Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

15
Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer Jonathan Klein-Evans Vice President, Intellectual Property MedImmune October 16, 2008

Transcript of Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

Page 1: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective onKnowledge Transfer

Jonathan Klein-Evans

Vice President, Intellectual Property

MedImmune

October 16, 2008

Page 2: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

2

Where complex knowledge lies

Sources of molecules (Libraries)

The molecules themselves

Methods of generating (synthetic, natural, both)

Methods of screening

Enhancements

Methods of predicting

The modifications themselves> Activity

> Formulation

Manufacturing

Scale up

Efficiency

Yield

Page 3: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

3

The knowledge gets out

Innovative drug development costs requires enormous up-front at-risk investment

Patents provide opportunity to gain a reasonable return on investment in innovation

To apply for a patent essentially means to publish

When patents are hard to enforce, trade secrets may be preferable

> Manufacturing processes

Challenge to maintain secrecy in today’s mobile economy and digital age

Technology is publicized

Through advantages of patenting

Through scientific literature to attract employees and collaborators

Page 4: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

4

The two-way flow of information

In-licensing/collaboration: Bringing in technology and partnering development

Business Development group crucial to R&D growth> Industry and scientific conferences, venture partnering, etc.

Cost/benefit sharing have become more flexible

All stages – from early research to late stage development

Out-licensing: The broader the technology’s application, the less incentive to lock it up

Only so many drugs can be supported through clinical trials by any one company

IP rights provide return without additional investment through out-licensing

Inhibition of flow of ideas to market is not access to technology but cost and risk in development

> Patents help mitigate this risk

Page 5: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

5

Example 1: Phage Display

Discovery of fully human antibodies

Page 6: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

6

43 „non-immunised‟

donors, 7-70 yrs

Isolated B cells

VH and VL genes

assembled as scFv

Construction of 1011 scFv library

PCR amplified

VH and VL genes

H

H

H L

L

L

L

HPCR

Phagemids displaying

scFv

Cloning

Transformed E. coli

Rescu

e

Page 7: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

7

Phage display overview

Page 8: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

8

Phage Display Patent Complex

MedImmune (CAT)

3 distinct patent estates – libraries, display, fully human Ab’s

Dyax

1 basic patent estate

Others with pieces of IP/technology

Others competitors commercializing discovery process

e.g, Morphosys

Cross licenses arranged

Result: dozens of licenses, technology widely disseminated

Basic research and to develop drugs like blockbuster Humira®

Page 9: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

9

Example 2: Reverse Genetics

Genetically engineered influenza

Page 10: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

10

Seasonal Flu Manufacturing Timeline

USPHS final

Selection of

3 WT strains

J F M A M J J A S O N D J

Create A and B

vaccine “seed” strains

Target vaccine

release

Blend/Fill

Bulk production – mass

produce in eggs

Page 11: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

11

Creating Seed Virusby Classical Reassortment

Circulating wild-type virus

Donor virus Cell

Co-infect

1 of 256 Reassortant Viruses is proper 6 + 2

Page 12: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

12

Creating the Seed Virus

by Reverse Genetics

Circulating strain

plasmids

Donor virus

plasmids

PB1

NPPA

PB2

M NS

HA

NA

+

Shorten seasonal timeline

Remove dangerous avian

components

Reassortant

seed virus

Removal of polybasic cleavage site and

amino acid substitution

Optional

alteration

Cell

Page 13: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

13

Consolidation of Reverse GeneticsPatent Portfolios by MedImmune

MedI Fundamental Reverse Genetics Portfolio

Developed by Palese et al. at Mt. Sinai in late ’80s to early ’90s

Wisconsin Plasmid Rescue Portfolio

Developed by Kawaoka et al. at U. Wisconsin in late ’90s

Mt. Sinai Plasmid Rescue Portfolio

Developed by Palese et al. at Mt. Sinai in late ’90s

St. Jude Dual Promoter Plasmid Rescue Portfolio

Developed by Hoffmann at St. Jude around 2000

Page 14: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

14

Technology/Knowledge Flow

Public Component:

WHO global influenza surveillance program

> Collaborating centers – CDC

> Provide strains

> Cooperate with influenza vaccine manufacturers in seed generation

Private Component:

Reverse genetics

> Several licenses have been granted, including to the three major influenza vaccine manufacturers

Page 15: Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on Knowledge Transfer

15

Conclusion

Drug development is an expensive and risky business

Patent rights help encourage development

Patent rights foster knowledge dissemination and risk spreading

Publication

Licensing

Collaboration is dynamic and growing more so

Market forces have driven resolution of even the most complex patent situations