Global Warming Hiatus Mátyás Csiky, Harold Eyster, & Sebastian Saldivar.
Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob
Transcript of Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob
![Page 1: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Impact of forests on climate change
Borbála Gálos1 – Csaba Mátyás1 – Daniela Jacob2
1University of West Hungary, Faculty of Forestry2Climate Service Center, Germany
International LCLUC Regional Science Meeting in Central Europe17th October 2014
![Page 2: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
(IPCC AR5, Jacob et al. 2013)
Projected climate change 2071-2100 vs. 1971-2000
yearly temperature meanyearly precipitation sum
1. Motivation and scientific questions
![Page 3: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Motivation and scientific questions
Can forest cover increase influence the projected climate change signal?
B) In which magnitude?
or
EC-FP7 project CC-TAME (Climate Change – Terrestrial Adaptation and Mitigation in Europe)
A) Enhance or mitigate?
or=+ =+
due to emission changedue to forest cover increase
Climate change
due to emission change forest cover increase
only biogeophysical aspects!
![Page 4: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2.1 Experiment set-up
1961-1990 2071-2100
Control simulationwithout
land cover change
Emission scenario simulations- greenhouse gas forcings A1B, A2 -
without land cover change
with potential afforestation
Climate change due to emission
Climate change due to forest cover increase
Regional climate model REMO
(Jacob et al. 2007)
Climate change due to emission and forest cover change
=+
Simulation domain
[m]
Horizontal resolution: 0.22°
Analyzed months: June-July-August
2 case studies: for Hungary and for Europe
![Page 5: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2.2 Changes of the land surface characteristicsdue to maximal afforestation for summer
%
Forest cover changeReference forest cover Maximal afforestation%
![Page 6: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Parameterisation of vegetation in the applied climate model
Fractions in a gridbox
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Sea iceWaterLand
AVHRR data(1 km)
Olson classification
Global distribution of
ecosystem types
Land surface parameters for each type
Aggregation to the model grid cell
Satellite data
![Page 7: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2.3 Changes of the land surface characteristicsdue to maximal afforestation for summer
%
Forest cover change
Roughness length: increase Leaf area index: increase Albedo: decrease
m
Reference forest cover Maximal afforestation%
![Page 8: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
+ =
%
Precipitation: increaseEvapotranspiration: increase
Surface temperature: decrease
°C
3.1 Climate changes due to maximal afforestation
Simulation results for 2071-2100
• with- vs. without forest cover change
• summer
(Gálos et al. 2012)
![Page 9: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3.2 Changes of the summer precipitation + =
SWH SEH
NEH
-17
9
-18
-27-24
-8
-24-30 -31
6 73
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30dP [%]
SWH SEH NEHHungary
(Gálos et al. 2011)
![Page 10: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
4. Case study for Europe
Existing forest cover [%] Potential forest cover [%]
dForest cover [%]
Forest cover change [%]
The potential afforestation map is based on the • net primary production map
(derived from MODIS products),• precipitation and temperature
conditions (Wordclim database)• soil conditions (International
Institute for Applied SystemsAnalysis; Kindermann 2011)
![Page 11: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EffectofGHGconcentrationchange
2071‐2090vs.1971‐1990 warmer&dryerwarmer&moistercooler&dryercooler&moister
Effectofafforestation2071‐2090
4.1EffectofafforestationonthesummertemperatureandprecipitationconditionsinEurope +
(Gálosetal.2013)
![Page 12: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
(Gálosetal.2012)
4.2 Change of summertemperature mean
due to GHG concentration change
2071-2090 vs. 1971-1990
due topotential afforestation
2071-2090
due to GHG emission+
potential afforestation2071-2090 vs. 1971-1990
![Page 13: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
4.3 Change of summerprecipitation sum
due to GHG concentration change
2071-2090 vs. 1961-1990
due topotential afforestation
2071-2090
due to GHG emission+
potential afforestation2071-2090 vs. 1961-1990
(Gálos et al. 2012)
![Page 14: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
5. Conclusions, application of the results
Afforestation in small forest fragments: slight effects;
large continuous forest blocks: regional-scale effects
Possible climate change mitigating potential:
cooler and moister conditions in summer
reduce the projected tendency of drying, the drought frequency
Both biogeophysical + biogeochemical feedbacks have to be considered! & appropriate land surface description
Practical application Assessment of the climatic role of forests
Identification of areas, where forest cover increase is the most favourable (from climatic point of view)
With appropriate land use strategy the mitigation costs can be reduced
![Page 15: Borbála Gálos – Csaba Mátyás – Daniela Jacob](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012515/618f6265660b103f1b6017a4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Thank You for your attention!