BLOOM’S
description
Transcript of BLOOM’S
![Page 1: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Assessment & Evaluation in Language Testing
NDARU ANUGERAH - 20107479056
Department of English EducationUNINDRA PGRI – 2012
![Page 2: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
*can you figure it out?
![Page 3: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
BACKGROUND
Benjamin Samuel Bloom was born on February 21, 1913 in Lansford - Pennsylvania.
He was an American educational psychologist who made contributions to the classification of educational objectives and to the theory of mastery learning.
From the Pennsylvania State University, he gained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in 1935. Later, in March 1942, he received his education Ph.D. from the University of Chicago.
Bloom died on September 13, 1999.
![Page 4: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CONTENT
Bloom’s taxonomy was proposed in 1956 by a committee of educators at Convention of the American Psychological Association chaired by Benjamin Bloom who also edited the first volume of the standard text, Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals.
The name of Taxonomy is derived from Greek, Taxis = arrangement; and Nomos = law.
Bloom’s Taxonomy refers to a classification of the different objectives that educators set for students (learning objectives). Its intent was to develop a method of classification for thinking behavior that was believed to be important in the processes of learning and the measurement for thinking.
![Page 5: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
COGNITIVE DOMAIN
The cognitive domain involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills. This includes the recall or recognition of specific facts, procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and skills.
KnowledgeComprehension
ApplicationAnalysis
SynthesisEvaluation
![Page 7: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
AFFECTIVE DOMAIN
It includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasm, motivations, and attitudes. The five major categories are listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex.
Receive phenomenaRespond to phenomena
ValueOrganize (conceptualize
values)Internalize (characterize
values)
![Page 8: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN
According to Simpson (1972), it includes physical movement, coordination, and use of the motor-skill areas. Development of these skills requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or techniques in execution. The seven major categories are listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex.
PerceptionSet
Guided-responseMechanism
Complex overt responseAdaptationOrigination
![Page 9: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY
Lorin Anderson, a former student of Bloom, led a new assembly and revisited the cognitive domain in the learning taxonomy in the mid-nineties and made some changes, hoping to add relevance for the 21st century students and teachers.
It took six years to finalize their work. A more concise summary appears here.
The changes occur in three broad categories: terminology, structure, and emphasis.
![Page 10: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Terminology Changes
Changes in terminology between the two versions are perhaps the most obvious differences and can also cause the most confusion. Basically, Bloom's six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms. Additionally, the lowest level of the original, knowledge was renamed and became remembering. Finally, comprehension and synthesis were re-titled to understanding and creating.
![Page 11: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
up
to t
he m
ost
com
ple
x
![Page 12: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Structural Changes
Bloom's original cognitive taxonomy was a one-dimensional form. With the addition of products, the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy takes the form of a two-dimensional table. One of the dimensions identifies The Knowledge Dimension (or the kind of knowledge to be learned) while the second identifies The Cognitive Process Dimension (or the process used to learn).
The intersection of the knowledge and cognitive process categories form twenty-four separate cells .
![Page 15: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cognitive Process Dimension
SIMPLE COMPLEX
THE KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION
THE COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION
Remember
Understand
Apply Analyze Evaluate Create
Factual
Conceptual
Procedural
Meta-Cognitive
![Page 16: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Knowledge Dimension• Factual
– Discrete bits of information
• Conceptual– More complex, organized knowledge– Classifications, categories, principles
• Procedural– Steps to take, how to do something– Determining when to do what
• Meta-Cognitive– Personalize understanding for the user– Strategic and contextual
CONCRETE
ABSTRACT
![Page 17: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Changes in Emphasis
Emphasis is the third and final category of changes.
The revised version of the taxonomy is intended for a much broader audience.
Emphasis is placed upon its use as a "more authentic tool for curriculum planning, instructional delivery and assessment".
![Page 19: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Today’s teachers must make tough decisions about how to spend their classroom time.
Clear alignment of educational objectives with local, state, and national standards is a necessity.
Briefly, the structure of the Revised Taxonomy provides an even more powerful tool to fit today’s teacher’s needs for the alignment between standards and educational goals, objectives, products, and activities (Krathwohl, 2002).
![Page 21: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ON PRACTICE
Practically, The Bloom’s Taxonomy may be applied on every aspect of learning.
For example, in order to use the Revised Taxonomy, a lesson objective based upon the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears is presented for each of the six levels of the Cognitive Process as shown on the Revised Taxonomy Table.
![Page 22: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Remember: Describe where Goldilocks lived.
Understand: Summarize what the Goldilocks story was about.
Apply: Construct a theory as to why Goldilocks went into the house.
Analyze: Differentiate between how Goldilocks reacted and how you would react in each story event.
Evaluate: Assess whether or not you think this really happened to Goldilocks.
Create: Compose a song, skit, poem, or rap to convey the Goldilocks story in a new form.
![Page 23: BLOOM’S](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052702/568146c2550346895db3fadb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
\presentation\