BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS...

22
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 The Future of V ub Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010

description

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 3 Measurement type - Inclusive MXMX hadrons Charged lepton neutrino q2q2 p lepton 1. Cuts to avoid B  X c l 2. Measure 3. Extract V ub Quark level B

Transcript of BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS...

Page 1: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1

The Future of Vub Antonio Limosani

JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN)

BMN 2006

2006

2010

Page 2: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 2

Motivation• Fundamental parameter in SM

• CKM mixing matrix element

• Unitarity Triangle Side-length

Vud Vus Vub

Vcd Vcs Vcb

Vtd Vts Vtb

L SM ... gWbL

VubuL ...

3() 1()

2 ( )

VcdVcb*

VtdVtb*

VudVub*

Directly test the mechanism for CP Violation in SM

Page 3: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 3

Measurement type - InclusiveMX

hadrons

Charged lepton

neutrino

q2

plepton

1. Cuts to avoid B Xc l

2. Measure

3. Extract Vub

pl (M B

2 M D2 )

2M B

2.3 GeV/c ( : 10% phase space)

q2 (M B M D )2 11 GeV2 /c2 ( : 30%)

M X M D 1.8 GeV/c2 ( : 80%)

B(B Xul) NSelected NBackground

Quark level

B

Page 4: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 4

HFAG Vub AverageSource Error

(%)Stat 2.2Exp 2.8Bkgd model 1.9Signal model 1.6HQE: mb 4.2SSF/matching 3.8WA 1.9Total 7.3

Page 5: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 5

Fully reconstructed B sample• Dedicated exclusive channels are searched

for in reconstruction– 180 decay chains – Clean environment but small sample – Reconstruction Efficiency ~ 0.3%

• Reconstructed modes

Page 6: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 6

Fully reconstructed B analysis• Fully reconstruct the event 4-momenta of both B’s are known

• Identify lepton from BXl on the signal side

• Use Particle ID to reconstruct the hadronic system and calculate

• Estimate the signal BXul

Page 7: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 7

Belle Mx Analysis @ 253/fb

B=(1.24±0.11(stat) ±0.09(sys) ± 0.08(b->u) ±0.03(b->c))x10-3

Vub=4.09 x10-3 (1 ±0.049 (stat) ±0.035 (sys) ±0.031 (b->u) ±0.011 (b->c) ±0.045 (SF) ±0.038 (theory))

Mx < 1.7 GeV/c2

Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 (hep-ex/0505088)

Page 8: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 8

Mx Analysis : StatisticalError projections

Luminosity(/ab) 0.25 1.0 5.0 50.0Signal to Noise 0.65 1.5 2.0 2.0B tag efficiency 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6|Vub| stat % 4.9 2.0 0.7 0.2

Page 9: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 9

Luminosity(/ab) 0.25 1.0 5.0 50.0

Detector simulation 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Background model (charm)

1.1 1.0 0.5 0.5

Signal model Depends of HQE parameters : b-quark mass, mb, dominates

Extrapolating to full branching fraction (SF)Theory |Vub| :Matching scales, SSFTheory/Exp |Vub| :Weak Annihilation |Vub| stat %

Mx Analysis : Systematic & TheoryError projections

Page 10: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 10

b-quark mass, mb

(4.60 +/- 0.04) GeV/c2

Luminosity(/ab) 0.25 1.0 5.0 50.0

Exp error:Moments data

0.025 0.02 0.01 0.01

Theory errorVary s, mb, mc

0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

Total error 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03

Mx Analysis : b-quark mass

Precision on mb hits theory floor!

Page 11: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 11

Mx Analysis : Systematic & TheoryError projections

Luminosity(/ab) 0.25 1.0 5.0 50.0

Detector simulation 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Background model (charm)

1.1 1.0 0.5 0.5

Signal model 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4

Extrapolating to full branching fraction (SF)

4.5 4.2 3.9 3.7

Theory |Vub| :Matching scales, SSF

3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6

Theory/Exp |Vub| :Weak Annihilation

3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

Page 12: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 12

Mx Analysis : TotalError projections

Luminosity(/ab) 0.25 1.0 5.0

|Vub| total % 9.4 7.7 7.0 6.8

|Vub| exp % 6.1 4.1 3.6 3.6

|Vub| theory % 7.2 6.5 6.0 5.8

Page 13: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 13

Mx Analysis : TotalError projections

Page 14: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 14

Vub with Reduced Model dependencePhys.Rev.Lett. 96 (2006) 221801 (hep-ex/0601046 ) (BABAR Collaboration)

Mx < 2.5 GeV/c2

Vub=3.84 x10-3 (1 ±0.182 (stat) ±0.036 (sys) ±0.056 (b->u) ±0.038 (b->c) ±0.000 (SF) ±0.026 (theory))

Page 15: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 15

Error projectionsLuminosity(/ab) 0.1 1.0 5.0 50.0

Statistics 18.2 5.7 2.6 0.8

Detector simulation 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6

Background model (charm)

3.8 3.5 2.0 2.0

Signal model 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5

Extrapolating to full branching fraction (SF)

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Theory |Vub| :Perturbative

3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6

Total 19.5 8.9 6.6 6.1

Page 16: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 16

Error projections

Page 17: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 17

Measurement types - Exclusive

dB(B0 l )dq2d(cosWl )

Vub

2

B0

GF2 k

3

32 3 sin2Wl f (q2 )2

Vub B(B ( / )l

thy B

,

thy Form factor normalisation

Theoretical description parameterised by a single form factor

pion

Charged lepton

neutrino

q2

plepton

B Experimentally less ambiguous than the inclusive decay

Determine using unquenched lattice QCD calculations.

• Model independent• Limited to q2>16 GeV2/c2

Page 18: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 18

Current status - Exclusive

Page 19: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 19

Vub from B(B->lv:q2>16) Three methods 1. Untagged: Systematic error 4% @ 0.2ab-1 (BABAR)

• Previous to this study consensus was one couldn’t get lower than 8%

2. Semileptonic tag : Systematic error 10% @ 0.25ab-1 (Belle)• Systematic dominated by statistics of control sample• Total error 2.9% @ 5ab-1 and 2.1% @ 50ab-1

3. Full B reconstruction tag : Systematic error 2.1% @0.5ab-1 (Belle)• Total error : 40% @0.5ab-1 (statistics dominated)• Total error : 27% @1.0ab-1 • Total error : 15% @5.0ab-1 (improvement in full recon efficiency)• Total error : 5% @50ab-1

Theoretical uncertainties (Lattice QCD) Phys. Rev. D73:074502 (2006)Currently error is at 12%, but it’s anticipated that it will reach 5%.

Page 20: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 20

Future of Exclusive Vub

Page 21: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 21

Future of Vub

•Tagged analyses are essential

•At logged luminosities of 5/ab and 50/ab precision is limited by systematic and theoretical uncertainties ~ 5%

•Co-ordinated experimental and theory studies are needed to reduce this error further

•b-quark mass

Page 22: BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN 2006 2006 2010.

BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 22

Backup Slides