Slide 1

Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003

Slide 2

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5

Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598 2.Foundation/Wall Rating4.187 3.Window/Door Rating4.038 4.Porch Rating3.862 5.Exterior Paint Rating3.719 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.881 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 3.8783.955 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 6

Slide 7

Blue Hills Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating3.6972.333 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.0894.296 3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.5684.704 4.Litter Rating4.7184.602 5.Open Storage Rating4.8114.796 6.Accessory Structure Rating3.6023.833 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.3224.576 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.3224.323 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 8

Slide 9

Blue Hills Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public Sidewalk Rating4.0123.345 2.Curb Rating4.6284.313 3.Street Light Rating4.9764.880 4.Catch Basin Rating4.3054.283 5.Street Rating4.5084.414 Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.4214.061 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.4374.037 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 10

Slide 11

BLUE HILLS AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied185461.9% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied107936.0% Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status622.1% Not Single Family Housing613 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 14

Slide 15

Vineyard NPI Area Report March, 2003

Slide 16

Slide 17

Slide 18

Slide 19

Vineyard Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating4.137 2.Foundation/Wall Rating4.429 3.Window/Door Rating4.411 4.Porch Rating4.425 5.Exterior Paint Rating4.250 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.330 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.3284.711 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 20

Slide 21

Vineyard Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating4.0103.400 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.5313.158 3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.8274.761 4.Litter Rating4.8624.278 5.Open Storage Rating4.9024.750 6.Accessory Structure Rating4.1473.444 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.5824.161 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.5824.62 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 22

Slide 23

Vineyard Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public Sidewalk Rating2.4452.162 2.Curb Rating4.1683.004 3.Street Light Rating4.9014.877 4.Catch Basin Rating4.2793.708 5.Street Rating4.6034.514 Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.7453.230 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 3.7424.323 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 24

Slide 25

VINEYARD AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied111366.4% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied53431.9% Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status281.7% Not Single Family Housing299 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

Slide 26

Slide 27

Slide 28

Slide 29

Blue Valley NPI Area Report March, 2003

Slide 30

Slide 31

Slide 32

Slide 33

Slide 34

Slide 35

Slide 36

Slide 37

Blue Valley Components of Change in Structure Ratings (2000 to 2002) Average RatingsParcels with Residential Structures 20002002Difference 1.Roof Rating3.5763.418-0.16 2.Foundation/Wall Rating4.2414.7680.53 3.Window/Door Rating4.0564.5780.52 4.Porch Rating3.7854.2080.42 5.Exterior Paint Rating3.734.3430.61 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.8834.2640.38 Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family 20002002Difference20002002Difference 3.8784.2640.394.1094.2790.17 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 38

Slide 39

Slide 40

Blue Valley Components of Change in Grounds Ratings (November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure 20002002Diff20002002Diff 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating3.6763.8880.212.8823.4000.52 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.2084.7420.534.0224.7490.73 3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.7094.7690.064.7854.8940.11 4.Litter Rating4.6884.676-0.014.5334.7530.22 5.Open Storage Rating4.7244.7660.044.7714.9820.21 6.Accessory Structure Rating3.5893.7150.133.5263.5710.05 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.3454.5240.184.4794.8240.35 Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family 20002002Difference20002002Difference 4.3414.5220.184.5624.6160.05 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 41

Slide 42

Slide 43

Blue Valley Components of Change in Infrastructure Ratings (November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure 20002002Diff20002002Diff 1.Public Sidewalk Rating3.5073.5420.032.3382.4890.15 2.Curb Rating3.7313.9190.192.7022.8810.18 3.Street Light Rating4.9924.986-0.014.5474.5600.01 4.Catch Basin Rating4.2114.3650.154.1004.3080.21 5.Street Rating4.6854.8850.204.2094.4650.26 6. Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.9834.1050.123.0903.2690.18 Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family 20002002Difference20002002Difference 3.9824.1020.124.0214.2730.25 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Slide 44

Slide 45

BLUE VALLEY AREA - Single Family Housing (November, 2002) Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied148455.7% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied112242.1% Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status592.2% Not Single Family Housing693 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

Slide 46

Slide 47