anderson, 1983: 59). This created two types of individuals in the Spanish

    social structure and was the cause of the criollos to rebel and to break their link to the

    mother-land. It was the creoles who developed the independence movement when they

    saw no reason in sharing the product of their accumulation with the metropoli. Thus,

    boundaries, geographical and social, that had been present but not legitimized until the

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    12/16

    12

    explosion of the independentista movements of the early 1800s created 18 new republics

    in Spanish America after 1810.

    The breaking of the colonies-metropoli link was catastrophic for the Indians. They

    suffered from the expropriation of the lands the crown had assigned to them, and the lack

    of recognition of the Indigenous authorities, in the past protected by the figure of the

    king. Another consequence was the expropriation of the Churchs lands and the expulsion

    of the priests that not only affected the power of the Church but also the wellbeing of

    many Indians who had seen in the priests their protectors against the greediness of the

    landed criollos. Thus, after many Independencias, the Indians ended up secluded in

    rapidly shrinking resguardos whose autonomy and sovereignty was solely based in old

    titles granted by the long gone king (e.g. the Puraceos based their right over land in a

    title granted by the Spanish king in 1784). Their role, as the Puraceos story testifies, was

    not other than that of second class citizens of states that condemned them to live in

    seclusion until suddenly some sporadic discovery (such as sulfur) in the lands of their

    resguardos make them useful to the interests of the heirs of the criollos.

    The seclusion of the Indian in the resguardos not only marked a physical

    seclusion from the world of the criollos and the mestizos but segregation from all aspects

    of political life. As in Walzer, the Indian minority became marginal, vulnerable, poor,

    and stigmatized, in part at least, because of their commitment to a traditional culture and

    political life (Walzer, 2004: 45). This is evident in most of the 19th centurys Latin

    American constitutions that declared the native Indians as legal minors (e.g. Colombian

    Law No 89 of 1890). As a result, the newly formed states could freely decide on the most

    fundamental rights of indigenous such as the place of living, freedom of movement,

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    13/16

    13

    ability to contract, tax paying, the owning of property, etc. The conversion of indigenous

    population into minors had no other intention than the political annihilation of the

    indigenous. The seclusion of the Indigenous in this juridical limbo signifies that as in

    Wolin, Latin American countries have become a nationalistic force that pursuits a

    homogenous identity that is been quickened through purgatives such as ethnic cleansing

    or the imposition of a [legal] orthodoxy (Wolin, 1996:32). Example of these policies is

    Colombian Liberal Pedro Fermn de Vargas address to Congress in the 19th

    century:

    To expand our agriculture it would be necessary to Hispanicize our Indians.

    Their idleness, stupidity, and indifference toward normal human endeavors causes one to

    think that they come from a degenerate race which deteriorates in proportion to the

    distance from its origin it would be very desirable that the Indians be extinguished, by

    miscegenation with the whites, declaring them free of tribute and other charges, and

    giving them private property in land (Anderson, 1983: 21).

    The status of indigenous people as legal minors still affects their political

    participation in Latin America. Indigenous seclusion within legal and geographic

    boundaries created under colonial rule has not changed. Their right, for example to buy

    and sell lands, is still subject to their condition as legal minors, as expressed in

    Colombias supreme court sentence No C-139/96 (04-09-1996), that denies indigenous

    possibilities to contract. Evidence of this denial is also found for example in the claims

    made by the Mexican governor of the state of Oaxaca who accused the Mexican

    indigenous law as racist and discriminatory (La Jornada news-, 2001:01-05. page 2).

    The old distinction between Creole and Indian is still present within new features

    of domination. In Latin America the boundaries are set no longer between the criollos

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    14/16

    14

    and the peninsulares but inside the systems of their new democracies. In each country

    these boundaries are not geographic but borders between the poor and marginalized,

    mostly of Indian descent, and the well-to-do mostly criollos descendants. The Indian

    that leaves the resguardos becomes a poor urban dweller whose indianess dies as he

    approaches the city. The one who stays within the resguardos dies poor and marginalized

    in a territory delineated by a long gone king. In recent times those old boundaries,

    between the Indians and the criollos, are also translated into boundaries between the

    urban elites, most of them mestizos, and the rural and urban poor. The Indians, despite

    their actual presence in the isolated resguardos and in the museums and cultural

    institutions, seem to have disappeared, annihilated by years of policing and the majoritys

    belief that the Indian is part of past history and myth.

    Conclusion.

    I have argued here that in Latin America democratization has not been able to

    fully develop the political potentialities of ordinary citizens to become political beings.

    Political beingness has been constrained by a process of simulation in which native

    culture has been abused by powerful nationalistic forces that have taken advantage of the

    indigenous primitive sense of order, while forcing them to incorporate patterns of

    western hunger for accumulation.

    Second, identity has been formed in Latin America through a violent relationship

    between dominant and dominated identities inherited from Spanish imperial colonization.

    The breaking of the link between the colonies and the metropoli produced a process of

    constant violence in which the Indians have suffered expropriation of their lands, and the

    non-recognition of their local authorities. As a result, the Indians are still today secluded

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    15/16

    15

    in small resguardos and in a juridical limbo in which autonomy is paradoxically granted

    by national laws that seek the disappearance of indigenous culture.

    In both processes, the sense of belonging to an ethnic reality has been related to

    the individuals position in either the dominant or dominated ethnicity. Latin American

    politics has produced segregated political systems and failed democracies that while

    accentuating the existence of early social and cultural boundaries is still today attempting

    to escape from its indigenous roots by annihilating everything related to being Indian.

    References.

    - Andagoya, Pascual de. [1544] 1982.Relacin de los Sucesos de Pedrarias Dvilaen la Tierra Firme y de los Descubrimientos del Mar del Sur. In Antonio Cuervo

    (ed.) Coleccin de Documentos Inditos sobre la Geografa y la Historia de

    Colombia Vol. 1. Bogot: Imprenta Prez. 77-165

    - Anderson. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread ofNationalism. New York: Verso.

    - Colombias Supreme Court. Sentence No C-139/96, April 9th, 1996.- Hard, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University

    Press.

    - Hnaff, Marcel. 1998. Claude Lvi-Strauss and the Making of StructuralAnthropology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    - La Jornada. Mexico DF, January 5th, 2001. Page 2.- Lvi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago: The University of

    Chicago Press.

  • 8/6/2019 Boundaries, Identity, and the Indian."

    16/16

    16

    - Lvi-Strauss, Claude. 1976. Structural Anthropology. Vol. 2. New York: BasicBooks.

    - Paz, Octavio. 1985. The Labyrinth of Solitude and other Writings. New York:Grove Press.

    - Santa Gertrudis, Fray Juan de. (1775) 1970. Maravillas de la Naturaleza. Vol. 1.Bogot: Banco Popular

    - Walzer, Michael, 2004: Politics and Passion: Toward a more EgalitarianLiberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    -

    Wolin, Sheldon S. 1996.Fugitive Democracy. In Seyla Benhabib. Democracy and

    Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.