Boston vs. the bay
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
timothy-jones -
Category
Technology
-
view
1.103 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Boston vs. the bay
February 18, 2008
MIT/East Coast Overview
Timothy B. JonesSloan Fellow 2007
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Agenda
Boston vs. Silicon Valley comparisonsHybridization of Risk CapitalMIT Organizations and InstitutionsMIT Innovation Update and Regional Deal MetricsOpportunity areas
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Regional Advantage
As predicted by Dr. AnnaLee Saxenian, Rte.128/Boston lags Silicon Valley in
– Sustainable Innovation– Job/Company/Wealth Creation– Serial Entrepreneurship
The Regional differences in performanceare increasing not decreasing in the Post-Bubble Environment:
…But WHY?
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Boston vs. The BayRte. 128– Distance from innovation– Vertical Integration– Proprietary Development– Intolerance for failure– Case Study approach– Talent Flow: OUT– Result: Inertia
Silicon Valley– Geographic proximity to deals– Network-Centric– Open Innovation– Try, Try, Try again– Life is the classroom– Talent Flow: IN– Result: Acceleration
VS
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Observation #1:Different Post-Bubble ActivitiesIn SV: – Unsuccessful Entrepreneurs went to work for large companies, but
kept building business plans– Successful Entrepreneurs took vacation, retrenched, then went
back to the garageIn Boston: – Unsuccessful Entrepreneurs went into consulting, banking, or
consumer products– Successful Entrepreneurs took vacation…then went into real estate
Notable exceptions: – Jeremy Allaire, Brightcove
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Observation #2:Insufficient DiasporaIn SV, successful companies created a Diaspora, an emigration to new ventures while maintaining ties to previous companies as collaboration partnersIn Boston, successful companies created tighter vertical integration and control over complementary assets…but not new spin-off firmsWhere are the successful spinoffs of:– Akamai– NetGenesis– Sycamore Networks– EMC– ATG– ?
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Observation #3: Angel Ossification
Boston Angel community splitting into two distinct groups– Professional Angel Funds (Common Angels, North Shore Angels)
funding deals in $250k-$2M rangeCompanies only requiring up to $20M, so little life sciences orenergy investingMedical Equipment dominant sector followed by software1-2 investments/quarter; invest in 1 of every 100 deals
– HNW individuals trolling MIT Enterprise Forum doing deals in $25k-$100K range
Not enough deals being done with sufficient funding to create a vibrant early stage community
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Observation #4: Cultural Resistance in Venture CommunityThe last 4 years of internet-oriented investing focused on consumer-driven activity, enhanced collaboration, and social interactionThese are precisely the weaknesses of New England’s regional cultureAs a result, few new media, Web 2.0/consumer internet, Open Source, etc. deals. – missed the “boomlet” in returns post bubbleWaiting for next Telecom, Enterprise SW (via Appliances) capital spending cycle => dormant for last 6 years
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Result: A Growing Lead for SV
Silicon Valley has 3x the deal execution of New EnglandSilicon Valley still provides more funding than the next four table entries combined, by dollar volume as well as deals executed
Source: PWC Money Tree Q4 2006
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
New Risk Capital in later rounds
Private Equity and Hedge Funds– 9000 Hedge funds with over $1T in
capital– 15-25% Side Pocket funds – search for
Alpha– Decision cycle in days-<1Month– Convertible Debt, Convertible Preferred
vs. Participating Convertible Preferred– Particularly appealing to cash-dependent
biotech firms– Actively recruiting GP’s from east coast
firms to run venture portfolios– Key Players:
DE ShawTPGFortress Investment
– Key Deals:Microbia ($75M)Merrimack Pharma($65M)
London Stock Exchange - Alternative Investment Market (AIM)
– No minimum company size, capital raises comparable to B and C rounds ($10M +)
– $1M in compliance costs vs. $3M(SARBOX)
– Fidelity Investments (largest shareholders) driving Fidelity Ventures to pursue these exits
– Alternative to later stage venture capital for existing VC-backed firms
– Alternative to VC for closely held private firms
– Aggressive Nominated Advisors (NOMADS) cold-calling CEO’s of East Coast startups
“it takes just as long to fly to London as it does to SF”
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Changing MIT Institutions
Desphande Center– Up for funding review and renewal
Only one exit (Brontes, $95M on $8M Series A)Resistance to deep diligence
Technology Licensing Office– Low Profile
Life Science Labs stealing the limelight, talent and the funding– MIT changing requirements to include life science in core– Whitehead, Broad
Media Lab– Frank Moss replaces Nick Negroponte– Less focus on whimsy, more on corporate return– Increasing emphasis on mobility- (eLens project)
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
MIT Deals
Visit TBJ Investments Cambridge Techwatch: http://tbjinvestments.typepad.com/Notable– Timothy Swagert, Lemelson Prize Winner 2007
Explosive Detection Sensors using Optical Fluorescence– Erich Ippen – EECS
Polarization-resistant photonic circuitsDiligence being conducted by Ralf Faber (SF ’07, sold NetOpix to Corning for $2.1B)
– Tomaso PoggioVisual Recognition using neuron simulation
– Michael StonebrakerMorpheus Project: Data Transformation
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
New England Deal composition
2:1 Advantage of Biotech over Software in $’s, Software still leads in # dealsIndustrial/Energy overtook medical devices in last year to become 3rd place sectorDespite the fact that 70% of US economy is consumer driven, Consumer-oriented product/services are 3rd lowest category
Source: PWC Money Tree Q4 2006
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Interesting Areas
Enterprise 2.0– Google, Convera, Oracle, et al moving inside firewall with search– Replacing Enterprise software with Web 2.0 Generation Technologies– Google Apps taking on Microsoft on the desktop– Jeff Immelt, GE – Concern about how to manage blogs/internally
generated contentSemantic Web– Tim Berners-Lee and Decentralized Information Group (DIG)
Convergence of Digital and Physical– Center for Bits and Atoms (Neil Gershenfeld)
Life Science overlay on multiple disciplines– Computational Chem/Bio
© 2007 MIT Sloan School of Management
Thanks for your time!