Biometrical genetics Manuel Ferreira Shaun Purcell Pak Sham Boulder Introductory Course 2006.
Biometrical Genetics
description
Transcript of Biometrical Genetics
![Page 1: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Biometrical Genetics
Lindon Eaves,VIPBG Richmond
Boulder CO, 2012
![Page 2: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Biometrical Genetics
How do genes contribute to statistics (e.g. means, variances,skewness,
kurtosis)?
![Page 3: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Some Literature:
Jinks JL, Fulker DW (1970): Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Psychol Bull 73(5):311-349.
Kearsy MJ, Pooni HS (1996) The Genetic Analysis of Quantitative Traits. London UK: Chapman Hall.
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th Ed. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992). Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Ch 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. (See revised ed. Neale and Maes, pdf on VIPBG website)
![Page 4: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Ronald Fisher (1890-1962)
1918: The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance1921: Introduced concept of “likelihood”
1930: The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection1935: The Design of Experiments
![Page 5: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Fisher (1918): Basic Ideas
• Continuous variation caused by lots of genes (“polygenic inheritance”)
• Each gene followed Mendel’s laws• Environment smoothed out genetic differences• Genes may show different degrees of “dominance”• Genes may have many forms (“mutliple alleles”)• Mating may not be random (“assortative mating”)• Showed that correlations obtained by e.g. Pearson
and Lee were explained well by polygenic inheritance
![Page 6: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
0 1 2 3 4 5Y1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Distribution of scores produced by two genes(N=1000 subjects)
-2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5S1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
The "smoothing" effect of the environment(N=1000 subjects, 2 gene model)
75 79 83 87 91 95 99 103 107 111 115 119 123Y1
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
Continuous distribution of polygenic trait (100 genes with small cumulative effects)
b.
c.
a.
![Page 7: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
“Mendelian” Crosses with Quantitative Traits
![Page 8: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mendelian Basis of Continuous Variation? Experimental Breeding Experiments
![Page 9: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
“Biometrical Genetics”
• Parsimonious specification of genetic influences in terms of effects and frequencies of individual genes (“model-building”)
• Systematic approach to choosing between different interpretations of the same data (“model-fitting”)
![Page 11: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A “Good” Model
• Fits the data• Explains a lot of different data in terms of
relatively few theoretical constructs• Embraces new data without substantial
modification or post-hoc explanation (“fudging”)
See e.g. Lakatos (1972) “Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge”
![Page 12: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Theory Model Data
Model-building Study designData collection
Model-Fitting
Fits?Revise Publishestimates
YESNO
“The Logic of Scientific Discovery”
![Page 13: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Assumptions (Initially)• Autosomal inheritance• No epistasis• No sex-dependent gene expression• Random mating• Genes of relatives (e.g. mothers) do not affect phenotype
directly• No GxE (see Mather and Jinks for GxE)• No G-E correlation• Simple model for environment• Effects of selection/mutation too small to affect result.
![Page 15: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Basic Model for Effects of a Single Gene on a Quantitative Trait
Mid-homozygote
Homozygous effect
Dominance deviation
Increasing Decreasing
![Page 16: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Derivation of Genotype Frequencies“Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium”
![Page 17: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Genotype Frequencies in Randomly Mating Population
“Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium”frequencies
![Page 18: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
What is the mean expected to be?
Note: Effects measured from mid-homozygote (“m”)
![Page 19: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
With equal allele frequencies (easier!) put u=v= ½
And the mean is expected to be….
![Page 20: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
How does A/a affect the variance?
![Page 21: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Equal allele frequencies u=v= ½
Additive component
Dominance component
![Page 22: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Q: What happens with lots of genes?
A: The effects of the individual genes add up.
IF… the genes are independent (“linkage equilibrium”)
Requires random mating, complete admixture
![Page 23: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
So:
Additive Genetic Variance Dominance Genetic Variance
![Page 24: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Additive and Dominance Components:Unequal allele frequencies.
Can show (see e.g. Mather, 1949)
VA VD
Q: What happens when u=v?
![Page 25: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Bottom line:
With unequal allele frequencies can still separate VA and VD but their
definitions change
![Page 26: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
d<-1 # Homozygous effect ("additive")h<-1 # Heterozygous deviation ("dominance")u<-seq(0.01,0.99,by=.01) # Vector of frequencies of increasing allelev<-1-u # Frequencies of decreasing alleleVA<-2*u*v*(d+(v-u)*h)^2 # Additive genetic varianceVD<-4*u*u*v*v*h*h # Dominance genetic varianceVP<-VA+VD # Total (genetic) variance# Plot resultsplot(u,VP,type="l",main="VA (red) and VD (green) as function of increasing allele frequency",xlab="Frequency of increasing allele",ylab="Variance component")# Add line for VAlines(u,VA,col="red")# Add line for VDlines(u,VD,col="green")
Plotting Effect of Allele frequency on Genetic Variance Components (“R”)
![Page 27: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
VA+VD
VA
VD
![Page 28: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
What about the environment???
![Page 29: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Two main sources of environment
• Individual experiences – not shared with siblings:
VE
• “Family” environment – shared with siblings:
VC
![Page 30: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
So: the TOTAL variance (Genes + Environment) is:
VP = VA+VD+VE+VC
![Page 31: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
“Heritability”“Broad” heritability:
h2b=(VA+VD)/VP
Proportion of total variance explained by genes
“Narrow” heritability: h2
n=VA/VP
Proportion of total variance explained by additive (homozygous) genetic effects (predicts response to selection – Fisher, 1930)
![Page 32: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
So far: have looked at effects on total variance…
How do VA and VD affect the correlations between relatives?
![Page 33: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Contribution of genes to correlation between relatives (r):
r = C/VP
Where C=Covariance between relative pairs
“C” depends of kind of relationship (sibling, parent-offspring, MZ twin etc)
But can also be expressed in terms of VA and VD
![Page 34: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Approach1. For a given relationship, work out expected frequencies of each type of pair (AA, aa etc.)2. Write phenotypes of each type of relative3. Compute cross-products of phenotypes of members of type of pair4. Each cross-product by the corresponding frequency5. Add the result of “4” across all pair types
The answer is the covariance you want (if you have done the algebra right!)
![Page 35: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
For equal allele frequencies….
![Page 36: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Contribution of one gene to covariance:
![Page 38: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Notice that terms in d2 and h2 are separated – but their coefficients change as a function of relationship
![Page 39: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Can add over all genes to get total contribution to covariance
Cov(MZ) = VA + VD Cov(DZ) = ½VA + ¼VD
Cov(U)= 0
![Page 40: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Can use the same approach for other relationships
![Page 41: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Relationship Contribution to Covariance VA VD
Total variance 1 1Sibling (DZ twin) ½ ¼ MZ twin 1 1Half-sibling ¼ 0First cousin 1/8 0Parent-offspring ½ 0Avuncular ¼ 0Grand-parent 1/8 0Unrelated 0 0
Contributions of VA and VD to covariances between relatives (ignoring environment)
![Page 42: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Adding effects of EnvironmentVP = VA + VD + VE + VC Cov(MZ) = VA + VD + VC Cov(DZ) = ½VA + ¼VD + VC Cov(UT) = VC
Etc.
![Page 43: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
To get the expected correlations
Just divided expectations by expected total variance
Results are proportional contributions of VA, VD etc. to total variance
![Page 44: Biometrical Genetics](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081513/56816720550346895ddba1f5/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Practice (paper and pencil)
• Pick a “d” and “h” (e.g. d=1,h=1; d=1,h=0)• Pick a frequency for the increasing (A) allele
(e.g. u=0.2, u=0.7)• Work out VA and VD• Tabulate on board