Body Massage Robot Technology

download Body Massage Robot Technology

of 20

Transcript of Body Massage Robot Technology

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    1/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 1

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review

    Jignesh Nakrani

    2015H141040H

    ME G511 (Mechanism and Robotics)

    ME Design Engineering

    BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus

    Abstract

    The interest in a healthy and happy life for people has increased of late as the quality of life in

    old age has become a issue. Moreover, the interest in health has led industrial companies to

    concentrate on massage technology. Body massage robot technology is one of the biggest issuesin the robotics field, and many companies and institutes have sought to develop a massage robot

    technology. The massage robot must have certain abilities that would allow it to help a person

    mentally and physically. There is no common interface module, however, for body massage

    robot platforms, and few robots that have healthcare abilities exist. Therefore, developing a

    common interface technology and applying the technology to robot platforms can pave the way

    for the development of a technology that could improve the physical and mental health of

    humans. This paper introduces the authors‟ research on  a massage for different parts of body and

    massage service robot platform. First, different body parts including head, feet, back etc. and oral

    rehabilitation massage robot area. In conclusion, the intellectual body massage robot is expected

    to promote a new field and to pave the way for a new product.

    1.  Introduction

    Robots are needed for tasks and

    operations that must be performed with high

    speed and accuracy in various industrial

    fields. In recent years, however, special

    attention has been paid to the need for robots

    that can assist human beings with their

    health and welfare needs. Robots which can perform these specialized tasks require

    complex mechanisms, and the ability to

    realize complex motions like those

     performed by human beings. [3]

    Therapeutic massage is considered

    an effective physiological treatment for

    human body. Many health benefits can be

    achieved through therapeutic massages, such

    as improved blood circulation, lowered

     blood pressure, reduced heart rate, relief

    from fatigue, relaxed muscle tone, etc. In

    medical applications, such as clinical patient

    care, therapeutic massages are usually

    applied for the reduction of pain, stress,

    tension and anxiety of patients [2].

    Previously, welfare robots such as a

    walk support robot, a food tray carrier, and a

    meal assistance robot have been developed.

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    2/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 2

    In addition, there have been a number of

    studies on multi-fingered hand robots. A

    multi-fingered hand can perform grasping

    and manipulating motions to handle objects,

    and can imitate the movements of a human

    hand. [3]

    The development of robot hands is

    toward an anthropomorphic design with

    multi-finger shape and the utilization of

    force/torque sensors and tactile sensor array

    to mimic the perception of human hands.

    Currently, most multi-finger robot hands are

    mainly developed for dexterous

    manipulation tasks and as prostheses. In

    addition to these applications, the use of

    multi-finger robot hand as a massage means

    is a feasible application for human health

    and welfare. Some research efforts on the

    massage issue were presented in literature.

    With adequate designs, the multi-finger

    robot hand can perform kinds of massage

    motions like a massage specialist does, such

    as kneading, rubbing, tapping and

    acupressure. [2]

    Recently, the research in the field of

    humanoid robots attracts a lot of attentions

    from many researchers in which most of the

    studies are focused on the multi-fingered

    robot hand. A gripper method and an

    impedance control are the outstanding

    representative methods among the

    researches of humanoid robots. In addition,

    in the field of rehabilitation robot, welfareand human supporting robot have also been

    reported. Most of the researches are focused

    on theoretical problem, but there is only a

    few researchers studied about the

    application of humanoid robot such as multi-

    fingered robot hand. [4]

    Examples include such robots

    include Toyohashi University of Technology

    (TUT), reported feed forward-type and

     Neural Networks massage motion control by

    off-line learning in the TUT Hand robot.

    This research described how a two fingered

    hand was applied, but that both the force and

     position control were insufficient, because a

    feedback controller was not included due to

    the lack of a force sensor. Therefore, the

    massage motion of this hand was too

    limited. Because of this, researchers decided

    to design a multi-fingered hand such as a

    four-fingered hand. However, it took a great

    deal of time to solve the inverse problem presented by Neural Networks. [3]

    2.  Types of Massage Robots

    2.1 ChairBot

    The robotic massage chair that uses the

     bio information of its human user for health

    monitoring is called ChairBot. It estimates

    the user‟s body states and analyzes the

    massage regions of the body using an

    intelligent decision-making system.

    ChairBot significantly helps a user

    overcome fatigue by providing him or her

    with massage services. 

    Figure (1) The description of ChairBot

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    3/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 3

    ChairBot utilizes a variety of

    technologies: the intellectual massage force

    feedback mechanism; the massage control

    technique, which applies the robot

    mechanism and senses pulses for diagnosis;

    an active seat for the user‟s convenience;

    and a sensor and interface technology for

    healthcare robots (Figure 1). [1]

    2.1.1 The Intellectual Massage Force

     Feedback Mechanism

    A block diagram shown in Figure 2

    explains the massage force feedback system.

    According to the user‟s health state and

     basic information, ChairBot performs itsfunction with the proper user position and

    massage strength. It looks for the proper Nth 

    actuator and an axis controller and could

    work efficiently based on the results of the

    health management program (HMP). [1]

    Figure (2) Block diagram of the intellectual massage

    force feedback mechanism 

    2.1.2 Massage Control Technique

    The results obtained from the

    intellectual controller present the user‟s

    massage pattern or taste. Lower-level

    modules are made up of the local controller,

    the position/velocity/pressure sensor, and

    the biofeedback sensor. The feedback loop

    remains firmly in place when the lower-level

    modules firmly connect to the sequent work.

    Figure (3) Block diagram of the massage control

    technique

    2.1.3.  Act ive Seat Technology for User’sconvenience

    The aim of active seat technology is

    to give its user an efficient massage. A

    sensor was utilized to recognize the

    somatotype shown in Figure 4. The sensor is

    made up of a probe tip with an accelerationsensor and a load cell. The important

    massage points for ChairBot are the neck,

    shoulder, and lumbar region. The hands are

    massaged repetitively from up downwards

    and from left to right, as real hands would.

    First, ChairBot scans the whole body

    of the user. Second, the seat automatically

    adjusts to the proper size of the user‟s 

    somatotype and then fastens in place. Lastly,

    the stiffness of the back area of the bodycould be graphically shown by analyzing the

    digitized data regarding the spot on the body

    that is suitable for acupuncture. [1]

    Figure (4) The block diagram of the active seat

    technology 

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    4/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 4

    2.2 Pushing and rubbing massage Multi-

    fingered Robot Hand

    In recent years, a lot of research on

    multi-fingered robot hand has been studied.

    A multi-fingered robot hand can perform the

    grasping and the manipulating motion to

    handle objects, and can imitate the

    movement of a human hand. However, these

    researches on multi-fingered robot hand

    have not given the concrete applications.

    Then, the authors have reported the research

    on human support and healthcare application

    of robotics and also multi-fingered robot

    hand. [2]In author‟s group, massage motion

    control for human shoulder by teaching-

     playback control was developed. Feedback

    controllers were corporate with feed forward

    linearization compensation of robot‟s

     position and force. Based on this concept,

    authors reported that position control was

    used to control the robot fingertip position,

    until it touches shoulder. After touching,

    control system was switched from position

    control to force one. However, the lateral

     position is gradually shifted while doing

    force control for the vertical direction of

    human skin. Furthermore, in massage

    control, exact control for both of position

    and force is not necessary for the

    disturbance such as finger touches the

    human bone, for example. Then, robot

    finger is hoped to have compliance like ahuman finger. [4]

    Therefore, in this paper, hybrid

    impedance control comprised of position-

     based and force-based impedance control is

     proposed to establish the suitable massage

    control system. By using impedance control

    technique to control the massage motion, the

    lateral position of the robot fingertip is

    controlled by position-based impedance

    control, while the fingertip force for the

    vertical direction of human skin is controlled

     by force-based impedance control. Hence,

    the massage point in the lateral can be fixed

     by position-based impedance control, while

    achieving force control of vertical direction

     by force based impedance controller. [2]

    In this paper, two kinds of massage

    motion control are studied, where one is the

     pushing massage and another is the rubbingmassage as shown in Figure 5. In the

    author‟s previous research, the pushing

    massage motion control has only been done.

    The rubbing massage motion control is the

    first study all over the world in massage

    field using maltifingered robot hand. [3]

    (a) Pushing (b) Rubbing

    Figure (5) Patterns of massage motion

    The schematic diagram of massage

    system based on the multi-fingered

    humanoid type robot hand is shown inFigure 6. The robot hand has 4 fingers with

    13 joints. The 1st finger has 4 joints and the

    2nd

      to 4th

      fingers have 3 joints and they are

    arranged like the human hands. [3]

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    5/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 5

    Figure (6) Robot structure and massage system

    construction

    The actuator for the robot hand is a

    small AC servomotor. The servomotor has

    an integrated harmonic gear (1/80) and

    encoder, and directly drives each joint. In

    this paper, the robot hand is controlled using

    the velocity mode of the servo driver.

    Therefore, the input torque τ of the robot

    hand is changed to the voltage by v  = Kτ.

    Here, v[V] is the voltage supplied to the

    motor of robot hand. The constant K is the

    coefficient which changes the torque to the

    voltage, and was obtained by system

    identification. The calculation method of

     joint drive torque τ is explained later. [8]

    The fingertip force of robot can be

    measured by fingertip type of 6-axis force

    sensors. For the measurement of a massage

    therapist‟s fingertip force, at first, the sheet

    type distribution pressure sensor, as shown

    in the lower left corner of Figure 5, is put on

    the hand of the massage therapist. Then, the

    massage therapist‟s fingertip force is

    measured when the massage therapistactually massages a human‟s body.

    However, this distributed pressure sensor

    can measure only the pressure force but can

    not measure the direction of pressure force.

    So, only one direction of force is considered

    in this research. [8]

    Figure (7) Robot structure and massage system

    construction

    2.2.1 Impedance control system

    Consider a finger movements

     performed by an expert massage therapist

    almost consisted of pushing. Pushingmassage is done strongly by fingers and the

    fingers are placed on the position of

    massage. In actual massage by therapists,

    the position of the fingertips does scarcely

    change very much, while the force of the

    fingertip is depended on the condition of

    massage position. But in fact, the massage

    object is a human body, so the massage

     position moves gradually during the

    massage  by robot‟s force control. By this

    reason, it is difficult to massage by a

    fingertip force control with keeping at the

    same position by robot. [8]

    To solve this problem for both of

    force and position control simultaneously, a

    hybrid impedance and force control is

     proposed for the massage control system by

    multi-fingered robot hand. By using this

    control, the impedance control is used to fixthe position on the human skin against the

    disturbance while executing the force

    control on the human skin. Therefore, this

    impedance control is suitable to control the

    movement of massage. A diagram of

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    6/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 6

    impedance control of robot hand is shown in

    Figure 8. [8]

    Figure (8) Conceptual diagram of impedance control

    The massage object is a human body,

    so the massage position is often shifted

    gradually during the massage by robot‟s

    force control. Thus, it is difficult to carry out

    the force control with keeping at the same

     position by finger-tip force control. [3]

    To solve this problem for both of

    force and position control simultaneously,

    the hybrid impedance control is proposed for

    the massage control system by multi-

    fingered robot hand. In this control method,

    the position and force control are realized by

    the hybrid position and force impedance

    control. Furthermore, when the finger-tip

    touches the obstacle like a bone, the

    fingertip slip softly against the bone in ordernot to give the damage to the bone like a soft

    spring-damper. A conceptual diagram of

    impedance control of robot hand is shown in

    figure 9. [3]

    Figure (9) Conceptual diagram of impedance control

    2.2.1.1 Position-based Impedance Control

    How to make the fingertip position

    of a robot hand follow a target positionusing impedance control is described. The

    mathematical formula of the desired

    impedance of massage control system with

    robot hand is shown in the below: [3]

    Where  x,  ẋ  and  ẍ  are respectively the

    fingertip position, velocity and acceleration.And, xd  , ẋd  and ẍd  are the reference position,velocity trajectory and acceleration until

    robot finger touches the object. Then , M d  ,

     Dd  , K d  and f  are the desired mass coefficient,

    damper coefficient, spring coefficient and

    the action contact force on the fingertip from

    the environment, respectively.

    A general dynamic equation of robot

    manipulator is shown in the below: [3]

    Where θ is the joint angle vector, M (θ ) is aninertia matrix, ȟ   (θ, θ ̇) is the Corriolis andcentrifugal term, τ is the joint drive torque, Jis a Jacobian matrix.

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    7/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 7

    Thus, a position-based impedance

    control input from Eq.(2) becomes

    2.2.1.2 Force-based Impedance Control

    It is possible to also make the finger-

    tip force follow the target force, realizing the

    desired impedance characteristics for the

    machine.

    The desired impedance of massage

    force control system is given not by Eq. (1),

     but by Eq.(4), and in stationary state, thefinger-tip force applied to objects agrees

    with target force. [3]

    Thus, a force-based impedance control input

     becomes

    2.2.1.3 Hybrid Impedance Control

    Hybrid control comprised of

     position-based impedance and force-based

    impedance is described. Position-based

    impedance control is used for the horizontal

    direction (y, z axis) of human skin muscle,

    and force-based impedance control is usedfor the vertical direction (x-axis) of human

    skin.

    By performing the position-based

    impedance control horizontally, a massage

     point does not shift during a massage.

    Furthermore, by giving a force reference to

    the vertical direction (x-axis) and giving a

     position reference to the horizontal direction

    (y, z-axis), the rubbing massage motion,

    one-type pattern of massage, can be also

    realized.

    The block diagram of impedance

    control of the massage system used in this

     paper is shown in Fig.4. Here,  f  x(θ)  is thenotations to transform the variables of θ  andθ˙ into the position  x and also transform thevelocity  ẋ  via a Jacobian matrix of robotkinematics.

    Reference position, reference force,

    desired mass matrix coefficient, damper

    coefficient and spring coefficient is given asfollows. [3]

    Figure (10) Hybrid impedance control of massage

    system

    2.2.2 Experimental procedure

    For estimating the stiffness of human

    skin muscle, at first, fingertip massage force

    of the therapist in one direction are read by

    the sheet type sensor at the real time and it is

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    8/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 8

    the input to a robot in order to estimate the

     parameter of the various stiffness (softness

    and hardness) of the object as shown in

    Figure 11. The left hand side in Figure 11 is

    the measurement point of soft one. On the

    other hand, the measurement point of hard

    one is shown in the right side of Figure 11.

    (a) Soft Point (b) Hard Point

    Figure (11) Measurement point of human body

    Reference input force was given

    from the data of the expert fingertip force

    executed by the therapist using the sheet

    sensor with real time measurement and it is

    shown in Figure 12 in the case of Figure

    11(a). The amplitude of the given input

    force was about 10 [N]. The estimation time

    was carried out after 1 [s] from the start of

    massage. The estimation parameters ofhuman skin muscle in case of the soft point

    and the hard point are shown in Table 1. [4]

    Table (1) Estimated parameter of human skin muscle

    Figure 12 shows the comparison of

    the position output response between the

    estimated values calculated from the model

    of Eq. (11) and the measured position of

    robot fingertip in real experiments with the

    same input force. Simulation results almost

    agree with experimental results, and model

    validity was demonstrated. [4]

    Figure (12) Estimation and experimental results of

    skin model

    2.3 Feet Massage

    Reflexology is a kind of assisting

     physical care through massaging or applying

     pressure to parts of the feet where will

    reflect an image of the human body in order

    to improve general health of the human.

    Based on this principle, we propose a new

    application of 7-DOF (degree of freedom)

    redundant manipulator to do the massaging

    work for human feet with the tactile sensor

    equipped to the end-effector. To facilitate

    the flexible and dexterous manipulation of

    redundant manipulator, the hybrid

    impedance control is adopted and extended

    to include the null space motion, not only to

    generate a desired motion of the end-

    effector, but also manage the contact force between the end-effector and the human

    feet. In order to improve the safety and

    comfortability, the reactive forces of the

    tactile sensor cells are monitored and

    recorded. [14]

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    9/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 9

    Reflexology, having a very long

    history in China, is pressure massage to the

    feet or hands in order to stimulate the reflex

     points and bring about a balance of the eight

     bodily systems in order for the body to work

    together in harmony and unison and thus

    creating a feeling of well-being and

    optimum health. The human body is

    completely reflected in the feet in a three-

    dimensional form, and a point on the foot

    which maps to an area on the body is called

    a reflex as shown in Figure 13. The benefits

    of reflexology will be the reduction of stress,

    relaxation, pain reduction, amelioration of

    symptoms for health concerns, rejuvenationof tired feet, improvement in blood flow,

    etc.

    Figure (13) The system setup of massaging based on

    reflexology

    In this topic, a redundant

    manipulator with tactile sensor equipped

    end-effector is applied to massage the

    human feet as shown in Figure 13. Then the

    reflex properties are analyzed. After that thesystem modeling is discussed with the

    introduction of tactile sensor and modeling

    of human skin. After that the impedance

    control is extended to control both the main

    task and null space motion. Simulations and

    experiments are made and several subjects

    are discussed later. [14]

    2.3.1 The analysis of reflex properties

    As the reflexology theory indicates,

     practitioners believe that the foot is divided

    into a number of reflex zones corresponding

    to many parts of the body, and the practice

    of massaging or applying pressure to parts

    of the feet will produce a beneficial effect on

    corresponding parts of the body, such as

    lung, shoulder, pancreas, kidneys and so on.

    Pressure applied to the feet generates a

    signal through the peripheral nervoussystem. From there it enters the central

    nervous system where it is processed in

    various parts of the brain. It is then relayed

    to the internal organs to allocate the

    necessary adjustments in fuel and oxygen.

    Finally a response is generated that is sent

    on to the motoric system. This message is

    fed forward to adjust the body‟s tone or

    overall tension level. [14]

    Figure (14) System modeling and human skin model

    The massaging gestures of

     practitioners always involve the pressing,

    kneading, rubbing or tapping. In this topic,

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    10/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 10

    the action of pressing will be performed by a

    robotic arm with a series of forces exerted.

    Massaging the feet reflexology by

    the robotic arm, will not only save the labor

    to do repeated work, but also guarantee the

    steady and standard practice, which will

    certainly be helpful to improve the quality of

    massaging work.

    2.3.2 Modeling of the system and skin

    It is very difficult to determine skin

     properties and to model its behavior, since

    human skin is a non-homogeneous,

    anisotropic, non-linear viscoelastic materialwhose properties also vary with age and

    individual, which is a very complex

     biological structure to study. Therefore in

    this paper, the variances of skin properties

    are not considered and we consider only

    different kinds of skin surfaces and different

    reflex points in the experiments. [14]

    2.3.2.1 System modeling

    The massaging action needs both the

     position control and the orientation control,

    therefore a lower-DOF manipulator is not

    sufficient. The 7-DOF redundant

    manipulator is applied to massage the

    human feet as the setup of system shown in

    Figure 14. The tactile sensor is installed at

    the tip of the endeffector in order to get the

     pressure of contact points. The tactile sensor

    is chosen as the module type of DSA 9210

    with the shell-like shape, having a size of

    50mm×25mm, which provides a spatial

    resolution of 3.4mm with 70 sensor cells.

    The working principle of the tactile sensors

    depends on an interface effect between

    metal electrodes and a conductive polymer

    covering the sensing electrodes, and the

    resistance between a common electrode and

    a sensor cell electrode is a function of the

    applied load changing with time. The output

    voltage of a resistive sensor cell in the

    electrical circuit can be detected on real-

    time, and the pressure on it will be obtained

    from the transducer characteristics. Then the

    forces exerted on the sensor cell can be

    achieved easily by transforming the sensor

     pressure. [14]

    2.3.2.2 Three contact types

    In general, based on the shape of

    human feet, three types of contact can be

    divided considering different surfaces as

    convex, flat and concave surfaces as shown

    in Figure 15(a), Figure 15(c) and Figure

    15(e) respectively. The experiments are

    made on three different parts of feet to get

    the performances of tactile sensor. The

    corresponding pressures measured on the

    contacted tactile sensor cells are shown inFigure 15(b), Figure 15(d) and Figure 15(f)

    respectively. Comparing among the

    experiment results, it is easily found that the

    reactive forces of the sensor cells are

    different although the same force at the end

    of the end-effector is exerted. The biggest

    reactive pressures of the contacted sensor

    cells appear in the convex type as shown in

    Figure 15(b), but the concave type has

    relatively the smallest pressures of contacted

    sensor cells in three contact types as shown

    in Figure 15(f), since it has more contact

    areas than others. As expected, the flat type

    arrives at a compromise. [14]

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    11/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 11

    2.3.2.3 Derivation of human skin elasticity

    Skin can be divided into two separate

    layers, the epidermis and dermis, and the

    studies show that the dermis is primarily

    made of collagen, elastic and reticulin fibers,

    Figure (15) Three contact models of human skinsurface

    which all contribute to the mechanical

     behavior of skin, though the epidermis is

    stiffer than the dermis. In a soft

    environment, the human feet skin is

    modeled as the mass-spring-damper system

    in the control scheme and the contact model

     between the end-effector with the tactile

    sensor equipped and the human feet skin is built up as shown in Figure 14, where M m is

    the inertia of the end-effector including the

    tactile sensor,  K k   and  Dk   are skin elasticity

    and damping coefficients while  K m  and  Dm 

    are stiffness and dumping parameters of

    impedance control.

    In the simplified model, the reaction

    force Fe can be expressed as

    (11)

    Where Fe  is the external force in thedynamic model of the massage motion and it

    can be obtained easily from the impedance

    control discussed in the next section. X i is an

    initial position where Fe becomes zero.

    Based on reflexology, the feet

    massage topic represent a way of massaging

    human feet by a 7-DOF redundant

    manipulator with tactile sensor installed at

    the end-effector. Since the human skin is

    very complicated and difficult to determine

    its properties, it is simply modeled as the

    mass-spring-damper system. Impedance

    control is extended to manage both the task

    motion and the null space of the redundant

    manipulator. Several key subjects are

    discussed, such as the contact types, human

    skin elasticity and so on. Simulations and

    real experiments are made respectively totrack the desired massaging trajectory and

    the results are compared while several

    factors influencing the experimental

     performances are considered and analyzed

    carefully. [14]

    2.4 Oral Rehabilitation Robot

    The expected Japan's future elderly

    society will undoubtedly increase the needs

    of medical and dental treatment and

    rehabilitation. Due to the increase need of

    medical care for patients and elderly

     persons, more trained experts and financial

    resources are required for providing services

    effectively. This causes a big problem for

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    12/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 12

    the both government and hospitals.

    Therefore, it becomes necessary the

    introduction of advanced tools designed for

     providing treatment to patients and elderly

     persons. Such concept was based within the

    framework of cooperation between

    engineers and medical workers. This

    concept was based fundamentally in the

    following two points: [7]

    1.  In the physiotherapy, treatment

     procedures by means of robotic

    systems enable to evaluate the

    efficacy of the treatment objectively.

    In contrast, it is difficult forconventional manual treatments to

    compare between the subjective

    strength of stimulation and

    effectiveness. Because the

    conventional manual manipulation is

     based on the experience and intuition

    of experts.

    2.  Develop a new physiatrist

    manipulation technique that is taking

    advantages of robot system. Robotic physiatric manipulations bring

    solution to cope with the increased

    demands of therapy by expert

     physiatrician.

    Based upon their experience on

    developing dental robotics, they proposed

    the development of a new rehabilitation

    robot designed to provide massage of the

    maxillofacial region. The estimated

     prevalence of oral health problems such as

    dry-mouth, temporomandibular joint (TMJ)

    disorders and swallowing disorders in Japan

    is over ten million persons in all. Massage

    therapy to specifically target organ, such as

    masticatory muscles and salivary glands, is

    effective to reduce the symptoms from these

    conditions. Therefore, they set the purpose

    of present study to develop a robot system

    that provides massage therapy to

    maxillofacial region. In this topic, the design

    concept of the Waseda-Asahi Oral-

    Rehabilitation Robot No. 1 (WAO-1), which

    is composed by two 6-degree of freedom

    (DOF) arms and plungers attached to the

    end-effectors in order to provide effective

    massage to patients. Furthermore, the details

    of the control system and safety features of

    WAO-1 are introduced. [9]

    2.4.1  Maxillofacial massage therapy for dry

    mouth

    The disease of dry mouth, also

    known as Xerostomia, is characterized by an

    abnormal dryness of the mouth due to the

    reduced capability of the patient to produce

    saliva. Such condition can be provoked by

    several reasons, such as diabetes mellitus,

    kidney diseases, stress, drugs, etc. The main

    symptoms are dehydration, pain in the oralcavity, and the abnormalities on the

    sensation of tasting. In severe cases, patients

    complain about difficulties to swallow and

    even to speaking. Nowadays, the

     pharmacotherapy and physiotherapy are the

    main procedures of treatment to patients for

    stimulating the production of saliva. In

    addition, dental treatment and physiotherapy

    are also provided. [9]

    For better understanding of the

    maxillofacial massage, we mention about

    the human anatomy. The saliva is produced

    mainly from three sorts of glands:

    sublingual, submandibular and parotid. In

    general, the maxillofacial tissue massage is

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    13/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 13

     provided to the parotid gland due to its great

    contribution on the production of saliva

    (Figure 16). The therapy treatment consists

    of providing massage to the parotid gland

    and its excretory ducts in order to stimulate

    the salivary flow. The massage includes the

     both petrissage and effleurage manipulation

    techniques. The petrissage manipulation is

    useful to stimulate the specifically target

    organ directly. The effleurage manipulation

     provides indirect stimulation by rubbing the

    skin surface. [10]

    Figure (16) Maxillofacial tissue massage consists on

     providing stimuli around the parotid gland, musculus

    temporalis and masseter

    2.4.2 System description

    2.4.2.1 Design Concept

    In order to provide effective massage to

     patients, the development of WAO-1 is

     based on the following design

    specifications:

    1.  Working area:  As we described

     previously, the target organ of the

    massage therapy for dry mouth is

     parotid gland. Similarly, temporal

    and masseter muscle are deemed as

    the target of massage for TMJ

    disorders. Therefore, the working

    area of WAO-1 should be designed

    to include above anatomical

    structures, as shown in Figure 17.

    2.   Mechanism:  In order to perform

    massage on both Zone A and Zone

    B, the WAO-1 mechanism should

    consist of two-arm manipulators

    that are utilized to control the

     position/orientation of plunger

    devices (attached to the end-

    effector). Of course, it is desirable

    that the driving mechanism of the

    arms is located out from the

     patient's visual field.

    3.   Applied Force: Using a head model

    that we will describe later, we

    measured the dynamic force on

     patient's head during the massage ofmaxillofacial region by skilled

     physiatrician. Thus we defined a

    maximum force of 4 [kgfl to

    massage around patient face.

    Therefore, WAO-1 designed to

    apply the same force to

     physiatricians. [9]

    Figure(17). Musculus temporalis is defined as zone A

    and parotid gland and masseter are defined as zone B.

    2.4.2.2 System Description

    The mechanism of WAO-1 consists of

    two main parts: robot arms and the plunger

    device. Robot arms consist of two 6-DOF

    manipulators used to control the movement

    of the plunger device attached to the end-

    effector of each manipulator. The plunger

    device is the only part of the robot having

    direct contact with the patient face (Figure

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    14/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 14

    18a). In the following paragraphs, a more

    detail description of each of the parts of

    WAO- 1 will be provided:

    1.  Robot arms. Each of the arms of WAO-

    1 is composed by a 6-DOF manipulator(Figure 18b). Each arm consists of two

    translational DOF on the base and four

    rotational DOF at the each joint of the

    arm. Due to this DOF arrangement, the

    robot arms do not obstruct the patient's

    field of view while providing massage.

    Each translational DOF consists of a ball

    screws and a DC servo motors which

    assures high positioning accuracy. Each

    rotational DOF consists of a harmonic

    drive gears and a DC servo motors with

    no backlash.

    (a) 

    (b)

    Figure (18) System configuration of WAO-l: a) WAO-l is

    composed by two 6-DOF arms and plungers. The torque

    limiters were attached in the arm middle part as safety

    device; b) DOF configuration of one arm

    2.  Plunger. A plunger which applies

    force to the facial tissues is located at

    the end-effector of each arm. We

    have designed different kinds of

     plungers by changing their shape,

    material, and number of passive

    degrees of freedom. Such plungers

    are exchanged easily depending on

    the needs of the kind of massage

    (Figure 19).

    Figure (19) several types of plungers

    3.  Safety device. The WAO- 1 has been

    designed to applied force to facial

    tissues of patients. Therefore, we

    require considering safety features

    that are needed to avoid as much as possible any possible risk to the

     patient. For that purpose, we have

     proposed the safety system shown in

    Figure 20. As it can be observed; at

    first software limiters and watch dog

    timer are implemented into the

    control software of the robot. In

     particular, rotational speed and

    motion positioning are limited within

    safety range of operation. The

    second safety feature has been

    implemented by attaching limit

    sensors at each DOF as well as fuses

    to limit the current supplied to each

    motor. The third one is implemented

    through torque limiters. The torque

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    15/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 15

    limiter has been placed in the middle

     part of each arm. In the case that the

     plunger load Fpr exceeds the

    threshold Fth; even if the robot

    system presents an unexpected

    failure meanwhile applying force on

    the patient's face, the arm will bend

    and the load will be also released to

    avoid any injury to the patient

    (Figure 21). Finally, the fourth and

    fifth safety features enables to the

    doctor and the patient to stop the

    operation of the robot at any time in

    case of emergency. [7]

    Figure (20) Outline of safety system. WAO-1 is

    equipped with different kind of safety features.

    The safety devices are implemented by software,

    electrical and mechanical means.

    (a) (b)

    Figure (21) Torque Limiter principles: a) when Fpr<

    Fth is found, the applied force is transmitted rough

    the torque limiter, b) when Fpr> Fth is found, the

    applied force is disabled.

    2.5 Head Massage

    In this study they focus not on the

    development of control algorithms, but on

    how a massage given by simple robot is

     perceived. This is even more important since

    for certain types of massages that are being

     perceived as more pleasurable when

     performed by another actor. It is well

    documented, for example, that you cannot

    tickle yourself. Furukawa, Kajimoto and

    Tachi developed the Kusuguri system to

    overcome the problem of remote tickling byusing smart phones and vibrators. Their

    study provides a first clue on robotic tickling

    devices. [5]

    Figure (22) The Happy Head Trip massage device

    The massage device in this studyovercomes this practical problem. The

    movements of a simple robot are not

    necessarily well controlled and the head

    massage device functions as spring between

    the robot‟s hand and the scalp of the

     participants. Even if the movements of the

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    16/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 16

    robot might be slightly rough, it does not

    cause any discomfort for the users. A scalp

    massage using the head massage device is

    therefore a good starting point for testing the

    effects of a simple robot giving a

    massage.[6]

    Tactile interaction with a robot might

    also have an influence on the attitude users

    have towards robots. Negative attitudes

    toward robots can decrease perceptions of

    anthropomorphism and closeness of the

    relationship between the human and robot.

    We therefore investigated if receiving a

    massage from a robot might change the

    attitudes of users towards robots.[5]

    Based on the arguments above we

    define the main research questions of this

    study as: [13]

    1)  Do humans perceive a head massage

    received from a human masseur as

    more pleasurable than a head

    massage performed by themselves?

    2) 

    Do humans perceive a head massagereceived from a simple robot

    differently in terms of pleasure than

    a head massage done by themselves?

    3)  Do humans change their attitude

    towards robots after they had a

     physical experience with them?

    2.5.1 Method

    We performed a within subjects

    experiment in which the independent

    variable masseur was either the subject

    him/herself (self) or the experimenter

    (human) or the Nao robot (robot). A within

     participants structure of the experiment was

    the preferred choice to compensate for

    individual differences in the appreciation of

    head massages. Some participants might

    have a more sensitive scalp than others. The

    assignment of the participants to one of the

    six possible sequences of conditions (shr,

    srh, hsr, hrs, rsh, rhs) for self (s), human (h)

    and robot (r) was counterbalanced.

    2.5.1.1 Measurements

    To measure the pleasure of the

    massage experience they used the “Massage

    as Pleasant” subscale of the Attitudes 

    Toward Massage (ATOM) scale. We only

    had to change the tense of the questions,since the original ATOM scale asked about

    a general attitude, while we had to ask about

    a specific prior experience. This scale

    consisted of five questions on a five point

    likert type scales in which 1 denoted

    “strongly disagree” and 5 denoted “strongly

    agree”. [5]

    1)  I liked to be massaged

    2)  Receiving massage is relaxing

    3) 

    Receiving the massage improved mymood

    4)  Receiving the massage made me

    nervous (reversed item)

    5)  I liked to be touched by the masseur

    We took the average of the five items to

    calculate the dependent variable pleasure. A

    high value on the ATOM scale therefore

    indicates a high level of pleasure. In

    addition, we measured the participants‟ view

    on robots with the Negative Attitude

    Towards Robots Scale (NARS) [16]. The

     NARS scale consists of 14 items in three sub

    scales that each are being rated on a five

     point likert type scales in which 1 denoted

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    17/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 17

    “strongly disagree” and 5 denoted “strongly 

    agree”. A high value on any of the three

     NARS sub scales indicates a high negative

    attitude towards robots. We also asked the

     participants about their prior experience

    with robots. In addition we video recorded

    the participants to be able to analyze their

    facial expressions during the massages. The

    video camera was placed slightly aside in

    front of the participants so that it could

    record the facial expressions of the

     participants. All participants were fully

    aware of the presence of the video camera

    and its recording function. They were to

    specifically told that their facial expressionwould be analyzed, but rather that the

    overall session would be recorded.

    2.5.1.2 Participants

    They had 18 participants at the age

     between 18 and 49 (mean 25.6) of which 7

    were women and 11 were men. Most were

    associated to the University of Canterbury,

     New Zealand. Twelve participants neverinteracted with a robot before, five reported

    they had interacted 1-10 times, and one

    reported that he interacted more than 10

    times with a robot. The participants received

    cookies as a reward for their effort. [6]

    2.5.1.3 Setup

    The experiment took place in a 3x5

    meter room. The participants were seated on

    a chair. The robot was standing behind them

    on a box that was placed on a table (see

    figure 22(b)). This was the only position in

    which the robot was able to reach the scalp

    of the user. For security reasons we strapped

    the NAO robot to the box and the box to the

    table. The robot could therefore not lose

     balance and fall onto the participants.

    The robot held the massage device in

    its left hand. The experimenter was seated

     behind the participants to control the robot.

    This prevented that the participants might

    have been under the impression that the

    experimenter is controlling the robot. The

    experimenter, in fact, only started the robot

    action sequence and supervised the motion.

    The movements of the robot action sequence

    was designed using the Choreograph

    software prior to executing the experiment.

    The experimenter would have aborted anyaction that might have made the participants

    feel uncomfortable. Fortunately, this was

    never necessary. [6]

    For the human condition, the

    masseur stood behind the participants as

    shown in Figure 22(a). For the self

    condition, the participants were given the

    massage device. The massage devices were

    washed with soap and water after every

     participant.The questionnaires were

    administered using an iPad. We used the

    Qualtrics service to design, present and

    collect the questionnaires. The participant

    could remain in the chair throughout the

    whole experiment. [6]

    2.5.1.4 Process

    The experimenter welcomed the

     participants and asked them to sit on a chair.

    Once the participants were seated, the

    experimenter provided an iPad that

    contained the introduction and consent form.

    When the participants agreed to the consent

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    18/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 18

    form, the participants handed the iPad back

    to the experimenter. The experimenter then

    explained to the participant the order of the

    conditions they will experience, and that

    after each condition, they will be asked to

    fill out a short survey. Once this has been

    explained, the experimenter passed the iPad

     back to the participants, and asked them to

    fill out a demographic survey and the NARS

    survey. The NARS survey consists of three

    sub scales: Negative attitude toward

    situations of interaction with robots (e.g. I

    would feel nervous operating a robot in front

    of other people), Negative attitude toward

    social influence of robots (e.g. Something bad might happen if robots developed into

    living beings) and Negative attitude toward

    emotions in interaction with robots (e.g. I

    feel comforted being with robots that have

    emotions). After the participants finished

    filling out the two surveys, they handed the

    iPad back to the experimenter.

    The experimenter then provided to

    the participants the head massage device so

    that the participants may familiarizethemselves with the device. Once

    familiarized, the participants handed the

    head massager back to the experimenter.

    The experimenter then instructed the

     participants on which of the three conditions

    the participants would be exposed to first.

    For example, in the masseur, self,

    robot ordering, the experimenter instructed

    the participant that the masseur will give a

    head massage to the participants for around

    45 seconds. A stop watch was used to time

    (a) Human

    (b) Robot

    (c) Self

    Figure (22) The Masseurs Conditions

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    19/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 19

    the session. This duration was selected to

    avoid any strain on the arm. If the

     participants had to hold up the arm much

    longer, it might have caused some

    discomfort. The masseur asked if the

     participants are ready. If the participants

    respond in the affirmative, the masseur then

     began the massage. Once the massage was

    completed, the experimenter provided the

    iPad back to the participants and asked them

    to fill out the first pleasure questionnaire.

    After the question had been completed, the

    experimenter took the iPad away from the

     participants and instructed the participants

    that it is now time for the self massage. [6]

    2.5.2 Discussion of Head Massage

    It is not surprising that the robot was

    not able to give a head massage that was as

    good as the one received from a human

    masseur. The human‟s ability to sense and

    act is largely unmatched. The superiority of

    humans is not limited to this study. Would a

    human control condition be included in most

    HRI studies then we would most of the time

    have to admit that, despite all our efforts in

    developing robots, humans are still the

     better butlers, companions, and conversation

     partners. But we shall not despair over this

    obvious disadvantage. The robotic

    development is still at its beginning and we

    shall not dismiss technologies in their early

    stages. Even Apple‟s first iPad, the Apple Newton, was hardly usable and it failed in

    the market.

    The main reason for the robot‟s

    limited massage skills are its lack of a visual

    or tactile feedback loop. The robot was not

    able to adjust its massage to the

    characteristics of each participant. They

    were different in height, skull size, hair

    length, and hair strength. Moreover, some

     participants appeared to have a much more

    sensitive scalp than others. [6, 11]

    3.  Conclusion

    The development of the body

    massage robot has the advantage of opening

    up a new market through the development of

    the machinery and equipment related to

    health and advanced robotic technology.

    Products from various combined fields aremanufactured, such as health support

    services that provide entertainment, health

    devices, and sport raining systems. The body

    massage robot is an interdisciplinary area

    that includes biotechnology, nano-

    technology, information technology and

    robot technology. Besides, the intellectual

    massage robot is expected to promote a new

     business field.

  • 8/18/2019 Body Massage Robot Technology

    20/20

    Body Massage Robot Technology: A Review | Jignesh Nakrani (2015H141040H) 20

    References:

    1.  Sungil Yi, Dongju Moon, Yongju Yang, Kangeun Kim „Healthcare Robot Technology Development‟ The

    International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-11, 2008

    2.  Ren C. Luo and Chih C. Chang „Electromyographic Evaluation of Therapeutic Massage Effect Using

    Multi-finger Robot Hand‟  2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Shanghai

    International Conference Center May 9-13, 2011, Shanghai, China

    3. 

    Panya Minyong, Takanori Miyoshi and Kazuhiko Terashima „Expert Massage Motion Control by Multi-

    fingered Robot Hand‟  Pmeedings of the 2003  IEEE/RSI InU. Conference on Intelligent Robots and

    Systems Las Vegas. Nevada ' Oclaber 2003

    4. 

    Panya Minyong, Keisuke Mouri, Hideo Kitagawa, Takanori Miyoshi and Kazuhiko Terashima „Hybrid

    Impedance and Force Control for Massage System by Using Humanoid Multi-fingered Robot Hand‟ 

    5.  Ryan Walker and Christoph Bartneck „The Pleasure of Receiving A Head Massage From A Robot‟ The

    22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication Gyeongju, Korea,

    August 26-29, 2013

    6.  Keisuke Mouri, Kazuhiko Terashima, Panya Minyong, Hideo Kitagawa and Takanori Miyoshi

    Identification and Hybrid Impedance Control of Human Skin Muscle by Multi-fingered Robot Hand

    IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems San Diego, CA, USA, Oct 29 - Nov2, 2007

    7.  Jorge Solis, Yuichi Obokawa, Hiroyuki Ishii, Hiroki Koga, Atsuo Takanishi and Akitoshi Katsumata

    „Development of Oral Rehabilitation Robot WAO-1R Designed to Provide Various Massage Techniques‟ 

    2009 IEEE 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics Kyoto International Conference

    Center, Japan, June 23-26, 2009

    8.  Ren C. Luo, Chih C. Chang, Vi-Wen Pemg „Impedance Control on a Multi-fingered Robot Hand Based on

    Analyzed Electromyographic Information for Massage Applications‟  IEEE International Symposium on

    Industrial Electronics (ISlE 2009) Seoul Olympic Parktel, Seoul, Korea July 5-8, 2009

    9.  Hiroki Koga, Yuichi Usuda, Masao Matsuno , Yu Ogura, Hiroyuki Ishii, Jorge Solis, Atsuo Takanishi,

    Akitoshi Katsumata „Development of Oral Rehabilitation Robot for Massage Therapy‟ 6th International

    Special Topic Conference on ITAB, 2007, Tokyo

    10. 

    Yuichi Obokawa, Jorge Solis , Hiroyuki Ishii, Hiroki Koga, Atsuo Takanishi, and Akitoshi Katsumata

    „Clinical Massage Therapy with the Oral-Rehabilitation Robot in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint

    Disorders‟  9th International Conference on  Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine,

     ITAB 2009, Larnaca, Cyprus, 5-7 November 2009 

    11.  Masao Kume, Yoshitosi Morita, Yutaka Yamauchi, Hideaki Aoki, Makoto Yamada, Kazuyoshi Tsukamoto

    „Development of a Mechanotherapy Unit for Examining the Possibility of an Intelligent Massage Robot‟ 

    12.  Chul-goo Kang, Bong-ju Lee, Ik-xu Son, Ho-yeon Kim „Design of a Percussive Massage Robot Tapping

    Human Backs‟ 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication August

    26 - 29, 2007 / Jeju, Korea

    13.  Takeshi Ando, Maki Takeda, Tomomi Maruyama, Yuto Susuki, Toshinori Hirose, Soichiro Fujioka,

    Osamu Mizuno, Kenji Yamada, Yuko Ohno and Honda Yukio „Biosignal-based Relaxation Evaluation of

    Head-care Robot‟ 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Osaka, Japan, 3 - 7 July, 201314.  Jingguo Wang and Yangmin Li „Massaging Human Feet by a Redundant Manipulator equipped with a

    Tactile Sensor ‟  2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics

    Montréal, Canada, July 6-9, 2010