Blood Relations
-
Upload
xiaomi-xao -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Blood Relations
Blood Relations
Syllogisms
Logical Connectives
Seating Arrangement
Matching Puzzles
Venn Diagrams
Cubes
Clocks
Calendars
Number and Letter Series
Syllogism is a deductive argument having two premises and a conclusion. The question
contains two premises statements and answer is to find the correct conclusion.
Types of Syllogism
1. All (Universal Positive - UP)
2. No (Universal Negative - UN)
3. Some (Particular Positive - PP)
4. Some Not (Particular Negative - PN)
Premise TypeSubject (A)
Distributed
Predicate (B)
Distributed
All A is BUniversal Positive
(UP)Yes No
No A is BUniversal Negative
(UN)Yes Yes
Some A is BParticular Positive
(PP)No No
Some A is Not
B
Particular Negative
(PN)No Yes
Subject & Predicate
In all the statements, first term (which is A) is called subject and second term (which is
B) is called predicate. Collectively, both can be referred to as objects or terms.
Classification of Statement
Every statement can be classified as one of UP, UN, PP and PN.
Standard Structure
For a two-statement syllogism question, there can be only three objects (or terms). The
question contains two premises statement. Your job is to find conclusion statement.
Each premise statement and conclusion statement conains two objects. One object is
common (Middle Term) in both the premises. Conclusion contains two objects which are
not common.
Premises: A --> B; B --> C (B is the middle term)
Conclusion: A --> C
Rules for Syllogism
1. When both the premises are negative or when both the premises are particular,
no conclusion can be derived.
2. The middle term must not appear in the conclusion. The middle term must be
distributed atleast once.
3. Term which is not distributed in the premise must not be distributed in the
conclusion.
4. When both premises are positive, conclusion will be positive.
5. If one of premises is particular, then conclusion is particular.
6. If one of premises is negative, then conclusion is negative.
Lets see how to find conclusion with the help of eamples.
Examples #1
Premises
All animals are mortal.
All men are animals.
First step is to classify the premise statements. Here statements are UP & UP. Check
Rule 1 and Rule 2 to confirm whether conclusion can be derived or not. In this case,
middle term (animals) is distributed in first statement, so conclusion can be derived.
Using Rule 4,5 & 6, you can say that conclusion will be Universal Positive (UP).
Conclusion: All men are mortal.
Example #2 (CAT 1999)
Given question has five statements followed by options containing three statements put
together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, where
the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
Question statements
a. Apples are not sweet
b. Some apples are sweet
c. All sweets are tasty
d. Some apples are not tasty
e. No apple is tasty
Answer choices
1. cea
2. bdc
3. cbd
4. eac
You have to check answer choices one by one. Option 1 is correct.
A Logical Connective (also called a logical operator) is a symbol or a word which is
used to connect two or more sentences. Each logical connective can be expressed as a
truth function.
Logical connectives
1. NOT (Negation)
2. AND (Conjunction)
3. EITHER OR (Disjunction)
4. IF-THEN (Material Implication)
In logical reasoning, we deal with statements that are essentially sentences in English
language. However, factual correctness is not important. We are only interested in
logical truthfulness of the statements. We can represent simple statements using
symbols like p and q. When simple statements are combines using logical connectives,
compound statements are formed.
Negation - NOT
Negation is the opposite of a statement. For example,
Statement: It is raining.
Negation: It is NOT raining.
Disjunction - EITHER OR
When two statements are connected using OR, at least one of them is true. For
example,
Either p or q: p alone is true; q alone is true; both are true
In such situation, valid inference is If p did not happen, then q must happen. And If p did
not happen, then p must happen.
Conjunction - AND
When two statements are connected using AND, both statements have to be true for
compound statement to be true.
p and q: p should be true as well as q should be true
Material Implication - IF THEN
If p, then q (p --> q): It is read as p implies q. It means that if we know p has occured, we
can conclude that q has occured. In such situations, only valid inference is "If ~q, then
~p"; If q did not happen, then p did not happen.
Negation of Compound Statements
Negation (p OR q) is same as Negation p AND Negation q
Negation (p AND q) is same as Negation p OR Negation q
Negation (p --> q) is same as Negation p --> Negation q
Logical Connectives Summary Table
Given Similar as Valid Inference
If p, Then q If ~q, Then ~p
Only If p, Then q If q, Then p If ~p, Then ~q
Unless p, Then q If ~p, Then q If ~q, Then p
Either p or q If ~p, Then q
If ~q, Then p