BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

17
BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005

Transcript of BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Page 1: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5)

Fall, 2005

Page 2: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Tonight’s agenda

Structural Frame: Introduction Citibank & Dyno

Page 3: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

A Structural View Metaphor: complex

machine Leader: analyst,

architect Strategy: do your

homework, analyze, design new approach, implement

Focus: data, logic, structure, plans, policies,

Page 4: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

One side of structure: Letterman at GE

Page 5: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.
Page 6: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Another side of structure: Joe Clark in his first day in a new job

Page 7: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.
Page 8: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

A Structural View Metaphor: complex

machine Leader: analyst,

architect Strategy: do your

homework, analyze, design new approach, implement

Focus: data, logic, structure, plans, policies,

Page 9: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Alfred P. Sloan at General Motors Appointed CEO 1923 In first year, GM’s

share dropped from 20 to 17%; Ford’s increased to 55%

GM passed Ford 5 years later

Structure Sloan inherited: feudal baronies

One option: functional organization

Page 10: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

 

             

                              

        

                      

 

B.C. Ministry of Management Services

Page 11: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Alfred P. Sloan at General Motors Appointed CEO 1923 In first year, GM’s share

dropped from 20 to 17%; Ford’s increased to 55%

GM passed Ford 5 years later

Structure Sloan inherited: feudal barony

One option: functional organization

Structure he built: product divisions with strong central staff

Page 12: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Options for dividing the work:

Page 13: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Options for dividing the work:

Page 14: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Integration: pulling it together

Formal vs. informal Vertical

Authority Policies, procedures, rules Systems (accounting, I.T.,etc.) Incentives

Lateral Committees, teams, task forces Coordinating roles Networking

Page 15: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Why cases?

Virtual tour: learn from immersion in different issues and contexts

Application of theory to practice Diagnostic skills: increase ability to

size up situations and develop strategies

Test your ideas against others’ ideas

Page 16: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Citibank

Overall, what grade would you give Reed and White for their change effort at Citibank?

Why? What, if anything, should they

have done differently?

Page 17: BMA533: Structural Leadership (Class # 5) Fall, 2005.

Citibank and Dyno Software

Citibank and Dyno both emphasize structure and metrics. Are they getting similar results?

Why or why not?